FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN

MEKANIKAL DAN PEMBUATAN

UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA

BMMP 2503 MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION (PENGUKURAN DAN

INSTRUMENTASI)

LAB ASSESSMENT 2

ANGLE MEASUREMENT

INSTRUCTOR’S NAME Ts.Muhammed Noor Hashim

STUDENT’S NAME MATRIX NO:

S1. MUHAMMAD AQIL AIMAN BIN ABD MANAP B092010400
S2. MUHAMMAD SYAFIQ BIN MOHD SHARIFF B092010339
S3. RUSHANTHAN A/L RANGANATHAN B092010150
S4. TAN WEI XIANG B092010268

ASSESSEMENT RUBRICS
GIVEN MARKS
MARK
ASSESSMENT TASK/ITEMS
ALLOCATION
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
1. Procedure: Ability to write down the machine operating 10
procedure accurately.
2. Work Process: 20
1) Ability to write down the work process to obtain
data
2) Ability to demonstrate correct data
3. Outcome (Results): 30
1) Ability to display data in correct figure and/or table
format.
2) Ability to perform calculation for measurement
system analysis (M SA).
4. Outcome (Discussion & Conclusion): 30
1) Ability to interpret M SA data and trend correctly.
2) Ability to provide observation and comments related
to the interpretation.
5. Discipline 10
TOTAL MARKS 100

Approved By: ………………………………………………..…..

(Instructor’s Signature & Stamp)

Date: …………………………………………….........

1
 FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN MEKANIKAL
DAN PEMBUATAN UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA
MELAKA

MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION (PENGUKURAN DAN

BMMP 2503
INSTRUMENTASI)

LAB SHEET 2
ANGLE MEASUREMENT

Learning LO3 M easure the performance of a measurement system.

Outcome (LO):
Program PO5 Ability to select and apply appropriate techniques, resources and modern
Outcome: engineering tools, with an understanding of their limitations.
Synopsis: The lab activity expose students in practical on the calibration of basic angle
measurement instruments such as Bevel Vernier protractor, sine bar set-up, and optical
comparators, with angle gauge blocks are used as standard of reference for calibration.
After that, students need to get required dimensions (refer to sample schematic drawing)
of a set of 2 parts with same design. The obtained measurement values need to be
corrected if the related equipment has calibration error. After completing the activities,
students need to perform measurement system analysis using Average and Range
method.
Related Lecture’s 1. Lecture 6 Angle M easurement
Topic:
Prepared by: Prof. M adya Dr. Lau Kok Tee Date: 18/10/2020

Approved by Dr. Ridhwan bin Jumaidin Date

LM/SLM/PP/HOD

QMS: REVISION RECORDS

Revision Date Approved by

Description Prepared by:
No (DD/MM/YY) LM/SLM/HOD:
Contents reviewed after 5 years Prof. M adya Dr.
1 30/08/2018
Lau Kok Tee
Update New Lab Sheet Template Prof. M adya Ts.
2 18/10/2020 Dr. Lau Kok Tee

2
0.0 OBEJCTIVE
To analysis measurement system of angle measurement of fabricated parts using Average and Range M ethod.

1.0 THEORY

Angle measurement is an important dimensional measurement for workpiece. There are four main instruments
for angle measurement as follows :
1. Bevel Vernier protractor
2. Angle block gauge, block gauges, sine bar and dial gauge set-up
3. Horizontal Optical Comparator
4. Vertical Optical Comparator

Before measurements are conducted, the instruments need to be calibrated using a standard calibration
procedure. A set Angle Gauge Blocks will be used as standard to calibrate the angle measurement shown by
the instruments. M easurement errors corresponded to the instruments need to be identified, and then are used
to correct the obtained (raw) measurement data.
2.0 EQUIPMENTS/ EXPERIMENT APPARATUS/ CONSUMABLE MATERIALS

Bevel Vernier protractor Angle block gauge, block gauges, sine bar and dial gauge set-up

Horizontal Optical Comparator Vertical Optical Comparator

PH 3155 F PJ A 3000

3
3.0 PROCEDURES/ METHODOLOGY
Write down the procedure according to the demonstration.

Bevel vernier Protector:

i. The work piece was placed to the base part of bevel vernier protractor.
ii. The bevel vernier protractor was locked.
iii. The number of full degrees was counted.
iv. The number of full degrees was counted between the 5 degree mark onthe degrees scale and the 5
minute mark on the vernier scale.
v. The number of minutes was counted.
vi. The number of minutes was counted on the vernier scale until reach minute mark which matches.
vii. The data was recorded.

Optical horizontal comparator:

i. The main plug was switched on.
ii. The data board was switched on.
iii. The power and light was switched on.
iv. The specimen was put on working table.
v. The focus was adjusted for clear image.
vi. The X-Y was set to zero to measure the angle of specimen.
vii. The power and light was switched off.
viii. The main plug was switched off after 5 minutes

M easured angle

Figure 1 Schematic of sample for angle measurement using Bevel protractor

M easured angle (AC)

Figure 2 Schematic of sample for angle measurement using optical comparator

4
4.0 RESULTS
You are required to use raw data provided in Appendix B in order to perform the following tasks:
1. Determine the calibration error (e) of each instrument for the measurements of three different angle
block gauge sizes. Then, plot a graph of calibration error vs block gauge size, if calibration error  0.
2. Assign two students as Inspector 1 and 2. Each inspector need to measure the angle dimensions of the
assigned angle (see Figure 1) using one of the appropriate instrument. State justification of instrument
selection in the Procedure section.
3. Each Inspector need to repeat the measurement in order to get total three measurement data for the
angle dimension.
4. Determine error corresponding to the raw measurement data using the plotted calibration error. Assign
the error to the raw measurement data in order to get the corrected data.
5. Tabulate the corrected data according to inspector, Trial number and Part number (refer to course
module for reference of format)
6. Calculate Average (𝑥̅ ) and Range (R) of the corrected data.
7. Calculate the Range average (𝑅̅ ) and Average of average ( 𝑥̿ ).
8. Calculate the Average of range average ( 𝑅̿) and Difference between average of average ( 𝑥̿ 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓).
9. Apply equation of Average and Range M ethod. Refer to Table of d*2 Values for constant substitution.

Callibration Error vs Block Gauge Size of

Horizontal Optical Comparator
30
25
25
Block Gauge Size (°)

20
20
15
15

10

0
ͦͦͦ0°
ͦͦͦͦͦͦ 12 0° 13 0° 10
Callibration Error (e)

5
 Calibration Error vs Block Gauge Size of Vertical
Optical Comparator
30
25
25
20
Block Gauge Size (°)

20
15
15

10

0
0° 16 0° 5 0° 28
Calibration Error (e)

Calibration Error vs Block Gauge Size of

Bevel Vernier Protractor
30
25
25
20
Block Gauge Size (°)

20
15
15

10

0
0° 5 0° 15 0°
Calibration Error (e)

6
7
8
9
10
11
5.0 DISCUSSION
For discussion, your writing need to show your:
1) Ability to interpret M SA data and trend correctly.
2) Ability to provide observation and comments related to the interpretation.

Repeatability is the variance in measurements obtained with a single measuring instrument when used multiple
times by a single appraiser when measuring the same characteristics on the same component.

The optical comparator has a good repeatability, since the data from the experiment reported closed with real
value, whereas the bevel vernier protector has a poor repeatability.

Reproducibility is the difference in the average of the measurement made by a different inspector using the
same measuring instrument when measuring the same characteristic on the same component.

The outcome of this experiment reveals that the bevel vernier protector has low reproducibility, since the result
reported from this lab shows a significant difference in value between each inspector, whereas the optical
comparator has good reproducibility.

A factor that has had an impact on repeatability, and reproducibility, between insopector is training, technique,
expertise and experience.

6.0 CONCLUSION

M easurement System Analysis is the complete study of the measurement system to determine and
understand the source of variation that can influence the result measured or produced by the system.
M easurement System Analysis assesses the adequacy of a measurement system for a given application.
From this experiment we can conclude that optical comparator is the best result in term of (M SA) because its
have a good repeatability, good reproducibility and have percentage R&R <10% that is acceptable for
measurement system.

The perfect measurement system only the correct measurement and its having statistical property of
zero variance, zero bias, and zero chances of misclassification of product measured. Suggestion to improve
the repeatability, reproducibility and R&R is give a training to appraiser, develop skills among appraiser, give
an experience about instrument in industrial to appraiser and record a reading repeatly and find the average.

12
7.0 OTHERS
Reference:
1. https://www2.clarku.edu/faculty/djoyce/trig/angle.html#:~:text=The%20concept%20of%20angle&text=Ther
e%20are%20two%20commonly%20used,right%20angle%20is%2090%C2%B0.
2. https://quality-one.com/msa/

Attendance (uLearn Login Screen View)

Attendance (uLearn Logout Screen View)

13
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:

Your response to each task will be graded separately based on the checklist attached. To obtain maximum marks,
ensure that your response addresses each of the tasks in the question accordingly.

Assessment checklist for Lab Activity

Assessment tasks Mark LO PO C/P/A level

allocation
P3 –
Procedure: Ability to write down the machine 10 LO3 PO4
Guided
operating procedure accurately.
response

Work Process:
20 LO3 PO4 P4 – Mechanism
1)Ability to write down the work process to
obtain data
2)Ability to demonstrate correct data
Outcome (Results):
30 LO3 PO5 P4 – Mechanism
1)Ability to display data in correct figure
and/or table format.
2)Ability to perform calculation for
measurement system analysis (M SA).

Outcome (Discussion & Conclusion):

30 LO3 PO5 P4 –
1)Ability to interpret M SA data and trend Mechanism
correctly.
2)Ability to provide observation and
comments related to the interpretation.
Discipline
10 LO3 PO4 P2 – Set
TOTAL 100

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTION

1. Answer in ENGLISH.
2. M ust include list of references dan screen view of student’s login/logout clock time.
3. Submit the lab assessment ONCE only in a SINGLE file.
4. Submit your lab assessment ONLINE: #2-Angle (ULearn).
5. Need to submit by the end of the lab session.
6. Student will be given until 72 hrs after the lab session to send the late submission. ZERO mark will be given after
the late submission dateline.
7. This lab assessment accounts for 8% of the total marks for the course.

14
 Very Weak Weak Modest Good Excellent
Item Description
0 1 2 3 4
Unable to identify and No mistakes while using
Ability to choose and Able to identify but unable to M inor mistakes while using Students are comfortable
Procedure mishandling the equipment, but not
use equipment use equipment equipment with the equipment
equipment comfortable
Ability to construct and Work process are
Work process is missing M ajor work process are Some work process are Most of the work process
understanding of or unclear missing missing are followed correctly followed correctly and in
Work Process experiment order

Ability to show data All data are missing or M ost data are missing or M ost data are correctly All data are taken but minor All data are correctly
incorrect incorrect taken, no missing data data are incorrect taken

Data, figures, graphs, tables, All data, figures, graphs, All data, figures, graphs,
M ost data, figures, graphs,
diagrams, contain errors or are tables, diagram, are tables, diagrams are
Show results tables, diagram are
No record of results at all poorly constructed, have correctly drawn, and correctly drawn, are
(Simulation and/or recorded, some labeled still
in any form. missing titles, captions, labeled labeled but some have numbered, are labeled
Hardware) missing some important or
or numbers, units missing or required features minor problems or could still and contain
incorrect, etc. be improved titles/captions.

Outcome

Some of the results have All important trends and

No interpretation of trends Incomplete or incorrect Almost all of the results data comparisons have
been correctly interpreted
and comparison of data, interpretation of trends and have been correctly been interpreted
and discussed;
Explain purpose of observation and comparison of data, interpreted and discussed. correctly and discussed.
understanding of results is
experiment conclusion indicating a observation and conclusion Observation and comments Understanding of results
lack of understanding of indicating a lack of still evident, observation are good. Requires only is conveyed through
and comments are
results. understanding of results. minor improvements. observation and
acceptable.
comments.

Ability to perform lab M ajor flaws to criteria, 10 M inor flaws to criteria, 5 M inor flaws to dress code Conform to dress code,
Discipline Conform to all criteria
and safety regulations minutes late minutes late and safety minor flaw to safety

15