ELEN E6316: Analog-Digital Interfaces: Course Introduction Dynamic Range (Noise and Linearity)
ELEN E6316: Analog-Digital Interfaces: Course Introduction Dynamic Range (Noise and Linearity)
ELEN E6316:
Analog-Digital Interfaces
Course Introduction
Dynamic Range (Noise and Linearity)
Columbia University
Spring 2020
T. Dickson © 2020
Course Information
Instructor: Tod Dickson
Email: [email protected]
Office hours: Tues 5:30-6:30PM (1332A/1334A Mudd)
TA: Aditya Gaonkar
Email: [email protected]
Office hours: TBD
Class Tues. 7:00-9:30 PM (Mudd 834)
Course material available online:
http://courseworks.columbia.edu
Prerequisite: ELEN E4312 (Analog Electronic
Circuits)
T. Dickson © 2020
References
No required textbook. My lecture notes draw material
from a number of sources:
:
R. Schreier & G. Temes, Understanding Delta-Sigma
Data Converters, McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Chan Carusone, Johns & Martin, Analog Integrated
Circuit Design (2nd edition), Wiley, 2012.
I
R. van de Plassche, Integrated Analog-to-Digital
and Digital-to-Analog Converters (2nd edition),
Springer, 2003.
T. Dickson © 2020
Assignments & Grading
Grading:
Midterm: 20% (March 12th)
Problem Sets: 20%
Project: 30%
Final: 30% (TBD, tentatively May 14th)
Computer Requirements:
The Cadence design environment will be
used. Transistor model files will be
provided by the instructor.
MATLAB may also be required for some
assignments.
T. Dickson © 2020
Dynamic Range
Dynamic range is the range of signal
levels that can be (linearly) processed
by a system.
Minimum signal level is set by the
noise floor of the system.
Maximum signal level is set by the
nonlinearities within the system.
T. Dickson © 2020
Quantifying Power
Remember that a dB is a relative quantity.
Example: Signal 1 is X dB larger than signal 2 means
P
X = 10 log 1 (X has units of dB)
2
P
How do we express the absolute power of a signal, when we
don’t have another signal to compare it to?
P
Y = 10 log 1 (Y has units of dBm)
1mW
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise
Two types of noise – interference and inherent noise
Inference – corruption of one signal by another
Examples – power supply noise, capacitive coupling
between wires (clock signals are very bad for this).
May or may not be random.
In ICs, board, and package design, can only improve
through careful layout/wiring/routing/planning.
These notes do not deal with interference noise.
Inherent Noise
Noise from devices (transistors, resistors, etc).
Can be reduced (but never eliminated) through
circuit design techniques, but not strongly dependent
on layout or wiring.
We will only discuss inherent noise.
T. Dickson © 2020
( wt )
* For ult ) -_ aisin * For ult)= Aotaisinlwt )
terms =
Aq URms=ao2-A÷M
Noise in Time Domain
•Noise signals are random,
hence we analyze them
statistically.
'
•We cannot determine the
noise voltage at a given instant
-
in time.
t
1/ 2
•Root mean square (rms) value found by averaging the 1 T 2
Vn ,rms = vn (t )dt
noise over a period of time T. Longer T gives more T 0
accurate estimate of rms value.
&
1/ 2
1 T 2
•Similarly, we can find the rms value of a noise current. I n,rms = in (t )dt
Vn2,rms T 0
Pdiss = = Vn2,rms
=
•Power dissipated in a 1-Ω resistor is 1Ω
T. Dickson © 2020
-
Adding noise sources
If we know the rms values of the two
noise sources, can we determine the
total rms noise?
vno (t ) = vn1 (t ) + vn 2 (t )
T T
1 2 1
= vno (t )dt = [vn1 (t ) + vn 2 (t )] dt = Vn21,rms + Vn22,rms + 2CVn1,rmsVn 2,rms
2
Vno2 ,rms
T 0 T 0
T
1
C is the correlation coefficient, and is
always between -1 and +1.
T 0
vn1 (t )vn 2 (t )dt
C≡
(C is the covariance divided by the product Vn1,rmsVn 2,rms
of the standard deviations)
T. Dickson © 2020
Correlation
Vno2 ,rms = Vn21,rms + Vn22,rms + 2CVn1,rmsVn 2,rms
Case 1) C = 0
Noise sources are uncorrelated (independent)
Case 2) C = +1
Noise sources are fully correlated and in-phase
Case 3) C = -1
Noise sources are fully correlated and 180o out-of-phase
Vno2 ,rms = Vn21,rms + Vn22,rms − 2Vn1,rmsVn 2,rms = [Vn1,rms − Vn 2,rms ]
2
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise in Frequency Domain
Time domain Frequency Domain
v(t) V2(f)
time f0=1/T0 f
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise in Frequency Domain
PSD RPS D
The noise power at an exact frequency is zero (otherwise the noise would have
some periodicity). Instead, PSD looks at the mean squared noise in a normalized
1-Hz bandwidth (look at the units of the PSD).
Can determine the rms noise voltage (or current) by integrating the PSD.
∞
Vn2,rms = Vn2 ( f )df (Note: Only integrated over
0
one side of the spectrum)
T. Dickson © 2020
Measuring Noise
{
In plot above – Vn2(f) is about 1000 (µV)2/Hz at 0.1Hz. Hence for a 1-mHz
∞ ∞
V
2
no ( f )df = [Vn21 ( f ) + Vn22 ( f )]df
0 0
T. Dickson © 2020
White Noise Example ( Noise Power)
T. Dickson © 2020
1/f (or ‘Flicker’) noise
Some practical noise sources have a power spectral
density that increases at lower frequencies (i.e., when
you give more time for a random event to occur).
Usually, we exclude very low frequencies from our total
integrated noise calculation (for example, 10-8 Hz takes
3+ years to observe)
Vril f)
=µ¥
"
V
→
If *
be volts
T. Dickson © 2020
Flicker Noise Calculation
Find the 1/f noise corner for a noise
source with PSD:
Answer:
Equate the white noise and the 1/f noise
(3.2 × 10 ) = (1 × 10 )
−6 2
−6 2 f =
(3.2 × 10 )
−6 2
= 10.24 Hz
f (1 × 10 )
−6 2
T. Dickson © 2020
Filtered Noise
T. Dickson © 2020
1st-order lowpass filtered noise
T. Dickson © 2020
Equivalent Noise Bandwidth
-
signal power Vx2,rms Vx ,rms
SNR ≡ 10 log = 10 log 2 = 20 log (in dB)
noise power Vn ,rms Vn ,rms
SNRin =
vn2,rms (F is a measure of the noise added by the amplifier)
Gvin2 ,rms v 2
in , rms v 2
+v
n , rms
2
v
na , rms
2
na , rms
SNRout = = F= = 1+
Gvn2,rms + Gvna
2
, rms v 2
n , rms+v 2
na , rms v 2
n , rms v 2
n , rms
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise in Cascaded Circuits
•Suppose we have two cascaded gain stages with gains AV1 and AV2,
and the input referred noise of each stage is Vn1 and Vn2 respectively.
* AV1 * AV2
Vn12(f) Vn22(f)
•We wish to know the total noise referred back to the input of
the first stage.
( f ) = Vn21 ( f ) + n 2 (2 f )
2
AV1 AV2 V
* 2
Vneq
AV 1
Vneq2(f)
•The noise of the second stage is divided by the gain of the first stage!
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise from Circuit Components
T. Dickson © 2020
Resistor Noise
Thermal noise due to random Brownian motion of
carriers.
Can express noise spectrum as a voltage source in
series with the resistor, or a current source in
parallel with the resistor.
or
T. Dickson © 2020
Resistor Noise
IMPORTANT NOTE!! Only physical resistors generate
thermal noise.
Resistors from “small-signal equivalent circuits”, i.e. rπ, ro
in transistor small-signal models are not physical
resistors and hence do not generate noise (there are
other noise sources to worry about in transistors).
Remember that these resistors arise from taking the
derivative of a particular I-V characteristic.
Base resistance (i.e., rb or sometimes called rx) for a
bipolar transistor, and gate resistance of a MOSFET (i.e.,
rg) are both physical resistors and do generate thermal
noise.
Bottom line – you have to know which resistors in a
small-signal equivalent circuit are physical and which are
not.
T. Dickson © 2020
High-Frequency Bipolar Hybrid-π
Model
Base resistance –
physical resistor that
generates noise!
rπ – not a ro – not a
physical resistor and physical resistor
does not generate noise ∂VCE
∂VBE ro =
rπ = ∂I C
∂I B
(There are other noise generators besides resistor thermal noise in a bipolar
transistor, which we shall cover shortly)
T. Dickson © 2020
Capacitor Noise
Ideal capacitors and inductors are noiseless.
However, they do store noise generated by other
elements (such as resistors).
∞ ∞
2
4kTR
DE
Vno2 ( f ) = H ( jω ) VR2 ( f ) =
4kTR
1
1 + (2πfRC )
2
4kTR
∞
kT
Vno2 ,rms = Vno2 ( f )df = df = tan −1
(2πfRC ) =
0 0 1 + (2πfRC )2
2πRC 0 C
Very important (and not an intuitive) result.
As R increases, the increase in noise is balanced by
the decrease in bandwidth.
For noise-sensitive circuits, don’t overdesign the
bandwidth.
T. Dickson © 2020
Etf .IE?gIvoE::n:4scdemam
E÷¥÷::÷÷÷÷ :*
Replace W by 21T f
:*
f Hlf)
&
integrate over →
"
itzitfrc
Capacitor Noise derivation
Csl ( Capacitor
- -
✓
-
no
→
!E%¥±I¥
noise ,
17¥ -
↳ Noise of a resistor
can be model as a lossless
resistor in series with a
Noise
Voltage source .
Von tf)
To find
division
we can use
voltage function
finding by the transfer .
Hls )=s # =
p
Hcjw ) -21
Rt 1- Rsc t s ( Rjwt ,
Sc
Itkiwsl !
1-
ftlciwy ,¥,
-
12-CRWCQVnofst-VBCSIIHCJWYZ-HKTRH.ES#
-
Diode Noise
Forward biased diode with DC bias current ID
While DC current ID gives the average rate at which
carriers pass through the p-n junction, in reality
since carriers are discrete quantities this rate may
deviate from the mean value at a given instant in
time. This is called shot noise.
T. Dickson © 2020
Bipolar Transistor Noise
Four noise sources:
Collector shot noise (due to DC current through a p-n junction)
Base shot noise (again due to DC current through a p-n junction)
Base flicker (1/f) noise (due to generation-recombination in the base)
Thermal noise from the physical base resistance
T. Dickson © 2020
Bipolar Transistor Noise Biff
Collector shot noise
Base resistance thermal noise (4kTrb) can be referred back
to the input…
as a noise voltage
(2qIC/gm2)
OR as a noise current
(2qIC/|β(f)|2)
BUT DO NOT
COUNT THE
Base shot noise current (2qIB) COLLECTOR SHOT
NOISE TWICE!!
Base flicker noise current (2qKIB/f),
where K is a technology constant
T. Dickson © 2020
MOSFET Noise
Lecture 2 01/28/20
Two noise sources:
Flicker (1/f) noise (due to random trapping of carriers in silicon-
silicon dioxide interface)
Channel thermal noise (from channel resistance)
?
me
→ ( flicker noise )
T. Dickson © 2020
Subthreshohdthegion
I. I,
"hTh¥I Fe
⇐ e n = , +
" H #I
C, e-
I Do I.
fussy → IT IS) 2g I +
-
=
=
2 ID
q
MOSFET Noise: Low-to-Moderate
Frequency Model
In saturation region…
Can represent as a single noise
voltage source
Thermal d ↳ flicker
noise noise
T. Dickson © 2020
Op-Amp Noise
Represented by three noise sources.
Input noise voltage
Two noise currents, one for each op-amp input. The noise
currents are usually neglected for MOSFET op-amps.
Typically these three noise sources are uncorrelated.
T. Dickson © 2020
Noise Analysis – Common Source
The three noise sources are uncorrelated,
so we can analyze by superposition.
-
Vno2 ( f ) Vno2 ( f )
V 2
ni (f )= 2
=
(g m RD )2
1 + ([
ω R C
s in )2
]
A( f )
1 2 1 2
V ( f ) = 4kT Rs + 2
2
ni + 1 + (ωRs Cin ) [ ]
g m RD 3 g m
Note: input referred noise INCREASES with
frequency due to reduced amplifier gain at high
frequencies.
T. Dickson © 2020
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
T. Dickson © 2020
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
Analyze by superposition –
find the output noise due to
each noise source.
of Qi r2
gain
Opamp
Vno2 1 ( f ) = ( g m1 R o ) Vn21 ( f )
2
-
2
g
(Output noise due to Q5 found in Vno2 5 ( f ) = m5 Vn25 ( f )
manner similar to common-mode 2 g m3
gain analysis of the stage.)
T. Dickson © 2020
's Cfl
Vno found
By approx
was
.
T.tdgiiz.IE.vn#-vns-*gng.gLm-
¥5 Ins
V
#A -
-
9ms Uns
I
WILL Inz
19M¥ )
%
"
A
vii. sis ) = Un's Cs) *
Qs is a diode
connected transistor
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
Total output noise is found through summation -
2 gm3
Refer back to the input by dividing by the gain.
Vno2 ( f )
V (f )=
2
ni
(g m1R o )2
2 2
g g m5 2
Vni2 ( f ) = 2Vn21 ( f ) + 2 m 3 Vn23 ( f ) + Vn 5 ( f )
m1
g m1 m 3 o
2 g g R
T. Dickson © 2020
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
2 2
g g m5 2
Vni2 ( f ) = 2Vn21 ( f ) + 2 m3 Vn23 ( f ) + Vn 5 ( f )
small & be
g m1 2 g m1 g m 3 Ro can
Notes: I neglected .
1. The last term (noise from Q5) is small compared with the first
two terms and will be neglected.
2. Noise from 2nd stage of a 2-stage op-amp will be divided by the
gain of the 1st stage when referring to the input, hence it will
also be small and will be neglected.
I
2
g m3 2
V ( f ) ≈ 2V ( f ) + 2
2
ni
2
n1
Vn3 ( f )
g m1
T. Dickson © 2020
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
Thermal Noise
2
g
V ( f ) ≈ 2V ( f ) + 2 m3 Vn23 ( f )
2
ni
2
n1
g m1
2 1 2 1
Vn21 ( f ) = 4kT Vn23 ( f ) = 4kT
3 g m1 3 g m 3
2 1 g m 3 2 1 16 1 16 g m 3
2 2
1
Vni2 ( f ) ≈ 2 4kT + 2 g 4 kT = 3 kT g + 3 kT g
3 m1 m1
g 3 m 3
g m1 m1 m3
g
T. Dickson © 2020
2-Stage Op-Amp Noise
Thermal Noise
• Sometimes the input-referred noise is
equated to an equivalent noise
resistance, by finding the resistance
value that would result in the same
input referred noise.
Thermal noise and resistance
interchangeably
noise are
value
Resistor of this will give
eg
.
noise
produced by opamp .
To
16 1 g m 3 4 1 g m 3
V ( f ) = kT
2
1 + = 4kTRn Rn = 1 +
3 g m1 g m1
ni
3 g m1 g m1
T. Dickson © 2020
Linearity and Distortion
T. Dickson © 2020
Common-Source w/ Active Load
Large-signal characteristic:
In amplifier design, we make
a ‘linear’ approximation valid
for small input amplitudes
superimposed around a
certain dc input level. High gain
region
T. Dickson © 2020
Nonlinearities/Distortion
vO
“DC operating point”
vI vO vo
VO We super impose AC
vi signal on top DC
(assuming no operating point .
memory effects) vI
VI
operating
it
changes based
⑦
vo ≈ a1vi on the op .
point .
For larger input signals, the linear approximation is less accurate and
=
we must consider the impact of higher order terms.
T. Dickson © 2020
Harmonic Distortion
Ai Az, have
Consider the nonlinear system described by Az , . . .
different units .
ViA2 ViA3
vi (t ) = ViA cos (ω0t ) =
2 2 2
[cos(2ω0t ) + 1] v (t ) = V cos (ω0t ) =
3
i
3
iA
3
[cos(3ω0t ) + 3 cos(ω0t )]
2 D-
4
ViA4
v (t ) = V cos (ω0t ) =
4
i
4
iA
4
[cos(4ω0t ) + 4 cos(2ω0t ) + 3] Dc term ( shift average
8 -
value @ output
Collecting terms with the same frequencies, we can now express
the output in terms of harmonics of the input frequency.
vo (t ) = b0 + b1 cos(ω0t ) + b2 cos(2ω0t ) + b3 cos(3ω0t ) + b4 cos(4ω0t ) + ...
T. Dickson © 2020
Harmonic Distortion
vo (t ) = b0 + b1 cos(ω0t ) + b2 cos(2ω0t ) + b3 cos(3ω0t ) + b4 cos(4ω0t ) + ...
The bi coefficients are functions of the nonlinear
coefficents (ai) and the input amplitude ViA
DC term b0 =
1 3
a2ViA2 + a4ViA4 + ... (shifts operating point)
2 8
3 (expands or compresses
ω0t term b1 = a1ViA + a3ViA3 + ...
4 the “linear” gain)
Harmonic terms
1 1 1 1
b2 = a2ViA2 + a4ViA4 + ... b3 = a3ViA3 + ... b4 = a4ViA4 + ...
2 2 4 8
For small ViA
a2 2 a3 3 a4 4
b1 ≈ a1ViA b2 ≈ ViA b3 ≈ ViA b4 ≈ ViA
2 4 8
T. Dickson © 2020
Harmonic Distortion
Total Harmonic distortion
Harmonic distortion coefficients
→ unit less of a
system .
b2 1 a2 b3 1 a3 2
HD2 ≡ ≈ ViA HD3 ≡ ≈ ViA
b1 2 a1 b1 4 a1
fundamental
output of the
What does the output spectrum look like? THD depends on VIA
Input Output
ω ω
ω0 ω0 2ω0 3ω0
T. Dickson © 2020
Distortion in Differential Systems
Each box
Again consider our nonlinear system… is
described by same
If
.v (t) i
+ ,
+
- vdiff (t ) = v p (t ) − vn (t ) = 2a1vi (t ) + 2a3vi3 (t ) + 2a5vi5 (t ) + ...
-vi(t)
Fully diff
¢
,£[¥ft-
-
otherof diff
.
vn (t ) = −a1vi (t ) + a2 vi2 (t ) − a3vi3 (t ) + a4 vi4 (t ) + ...
half In a fully differential system, rinn
amp
.
vine
even-order distortion terms cancel.
Note: Remember, it was the even-order terms that were
responsible for the shift in the DC operating point… &
T. Dickson © 2020
Example: MOS Differential Amplifier
Large-signal characteristic:
‘Average’ or ‘dc’ level is set by the current source and the drain
resistor. This operating point is independent of the input level
(to a certain degree, assuming the FETs operate in saturation)
T. Dickson © 2020
Gain Compression
Plotting the output power at the fundamental frequency
as a function of the applied input power
Output Power
Transfer
The amount of gain compression
character .
that can be tolerated depends on
1dB the application.
OP1dB
Non -
Linearity
Gain The “1dB compression point”
compression
is widely used, and represents a
10% reduction in the gain.
a IP1dB
Input Power
Linear gain .
T. Dickson © 2020
dB is OP -
IP
in
gain not oP/£p
Estimating 1dB Compression
For a nonlinear system dominated by 3rd order harmonics
-
vo (t ) ≈ a1vi (t ) + a3vi3 (t )
Consider a single-tone input signal vi (t ) = ViA cos(ω0t )
From previous discussion, we know that the output
including impact of nonlinearities will be
3 (focusing only on the
vo (t ) = b1 cos(ω0t ) + ... = a1ViA + a3ViA3 cos(ω0t ) + ...
4 fundamental tone)
-
as coefficient
4
ViA,1dB = 0.145 1
a
↳ FIFTY
"
"feFewgE%gLaViH
Produces compression .
✓ a3
+ as expansion
↳
T. Dickson © 2020
,
•
Linearity of Band-limited Systems
Lowpass ed
Filter :#
after
*
HD2 H
D3
ω ω 2ω 3ω
Note that when measured with input tones near the circuit’s passband
edge, distortion terms are filtered out
With a general (broadband) input pattern, such high-frequency
distortions may mix with lower-frequency tones in-band
Single-tone measurements may not accurately capture the linearity
performance of a circuit at all frequencies
Multi-tone inputs will show non-linearities…
T. Dickson © 2020
Two-tone testing
W, & we are pretty close
to each other .
Like it .
diff .
Lowpass
Filter
HD3
ω1 ω2
tones
Two-tone testing is especially important for bandpass systems where
single-tone harmonics always lie out-of-band
Let’s look at the theory behind this distortion…
T. Dickson © 2020
Intermodulation Distortion
For the same nonlinear system described by
vo (t ) = a1vi (t ) + a2 vi2 (t ) + a3vi3 (t ) + ...
Consider a 2-tone input signal vi (t ) = V1 A cos(ω1t ) + V2 A cos(ω2t )
The output is
T
a3 [V1 A cos(ω1t ) + V2 A cos(ω 2t )]
3
IM 2 ≈ 2 1 A 2 A = 2 V2 A = 2HD2 -
a1V1 A a1
Similarly, you can show that expanding the 3rd order terms IDs amplitude of
will yield terms with frequencies at ω1, 3ω1, ω2, 3ω2, (2ω2-ω1), 3rd order inter mod
0
I 3 a
3rd order intermodulation ratio is IM 3 ≡ D 3 ≈ 3
ViA2
I D1 4 a1
T. Dickson © 2020 3rd -
order
Inter modulation
Third-Order Intercept Point
IP3 is the point
where the power I D1 ≈ a1ViA
level of the
fundamental
equals the power
3
I D 3 ≈ a3ViA3
4
3g
level of the third- Assuming
linear growth
order intermod
products.
It cannot be
directly measured,
as the amplifier
reaches
compression before
that point – thus
you have to
extrapolate.
T. Dickson © 2020
Estimating IP3 3rd order non - lineaiities in
systems
are
normally the dominant non linearity
-
I D1 ≈ a1ViA
3
IM3 I D 3 ≈ a3ViA3
4
⑦
I D 3 3 a3 2
IM 3 ≡ ≈ ViA
I D1 4 a1
IF not ,
data is been taken close to the compression point
.
Non
linocuts
-
come from
I D2
&
ID ,
Remember :
Sm
=2I÷= IT
↳ Taylor Series
↳ expansion
I
More
linearity
@
expenses
of
loosing gain .
Dynamic Range
Signal swing
Max signal amplitude limited
by the tolerable nonlinearity
SNR improves
Less distortion
Dynamic
Range
Min signal amplitude limited by
the tolerable SNR
T. Dickson © 2020
Quantifying Dynamic Range
The ratio is
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) → to
Vat
Ratio of the output signal power to the
output noise power (usually for a
sinusoidal input).
Signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio
(SNDR or SINAD)
Ratio of the output signal power to the
output noise and distortion power (again,
usually measured for a sinuoidal input).
T. Dickson © 2020
Signal to noise and distortion ratio (SNDR)
Defined as the ratio of the signal power to the total
power in all noise and distortion components
The maximum
achievable SNDR is a
popular metric for
Fig. 9.26 quantifying the
dynamic range of an
analog circuit
•
Vf
'
is the •
Viz this
,
. .
.
.
=
SFDR = I D* 1 − N O = I D* 1 − I D* 3
This assumes that 3rd order terms f
of
dominated, i.e. in fully-
differential circuits. You may slope of
T. Dickson © 2020
Rate Hz
Sampling zoom
•
!
ins
-
Df
.
in
SFDR and OIP3
Bs
Yomafree (all quantities in dB or dBm)
age II
*
.
wi fig
SFDR = I * D1 − N O = I D* 1 − I D* 3
other
I 1-
③
IM 3 = I D 3 − I D1 / DB
OIP3 = I D1 −
IM 3 (I − I )
= I D1 − D 3 D1
2 2
3 1 Holds before
OIP3 = I D1 − I D 3 of
pointthe
2 2 compression .
At I D1 ,
*
I D* 3 = N o and
I D* 1 = SFDR + N o
therefore
2
3 1 3 1
OIP3 = I D* 1 − I D* 3 = (SFDR + N o ) − N o or SFDR = (OIP3 − N o )
2 2 2 2 3
T. Dickson © 2020
Spurious-Free Dynamic Range
An alternative definition of
SFDR is the ratio of the signal
power to the power of the
largest spurious spectral Largest
distortion
component (usually within a ←
that we
defined bandwidth). see .
T. Dickson © 2020
© 2020 T. Dickson
For student use in ELEN E6316
Unauthorized distribution is prohibited
T. Dickson © 2020
•
Do BJT noise problem