USA V S Singh & K Singh Criminal Complaint & Affidavit
USA V S Singh & K Singh Criminal Complaint & Affidavit
1
AUSA: Filed 11/11/21 Telephone:
Julie A. Beck Page 1 of 7 550-9333
(313)
AO 91 (Rev. ) Criminal Complaint Agent: Edward A. LaVigne Telephone: (956) 231-8719
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
On or about the date(s) of November 11, 2021 in the county of Wayne in the
Eastern District of Michigan , the defendant(s) violated:
Code Section Offense Description
21 United States Code, Section 841(a)(1) Possession with intent to distribute controlled substances
Complainant’s signature
City and state: Detroit, Michigan Honorable Anthony P. Patti, US Magistrate Judge
Printed name and title
Case 2:21-mj-30536-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 11/11/21 Page 2 of 7
AFFIDAVIT
I, Edward La Vigne, being duly sworn, depose and state the following:
experience, and over ten years relating to border enforcement activities. During
participation, from discussions with other law enforcement officers and agents,
Group to refer the information. HSI Detroit Special Agent Edward (Ted) La
November 10, 2021. CBPOs stated the truck operated by K. SIINGH’ was
selected for random inspection after entering the outbound plaza of the Detroit
Ambassador bridge.
(driver) and K. SINGH (passenger). CBPO’s asked K. SINGH where they were
coming from and what they were transporting in the truck. K. SINGH
commercial trucking company they worked for, and they both (S. SINGH and
SINGH if they had had any firearms, narcotics, or U.S. currency over
Case 2:21-mj-30536-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 11/11/21 Page 4 of 7
question indicating they didn’t have any of the objects or materials inquired
about by CBPO’s.
6) At that time CBPO’s referred the truck for further inspection. S. SINGH parked
the truck, and both he and K. SINGH were asked to exit the vehicle so that
CBPO’s could conduct a full inspection of the vehicle’s cab. CBPO’s again
asked S. SINGH and K. SINGH if they had any firearms, narcotics, or U.S.
currency over $10,000, and again both responded they did not. CBPO’s have
authority to inspect commercial cargo entering and departing the United States.
CBPO’s entered the cab of the truck and began their inspection. During the
inspection CBPO’s lifted the bottom bunk in the sleeping area of the truck, and
“crystal” substance.
7) A CBPO K-9 handler and his K-9 were dispatched to the truck to conduct
further inspections. The K-9 was walked around the truck and indicated to the
presence of narcotics in the cab of the truck. The K-9 then entered the truck
and alerted to the presence of narcotics under the bunk bed in the truck’s cab.
The truck was then moved to a loading dock at the CBP facility where the white
“crystal” material was field tested and returned positive results for “d-
containing the white “crystal” material from under the bottom bunk in the
hydrochloride.”
Bridge and reviewed items seized by CBP Officers. This review disclosed
aware through prior investigations, that commercial truck drivers are actively
involved in smuggling methamphetamine from the U.S. into Canada and are
Miranda warnings from HSI Special Agents. S. SINGH affirmed his right to
Case 2:21-mj-30536-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 11/11/21 Page 6 of 7
counsel and questioning was ceased at that time. HSI SA’s as well as CBPO’s
observed at no time did S. SINGH ever ask why he was being detained, how
long he would be held, or any questions at all pertaining to his detention. This
behavior is extremely odd, as subjects detained for various reasons at the bridge
often inquire as to why they are being held, what they did wrong, and when
Miranda warnings from HSI Special Agents. K. SINGH affirmed his right to
counsel and questioning was ceased at that time. During the review of K.
uncontrollably, and his voice was quivering. K. SINGH also had a very
questionnaire. His mouth was very dry and he had a hard time speaking at
twenty years, this is behavior is common with individuals that are under
SINGH ever ask why he was being detained, how long he would be held, nor
did he ask any questions at all pertaining to his detention. This behavior is
extremely odd, as subjects detained for various reasons at the bridge often
Case 2:21-mj-30536-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 11/11/21 Page 7 of 7
inquire as to why they are being held, what they did wrong, and when they’ll be
free to leave.
11) SA La Vigne is aware that this criminal conduct occurred within the Eastern
District of Michigan and based upon my training and experience, the drug
12) Based on the foregoing, there is probable cause to believe that Sandeep
841(a)(1).
_________________________________
Special Agent Edward La Vigne
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Homeland Security Investigations
_______________________________________
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
United States Magistrate Judge