Tabletalk Magazine August 2008
Tabletalk Magazine August 2008
0 0
T H E N E W
AT H E I SM
S ince hearing about the supposedly “new” atheism I have been trying to figure
out what’s so new about it. Its proponents are not saying anything different
than their atheist ancestors have said throughout history. In truth, they are sim-
ply using the same old spin on a new generation of skeptics. Take, for instance,
new atheism proponent Richard Dawkins’ assertions. In his article “On Debating
Religion,” he writes, “The hypothesis of God offers no worthwhile explanation
for anything” and “faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need
to think and evaluate evidence.” In his book The Selfish Gene, he writes, “Faith is
powerful enough to immunize people against all
The new breed of appeals to pity, to forgiveness, to decent human
atheists employ feelings.” None of this seems all that different from
the old atheism of Karl Marx, who in 1844 wrote in
popular-level his introduction to A Contribution to the Critique
of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: “Religion is the sigh
arg uments to of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless
give them the world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the
opium of the people.”
broadest appeal. The trouble with this new atheism is that it is
not new at all but is the same old humanistic ser-
mon that has been proclaimed on the soap box of cynicism throughout the ages.
Nevertheless, perhaps what’s most troubling is that these new atheists employ
popular-level arguments in order to give them the broadest appeal.
What is even more troubling is that many Christians have shut their mouths
and closed their eyes, pretending that this humanistic, atheistic nonsense will
all just go away without affecting our churches or our children. Make no mistake
about it, the Lord God Almighty reigns, and because His kingdom shall overcome,
we shall overcome by His grace and before His face, coram Deo. And although
these new atheists might call us deluded Christians, they are most certainly not
deluded in their mission to convert the undiscerning world to the god of atheism —
they know full well for whom they’re working as they seek new ways to suppress
the eternal truth of God in their unrighteousness (Rom. 1:18).
Burk Parsons is editor of Tabletalk magazine and minister of
congregational life at Saint Andrew’s Chapel in Sanford, Florida.
Tabletalk (usps 009-013) is published monthly by Ligonier Ministries, Inc., 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746. Annual subscription price (12 issues): $20.00.
Periodicals postage paid at Lake Mary, FL, and additional mailing offices. The daily Bible studies are copyright 2008, Ligonier Ministries, Inc. Unless noted, all Scripture
quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Copyright 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Ligonier Ministries, 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746-6229.
IN THIS ISSUE
contents
{ THE NEW ATHEISM }
A U G U S T 2008
F E A T U R E S VO LU M E 32 | N U M BER 8
4
Faith and Reason
DA I LY S T U D I E S
10 God’s Dupes?
BY RAVI K. ZACHARIAS C O L U M N S
14
64 Pastor’s Perspective
By Philip G. Ryken
68 Pro Ecclesia: For the Church
By Carl R. Trueman
Has Science
Got Rid of God? 70 Generation to Generation
BY JOHN BLANCHARD By Steven J. Lawson
74 Tolle Lege: Take Up and Read
By Keith A. Mathison
18 80 Seek Ye First
By R.C. Sproul Jr.
82 Truth and Consequences
The True Face of Evil
BY DAVID A. ROBERTSON By Gene Edward Veith
T RU E FA I T H I N VOLV E S T RUS T I NG I N
T H E E V I DE NC E T H AT G OD H A S A M P LY
o p eo
of e pl
plee wo
worl
rlldw
dwid
i e ea
id e ch yea
earr th
thro
r ug
ro ugh
h raa di
dioo an
nd
I te
In t rn
rnet
et b
bro
road
ro ad
dca
c st
stss of Re
Rene
newi
ne w ng You
wi ourr Mi
M nd
n d w itt h
Dr. R.
Dr R C. S
Spr oull, re
prrou
prou r sour
so
our
urce
ce m
mat
ater
at eria
er ials
ia l , Ta
ls Tabl
blet
bl alk magg az
etal
et alk
al a in
ineee,,
inte
in tern
te r at
rn atio
iona
io nall tr
na tran
an
n sllat
at io
atio
ionn ef
effo
fort
fo rts,
rt s, con
onfe
f re
fe r nc
nces
e , an
es nd ou
ur
w b si
we site
te.. We a re
te re a lw
way
ayss se
seek
ekin
ek
k in
ingg ne
neww wa
w ys to to
touc
ucch more
mo
oree
p op
pe ople
le w
wit
ith
it h th
he me
m ss
ssag
agee off G od
ag o ’ss h
hol
o in
ol ines
esss an
es nd the
th
he tr
trut
uh
ut
o H iss Wor
of ord.
d If yo
youu ar
aree givi
g ivi
gi ving
n to us
ng u
f ina
fi na nccia
na
nanc iall
lllly,, pleas
leeas
asee know
kn
now
w t ha
h t no
none
n of
ne
th
h iiss wou
u ld
l bbee po
p ss
ssib
i le w itt h
ib hoout
u you
ourr
g ne
ge nero
rous
ro u a nd f ai
us aith
thfu
th fu
u l su
upp
p or
ort.
t I f no
t. ot,
t
w h
we hop
opee th
op h att you
u w ill l prray
ayer
yerr fu
full
l y co
ll cons
nssid
derr jjoi
oini
oi n i ngg u ss..
ni
A a ttok
As oken
ok en of ou
u r ap
ppr
prec
e iaatiio
ec onn , paa rt
rtne
neers
r reecceive
eiivvee The
h
Mee ss
M s ag
agee off t he
he Mon
onth
t h f ro
th om R.
R C.
C Spr
prou
oul,
ou l,, a s ub
ubsc
scri
c ri
r pt
ptio
io
ion
on
t o Ta
to e allk m agg az
Tabllet
Tabl a z in
i e, a nd
d exc
xclu
lusi
lu siivee u
upd
pdat
pd att es
e on tth
he
mini
mi nii st
stry
ry’s
ry ’ss pro
rogr
gres
gr e s.
es s
H E A LT H A N D G R OW T H
OF OUR MINISTRY
www.ligonier.org/partner
or call 800-435-4343.
Ministry
Partner
B Y R A V I K . Z A C H A R I A S
giver if you have a moral law? The things, and desperately sick; who
answer is because the questioner can understand it?” (Jer. 17:9).
and the issue he or she questions Similarly, the apostle James said,
always involve the essential value “But be doers of the word, and not
of a person. You can never talk of hearers only, deceiving yourselves.
morality in abstraction. Persons For if anyone is a hearer of the word
are implicit to the question and the and not a doer, he is like a man who
object of the question. In a nutshell, looks intently at his natural face
positing a moral law without a in a mirror. For he looks at himself
moral lawgiver would be equivalent and goes away and at once forgets
to raising the question of evil with- what he was like. But the one who
out a questioner. So you cannot have looks into the perfect law, the law
a moral law unless the moral law of liberty, and perseveres, being no
itself is intrinsically woven into per- hearer who forgets but a doer who
sonhood. This means that an intrin- acts, he will be blessed in his doing”
sically worthy person must exist if (James 1:22–25).
the moral law itself is to be valued. The world does not understand
And that person can only be God. what the absoluteness of the moral
Our inability to alter what is law is all about. Some get caught,
actual frustrates our grandiose some don’t get caught. Yet who of us
delusions of being sovereign over would like our heart exposed on the
everything. Yet the truth is that we front page of the newspaper today?
cannot escape the existential rub by Have there not been days and hours
running from a moral law. Objective when, like Paul, you’ve struggled
moral values exist only if God within yourself and said, “I do not
exists. Is it all right, for example, to understand my own actions. For I
mutilate babies for entertainment? do not do what I want, but I do the
Every reasonable person will say very thing I hate…. Wretched man
“no.” We know that objective moral that I am! Who will deliver me from
values do exist. Therefore, God must this body of death?” (Rom. 7:15, 24).
exist. Examining those premises Each of us knows this tension and
and their validity presents a very conflict within if we are honest
strong argument. with ourselves.
The prophet Jeremiah noted, Therefore, as Christians, we
“The heart is deceitful above all ought to take time to reflect seri-
wh at t he a b s olut ene s s of t he
c au g ht , s ome don’t g e t c au g ht .
R
ichard Dawkins, based at Britain, he stepped up to the plate and
Oxford Universit y, off i- let fly with his trademark panache: “I
cially operates under the think science really has fulfilled the
title of Charles Simonyi Reader and need that religion did in the past, of
Professor of the Public Understanding explaining things; why we are here,
of Science. Unofficially, he may be the what is the origin of life, where did
best-known atheist in the world, part- the world come from, what life is all
ly as the result of his best-selling book about…science has the answers.”
The God Delusion, published in 2006. If Dawkins is right, religion is
With these credentials, we should an outdated indulgence and God an
expect Dawkins to answer the title of irrelevant myth. But is he right? The
this article with a resounding yes, and simplest way to answer that question
he does not disappoint us. In a 1999 is to test each of his four claims to see
BBC Television programme Soul of whether they can be substantiated.
Two things need to be said in response. they first begin thinking about the
First, where is the scientific proof that subject, and scientists have come up
the appearance of design is deceiv- with an endless raft of theories. Yet
ing us? There is none — and to deny science can never go any further back
design before discussing the issue is on than the moment at which the laws
a par with declaring that miracles are on which it leans began to operate. As
impossible before finding out whether Edgar Andrews, emeritus professor of
any have taken place. This illogical materials at the University of London,
approach might be expected from notes, “Science, even at its most spec-
someone at grade school, but hardly ulative, must stop short of offering any
from an Oxford don. Second, can sci- explanation or even description of the
ence prove that the designer must have actual event of origin.”
been designed, in other words, that This seems pretty obvious, yet
the ultimate Creator must have been there are atheists who try to evade the
created? Is there any branch of science issue with a flurry of phrases. Peter
that can definitively rule out any pos- Atkins, an atheist professor of chem-
sibility of there being a supernatural, istry at Oxford, claims that the entire
uncreated person? universe is “an elaborate and engaging
As Ludwig Wittgenstein, the lead- rearrangement of nothing” in which
ing analytical philosopher of the “space-time generates its own dust in
twentieth century, said in his monu- the process of its own self-assembly.”
mental Tractatus: “The solution of the Those who hold to this idea, more for-
riddle of life in space and time lies out- mally known as the quantum fluctua-
side space and time.” This synchro- tion hypothesis, were neatly upended
nizes precisely with the Bible’s teach- in New Scientist: “First there was
ing about God being “from everlasting nothing, then there is something...and
to everlasting” (Ps. 106:48) and its before you know it they have pulled a
unanimous testimony that this tran- hundred billion galaxies out of their
scendent and eternal Creator “gives quantum hats.” In A Brief History of
life to all things” (1 Tim. 6:13). Time, the renowned theoretical physi-
cist Stephen Hawking, with no reli-
Science explains gious axe to grind, has a much more
where the world came from. reasonable approach. Commenting on
the odds against the universe’s incred-
EVIL
B Y D A V I D A . R O B E R T S O N
D E TA I L O F WO M A N W I T H A M A SK BY LO RENZO L IPPI (16 0 6 −16 65), MUSEE D ES BE AUX-A RT S, A NGER S, FR A NCE / BRID GEM A N A RT L IBR A RY
R
“ eligion is an insult to human should a Christian respond? We
dignity. With or without it, will leave the Muslims, Hindus,
you’d have good people doing Mormons, and Jedi Knights to
good things and evil people doing evil respond for themselves, although we
things. But for good people to do evil note in passing that it is another fun-
things, it takes religion.” So writes damental belief of the atheist creed
the Nobel Prize-winning American that all religions are essentially the
physicist Steven Weinberg. His same — hence the oft repeated state-
observation has become a standard ment or accusation that “atheists
mantra of the new atheism. So how do not fly planes into skyscrapers.”
If There’s a God,
Why Are There Atheists?
BY R . C . S P RO U L
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
ACTS 20:7–35 “Fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing
the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking
twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them” (vv. 29–30).
4
H istorically speaking, divergent viewpoints have existed within the church
since the days of the apostles. Christians have always had to live in com-
munity with other believers who do not agree with them on every single point,
and they have had to do so in a way that keeps “the unity of the Spirit in the bond
of peace” (Eph. 4:3). As an example of this, Paul in Romans 14 clearly intends to
bring civility to Christians who are arguing over matters of diet and calendar.
No matter the particular issue, all disagreements occur only because one
or more parties in the disagreement are at least partially in error. Both you and
I can be wrong when we differ over something, but we cannot both be totally
right. Not every error is a legitimate cause for division, and differences must be
tolerated whenever they do not undermine Christian faith. Paul in Romans 14
makes this point, telling certain Christians not to judge other Christians who
abstain from meat (mostly Jews still concerned with purity laws) even though
no food is unclean in itself (v. 14). As long as the consciences of “the weak” did
not bind the consciences of “the strong,” their view of food was tolerable.
Other errors deny those very beliefs that set Christians apart from all other
people, that is, they deny those truths without which the Christian faith is
impossible. Denials of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and other such matters are
errors that we refer to as heresies. To preserve the purity of its testimony to the
one, true God, the church has historically stood against heresy, calling councils
and writing creeds to define the boundaries of orthodoxy.
Traditionally, heretics have been unwilling to admit that they do not affirm
Christianity as it has been handed down throughout the ages. This problem was
compounded beginning in the nineteenth century when heretics were increas-
ingly able to stay in their churches without being disciplined for their aberrant
views. Many unbelievers today are leaders in some Protestant denominations,
which have suffered a mass exodus of members. The complicity of many church
bodies in looking the other way when soul-damning lies are taught has forced
many to flee these churches lest they be devoured by the wolves.
T hroughout history men have appeared who would become famous for seek-
ing peace at any price. Perhaps the greatest twentieth-century example of
such a figure is the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain who in 1938
proclaimed that he had achieved “peace in our time” with Adolf Hitler even as
he was preparing to unleash his blitzkrieg on Europe. Chamberlain’s aversion
to hostility was so great that Hitler played him for a fool.
Conflict is something that most people, when given the opportunity, try to
avoid. Peace is so desirable that significant differences between individuals and
groups are often ignored, and unity is sought under the lowest common denom-
inator. When peace is sought under these auspices, it can be easy to ignore
the importance of truth altogether. The modern heirs of nineteenth-century
Christian liberalism reveal such tendencies. In the drive to live peaceably with
other professing believers and even other non-Christian religions, liberalism
has tended to redefine Christianity as “the universal fatherhood of God and the
universal brotherhood of man,” or some other innocuous definition. Ironically,
liberals tend to tolerate any kind of belief system unless it happens to represent
orthodox, biblical faith.
We cannot, however, judge mainline Protestantism without recognizing that
these problems are increasingly evident within evangelicalism. Even though
many different denominations were born out of the Protestant Reformation,
evangelicals have traditionally confessed the inerrancy of Scripture and the
doctrine of justification by faith alone whether they were Lutherans, Baptists,
Anglicans, Presbyterians, and so on. Today, unfortunately, the desire for unity
means that such essential doctrines are often diminished so that Protestants,
Roman Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox can all get along. Professing evangeli-
cals no longer necessarily believe that justification by faith alone is an essential
doctrine — even though without it there is no Gospel (Gal. 1:6–9; 2:15–16).
If Christian unity is to mean anything, it must be a unity of faith grounded in
the truth. To sacrifice conviction for “peace” is to have no conviction at all.
the vitriol shown over the less important points of doctrine. Let us be passion- THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
ate for the truth, but let us not divide unless Christian orthodoxy is at stake. Psalms 75–76
Romans 7
6
EPHESIANS 1:1
To the saints who are in Ephesus, and are faithful
in Christ Jesus” (v. 1).
Objections Answered
BY R . C . S P RO U L
NEW
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
This ove
overview series is a thorough presentation of
classical apologetics that equips the believer to defend
existence of God and defend the reliability of
the exist
Scripture and the deity of Christ.
DEF04DC Z 11 DVDS Z (REG. $96) $76.80
DEF04CC Z 11 CDS Z (REG. $68) $54.40
DEF04BH Z HARDCOVER, 208 PAGES Z (REG. $20) $16
DEF04U Z STUDY GUIDE Z (REG. $10) $8
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
M any Protestants wonder why they profess belief in the “holy catholic
church” when they recite the Nicene Creed. Is this a confession of alle-
giance to the pope? If a church is not in communion with the Roman Catholic
Church, why would it affirm this part of the creed?
The answer, of course, is that the “holy catholic church” and the “Roman
Catholic Church” are not identical. The term catholic simply means “universal,”
and in the creeds of the church it refers to the reality that the one church of
Jesus Christ is not limited to any particular geographical region, ethnicity, eco-
nomic class, age group, historical era, or sex. When we say that we believe in the
“catholic church,” we are simply affirming that the church is made up of people
from all kinds of backgrounds. Anyone who turns from sin and trusts Jesus
alone for salvation is a part of the church universal (Gal. 3:28).
Practically speaking, this means that English-speaking Christians can find
brothers and sisters in Chinese house churches. Indians, Arabs, and Europeans
can all worship together freely. Africans who meet for worship in a chapel made
with mud bricks have less in common with countrymen who do not know Christ
than they do with Brazilians who praise God thousands of miles away. Even
when verbal communication is impossible, two believers have intimate fellow-
ship with one another because both are united to Jesus, who enables them to be
in union with every other believer on earth and in heaven.
Today’s passage is a good picture of catholicity as it applies to Christians
from all times and places. When we come into worship we enter into the heav-
enly sanctuary and join with “the spirits of the righteous made perfect” (Heb.
12:22–24). Though this reality is not apparent to our eyes, our worship includes
not only the members of our individual church but Moses, Esther, Augustine,
Calvin, and every other believer from history are worshiping as well.
Most importantly, when the body of Christ gathers for worship, Jesus is pres-
ent in ways He is not present at other times. This is hard to understand, but it is
true and should make us all the more eager never to miss corporate worship.
are hostile to our own. Pray today for the church around the world and remem- THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
ber that the catholicity of the church enriches our study and worship. Psalms 80–84
Romans 9:1–10:4
for His views. Christ speaks “for the then command to give a writing of
record” on several issues that have divorcement, and to put her away?”
surfaced many times in Christian (v. 7). Christ answers that Moses
history and on which Christians never commanded anyone to put
have often disagreed. away his wife, he only “suffered”
Christ is traveling “the coasts of this practice. Backing the letter of
Judaea” (19:1) where another band Moses’ law, Christ insists that the
of Pharisees decides to put Him to only just cause for divorce is fornica-
the test, asking Him to weigh in on tion or “uncleanness” (Deut. 24:1),
the controversial practice of men that is, some form of sexual sin.
divorcing (“putting away”) their Christ’s view of marriage and
wives “for every cause.” In an age of divorce shocks even the disciples.
no-fault divorce, we can guess what They respond, “If the case of a man
the Pharisees had in mind (v. 3). be so with his wife, it is good not
Christ insists that the marriage to marry” (Matt. 19:10). They were
bond is intended by God to be probably thinking Jesus’ restrictions
monogamous and permanent. “What on divorce would limit too severely a
therefore God hath joined together, man’s freedom in marriage.
let not man put asunder” (v. 6), He Instead of refuting their words,
says firmly. Christ invites the disciples to con-
The Pharisees respond with sider the possibility of remaining
an objection they are sure can- unmarried so they can devote them-
not be overruled: “Why did Moses selves to the service of God more
T here is much similarity between the English term for the assembly of God’s
people and the terms for the same concept in other languages. Church in
English, kirke in Dutch, and kirche in German all sound alike and are even, in
some ways, spelled alike with the hard k or ch sound at the beginning and the
r in the middle. The reason for this is that all of these words find their origin in
kuriake, which is itself Greek in origin.
Literally, kuriake means “belonging to the Lord” and is a derivation of the
Greek word for “Lord,” kurios. It makes perfect sense that English would look to
kuriake as the root for the word church because, after all, what is the church if it
is not that group of people who belong to the Lord Jesus Christ?
Kurios in the Greek language can also refer to the master of slaves or ser-
vants. This explains Paul’s emphasis in today’s passage and elsewhere that he
is a “servant” of the Lord. If Christians, the kuriake, belong to a master, then
we are the servants or slaves of that master. To be known as servants or slaves
of Christ is not to imply that our master is cruel; by no means could Jesus ever
mistreat us. Instead, we are the Lord’s possession because He has purchased
us from slavery to sin and death and thus also from the righteous wrath of God
(1 Cor. 7:23). As such, He is worthy of our total allegiance.
Understanding that all followers of Christ are possessions of the Lord has
important implications for how we treat other Christians. To do wrong to
another believer is to do wrong to one of Jesus’ own beloved. Lest we miss the
point, to mistreat another Christian is to mistreat Christ Himself. All believers
are so closely united to Jesus that to treat people in the church poorly is to dis-
honor the Lord of the church (Acts 9:4).
Therefore, we should be known as those who are kind to others in the body
of Christ. We must exercise that love that overlooks a multitude of “minor”
sins (1 Peter 4:8). As servants together in the kingdom of God we must be ever
conscious that He takes our treatment of His people seriously; thus, we must do
good to them just as we would do good to Him.
a vocation given to you by God? Do you esteem yourself above others? Strive THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
always to serve the Lord in humility and with a true love for other believers. Psalms 94–95
Romans 12
12
1 CORINTHIANS 11:17–34 “In the same way also he took the cup, after
supper, saying,‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this,
as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me’” (v. 25).
T oday we conclude our study on the church by noting that there are many
different bodies that call themselves churches, whether or not they are
true manifestations of the church of Jesus Christ. How then can we tell when a
church in name is also a church in reality?
Faced with this same problem, the Reformers and Roman Catholics
answered this question very differently. Rome has said that the bishop is the
mark of the church, that is, the true church is present when you have a duly
consecrated bishop who is part of a line of succession going back to the apostles.
Ultimately, a bishop is a true bishop only if he submits to the pope; thus, in
Roman Catholicism only Roman Catholic parishes constitute the true church.
Protestants recognize the biblical failings of this view and, in studying
Scripture, traditionally define a true church according to two criteria:
1. The Word — there is no true church without the right proclamation of the
Word of God. In other words, a group that denies any of the essential truths
of the Christian faith is not a church. The essential truths of Christianity are
clearly taught in Scripture, and the Nicene Creed is one document that help-
fully summarizes them. A truth like justification by faith alone is included in
this list even though it is not specifically mentioned in the creed, because Paul
lists it as a defining mark of the Gospel (Gal. 1:6–9; 2:15–16), and it is a necessary
deduction from the creed’s emphasis on salvation through Christ alone.
2. The Sacraments — a true church rightly celebrates the Lord’s Supper and
baptism. That is, the sacraments must be conducted in line with Scripture’s
clear teaching, and we must allow for latitude where such things are not so
plain. For example, the biblical instruction on the mode of baptism is not as
clear as we might like; thus, we cannot anathematize those who disagree with
us in this specific area. Celebrating the sacraments correctly also involves
keeping unrepentant sinners from partaking in these means of grace (church
discipline). Though inseparably linked to the sacraments, sometimes we make
special mention of church discipline as the third mark of the church (1 Cor. 5).
T hough He has made a few excursions into Gentile areas (Matt. 8:28–34;
15:21–39), Jesus’ roughly three years of public ministry have thus far been
confined mostly to the region of Galilee (4:12–25; 9:1–7; 10:5–42; 17:24–27). But
we see now that He has left Galilee for Judea (19:1–2), the place where His time
among His disciples will conclude with His death, resurrection, and ascension.
Upon arriving in Judea, Jesus meets some Pharisees who, as we have
come to expect (12:1–14; 15:1–20), seek to test Him once more. Now the issue
is divorce, and the Pharisees’ question (19:3) is rooted in the controversy over
marriage in their day. First-century Jews interpreted Deuteronomy 24:1–4,
which allows for divorce on the grounds of “indecency,” in two major ways.
Rabbi Hillel and his students understood “indecency” liberally, allowing a
husband to divorce his wife for anything not up to snuff, even the quality of
her cooking. More conservative were Rabbi Shammai and his disciples. They
generally read the divorce-permitting ground of “indecency” as lewd sexual
behavior. Even so, Shammai allowed those who divorced for other reasons to
remarry. For reasons of their own, the Pharisees want to know whose view
Jesus prefers.
However, the starting point for a marriage discussion cannot be the argu-
ment as to what constitutes lawful grounds for divorce. As Christ teaches, we
must look first to God’s original intent for marriage: a lifelong bond between
one man and one woman (Matt. 19:4–6; see Gen. 2:24). The rabbinic debate
was concerned primarily with how one may exit the marriage covenant. Both
schools agreed that the old covenant law made a provision for divorce. Yet they
differed as to what the provisions were. Divorce is permitted due to the fall,
something the Father graciously allows in cases when sin has grievously shat-
tered the union of husband and wife (v. 8). God permits divorce in select cir-
cumstances to help us endure some effects of sin and the broken relationships
it produces. Had evil not entered the world, there would be no broken relation-
ships, and hence, no divorce.
MATTHEW 19:9 “I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for
sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery” (v. 9). 14
I t would be an understatement to say that sin makes a mess of things. The
earthly consequences of our selfishness can haunt us for the rest of our lives
and bring untold ruin upon our friends and families. Innumerable people have
been destroyed through their own evil choices or the wickedness of others.
Because of the way sin complicates life, we are sometimes forced to make
choices that we would not have to make in a perfect world. The decision to get
a divorce is one such example. Divorce is a sad event, something that may be
necessary when sinners reject God’s command for marriage to be a lifelong
covenant between one man and one woman (Matt. 19:1–8). Our Creator allows
divorce in certain circumstances, because in this fallen world gross sin often
destroys the trust upon which the foundation of marriage is established.
Today’s passage, which allows for divorce and remarriage in the case of
“sexual immorality,” is one case in which God makes a concession to fallen
human beings that acknowledges the difficulty and complexity of life in this
present age. As our study of Matthew 5:32 noted, the Greek word for “sexual
immorality” in 19:9 is porneia, which can include sexual sins in addition to
intercourse between a married person and someone who is not his spouse.
Knowing that porneia has this wider meaning is important because issues of
sexual infidelity can be extremely complex and provide just grounds for divorce
even if no extramarital affair has occurred. However, we must see that Jesus is
not allowing divorce for just any occasion of sexual sin, regardless of its severity.
His exception clause is more restrictive than the marriage legislation of His
day. He recognizes how hard it is to live in this fallen world and gives those who
have been heinously offended an out, but He also draws boundaries between
what allows people to separate lawfully and what does not.
Jesus does not mandate divorce in these situations. Acts of porneia grossly
betray the one-flesh covenant (see Jer. 3:1) and permit the offended spouse to
divorce and remarry, but reconciliation is better still. More often than not, the
wisest action is to save the marriage, if the offended party is willing.
C hrist’s appeal to creation and His restrictions on the lawful grounds for
divorce (Matt. 19:1–9) rebuke any desire to find loopholes in the marriage
laws in order to escape unions that sinners find unfulfilling. Marriage is to be
cherished wholeheartedly, not to be dispensed with as we futilely attempt to find
“happiness” outside of God’s gracious law. Husbands and wives are called to obey
the Lord together and work tirelessly to become one flesh physically, emotionally,
and spiritually by guarding and renewing their relationship (Gen. 2:24–25).
As seen in today’s passage, the disciples misunderstand the inherent worthi-
ness of holy matrimony, believing marriage to be appealing only if liberal provi-
sion is made for divorce and remarriage. When they say, “If such is the case…it
is better not to marry” (Matt. 19:10), they really mean, “If these words are true,
Jesus, we are better off unmarried than to find ourselves in a dissatisfying mar-
riage that does not meet your criteria for a just divorce.”
Christ does not deny the truth of this response entirely, confirming that
singleness can be desirable (vv. 11–12). However, He disagrees with His follow-
ers that the potential for imperfect marriages makes singleness a better alterna-
tive. Instead, singleness is preferable only when those who have been given the
gift of celibacy exercise this gift for the kingdom. Marriage, Jesus implies, is the
norm for most of God’s people and is not in itself inferior to lifelong singleness.
Singleness is better than marriage only for those to whom God has given the gift
of celibacy (1 Cor. 7). Thus, as John Calvin wrote, “God gives [the gift of single-
ness and celibacy] to whom he chooses…it is folly in any man to choose to live
unmarried, when he has not received this special gift.”
All marriages in this fallen world have bad days, but we should not discour-
age marriage or seek divorce frivolously. Marriage offers kingdom opportuni-
ties, like the discipleship of children, that are generally unavailable to single
people. At the same time, single people can more easily do kingdom work in for-
eign lands or other tasks that keep them away from home. Neither marriage nor
singleness are inherently superior; both vocations can serve the Lord.
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
Christian Ethics
BY R . C . S P RO U L
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
This
is book is a guide to Christian ethics th
that
hat
helps believers apply biblical principles to
several of the toughest problems believers must
deal with in the modern world. Issues such
as abortion, euthanasia, environmentalism,
war, and many others are examined in light of
Scripture, providing a framework within which
believers can consider these topics in a manner
pleasing to God.
EVA03BP Z PAPERBACK, 359 PAGES Z (REG. $18) $14.40
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
NEW Humility
H
Huu mi
mili
i li
lity
ty
BY C.J. MAHANEY
Humility
Huumility is an essential element of a life
pleasing
i to God,
G d andd this
hi book
b k explores
l what
h
it means to be humble according to Scripture.
It is a great tool for learning how to live the
Christian life more faithfully.
HUM01BH Z HDCVR, 174 PAGES Z (REG. $13) $10.40
NEW
NEW
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
the case with the parable of the labor- We readily understand this principle
ers in the vineyard (Matt. 20:1–16). in the context of our salvation. We
Because of the chapter division at the know Paul’s words: “For by grace you
end of Matthew 19, we fail to under- have been saved through faith. …not
stand the parable in its context of as a result of works, so that no one
Jesus’ teaching in 19:16–30. may boast” (Eph. 2:8–9), but many
Because that section of Matthew believers assume that we earn God’s
has already been treated in another blessings by our works — apart from
article, we will not look at it now, God’s grace.
except to observe that the occasion The parable of the laborers in the
of the parable is Peter’s question in vineyard, however, teaches us that
Matthew 19:27: “See, we have left not only our salvation, but also our
everything and followed you. What entire Christian lives are to be lived
then will we have?” Like many of us on the basis of God’s grace. Then the
today, Peter thought he related to parable also teaches us about two
God on the basis of merit, and he was amazing qualities of grace: the abun-
already adding up his merit points. dant generosity of His grace, and His
The parable is part of Jesus’ reply sovereignty in dispensing it.
to Peter, which begins in chapter 19, Consider first the abundant gener-
verse 28. The message of the parable osity of His grace. The master hired
can be summarized in this statement: laborers for his vineyard first at 6 a.m.,
The operative principle in the king- then periodically throughout the day.
dom of heaven is not merit but grace. Finally, he hired some at 5 p.m. to
18
MATTHEW 19:13–15
and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.’
And he laid his hands on them and went away” (vv. 14–15).
C
“ hildren should be seen and not heard” is a popular expression that can
evidence any one of several different attitudes toward youngsters. Some
would repeat this phrase because they believe children are too simple to offer
any meaningful contribution to our society. Others say it because they expect
children to be mini-adults — to stand still and quietly under any and all circum-
stances. Some adults believe that kids should be seen and not heard because, for
whatever reason, they just cannot stand to be around children.
None of these attitudes is appropriate for the Christian. This truth, however,
was not always well-understood among God’s people. In today’s passage, when
several people, presumably parents, try to bring their children to Jesus for a
blessing, the disciples attempt to turn them away (Matt. 19:13). We do not know
why the Twelve forbid the parents from coming forward; they may just feel that
the Master has better things to do than to spend His time with these little ones.
Even though Jewish culture prized children, the disciples’ attitude is not unusual
since young people also had a fairly insignificant role in first-century society. Still,
parents commonly sought out respected rabbis to bless their children, and the
disciples, knowing the custom, should not have been so quick to cast them aside.
Our Savior’s response indicates that children are anything but outsiders to
the kingdom. Once again He uses them as an object lesson, telling His follow-
ers the kingdom of heaven belongs to them (v. 14) and that salvation belongs to
those who become like children. Of course, Christ is not teaching anything sig-
nificant about an “age of accountability”; rather, He means that only those who
possess childlike qualities like absolute dependence and simple trust can turn
from their sin and rest upon Him alone (18:1–6; John 15:5; Gal. 2:15–16).
Jesus’ words also demand that Christians treat children well. If Christ will
not turn them away, how can we? Unfortunately, if we are not careful, we can
steer children away from Jesus either through programs that separate them
from corporate worship and the preached Word of God, or by just assuming our
children are believers and not taking the time to disciple them.
M atthew 19:16–22 describes Jesus’ meeting with the man we call “the rich
young ruler” (Luke 18:18 says he was a “ruler,” probably a synagogue offi-
cial). This story is well-known, but it has not always been applied correctly.
Before encountering Christ, the man has evidently done some soul-search-
ing, since he wants to know what will give him eternal life (Matt. 19:16). Later
on, the rich young ruler admits to following the commandments (v. 20), and so
his question reveals that he is looking for assurance beyond God’s revealed will.
Our Lord knows the man is looking for more, but He starts with the law of God,
for the Law is where salvation begins. Jesus reminds the man that His Father
defines goodness and that obeying Him is the way to eternal life (vv. 17–19).
Jesus is not teaching that we are able to obey God perfectly and merit
redemption. John Calvin writes that “the keeping of the law is righteousness, by
which any man who kept the law perfectly — if there were such a man — would
obtain life for himself. But as we are all destitute of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23),
nothing but cursing will be found in the law; and nothing remains for us but to
betake ourselves to the undeserved gift of righteousness.” Only in trying to keep
the Law will we see our failure and need of Christ, who flawlessly kept God’s
law in our place (Rom. 5:20–21; 2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 5:2–5).
The man cannot verbalize this truth, but he knows of his failure to obey the
Almighty’s rule. After all, he asks Jesus what more is required of him (Matt.
19:20). Of course, Jesus’ reply agrees with what Paul explains, namely, that fol-
lowing Christ is the only way to be saved (Rom. 10:13–14). For the ruler, follow-
ing Jesus requires him to give away all his belongings (Matt. 19:21).
Wealth does not interfere with everyone’s discipleship (Gen. 13:2; Luke
8:1–3), and not everyone needs to sell all his possessions. Nor are the poor inevi-
tably “better Christians” than the wealthy. Yet riches stood between this man
and Christ; thus, he had to surrender his money. Likewise, we all must abandon
idols (14:25–33; 1 John 5:21). Will we cling to that which keeps us from full com-
mitment to Jesus, or will we surrender all that we have to the Lord?
perpetually careful that our standard of living is not our idol. What comforts THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
would Jesus have you surrender for the sake of His kingdom? Psalms 113–115
1 Corinthians 3
B ecause in the Old Testament many of the old covenant saints are depicted
as wealthy (Gen. 13:2; Job 42:10–17), and since it often links prosperity with
God-pleasing behavior (Ps. 1; Prov. 22:4), first-century Jews commonly believed
that riches were a sign of righteousness. To have wealth, they thought, is to be
favored by God, signifying that a person has a share in the kingdom of heaven.
To be sure, personal righteousness and wealth are sometimes directly
linked. In a capitalistic society, honest businessmen often prosper because their
trustworthiness encourages many others to do business with them. Knowing
this to be generally true, the biblical wisdom literature links wealth and holi-
ness. But Scripture does not say rich people are always righteous (James 5:1–6),
and we can by no means link goodness with wealth in every case.
Yet our Savior’s disciples have bought into the assumption that the wealthy
deserve the kingdom. This is seen in their response to Jesus’ teaching on the
stumbling block of riches in salvation (Matt. 19:23–24). In today’s passage, the
disciples are astonished at Christ’s words, wondering aloud how anyone can be
saved (v. 25). In essence they are saying this: “But Jesus, if rich people cannot
find the salvation they obviously deserve, what possible hope is there for the
rest of us, who show that we are undeserving by our lack of money?”
Though He could do so, Christ does not question His followers’ unsubstanti-
ated link between riches and salvation. Instead, He uses the opportunity to teach
them about His Father’s grace. Some wealthy people never find salvation because,
no matter how hard they try, they cannot stop worshiping their bank accounts.
But though this is impossible with men, it is possible with God (v. 26). Some rich
people like Abraham and David enter the kingdom, but only because the Lord,
who can do all things, has intervened on their behalf, as He does for all the elect.
Matthew 19:26 deals mainly with the ability of God’s grace to rescue those in
bondage to their wealth. In the light of the entire canon of Scripture, however,
we realize that were it not for this sovereign grace, no person would be saved
from the sin that has enslaved his soul (Eph. 2:8–10).
religious affiliation. It is therefore vital to constantly remind ourselves that none THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
of us would love and serve God apart from His grace. Psalm 119:49–104
1 Corinthians 5
True Greatness
B Y T O M A S C O L
A fter promising Peter a great reward for leaving everything behind to follow
Him (Matt. 19:27–30), Jesus tells the parable of the laborers in the vineyard
20:1–16). This lesson reminds Peter that even though kingdom servants will
receive a great prize, all such gain is entirely due to God’s sovereign grace.
Day laborers in the first-century Roman world typically gathered in the mar-
ketplace where they were hired first thing in the morning to assist in the harvest
for the standard wage of one denarius per day. It makes sense for Jesus to draw
upon these facts when He tells the story in today’s passage because parables are
based upon everyday life and the disciples would be familiar with the plight of
the day laborer. That the master hires workers right up to the end of the work-
day, however, is unusual. People typically worked from six a.m. to six p.m. and
the eleventh-hour hire would be made at around five o’clock (vv. 1–5). That no
one else has yet hired these workers implies that they are seen as unprofitable.
Only a gracious and compassionate master would employ them (vv. 6–7).
When the time comes to pay the workers (Lev. 19:13), those who served a
short time receive the same as those who labored for hours (Matt. 20:8–10). This
latter group of workers grumbles that they do not get more (vv. 11–12), but this
is entirely inappropriate. As Matthew Henry comments, “God is a debtor to no
man.” Our Lord has the sovereign right to do as He wills, says John Calvin, and
“men have no right to complain of the bounty of God, when he honors unworthy
persons by large rewards beyond what they deserve.” Though our Father’s favor
may fall disproportionately on those who to us seem to be the least deserving, no
one can accuse Him of giving less than what He has promised (Matt. 20:13–16).
This passage does not exhaust all there is to say about rewards, as we see in
Jesus’ teaching elsewhere (25:14–30). The point here is only that God, by grace
alone, makes all believers citizens of the kingdom regardless of their service
or fervor. None deserve His favor, and we must never think that He owes us a
reward, nor should we be resentful when those who have flouted His will most
visibly and heinously also find blessing “at the last minute” (Luke 15:11–32).
freely whomsoever He pleases, and bestows on those who are called whatever THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
rewards He thinks fit.” Psalms 126–129
1 Corinthians 8
M atthew’s gospel has thus far revealed the disciples’ failure to comprehend
the full import of Jesus’ passion predictions. Peter protested vigorously
our Savior’s need to die for His people (16:21–23). Soon after hearing of Christ’s
death a second time, the disciples argued about who was the greatest among
them, not who was most eager to suffer with the Messiah (17:22–18:6). By now
the Twelve should know better, but they are dense and display their ignorance
again immediately after Jesus predicts His death for the third time (20:17–19).
This time, James and John, brothers who are uniquely close to Christ (17:1;
26:36–37), are the ones who grossly misunderstand what kingdom greatness
really means. Their presumptuous request to sit on either side of Jesus in His
kingdom — to have preeminent honor (Ps. 110:1) — is in keeping with their
nature as “Sons of Thunder” (Mark 3:17), even though their mother speaks for
them (Matt. 20:20–21). That they miss the point of what it means to be exalted
before God is evident in our Lord’s reply when He tells them they do not know
what they are asking (v. 22). Apparently, though it is futile to do so (10:38–39),
James and John are seeking glory without suffering, a crown without the cross.
John Calvin comments, “None will be a partaker of the life and the kingdom of
Christ who has not previously shared in his sufferings and death.”
James and John affirm their readiness to drink from the cup of Jesus (20:22),
which is rooted in a biblical metaphor for suffering, especially the pain that
comes from disobeying God (Jer. 25:15–29). To drink from Christ’s cup means to
share in His suffering, though not in precisely the same way, for only the God-
man can bear the Creator’s wrath against sin. Perhaps without knowing it at the
time, the sons of Zebedee confess their willingness to die for their Master.
At first this confession rings hollow (Matt. 26:47–56), but in time the broth-
ers, by the Spirit’s power, will freely suffer for Christ — James as a martyr (Acts
12:1–3) and John as an exile (Rev. 1:9). They start out arrogant and ignorant
but finally learn, Matthew Henry says, that “religion, if it is worth anything, is
worth everything; but it is worth little, if it is not worth suffering for.”
do not ask for grace to bear the cross in our way to it.” Are you asking for grace THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
to withstand suffering as you ask for God’s kingdom to advance? Psalms 134–137
1 Cor. 10:1–22
C hrist began His final trip to Jerusalem after Peter’s great confession (Matt.
16:13–23). In all likelihood, He traveled mostly along the eastern bank of the
Jordan River as He and His disciples moved southward from Caesarea Philippi.
This was a common route for Galilean pilgrims in His day, and the crowds that
we have read about during this trip are those Jews who, while traveling to
Jerusalem for the Passover, have seen the deeds of Jesus and are hoping that He
is the Messiah (17:14–18; 19:1–2). These men and women are among those who
will hail our Savior’s triumphal entry into the Holy City (21:1–11).
Today’s passage indicates that Jesus will soon arrive in Jerusalem to com-
plete His messianic work, for He has been in Jericho, located fifteen miles or
so from the Holy City, about a day’s journey in first-century Judea. Leaving
Jericho, Christ and His followers begin the ascent 3,000 feet up to Jerusalem,
but they do not get very far before meeting two desperate men in need. These
blind men, one of whom is named Bartimaeus (Mark 10:46), beg Jesus to heal
them, confessing Him as the “Son of David” (Matt. 20:30), a title loaded with
messianic assumptions. Knowing that the Messiah is present gives them hope
that He will fulfill His call to work miracles and give them sight (see Isa. 35).
Yet the crowd is displeased with these blind men, rebuking them as they cry
out to Jesus (Matt. 20:31). They probably feel the beggars are unworthy of the
Messiah’s attention since many first-century Jews thought blindness was God’s
punishment for sin (John 9:1–3). It is also likely that they do not want Jesus to
“waste His time” on these blind men. Those who believe Jesus might be the
Christ would be looking for Him to enter Jerusalem immediately so that He
might overthrow the Romans and set Israel over the world.
For Jesus, however, it is not a waste of time to pause and heal the blind men,
so moved is He by compassion (Matt. 20:32–34). This healing is against the peo-
ple’s idea of what the Messiah should do, and it portends stronger opposition to
come. The crowd that now does not want Him to help a fellow Israelite will later
call for Jesus’ head when He does not live up to their expectations (27:15–23).
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
Golden Booklet
of the True Christian Life
B Y J O H N C A LV I N
NEW
Heart
H
Hear
e ar
a t Af
Afla
Aflame
lame
me
e
B Y J O H N C A LV I N
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
What Is the Christian Worldview? worldview impacts science, art, economics, and
BOOK BY P H I L I P G R A H A M RY K E N several other areas of the culture.
CHR09CC Z 6 CDS Z (REG. $45) $36
NEW As we are bombarded
CHR09UO Z OUTLINE Z (REG. $3) $2.40
the culture around
by th
us, it can be difficult
to think
th according Worldviews in Conflict
to the Christian TEAC HING SER I ES BY R .C . S P RO U L
worldview.
world This handy
booklet summarizes
book For those who are unfamiliar with
the basics
b of the the importance of worldview thinking,
Christian
Chris worldview Worldviews in Conflict provides a basic
and develops
d the introduction to ideas such as hedonism,
implications of creation,
impli pragmatism, and secular humanism.
fall, rredemption, and WOR01CC Z 2 CDS Z (REG. $17) $13.60
glory in our everyday lives.
PAGES Z (REG. $5) $4
WHA12BP Z PAPERBACK, 48 PAG Lifeviews
BOOK BY R .C . S P RO U L
Battle for Our Minds This book is a helpful summary of the major,
TEAC HING SERI ES B Y R .C . S P RO U L atheistic competitors to the Christian worldview.
Battle for Our Minds is a brief overview of It also looks at the distinctive understanding
the history of Western thought, explaining Christianity brings to human society.
how the West has moved from the classical LIF02BP Z PAPERBACK, 220 PAGES Z (REG. $15) $12
worldview through the Enlightenment to the
postmodernism of today.
Tearing Down Strongholds
BAT01CC Z 2 CDS Z (REG. $17) $13.60
TEAC HING SER I ES B Y R .C . S P R O U L J R .
BAT01U Z STUDY GUIDE Z (REG. $4) $3.20
Tea
Tearing Down
Strongholds is a
Stro
Christian Worldview penetrating critique of
pen
TEAC HING SERI ES B Y R .C . S P RO U L relativism, pragmatism,
rela
Several different atheistic worldviews had a behaviorism, and other
beh
profound influence on twentieth-century thought influential philosophies
and many of these continue to shape our society that prepares us to
tha
even today. This series analyzes several of these deal with the unspoken
dea
worldviews, including secularism, humanism, assumptions of the
ass
and relativism, and looks at how the Christian non-believers around
non
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
us. Learn how to take every thought captive to helping us see the relevance of philosophy in
Christ with this helpful book and series. our own day.
TEA04CC Z 4 CDS Z (REG. $31) $24.80 CON01DC Z 12 DVDS Z (REG. $105) $84
TEA04BP Z PRBK, 197 PAGES Z (REG. $12) $9.60 CON01CC Z 12 CDS Z (REG. $74) $59.20
CON01BH Z HDCVR, 224 PAGES Z (REG. $20) $16
CON01U Z STUDY GUIDE Z (REG. $10) $8
A Blueprint for Thinking
TEAC HING SERI ES B Y R .C . S P RO U L
Ultimate Issues
Ult
This series examines the nature of truth
TEAC HING SER I ES
from a biblical perspective and provides
a foundation
f for B Y R .C . S P RO U L
explaining
exp where Ultimate Issues is
Ultim
our
ou knowledge designed to help
desig
comes
com from and the older
olde teens and
existence
exi of a reality young adults grapple
youn
beyond
be the physical with the Christian
world.
wo worldview and make
worl
BLU01CC Z 3 CDS Z ((REG. $$24)) $
$19.20 decisions based on
decis
BLU01U Z STUDY GUIDE Z (REG. $5) $4 the revelation of God in the BBible.
ULT01DC Z 2 DVDS Z (REG. $20) $16
ULT01CC Z 2 CDS Z (REG. $17) $13.60
The Consequences of Ideas
ULT01BP Z PRBK, 88 PAGES Z (REG. $9) $7.20
TEAC HING SERI ES BY R .C . S P RO U L
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
Be P repa red
B Y P H I L I P G . R Y K E N
T h is We Be l ieve
B Y C A R L R . T R U E M A N
Resolved
B Y S T E V E N J . L A W S O N
Whatever
attever Happened
Hap
H appe
pene
ned
d to Hell?
BY JOHN BLANCHARD
In a day
d and age when professing Christians
deny the reality of eternal, conscious punishment
for unrepentant sinners, this book defends the
existence of hell and deals with many of the
pastoral issues raised by the doctrine.
NEW Available for a limited time.
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
NEW
Foundations of Grace
B Y S T E V E N J . L AW S O N
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
What’s So Great
About the Doctrines of Grace?
by Richard D. Phillips
This book looks at the beauty and power of the doctrines of grace,
otherwise known as the Five Points of Calvinism. As this work demonstrates,
the doctrines of grace are not examples of idle theological reflection;
rather, they are profound truths that transform our lives and
motivate us to live for the glory of God.
WHA14BH Z HARDCOVER, 111 PAGES Z (REG. $15) $12
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
Tabletalk ministering to
those who minister
T abletalk magazine is issued faith-
fully every month in the hope that,
among other things, it will encour-
study guide since our book bags never
made it from the States. I decided to
give Tabletalk to myself as an early
age readers to ponder the truths of Christmas present.
God when they lie down, when they
Q: How do you use Tabletalk? Do you
rise up, and, yes, even when they
have a section you read most or first?
fly. Missionary pilot Glenn Grubb
recently wrote to share how he relies A: I go through the daily devotional
on Tabletalk magazine for renewal and readings, but I really enjoy the lon-
encouragement. ger articles. Dr. Derek Thomas’ article
R A L LY P O I N T T O W H I C H I C A N C A R R Y D I F F I C U LT Q U E S -
T I O NS W H E N I T RY TO R ECO N C I LE W H AT I SE E H A PPE N I N G
A RO U N D M E W I T H W H AT I K N OW IS T RU E I N SC R I P T U R E .