Reengineering: Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. It Was Written by An MIT Engineer Called Michael Hammer
Reengineering: Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. It Was Written by An MIT Engineer Called Michael Hammer
Continuous improvement had been around for a long time. But in 1990, a Harvard Business
Review article exploded the idea of incremental change, with its provocative title: Reengineering
Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate. It was written by an MIT engineer called Michael Hammer.
And three years later, James Champy wrote a book with top management consultant,
Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution was a rallying cry for
the consulting industry. But in the few years that followed, hundreds of companies employed
thousands of consultants to reengineer their processes and, in so-doing, remove tens of
thousands from their workforces.
The business process reengineering (BPR) means a systematic, disciplined approach to reducing
organizational costs and redundant business processes involving the analysis of existing human
and automated workflows.
• Strategy
• Organization
• Process
• Technology
• Culture
1. Define Objectives and Framework: First of all, the objective of re-engineering must be defined
in the quantitative and qualitative terms. The objectives are the end results that the management
desires after the reengineering. Once the objectives are defined, the need for change should be
well communicated to the employees because, the success of BPR depends on the readiness of
the employees to accept the change.
2. Identify Customer Needs: While, redesigning the business process the needs of the
customers must be taken into prior consideration. The process shall be redesigned in such a way
that it clearly provides the added value to the customer. One must take the following parameters
into the consideration:
o Type of Customer and customer groups.
o Customer’s expected utilities in product and services
o Customer requirements, buying habits and consuming tendencies.
o Customer problems and expectations about the product or service.
3. Study the Existing Process: Before deciding on the changes to be made in the existing
business process, one must analyse it carefully. The existing process provides a base for the new
process and hence “what” and “why” of the new process can be well designed by studying the
right and wrongs of the existing business plan.
4. Formulate a Redesign Business Plan: Once the existing business process is studied
thoroughly, the required changes are written down on a piece of paper and are converted into an
ideal re-design process. Here, all the changes are chalked down, and the best among all the
alternatives is selected.
5. Implement the Redesign: Finally, the changes are implemented into the redesign plan to
achieve the dramatic improvements. It is the responsibility of both the management and the
designer to operationalize the new process and gain the support of all.
Thus, the business process reengineering is collection of interrelated tasks or activities designed
to accomplish the specified outcome.
Benefits:
BPR or business process reengineering is the central revaluating and radical update of business
procedures to accomplish various upgrades in primary, contemporary proportions of execution like
cost, quality, administration, and speed.
Improved consumer loyalty is frequently an essential point. There are various pros and cons of
business process reengineering.
2. BPR helps in building a strategic view of operational procedures by making radical inquiries
about how processes are improved and how things could be done.
5. Provides improved viability and adequacy to an organization by eliminating the delay and
unessential phases of operations and management.
Business Process reengineering isn’t always easy. There have been some challenges revolving
around the usage of BPR since its inception, like objections, issues, and problems. Business
process reengineering disadvantages include:
1. It doesn’t suit every business need as it depends on factors like size and availability of
resources. It usually benefits large organizations.
2. In some cases, the efficiency of one department was improved at the expense of the overall
process.
3. This BPR approach does not provide an immediate resolution. It concentrates significantly
upon long haul income collaborations of a business which not only takes some effort to take
shape but are hard to gauge as well
5. It can replace humans when it comes to getting the job done error-free hence posing as a
real threat to jobs.
2. Identify all the organization’s processes and prioritize them in order of redesign urgency
3. Integrate information processing work into the real work that produces the information
5. Link Parallel activities in the workflow instead of just integrating their results
6. Put the decision point where the work is performed, and build control into the process