Terms: Project Monitoring and Controlling
Terms: Project Monitoring and Controlling
CHAPTER 4
PROJECT MONITORING AND
CONTROLLING
Terms
• Monitoring - Collecting, recording, and
reporting information concerning any and
all aspects of project performance
• Controlling - Uses the data supplied by
monitoring to bring actual performance
into compliance with the plan
• Evaluation - Judgments regarding the
quality and effectiveness of project
performance
10-2
1
3/19/21
10-3
Construct
Iden6fy factors/ monitoring criteria Collect
Report
items to monitor and informa6on informa6on
collec6ng process
3/19/21 13:16
2
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:16
TIME PERFROMANCE
3/19/21 13:16
3
3/19/21
10-7
10-8
4
3/19/21
10-9
10-10
5
3/19/21
Data Collection
• Once we know the data we want, we need
to decide how to collect it
• Should the data be collected after some
event?
• Should it be collected on a regular basis?
• Are there any special forms needed for
data collection?
10-11
Forms of Data
• Frequency counts
• Raw numbers
• Subjective numeric ratings
• Indicators
• Verbal measures
10-12
6
3/19/21
Data Repor6ng
• Analysis is used to transform data into informa6on
• A number of ques6ons come up:
– Should we use special forms?
– Should data be collected before/aVer milestones?
– Should 6me and cost data be collected at the same 6me?
Data Analysis
• Data analysis techniques
– Simple aggrega6on
• Averaging, for example
– FiZng sta6s6cal distribu6on func6ons to the data
– Curve fiZng
• Significant differences from the plan should be
flagged
7
3/19/21
10-15
10-16
8
3/19/21
Report Types
1. Rou6ne
– Status, progress, and forecast reports
2. Excep6on
– A report used for special decisions or unexpected
situa6ons where affected team members need to be
made aware, and the change itself documented
3. Special analysis
– The results of a special study which documents a
par6cular opportunity or problem within the project
itself
9
3/19/21
Report Types
• Routine - Reports that are issued on a regular
basis or each time the project reaches a
milestone
• Exception - Reports that are generated when
an usual condition occurs or as an
informational vehicle when an unusual decision
is made
• Special Analysis - Reports that result from
studies commissioned to look into unexpected
problems
10-20
10
3/19/21
Meetings
• Reports do not have to be written
• They can be delivered verbally in meetings
• Projects have too many meetings
• The trick is to keep them to as few as
possible
10-21
Meeting Rules
• Use meetings to make group decisions
• Start and end on time and have an
agenda
• Do your homework before the meeting
• Take minutes
• Avoid attributing remarks to individuals in
minutes
• Avoid overly formal rules of procedure
• 10-22Call meeting for serious problems
11
3/19/21
10-23
24
12
3/19/21
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 total
Design 6 2
Engineer 4 8 8 8
Install 4 20 6
Test 2 6 4 2
Total 6 6 8 12 28 8 6 4 2
Cumul. 6 12 20 32 60 68 74 78 80 80
Time vs Cost
Figure 13.3 Project S-Curves
25
Drawback:
• Really behind schedule?
• Reasons for nega6ve variance?
• Good or bad?
• Reac6ve or proac6ve data?
Figure 13.3 Project Sierra’s S-Curve Showing Negative Variance
26
13
3/19/21
Some benefits:
1. Signal comple%on of important steps
2. Mo%vate team and suppliers
3. Offer reevalua%on points (client needs and any poten6al change requests)
4. Help coordinate schedules (delivery dates of project key components with
vendors, suppliers,...)
5. Iden%fy key review gates (midterm project review, periodic evalua6on,
comple6on of a series of project steps,...)
6. Signal other team members when their par6cipa6on begins (other
personnel to be available for involvement)
7. Delineate deliverables, work packages (to refocus efforts and resources
toward deliverables in trouble)
27
Benefit:
• The simpliest & most widely
used
• As a project performance
metric
• Clarity
Drawback:
• A reac6ve control system
14
3/19/21
Figure 13.6 Assessing Project Blue’s Status Using tracking Gantt Chart
29
Benefit:
• Stage of comple6on of
each task
• Measure both possi6ve
& nega6ve devia6on
• Easy to understand
• Update quickly, real-
6me project control
• Which task is ahead of,
on and behind
schedule
15
3/19/21
Drawback:
• Sources of problem (of
task or schedule
slippage)?
• Future projec6on?
• Es6mate 6me to
comple6on in case
significant nega6ve or
possi6ve vs baseline?
03
16
3/19/21
Figure 13.8 Monitoring Project Performance Figure 13.9 Monitoring Project Performance
(S-Curve Analysis) (Control Charting)
17
3/19/21
Earned Value
• The earned value (EV) of a task or project is the
budgeted cost of the work actually done
– It is calculated by mul6plying the budgeted cost of the task
by the percentage comple6on of the task
– Process is more difficult than it sounds
• Budgeted cost of a task is clear
• Percentage of comple6on is not
• The percent of a task’s budget actually spent is not
good indicator of percent comple6on
36
18
3/19/21
Variances
• Cost/Spending variance
– Earned value (EV) – actual cost (AC)
• Schedule variance
– Earned value (EV) – planned cost/value (PV)
• CPI (cost performance index)
– Earned value (EV)/actual cost (AC)
• SPI (schedule performance index)
– Earned value (EV)/planned cost/value (PV)
19
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
Total the
Create usage actual costs
Clearly define schedules of doing each Calculate both
each activity for activities task (AC) the budget
including its and resources Develop a variance (CV)
resource time-phased and schedule
needs and budget (PV) variance (SV)
budget 04
02
03 05
01
40
20
3/19/21
Exercise 1
68
51
21
3/19/21
EVA Chart
3/19/21 13:17
22
3/19/21
Exercise 2
• Work on a project was expected to cost
$1,500
• Workers were originally scheduled to finish
today
• However, as of today…
– Actually spent $1,350
– About 2/3 finsished
23
3/19/21
Time Analysis
CV = EV – AC
CV: Cost Variance - Độ chênh lệch chi phí
EV – Earned Value: Giá trị thu được (Budgeted cost of
work performed – Chi phí theo kế hoạch cho công việc
đã hoàn thành)
AC: Actual Cost of work performed – Chi phí thực tế của
công việc đã hoàn thành
CV(%)= CV/EV
CV (%): Tỷ lệ % chênh lệch chi phí
CPI = EV/AC
CPI: Cost Performance Index – Chỉ số chi phí thực hiện
3/19/21 13:30
24
3/19/21
Ví dụ
• Một gói công việc dự kiến hoàn thành trong
10 ngày liên tục với tổng chi phí 5000 USD.
• Thực tế đã 6ến hành gói công việc trong 8
ngày, đã hoàn thành 60% công việc với chi phí
2500 USD
• Câu hỏi: Phân ‰ch chi phí thực hiện gói công
việc
3/19/21 13:30
3/19/21 13:30
25
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:30
Ví dụ
• Một gói công việc dự kiến hoàn thành trong
10 ngày liên tục với tổng chi phí 5000 USD.
• Thực tế đã 6ến hành gói công việc trong 8
ngày, đã hoàn thành 60% công việc với chi phí
2500 USD
• Câu hỏi: Phân ‰ch chi phí và 6ến độ thực hiện
gói công việc
3/19/21 13:30
26
3/19/21
Indices
• Cost Performance Index
CPI = EV/AC
• Schedule Performance Index
SPI = EV/PV
• Time Performance Index
TPI = ST/AT
• Cost Schedule Index
CSI = EV2/(AC)(PV)
10-53
3/19/21 13:39
27
3/19/21
Exercise 2
• Work on a project was expected to cost
$1,500
• Workers were originally scheduled to finish
today
• However, as of today…
– Actually spent $1,350
– About 2/3 finsished
28
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
3/19/21 13:17
29
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
30
3/19/21
61
62
31
3/19/21
63
10-64
32
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
33
3/19/21
67
PRORJECT CONTROL
68
34
3/19/21
Project Control
• Control, the act of reducing differences between the
plan and actuality
• It is the final element in the planning-monitoring-
controlling cycle
• It is to no avail if ac6ons are not taken when reality
deviates significantly from what was planned
• Control is a difficult task
– It involves human behavior
– Problems are rarely clear cut so the need for change and
redirec6on is also fuzzy
Purposes of Control
1. Stewardship of organiza6onal assets
– Physical asset control
– Human resources management
– Financial control through the use of accoun6ng tools
2. Regula6on of results through the altera6on of
ac6vi6es
– This step involves taking ac6on when reality deviates
from plan
– It includes both mechanis6c and human elements
35
3/19/21
36
3/19/21
Common Mistakes
• Emphasizing short-run results at the expense of long-
run objec6ves
• Excessive control directed to specific objec6ves can
result in sacrificing other project objec6ves
• Across-the-board cuts in resource alloca6ons tend to
reward those who have already overspent or over
hired while penalizing the frugal and efficient
• Focusing on certain items for control can distract the
aŒen6on of team members from other, equally
important items
11-74
37
3/19/21
Cybernetic Control
• A system that is constantly monitored
• When a deviation is spotted, corrective
action is taken
• Cybernetic controls are not common in
projects
• Negative feedback loop
11-75
11-76
38
3/19/21
11-77
Go/No-go Controls
• Testing to see if some preset condition has
been met
• Most of project management is go/no-go
controls
• Use cannot be based on the calendar
– Some will take place at milestones
– Some will take place when work packages are
completed
– Others will be on-going
11-78
39
3/19/21
11-79
Phase-Gated Processes
• Controls the project at various points
throughout its life cycle
• Most commonly used for new product/
service development projects
• Project must pass gate to continue funding
11-80
40
3/19/21
Postcontrol
• These are controls that are applied after
the fact
• Their purpose is to mainly improve the
performance on future projects
• Often times, a final report is prepared
comparing the plan with reality
• Sometimes called “lessons learned”
11-81
11-82
41
3/19/21
11-83
• Flexible • Accurate
• Cost effective • Simple
• Useful • Easy to maintain
• Ethical • Fully documented
• Timely
11-84
42
3/19/21
• Control Chart
• Benchmarking
Trend Projec6on
Figure 7-5
43
3/19/21
11-87
11-88
44
3/19/21
11-89
Table 7-3
45
3/19/21
Cri6cal ra6os
CR = (AP/SP) * (BC/AC)
– CR: Cri6cal Ra6o
– AP: Actual Progress (AT)
– SP: Scheduled Progress (ST)
– BC: Budgeted Cost (EV)
– AC: Actual Cost
• BC/AC = CPI
• AP/SP = SPI or TPI
3/19/21 13:17
Ví dụ
• Một gói công việc dự kiến hoàn thành trong
10 ngày liên tục với tổng chi phí 5000 USD.
• Thực tế đã 6ến hành gói công việc trong 8
ngày, đã hoàn thành 60% công việc với chi phí
2500 USD
• Câu hỏi: CR?
3/19/21 13:17
46
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
3/19/21 13:17
47
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
3/19/21 13:17
48
3/19/21
3/19/21 13:17
3/19/21 13:17
49
3/19/21
50
3/19/21
Benchmarking
• making comparisons to “best in class”
practices across organizations
11-101
11-102
51
3/19/21
52
3/19/21
Human Factors in
Project Evalua6on & Control
v Project coordination and relations among stakeholders
53
3/19/21
108
54