Case Study On Amrut Plan
Case Study On Amrut Plan
Funding of AMRUT
AMRUT STRUCTURE
ODISHA
2992858
Population Growth Trend in Odisha
Fund Allocation for Odisha
Project Management Structure
The Project Management Structure for the Mission, representing the National, state and City level
Management is as per the figure below:
SLIP (State Level Improvement Plan)
Bhubaneswar (2017-2018)
Bhubaneswar
● As Per Census 2011: The population of
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation is
8.44 Lakh.
● The decadal growth rate of the city is
very high @ 30.2% indicating that
Bhubaneswar is growing very fast.
● The population of the out growth area is
about 0.45 Lakh.
● The average daily floating population is
about 25,000.
● It is the state capital of Odisha, which is
also part of the tourism golden triangle
of Puri-Konark-Bhubaneswar.
● The city is well connected by rail, air and
road.
● Bhubaneswar is the business & tourism
gateway of the state.
● The city has become one of the major IT
hub of India.
Existing Conditions in Bhubaneswar
● Adequate land is available for horizontal growth of the city and to
accommodate future infrastructure needs with low environmental risk.
● There is adequate source for water and availability of potable water supply in
Bhubaneswar to match the national benchmark.
● Existing Sewerage system is in place which is being augmented under JnNURM &
JAICA funding.
● The storm water drainage system is also being developed under JnNURM.
● Solid waste of the city is managed on PPP mode including landfill and treatment.
● Good public transport facility is available in the city with city bus service in PPP
mode; while MRTS is proposed to connect Bhubaneswar with Cuttack, Khurda
and Jatni.
● BRTS is proposed for two corridors in Bhubaneswar in the first phase.
● Bhubaneswar is the largest educational hub of the state with adequate number
of schools, colleges, technical and vocational institutes and universities.
● Bhubaneswar has the presence of reputed Institutes like AIIMS, IIT, NISER and
major hospitals like APPOLO, KALINGA, AMRI, CARE, SUM and many more.
Preparation of SLIP: Water Supply
Step 01: Assess the service level gap
● The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Water Supply .
● This will also include existing institutional framework for the sector.
● AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels.
● The zone wise data shall be used in identifying the gaps.
● These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps.
What are existing services levels for water supply in the city? What is the coverage of water supply
Connections? What is per capita supply of water? How much is the extent of metering? How much
is non-revenue water? Provide information in table.
The existing service levels for water supply to Bhubaneswar are given below in the prescribed
table
What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by MoUD?
The existing gap in service levels are as follows : Coverage- 65% , Per-capita Water supply– 250
lpcd has been planned to reduce to 135 lpcd. Extent of Metering- 98 %, Extent of NRW-32.5%,
Quality of Water- Gap in reliability, Cost Recovery- 69%, Efficiency in collection of Water related
charges—Gap in reliability
A) SOURCE OF WATER AND WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
What is the existing source of water? Is it surface water source or under ground water source? What
is the capacity of these sources?
The existing prime source of water is surface source from river “Mahanadi” , “Kuakhai” and “
Daya”. The total production capacity of the surface source is 223 MLD. Apart from surface sources,
there are 336 nos production wells which supplement 42 MLD. It has been proposed in AMRUT
scheme to abandon the ground water sources.
Is there any treatment provided to water from these sources ? How much water is required to be
treated daily? What is the treatment capacity installed in the city?
Yes, about 223 MLD of water is being treated daily in five no. treatment plants for the city. The total
Installed capacity of treatment plant is 230.
B) DISTRIBUTION ZONES
What is the total water storage capacity in the city? What is capacity of elevated and ground
water reservoirs?
Total water storage capacity of the city is =122.427 ML
ESR =13.17 ML
GSR=109.257 M
In case of surface water, does city need to have ground level reservoirs to store raw treated
water?
Elevated service reservoirs are required to store treated water.
Is water being supplied to consumers through direct pumping or through elevated reservoirs?
Both the practices are adopted at present. However provisions have been made in AMRUT
Scheme to avoid direct pumping and to ensure supply through ESR.
D) DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
What is the total length of water supply distribution pipe line laid in the city?
Total existing water supply distribution pipe line in the city is 1132.73 Km.
Is the pipe lines are laid in all streets? Is the objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe
line is achieved?
Pipe lines are not laid in all the streets. Pipe is not laid in all the streets and hence universal
coverage is not achieved.
E) INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service provision in table
Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of services will
be required to fulfill the gap?
Yes. Additional infrastructures are required to address the demand of the newly added areas.
New WTP, feeder main, storage and distribution are needed to the bridge the gap and attain the
benchmark levels.
Has city conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water ?if yes, what is the NRW level? Is city
planning to reduce NRW ?
City has conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water through indirect methods which is 62.5%.
Yes the city has plans to reduce NRW by way of introduction of HH level metering, reducing illegal
connections and reducing technical losses.
Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects, calculate
existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for water supply pipe network, number of
household to be provided with tap connections, and required enhancement in capacity of
water source/ treatment plant (MLD). Gaps in water supply service levels be provided as per
Table.
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal
coverage.
Each of the objective have been evolved from the outcome assessment. Which can be listed
as follows:
1. Ensure quality to water
2. Universal household level access with adequate water
3. Reduce NRW thereby increase the coverage & cost recovery
4. Ensure equity within the zone
What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the objectives?
The objective will be met by increasing the network, house connections, reducing
NRW. The funding for the same shall be from AMRUT. PPP mode of operation is being
Explored.
How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt during
implementation of these projects?
Availability of land, NH & railway crossing and realistic market estimate are the major
bottleneck which have been specifically addressed prior to preparation of SLIP for the
AMRUT projects. Technically feasible lands have been identified and the concerned
authorities have been moved for transfer of land.
Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?
Yes.
Step 05: Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objectives.
Brief the ongoing drainage projects in the city. The components included in these projects, how
and up to what extent it will support to the drainage system of the city. Weather it address all the
issues related to drainage?
The ongoing project is SWD master plan for the city. Approval required from the state govt. The
various components which are required in the project are Re-sectioning, lining, rehabilitation/
renovation, new construction of the primary drains in 67 wards. However there are 4 wards as per
the new wards and the secondary and tertiary connection to the primary drains.
A) Coverage of drains
● Describe how at present, the storm water of City is drained off? How many natural and
manmade drains are exists and their coverage with respect to road network?
There are 10 Nos of actual drains having 71.0 Km. There are 71.0 Km of mandate format. Also
with respect to the road network the coverage is 45.29%.
● Does city have separate storm water drainage network? If no, provide the information
regarding locations of gray water mixes with the existing drains in table 1.2. In case of mixed
drainage how it works in peak rainy days?
All are combined system all across the city, grey water mixes with the storm water
In case of mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?
During the rainy season the drains tends to overflow. Further there are several artificial flooding
created within the city which creates an Unhygienic condition in the city.
B) WATER LOGGING
Presently how the problem of water logging is handled? Is it provides the satisfactory
outcome?
No separate measures have been taken up in order to handle water logging. Except eight
location where there are problem of water logging.
Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on Key
road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or more) in
the Table 1.2
C) CHOKING OF DRAINS
Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on Key
road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or more) in
the Table 1.2.
D) INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service provision in
table 1.3. Is it in accordance with the AMRUT guidelines (Clause 8.1)?
Step 2.Bridge the Gap
● Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to
bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage.
● Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and
meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.
How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in storm water drainage system?
Will completion of above improve the coverage of network; eliminate the chocking of drains and
water stagnation problem? If yes, how much.
Approximately 60.03 km of primary (main) drain is covered in the new DPR.The completion of the
project would result in network increment and the improvement of the primary drains. The project
once completed would 100% of the primary drainage requirement
would be solved.
Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of services will be
required to fulfill the gap?
Yes.
The city would require Branch drain (left out primary, secondary & tertiary drainages) over the drain
to connect to the main drain, hence covering of the complete drainage system.
● Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factor
would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable storm water drainage scheme.
The BOD and the COD of the storm should be lower down to the necessary le3vel such that it
doesn’t affect the nearby environment. Further the possibility of the necessary ground water
recharge for the area should be considered.
Step 08: Financial Plan
● How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB do
not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
● Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement of project
life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
Preparation of SLIP: Sewerage
Step 01: Assess the service level gap
● The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Sewerage.
● Existing service levels for sewerage for coverage of sewerage network services, efficiency of
collection of sewerage and efficiency in treatment. Provide information in table
● What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by MoUD?
Though 33 % sewerage network available, but no treatment . The disposal is irregular and mostly
to open drains. Over all said table is self explanatory for assessment of gap.
SEWERAGE NETWORK AND COLLECTION OF SEWERAGE
● Question: How much of the area of the city is covered by sewerage network? What is the
status of household connections in each zone? What are the areas covered under septage?
Provide information in Table
At present there is no systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste from septic
tanks. Only 6 nos. of Cesspool emptier are available which is not sufficient for systematic and
organized cleaning. As there is no organized method of collection in many of the cases, the septic
tanks overflow either into nearby drains/open fields etc.
Implementation of project will done by Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board
STEP 02: BRIDGE THE GAP
List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address these gaps. For
this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sewerage system under different
schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to be completed? Provide
information in Table
How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by changing their
orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to focusing on optimum use of
existing assets?
STEP 6: CONDITIONALITIES
● Describe the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental
obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission
needed to implement the project.
Govt land has been identified and available. Environmental clearance applied and other
clearances / NOC are under process.
STEP 7: RESILIENCE
● Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organisations. The resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme.
The proposed project under AMRUT and ongoing/ sanctioned would be built-in to ensure
environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Also Odisha State Pollution Board requirements
shall be adhered to.
● Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years. O&M shall be integral part of the execution
contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall be responsible for post asset
creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supply shall be borne by the OWSSB (Odisha
Water Supply and Sewerage Board)
In the Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP) for Bhubaneswar, sector-wise projects
identified and the estimated costs are:
Storm
Lorem ipsumwater
dolor sit amet at nec ●● No.
Donec risusOf dolorProjects:
porta venenatis 3
03 at adipiscing
● Pharetra luctus felis
●● Cost:
Proin in tellus Rs. 803.65 Cr
felis volutpat
drainage
● No. Of Projects: 10
04 Urban transport
● Cost: Rs. 125.70 Cr
● No. Of Projects: 20
05 Parks
● Cost: Rs. 5.97 Cr.
In total 77 nos of projects have been identified with a total estimated cost of Rs. 2082.13 Cr
For Detailed List of Projects Please scan the QR code:
SAAP (State Annual Action Plan)
ODISHA (2017-2018)
Preparation of SAAP
Step 01: Principles of Prioritization
The AMRUT mission guidelines provide the states with flexibility to decide on prioritization for
interULB fund allocation, while prescribing the following broad recommendations.
1. Prioritize ULBs with higher service gaps in water supply & sewerage in first year
2. ULBs with low financial strength shall be financed to greater extent
3. ULBs with high proportion of urban poor to receive higher share
4. Potential smart cities shall be given first preference
5. Prioritization of ULBs in consultation with elected representatives of mission cities
● Accordingly, the State has identified projects based on gap analysis carried out in SLIP
documents, and financial strength of the ULBs.
● The water supply and sewerage sectors have been identified as priority sectors, with an
objective of achieving universal coverage of infrastructure networks.
While ensuring to select the projects with readily available land and its ownership with ULBs, the
following additional priorities were also considered for shortlisting the projects for SAAP 2017-18.
Has financially weaker ULBs given priority for financing?
Yes, the ULBs having poor financial positions were given priority for allocation of funds.
Has O&M cost been excluded from project cost for the purpose of funding? No.
Step 03: Reform Implementation
● What is the outcome of the self-evaluation done for reporting progress on reform
implementation in order to receive the 10% incentive?
An assessment of the possible outcome of self-evaluation for reform commitments of FY 2016-17
has been done as per AMRUT guidelines. Based on the current progress on reform commitments,
it is expected that Odisha will achieve 100% score (1170 marks for nine mission cities) by
implementing the requisite 13 reform milestones for the FY 2016-17.
● Have any issues been identified during the review by SHPSC on Reforms implementation?
What are the issues?
No issues have been identified during the review by SHPSC on reform implementation.
● Have these issues been considered while planning for reform implementation? How?
Necessary steps being taken up by the H&UD Department, Government of Odisha on revision of
building bye-laws incorporating the essential features from model building byelaws circulated
by MoUD and implementation of energy audit for water supply operations.
Step 04: Annual Capacity Building Plan
● What is the physical and financial Progress of capacity development at state level?
Odisha has been able to fulfil the commitments made as part of SAAP for FY 2015-16 &
2016-17 to implement the individual capacity building programs so far.
Progress in Capacity Building FY 2015-16 & 16-17 (Quarter ending Nov ‘16)
What has been the
progress during the
previous year/s in
institutional capacity
building, especially but
not only in the seven
areas that are
mentioned in the
AMRUT Guidelines?
Step 05: Administrative and Other Expenses (A&OE)
● What are the items for which the A&OE has been used?
a. for payment of professional fees of PDMC and PMU
b. Preparation of SAAP
c. Publications and Reform Implementations
d. Capacity Buildings
● How the residual financing (over and above Central Government share) is shared between
the States, ULBs?
The residual financing over and above Central Government share for water supply and
septage projects is to be borne by the state government. This is due to the weak financial
position of the ULBs. For park projects the residual financing is proposed to be done by the
respective ULBs, from other revenue sources
● Has any other sources identified by the State/ULB?
Yes. Alternate sources of revenue are being identified for larger and viable projects e.g. for
Bhubaneswar Water Supply projects PPP route is being explored. In such cases the
government share will be identified through the Viability Gap Funding.
● Has projects been dovetailed with other sectoral and financial programme of the Centre
and State Governments?
Yes. All possible dovetailing / convergence of ongoing approved projects under PMAY,
Smart City, Swachh Bharat, State and local schemes have been considered while
preparation of the SLIPs of the ULBs.
● Has States/UTs explored the possibility of using Public Private Partnerships (PPP), as a
preferred execution model? Please discuss.
Yes. Exploring of PPP option will be done at the DPR preparation stage. ULBs are being
encouraged to consider the market route for funding the project capex, O&M and sale of
by-products e.g. organic manure from solid waste, grey water for horticulture and agriculture
uses.
BREAKUP OF TOTAL MOUD ALLOCATION FOR AMRUT