Pattern-Reconfigurable Yagi-Uda Antenna Based On Liquid Metal
Pattern-Reconfigurable Yagi-Uda Antenna Based On Liquid Metal
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.3005713, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
0018-926X (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Macquarie University. Downloaded on July 13,2020 at 18:10:50 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.3005713, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
(a)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. Simulated current distributions at: (a) 10.8 GHz, (b) 12.25 GHz.
(b)
Fig. 2. Simulated element performance under normal incidence for two states:
(a) magnitude, (b) phase.
0018-926X (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Macquarie University. Downloaded on July 13,2020 at 18:10:50 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.3005713, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
(a)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5. Geometry of four proposed dual-linear polarized 1-bit RTA elements
with biasing circuits: (a) perspective view, (b) top view.
(b)
Fig. 8. Photograph of the fabricated 1-bit dual-linear polarized RTA: (a) the
assembled prototype, (b) measurement setup in the near-field anechoic
chamber.
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. Simulated element performance for four states without biasing circuits
under a y-polarized normally incident wave: (a) magnitude, (b) phase. Note
that the first and second numbers refer to the operating states of the x- and y-
polarized dipoles, respectively.
Fig. 7. Simulated magnitude performance of the element with and without (a) (b)
biasing circuits. Fig. 10. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the y-polarized
broadside beam at 12.2 GHz: (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.
Fig. 2, it is obvious that the second receiver-transmitter structure does
not noticeably affect the element performance. The dual-resonance dipole, while a +1.3/−1.3 V DC biasing voltage is applied to both ends
feature is clearly observed, and the magnitude insertion losses are 2.4 of the active receiving dipole to control the diode states. The quarter-
dB and 0.9 dB at 10.8 GHz and 12.25 GHz respectively. The wavelength transformer on the receiving layer and open-ended radial
independent phase controlling capability with 1-bit phase quantization stubs on the film are designed to choke the RF leakage. The biasing
is also validated. The deviations of the element performance are point is positioned close to the zero point of the electric field at active
negligible when changing the operating state to the other polarization. receiving dipole to minimize the influence of the bias lines on the RF
The details of the proposed four dual-linear polarized 1-bit RTA performance. The simulated magnitude performance of the element
elements with biasing circuits are also presented in Fig. 5. There are with and without biasing circuits is compared in Fig. 7. Good isolation
two independent bias lines in each element, one for each polarization. of RF and DC signals at the center frequency is observed. Moreover,
For each receiver-transmitter structure, the middle portion of the the additional element insertion loss caused by the biasing circuits is
active receiving dipole is grounded through the passive transmitter small and deemed acceptable. At the design frequency, the simulated
0018-926X (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Macquarie University. Downloaded on July 13,2020 at 18:10:50 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.3005713, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
TABLE II
BEAM DIRECTIONS FOR DUAL-LINEAR POLARIZATION AT 12.2 GHZ
Beam Direction
Experiment
y-polarized x-polarized
I 30°, E-plane 0°, Broadside
II 30°, E-plane 30°, H-plane
III 50°, E-plane 30°, H-plane
Fig. 11. Measured radiation patterns of the y-polarized scanned beams in the
E-plane at 12.2 GHz.
Fig. 13. Measured y-polarized radiation patterns for experiment I and II at 12.2
GHz.
Fig. 12. Measured radiation patterns of the y-polarized scanned beams in the
H-plane at 12.2 GHz.
TABLE I
PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS OF SCANNED BEAMS
Beam E-plane H-plane
Direction Gain/dBi Side Lobe/dB Gain/dBi Side Lobe/dB
0° 18.3 −16.2 18.3 −16.2
10° 17.7 −12.0 17.7 −16.1
Fig. 14. Measured x-polarized radiation patterns for experiment II and III at
20° 16.9 −11.8 17.6 −10.7
12.2 GHz.
30° 16.7 −8.2 16.6 −9.0
40° 16.1 −8.6 15.1 −4.0 B. Radiation at Broadside and Beam-scanning Performance for
50° 15.4 −8.0 14.8 −4.0 Linear-polarization
The 1-bit RTA prototype illuminated by a y-polarized feed was
insertion loss is 1.0 dB. The cross-polarization performance of the measured in a near-field anechoic chamber. The simulated and
element is presented as well. At 12.25 GHz, the cross-polarization measured gains of the RTA versus frequency are presented in Fig. 9.
level is slightly higher but still below −15 dB. At 10.8 GHz, the cross- The measured maximum gain at 12.2 GHz is 18.3 dBi with an aperture
polarization performance deteriorates due to the influence of the efficiency of 22.6%, while the measured 3-dB gain bandwidth is
grounded via-holes. 11.5%. The difference compared to the simulated gain (19.5 dBi) is
mainly attributed to the additional loss caused by edge diffraction,
III. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION fabrication errors and equivalent circuit modeling errors for the PIN
diodes. The simulated and measured broadside co- and cross-
A. Prototype and Fabrication polarized radiation patterns in both principal planes at 12.2 GHz are
shown in Fig. 10. The measured main beams are in good agreement
Based on the proposed 1-bit dual-linear polarized RTA element, a
with simulation. The measured half-power beamwidths (HPBWs) are
10×10 RTA prototype was designed and fabricated using printed
11.4°and 11.6°in the E- and H-plane, respectively. The measured first
circuit board (PCB) technology, as shown in Fig. 8. The effective
side lobe in the E-plane is −16.2 dB, and the cross-polarization level
aperture of the RTA is 120 mm×120 mm with 400 PIN diodes in total,
is −17.6 dB, which is higher than the simulated results. The main
which provide phase reconfigurability. A linear-polarized horn
reason for the discrepancy is the higher cross-pol component of the
antenna illuminates the aperture with an equivalent cos qθ (q = 5.7)
element due to the leakage currents on the bias lines, as shown in Fig.
pattern, where the F/D ratio is 0.78. To provide the phase controlling
7, which are not included in the array simulation model.
capability for each polarization, there are 8 40-pin connectors located
The measured radiation patterns for the y-polarized scanned beams
on the sides of the array, which are connected to the steering-logic
in the E-plane and H-plane are plotted in Figs. 11 and 12, respectively.
board. For each linear polarization, the phase shift of each element,
The key parameters are summarized in Table I. It is obvious that all
and thus, the states of PIN diodes, can be determined using the array
the measured radiation patterns of the scanned beams up to 50°are
theory to collimate a pencil beam in a given direction.
pointed in the desired directions. As expected, the measured gain
0018-926X (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Macquarie University. Downloaded on July 13,2020 at 18:10:50 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.3005713, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
decreases with increasing scan angles. For example, the scan gain loss switches,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 57, no. 8, pp.1874-
is 2.9 dB and 3.5 dB for a 50°beam in the E-plane and H-plane, 1884, Aug. 2009.
[7] J. Lau and S. V. Hum, “Analysis and characterization of a multipole
respectively. The measured side lobe levels for scanned beams in the reconfigurable transmitarray element,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
E-plane are all below −8.0 dB. It is noticed that the side lobe level vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 70-79, Jan. 2011.
corresponding to the 50°scanned beam in the H-plane is as high as [8] J. R. Reis, R. F. S. Caldeirinha, A. Hammoudeh, and N. Copner,
−4.0 dB, which is mainly caused by the small-size aperture as well as “Electronically reconfigurable FSS-inspired transmitarray for 2-D beam
the antenna support frame blockage. Overall, the measured results steering,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4880-4885,
Sep. 2017.
demonstrate that the proposed 1-bit RTA can achieve two- [9] M. Sazegar, Y. Zheng, H. Maune, M. Nikfalazar, and R. Jakoby, “Beam
dimensional beam scanning up to 50°with good high-gain radiation steering transmitarray using tunable frequency selective surface with
performance. integrated ferroelectric varactors”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
60, no.12, pp.5690-5699, Dec. 2012.
C. Independent Beam Scanning Capability for Dual-linear [10] W. Pan, C. Huang, X. Ma and X. Luo, “An amplifying tunable
Polarization transmitarray element,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13,
pp. 702-705, 2014.
Three sets of experiments, as defined in Table II, were performed to [11] M. Wang, S. Xu, F. Yang and M. Li, “Design and measurement of a 1-
verify the independent beam scanning capability for dual-linear bit reconfigurable transmitarray with subwavelength H-Shaped coupling
polarization of the proposed RTA. For experiment I and II, although slot elements,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3500-
3504, May. 2019.
the beam direction for the x-polarization case is different, the [12] W. Pan, C. Huang, X. Ma, B. Jiang and X. Luo, “A dual linearly-polarized
measured radiation patterns for the y-polarized 30°beam in the E- transmitarray element with 1-bit phase resolution in X-band,” IEEE
plane at 12.2 GHz nearly overlap for both the co- and cross- Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 167-170, 2015.
polarization, as plotted in Fig. 13. For experiment II and III, the [13] C. Huang, W. Pan, X. Ma and X. Luo, “1 bit reconfigurable circularly
measured x-polarized radiation patterns for a 30°beam in the H-plane polarized transmit-array in X Band,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
at 12.2 GHz are nearly identical for the co-polarization, while there is Lett., vol. 15, pp. 448-451, 2016.
[14] H. Yang, F. Yang, S. Xu, M. Li, X. Cao and J. Gao “A 1-bit
a slight deviation for the cross-polarization as plotted in Fig. 14. The multipolarization reflectarray element for reconfigurable large-aperture
first side lobe levels are all below −8.0 dB, while the cross- antennas,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 581-584,
polarization remains lower than −13.5 dB for 30° scanned beams 2016.
measured in the two planes. These results confirm that the proposed [15] J. Perruisseau-Carrier, “Dual-polarized and polarization-flexible
1-bit RTA successfully accomplishes the independent beam scanning reflective cells with dynamic phase control,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1494-1502, May. 2010.
capability for dual-linear polarization.
[16] T. Debogovic and J. Perruisseau-Carrier, “Low loss MEMS-
reconfigurable 1-bit reflectarray cell with dual-linear polarization,” IEEE
IV. CONCLUSION Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 5055-5060, Oct. 2014.
[17] T. Makdissy, R. Gillard, E. Fourn, E. Girard, and H. Legay, “Phase
In this paper, a novel 1-bit dual-linear polarized RTA that operates shifting cell for dual linearly polarized reflectarrays with reconfigurable
at Ku band was presented. The element exhibits low insertion loss of potentialities,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13, pp. 11-14,
only 1.0 dB by adding parasitic bypass dipoles. A 120-mm RTA 2014.
prototype with 400 PIN diodes operating at 12.2 GHz was designed [18] R. Pereira, R. Gillard, R. Sauleau, P. Potier, T. Dousset, and X. Delestre,
“Dual linearly-polarized unit-cells with nearly 2-bit resolution for
and measured. The measured gain was 18.3 dBi with an aperture
reflectarray applications in X-band,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
efficiency of 22.6%. Moreover, the proposed RTA can achieve two- 60, no. 12, pp. 6042-6048, Dec. 2012.
dimensional beam scanning up to 50°with good high-gain radiation [19] A. Aziz, F. Yang, S. Xu, and M. Li, “An efficient dual-band orthogonally
performance. The independent beam scanning capability for dual- polarized transmitarray design using three-dipole elements,” IEEE
linear polarization was also experimentally verified. The proposed 1- Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 17, pp. 319-322, 2018.
bit dual-linear polarized RTA design is also for circular polarization. [20] X. Zhong, L. Chen, Y. Shi, and X. Shi, “Design of multiple-polarization
transmitarray antenna using rectangle ring slot elements,” IEEE Antennas
It can be readily modified to achieve orthogonally polarized dual-band Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1803-1806, 2016.
functionality. [21] K. T. Pham, R. Sauleau, E. Fourn, F. Diaby, A. Clemente, and L. Dussopt,
“Dual-band transmitarrays with dual-linear polarization at Ka-band,”
REFERENCES IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 7009-7018, Dec. 2017.
[22] K. Pham, R. Sauleau, A. Clemente, and L. Dussopt, “Electronically
[1] A. Clemente, L. Dussopt, R. Sauleau, P. Potier, and P. Pouliguen, “1-Bit reconfigurable unit-cell and transmitarray in dual-linear polarization at
reconfigurable unit cell based on PIN diodes for transmit-array Ka-band,” Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag., Krakow, Poland, Apr.
applications in X-band,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 5, 2019.
pp. 2260-2269, May. 2012. [23] I. Munina, P. Turalchuk, A. Verevkin, V. Kirillov, D. Zelenchuk, and A.
[2] A. Clemente, L. Dussopt, R. Sauleau, P. Potier, and P. Pouliguen, Shitvov, “A study of C-band 1-bit reconfigurable dual-polarized
“Wideband 400-element electronically reconfigurable transmitarray in transmitarray,” Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag., Krakow, Poland,
X-band,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 5017-5027, Apr. 2019.
Oct. 2013. [24] L. Chang, Y. Li, Z. Zhang and Z. Feng, “Reconfigurable 2-bit fixed-
[3] F. Diaby, A. Clemente, R. Sauleau, K. T. Pham, and L. Dussopt, “2-Bit frequency beam steering array based on microstrip line,” IEEE Trans.
reconfigurable unit-cell and electronically steerable transmitarray at Ka- Antennas Propag., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 683-691, Feb. 2018.
band,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Early Access, Dec. 2019.
[4] B. D. Nguyen and C. Pichot “Unit-cell loaded with PIN diodes for 1-bit
linearly polarized reconfigurable transmitarrays,” IEEE Antennas
Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 18, pp. 98-102, 2019.
[5] L. Boccia, I. Russo, G. Amendola, and G. D. Massa, “Multilayer antenna-
filter antenna for beam-steering transmit-array applications,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 2287-2300, Jul. 2012.
[6] C. C. Cheng, B. Lakshminarayanan, and A. Abbaspour-Tamijani, “A
programmable lens-array antenna with monolithically integrated MEMS
0018-926X (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Macquarie University. Downloaded on July 13,2020 at 18:10:50 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.