Technical Memo: 1.1 Parallel Pipes Connection
Technical Memo: 1.1 Parallel Pipes Connection
1. Introduction
1.1 Parallel pipes connection
For many application of fluid flow, the pipes - as the fluid flowing medium, have to be connected in
either series or parallel connection.
When two or more pipes are linked in such a way that the flow from one pipe branches or divides into
two or more distinct pipes before reuniting into a single pipe, the pipes are said to be in parallel
[ CITATION Red \l 1033 ]. Along the branch pipes, the total discharge Q is divided into components Q 1
and Q2, resulting in –
Q=Q1 +Q2
(1)
If f is the friction factor, L is the length of pipe, d is its diameter and g is acceleration due to gravity, the
relationship between head loss and flow rate is provided by Equation 2 (Darcy-Weisbach Equation).
h f =r Q2 (2)
32 fL
where , r=
g π 2d5
The Hardy cross method of balancing heads starts with an estimated assumption (Q 0) that ensures flow
continuity at each junction, then balances the flows until potential continuity is reached over each loop
in the pipe network. The iteration is continued until the change in flow calculated by Equation 3 is close
to zero.
−∑ r Q20
∆ Q= (3)
∑ 2r Q0
2. Problem definition
The problem involves evaluating the pipe network depicted in Figure 1, which spans two loops (I and II),
as well as the flow rate of water entering and exiting from four corners of these loops (A, C, D, and F), all
of which are made of similar construction materials. The temperature and pressure are assumed to
remain constant throughout the pipe network, the entire pipe assembly is at the same level, and the
pipe flow may be called steady state. The task is to analyze the flow rate in each pipe in order to fulfill
the external flows entering and exiting the network using the pipeline data provided in Table 1.
1 2000 18
2 900 24
3 2800 12
4 1100 24
5 2200 12
6 750 18
7 2600 24
3. Assumptions
Following assumptions were made during the evaluation of given pipe networks:
4. Calculation
We assume the friction factor to be 0.05. So, ‘r’ on each pipe can be calculated as shown below,
32 f L1 32 ×0.05 × 2000
r 1= 2 5
= =1.33
gπ d 18 5
1 2
32.174 × π ×( )
12
32 f L2 32 × 0.05× 900
r 2= 2 5
= =0.14
gπ d 24 5
2 2
32.174 × π ×( )
12
32 f L3 32 ×0.05 × 2800
r 3= 2 5
= =14.11
gπ d 12 5
3 2
32.174 × π ×( )
12
32 f L 4 32 ×0.05 ×1100
r4 = 2 5
= =0.17
gπ d 24 5
4 2
32.174 × π ×( )
12
32 f L5 32 ×0.05 × 2200
r 5= 2 5
= =11.08
gπ d 12 5
5 2
32.174 × π ×( )
12
Table 2. Iteration I
Loop I Loop II
∆ Q=0.937 ∆ Q=1.338
Since ∆ Q is positive, we need to add the change in flow for clockwise fluid flow and subtract from the
anti-clockwise fluid flow. So,
Q FE=3.198−0.937=2.261 Q ED=8.398−1.338=7.06
Q AF =8−0.937=7.063 Q DC =5.85−1.338=4.512
Table 3. Iteration II
Loop I Loop II
∆ Q=0.15 ∆ Q=−0.285
For positive∆ Q , we need to add the change in flow for clockwise fluid flow and subtract from the anti-
clockwise fluid flow and for negative ∆ Q , we need to do the opposite. So,
Q AB=6.937+0.15=7.08 7 Q BC =2.138−0.285=1.853
Loop I Loop II
∆ Q=0.0045 ∆ Q=−0.01
The change in flow is nearly equal to zero in both the loop. Hence, we can stop the iteration after
making the changes using the flow just obtained.
Q AB=7.087+ 0.0045=7.0915 Q BC =1.853−0. 01=1.84 3
5. Conclusion
The pipe networks as shown in Figure 1 was solved using Hardy cross method. This method is an
iterative method which tends to reduce the head loss in each loop to zero while maintaining the law of
continuity. The flow values in each pipe are obtained after the 3 rd iteration with ∆ Q value close to zero.
The flow through pipes AB, AF, FE, BE, ED, BC and DC are 7.0915 ft 3/s, 6.9085 ft3/s, 2.1065 ft3/s, 5.2485
ft3/s, 7.355 ft3/s, 1.843 ft3/s and 4.807 ft3/s respectively.
6. References
2021. Hardy Cross method. March 17. Accessed October 10, 2021.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hardy_Cross_method&oldid=1012679355.