Running head: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 1
Same-Sex Marriage
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 2
Introduction
The start of civilization logged relationships between couples of the same sex normally
referred to as same-sex marriage. Same sex relationships take several forms depending on
complexity of interactions. Whether casual, unendorsed or ritual, same-sex marriages are a
subject of laws of the land for various states from time immemorial. Acceptance of same-sex has
faced opposition from devoted doctrines like Christianity. Consequently, same-sex marriages
have become a ritual taboo over the years. Same-sex marriages encompass moral issues touching
on rights of civilians. Recently, same-sex marriages are gaining acknowledgment across many
states in the world. Several laws are being formulated to protect the rights of same sex couples.
Depending on one’s sexuality or religion, same-sex marriages can be beneficial or adversarial.
Same-sex marriage is a contentious topic that has been streaming in and out of public
purview in recent years. Several countries lawfully permit people of same sex freedom to marry
(Bridgewater, 2013). The Netherlands, England, USA and Brazil formulate legislations
permitting same-sex marriages. Legalization of same-sex marriage is a contentious issue that
feasts across many institutions. Same-sex marriages draw responses from religious and non-
religious circles (Spilsbury, 2012). While gays and other human rights activists support
legalization of same-sex marriage, many people oppose such legalization. Whether to oppose or
support gay marriages depends on personal faith and perception of morals that pertain to
sexuality.
Proponents for legalization of gay marriages argue that there are benefits that accrue from
such marriages (Bridgewater, 2013). Since procreation requires two opposite sex, gay couples
customarily adopt children. Adoption of children is beneficial to moral society as well as
relevant authorities in reducing the number of orphans (Spilsbury, 2012). There are financial
rewards culminating from gay marriages. Acquisition of marriage licenses, payment of revenue
taxes and reduction of tax spending on public aid programs are part of financial rewards of same-
sex marriage. As a contradiction, many people tenably oppose legalizing gay marriages. Gay
marriages refute definition of morality of marriage as an institution (Corvino & Gallagher,
2012). These marriages violate the purity of tradition besides rescinding family morals. Muslims
and Catholics feel that gay marriages violate the beliefs of their respective faiths. However, some
human rights activists argue that there are two types of marriages; religious and civil marriages.
Marriage is not necessarily a religious abide but a contract that is enforceable by law.
Opinions differ among people regarding the upkeep of children by gay couples (Corvino
& Gallagher, 2012). While numerous people trust that children require fathers and mothers,
research conducted insinuates a different perception. A research by National Institute of Health
of United States reports that girls brought up without a father-figure risk early exposure to sexual
interactions (Bridgewater, 2013). Dr. Drexler contradicts such report with claims that children
bred in in same-sex marriages exhibit versatility, compassion and open-mindedness. Dr. Drexler
ascertains that child-care depends on standards of marital connections rather than edifice of
families.
Depending on one’s sexuality or religion, same-sex marriages can be beneficial or
adversarial. Couples of the same sex should be permitted to publicly proclaim their commitment
without prejudice. As long as gay marriages do not interfere with the beliefs of other people, gay
couples are accredited equal marriage rewards as their same-sex counterparts. Same-sex
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 3
marriages benefits budgets of states by contributing towards overall collection of tax.
Legalization of gay marriages heavily rely government programs that protect the civil rights of
couples.
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 4
References
Corvino, J., & Gallagher, M. (2012). Debating same-sex marriage. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Spilsbury, L. (2012). Same-sex marriage. New York: Rosen Central.
Bridgewater, R. (2013). Same-Sex Marriage in the United States: The Road to the Supreme
Court. Library Journal, 138(10), 126
Violette, R. J. (2004). Legalizing Gay Marriage (Book). Library Journal, 129(12), 101.
http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004857
