0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views

Lecture09 - 5. Feedback Control Systems-2. Ziegler-Nichols Rules For Tuning PID Controllers

The document discusses the Ziegler-Nichols rules for tuning PID controllers. There are two methods - the first involves approximating the plant transfer function as a first-order system and uses step response data. The second method increases the controller gain K until output oscillations are observed, then uses the critical gain K and oscillation period P to determine PID parameters. Neither method applies if the plant is unstable without an actuator. The root-locus method can also determine the critical gain K and oscillation frequency ω for the second method.

Uploaded by

jon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views

Lecture09 - 5. Feedback Control Systems-2. Ziegler-Nichols Rules For Tuning PID Controllers

The document discusses the Ziegler-Nichols rules for tuning PID controllers. There are two methods - the first involves approximating the plant transfer function as a first-order system and uses step response data. The second method increases the controller gain K until output oscillations are observed, then uses the critical gain K and oscillation period P to determine PID parameters. Neither method applies if the plant is unstable without an actuator. The root-locus method can also determine the critical gain K and oscillation frequency ω for the second method.

Uploaded by

jon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

5. Feedback Control Systems - 2.

Ziegler-Nichols Rules for Tuning PID Controllers (1/3)

[From Ogata's Modern 
Control Engineering]

If the plant is not known or so complicated that its mathematical model cannot be easily obtained, then an
analytical or computational approach to the design of a PID controller is not possible. Hence, we need to
resort to experimental approaches to the tuning of PID controllers, leading to one of them, called Ziegler-
Nichols rules. In fact, the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules ("as a heuristic method") give an educated guess
for the parameter values and provide a starting point for fine tuning, rather than giving the final settings
for 𝐾 , 𝑇 , 𝑇 . Ziegler-Nichols rules are the best in disturbance rejection, but are not necessarily optimal.
[Influences of individual control gains on control systems performance]

First Method: The response of the plant to a unit-step input is experimentally obtained. If the plant
involves neither integrator(s) nor dominant complex-conjugate poles, then such a unit-step response
curve may look S-shaped. Then, the transfer function 𝐶 𝑠 /𝑈 𝑠 may be approximated by a 1st-order
system with a transport lag.
⎯⎯⎯ 𝑒 ⎯⎯⎯⎯
where L implies a delay time and T denotes the time constant. Then, the parameters of PID controller can
be set according to Table 8-1. Note that the PID controller tuned by the 1st method of Ziegler-Nichols
rules gives
/
𝐷 𝑠 𝐾 1 ⎯⎯⎯ 𝑇 𝑠 1.2 ⎯ 1 ⎯⎯⎯ 0.5𝐿𝑠 0.6𝑇 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
The resulting PID controller has a pole at the origin and double zeros at 𝑠 1/𝐿.

Lecture09 Page 1
Example: Comparison of P‐, PD‐ and PID Controls (1a/4)

𝐷 𝑠 𝐾 1 ⎯⎯⎯ 𝑇 𝑠 where 
𝐾 19, 𝑇 2, 𝑇 4/19 were 
considered.

[𝐾 1 and 𝐾 0 (No noise)] [𝐾 1 and 𝐾 0.2 (25% Noise added)]

                                   Unit‐Step Responses of the Closed‐Loop Control System without PID Controller (i.e., 𝐷 𝑠 1)                                    

First Method of Ziegler-Nichols Rules

𝐿 0.5 𝑇 8.5 0.5 8

𝑇 8
⎯⎯ ⎯⎯⎯ 16
𝐿 0.5

• P-Controller: 𝑲𝒑 𝟏𝟔
𝑲𝒑
• PI-Controller: 𝑲𝒑 𝟏𝟒. 𝟒, 𝑻𝒊 𝟏. 𝟔𝟕 → 𝑲𝒊 ⎯⎯ 𝟖. 𝟔𝟐
𝑻𝒊
𝑲𝒑
• PID-Controller: 𝑲𝒑 𝟏𝟗. 𝟐, 𝑻𝒊 𝟏, 𝑻𝒅 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓 → 𝑲𝒊 ⎯⎯ 𝟏𝟗. 𝟐, 𝑲𝒅 𝑲𝒑 ⋅ 𝑻𝒅 𝟒. 𝟖
𝑻𝒊

Lecture09 Page 2
Example: Comparison of P‐, PD‐ and PID Controls (1b/4)

(1) P-Control

(2) PI-Control

(3) PID-control

Lecture09 Page 3
5. Feedback Control Systems - 2. Ziegler-Nichols Rules for Tuning PID Controllers (2/3)
Second Method: Considering the P-control action only (i.e., 𝐷 𝑠 𝐾 ), increase 𝐾 from zero to 𝐾
where the output first exhibits sustained oscillations. If the output does not exhibit sustained oscillations
for whatever value 𝐾 may take, then this method does not apply. The critical gain 𝐾 and the
corresponding period of the response 𝑃 are experimentally determined. Then, the parameters for PID
controller can be set according to the formula in Table 8-2.

Note that the PID controller tuned by the 2nd method of Ziegler-Nichols rules gives
1 1 𝑠 4/𝑃
𝐷 𝑠 𝐾 1 ⎯⎯⎯ 𝑇 𝑠 0.6𝐾 1 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 0.125𝑃 𝑠 0.075 𝐾 𝑃 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
𝑇𝑠 0.5𝑃 𝑠 𝑠
The resulting PID controller has a pole at the origin and double zeros at 𝑠 4/𝑃 .

Note also that if there is a known mathematical model for a system (such as TF), then the root-locus
method can be used to find the critical gain 𝐾 and the frequency of the sustained oscillations 𝜔
2𝜋/𝑃 (at the intersection between the root-locus branch and 𝑗𝜔 axis). If the root-locus branches do not
cross the 𝑗𝜔 axis, this method does not apply.

Remarks: Neither of Ziegler-Nichols rules can be applied if the plant is unstable and without an
actuator – For example, 𝐺𝐻 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯. However, if the plant includes an actuator, the 2nd method
can be tried – For example, 𝐺𝐻 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.

Lecture09 Page 4
5. Feedback Control Systems - 2. Ziegler-Nichols Rules for Tuning PID Controllers (3/3)

Example: Open-loop transfer function is given as 𝐺𝐻 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯. Show that the 2nd method of
Ziegler-Nichols rules yields the PID controller as
1 1 𝑠 1.4235
𝐷 𝑠 𝐾 1 ⎯⎯⎯ 𝑇 𝑠 18 1 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 0.35124𝑠 6.3223 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
𝑇𝑠 1.405𝑠 𝑠
⎯⎯
where 𝐾 30 and 𝜔 √5 so that 𝑃 ⎯⎯ 2.8099. Hence, 𝐾
⎯⎯ 0.6𝐾 18, 𝑇 0.5𝑃

1.405, 𝑇 0.125𝑃 0.35124.

Lecture09 Page 5

You might also like