Historians use several techniques to authenticate historical documents:
1) They investigate materials for anachronisms to test if documents are genuine or forgeries.
2) Documents can become garbled over multiple copies removing them from the original, so historians collect various copies to compare and restore texts.
3) Identifying the author and date of a document is essential for external criticism to determine if facts are credible.
Historians use several techniques to authenticate historical documents:
1) They investigate materials for anachronisms to test if documents are genuine or forgeries.
2) Documents can become garbled over multiple copies removing them from the original, so historians collect various copies to compare and restore texts.
3) Identifying the author and date of a document is essential for external criticism to determine if facts are credible.
OF AUTHENTICITY, OR EXTERNAL CRITICISM” FORGED OR MISLEADING DOCUMENTS
✓Historical document s are fabricated or forged for
the following reasons namely (a) to bolster a false claim or title, (b) utilized as a political propaganda, (c) used as some practical joke, and (d) to mislead certain contemporaries and subsequent historians TEST OF AUTHENTICITY ✓To test a hoax from genuine document, the historian has to use tests that are common also in police and legal detection. ✓Historians investigate the materials to see whether they are not anachronistic. They examine the ink for signs of age or for anachronistic chemical composition. They also see if they can identify the handwriting, signature, seal, letterhead, or watermark of the document. GARBLED DOCUMENT
✓It is the result of deliberate effort to deceive
people. ✓Documents are garbled because they have to undergone several stages of reproduction removed from the original- that is to say, copies of copies and sometimes copies of translations of copies of translations of copies, and so on. THE RESTORATION OF TEXTS
✓Historians are committed to restore texts. Their first
task is to collect as many copies of the dubious text as diligent search will reveal. Then they are compared. When the style and content of passages under discussion may be attributed to the author, it is safe to assume that they were parts of his original manuscript but were committed by later copyist; and when they cannot be attributed to the author, it is safe to assume that they were not parts of his original manuscript. IDENTIFICATION OF AUTHOR AND DATE
✓Identification of the author and date is essential in
performing external criticism. ✓Historians need to determine the author’s location in time and space and as to his habits, attitudes, character, learning, associates, etc. ✓Identification of author matters in internal criticism. Even the most genuine of documents should be regarded as guilty of deceit until proven innocent. WHAT IS HISTORICAL FACT?
✓A historical fact thus may be defined as
particular derived directly or indirectly from historical documents and regarded as credible after careful testing in accordance with the canons of historical method. THE PERSONAL EQUATION
✓The ability and the willingness of a witness to give
dependable testimony are determined by a number of factors in his personality and social situation that together are sometimes called personal equation- a term applied to the correction required in astronomical observations to allow for the habitual inaccuracy of individual observers. ✓The personal equation of a historian is sometimes also called “his frame of reference”