0% found this document useful (0 votes)
137 views

Example Following Programming Problem Graphically.: Maximize

The document provides two examples of solving linear programming problems graphically. In the first example, the problem is to maximize z = 60x + 15y given the constraints x + y ≤ 50 and 3x + y ≤ 90. The feasible region is determined to be the polygon OABC within the non-negative quadrant. The optimal solution that maximizes z is point A, with values of x = 30 and y = 0. In the second example, the problem is to maximize profits from manufacturing two products given constraints on processing times on two machines. The optimal solution found is to produce 450 units of product B to maximize the objective function of z = 3x1 + 4x2.

Uploaded by

Karan Rawat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
137 views

Example Following Programming Problem Graphically.: Maximize

The document provides two examples of solving linear programming problems graphically. In the first example, the problem is to maximize z = 60x + 15y given the constraints x + y ≤ 50 and 3x + y ≤ 90. The feasible region is determined to be the polygon OABC within the non-negative quadrant. The optimal solution that maximizes z is point A, with values of x = 30 and y = 0. In the second example, the problem is to maximize profits from manufacturing two products given constraints on processing times on two machines. The optimal solution found is to produce 450 units of product B to maximize the objective function of z = 3x1 + 4x2.

Uploaded by

Karan Rawat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Linear Programming Graphical Methods-

Example 1. Solve the following linear programming problem graphically. 79


Maximize Z = 60x+15y

Subject to the Constraints x+y s 50

3x+y90
where x20 and y20
Solution :i) Objective function : Maximize z
60x +15y =

ii) Subject to the Constraints: x+yS 50;


3x+y s90
ii) Non negative constraints: x20 and y20
iv) Graph of the constraints:
Graph of x+y< 50: Convert the inequality into equation i.e. x +y= 50 and
transform into intercept form we get.

5 l , it means line meets the axes at (50,0) and (0,50). On joining these

points we get the line x + y 50. Now the points (0,0) satisfies the x+y< 50. There-
=

fore favourable region containing the origin.


Graph of 3x+ y s 90 Convert the inequality into equation i.e. 3x+y =90
and transform into intercept form we get.
=l it means line meets the axes at (30,0) and (0,90). On joining these
30 90
points we get the line 3x+y =90. Now the points (0,0) satisfies the 3x+y90.
Therefore favourable region containing the origin.

Y AxiSA

90
80 Scale
70 onr-axis: Tcm =
10 units

ony-axis: Icm =
10 units
50
40
30
B (20,30)
20

X' -Axis X-Axis


10 20 3d 40 500
Y- Axis
80
-Operations Research
fea-
given constraints is known
as
Feasible region The common region of all the
:

Sible region. Here which is polygon OABC.

Vi) Optimum solution: Optimum solution lies on any


one corner of the feasible region.
Remark
|Corner points of Value of objective function
z = 60 x + 15y
Feasible region|
O (0.0) 60(0) +15 (0) =0
A (30.0) 60 (30) + 15 (0) =1800(Max.
Intersection of x +y = 50 & 3x +y = 90|
B (20,30) = 60(20) + 15 (30) = 1650

C (0.50) 60 (0) 15(50) + =


750
The maximum value ofthe objective function occurs at the point (30,0). Hence
the optimum solution of the given L.P.P. is x= 30, y =0 and z (max) = 1800.

Example 2. A firm manufactures two products A and B which profit earned perunit is
on
Rs. 3 and Rs. 4 respectively. Each product is processed on two machines M, and M. The
product A requires I minute of processing time on M, and 2 minutes on M, B requires 1
minute on M, and 1 minutes on M,. Machine M, is available for not more than 7 hrs. 30
minutes, while machine M, is available for 10 hrs. during any working day. Find the
number of units of products A and B to be manufactured to get the maximum profit.
(M.C.A. 2010, 2009)
Solution: The Linear Programming Model of given problem is as follows
i) Objective function: Maximize z =3, +4x,

i) Subject to the Constraints t x 450 See Page no. 20


for Mathematical
2x, +x S600 Formulation
ii) Non negative constraints: x, 20 and x, 20
iv) Graph ofthe constraints: Here take x-axis for x, variable & y-axis for x, variable.
Graph of x, +x, $ 450: Convert the inequality into equation i.e. x +X, =450
and transform into intercept form we get.

460 450 = , it means line meets the axes at (450,0) and (0,450). On joining

these points we get the line x +x, =450. Now the points (0,0) satisfies the
x+ 450. Therefore favourable region containing the origin.
Graph of 2x, +x, S 600 Convert the inequality into equation i.e.

2x +X = 600 and transform into intercept form we get. + * = 1 it means line


300 600
Linear Programming Graphical Methods-
neets the
axes at
(300,0)
(30 and
(0,600). On 81
2x+2 = 600.Nov the points (0,0) stisfies joining
these points we get the line
the 2x, + S
region containing the origin. +x, 600 .Therefore favourable

Y Axis

Senle
6003 onx-uxis: I em 190) mits
vny-uxis: I cm

400-

300-
B(150, 300)
200-

100
X- Axis
450 X- Axis

100 200 300 400 500


s09
Y -Axiss

v) Feasible region: The


sible region. Here which is
common region of all the given constraints is known as fea-
polygon OABC.
vi) Optimum solution : Optimum solution
lies on any one corner of the feasible region.
Corner points of Value of objective function Remark
Feasible region z =
3x, +
4x,
O(0,0) z =3 (0) + 4 (0) = 0
A (300,0) z =3 (300) + 4 (0) =900
B (150,300)
Z =
3 (150) + 4 (300) 1650 =
Intersection of x,tx, =
450 &
2x,+x,= 600|
C(0,450) z =
3 (0) + 4 (450) 1800 (Max.
=

ne maximum value of the objective function occurs at the point (0,450).Hence


optimum solution of the given L.P.P. is x, = 0, x, =450 and z (max) = 1800. Thus the
firm
manufactured only 450 units of product B to get maximum profit.
Examnla1 0
Opera
ations Res
Linear
Progran esearch
ning Prob.
90 solve
the
following

to
Cxample 8. Use the graj Eraphical
method

lem

Maximize = 7x, + 3x.

Subject to constraints ,+21. 23


, + , S4

0sxs5/2
0 s x s3/2 and x.X 20
(M.B.A. 2009
= 7x +3x,
Solution : i) Objeetive function Maximise
4
i) Subject +2x, 23: x +*2
to
the Constraints: x,
as
ne
Tollowing constraints split into two inequalities
0Sx 3/2
0x,SS/2

0Sx,&x, s 5/2 OSx, &x, £ 3/2


as5/2 x, S3/2
and x 20 and x, 20 (Non-negative constraints)

i) Graph of the constraints: Here take r-axis forx, variable & y-axis for x, variable.
Graph of x, +2x, 23 Convert the inequality intoequation i.e. x +2x, =3

and transform into intercept form we get.+ 1, it means line meets the axes at
3/2
(3.0) and (0.3/2) on joining these points we get the line x +2x, =3. Now the points

23. Therefore favourable


(0.0) not satisfies the x, +2x, region does not containing the
origin opposite to origin.
i.e.
Graph of x, +x, 54 :Convert the inequality into equation i.e. x+X =4
= 4 and
and

transform into intercep! form we get. = 1 , it means line meets the axes at (4,0)

and (0.4) on joining these points we get Ihe ine x +x, = 4 . Now the points (0,0)

satisfies the x, +X, 4 . Theretore Iavourable region containing the igin.


Graph of x, s 5/2 : Convent into equation i.e. x, = 5/2 and draw the line parallel
s r i s Dassing through (5/2,0). X, S /2 shows lavourable region let side to the line.
Linear Programming Graphical Methods 91
Graph of x, 3 / 2 : Convert the inequality into cquation i.e. x; = 3/2 and draW

the line parallel to x-axis passing through (0,3/2). Inequality x,'s 3/2 represents favourable
region below the line.

Se:ule
Y-Axis
unit

,52

B $/2,3/2)

X-Axis

v Feasible region: The common region of all the given constraints is known as fea-
sibleregion. Here which is polygon ABC.
corner ofthe feasible region.
vi) Optimum solution: Optimum solution lies on any one
Remark
Corner points of Value of objective function
Feasible region z- 7x+ 3x,
Intersection of x, = 5/2, x+2x=3|
A (5/2,1/4) = (2.5,0.25) =7(2.5)+3(0.25)=18.25
B (5/2,3/2) = (2.5,1.5) z 7(2.5)+3(1.5)= 22 (Max.)| Intersection of s, 5/2&x=3/2
C 0,3/2) = (0,1.5) z=7(0)+3(1.s)=4.5
function occurs at the point (2.5, 1.5).
The maximum value of the objective
=22.
given L.P.P. is x, 2.5, x, 1.5 and z,(Max.)
= =

Hence the optimum solution of the


9. Solve the following L.P.P. by using graphical
method:
Example
z = 6x +7x
Minimize

Subject to the Constraints 2x+3x, 212


20
2x +x 28 and x,x

Solution: i) Objective function:


Maximize z =6x +7x,
28
ii) Subject to the Constraints 2x+3x, 212; 2x +r,
-Operations Researe
92
constraints : X,20
iii) Non negative y-axis for x, var
variable &
Here take r-axis for x,
iv) Graph of the
constraints: variabl
Graph of 2x, +3x, 212 : Convert the inequality into
ation i.e
equation

into intercept form we get.


2x+3x, =12 and transform
= 1 , it means line meets the axes at (6,0) and (0,4) on joining these pojn
nt
we get the line 2x,+3x, = 12. Now the points (0,0) not satisfies the 2x, +3x, >1 2
Therefore favourable region does not containing the origin i.e. opposite to origin.

Graph of 2x, +x, 28 Convert the inequality into equation 1.e. 2x, +x, »R

and transform into intercept form we get.

= 1 , it means line meets the axes at (4,0) and (0,8) on joining these
4 8
points we get the line 2x, +x7, =8. Now the points (0,0) not satisfies thee 2x, +x, 28
Therefore favourable region does not containing the origin i.e. opposite to origin.
Y-Axis A
Seale
m x-Axis: } unii I mnit

omy-uxis: I mit2units

X' - Axis
-Axis
Y- Axis
v) Feasible region : The common region of all the given constraints is known as fea
sible region. Which is unbounded and having three corners ABC.
vi) Optimum solution : Optimum solution lies on any one corner of the feasible
Corner points of
region
Value of objective function
Remark
Feasible region z 6x, + 7x
A(6,0) z =6 (6) +7 (0) =36
B (3,2) z 6 (3)
+7 (2) 32 =

(Min.)|Solve 2x,+ 3x,=12 & 2x,+ x, -8


C (0,8) z = 6 (0)+ 7 (8) = 56
The minimum value of the
objective function occurs at thepoint (3,2). Henco
the optimum solution of the given L.P.P. is x, 3, x, =
2 and
=
z
(Min.) 32.
=

You might also like