BAM Analysis
BAM Analysis
DECLARATION: -
We declare that this continuous evaluation component is our original work.
We have not copied from any source, or any other students work. We
have acknowledged the source, if any content is used in completion of this
continuous evaluation component. We are responsible for any
discrepancies/unfair means content/copied material presented in the
assignment/case analysis.
CLUSTER ANALYSIS
PRODUCT – Apparels
In this case, we used –
1. Hierarchical method
2. Non-hierarchical method – K means clustering
We took a total of 60 respondents for analysis and the following steps were
followed for the analysis –
HEIRARCHIAL ANALYSIS
We first obtain responses from the people via survey on apparels and then
import the data to the SPSS Software.
2. Case
3. Dendrogram – This shows the hierarchical relationship between the
objects. It is most commonly created as an output from hierarchical
clustering method. The main use of a dendrogram is to work out the
best way to allocate objects to clusters.
K MEANS CLUSTER ANALYSIS
We get the following results after K means cluster analysis –
6. The next analysis would be of the ANOVA table which tells us which
variables in our study contribute the most to our clustering solution.
The greater the F value, the greater the separation between clusters.
Therefore, from the final results of clustering we can conclude that Area as
a factor is not contributing in the clustering of the respondents. Other
factors which are not significantly contributing in clustering of respondents
are –
The factors present in the ANOVA table are the only ones who significantly
contribute to the clustering.
As we can see that the respondents of the apparel survey are finally
divided into 2 clusters where cluster no. 2 being with the highest
respondents. The clustering was done on the basis of respondent’s
similarities and dissimilarities.
The Apparel brands should focus more on what type of respondents belong
to each cluster while focusing more on the 1st cluster as it has the
maximum respondents with similarities. This way they will cater to a
larger customer segment and can come up with new types of marketing
strategies to target these particular group of customers.
MDS helps is assessing the positions of a product on the perceptual map with
other competitors.
To know how many pairs will be formed, we use the formula n(n-1)/2,
where n is the number of objects.
For matrix
Stress = .01211 RSQ = .99867
Stimulus Coordinates
Dimension
Stimulus Stimulus 1 2
Number Name
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 .000
2 3.053 .000
3 2.026 1.170 .000
4 3.234 2.569 2.026 .000
5 1.737 3.234 2.026 2.026 .000
6 1.468 2.571 1.468 1.737 .660 .00
Conclusion:
By the above results and and plots we can say that Comfort, Brand, and
Quality are towards the origin compared to colour, trends and price factor.
Hence customers give more preference to comfort, brand, and Quality of
apparels.
The R square value is 0.998 which is greater than 80% hence the model is fit.
The Stress value is 0.1207 which is less than 0.2 and hence within limits.
CONJOINT ANALYSIS