The CARL Framework of Reflection
The CARL Framework of Reflection
reflection
This framework takes you through Context, Action, Results, and
Learning.
Overview
The CARL model is adapted from a job interview technique where you structure each of your
answers according to the different aspect of the model. Given the reflective nature of
successfully answering many job interview questions, this model can easily be used in general
to guide your reflective process on experiences. CARL stands for:
One thing to be conscious of with this model is that it is possible to work through the stages
while only describing at each level. Be sure you stop and ask yourself how and why the things
happened – this will help move it from descriptions to reflections.
Below is further information on the model – each stage is given a fuller description, guiding
questions to ask yourself and a couple of examples of how this might look in a reflection.
This is just one model of reflection. Test it out and see how it works for you. If you find that
only a few of the questions are helpful, focus on those. If you think about each area, you are
likely to engage more critically with your learning experience.
You might really like answering this kind of question, or you maybe you don’t. In either case,
if you took the time to think about the questions you will have started a reflection. Self-
questioning like this, to better understand ourselves, our motivations, and our experiences, is
at the heart of reflection.
You may very well know the process of reflection under different names, for example
‘reviewing’, 'analysing' or ‘processing’.
Below you can find the different sections that together make the Reflection Toolkit.
Reflectors' Toolkit
This section is for people who want to reflect. You will find resources, models and questions
that can help start your reflections and structure them.
Facilitators' Toolkit
Considerations and information about implementing reflection in courses, workshops and
other initiatives.
Literature
This section contains a review of literature on reflection and a list of helpful literature to
explore the area further.
Definition of reflection
For the purpose of this site, reflection or critical reflection is defined as:
the conscious examination of past experiences, thoughts and ways of doing things. Its
goal is to surface learning about oneself and the situation, and to bring meaning to it in
order to inform the present and the future. It challenges the status quo of practice,
thoughts and assumptions and may therefore inform our decisions, actions, attitudes,
beliefs and understanding about ourselves.
Reflection can be used for many things including:
Allowing us to improve our own practice to gain better outcomes in the future
Increasing/improving our performance and skills
Increasing our awareness of our abilities and attributes and our evidence for these
Developing and expanding our employability
Evaluating the quality and success of our action plans
Applying theoretical knowledge/frameworks to real experiences and using this to
expand our understanding of the underlying theory.
The model
The CARL framework of reflection
This model, unlike a fair amount of other reflection models, does not explicitly require further
planned actions. This is not essential for reflection, as identifying new learning is an
extremely valuable process and will in many cases affect practice on its own. The model is
frequently seen in interviews without the ‘learning’ stage; however, it is important to include
this stage in reflection as it allows you to critically extract knowledge and learning from the
situation.
One potential challenge with using this model is that it encourages you to describe throughout
- that is describe the context, the actions, and results and only think about implications in
learning. While there can be benefits from solely describing as it can make you aware of the
consequences of your actions, describing is not the same as being critically reflective. To
ensure that you remain reflective throughout, keep asking yourself the question why – ‘why
did I do what I did?’ etc.
For other models there is a natural place where you introduce and think about relevant
theoretical literature. In this model each step can benefit from literature, as it can help explain
your motivations, for example in actions you might want to use a particular theory to explain
why you chose a specific action above another.
A number of helpful questions are outlined below for each of the sections. You don’t have to
answer all of them, but they can guide you to what sort of things make sense to include in that
section. You might have other questions that work better for you.
Context
Here you will set the context for yourself or the reader. Describe what is essential to
understand the situation.
Helpful questions:
Depending on whether you are presenting the reflection, for example as an interview answer,
or using the model as a helpful framework for your own reflective process, you may wish to
tailor how extensive you are. If doing it for yourself, it can be very helpful to understand a full
comprehensive context, whereas when presenting it to others you may wish to only include
enough that the audience understand the context.
Examples of Context
The examples below show how the reflective process can happen at an overarching process
level and a specific experience level. Both will tackle the same scenario, but their conclusions
can be different. When reflecting both levels can be helpful.
Action
Here you can describe what your actions were in relation to the context specified above. To
critically engage with the reflection, it is important not only to describe your actions, but think
about why you did these actions and not something else.
Helpful questions:
Examples of Action
Developing public speaking as a skill Public speaking individual experience
over time
Results
Here you can discuss the results that came from your actions and what the implications are of
the results.
Helpful questions:
Examples of Results
Developing public speaking as a skill over Public speaking individual experience
time
I gave myself a chance to practise my public I could see that the students were
speaking and I am feeling more comfortable desperately trying to write down everything
standing in front of a group of people now, I said and what was on the slides. However,
just because I have practised. As mentioned I felt confident in my delivery of the
above, I could have structured the content, I didn’t feel a loss of breath or
presentation differently. Having a well- anything, which suggests I’m feeling more
structured presentation would have given confident with public speaking itself. That
me the same feeling of success in terms of said, I didn’t feel like they were actually
public speaking and had a better impact on getting any value from the presentation.
the students. However, from this experience They didn’t seem excited, and no one asked
I now know I can spend less time stressing questions or anything. I think they would
about the public speaking element of it and have gotten more from why they should
spend more time on the actual presentation. study this course, rather than how to apply. I
think equally if I had allowed times for their
questions, they would have gotten much
more value from the situation.
Learning
Here you have a chance to conclude using the insights gained from the three sections above. While not
explicitly suggested by the model, if you want to include an action plan this is a natural place to do so.
Helpful questions:
Examples of Learning
Developing public speaking as a skill over Public speaking individual experience
time
I have learned that I get better at public I have realised if I had spent more time thinking
speaking when I give myself the opportunity to about what information the students needed and
practise in front of people. I will therefore how to present it, it would have been a more
continue to seek out challenges including public impactful experience. The way I presented is an
speaking. However, I have also realised that example of passive learning (people just sitting
while I get similar benefit to my own and receiving information) which has been
development in term of confidence through shown to be less effective than active learning
standing in front of others, I can practise the (people participating in the activity, e.g. Michel
most effective way of delivering the content. In et al, 2009) Therefore, I think using group
the future I have to give myself more time to participation and allowing them to guide the
prepare. discussion by asking questions and following
their interests would have be better. I will ensure
I incorporate interactive activities in my future
presentations.
Adopted from
The CAR model of interview techniques, for example BlueSteps (2011) CAR interview
Technique.
This article was published on 9 Nov, 2018
Website accessibility
Freedom of information publication scheme
Data Protection
MyEd login
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration
number SC005336, VAT Registration Number GB 592 9507 00, and is acknowledged by the
UK authorities as a “Recognised body” which has been granted degree awarding powers.
Below is further information on the model – each stage is given a fuller description, tips about
language use, guiding questions to ask yourself and an example of how this might look in a reflection.
This is just one model of reflection. Test it out and see how it works for you. If you find that only a
few of the questions are helpful, focus on those. However, by thinking about each stage you are likely
to engage more critically with your learning experience.
The model
The 5R framework for reflection
This model lends itself well to structuring both the thinking process and the write-up of a reflection.
To get the full benefit of this model you will have to know the characteristics of each of the 5 R’s.
Being able to recognise the language that is relevant for each step will also benefit you if using the
model for academic reflection.
The ‘Reporting’ and ‘Responding’ can sometimes interlink and be presented as one level. This
highlights the fact that while there is a natural progression through the stages, when producing written
reflections, you might want to write more freely without a clear boundary between the areas.
A number of helpful questions as well as key components are outlined below for each of the stages.
You don’t have to answer all of them, but they can guide you to what sort of things make sense to
include in that stage. You might have other questions that work better for you.
Reporting
Here you can present the context with little or no comment or interpretation of the experience.
What to do What’s included Helpful questions
What happened?
What are the key
aspects of this
The key elements of the situation
A brief description of the situation?
that are essential for you to
experience/problem or issue Who was
communicate the context to reader.
involved?
What did I do?
Key language points: You are reporting on an event that happened so use the past tense.
Helpful phrases are ‘I saw…’, ‘I noticed…’, ‘I/they said…’, ‘I had…’ and words indicating
time such as yesterday, last week, etc.
Example of Reporting
Yesterday, I had a meeting with my supervisor to discuss my final project. I requested the meeting
as I had a series of concerns about the next steps for my methods section of my report. During the
meeting we got side-tracked, spending 30 minutes talking about my literature review, which did not
leave us enough time to discuss what I needed. As a result, I left with no answers to my concerns.
Responding:
Here you can present your reaction or response to the situation. This can be thoughts, feelings,
and observations.
What to do What’s included Helpful questions
How did what
happened make me
feel?
Provide your Your feelings and thoughts about the
What did I think?
personal response to experience, as well as any observations and
the situation. potential questions you have. What made me
think and feel this
way?
Key language points: You are writing about thoughts and feelings that happened, so use the
past tense. Helpful phrases are ‘I felt…’, ‘I thought…’, ‘I believe…’, ‘I think…’. It can be
useful to use transitional language to connect experiences with feelings and thoughts, for
example ‘next’, ’subsequently’, ‘afterwards’, ‘finally’, ‘leading to’ etc.
Example of Responding
When I came out of the meeting, I remember thinking that I had wasted our time, leading me to
feel really frustrated. I think I felt that way because I was hesitant to say to my supervisor that the
conversation on the literature review was not what I wanted to discuss. The reason I was hesitant
is that my supervisor has so much more experience than me, so if they wanted to spend time on
the literature review that was probably the right thing to do. However, given I believe we wasted
our time I realised afterwards that it was probably not the right thing to do.
Relating:
Here you can relate your experience of the reported situation with your knowledge and skills
from outside of the situation.
What to do What’s included Helpful questions
Provide your understanding of Your connections between past Have I seen this
before?
What was
how the situation relates to experiences, your skills, similar/different then?
your own knowledge and past knowledge, you’re Do I have skills and
experiences. understanding and the situation. knowledge to deal
with this?
Key language points: You are commenting on an experience from the past but in the present
so you should consider writing in the present tense. Helpful phrases are ‘This reminds me
of…’, ‘This is like when…’. It can be useful to use comparative language as ‘previously’,
‘similarly’, ‘unlike’, etc.
Example of Relating
I realise that similar things have happened before when I am in meetings with people who have more
experience than I and I don’t have a clear plan. This reminds me of my meeting at work, where I had
a concern I wanted to raise with my boss, but we never got around to it. I think the common factor in
these situations is that I feel that people with more expertise than I always make better decisions than
I do.
Reasoning:
Here you can make sense of the situation in terms of significant factors and, if relevant (for
example if requested in assessments), the theoretical literature relevant to your experience.
Key language points: These are your current thoughts so write in the present tense. Helpful
phrases are ‘I understand that…’, ‘I realise’, ‘For me the most significant aspect...’. It can be
useful to use analytical language as ‘critically’, ‘imply’, ‘support’ (as in supporting evidence),
etc.
Example of reasoning
The most significant thing about the meeting situation is what happens when I am going in with a
vague plan of what I want. I have realised that I do not get the things I need from the meeting. This is
especially problematic when the person I am meeting with has more experience than me. My
previous experience with my boss would support this idea. I think if I address them like peers and not
superiors, I can be differently prepared. I imagine that if I was an expert at leading meetings I would
have a clear plan, which I would state at the beginning of the meeting so that we both know what we
need to discuss. I think what has been holding me back is being afraid of looking bossy. However, if
I look at it from their perspective and see that I am actually saving them time by only meeting once, I
would actually be coming across as professional rather than bossy.
Reconstructing:
Here you make a conclusion about your future plans based on the previous four sections.
What to do What’s included Helpful questions
How would I need
to do this
differently in the
future?
Your deeper understanding and What might work
Reframe or reconstruct summary of the learning. and why?
future practice by drawing Are there different
conclusions from the four You will also have to include an action options?
previous stages. plan, arguing for why it will work.
Are my ideas
Use this to develop an That can be based on literature supported by
action plan for what to do included in the previous stage or from theory?
next. the new knowledge gained from the Can I make
Relating and Reasoning stages. changes to benefit
others?
What might
happen if…?
Key language points: These are your current thoughts about what you want to do in the
future so use the present or future tense. Helpful phrases are ‘I will now…’, ‘I realise’, ‘I have
learned that…’, ‘As a next step, I need to...’. It can be useful to use words indicating future as
‘will’, ‘may’, ‘could’, etc.
Example of reconstructing
Based on the previous reflection stages, I have learned that I need to write an agenda before going
into a meeting. I realise by taking 10 minutes before a meeting to prepare what I need from it, I can
save time for both myself and the person I am meeting with. Firstly, in the meeting, I will share the
agenda, so the objectives are clear from the start to enable the outcome I want. Alternatively, I
could email the person beforehand telling them what I need from the meeting so they can prepare.
I think the latter will work at university, but maybe not at my work where there is no email culture.
I think if I do this, my meetings will be shorter, and I can get what I need from them.
Below is further information on:
The model – each stage is given a fuller description, guiding questions to ask yourself
and an example of how this might look in a reflection
Different depths of reflection – an example of reflecting more briefly using this model
This is just one model of reflection. Test it out and see how it works for you. If you find that
only a few of the questions are helpful for you, focus on those. However, by thinking about
each stage you are more likely to engage critically with your learning experience.
The model
Description
Here you have a chance to describe the situation in detail. The main points to include here
concern what happened. Your feelings and conclusions will come later.
Helpful questions:
What happened?
When and where did it happen?
Who was present?
What did you and the other people do?
What was the outcome of the situation?
Why were you there?
What did you want to happen?
Example of 'Description'
Group work assignment
For an assessed written group-work assignment, my group (3 others from my course) and I decided to
divide the different sections between us so that we only had to research one element each. We
expected we could just piece the assignment together in the afternoon the day before the deadline,
meaning that we didn’t have to schedule time to sit and write it together. However, when we sat down
it was clear the sections weren’t written in the same writing style. We therefore had to rewrite most of
the assignment to make it a coherent piece of work. We had given ourselves enough time before the
deadline to individually write our own sections, however we did not plan a great deal of time to
rewrite if something were to go wrong. Therefore, two members of the group had to drop their plans
that evening so the assignment would be finished in time for the deadline.
Feelings
Here you can explore any feelings or thoughts that you had during the experience and how
they may have impacted the experience.
Helpful questions:
Example of 'Feelings'
Group work assignment
Before we came together and realised, we still had a lot of work to do, I was quite happy and thought
we had been smart when we divided the work between us. When we realised, we couldn’t hand in
the assignment like it was, I got quite frustrated. I was certain it was going to work, and therefore I
had little motivation to actually do the rewriting. Given that a couple of people from the group had to
cancel their plans I ended up feeling quite guilty, which actually helped me to work harder in the
evening and get the work done faster. Looking back, I’m feeling satisfied that we decided to put in
the work.
Evaluation
Here you have a chance to evaluate what worked and what didn’t work in the situation. Try to
be as objective and honest as possible. To get the most out of your reflection focus on both the
positive and the negative aspects of the situation, even if it was primarily one or the other.
Helpful questions:
Example of 'Evaluation'
Group work assignment
The things that were good and worked well was the fact that each group member produced good
quality work for the agreed deadline. Moreover, the fact that two people from the group cancelled
plans motivated us to work harder in the evening. That contributed positively to the group’s work
ethic. The things that clearly didn’t work was that we assumed we wrote in the same way, and
therefore the overall time plan of the group failed.
Analysis
The analysis step is where you have a chance to make sense of what happened. Up until now
you have focused on details around what happened in the situation. Now you have a chance to
extract meaning from it. You want to target the different aspects that went well or poorly and
ask yourself why. If you are looking to include academic literature, this is the natural place to
include it.
Helpful questions:
Example of 'Analysis'
Group work assignment
I think the reason that our initial division of work went well was because each person had a say in
what part of the assignment they wanted to work on, and we divided according to people’s self-
identified strengths. I have experienced working this way before and discovered when I’m working by
myself, I enjoy working in areas that match my strengths. It seems natural to me that this is also the
case in groups.
I think we thought that this approach would save us time when piecing together the sections in the end,
and therefore we didn’t think it through. In reality, it ended up costing us far more time than expected
and we also had to stress and rush through the rewrite. I think the fact we hadn’t planned how we
were writing and structuring the sections led us to this situation.
I searched through some literature on group work and found two things that help me understand the
situation. Belbin’s (e.g. 2010) team roles suggests that each person has certain strengths and
weaknesses they bring to a group. While we didn’t think about our team members in the same way
Belbin does, effective teamwork and work delegation seems to come from using people’s different
strengths, which we did.
Another theory that might help explain why we didn’t predict the plan wouldn’t work is ‘Groupthink’
(e.g. Janis, 1991). Groupthink is where people in a group won’t raise different opinions to a dominant
opinion or decision, because they don’t want to seem like an outsider. I think if we had challenged our
assumptions about our plan - by actually being critical, we would probably have foreseen that it
wouldn’t work. Some characteristics of groupthink that were in our group were: ‘collective
rationalisation’ – we kept telling each other that it would work; and probably ‘illusion of
invulnerability’ – we are all good students, so of course we couldn’t do anything wrong.
I think being aware of groupthink in the future will be helpful in group work, when trying to make
decisions.
Conclusions
In this section you can make conclusions about what happened. This is where you summarise
your learning and highlight what changes to your actions could improve the outcome in the
future. It should be a natural response to the previous sections.
Helpful questions:
Example of a 'Conclusion'
Group work assignment
I learned that when a group wants to divide work, we must plan how we want each section to look and
feel – having done this would likely have made it possible to put the sections together and submit
without much or any rewriting. Moreover, I will continue to have people self-identify their strengths
and possibly even suggest using the ‘Belbin team roles’-framework with longer projects. Lastly, I
learned that we sometimes have to challenge the decisions we seem to agree on in the group to ensure
that we are not agreeing just because of groupthink.
Action plan
At this step you plan for what you would do differently in a similar or related situation in the
future. It can also be extremely helpful to think about how you will help yourself to act
differently – such that you don’t only plan what you will do differently, but also how you will
make sure it happens. Sometimes just the realisation is enough, but other times reminders
might be helpful.
Helpful questions:
When I’m working with a group next time, I will talk to them about what strengths they have.
This is easy to do and remember in a first meeting, and also potentially works as an icebreaker if
we don’t know each other well. Next, if we decide to divide work, I will insist that we plan out
what we expect from it beforehand. Potentially I would suggest writing the introduction or first
section together first, so that we have a reference for when we are writing our own parts. I’m
confident this current experience will be enough to remind me to suggest this if anyone says we
should divide up the work in the future. Lastly, I will ask if we can challenge our initial decisions
so that we are confident we are making informed decisions to avoid groupthink. If I have any
concerns, I will tell the group. I think by remembering I want the best result possible will make
me be able to disagree even when it feels uncomfortable.
Describe:
In a group work assignment, we divided sections according to people’s strengths. When we tried
to piece the assignment together it was written in different styles and therefore, we had to spend
time rewriting it.
Feelings:
I thought our plan would work and felt good about it. When we had to rewrite it, I felt frustrated.
Evaluation:
The process of dividing sections went well. However, it didn’t work not having foreseen/planned
to rewrite the sections for coherence and writing styles.
Analysis:
Dividing work according to individual strengths is useful. Belbin’s team roles (2010) would
suggest something similar. I have done it before, and it seems to work well.
The reason piecing work together didn’t work was we had no plan for what it needed to look
like. We were so focused on finishing quickly that no one would raise a concern. The last part
can be explained by ‘groupthink’ (e.g. Jarvis, 1991), where members of a group make a
suboptimal decision because individuals are afraid of challenging the consensus.
Conclusion:
I learned that using people’s strengths is efficient. Moreover, planning how we want the work to
look, before we go off on our own is helpful. Lastly, I will remember the dangers of groupthink,
and what the theory suggests to look out for.
Action plan:
I will use Belbin’s team roles to divide group work in the future. Moreover, I will suggest writing
one section together before we do our own work, so we can mirror that in our own writing.
Finally, I will speak my mind when I have concerns, by remembering it can benefit the outcome.
Adapted from
Gibbs G (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further
Education Unit. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford.
Terms such as ‘goals’, ‘objectives’, ‘habits’ and ‘values can have multiple meanings and
connotations. For clarity, in this section we use the following definitions.
The ERA model
a set of prompts for general and broad reflection for example, ‘What were my biggest
challenges and highlights over the last day/week/month/year?’
a set of specific topics they want to reflect on for example, ‘Situations where I
had/could have had a positive impact on those around me over the last week’ or
‘Experiences where I used my critical thinking over the last day’.
Example: Some people may want to increase their impact in their part-time job or
volunteering role because it is in a field, they are interested in pursuing a career and an area
that is personally important to them. In their weekly reflective check-in, they identify that
they have made some progress in better supporting those they are working/volunteering with.
But they may also realise that all the impact has been in a narrow area and will not help them
develop the broader experience and understanding needed to build a career in this field. As a
result, they may adjust their plans and next week will indicate their interest in opportunities in
other areas, and over the next month will look for chances to support and learn more from
people in other areas.
performing a structured review of how your expectations and aspirations of the last
day/week/month/year compared with reality, and then creating/adjusting plans for
your upcoming day/week/month/year.
creating a broader set of reflective prompts to help you review your last
day/week/month/year in more general terms to identify learning and then
creating/adjusting plans for your next cycle.
Both approaches are expanded below. Whatever approach you use, reflect on the balance of
how you use your time and energy – does it reflect your values, goals and objectives?
Looking ahead, will you naturally have more or less time for certain types of activities?
Should you adjust your expectations accordingly?
look ahead and specify what you hope to achieve between now and your next review
look back at whether we have managed to be successful since our last review
identify what you can learn as a result and what your next plans should be
look ahead and specify what you hope to achieve with these new plans, taking account
of what you know about what is coming up.
This cycle can continue for as long as it is useful. It is helpful to sometimes also review how
your approach to reflecting can be improved.
What were 3 things that went well today/this week? How do you know?
What was a situation today/this week where I could have done better? How?
What was your biggest challenge today/this week? How did you overcome it?
What was the predominant feeling you had today/this week? Why?
What made you happy/sad/frustrated/angry/etc today/this week? Can you find some
way of having more or less of the identified aspects?
Some large-scale questions that people ask include:
As with structured reviews, the cycle of planning ahead, reviewing experience, extracting
learning and planning for what is coming up next, can be continued for as long as it is useful.
It is helpful to sometimes also review how your approach to reflecting can be improved
Values
Increasing your self-awareness of your values.
Goal setting
Using a reflective approach to set effective goals.
Analysing experiences
This approach works for finding both strengths and weaknesses, the only difference is the
type of experience you look at. First, identify an experience that turned out/went really well
(for strengths) or poorly (for weaknesses). This could be supporting a friend, or a teamwork
experience that didn’t go as you hoped.
In reality this method can be used to identify many implicit aspects of ourselves – the only
difference is asking ourselves ‘What [value/assumption/etc] may have contributed to the
outcome of the situation or our actions?’
Asking others
Once you have an idea of your own strengths and weaknesses, or to get you started if you find
it challenging, you can ask a critical friend (see ‘Reflection with others’) to suggest what they
think your strengths and weaknesses are. Remember to reflect on what they say to see if you
agree – it is just their opinion and experience, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are right. If
you don’t agree, it is useful to think about why they might experience you in that way.
Reflecting with others (within Reflectors’ Toolkit)
It can then be helpful to review your answers, consider what values these may represent, and
capture all the values on a list.
Once you have a list it can be beneficial to rank your top 5 or top 10 and save it for reference.
If you don’t find it easy to rank your values, you can start by trying to identify those at the top
of your list by asking yourself questions like ‘If I could only have one of these two things in
my life, which would I choose?’
Each of these is summarised below along with prompts to ensure you are reflective in the
process.
Importance
Many models highlight the importance of finding a goal that is important for you. There
might be many things that are important to you, so how do you realise that your goal is
essential to you?
You might ask yourself reflective questions such as:
Specificity
Goals need to be sufficiently specific so that you know when you have achieved it.
For instance, a common goal might be to ‘get better at X’, but how do you know you have
gotten better? Is it when someone else recognise it? Is it a feeling? Is it learning one fact
about the thing you want to improve on?
To ensure specificity, the main questions you need to ask yourself are something like:
By being reflective when setting your goals, you will help yourself to optimise your chance of
being successful.
Writing a letter to your future self
This activity is about imagining where you are and who you are going to be sometime in the
future. Five years is often used as the point in the future to envision as it is both far enough
away that your life could be completely different, but close enough for it to seem tangible.
This letter will focus on who you want to be and what you have accomplished between now
and then.
Steps
Identify a date in the future (for example five years)
Write the letter to yourself to be received on that day in the future
Write it as an actual letter
In your letter address questions like the following:
o Who do I want to be?
o Where do I want to be?
o What do I want to have done?
o Who do I want to be with?
o What of my hobbies have I developed?
o What friends do I still see and prioritise?
o What kind of new friends have I made? Where sorts of places did, I meet
them?
Once drafted, read the letter again. Does it seem right? Do you want to make any
changes?
When you are happy with your letter, continue to the next step immediately or put it
away for a couple of days and then return to it (recommended).
Now reflect on your life as it is currently. Ask yourself questions like the following:
o Am I on track to be there in 5 years? (or whatever period you chose)
o What changes will I have to make right now to make this a reality?
o What are the first steps I can make today?
o How will my strengths and weaknesses help or hinder me getting there?
There is great value in both writing the letter and doing the assessment of your current
direction. It can be valuable to do the reflection of your current state a while after originally
writing the letter. Start by rereading it.
Remember that where we see ourselves in the future is likely to change, and therefore doing
this activity occasionally can help you assure that you are heading the right direction.
Steps
Identify a date in the past – you might choose one immediately before a transition (for
example, before going to university or a big life change)
Write the letter to yourself to be received on that day
Write it as an actual letter
In the letter address questions like the following:
o What are some of the main things you have learned since then?
o What should your past self-look out for?
o What is the best advice you could give your past self?
o What would you tell yourself to get through some of the challenges that you
faced?
o What would you tell yourself about your successes and the way you dealt with
them?
o What type of people have helped you along the way?
o What type of people have made life harder?
o Who do you wish you had spent more time with?
Once done read the letter again. Does it seem right? Do you want to make any
changes?
When you are happy with your letter, continue to the next step immediately or put it
away for a couple of days and then return to it (recommended).
Now reflect on your life as it is currently. Ask yourself questions like the following:
o Of the advice you have given to your past self, how much of it are you
following today? How could you follow the advice better?
o Are there some people or types of people you wish you had spent more or less
time with? How can you change that now?
o What else can you take away and apply better to your life and your immediate
future?
There is great value in both writing the letter and doing the assessment of your current
direction. It can be valuable to do the reflection of you current state a while after originally
writing the letter. Start by rereading it.
Remember that hindsight is wonderful, but it is not realistic or fair to expect that in the past
we could have anticipated all that would come. The aim of this letter is to reflect on and learn
from our experiences, and to use this reflection to inform our current and future thinking and
behaviour.
Choosing to be relatively free in the range of items This can be fun as it will challenge reflectors to
from which a reflector can choose means that the be creative with their choices, however some
reflector can find something that works them, but people might find it hard.
it may seem overwhelming and hard to choose.
The easiest way of making the range of choices
This can be questions like: smaller is having a set of items in front of the
reflector that they must choose from. Another
Pick any song… way is to ask the reflector to bring the item with
Pick any item… them.
Questions may look like
One characteristic of this type of question is often
that you don’t actually need the physical item but
From this set of…
can talk about or describe it.
Items you have in your room
Starting questions
Questions tend to follow a pattern like ‘What [prescribed type or source of
item] represents [area you want to explore]?
Below are some examples that can be mixed and matched.
Reflective A racing car, because when I get on track, I’m very quick and dedicated and I will
answer go as fast as I can until it’s solved. However, just like a racing car, I need a team
around me to make sure that everything else (like the engine or getting food) is
functioning such that I can just focus on the problem.
Reflective A four-wheel drive jeep, I might not be very fast when solving problems, but I can
answer solve a range of challenges – just like being able to go into all types of terrain.
Solutions may not look flashy, but they are dependable.
Non- A Ferrari, because I like them and would want one – they are fast.
reflective
answer