Chapter1-Chapter6 Isp640
Chapter1-Chapter6 Isp640
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Fast Tracking
Starting the next phase of a project before approval is obtained
for the current phase
Can be used to reduce the project schedule
Can be risky and should only be done when the risk is
acceptable
Plan Project
Project Objectives
Resources
Controls
12
Figure 2.3 – PMBOK® Project Management
Process Groups
2. Planning
3. Executing
5. Closing
1. Start Project
2. Initiate Project
3. Direct Project
4. Control Stage
7. Close Project
2-16 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The PRINCE2® – Themes (guidelines to aid project
goal achievement)
PRINCE2® = Projects IN Controlled Environments
1. Business Case
2. Organization
3. Risk
4. Quality
5. Planning
6. Change
7. Progress
2-17 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The PRINCE2® – Principles (Universal guidance for all
projects)
PRINCE2® = Projects IN Controlled Environments
2. Product Focus
3. Lessons Learned
6. Manage by Exception
7. Accountability
2-18 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Figure 2.5 The Systems Development Life Cycle
Planning
Analysis
Design
Implementation
Maintenance and Support
Customer
Product
Project Team
Performance
Company has too much It may be an efficiency Why are inventory levels so
inventory on hand problem high?
Cost of maintaining current Management believes a new What are the current levels of
inventory is becoming information system will inventory?
prohibitive improve efficiency and
therefore lower inventory
levels
Chapter 3
Drives
Organizational
Strategy
Supports
mobility
Project’s
Organizational
Measurable
Supports Value
(MOV)
Potential Areas:
• Customer
• Strategic
• Financial
• Operational
• Social
Organizational Value:
• Better?
• Faster?
• Cheaper?
• Do More? (growth)
= $100,000
$20,000
= 5 years
Total $25.00
If you sell a golf putter for $30.00 and it costs $25.00 to make, you have a profit margin of
$5.00:
Return on Investment
= ($115,000 - $100,000)
$100,000
= 15%
Where:
I = Total Cost or Investment of the Project
r = discount rate
t = time period
3-27 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Developing the Business Case
Scoring models
provide a method for comparing alternatives or projects
based on a weighted score.
can combine both qualitative and quantitative criteria
weights and scores can be subjective
Things to keep in mind about financial and scoring models
Financial models can be biased toward the short run
Some criteria are reversed-scored
Past experience may help create a more realistic business
case.
30
Table 3.3 – Comparison of Project Alternatives
Advantages Disadvantages
Increased Flexibility Determining Authority
Breadth & Depth of & Responsibility
Knowledge & Poor Response Time
Experience Poor Integration
Less Duplication
Advantages Disadvantages
Clear Authority & Project Isolation
Responsibility Duplication of Effort
Improved “Projectitis”
Communication
High Level of
Integration
Advantages Disadvantages
High Level of Higher potential for
Integration conflict
Improved Team members may
Communication wonder “Who’s my
boss?”
Increased Project Focus
Poorer Response Time
EXAMPLE:
Situation: buyer nak buat banglo with 1M cost and fixed, with 1M you have
to fulfill the requirement yang buyer nak
Buyer or seller risk on the contract? Seller bc kalau ada masalah or delay
yang perlukan extra cost dia takleh tambah cost lagi sebab 1M dah fix
4-19 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Categories for Procurement-Type Contracts (2)
Cost-Reimbursable Contracts
Payment or reimbursement is made to the seller to cover the
seller’s actual direct costs (i.e., labor, materials, etc.) and
indirect costs (i.e., admin. salaries, rent, utilities, etc.)
May include incentives for meeting certain objectives or
penalties if those objectives are not met
Types incentives
Cost-Plus- Fee (CPF) or Cost-Plus-Percentage (CPPC) – harga
material naik, fee pun naik bc of percentage
Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) higher risk to seller, lower risk to buyer
Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF) Which one is the most risky? For
buyer to seller
26 PMBOK 2015;
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2015)
1. Define goals – business case
2. Planning – chap4
1. Procurement
2. Human Resource
3. Scope (integration)
• What is planning stage deliverable
• Project charter and project plan (project charter is summary of project plan)
3. Execute
4. Close
Scope –
defines the work boundaries and deliverables of the project so
what needs to get done, gets done – and only what needs to get
done, gets done.
is determined directly by the project’s MOV.
Defines all the work, activities, and deliverables that the project
team much provide for the project to achieve its MOV
Work Breakdown Structure – a project management tool
that provides a hierarchical structure that acts as a bridge, or link,
between the project’s scope and the detailed project plan that will
be created.
Relationship between scope, budget and schedule – If scope bertambah, budget and schedule
bertambah
kalau schedule sikt, scope banyak, kerja tak siap. And u need more budget if the scope is
bigger.
4. Ada 3 scope
5-9 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Scope
Project-Oriented Scope – requirement gathering (client
requirement), design (design requirement) , develop
(system)
Support the project management processes defined by the
Project Life Cycle (PLC) and the chosen project methodology.
Deliverable Structure Chart (Figure 5.4 – DSC) – a tool used
by the project manager and team.
Product-Oriented Scope – input (review), info review
Specific features and functionality of the application system
First cut of requirements definition
Use Case Diagram (Figure 5.5) – a system modeling tool used
for refining the scope boundary and defining what the system
must do.
Concerned with managing changes to the project’s scope and to ensure that
these changes are beneficial when they occur
Potential Issues:
Scope Grope – unable to define the scope
Scope Creep – creep menjalar, scope tak freeze and getting bigger, ada
banyak scope, scope jadi besar
Scope Leap – the scope change: e.g: bila tengah buat, tetibe totally
berubah
Procedures:
Scope Change Request Form (Figure 5.6) – if tak buat masa tracking and
audit jadi susah
Scope Change Request Log (Figure 5.7)
Estimation by guessing or just picking numbers out of the air is not the
best way to derive a project’s schedule and budget. Unfortunately,
many inexperienced project managers tend to guesstimate, or guess at
the estimates, because it is quick and easy.
Dari bawah naik atas. Cth: u ask opinion from team and
dia cakap boleh buat dalam 5 hari, 3 days and from semua
tu total jadi 5 bulan
Duration
Milestone
Activity Node
A (2) B (5) C (3)
Arrow shows
kena habis on
the same time
A B C E 40 days
10 Days 10 Days 10 Days 10 Days
D Critical activities
10 Days
A B C E 10 Project buffer
5 Days 5 Days 5 Days 5 Days Normal, 30 days
If buffer, 22.5 days
D
Buffers
5 Days 2.5 Days
22.5 days je
WBS
Direct Costs
The direct cost of labor or other resources
Indirect Costs
The cost for covering such things as rent, utilities, insurance, etc.
Sunk Costs
Costs incurred prior to the project, such as a project that has been
restarted after a failed attempt
Learning Curve – the cost of prototype – one off paid
Often have to “Build one and throw it away” to understand a problem
or a new technology
Prorated Costs –
The idea that there is a cost associated with using a resource
Reserves
Contingency funds to be used at the discretion of the project manager
32 PMBOK 2015;
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2015)