Carve Out
Carve Out
modern carve-out
Six steps to greater value
04. Focus on the details with a team that knows the local market 17
In today’s low-growth environment, corporates are under At the same time, private equity investors are taking
pressure to improve returns. Add to this activist shareholders a greater interest in buying assets that they have to
and focused competition, and the pressure is unrelenting. carve out from the seller’s business. There is often fierce
competition for standalone assets, so investors are taking
It is no surprise, then, that many corporates are withdrawing
a more creative approach to building their portfolios.
from activities where their businesses are least profitable or
where there is no longer a strategic fit. Carve-outs can unlock For corporates, carve-outs can be the ideal way to pick up
value from these non-core enterprises. specific assets, such as IP or talent, that they cannot develop
themselves. Carve-outs can also enhance market share.
Number of carve-outs
200
Value of deals
180 $1B+
$100M-$1B
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
The seller fails to create competitive The timing may not be right, or the right information may not
tension in the sale process. be made available up front. The result is fewer bidders and lower
offers for the assets.
Suboptimal structures The price you get is inextricably linked to the tax structure you
lead to value leakage. adopt, whether you package the target in an appealing way for the
buyer, and whether you can flex the structure for different buyers.
Poor cash management leaves You need to be careful about leaving cash trapped in the
money on the table. business you want to sell. Cash is not an asset. Buyers often
discount cash that is trapped in a business. They are unwilling
to pay cash for cash.
Poor communication puts even It can be easy to underestimate the cost of not keeping
strong relationships at risk. major stakeholders well briefed. Competitors are usually
ready to step in, and reputational costs can mount up.
We acted for the buyer, a private equity house. Once our client became
the preferred bidder, the seller’s lack of planning became clear. We advised
our client to seek greater protection for carve-out risk in the sales and
purchase agreement.
like your buyer how other owners may value the asset differently.
Being able to package the asset with the flexibility to suit Call attention to intangible assets, such as IP,
both types of buyer can help you get the best price. It define them and assign them a value.
is usually helpful to extend this flexibility to transitional Retain top talent. Incentives might include
services agreements and cost analysis. bonuses that will be paid out after the deal is
done.
Buyers that have less work to do may Define ongoing supply or distribution networks.
be willing to pay more
Identify the transitional services the target will
The easier it is for buyers to visualize the asset and how it need immediately after closing.
would fit within their portfolio, the higher the price they
are usually willing to contemplate.
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
and protect it
The success of your bid will also depend on your You only get the synergies if you integrate
demonstrating to the seller that you will be able to effectively, but buyers sometimes fail to factor
complete the deal quickly. integration into their pricing.
It is therefore critical to focus on the most important For example, look at the footprint of the business
issues. Too many challenges or questions can erode the by country, and identify the integration support you
seller’s confidence. have to put in place.
Look at the continuity of revenue streams, for example, Buyers often hugely underestimate the
or where the most valuable IP is registered.
cost of post-acquisition integration.
Some buyers do not make the most of vendor
They often do not leverage their due
due diligence, and repeat much of the same
work again themselves. diligence and so waste efforts at the
Front-load the work you’ll have to do later anyway. integration stage.
Peter Strivens
Partner
deal structure
maximize value for you and the other party, whether
you are the buyer or the seller. It will also minimize
business disruption through the separation process.
The way in which this is done depends very much on the Any cash or distributable reserves may be subject to
existing tax structures of the buyer or the seller. foreign exchange controls in the context of a deal
across jurisdictions.
Decisions on the structure may also affect the deal
timetable, depending on any local rulings or registrations Local entities may be able to declare interim dividends.
that you need, and how long it takes to set those up. If not, there are other ways to repatriate cash.
This can present a problem. The logical way to separate, Today’s more robust tax structures
from an operations perspective, might not be the most
have to be defendable at a time
tax-efficient. Our recommendation is to try to preserve as
many of the target’s tax attributes as possible while still when laws are tougher – BEPS, for
working closely with the business to sketch this out. example – and where perceptions
judge companies more harshly.
James Smith
Partner
Financial information Consider local law Statutory processes, Manage cash to the
will usually have or tax issues when financial information lowest possible cash
to be prepared in making an inter- and reporting may balance.
advance. company loan. be needed.
Use cash to fund
In some jurisdictions, There may be This can be the carve-out or
there will be timing restrictions on sequenced with to capitalize the
restrictions on when borrowing under other steps, e.g. new entity.
an entity can declare the deal terms or on stock transfers.
Use letters of
a dividend. cross-border lending.
Third-party audit direction to position
There may be a lack If the loan cannot be reports may be cash in other
of distributable repaid, it could be required. jurisdictions.
reserves. repositioned within
Be aware of defined
the target group.
Interim dividends benefit pension
may be available. schemes.
Senior management can often see the opportunities to improve, especially when they are
incentivized through equity allocation or ratchets. They can make life-changing amounts of
money when the private equity investor exits.
The target’s management will sometimes get a say in the auction process. Our client engages
as soon as they can with senior management during the auction process, to understand their
vision for the business and build relationships with them. This can help them win the bid, even
if they may not be offering the highest price.
Sometimes assets do not look the same on the ground Sometimes global teams do not communicate well with
as they do on paper, so local due diligence is vital. local teams. They work from different fact patterns, or
information from different sources.
Sellers that collaborate with local management can
usually identify potential problems early, and this local To avoid a fiasco where teams end up working at cross-
knowledge helps set realistic close dates. purposes, we also recommend thinking about how two-
way communication can be most effective and what
If the buyer does not operate in that jurisdiction,
support is needed through the deal process.
you cannot always know when they will be ready.
Licenses and government approvals, for example,
can delay closing.
Number of jurisdictions
50+
1-4
Almost half (48%) of
all deals involve 10 or
more jurisdictions
25-49
5-9 10-24
Lots of plans calculate synergies, but do not look more Unions can be powerful in the EU. They often
widely at whether those assumptions are realistic. You share information. They have learned that they
should ask yourself whether the core concept works – can strengthen their negotiating positions by
with your people in mind. collaborating across borders.
Due diligence at early stages can validate the thinking Unions and employee representative bodies worry
behind the core drivers of the deal. Without this, the most when they see a private equity buyer. Such
deal plan could be based on false assumptions. buyers have a reputation - not always based on
reality - for harsh employment practices. Talks can be
combative from the start.
Once the deal terms have been agreed, you embark Serious churn can be avoided if you make a point to
on the final, most complex stage of the transaction: communicate openly and regularly with your major
implementation. This is not easy when you have customers and suppliers. Clear messages from within
engaged many teams of different advisers, when the business are always important, and most of this
the deal depends on thousands of lines of data, can be planned. But this is often a source of anxiety for
and when there are local variations for transitional in-house legal teams. Shared contracts and transitional
service agreements, approvals and contracts. service agreements might cover some important areas
There are countless opportunities for errors and of the business for the short term, but not for the long
misunderstandings. term. Keep in mind that suppliers react better if they
are kept informed before the deal is finalized.
Given the complexities of these transactions, For large-scale and multijurisdictional projects, an
planning and project management should not be an integrated project management team is very effective
afterthought. They create confidence early on, and – lawyers, accountants and other professional advisers
make integration considerably more successful. working alongside professional project managers.
Based on our experience, the organizations that These specialists piece together the puzzle. They
achieve the greatest success with their carve-out understand the deal issues and design reporting
transactions tend to place project management at the frameworks and escalation paths for hundreds of
center of their approach. different workstreams.
Jonathan Sharp
Senior Associate
This clear plan instilled confidence in bidders, allowed rapid due diligence
and sped up negotiation of the purchase agreement. It enabled our client to
identify tricky areas ahead of time and prevent problem jurisdictions from
delaying the closing.
Cross-border deals are often highly strategic and even For this study, we analyzed 1,160 carve-outs of at least
transformative for a company. They are significant and US$100 million in value (at that time), based on data
complex undertakings for any organization and require provided by Thomson Reuters.
experience and efficiency to maximize deal value.
The deals were either reported as intended, pending,
We are consistently ranked “No. 1” by legal directories, announced, partially completed or completed between
with more than 13,000 M&A lawyers in 77 offices 2009 and 2016. To ensure the deals reflect the subject
across 47 countries. of this study, we have included divestitures, spin-offs,
split-offs and equity carve-outs. We actively selected
Our global M&A team is fully integrated and works
deals that involve a transfer of units, department,
seamlessly across time zones, cultures and languages
division or business (up to 100%) from one seller to one
to get the deal done, manage risks and achieve desired
buyer. We have excluded property acquisitions, joint
synergies.
ventures, mergers, buy-backs, recapitalization and
We have deep experience in cross-border deals: more secondary buy-outs.
than 60 years investing in and refining our precedents
and processes to drive efficiency and provide the highest
quality standards and deal practices.
DISCLAIMER: The material in this report is designed to provide general information only. It is not offered as advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or
other, and it should not be taken as such. The precedent documents included in this report have not been prepared with any particular transaction in mind. Baker & McKenzie,
the editors and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done wholly or partly
in reliance upon the whole or part of the contents of this report. No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this report without
seeking specific professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC311297. A list of members’ names is open to inspection at
its registered office and principal place of business, 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA. Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss
Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the terminology commonly used in professional service organisations, reference to a “partner” means a
person who is a member, partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm.
Baker & McKenzie LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales. Further information regarding the regulatory position
together with our privacy policy is available at http://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/locations/emea/united-kingdom/london/legal-notice.
This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.