2017 EMC Fundamentals Guide
2017 EMC Fundamentals Guide
PRESENTED BY
FUNDAMENTALS
GUIDE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EMC Equipment
Manufacturers 6
Basic EMC Concepts 9
KENNETH WYATT
Wyatt Technical Services LLC
REFERENCE SECTION
Common Commercial EMC Standards 20
Military Related Documents 25
and Standards
Aerospace Standards 26
Automotive Electromagnetic 27
Compatibility (EMC) Standards
Medical Electrical Equipment 30
and System Standards
References 32
(article links, books, mini guides, websites,
& LinkedIn groups)
Introduction
The following chart is a quick reference guide of test equipment and includes everything you’ll need from the
bare minimum required for key evaluation testing, probing, and troubleshooting, to setting up a full in-house
pre-compliance or full compliance test lab. The list includes ampliers, antennas, current probes, ESD simulators,
LISNs, near field probes, RF signal generators, spectrum analyzers, EMI receivers, and TEM cells. Equipment rental
companies are also listed. The products listed can help you evaluate radiated and conducted emissions, radiated
and conducted immunity and a host of other immunity tests, such as ESD and EFT.
RF Signal Generators
Conducted Immunity
Pre-Compliance Test
Radiated Immunity
Manufacturer Contact Information - URL
Rental Companies
Near Field Probes
ESD Simulators
Current Probes
Amplifiers
TEM Cells
Antennas
LISNs
A.H. Systems http://www.ahsystems.com X X X X
Aaronia AG http://www.aaronia.com X X X X
Advanced Test
http://www.atecorp.com X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Equipment Rentals
Amplifier Research (AR) https://www.arworld.us X X X X X X X X
Anritsu http://www.anritsu.com X X X
Electro Rent http://www.electrorent.com X X X X X X X X X
EM Test http://www.emtest.com/home.php X X X
EMC Partner https://www.emc-partner.com X X
Empower RF Systems http://www.empowerrf.com X X
Emscan http://www.emscan.com X
Fischer Custom
http://www.fischercc.com X X X X
Communications
Gauss Instruments https://www.gauss-instruments.com/en/ X
Haefley-Hippotronics http://www.haefely-hipotronics.com X X
Instrument Rental Labs http://www.testequip.com X X X X X X X X X
Instruments For
http://www.ifi.com X X X
Industry (IFI)
Keysight Technologies http://www.keysight.com/main/home.jspx?cc=US&lc=eng X X X X X
Microlease https://www.microlease.com/us/home X X X X X X X X X
Milmega http://www.milmega.co.uk X X X
Narda/PMM http://www.narda-sts.it/narda/default_en.asp X X X X X X X
Noiseken http://www.noiseken.com X X X
Ophir RF http://ophirrf.com X X
Pearson Electronics http://www.pearsonelectronics.com X
Rigol Technologies https://www.rigolna.com X X X X X
Rohde & Schwarz https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/home_48230.html X X X X X X X X X X
Siglent Technologies http://siglentamerica.com X X X X
Signal Hound https://signalhound.com X X X X
TekBox Technologies https://www.tekbox.net X X X X X
Tektronix http://www.tek.com X X X
Teseq http://www.teseq.com/en/index.php X X X X X X X
Test Equity https://www.testequity.com/leasing/ X X X X X X X X X
Thermo Keytek https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html X X
Thurlby Thandar
http://www.aimtti.us X X X
(AIM-TTi)
Toyotech (Toyo) https://toyotechus.com/emc-electromagnetic-compatibility/ X X X X X X
TPI http://www.rf-consultant.com X
Transient Specialists http://www.transientspecialists.com X X X
TRSRenTelCo https://www.trs-rentelco.com/SubCategory/EMC_Test_Equipment.aspx X X X X X X X X X
Vectawave Technology http://vectawave.com X
Windfreak Technologies https://windfreaktech.com X
Ceramic Capacitors
Exhibit low parasitic capacitance and
superior EMI filtering capabilities
Magnetics
Broad range of custom, application-
specific solutions electromagnetic intregated solutions.
Power Filters
Ideal to filter the AC or DC power
entering your system to prevent
radiated or conducted EMI
Innovative solutions from components
Specialty Connectors to complex assemblies.
Custom connectors can be
designed to meet RTCA/DO-160
Section 22 Lighting Strike
ure, the impedance of the return plane results in small volt- References
age drops due to multiple simultaneous switching noise
(SSN) by the ICs. These voltage drops induce common 1. Bogatin, Signal Integrity - Simplified, Prentice-Hall,
noise currents to flow all over the return (or reference) 2009.
plane and hence, couple into the various signal traces.
2. Morrison, Grounding and Shielding - Circuits and In-
Besides SSN, common mode currents can also be created terference, Wiley, 2016.
by gaps in return planes, poorly terminated cable shields,
or unbalanced transmission line geometry. The problem is 3. Morrison, Digital Circuit Boards - Mach 1 GHz, Wiley,
that these harmonic currents tend to escape out along the 2012.
outside of shielded I/O or power cables and radiate. These
currents can be very small, on the order of μA. It takes just 4. Smith and Bogatin, Principles of Power Integrity for
5 to 8 μA of current to fail the FCC class B test limit. PDN Design, Prentice-Hall, 2017.
STRATION IS OP
EGI EN
R RO
M AG
N E T I C C O MP A T I B
I LI
TY
,S
!
T
EC
IG
EL
NA
N
LA
E S YM POS I U M O
ND
P OW E R I N
Your Port for EMC+SIPI Compliance
TEG
EE
8I
R
1
IT
20
WE’RE ONLINE!
WE'RE ONLINE!
We continue our innovation for delivering top technical
We continue our innovation for
content featuring the Online EMC+SIPI.
delivering top technical content
featuring the Online EMC+SIPI.
Can’t join us in-person?
Can’t join us in-person?
Watch presentations ON DEMAND from the Symposium
Watch presentations LIVE or on
demand from the Symposium in
in Long Beach or your computer (or phone, or tablet!)
Long Beach on your computer
Chat with other attendees, ask presenters questions, and
(or phone, or tablet!) Chat with
other attendees, ask presenters
learn the latest in EMC and signal & power integrity from
questions, and learn the latest
in EMC and signal & power
anywhere. It’s up to you how to attend!
integrity from anywhere. It’s up
to you how to attend!
Introduction
While unrealistic to discuss all aspects of product design in a single article, I’ll try to describe the most common design
issues I find in the hundreds of client products I’ve had a chance to work on. These issues generally include PC board
design, cables, shielding, and filtering. More detailed information may be found in the Reference section below.
As previously mentioned, the top three product failures I run into include (1) radiated emissions, (2) radiated sus-
ceptibility, and (3) electrostatic discharge. Other failures can include things like conducted emissions, electrically fast
transient, conducted susceptibility, and electrical surge. Most of these last items are also the result of the same poor
product designs, which cause the top three failures.
NOTE: I prefer to avoid the word “ground” in this article or in my consulting practice. The reason is that there are too many misinterpretations,
which can also lead to EMC failures. It’s much more clear to use power and power return, and signal and signal return - or just “return plane” or
reference plane. Finally, cable shields or shielded enclosures are “bonded” together - not “grounded”. The only exception is the so called “safety
ground” or earth ground. But these have nothing at all to do with proper EMC design - just personal safety against electrical shock. I suppose
the one exception would be the earth ground connection on a three-wire power line filter. Also, occasionally, there will be an earth ground on a
PC board - especially for power supplies, but again, connecting a product or system to earth ground will not improve EMI, due to the very high
inductance (length) of the wire.
DESIGN FOR EMC FR4 dielectric, the speed is about half that at 6 inches
COMPLIANCE ESSENTIALS per nanosecond. Refer to Reference 1, 2, and 3 for more
information on the physics of signal propagation through
PC Board Design PC boards.
The single most important factor in achieving EMC/EMI
compliance revolves around the printed circuit board de-
sign. It’s important to note that not all information sources
(books, magazine articles, or manufacturer’s application
notes) are correct when it comes to designing PC boards
for EMC compliance - especially sources older than 10
years, or so. In addition, many “rules of thumb” are based
on specific designs, which may not apply to future or
leveraged designs. Some rules of thumb were just plain
lucky to have worked.
PC boards must be designed from a physics point of view Figure 1 - A propagating wave along a microstrip with reference plane. Figure,
and the most important consideration is that high fre- courtesy Eric Bogatin.
quency signals, clocks, and power distribution networks
(PDNs) must be designed as transmission lines. This In order to satisfy both the circuit and field theory view-
means that the signal or energy transferred is propagated points, we now see the importance of adjacent power
as an electromagnetic wave. PDNs are a special case, and power return planes, as well as adjacent signal and
as they must carry both DC current and be able to supply signal return planes. PDN design also requires both bulk
energy for switching transients with minimal simultane- and decoupling “energy storage” capacitors. The bulk ca-
ous switching noise (SSN). The characteristic impedance pacitors 4.7 to 10 μF, typ.) are usually placed near the
of PDNs is designed with very low impedance (0.1 to 1.0 power input connector and the decoupling capacitors (1
Ohms, typically). Signal traces, on the other hand, are to 10 nF, typ) nearest the noisiest switching devices - and
usually designed with a characteristic impedance of 50 most importantly, with minimal trace length connecting
to 100 Ohms. these from the power pins to signal return plane. Ideally,
all decoupling capacitors should be mounted right over
The previous article introduced the concept of the circuit (or close to) the connecting vias and multiple vias should
theory and field theory viewpoints. A successful PC board be used for each capacitor to reduce series inductance.
design accounts for both viewpoints. Circuit theory sug-
gests that current flows in loops from source to load and Signal or power routed referenced to a single plane will
back to the source. In many cases of product failure, the always have a defined return path back to the source.
return path has not been well defined and in some cases, Figure 2 shows how the electromagnetic field stays with-
the path is broken. Breaks or gaps in the return path are in the dielectric on both sides of the return plane. The
major causes of radiated emissions, radiated susceptibil- dielectric is not shown for clarity.
ity, and ESD failures.
signal vias and leakage and radiation out the board edg- multiple connecting vias between the two return planes
es as shown. in order to guarantee the lowest impedance path back to
the source. The EMI performance will be significantly im-
proved using this, or similar designs. In many cases, sim-
ply rearranging the stack-up is enough to pass emissions.
Note that when running signals between the top and bot-
tom layers, you’ll need to include “stitching” vias between
the return planes and stitching capacitors between the
power and power return planes right at the point of signal
penetration in order to minimize the return path. Ideally,
Figure 3 - A signal trace passing through two reference planes. If the reference these stitching vias should be located within 1 to 2 mm of
planes are the same potential (signal or power returns, for example), then stitch- each signal via.
ing vias next to the signal via should be sufficient. However, if the planes are
different potentials (power and return, for example), then stitching capacitors Other Tips - Other design tips include placement of all
must be installed very close to the signal via. Lack of a defined return path power and I/O connectors along one edge of the board.
will cause the electromagnetic field to leak around the dielectric, as shown, and This tends to reduce the high frequency voltage drop be-
couple into other signal vias or radiate out board edges. tween connectors, thus minimizing cable radiation. Also,
segregation of digital, analog, and RF circuits is a good
For example, let’s take a look at a poor (but very typical) idea, because this minimizes cross coupling between
board stack-up that I see often. See Figure 4. noisy and sensitive circuitry.
Figure 10 - Penetrating the shield with a cable defeats the shield. This example
shows how external energy sources can induce noise currents in I/O cables, which
can potentially disrupt internal circuitry. The reverse is also true, where internal
noise currents can flow out the cable and cause emissions failures. Figure, cour-
tesy Henry Ott.
Figure 13 - A general purpose filter typically used for power supply input filtering.
Figure 11 - Result of a penetrating cable through a shielded enclosure, because For general purpose filtering of signals, the handy chart
of un-bonded I/O connectors to the shielded enclosure. of possible filter topologies may be found in Reference
9 and is reproduced here in Figure 14. The appropriate
Cable Shield Terminations - Another potential issue is topology depends on the source and load impedances.
if the I/O cable uses a “pigtail” connection to the connec- If these impedances are not known, then either the “PI”
tor shell. Ideally, cable shields should be terminated in a or “T” topology may be used (#3 or #5 on the chart, re-
360-degree bond for lowest impedance. Pigtails degrade spectively).
the cable shield effectiveness by introducing a relatively
high impedance. For example, a 1-inch pigtail connection
has 12 Ohms impedance at 100 MHz and gets worse the
higher you go in frequency. This is especially problem-
atic for HDMI cables, because the HDMI working group
(http://www.hdmi.org) failed to specify the method for ter-
minating the cable shield to the connector.
Filtering
I won’t go into very much detail here, because Interference
Technology has an excellent EMI Filter Guide free for the
downloading (see Reference 8). Suffice to say, filters, as
well as transient protection, are important at power and I/O
connectors. Typically, these will be common mode topol-
ogies, as shown in Figure 12. Most signal-level common
mode chokes may be obtained in surface mount packag-
ing. Power chokes are much larger to handle the current
and may be obtained as either surface mount or through-
hole mount, depending on the current rating. Many Ether-
net connectors have built-in common mode filtering.
Figure 14 - Five common filter topologies, depending on the source and load im-
Figure 12 - A typical common mode filter used for I/O filtering. The two windings pedances. Figure, courtesy Würth Electronik.
are wound in opposite directions and so tend to cancel the common mode currents.
Ferrite or inductive components should not be used in se-
Power supply input filters are generally designed to sup- ries with the power pins of ICs, as this will only reduce the
press both differential and common mode currents. A typ- ability of the local decoupling capacitors to supply required
ical topology is shown in Figure 13. The “X” capacitor is energy during simultaneous switching of the IC output
designed to filter differential mode, while the CM choke stages with the resulting higher power supply noise.
and “Y” capacitors are designed to filter common mode.
The resistor shown is usually 100 kOhm and the purpose Ferrite Chokes - One common filter element usually
is merely to bleed off the line voltage stored on the capac- added to I/O cables is the ferrite choke. Ferrite chokes
itors to a safe level. come in either the clamp-on types or solid cores meant
Transient Protection
In order to protect internal circuitry from electrical tran-
sients, such as ESD, electrically fast transient (EFT), or
power line surge, due to lightning, transient protective
devices should be installed at all power and I/O ports.
These devices sense the transient and “clamp” the tran-
sient pulse to a specified clamp voltage.
Summary
Most EMC/EMI failures are due to poor shielding, pen-
etration of cables through shields, poor cable shield ter-
mination, poor filtering, and above all, poor PC board
layout and stack-up. Paying attention to these common
design faults will pay off with a lower risk of compliance
failures and result in lower project costs and schedule
slippage.
item.media
Additional ITEM Media Brands: Interference Technology | Electronics Cooling | Environmental Test & Design
COMMON COMMERCIAL EMC STANDARDS
MIL-HDBK-235-1C Military Operational Electromagnetic (HEMP) Protection for Ground-Based C41 Facilities Per-
Environment Profiles Part 1C General Guidance, 1 Oct forming Critical, Time-Urgent Missions Part 1 Fixed Facil-
2010. ities, 17 Jul 1998.
MIL-HDBK-237D Electromagnetic Environmental Effects MIL-STD-220C Test Method Standard Method of Inser-
and Spectrum Certification Guidance for the Acquisition tion Loss Measurement, 14 May 2009.
Process, 20 May 2005.
MIL-STD-331C Fuze and Fuze Components, Environ-
MIL-HDBK-240A Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation mental and Performance Tests for, 22 Jun 2009.
to Ordnance (HERO) Test Guide, 10 Mar 2011.
MIL-STD-449D Radio Frequency Spectrum Characteris-
MIL-HDBK-263B Electrostatic Discharge Control Hand- tics, Measurement of, 22 Feb 1973.
book for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, As-
semblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated MIL-STD-461F Requirements for the Control of Elec-
Explosive Devices), 31 Jul 1994. tromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems
and Equipment, 10 Dec 2007.
MIL-HDBK-274A Electrical Grounding for Aircraft Safety,
14 Nov 2011. MIL-STD-461G Requirements for the Control of Elec-
tromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems
MIL-HDBK-335 Management and Design Guidance and Equipment, 11 Dec 2015.
Electromagnetic Radiation Hardness for Air Launched
Ordnance Systems, Notice 4, 08 Jul 2008. MIL-STD-464C Electromagnetic Environmental Effects
Requirements for Systems, 01 Dec 2010.
MIL-HDBK-419A Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding for
Electronic Equipment and Facilities, 29 Dec 1987. MIL-STD-704E Aircraft Electric Power Characteristics, 12
Mar 2004.
MIL-HDBK-454B General Guidelines for Electronic
Equipment, 15 Apr 2007. MIL-STD-1310H Standard Practice for Shipboard Bond-
ing, Grounding, and Other Techniques for Electromagnet-
MIL-HDBK-1004-6 Lightning Protection, 30 May 1988. ic Compatibility Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Mitigation
and Safety, 17 Sep 2009.
MIL-HDBK-1195, Radio Frequency Shielded Enclosures,
30 Sep 1988. MIL-STD-1377 Effectiveness of Cable, Connector, and
Weapon Enclosure Shielding and Filters in Precluding
MIL-HDBK-1512 Electroexplosive Subsystems, Electri- Hazards of EM Radiation to Ordnance; Measurement of,
cally Initiated, Design Requirements and Test Methods, 20 Aug 1971.
30 Sep 1997.
MIL-STD-1399 Section 300B Interface Standard for Ship-
MIL-HDBK-1857 Grounding, Bonding and Shielding De- board Systems, Electric Power, Alternating Current, 24
sign Practices, 27 Mar 1998. Apr 2008.
15 Nov 1991. MIL-STD-1605 Procedures for Conducting DOD-STD-1399 Section 070 Part 1 D.C. Magnetic Field
a Shipboard Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Survey Environment, Notice 1, 30 Nov 1989.
(Surface Ships), 08 Oct 2009.
DoDI 3222.03 DoD Electromagnetic Environmental Ef-
MIL-STD-1686C Electrostatic Discharge Control Pro- fects (E3) Program, 24 Aug 2014.
gram for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, As-
semblies, and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated DoDD 4650.01 Policy and Procedures for Management
Explosive Devices). 25 Oct 1995. and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, 09 Jan 2009.
ADS-37A-PRF Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) DoDI 6055.11 Protecting Personnel from Electromagnet-
Performance and Verification Requirements, 28 May 1996. ic Fields, 19 Aug 2009.
AEROSPACE STANDARDS
AIAA Standards DO-363, Guidance for the Development of Portable
http://www.aiaa.org/default.aspx Electronic Devices (PED) Tolerance for Civil Aircraft
S-121-2009, Electromagnetic Compatibility Require- DO-307A, Aircraft Design and Certification for Portable
ments for Space Equipment and Systems Electronic Device (PED) Tolerance
DO-160G, Environmental Conditions and Test Proce- ARP 5583 – Guide to Certification of Aircraft in a High
dures for Airborne Equipment Intensity Radiation (HIRF) Environment http://stan-
dards.sae.org/arp5583/
DO-160G Change 1, Environmental Conditions and
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment
AUTOMOTIVE ELECTROMAGNETIC
COMPATIBILITY (EMC) STANDARDS
The following list of automotive EMC standards was developed by Dr. Todd Hubing, Professor Emeritus of Clemson
University Vehicular Electronics Lab (http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/auto/auto_emc_standards.html). A few of these
standards have been made public and are linked below, but many others are considered company confidential and
are only available to approved automotive vendors or test equipment manufacturers.
While several standards are linked on this list, an internet search may help locate additional documents that have
been made public. Permission to republish has been approved.
SAE (Automotive Emissions and Immunity) SAE (Automotive Emissions and Immunity) continued
Document Document
Title Title
Number Number
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurement Procedures and Limits Vehicle Electromagnetic Immunity–On-Board Transmitter
J551/12 Simulation (Cancelled August 2009)
J1113/1 for Components of Vehicles, Boats (Up to 15 M), and Machines
(Except Aircraft) (50 Hz to 18 Ghz) Vehicle Electromagnetic Immunity–Bulk Current Injection
J551/13 (Cancelled August 2009)
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurement Procedures and Limits
J1113/2 for Vehicle Components (Except Aircraft)–Conducted Immunity, 15
J551/15 Vehicle Electromagnetic Immunity–Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)
Hz to 250 kHz–All Leads
Electromagnetic Immunity – Off-Vehicle Source (Reverberation
Conducted Immunity, 250 kHz to 400 MHz, Direct Injection of
J1113/3 Radio Frequency (RF) Power (Cancelled August 2010) J551/16 Chamber Method) – Part 16 – Immunity to Radiated
Electromagnetic Fields
Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Fields-Bulk Current Injection
J1113/4 (BCI) Method J551/17 Vehicle Electromagnetic Immunity – Power Line Magnetic Fields
J1113/11 Immunity to Conducted Transients on Power Leads Function Performance Status Classification for EMC Immunity
J1812 Testing
Electrical Interference by Conduction and Coupling – Capacitive J2628 Characterization–Conducted Immunity
J1113/12 and Inductive Coupling via Lines Other than Supply Lines
Radiated Emissions (RE) Narrowband Data Analysis–Power
J2556 Spectral Density (PSD)
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurement Procedure for Vehicle
J1113/13 Components – Part 13: Immunity to Electrostatic Discharge GM
Document
Title
Number
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurement Procedure for Vehicle
J1113/21 Components – Part 21: Immunity to Electromagnetic Fields, 30
General Specification for Vehicles, Electromagnetic Compatibility
MHz to 18 GHz, Absorber-Lined Chamber GMW3091 (EMC)-Engl; Revision H; Supersedes GMI 12559 R and GMI 12559 V
Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Fields; 10 kHz to 200 General Specification for Electrical/Electronic Components
J1113/24 MHz–Crawford TEM Cell and 10 kHz to 5 GHz–Wideband TEM Cell and Subsystems, Electromagnetic Compatibility-Engl; Revision
(Cancelled August 2010) GMW3097 H; Supersedes GMW12559, GMW3100, GMW12002R AND
GMW12002V
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurement Procedure for Vehicle
J1113/26 Components – Immunity to AC Power Line Electric Fields General Specification for Electrical/Electronic Components
and Subsystems, Electromagnetic Compatibility Global EMC
Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurements Procedure for Vehicle GMW3103 Component/Subsystem Validation Acceptance Process-Engl;
J1113/27 Components – Part 27: Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Revision F; Contains Color; Replaces GMW12003, GMW12004 and
Fields – Mode Stir Reverberation Method GMW3106
Instruction specification of test method for E/E- Toyota TSC7006G-4.4.4 Mobile Phone Antenna Nearby Test (835 MHz ...)
Mercedes A 211 000 42 99
components
Toyota TSC7018G Static Electricity Test
Mercedes AV EMV Electric aggregate and electronics in cars
Toyota TSC7025G-5 TEM Cell Test (1 to 400 MHz)
EMC requirements and tests of E/E-systems
Mercedes MBN 10284-2 Free Field Immunity Test (20 MHz to 1 GHz AM,
(component test procedures) Toyota TSC7025G-6
0.8 to 2 GHz PM)
Mercedes MBN 22100-2 Electric / electronic elements, devices in trucks Toyota TSC7025G-7 Strip Line Test (20 - 400 MHz)
General specification of environment tests on Toyota TSC7026G-3.4 Narrow Band Emissions
Mitsubishi ES-X82010
automotive electronic equipment Toyota TSC7203G Voltage Drop / Micro Drops
EMC requirements (instruction concerning vehicle Toyota TSC7508G-3.3.1 Conductive Noise in FM and TV Bands
Nissan 28401 NDS02
and electrical ...)
Toyota TSC7508G-3.3.2 Conductive noise in LW, AM and SW Bands
Nissan 28400 NDS03 Low frequency surge resistance of electronic parts Toyota TSC7508G-3.3.3 Radiated Noise in FM and TV Bands
Nissan 28400 NDS04 Burst and Impulse Waveforms Toyota TSC7508G-3.3.4 Radiated Noise in AM, SW, and LW Bands
Immunity against low frequency surge (induction Toyota TSC7203G Engineering standard (ABS-TRC computers)
Nissan 28400 NDS07
surge) of electronic parts
Toyota TXC7315G Electrostatic Discharge (Gap Method)
Peugeot B217110 Load Dump Pulses
Electronic Component - Subsystem Electromagnetic
Porsche AV EMC EN EMC Requirements Visteon ES-XU3F-1316-AA Compatibility (EMC) Requirements and Test
EMC Requirements (electric and electronics Procedures
PSA B21 7090
equipment)
Volvo EMC Requirements EMC requirements for 12V and 24V systems
EMC requirements (electric and electronics Volkswagen VW TL 801 01 Electric and electronic components in cars
PSA B21 7110
equipment)
Volkswagen VW TL 820 66 Conducted Interference
Physical environment of electrical and electronic
Renault 36.00.400 EMC requirements of electronic components - bulk
equipments Volkswagen VW TL 821 66
current injection (BCI)
EMC requirements (cars and electrical / electronic
Renault 36.00.808 Volkswagen VW TL 823 66 Coupled Interference on Sensor Cables
components)
Scania TB1400 EMC Requirements Volkswagen VW TL 824 66 Immunity Against Electrostatic Discharge
Scania TB1700 Load Dump Test Volkswagen VW TL 965 Short-Distance Interference Suppression
Tables 1 and 2 below list the collateral (vertical) and particular (product specific) standards within the IEC/ISO 60601
family1. Requirements in the particular standards take precedence over those in the General Safety Standard (IEC
60601-1) or the Collateral Standards (IEC 60601-1-X). Table 3 list several other relevant standards. Refer the stan-
dard for the exact title.
REFERENCES
(ARTICLE LINKS, BOOKS, MINI GUIDES, WEBSITES, & LINKEDIN GROUPS)
Electromagnetic Compatibility
(EMC) Pocket Guide
Wyatt & Jost
SciTech Publishing, 2013.
A handy pocket-sized reference guide to EMC.
INDEX OF ADVERTISERS