Design Strategies To Energy Efficient Building in Kathmandu Valley - A Case Study of CES-Zero Energy Building at Institute of Engineering
Design Strategies To Energy Efficient Building in Kathmandu Valley - A Case Study of CES-Zero Energy Building at Institute of Engineering
Abstract
Demand for energy is skyrocketing around the globe, environmental challenges are becoming more severe than
ever before.Carbon dioxide, methane gas and other greenhouse gases are rapidly contributing to global warming
and ozone depletion phenomenon.Buildings are among major contributors of green house gases and consuming
more than 40% of total primary energy.It is responsibility of building design professionals to address the impacts
of their practice on the environment by reducing the energy consumption and carbon emission of their projects.For
the purpose to promote practical design strategies to help Architects and Engineers to design energy-neutral and
environment friendly buildings,The primary emphasis of study is to analyze and explore core principles of building
physics into the design process and programs of study project: Center for Energy Studies Zero Energy Building
(CES-ZEB) located at Institute of Engineering,Pulchowk Campus,Lalitpur.It focuses to implement the core energy
saving design strategies as energy efficient measures into design and evaluate its performance with a normative
simulation tool as per performance rating method established by standard to approve it for energy efficient building
in Kathmandu valley.
Keywords
Center for Energy Study, Zero Energy Building (CES-ZEB) – Simulation tool – Energy Efficient Building
in the wet season[4], Led to a tremendous anomaly in done through research reports, journals.After collecting
the captive electricity generation by imported petroleum the quantitative data from meteorological department
products. So, The energy efficiency is most in each and and energy plus weather file-2017,The climatic
every sector in our country.Developing the appropriate parameter for design strategy have been analyzed
design strategies for energy efficient building technology through climate consultant software version 6.0. See
i.e.Zero Energy Building in building sector can have a figure-1 for passive design strategy for the climatic
very significant impact on improving the environment context in study project site.The prototype energy
addressing key energy issues[5].For the purpose,The model of study project have been developed in sketch
collective efforts of individuals could lead to the most up and open studio for simulation with reference to
powerful initiation. prototype office building[6] and also considered
existing data to reflect existing building characteristics
1.2 Purpose and Objectives in the context.The overall modeling methods outlined as
per standard[7]provides the majority of baseline
The need of the whole building energy simulation modeling information and some assumptions used for
extends beyond to assist designers and engineers for simulation analysis originated from the advanced energy
testing and continuation of energy efficiency measures design guide for office buildings [6].Then the whole
and promote the evolution of building metrics.The building prototype energy model have been simulated to
whole building energy simulation is needed to generate, analyze and evaluate the implemented design strategies
simulate and analyze building models in climatic for its performance on annual building utility.
context.It offers speed, simplicity ,graphic user
interface, integration multiple simulation engines,
2.1 Building Operating Characteristics
command line interface functionality, rule based code
compliance checking data display,reporting and The majority of office floor space operated between 40
integrated graphical results with sensitive guidance in to 60 hours a week. Typical occupancy, HVAC, lighting
climatic context to analyze various stages of the design and miscellaneous equipment were considered as per
and operational process of building. For the standard[8].The building was assumed to follow typical
purpose,The objectives of this study were: office occupancy patterns with peak occupancy
occurring during normal working hours from 10 AM to
• To evaluate and explore design strategies of CES- 8 PM Sunday through Friday. See figure-2 for
Zero energy building as overall building system occupancy Summary. Limited occupancy was assumed
energy efficiency measures for energy efficient to begin at 10 am.After then working hours assumed
building solution in Kathmandu valley. through midnight for janitorial functions only. All
working day occupancy was assumed to be 50% of peak
• To develop whole building energy model occupancy while holiday and weekend occupancy were
reflecting study project for simulation to analyze assumed to be approximately 5% of peak occupancy.
annual operational performance of its
implemented design strategies on building utility
in climatic context.
520
Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference, 2017
521
Design Strategies to Energy Efficient Building in Kathmandu Valley -A Case Study of CES-Zero Energy
Building at Institute of Engineering.
522
Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference, 2017
Zone/Standard Space Type Area People Definition Electrical Plug Lights Intensity
and process load Intensity
(m2 ) (People/m2 ) (W/m2 ) (W/m2 )
Conference/Class Room/Multipurpose Hall 273.04 0.5 4.5 7.8
Corridor/Waiting/Lobby 228.9 0.009 1.35 2.7
Elec./Mechanical 167.78 - 2.7 5.13
Office Room/Research Cubical/ 410.25 0.05 5.8 6.75
Rest Room 64.75 0.1 0.60 1.60
Stair 315.4 - - 0.90
Store 170 - - 3.15
3.1 Energy Consumption Table 4: Annual End Use Energy Break Down
Component Electricity(kWh)
Heating 0
Cooling 0
Interior lighting 5823.74
Interior Equipment 3532.39
EAT-System Blower Fan 1390.55
Total 10746.69
523
Design Strategies to Energy Efficient Building in Kathmandu Valley -A Case Study of CES-Zero Energy
Building at Institute of Engineering.
118.1 kWh monthly to operate EAT –System air blower and generates average effective usable solar electricity of
fan and finally results to consume total electricity within 29.5 kWh in a day to fulfill the existing building’s 29.4
range of about 824.22 kWh to 919.90 kWh monthly kWh of average daily energy demand and 10746.69 kWh
throughout the year.It demands peak electricity load of annual end use energy demand see figure 4.6 for monthly
about 1.82 kW average monthly for interior lighting, effective energy output and energy demand comparison.
0.66 kW average monthly for interior equipment and It Shows that 6.5kWp PV system on average 5.11 hours
0.16 kW average monthly to operate EAT system air of peak sun with 90% of overall system efficiency could
blower fan finally results to demand total peak generate excess electricity of about 24 kWh annually
electricity of about 2.64 kW average monthly and hence satisfy 100% building’s annual end use energy
throughout the year.So that it results to consume demand and balance all annual utility costs for electricity,
electricity of about 5823.74 kWh annually for Interior and proven to reduce the footprint of the end use energy
lighting i.e. about 54 % of total annual consumption, so the whole building system is 100% efficient zero
3532.39 kWh annually for interior equipment i.e. about energy building in terms of end use energy .i.e. Net On
33 % of total annual consumption and 1390.55 kWh site Energy Production=Net Energy Consumption.See
annually to operate EAT-System air blower fan i.e. figure-8 and figure-9 for monthly and annual energy
about 13 % of total annual consumption but no generation by installed solar panel and See figure-10 for
electricity end use for heating and cooling .It utilizes energy generation and energy demand comparison.
ground sourced thermal energy i.e. Geo-thermal energy
to fulfill the heating and cooling demand of building so
there is no heating and cooling electrical load in its
annual end use energy.See figure-5 and figure -6 for
monthly end energy use break down consumption and
monthly peak energy end use breaks down and see
figure-7 and table-4 for annual end energy use break
down consumption of study project.
524
Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference, 2017
525
Design Strategies to Energy Efficient Building in Kathmandu Valley -A Case Study of CES-Zero Energy
Building at Institute of Engineering.
rated efficient electrical appliance with smart control energy modeling at initial stages for construction of
system. It shows that the future of implemented design energy efficient buildings and its necessity for
strategies of study project as energy efficiency measures sustainable construction from planning phase to project
for efficient building system is bright and applicable to finalization and decision making phase.For the
future building without any technical difficulties in purpose,They should be encouraged to design and
composite climate of Kathmandu valley.It helps to control built environment considering design strategies
enable the environment and resources to be sustained and energy efficiency measures considering building
for future generations ,control rising energy costs, orientation, internal room layout, window placement,
reduce environmental footprints, increase the value and sizing and shading, use of insulation, ventilation,use of
competitiveness of buildings addressing key energy heat absorbing building materials, landscaping, use of
issues in context. energy efficient appliances and smart control system,
recycling of material and renewable energy resources
etc. as in study project.From the study following
5. Recommendations recommendation can be made at least for energy
efficient building in Kathmandu valley.
5.1 Recommendations for Improvement in
performance of Existing CES –ZEB
• The orientation of the building should be along
The following recommendation could be made for east and west direction as such if there is no other
improvement in better performance of existing site constriction on orientation to take advantages
CES-ZEB. of active and passive system for sustainable energy
solution.
• The external door and window are made of
material with high U -value these are the reason • For the general construction of wall, cavity wall
behind un-favorable heat loss and heat gain so it with lower U-value behaves as good thermal mass
is recommended to use double glazed window or and provides good insulation against heat loss.
window with glaze up to 12mm thick at least and
double door for good thermal performance as • Double glazed window has low U-value and
well as sound insulation resulting to save 10% of recommended to use instead of single glazed
total building end use energy. window because thermal performance of these
window are better than single glazed window.
• For air conditioning and ventilation, the Beside thermal insulation,It also provides sound
EAT-System can extend to maintain comfort insulation.
indoors to other room that are often occupy.
• The household should have at least one renewable
• For better performance of Solar PV-system,The energy technology such as solar water heater or
solar panel should be cleaned and maintained solar PV installed at their buildings with building
regularly for better exposure to the solar radiation integrated photo voltaic system(BIPVS) and
and also the whole system should be maintained building energy management system(BEMS)for
to the good and workable state. effective use of green energy.
5.2 Recommendations for Designers and • The EAT-System should be promoted for efficient
Engineers way of heating ventilation and Air conditioning
(HVAC)system to condition space to maintain
Based on study and analysis, the designers and comfort indoor.
Engineers are the influential body for the energy
efficient building construction. They are the one who • Less energy efficient appliances should be
can influence the clients and change the ongoing pattern replaced by more energy efficient one with smart
of construction of buildings. The Designers and control system in household so as to reduce its
Engineers should be made aware of the benefits of annual operating costs by 10%.
526
Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference, 2017
• Window Area - Investigate optimal window areas [11] American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
for the combined impact on heating, cooling and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Standard 62.1-
2004,ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality.
day lighting. 2006.
• HVAC Controls – HVAC control strategies that [12] American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
control heating and cooling set points based on Conditioning Engineers. Advanced energy design guide
for office building. 2004.
occupancy
[13] American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
• Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Risk Conditioning Engineers. Handbook of fundamentals.
Analysis-Analysis based on cost for various 2009.
options to incorporate it as optimum design [14] American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
strategies Conditioning Engineers. Hvac applications handbook.
2004.
527