Improving Fault Ride-Through Capability of DFIG-Based Wind Turbine Using Superconducting Fault Current Limiter
Improving Fault Ride-Through Capability of DFIG-Based Wind Turbine Using Superconducting Fault Current Limiter
Copyright (c) 2011 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing [email protected].
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> 2LPS-07 < 2
Control system
Copyright (c) 2011 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing [email protected].
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> 2LPS-07 < 3
6 1.2
Ia
Ib 1.0
0.6
0
0.4 Without SFCL
-2 With SFCL
0.2
USA grid code
-4
0.0
1 2 3 4 5
-6
Time (sec)
1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Time (sec)
(a) Without SFCL 1.2
6 1.0
0.4
0
0.2
-2
0.0
-4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Time (sec)
-6
1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Fig. 3. Voltage-dip characteristics at the generator terminals
Time (sec)
connecting SFCL. SFCL limits the deviation of reactive power
(b) With SFCL
at the fault instant, and also limits the reactive power drawn
Fig. 2. Stator current behavior with and without SFCL
from the grid at fault clearance. This would enhance the
stability of the overall system.
B. Voltage Dip Characteristics
The evaluation of rms voltage in pu at the terminals of the 1.0
wind turbine generator is shown in Fig. 3. Without SFCL, it is 0.8
shown that the voltage is decreased to 0.12 pu during fault.
After adding the SFCL, the voltage dip is decreased, where the 0.6
Power (kW)
achieve various grid codes with increasing the current limiting -0.2
resistance as will be described later in this paper.
-0.4
C. Active and Reactive Power Behavior
-0.6
Fig. 4 shows the active and reactive power responses with
-0.8
and without connecting SFCL. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the Without SFCL
active power drops to approximately zero after fault without -1.0
With SFCL
connecting SFCL. So, the electromagnetic torque of DFIG is -1.2
reduced to zero and the rotor accelerates. After connecting 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
SFCL, the drop in the active power decreased, where it is Time (sec)
attained about 0.15 kW. In addition, the reactive power (b)
characteristics have been improved as shown in Fig. 4(b), after Fig. 4. Active and reactive power responses: (a) Active power response. (b)
Reactive power response
Copyright (c) 2011 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing [email protected].
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> 2LPS-07 < 4
1.0 0.30
0.0 0.20
Current (kA)
-0.5 0.15
-1.0 0.10
Without SFCL
-1.5 With SFCL 0.05
-2.0 0.00
1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Without 30 Ω 60 Ω 100 Ω
Time (sec)
RSFCL
Fig. 5. Change of rotor current under fault with and without SFCL
Fig. 7. Effect of SFCL resistance on voltage dip at the generator terminal
D. Rotor Current Behavior
in current limitation will be achieved as shown in Fig. 6. Three
Increased current in the rotor circuit is very harmful to the SFCL resistance values were considered and compared with
rotor side converter. It may exceed the rating of the converter zero limiting resistance. The difference among phases is
leading to failure of its components. In addition, the protection attributed to the different fault starting angles. Regarding
setting on rotor circuit is governed by current. This setting is voltage dip characteristics at the generator terminals, it was
responsible of blocking the rotor circuit and tripping the wind also improved for higher SFCL resistance values. The
turbine from the grid. minimum voltage level under fault attained 0.25 pu at a
Fig. 5 shows the change of rotor current under fault with and current limiting resistance of 100 Ω as shown in Fig. 7. This
without SFCL. After connecting SFCL at the stator circuit, the achieved the highest minimum voltage level required
rotor current is limited to about 0.9 kA by the effect of worldwide [14]. Accordingly, the wind turbine integrated with
magnetic coupling between rotor and stator, while this current a current limiting resistance of 100 Ω became complied with
was about 1.7 kA without SFCL. With adjusting the current various international grid codes.
limiting resistance to a proper value, the rotor currents can be
limited within their safety margins. This would prevent the IV. CONCLUSION
rotor side converter from disconnection from the generator
The utilization of superconducting fault current limiter
during faults and keep the wind turbine connected to the grid.
(SFCL) to improve fault ride-through capability of DFIG has
Consequently, fault ride-through capability will be improved.
been proposed. The DFIG model integrated with SFCL has
Moreover, with using SFCL, the rotor current after fault
been built using PSCAD/EMTDC software. With using SFCL,
clearance returns to its steady state value without any further
the stator currents have been limited effectively and the
oscillations.
minimum voltage level at the generator terminals has been
E. Effect of Current Limiting Resistance increased leading to compliance with international grid codes.
Several cases have been studied with varying the value of The reduction of stator current has been reflected on the rotor
the SFCL resistance in order to evaluate the effect of current currents due to the magnetic coupling. Rotor currents have
limiting resistance. Only the stator currents and the voltage dip been limited to about 50% of its value without SFCL. In
characteristics will be presented, since they are the main addition, the overall dynamics of DFIG, represented by active
motivations for other characteristics of DFIG. For stator and reactive power, has been improved. With increasing the
currents, with increasing SFCL resistance further enhancement current limiting resistance, further improvements in the
obtained characteristics have been achieved. The obtained
Without SFCL
results pointed out the effectiveness of using SFCL with
7 DFIG-based wind turbine.
With RSFCL = 30 Ω
6 With RSFCL = 60 Ω REFERENCES
5 With RSFCL = 100 Ω [1] J. Lopez, E. Gubia, E. Olea, J. Ruiz, and L. Marroyo, “Ride Through of
Wind Turbines with Doubly Fed Induction Generator under
Current (kA)
Symmetrical Voltage Dips,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, pp.
4
4246-4254, Oct. 2009.
[2] G. Pannell, D. J. Atkinson, and B. Zahawi, “Analytical Study of Grid-
3 Fault Response of Wind Turbine Doubly Fed Induction Generator,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 25, pp. 1081-1091, Dec. 2010.
2 [3] J. Morren and S. W. H. de Haan, “Ridethrough of Wind Turbines with
Doubly-Fed Induction Generator During a Voltage Dip,” IEEE Trans.
1 Energy Convers., vol. 20, pp. 435-441, Jun. 2005.
[4] V. F. Mendes, C. V. Sousa, S. R. Silva, B. C. Rabelo, and W. Hofmann,
0 “Modeling and Ride-Through Control of Doubly Fed Induction
Phase a Phase b Phase c Generators During Symmetrical Voltage Sags,” IEEE Trans. Energy
Fig. 6. Effect of SFCL resistance on stator currents Convers., vol. 26, pp. 1161-1171, Dec. 2011.
Copyright (c) 2011 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing [email protected].
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> 2LPS-07 < 5
[5] A. M. S. Yunus, M. A. S. Masoum, and A. Abu-Siada, “Application of [10] K. E. Okedu, S. M. Muyeen, R. Takahashi, and J. Tamura, “Wind Farms
SMES to Enhance the Dynamic Performance of DFIG During Voltage Fault Ride Through Using DFIG with New Protection Scheme,” IEEE
Sag and Swell,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 22, pp. 5702009, Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 3, pp. 242-254, Apr. 2012.
Aug. 2012. [11] B. Fox, D. Flynn, L. Bryans, N. Jenkins, D. Milborrow, M. O’Malley, R.
[6] L. G. Meegahapola, T. Littler, and D. Flynn, “Decoupled-DFIG Fault Watson, and O. Anaya-Lara, Wind Power Integration: Connection and
Ride-Through Strategy for Enhanced Stability Performance During Grid System Operational Aspects, The Institution of Engineering and
Faults,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 1, pp. 152-162, Oct. 2010. Technology, 2007.
[7] L. Yang, Z. Xu, J. Ostergaard, Z. Y. Dong, and K. P. Wong, “Advanced [12] K. Nam, C. Lee, D. K. Park, T. K. Ko, and B. Y. Seok, “Thermal and
Control Strategy of DFIG Wind Turbines for Power System Fault Ride Electrical Analysis of Coated Conductor Under AC Over-Current,”
Through,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, pp. 713-722, May 2012. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 17, pp. 1923-1926, Jun. 2007.
[8] D. Santos-Martin, J. L. Rodriguez-Amenedo, and S. Arnaltes, [13] S. M. Blair, C. D. Booth, and G. M. Burt, “Current-Time Characteristics
“Providing Ride-Through Capability to a Doubly Fed Induction of Resistive Superconducting Fault Current Limiters,” IEEE Trans.
Generator Under Unbalanced Voltage Dips,” IEEE Trans. Power Appl. Supercond., vol. 22, pp. 5600205, Apr. 2012.
Electron., vol. 24, pp. 1747-1757, Jul. 2009. [14] M. Tsili and S. Papathanassiou, “A review of grid code technical
[9] S. Foster, L. Xu, and B. Fox, “Coordinated Reactive Power Control for requirements for wind farms,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 3, pp.
Facilitating Fault Ride Through of Doubly Fed Induction Generator- and 308-332, Sep. 2009.
Fixed Speed Induction Generator-Based Wind Farms,” IET Renew.
Power Gener., vol. 4, pp. 128-138, Mar. 2010.
Copyright (c) 2011 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing [email protected].