STRT-431 Reading Notes 10-12-21
STRT-431 Reading Notes 10-12-21
Dogfight: In the Secret World Of Airplane Deals, One Battle Up Close --- Boeing, Airbus
Vied to Meet Cutthroat Terms of Iberia; Strong Carriers Call Shots --- Dangling the `Used
Car' Option
Iberia one of a few airlines financially healthy enough to order new planes
“200 airlines and only 2 suppliers”
Iberia went shopping for used airplanes – lots of airlines selling due to industry downturn
All-airbus fleet would reduce operating costs – making cost of including some Boeing
planes higher. High switching cost
Resale price guarantees for planes sold years earlier were coming back to haunt Airbus:
Iberia threatened to just sell all of their planes and replace with Boeing, and Airbus would
be picking up the tab!
Airbus eventually won, by lowering price and providing notable concessions:
Think
Use a Five Forces analysis to understand the threats to (and sources of) profit in the
widebody aircraft market at the time of the Iberia negotiation (2002-2003). Note that the
Wall Street Journal article on the Iberia purchase focuses on price competition. Remember
that you are looking for the fundamental economic issues that lead to price competition,
not just descriptions of the price competition itself.
Suffering airline industry left few companies in financial shape to purchase airplanes. So,
the airlines that did buy had more bargaining power
High switching costs for airlines made new entrants unlikely, made it costly for airlines
to switch between existing manufacturers
Industry decline led to increase in used airplane sales which presented attractive
substitute to customers (airline companies)
In addition to the industry characteristics you described in question 1, describe the factors
particular to Iberia, including actions Enrique Dupuy has taken in the course of the
negotiations, that have helped Iberia obtain very low prices for the planes it is buying.
Dupuy played a hard bargain – gave very few concessions throughout the process. He
made both Boeing and Airbus believe that he was seriously considering purchasing used
aircraft, which were significantly cheaper
Airbus obviously had leverage as the incumbent as switching costs were high, but Dupuy
had negotiated a resale price guarantee on the aircraft which would decrease switching
costs. Made Airbus believe that they might actually sell the entire fleet and replace with
new or used Boeing.
Always was talking about the competitor – ex. would reference his conversations with the
other execs and told Airbus salesperson when he was going to look at used Boeing jets.
Was very transparent.
Consider Boeing’s decision to introduce the 787 Dreamliner aircraft. What threats to
profitability raised by your Five Forces analysis do you think the 787 will address? What
threats will it not address or even exacerbate?
Responded to rival’s creation of the A380 by creating a long-range aircraft that was more
efficient top operate
Boeing adopted a new supply chain strategy for the design and production of the 787
Dreamliner, which resulted in very lengthy delays in bringing the plane to market. Was
this more the consequence of poor strategy or poor execution?
Class discussion
Rivalry
- Only 2 players
+ homogeneity
- Switching costs
+ high buyer motivation
+ large, infrequent sales
+ capacity high relative to demand (9/11)
+ High fixed costs relative to variable costs for manufacturers
Entry
- entry costs are very high
- reputation is important
- Hub + spoke
- Permission from regulators takes a while
+ Government subsidized airlines (COMAC, China)
Substitutes
+ Used planes
- Leasing
Buyer Power
- Many buyers
o + Not many buying at that time
- no willingness to pay for specific planes. People don’t care. Switching isn’t a big deal
so no pressure for buyers to stick with a manufacturer
Supplier power
- Dual sourcing
- Engine manufacturers RR + GE have interests aligned
+ Complexity (parts)
+ Labor