Chartered Engineer Application: March 2016
Chartered Engineer Application: March 2016
net/publication/341025303
CITATIONS READS
0 3,800
1 author:
Andrew Naylor
Liverpool John Moores University
31 PUBLICATIONS 127 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Andrew Naylor on 29 April 2020.
ENGINEER
1 Birdcage Walk
Westminster
APPLICATION
London SW1H 9JJ
8 0 1 5 7 5 0 5 Address
Address STEPHENSON BUILDING, CLAREMONT ROAD,
166 ANG MO KIO AVENUE 8, #07-01, NYP STAFF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE
APPARTMENTS Country UNITED KINGDOM
Country SINGAPORE Post code N E 1 7 R U
Post code 5 6 9 8 2 3
Email
Email [email protected]
[email protected] Work phone
Home phone Mobile phone +65 69086076
+65 91356902
Other qualifications
Please give details of all qualifications gained before your degree (eg National Diplomas, HNC)
Your personal data is stored on our membership database and treated with the highest confidentiality
in line with current data protection legislation. For more information visit www.imeche.org/privacypolicy
A list of my published work (including a breakdown of my citation metadata) can be found by visiting
my google scholar profile: http://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=_VY9ZAgAAAAJ&hl=en
I, the undersigned, certify the information provided here is true, and do hereby agree that in the event of my election
I will be governed during my membership by the Royal Charter and By-Laws of IMechE, as they are now formed or
as they may hereafter be altered, and that I will not use any titles, abbreviated titles or descriptions associated with
IMechE except those to which I am entitled under the By-Laws.
I further understand that I will pay an annual subscription as prescribed in the By-Laws, and if at any time I shall desire
to withdraw from the Institution, I will forthwith pay all arrears of subscription or other payments due from me.
Signature Date
Sub-competencies A1: How have you maintained and extended a sound theoretical approach to the application of technology in
engineering practice?
This is a potential
You could reference your ability to: Identify the limits of own personal knowledge and skills / Strive to extend own
framework you could technological capability / Broaden and deepen own knowledge base through new applications and techniques
use to demonstrate how A2: How have you used a sound evidence-based approach to problem solving, and contributed to continuous
you’ve met the competence improvement?
objectives. You could reference your ability to: Establish users’ requirements for improvement / Use market intelligence and
knowledge of technological developments to promote and improve the effectiveness of engineering products, systems
You don’t necessarily need and services / Contribute to the evaluation and development of continuous improvement systems / Apply knowledge
and experience to investigate and solve problems arising during engineering tasks and implement corrective action
to address every point, but
they should help to focus
your answer.
The sub-competencies are
based on the requirements
specified in the UK-SPEC.
EXAMPLE
A1: How have you maintained and extended a sound theoretical approach to enabling the introduction and
exploitation of new and advancing technology and other relevant developments?
ou could reference your ability to: Identify the limits of own personal knowledge and skills / Strive to extend own
Y
technological capability / Broaden and deepen own knowledge base through research and experimentation
A2: How have you engaged in the creative and innovative development of engineering technology and continuous
improvement systems?
ou could reference your ability to: Establish users’ needs / Assess marketing needs and contribute to marketing
Y
strategies / Identify constraints and exploit opportunities for development and transfer of technology within own
chosen field / Promote new applications when appropriate / Secure the necessary intellectual property rights /
Develop and evaluate continuous improvements systems
I regularly exploit findings from existing sources to provide rational for my day to day work. I
typically use scientific databases such as: Science Direct; Scopus; and PubMed to find and
review literature in a systematic manner. I first used this approach in 2009 when I commenced
my PhD research in collaboration with SNA Europe. I initially evaluated some of the most
fundamental studies related to wood machining to ascertain the general cutting mechanics of
wood-working tools. I then focused on recent research conducted specifically on wood sawing.
This revealed the fact that no substantial studies had ever been conducted on hand-saw tooth
geometries and provided the justification for my novel research. This is the subject of a
peer-review journal article that I have authored entitled ‘A review of wood machining literature
with a special focus on sawing’. I continued to use this method with my biomedical engineering
research at Newcastle University: I have recently been compiling meta-data from a series of
clinical trials regarding pyrolytic-carbon finger prostheses. The clinical trial data exhibits very
mixed results for these types of prosthesis and hence justified the need for wear testing which
I conducted in a lab based environment. I have utilised other data extraction methods in my
current role, such as the submission for freedom of information requests to the FDA.
Prior to starting my role at Newcastle I had no experience analysing surfaces, and I did not
have a full appreciation of the parameters that I should be measuring. To bring myself up to
speed I read journal articles published by colleagues within my department. Invariably only one
parameter was used by my peers to quantify the bearing surfaces of joint prostheses: 3D
average roughness (Sa) nm; the arithmetic mean of all peaks and valleys along the surface.
When looking at the topographical measurements that I had taken (for finger prostheses) I
noticed that there were surface phenomena such as scratches and pits that were not being
quantified by Sa. To address this I used British Standards Online to access relevant standards
associated with surface texture (namely BS EN ISO 25178-2). As a result of this investigation I
found two additional parameters: Skewness (Ssk); and Kurtosis (Sku), measures of surface
amplitude and pitch respectively. Through further review of scientific literature I found that
surfaces with low negative Ssk values combined with high Sku values yielded superior wear
characteristics. This is because these types of surfaces have a high proportion of deep sharp
valleys which act as reservoirs for lubricant. I have written a peer reviewed journal article on
this topic entitled “Evaluating the surface topography of pyrolytic carbon finger prostheses
through measurement of various roughness parameters”, which is currently in review. It is now
standard practice within my research group to measure Ssk and Sku along with Sa when
analysing prosthesis bearing surfaces.
B2: How have you conducted appropriate research and undertaken design and development of engineering solutions?
ou could reference your ability to: Identify and agree research methodologies / Assemble the necessary resources
Y
/ Carry out the necessary tests / Collect, analyse and evaluate the relevant data / Draft, present and agree design
recommendations, taking account of cost, quality, safety, reliability, appearance, fitness for purpose, environmental
impact / Undertake engineering design
B3: How have you implemented design solutions and evaluated their effectiveness?
ou could reference your ability to: Ensure that the application of the design results in the appropriate practical outcome
Y
/ Implement design solutions, taking account of critical constraints / Determine the criteria for evaluating the design
solution / Evaluate the outcome against the original specification / Actively learn from feedback on results to improve
future design solutions and build best practice
As part of my doctoral research I developed a numerical model to predict the cutting force
during wood machining. I performed flexural and shear testing on multiple wood species to
build a database of mechanical properties including: modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of
elasticity (MOE), shear strength (τ), shear modulus (G), toughness in bending (Ub) and
toughness in shear (Us). I then performed a series of cutting tests on the same wood species
using typical rip tooth geometry. I measured the forces in the direction of cutting; the feed
direction (thrust force) and the lateral direction (side force) using a calibrated tri-axial
dynamometer. As the thrust and side forces were exceedingly low, I used the cutting force as
the only measured response in the model with the mechanical properties acting as categorical
predictors. This model has demonstrated that: MOR and Ub are the most accurate categorical
predictors for cutting forces across the wood grain; and τ and Us most accurate categorical
predictors for cutting forces along the grain. I have documented this work in a peer review
journal article entitled ‘A Predictive Model for the Cutting Force in Wood Machining Developed
Using Mechanical Properties’, which has been highly cited by other authors in my field.
During my time at British Engines I continued to use complex analytical methods. As part of
the design team I helped optimize the design of a hydraulic motor. My role was to develop a
minimalist crankcase for the motor to reduce the overall cost of the casting. The original
crankcase was designed in the 1970’s and incorporated many ribs increasing the geometrical
complexity of the casting. It was thought that these ribs provided structural support when the
motor crankcase was subjected to high internal pressures, although this was not based on any
scientific deductions. My first task was to develop a solid model of the crankcase using 3D CAD
software with much thinner wall thickness and the ribs removed. I then applied FEA using von
Mises yield criteria. I incrementally increased the thickness of the wall until a factor of safety
(F.O.S) of 1.5 was achieved (F.O.S taken as yield stress / operating stress). It was universally
agreed within the department to order a prototype casting, which was subsequently
machine-finished and assembled into an existing motor arrangement. My second task was to
collect empirical stress data to validate the FEA results. This involved mounting strain gauge
rosettes onto the crank case at various points and using data acquisition software to calculate
the stresses at these points. There was very little discrepancy between the theoretical (FEA)
and measured (Strain gauge) results, justifying the decision to put the new design into
production.
C2: How have you planned, budgeted, organised, directed and controlled tasks, people and resources?
You could reference your ability to: Set up appropriate management systems / Agree quality standards , programme and
budget within legal and statutory requirements / Organise and lead work teams, co-ordinating the lead work teams,
coordinating project activities / Ensure that variations from quality standards, programme and budgets are identified
and that corrective action is taken / Gather and evaluate feedback and recommend improvements
C3: How have you led teams and developed staff to meet changing technical and managerial needs?
You could reference your ability to: Agree objectives and work plans with teams and individuals / Identify teams and
individual needs and plan for their development / Lead and support team and individual development / Assess team
and individual performance and provide feedback
C4: How have you brought about continuous improvement through quality management?
ou could reference your ability to: Promote quality through the organisation and its customer and supplier networks /
Y
Develop and maintain operations to meet quality standards / Direct project evaluation and propose recommendations
for improvement
I lead two taught modules on the Mechanical Design and Manufacturing degree programme: Concurrent Design and
Manufacture; and Operations & Production Management. Although I deliver the bulk of the teaching, I also manage
the workload of five lecturers from other institutions employed on an adjunct basis. These lecturers are primarily
employed to supervise student projects although some are involved in teaching, both of which I am responsible for
coordinating. The students finish their studies at BEng (Hons) level, at which stage they partially satisfy the
educational requirement for CEng. I make my students aware of documentation such as the engineering councils
UK-SPEC. Furthermore, I have invited Members and Fellows of the IMechE to give professional seminars to my
students, emphasising the additional educational requirements for CEng.
To maintain an industrial focus I work closely with external collaborators when putting together proposals for final
year student projects. I currently supervise a few projects collaboratively with Singapore Institute of Technology
(SIT), but the majority of my projects are conducted in collaboration with the manufacturer of bespoke medical
devices, Peacocks Medical Group Ltd. I negotiated match funding from Peacocks, with an agreed budget of S$5000
for group projects; and S$1500 for individual projects. This has provided the students with the means to purchase
more sophisticated equipment; and more consumables for their respective projects. To help my students manage
their projects I advocate the use of project planning software such as ‘MS project’ or ‘Mind View’ to construct their
Gantt charts. This is so they can formulate and schedule attainable goals throughout the duration of their projects.
It is very useful to highlight deadlines, submissions and delivery dates for any hardware required for their project
work. I adhere to the engineering council’s guidance on the accreditation of higher education programs when
considering the initial project brief, through to final assessment.
When conducting my own project work, I personally operate in a different way to that of my students. I create a
draft Gantt chart for each ongoing project (typically using MS excel) and I transcribe this information to my outlook
calendar. This method was how I was able to complete the ‘Crankcase’ design and ‘finger joint’ projects detailed in
section B ahead of schedule. For each instance: I made my outlook calendar visible to personnel involved in the
project and I encouraged them to make their calendars visible to me. This near eliminated scheduling conflicts, and
ensured that labour and resources where locked down at strategic points on the timeline. It also provided everyone
with daily reminders of important tasks/deliverables without the need for arduous micro-management.
In my role at Newcastle I was the bursar of a £17,000 fund (from September 2014 to September 2015) allocated
for hand and upper limb orthopaedic research, allocated by Wrightington hospital Lancashire. I primarily used this
fund to cover the costs attributed to my main area of research (wear testing and analysis of artificial finger joints).
At this moment in time I am considering grant opportunities form other funding bodies to continue the research
conducted by myself, my colleagues and prospective research students. These will include (but won’t be limited to):
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; British Society for Surgery of the Hand; Orthopaedic
Research (ORUK); and Arthritis Research (ARUK).
D1: How have you communicated in English with others at all levels?
ou could reference your ability to: Contribute to, chair and record meetings and discussions / Prepare letters,
Y
documents and reports on complex matters / Exchange information and provide advice to technical and non-technical
colleagues.
E2: How have you managed and applied safe systems of work?
ou could reference your ability to: Identify and take responsibility for own obligations for health, safety and welfare
Y
issues / Ensure the systems satisfy health, safety and welfare requirements / Develop and implement appropriate
hazard identification and risk management systems / Manage, evaluate and improve these systems
E3: How have you undertaken engineering activities in a way that contributes to sustainable development?
You could reference your ability to: Operate and act responsibly, taking into account the need to progress environmental,
social and economic outcomes simultaneously / Use imagination, creativity and innovation to provide products and
services which maintain and enhance the quality of the environment and community, and meet financial objectives /
Understand and secure stakeholder involvement in sustainable development
E4: How have you carried out continuing professional development (CPD) necessary to maintain and enhance
competence in own area of practice?
You could reference your ability to: Undertake reviews of own development needs / Prepare action plans to meet
personal and organisational objectives / Carry out planned (and unplanned) CPD activities / Maintain evidence of
competence development / Evaluate CPD outcome against action plans / Assist others with their own CPD
I am a very diligent individual in the laboratory and workshops. I am well acquainted with the Health and
Safety at Work act (1974), and the associated law concerning the control of substances hazardous to
health (COSHH). I have personally worked with bovine serum, a lubricant that is considered
‘bio-hazardous’. When working with bovine serum I wore the correct personal protective equipment. I
ensured that my research students carried out risk assessments prior to working in the laboratory or
workshops. I would not authorize them to conduct project work unless I was completely satisfied that
they had all of the correct personal protective equipment; and have considered all of the potential
hazards with an appropriate plan of action for each potential occurrence. I follow ‘environment agency’
guidelines on how to dispose of hazardous waste and I make other members of staff and students well
aware of such. This includes; the disposal chemical waste (formaldehyde) which has to be stored and
removed from the university by specialist contractors; and bio-hazardous waste which is prepared for
incineration. In Newcastle, all of the bio-hazardous waste was collected by 'Stericycle Inc' who incinerates
this kind of hazardous waste to power a CHP (combined heat and power) unit.
I understand the importance of regularly updating ones knowledge through engaging in CPD activities. I
have maintained a portfolio of all of my CPD activities, including a course entitled ‘Research and
Development Project Management’, delivered through the IMechE. I have completed the first 20 credits of
CASAP (Certificate in Advanced Studies in Academic Practice), a 60 credit masters level qualification.
Upon final completion I will be eligible to register professionally with the ‘Higher Education Academy’,
which I consider an important benchmark for anyone involved in teaching within a higher education
institution.
I am a registered STEM ambassador and I have volunteered for the IMechE’s ‘primary engineer’ scheme.
For this I made several visits to Thomas Walling primary school in Denton, Newcastle. I helped the lead
teacher develop a simple ‘design, make, test’ project for her year 4 pupils. This involved building and
subsequently drag racing small cars using cardboard, dowel rod and plywood wheels. It was a very
rewarding experience and a great opportunity to show young children that engineering is a skilled
profession that involves the right balance of scientific knowledge and practical know-how.
The purpose of the organisation chart is to help us understand the size and type of organisation for which you work,
and where your own personal accountability lies. This will give us a sense of the likely responsibility and authority
your role conveys and will help us frame questions for your interview.
If you are not part of an organisation, please fill out the fields below.
Please describe your direct clients Please describe who you report to
(e.g. Board, CEO, MD, Head of Engineering)
I have been invited to contribute towards a special issue on biomaterials for the open
access Journal “Lubricants”. I have started to prepare two manuscripts: a research
article; and a review article. In September 2016 I am scheduled to take the next 20
credits of the CASAP (HE teaching qualification).
I plan to utilize any extant industrial contacts to run high impact collaborative
schemes such as: Knowledge transfer partnerships (KTP); and EPSCR Industrial
CASE PhD studentships, with high quality engineering graduates. I also want to
continue my voluntary STEM work by engaging with the IMechE’s secondary
engineer scheme.
I understand that, by acting as sponsor, I will be supporting this applicant and thus recommending the applicant to
the Trustee Board as worthy of consideration for membership. Having read the By-Laws, I am of the opinion that this
applicant should be considered for election to the class indicated.
Mr Mrs Miss Ms Other: Mr Mrs Miss Ms Other:
First name First name
Surname Surname
IMechE Membership / EC number (if applicable) IMechE Membership / EC number (if applicable)
Address Address
Country Country
Class and Institution (eg CEng MIMechE, if applicable) Class and Institution (eg CEng MIMechE, if applicable)
Email Email
Signature Signature
Date Date