CASE STUDY

A case study is a descriptive study of a single individual or small group in which the study of
an association between an observed effect and a specific environmental exposure is carried
out. This group assignment involves identification of a known environmental epidemiology
cases that had occurred in Malaysia and a detailed account of the case and its outcome.
Identify a single case of environmental epidemiology that had occurred in Malaysia and
present/discuss the aetiology/prevalence/incidence of the case. The case study must have the
following information;

1. Case study area

2. Case timeline
3. Disease/disorder aetiology
4. Causal association discussion
5. Legal issues
6. Agencies involved
7. Conclusion and future outlook

Schlumberger-Private
1. CASE STUDY AREA

1.1 Bauxite Mining in Malaysia.

The Malaysian mining industry is expected to remain as it is driven by

continued demand for mineral supplies at the national and global levels. Bauxite

mining is not a new economic activity for Malaysia. According to the Department of

Minerals and Geosciences Malaysia (2010), bauxite mining has occurred in the state

of Johor since the beginning of 2000. Meanwhile, bauxite production in Malaysia

amounted to approximately 594.7 thousand metric tons in 2020. In comparison,

Malaysia produced about 124.3 thousand tons bauxite in 2010 (World Bureau of

Metals Statistics, 2021).

In Malaysia, bauxite resources are mainly located in Bukit Batu, Bukit

Gebong, Lundu-Sematan, and Tanjung Seberang in Sarawak, Bukit Mengkabau and

Labuk Valley in Sabah, Sungai Rengit and Teluk Ramunia in Johor, and Bukit Goh in

Kuantan, Pahang. Bauxite mining in Kuantan started in early 2013 with small-scale

mining in Balok and later expanded to Bukit Goh, Bukit Sagu and Sungai Karang.

The rapid growth of bauxite mining activity, from 343,000 tonnes to 3.72

million tonnes from January to September 2015, coupled with legal and uncontrolled

mining activities has resulted in environmental disasters. As a result, the government

has imposed a three-month moratorium on all activities there on 15 January 2016

(Abdullah et al. 2016). However, the moratorium has been extended several times

with the current period ending on 31 December 2017 (until June 2017).

Bauxite mining activities in Kuantan have been linked to significant

environmental quality deterioration and have raised environmental concerns among

Schlumberger-Private
 the public. In contrast to the mining operation in Teluk Ramunia Johor which has

been operating for over 15 years without much controversy, bauxite mining in

Kuantan has created a different scenario in a short period of time. Extensive and

aggressive mining including transporting and dumping incoming bauxite in large

quantities caused environmental problems in a short period of time and caused public

outrage (Kusin et al. 2017).

Figure 1: Mining areas in the state of Pahang: (b)sampling locations in Bukit Goh, and (c)

Kuantan Port (kusin et al. 2017).

2. CASE TIMELINE

Beginning from 2013, the government began to start small-scale bauxite mining in

the area of Balok before being expanded into Goh Hill, Sagu Hill and Karang River (Snah

et al. 2017). With neighbouring Indonesia moved out from their long-time bauxite mining

industry to be replaced by domestic metal processing industry with an immediate ban

Schlumberger-Private
being enforced on the mineral mining in early 2014, this subsequently causing the

shortage of worldwide supply particularly to China.

The Malaysian state of Pahang which has deposits on the minerals taking the

opportunity to fill in the demands with the involvement of many unscrupulous parties

with unregulated mining methods. Following Malaysia's participation in the markets,

their annual output of bauxite subsequently increased from over 200,000 tonnes in 2013

to nearly 20 million tonnes in 2015, becoming the world's top producer which accounting

for nearly half of the supply to China's massive aluminium industry (ASM, 2019).

In July 2015, the Pahang state government revoked the licences of 34 contractors

to curb rampant bauxite mining in the area due to increasing concerns over pollution

caused by the activity with only 11 operators would be allowed to operate. With the

growing impacts to environment, the Cabinet of Malaysia decided to suspend the

activities until regulations, licensing and environmental protection can be put in place

(Kusin et al. 2017).

In 2017, the Malaysian government through their Environment Ministry are in the

position to extend its moratorium on the mining for another three months or more as there

is still runoff from bauxite stockpiles near a port that contaminating the country coastal

waters. An estimate of RM10 million tonnes of bauxite stockpile had been seized earlier

by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) at Goh Hill and Kuantan Port with a

probe will be facilitated for the unlawful bauxite-mining since the activities were also

involving a senior state Customs enforcement officer, 10 state Land and Mines Office

(PTG) enforcement officers and a PTG general assistant who has been arrested (Lee et al.

2017)

Schlumberger-Private
 Further in 2019, the Land and Natural Resources Ministry stated that the mining

activities can only resume if every parties involved are prepared to carry out and enforce

the standard operating procedure (SOP) for mining and exporting bauxite in Pahang.

3. Causal Association Discussion

Lack of Governance
To understand where the non-compliance occurs, it is best to understand the chain of bauxite
handling activities, which are as follows:
Pre-Mining
 illegal mining failed to eradicate
 there were no proper criteria on who can apply for a bauxite mining license, no
requirements for those granted a license to furnish technical reports, and the absence
of an open tender
Mining operation
 Missing or abuse of transit documents
 Minimized mineral transactions caused the occurrence of purchase/sale of ore from
non-sources tenement by using Mineral Ore License (MOL)
 Irregular stockpile management effective cause of dust contamination and water in the
surrounding area the absence of a Mining Scheme or non-compliance to the schemes
to cause waste management including the discharge of irregular effluents on the site
dredging
Post Mining
 Illegal and undirected transport causing spills of lorries and resulting dust pollution
and dirt on the road
 Special AP Expenditure for the purpose of disposing of stockpile ineffective and open
space to dumping ore obtained illegally for export

Source of Governance Failure

What can be translated through the above issues, noncompliance and integrity are the main
sources of governance failure.

Schlumberger-Private
Not updating the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Standard Operating procedure (SOP) important element in ensuring the activity or work
process meet the objectives set by the organization. Elements such as update act/law,
procedures, or policies should implement in the SOP to ensure the sustainability of each
activity does not conflict with the original goal. Through the observation of the bauxite
activity, there are conflicts with the SOP of each government agency involved in managing
bauxite activities start from the application for approval of the mining license until the post-
mining. Not denying the act has been established, but the question is it relevant with the
current bauxite operation? What about policies and procedures, is it updated according to the
suitability of the activity? This factor contributes to failure in updating SOP to meet current
activity. When the SOP is not fully packed, it will contribute to the failure of the employee's
assessment in ensuring the validity of the bauxite activity. The multiplication of applications
for bauxite mining activities adds to the pressure and failure to comply with the SOPs
provided by the organization. Not surprisingly, we can see that non-compliance issues can
occur that cause damage that negatively impacts the industry. Awareness and training not
given by the organization to the staff contribute to the failure staff acted and not clear their
functionality.

Lack of enforcement and monitoring

Enforcement and weak monitoring contribute to the main factor of failure control in illegal
mining activity. A weakness shows that increase of the illegal mining uncontrol. It is unclear
why this is happening. Among the possibilities for this failure is that there is no clear
guideline and policy for enforcement authorities to take action against illegal miners.
Increased dramatic mining openings made it harder for authorities to take action more
effectively. There is also a cooperation between license miners with illegal miners making it
more difficult for enforcement. It added illegal miners using the power of influence with
stakeholders to free themselves from the grip of enforcement.

Lack of communication between government agencies

Communication is an important element in ensuring process and understanding in performing
the process follow the procedure and policies. Bauxite industry involved several government
agencies where every agency plays its role in ensuring the activity in under control. The
question is how communication between every agency to do monitoring and enforcement.

Schlumberger-Private
The failure of this communication led to misunderstandings among agencies in enforcing
more effective enforcement and observations. As an example, stockpile management involves
several agencies in ensuring that miners comply with the procedure and policies. The
question is how the miner's failure in complies regulation and standard given in manage the
stockpile where the failure cause to the serious pollution even though it is under the control of
several agencies involved. The conflict also arises in between officer from different agencies
in communicating when overcoming the issue.

Lack of officer contribute to the integrity issue

MACC reported Nine Pahang Land and Mines Office (PTG) assistant enforcement officers
were ordered to be remanded seven days to facilitate a probe into alleged graft linked to
illegal bauxite mining in the state. The men, aged between 29 and 59, were suspected of
having received bribes in order to shield bauxite miners who had contravened the existing
moratorium on mining the lucrative mineral in the state. Among others involved is Customs
officer whereas reported he was remanded to facilitate a probe into him allegedly receiving
kickbacks to ignore the shipment of bauxite that was brought by miners to Kuantan Port to be
exported overseas. Why has it happened? What are the factors that have contributed to the
Integrity issue.? The factor that has led to corruption are:
 The Opportunity that is considered open wide when both parties work together to
meet their requirements with risking corrupt practices as a way of making the best of
every one of them, respectively.
 The weakness of personality is a difficult problem dealt with, causing themselves to
be involved in the practice of corruption. Individual weakness affects the value of
itself. The result from the lack of appreciation of true values in carrying out their
duties, the greediness and greed, the desire to live luxuriously and to boast, wanting to
be fast rich and selfish is the driving force of corruption.
 Inadequate procedures, regulations, and weaknesses in the implementation system
solely, may cause a department exposed to treatment such as bribery, abuse, and
abuse of power by officers and staff.
 The problem of the rising cost of living and income or salary received is not worth it
with a challenging current economic environment especially for them living in urban
areas that require tremendous financial resources accommodating the cost of living.

Schlumberger-Private
 This problem caused some parties to be compelled to take the easy way by doing
corrupt practices.

REFERENCES

1. Minerals and Geoscience Department Malaysia. Malaysian Minerals Yearbook 2010.

Kuala Lumpur: Minerals and Geoscience Department Malaysia; 2010. Available

from: http://www.jmg.gov.my/component/rsfiles/downloadfile/files?path=penerbitan

%2FMalaysian+Minerals+Yearbook%2Fmmy_2010.pdf.

2. Abdullah, N. H., Mohamed, N., Sulaiman, L. H., Zakaria, T. A., & Rahim, D. A.

(2016). Potential health impacts of bauxite mining in Kuantan. The Malaysian journal

of medical sciences: MJMS, 23(3), 1.

3. Kusin, F. M., Abd Rahman, M. S., Madzin, Z., Jusop, S., Mohamat-Yusuff, F., &

Ariffin, M. (2017). The occurrence and potential ecological risk assessment of bauxite

mine-impacted water and sediments in Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Environmental

Science and Pollution Research, 24(2), 1306-1321.

4. Snah, A. H., & Halim, A. T. (2017). Position Paper on Sustainable Mining: Case

Study for Bauxite Mining in Pahang. Academy of Sciences, Malaysia. Swannack,

Jervis D.,(1969), Big Juniper House, Mesa Verde National Park-Colorado, 7.

Schlumberger-Private
5. ASM "Sustainable Mining: Case Study for Bauxite Mining in Pahang". issuu. 19

December 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2019.

6. Lee, K. Y., Ho, L. Y., Tan, K. H., Tham, Y. Y., Ling, S. P., Qureshi, A. M., ... &

Nordin, R. (2017). Environmental and occupational health impact of bauxite mining

in Malaysia: a review. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia, 16(2).

Schlumberger-Private