(Mouton Grammar Library 37) Knut J. Olawsky - A Grammar of Urarina-Mouton de Gruyter (2006)
(Mouton Grammar Library 37) Knut J. Olawsky - A Grammar of Urarina-Mouton de Gruyter (2006)
A Grammar of Urarina
Editors
Georg Bossong
Bernard Comrie
Matthew Dryer
Mouton de Gruyter
Berlin · New York
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
A Grammar of Urarina
by
Knut J. Olawsky
Mouton de Gruyter
Berlin · New York
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Mouton de Gruyter (formerly Mouton, The Hague)
is a Division of Walter de Gruyter G m b H & Co. KG, Berlin.
Olawsky, Knut J.
A grammar of Urarina / by Knut J. Olawsky.
p. cm. - (Mouton grammar library ; 37)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-3-11-019020-5 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN-10: 3-11-019020-6 (cloth : alk. paper)
1. Urarina language - Grammar. I. Title.
PM7226.053 2006
498-dc22
2006032102
ISBN-13: 978-3-11-019020-5
ISBN-10: 3-11-019020-6
ISSN 0933-7636
xv
Abbreviations
Map of Peru and Urarina territory
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Linguistic profile 1
1.2 Geographical location 2
1.3 Genetic affiliation 5
1.4 The current state of the language and its endangerment 10
1.5 Summary of social organisation 11
1.5.1 Means of subsistence 11
1.5.2 Material culture and daily life 12
1.5.3 Ceremonial life and spirituality 13
1.6 Database and language resources 16
1.7 Terminology and conventions 18
1.7.1 Transcription 18
1.7.2 Organisation of examples 23
1.8 Acknowledgements and personal notes 27
2 Phonology 30
2.1 Consonants 30
2.1.1 /t/ 32
2.1.2 Irl 33
2.1.3 /d/ 34
2.1.4 Ibl 35
2.1.5 Ik! 35
2.1.6 /kw/ 36
2.1.7 Is/ 37
2.1.8 /// 38
2.1.9 /tg/, [d3] 39
2.1.10 /h/ 40
2.1.11 /fw/, [hw] 42
2.1.12 /hj/ 44
2.1.13 /l/ 45
2.1.14 /n/ 46
2.1.15 /m/ 46
2.1.16 /jV 47
2.1.17 The status of [j] and [w] 48
2.2 Phonotactics 49
2.3 Vowels 51
2.4 Vowel length 55
2.5 Vowel sequences 58
2.6 Diphthongs 60
2.7 Nasalised vowels 63
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
vi Contents
References 935
Index 94 \
Abbreviations in interlinearisation
Urarina is an isolate spoken by less than 3,000 people in the area of the Rio
Chambira, Loreto Province, North-western Peru. The language exhibits a range
of unusual grammatical characteristics that are rarely or not at all found in other
languages.
One of the most remarkable properties of Urarina grammar is its pervasive
constituent order OVA/VS, which was classified as "non-existing" by
Greenberg (1963). At a later stage, a handful of Amazonian languages (mostly
from the Cariban family) were discovered which exhibit this constituent order
under certain conditions. However, Urarina probably represents the most
convincing example for this atypical syntactic structure, as is investigated in
§18.
Another feature unique to Urarina is the existence of a three-way distinction
for person marking on all verbs, as discussed in §11. Every verb can potentially
be person-marked according to three different paradigms. The choice of the
respective paradigm depends on a complex set of syntactic and pragmatic
conditions, which are investigated in detail. Among the relevant features for the
selection of the person inflection class are clause type and text genre, as is
further supported by statistical evidence.
Word classes, as described in §5 are a further point of particular interest.
Only few members of word classes other than nouns and verbs are underived or
represent homogeneous classes. Numerals, for instance, are split into native
ones, which are inflected as verbs, and loans from Quechua, which are
morphologically treated like nouns. In a similar way, there is no uniform class
of adjectives: again, most of them can be divided into special types of nouns
and verbs. In contrast, there is a closed class of clause introducers that share
certain syntactic features. These can be divided into optional and obligatory
types, which mark specific clause types, such as negative questions, prohibition,
or others.
The phonology exhibits a comprehensive system of alternations. Of
particular interest are certain morpho-phonological rules that involve both
segmental and prosodic factors: some person markers, for instance, only occur
on verb roots that have a specific number of syllables and end in particular
sequences of segments (cf. §3). The complex pitch-accent system of Urarina, as
analysed in §4 is characterised by alternations observed between different word
The main speaker area of Urarina is the Rio Chambira and its tributaries in the
Urarinas District, Loreto Province of Peru. As shown in the map in (1), the
language was originally spoken between the Urituyacu and Corrientes Rivers.
While it is reported that Urarina has been largely replaced by Spanish on the
Urituyacu River, it is still spoken on the Corrientes River, where it is subject to
increasing pressure by Spanish. As an estimate, the number of speakers is
between 2,000 and 3,000 (cf. 1.4).
(1) Urarina speaker area: overview with names of rivers and tributaries
The main speaker area nowadays is on the Tigrillo River (including Espejo and
Rayayacu) and the Chambira River and its tributaries. As can be seen in the
map in (2), the largest number o f communities (indicated by black squares) are
found in the lower area o f the Chambira, including the Patoyacu tributary. The
lower parts o f the Tigrillo and Chambira Rivers, however, also host most o f the
Mestizo and mixed communities (indicated by white squares). This grammar o f
Urarina is mainly based on fieldwork in Nueva Union, at the Espejo tributary,
which flows into the Tigrillo River.
Due to the remote location, access to the Urarina territory is rather difficult. A
single trip from Iquitos, the capital of Loreto District, to the mouth of the
Chambira River takes up to two days by ship (lancha - a cargo ship which also
takes passengers). From there, it is another day by peque-peque (a small boat
powered by simple motor which is connected to a steel rod with a propeller) in
order to get to Nueva Union de Espejo. The community has a population of less
than 100 (which equals about 15 households) and is in relative isolation from
other places. As the village is surrounded by almost impenetrable swamps,
outsiders hardly find their way to the place and easily get lost, especially in the
rainy season. The community owns a boat, which is used sporadically to
transport crops to the Maranon River, from where they are shipped to Iquitos, in
order to sell them. Access to Espejo areas upriver is only possible by canoe.
The Urarina language is also known under a variety of other names. Most
importantly, the people traditionally refer to themselves as katga 'man', and to
their language as kat$a ere 'man's word'. However, this name is being replaced
by the term Urarina, whose origin is unknown, but there is a traditional
narrative that accounts for the introduction of this term. According to this story,
which has certain funny connotations, a Jesuit priest who first made contact
with the people (katQa) was presented with urari roots as a gift (about this
staple food, see §1.5.1) - and subsequently called them "Urari-na" (cf. Olawsky
2002:214ff). It is unclear whether this anecdotal account can be taken seriously.
Other names by which the Urarina have been known include Shimacu, and
Itucale, which are not in use any longer. Shimacu (or Simacu and other
variants) is understood as a depreciative term and according to Manus (2005
p.c.), could also be based on the Spanish term cimarron for 'salvage'. The name
Itucale (or Itucali and other variants) must have been introduced by error as it
describes the name of a subgroup or clan of Urarina called itokivari (cf. §1.5.3).
The genetic affiliation of Urarina is a controversial issue, partly due to the fact
that veiy little is known about the language's history and about its neighbours.
Urarina has been classified as a member of at least four different languages
families by various authors (Panoan: Velasco 1960:v3, 208; Tupian: Figueroa
1986:253; Macro-Tucanoan: Shell & Wise 1971:14; Andean: Greenberg
1960:794 - all cited in Dean 1994(1):37). A comprehensive summary of the
various approaches towards a classification of Urarina is given in Cajas Rojas &
Gualdieri (1987:16ff). However, based on lexical and grammatical comparison
with the small amounts of data on languages supposedly related to Urarina, it is
difficult to find similarities of Urarina with any of the language groups
mentioned in the literature to date. While the term "unclassified" is one way to
deal with this difficulty, there is evidence to suggest that Urarina ought to be
described as an isolate - a solution also adopted by Cajas Rojas & Gualdieri
It should be noted that "wider vicinity" is not meant to imply actual proximity
to the Urarina territory in a strict sense. Given the unhospitable geophysical
conditions of the rainforest, a trip to any of the groups mentioned (except for
Omurana), would involve several weeks of travel by foot and canoe. As a
guideline, a canoe trip from the mouth of the Chambira up to Mangual may take
between two and three weeks. The map in (3) can only give a very approximate
location of the different languages and their distance from the Urarina territory
is not to scale.
(3) Languages surrounding the Urarina territory (approximate location - not to scale)
1
The transcription of Urarina follows the conventions used elsewhere in this grammar,
whereas the transcription of other languages is adopted from Loukotka.
Further four languages originally spoken in the wider vicinity are now extinct.
The table in (5) is based on wordlists by Tessmann (1930; his transcription is
adopted below). Note that on Pinche/Taushiro no data is available.
- Andoa (Zaparoan) - extinct
- Cahuarano (Zaparoan) - extinct
- Pinche/Taushiro (possibly Zaparoan or Candoshi) - extinct (one speaker left
in 2004)
- Pano(bo) (Panoan/unclassified) - extinct
- Chamicuro (Arawak) - extinct
(6) Lexical comparison with Omurana based on Loukotka (1968:157) and Tessmann
(1930:252ff)
From the lexical items compared in the above tables, it is unmistakable that
none of these languages exhibits any lexical matches with Urarina. Besides, it is
unclear to what extent these groups may have been in contact with the Urarina.
There certainly has been some contact with the Cocama (Tupi), as Urarina
speakers even reported of some cases of intermarriage in the past. At present,
there is no contact between the two languages - and the Cocama language is
struggling despite the relatively large number of ethnic Cocama. Contacts with
some other groups are described as hostile, as these are characterised as
cannibals. There are several old narratives that describe the conflict between
those "indios" (bakaua) and the Urarina, who according to the stories defeat the
attackers in revenge. The Urarina names of these groups are ijioro - which
refers to the Shapra (Murato), fioano (which probably refers to the Pano(bo)),
and kasarena (unidentified - perhaps Cashinahua (Panoan)). Another narrative
mentions a man from the rameseto - referring to the Lamisto or Lama (Munichi
stock), now extinct. The Omurana, - once the group in the closest vicinity to the
Urarina, which even appeared to have a settlement on the Chambira and were
considered non-hostile, were called majßa.
The knowledge about grammatical structures of most of these languages is
very limited. Naturally, a polysynthetic morphology as a general typical feature
of Amazonian languages is also found in the nearby language families. Other
properties such as the presence of evidential markers, or pitch-accent occur all
too commonly in Amazonian languages as to postulate a relation between these
and Urarina. In contrast, for none of the languages listed above, similar
structures such as the properties highlighted in §1 have been reported. Based on
the lexical comparison and on the range of extremely uncommon features found
in Urarina, it is feasible to characterise Urarina as an isolate.
2 t
The Spanish term mestizo describes the descendants of European and native South
American parents. These are monolingual in Spanish.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Summary of social organisation 11
Most people still subsist on hunting, fishing, and food crops. Nearly all animals
that appear to be big enough to make a meal are eaten. Among the common
game are mammals such as tapirs, pacas, peccaries, monkeys, as well as
crocodiles and birds. Snakes and dolphins are not eaten, but jaguars may be
consumed.
Fishing is another important means of subsistence. There are four different
fishing methods; all types of fishing are carried out from a canoe:
a) Fishing with a net (which is left overnight or longer),
b) Fishing with a spear,
c) Using a fishing line and a hook (originally with the thorn of the garabata
liana),
d) Killing (or stunning) fish by poisoning a fraction of the river - these are then
collected.
Plantains and cassava constitute the main vegetable diet. Cassava (Urarina
laano, also known as manioc, or yuca in local Spanish), is one of the most
important staple crops for the Urarina. Another widely used crop is a tuber
called urari (or variant erwari; Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Araceae family) - a
tuber typically grown next to the house and consumed grilled, fried, or as a soup
ingredient.
Some fruit, such as small banana, papaya, maize, and peanuts are also
known and grown, but less commonly. Most crops are also sold to traders. The
fields where these items are grown can be several hours' walk away from the
village. As most people have chickens, eggs also form a part of the diet.
Cassava beer, know as masato in local Spanish (Urarina barue) is a popular
alcoholic drink made from mashed cassava (and sometimes plantain), which is
left to ferment for up to four days. Various texts of the database show that social
drinking has been common since ancient times. Alcoholism is mainly a problem
in communities that depend on river traders who sell trago (high-volume liquor
made from sugar cane).
The tradition of living in longhouses has been largely abandoned as most people
now live in individual houses. While these are typically built from natural
materials, modern building materials such as zinc roofs and nails are highly
valued. Traditionally, houses have a thatched roof and no walls. The floor,
which is about lm off the ground, is made from the trunk of the white nist palm
(Span, porta, Urarina ahtaraa). Poles are tied with lianas. The average lifetime
of a house is up to 5 years, but the roof, made from branches of the chevon palm
(elele) has to be renewed about every two to three years.
Among the items that are produced by the Urarina are blowguns and darts,
hammocks for infants, sleeping mats, clay pots, wooden spoons, baskets,
necklaces, and bags. Fibre from the chambira palm (risijie; or alternatively, the
aguaje palm, alaa - in swampy areas) is the most important material for all
kinds of weaving. While most handcrafted items are produced by women, men
engage in the fabrication of baskets, weapons, and carved items. This includes
paddles and dugout canoes, which are the main means of transport on the rivers,
often used in combination with walking. Items are usually carried with a
tumpline or rope across the forehead.
The division of labour is not clear-cut, but some tendencies can be observed.
Men are in charge of hunting and all different types of fishing, but women may
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Summary of social organisation 13
also fish with a net or with a fishing hook. Women may also accompany their
husbands on hunting expeditions that last for several days. Both sexes carry out
work on the field, such as harvesting, cutting weeds, or fetch firewood. Splitting
firewood is done by both genders, though more commonly by women. In
preparing a field for cultivation, men fell the bigger trees and clear the brush,
which are then left to dry and burnt. Women are responsible for cooking,
washing, and taking care of the children. Men occasionally smoke meat and
prepare their own meals during hunting trips. Cassava beer (Span, masato,
Urarina barue) is made by the women. A popular way of labour is a so-called
minga (a loan probably from Quechua), a kind of community work for which a
man invites the other people of a village to work on his field. The inviter then
provides masato for the entire working party.
There are strict regulations for the coexistence of men and women not
married to each other. For instance, all recordings of text with female narrators
had to occur under supervision of an adult male family member. Alternatively, a
woman could do the recording. Typically, men and women would eat
separately.
Emotional states are not normally shown in public. One aspect worth
mentioning is the avoidance of publicly showing anger. The verb for 'become
angry' (neheratia; cf (914)) is also used to translate the Spanish word for 'hate'
(odiar).
Very little is known about the spiritual life and potential ceremonies, as the
Urarina do not easily share their religious traditions and most details of Urarina
spiritual life were not investigated in detail. Interestingly, there are no
ceremonies for marriage, nor have any rituals at death been observed (there are
no formal funerals). In Nueva Union, the dead are buried in a place about ten
minutes from the village, but the graves are not cared for. Marriages are usually
arranged by the parents. If no bride is available in the same village, the father
would take his son on a trip to another place.3 Brothers frequently marry women
from one family, where feasible. Polygamy is not very common, but legitimate.
However, the first wife has to agree to the husband's taking of an additional
wife. In some cases, a man marries several sisters. The marriage age is around
14 for women and at about 16 for men. There is no dowry, but the man simply
moves in to the wife's family and becomes part of it. This also involves
brideservice, as the husband's labour force now belongs to his new family.
3
In contrast to this, Manus (2005 p.c.) have observed that the girl's parents have to find
a suitable man to marry their daughter.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
14 Introduction
Thus, hunting expeditions are often conducted by two (or more, when including
children), involving the head of family and his son-in-law. A more detailed
account of kinship - and some politeness factors related to the kinship system -
is given in §13.1.
Possibly the only popular ceremony among the Urarina is the consumption
of ayahuasca, a hallucinogenic plant well known for its psychoactive properties.
It is a thick-rooted plant with long leaves and small flowers. The beverage is
based on mashed and boiled ayahuasca vines, blended with at least one other
plant. The Urarina attribute healing power and spiritual wisdom to the
consumption of ayahuasca. The exact rules for the ceremony are unknown to
the author, but participants are required to keep a specific diet for about a week
after participating. There are a number of items especially used for the
ayahuasca ceremony, such as ornaments for the leader of the ceremony.
Apparently, a spiritual leader who performs the ceremony (ayahuasquero), does
not generally have a higher status than other community members, apart from
his healing powers.
People also attribute healing powers to certain plants called biri (cyperus sp.;
piri-piri in local Spanish), which are used as medicinal plants. The Urarina treat
all kinds of diseases with these, which are especially planted and whose
application is strictly prescribed, often in combination with specific dietary
measures. There also are biri which are believed to have magical powers such
as to enable hunters to successfully find certain animals (for each animal there
is a separate biri), or for lovers in order to draw the beloved's attention to
himself or herself. Further functions also include fertilising or infertilising
properties.
Naming is a complex topic, but not much information about it is available at
this stage. New-born children receive Spanish names, but usually names are
given only several weeks after birth, apparently because the parents first wait to
see whether the child survives. Family names are handled in the same way as
the Spanish system; i.e. one name is the father's family name whereas the
second one is the mother's name. Most people also have unique nicknames that
are usually based on some special characteristic of the person or some
experience in the past. For example, one girl is called Lanahaj 'red one'
because she was "red" when she was born. Another person is called Airiu
because he moved to the Espejo from the Airico River. Yet another person is
called Buku 'bone' - apparently due to his skinniness. There also used to exist a
naming ritual in which children were given secret names by a shaman.
However, as this custom has been largely abandoned, no further information is
available on this matter, except that these names appear to have no particular
meaning, but are given as novel names by God. Similarly, not all the details are
known about some names that appear to be clan names. I know of seven names
in total, which are arabura, uhidi, lomajßari, itokoari, nafioiano, d^aitge, and
Over two dozen of these traditional narratives were recorded during the research
project on Urarina language and culture. The text selection in Appendix A
contains one short traditional narrative, which accounts for the creation of two
kinds of peccaries. Many narratives mix elements of traditional religion and
Christianity. For example, in one flood narrative, a man called Adam saves the
son of God from the other people. In the same account told by another speaker,
the character is called Noah. Due to obvious resemblance between characters
such as God's son (who is actually equalled with Jesus in one narrative, but not
in others), the boundaries between traditional and innovative spirituality are not
transparent. Nowadays, many Urarina are Christians (catholic and evangelical),
and aspects of both religions have been merged. A more detailed investigation
of Urarina cosmology will be left to future studies. 4
The text selection in Appendix A gives examples for some of these genres. Four
out of the five texts given there are narratives, which corresponds to the
proportion of narratives in the database, but is also based on the fact that other
texts were too lengthy as to be included here.
For all examples discussed throughout the grammar - if not stated otherwise
- it is tacitly implied that they are "natural" in one or another way, i.e. they are
either parts of speech from natural conversation between native speakers or
between the author and native speaker, or they are embedded in a larger text
independently produced by a native speaker. However, it is well-known that not
all of the questions linguists typically have about the structure of a language can
be answered easily from the occurrence of a given construction in text.
Especially, Urarina has such a variety of morphological phenomena that may
4
For a small collection of narratives, also see Olawsky (2002).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Database and language resources 17
occur only a few times in a specific combination in the entire text database. For
some aspects of the analysis, this may not be sufficient in order to make valid
generalisations about the possibilities and impossibilities of a construction, or
about their productivity. Only in such cases, I have looked for suitable examples
in the N e w Testament translation (abbreviated to N T hereafter), which, with its
abundance of about 218,000 words, is a useful source of examples. Some
further details about the N T translation are mentioned below. Where examples
are absent even in the NT, I relied on elicitation of appropriate examples. These
examples are usually not sentences that were simply translated from Spanish to
Urarina, but they result from questions that arise during the analysis of texts or
in conversations. Where elicited data was used (which is marked in the text) I
tried to match the judgement of several speakers. Overall, elicited examples
represent a very small minority. Some examples, such as short utterances,
phonological data, or word formation are based on observation and knowledge
of the language by the author.
As mentioned above, the overwhelming majority of examples are taken from
the database of natural texts, which are composed of different genres. Nearly all
examples are taken from the Espejo dialect (except §23.1 on dialect
differences). A few examples from other dialects in which no relevant
differences to the Espejo dialect apply are employed as well. 5 In total, four main
dialect areas can be identified, which are sketched in §23.1. Some sample
sentences (repeated in different chapters), which are practical for the
investigation of several different aspects of the grammar, sometimes highlight
their structure in different ways.
Where elicited examples or data from the N T are used, this is indicated. The
proportion of all examples adopted from the N T translation is less than 5%, and
used where specific constructions or combinations of morphemes or phrases
were not available from the text database. 6 While I do not regard examples from
translations as instances of natural text, the translation process implies that such
data is reliable and consistent with speech normally produced by Urarina
speakers. The process of the N T translation has undergone constant revision
over the last few decades and was largely conducted by native speakers of
Urarina. The translation is very free rather than literal and all examples are
reviewed by a range of speakers of Urarina. Each sentence, after being
translated from Spanish to Urarina, goes through a back translation into Spanish
by different speakers and amendments are made, where necessary. In the next
5
Where dialectal differences occur, this is indicated.
6
One half of these occur in the chapters on word classes and NP structure, where a
majority of examples consists of single words or phrases. In these chapters, they
supplement natural examples from the text database, typically in order to illustrate
syntactic or semantic variations.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
18 Introduction
step, further revisions to the grammar and style of each example follows. The
entire process involves a variety of native speakers. Thus, it is plausible to
assume that the N T examples are unlikely to be caiques from Spanish or that
they reflect transfer errors in any way. As far as can be predicted at the present
stage, the N T translation appears to be well understood by the Urarina
community.
Statistics regarding the sound inventory and word classes as presented in the
respective chapters are based on the lexical database - a wordlist of 3,650
entries at the time of completion of this grammar. This should represent a sound
basis for statements on frequency and distribution of the categories discussed.
Texts were recorded from 24 different speakers and it is impractical to list
the details for each individual here. A speaker profile for the recordings from
different dialects is provided in §23.1. The general grammatical description is
based on fieldwork in Nueva Union (Espejo River), and a large proportion of
examples are taken from stories told by the village's most elaborate storyteller,
Medardo Arahuata Manizari. He is the second-oldest man of the village (born
around 1952) and a monolingual speaker. Originally coming from the Tigrillo
River (San Lorenzo), he was one of the founders of the community in the
Espejo. Another important consultant, one of the main helpers in grammatical
analysis, is Julian Nuribe Vela, the village elder and representative (born in
1946), who is known in the entire Chambira basin as a sort of (unofficial)
Urarina ambassador. He is bilingual in Urarina and Spanish and did not learn
any traditional narratives from his ancestors, but has a comprehensive
vocabulary of Urarina and good understanding of grammatical structures. His
parents moved from the Urituyacu River to the Chambira River shortly after he
was born. From there, he moved on to various places, including the Tigrillo
River, where he stayed for several years. Then he followed his father-in-law
(Medardo Arahuata's father) to the Espejo and became one of the village
founders. In fact, most inhabitants of the Espejo community are in some way
related to each other and further important consultants include Medardo's
brother, Julian's sons, and a number of people related to either of these as in-
laws. A brief speaker profile for further consultants is given in §23.1.
1.7.1 Transcription
With regard to rules that are subject to a high degree of variation, I have given
the examples in accordance with the original recording. This would sometimes
result in individual differences, such as the realisation of vowels that have
allophones in free variation, or the realisation of certain consonants in some
words, which may be subject to variation due to optional rules. These include
the variation between [u] and [o], [hw] and [fw], [r] and [d] or [t]. All variations
are also clearly identified in §3. Most variations depend on differences between
individual speakers, some on dialectal differences, but a few may also occur
speaker-internally. Note that all examples except for §23.1 on dialects are from
dialect zone A - Espejo (where some speakers may exhibit strong influence of
the Tigrillo dialect due to their heritage). Some examples are illustrated in (8).
These include phonological variations and lexical differences between speakers
or sometimes speaker-internally.
a) Phonology:
Variation Representations Phonemic Narrow Gloss
in g r a m m a r structure transcription
[u] ~ [0] omari, umari /umari/ [omari], [umari] 'basket'
[hw] ~ [fw] hwuera, fuera /fwuera/ [hwuera], [fuera] 'obstacle'
[d] ~ [t] dada-e, data-e /dada-e/ [dadae], [datae] 'touch'-3ps/E
b) Lexicon:
Representations Phonemic Narrow transcription Gloss
in g r a m m a r structure
itulere, tulere /itulere/ [itulere], [tulere] 'all kinds o f
akaaru, kaum /akauru/ [ahkauru], [kauru] 'they' (3pl)
naamanaa, (dialect-based) [naamanaa], [enamana] 'young man'
enamana
kami, kaami /kaa+nii/ [kanii], [kaanii] 'this'+'that'
= 'sort o f
ne, na /ne/, /na/ [ne], [na] (subordinate marker)
knane, kuanaj /kuanaj/ [kuane], [kuanaj] 'inside'
opposed to as <aj> for the diphthong. Further details are given in (9) and will be
further analysed in the respective sections.
Tone has been marked in chapters 2 to 4 only, as it may be relevant for the
discussion of some phonological structures. Tone is not marked in the rest of
the grammar, as it is not essential for the discussion of most topics and at least
partly predictable from the rules presented in §4. Also note that the transcription
of tone follows some specialised conventions due to typographical overlap of
nasalisation and tone marking. These are explained in §4. Another feature only
used for phonological analysis is the representation of /u/ as the underlying
phoneme for what can be realised as [u] or [o], alternatively (cf. §2.3).
When nasalisation occurs on a long vowel, it is marked on the first vowel
only, as the spread of nasalisation follows a predictable rule (cf. §2.8.10). For
instance, the expression for 'where is?' is transcribed as äaka, though
nasalisation applies to both VV segments, more narrowly transcribed as [ ä ä k a ] .
In diphthongs, nasalisation is marked on the first vowel, such as in haü
'because'.
A note is also in order regarding the orthography used in literacy materials
and in the N T translation. These are largely based on the Chambira dialect area
(zone C; cf. §23.1), since it has the largest number of speakers. 7 As a tendency,
the N T translation is narrower in that it includes some alternations in the
7
Note that this grammar is based on dialect zone A. However, the dialects are mutually
entirely intelligible as most differences are of a minor nature (cf. ch. §23.1).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
22 Introduction
transcription that are omitted in the transcription used here. This includes
optional vowel lengthening and most cases of nasal spreading. The orthography
is based on the Spanish spelling system and does not include any symbols apart
from this. This results in the representation of the central high vowel / « / as <u>.
The allophony between [u] and [o] is accounted for by writing any underlying
vowel /u/ (which can be pronounced as [u] or [o]) as <o> in the orthography.
Glides are represented by their full vowel counterparts, such as <i> for [j], <o>
for [w], etc., which is shown in detail in (10). Glides in hiatus are transcribed as
<h>. Nasalised vowels are followed by <n> in the orthography.
Another rule regards the representation of diphthongs and long vowels, which is
similar to the transcription used in this grammar. Diphthongs are spelled as a
sequence of two vowels, such <ai> for [aj] and <ao> for [aw]. In contrast,
sequences of two non-identical vowels are spelled as a long vowel plus a short
vowel, eg., [aai] = <aai>.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Terminology and conventions 23
The representation of examples in this book may slightly vary with regard to the
context in which they occur. Most examples that require an interlinear
translation consist of three lines, which represent the Urarina transcription, an
interlinearised gloss, and a free translation in English, as exemplified in (11a).
In examples, where an instant understanding of complex syntactic structures is
essential, such as in the chapter on constituent order and some other chapters
that involve syntax, I have bracketed syntactic constituents and added a line to
specify these, as illustrated in ( l i b ) , where the arguments of the verb (V) are
clearly marked as A and O. In some cases, such as shown in (11c), marking of
arguments may be simplified in that only the clause structure is indicated, but
not every single constituent of each clause.
g
For an explanation of animal terms such as 'kinkajou' (a monkey-like mammal) see
Appendix B.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
24 Introduction
a) Possessive NPs:
raj n=arai-tQuru raj hi-a ku-e
[POSS 3ps=family-PL] for tell-NTR go-3ps/E
'He went to tell his family.'
b) SVCs:
ahaenaa su-ahi-a=ne ku-u
weed [kill-CNT-NTR=FOC: l s g go-lsg/E]
Ί went to weed grass.'
Some other words have multiple meanings, as listed in (14). Since these
meanings, which include pairs such as 'give' and ' m a k e ' are semantically
related, it would be implausible to assume that they represent separate lexical
entries. However, the interpretation of the respective meaning depends entirely
on the context. Therefore, I found it useful to provide the appropriate glossing
in the respective examples. In other words, a word such as tia is glossed as
' g i v e ' in some examples and as ' m a k e ' in others.
The different translations for the last two examples in (14) are based on
variations in their function. The form kaiiii (or variant kaanii) can function as a
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
26 Introduction
gap filler (e.g. in pause), or have multiple other functions, which are discussed
in §22.5. The variation between the enclitics for focus, which in principle can
occur with lsg or lpl reference, is due to variations investigated in §19.
Some words have an English translation that is impractical to display due to
its length. These are abbreviated in the interlinearised translation and include
some terms for animals or plants, such as illustrated with two different types of
peccaries in (15). Where an English term is unavailable, the local Spanish name
of plants and animals is provided. A list of the scientific names and local
Spanish names for all plant and animal terms is given in Appendix B. In cases
where the scientific name is unknown, only the name in local Spanish is given.
In a small number of examples, no exact identification was possible; these are
glossed as 'type of fish', 'type of tree', etc. A simplified translation was also
chosen for some words that involve a complex deictic definition, such as
locational demonstratives, which are discussed in detail in §5.6.2, but
abbreviated to 'there' or 'over there' in glossing them. In a similar way, the
glossing of the weak and strong prohibitive markers and their variants is
simplified to ' d o n ' t ' , but discussed in detail in § 15.2.
a) Square brackets:
itQaf(f)a-anu hana-te lejhii nii eene-etga mla-t(t)o-a=ne hau
shoot-lsg/D when=FOC one that woman-only fall-INTS-3ps/D=SUB because
'When I shot it [the monkey], as the female fell down ... [the male tried to escape].'
b) Round brackets:
kiuajtel kohwanoo ari-a ku-akaanu hau tabiit$a lejhii ru-hi-ana-e
again next.day seek-NTR go-lpl/ex because finally one find-DIM-ILT-3ps/E
'As we went to seek [turtles] again on the next day, he (my son-in-law) finally found
one.'
Where practical, in some examples, the context from which the example was
taken, is also added. This describes the situation in which a sentence was
uttered; alternatively, the free translation of the sentence preceding the example
is given, to allow a more thorough embedding of the example into a specific
context.
Where Urarina words are used in text, they are given in italic style. Verbs
are quoted in their citation form, if not indicated otherwise, as in itQaa 'do',
which morphologically consists of the root it$a plus the 3ps/A suffix -a. Note
that the addition of a slash and the capital letters /A, /E, and /D after person
markingYefers to the person inflection class as investigated in §11.
When I first made contact with the Urarina, they had reason to be suspicious
about the inquisitive gringo who came to learn things about their language. All
too often the Urarina had been deceived and exploited by outsiders. I would like
to thank the people of Nueva Union de Espejo for their trust in receiving me and
my family in their community. Not only did they provide living space, but in a
growing relationship of trust over the years they also shared many of their
customs with me. Most importantly, they made great efforts in searching for
ways to let me understand the structure of their language. There are two people
whom I must mention first of all: Medardo Arahuata Manizari, a top storyteller
and musical artist, spent days if not weeks trying to remember the stories he had
heard in his childhood. This has layed the foundation for preserving an
impressive range of traditional narratives for future generations. Julian Nuribe
2.1 Consonants
Urarina has only four stops and, in terms of phonemic distinction, the feature
[+/-Voiced] is distinctive only in one case (/d/ vs. /t/). However, some dialects
the distinction between /d/ and It/ tends to be neutralised, as is outlined in
§2.1.3. Voicedness contrast otherwise only exists as a non-phonemic alternation
for the affricates [t$ / CI3], which occur in complementary distribution (cf.
§2.1.9). There are nasal consonant phonemes in three different places of
articulation, plus a velar nasal whose occurrence is restricted to a predictable
environment (cf. §2.8.1). Labialisation of /k/ and /h/ and palatalisation o f / h / are
widespread features; while their occurrence is largely predictable by vowel
copying, the consonants /kw/ and /hj/ have phonemic status, as some examples
show (cf. §2.1.6; §2.1.12). [fw] and [hw] function as allophones in the
innovative language, but they were distinct sounds in the traditional language,
of which only a few remnants are documented (cf. §2.1.11). The rhotic /r/ has
several possible realisations and is transcribed as <r> throughout this grammar.
As investigated in §2.1.3, it also exhibits some variation with /d/.
The relative frequency for the occurrence of consonants is illustrated in (18).
The numbers indicate the frequency of types in the lexical database. The total
number of entries is 3,365, including ideophones, derived words, loans, affixes,
and onomatopoeias. The numbers for /kw/, /hj/, and [ji] represent their
phonemic occurrence, i.e. in non-predictable environments. That is, for /hj/,
only such instances were counted that do not occur in environment where /hj/ is
preceded by /i/ (which would trigger vowel copying; cf. §2.8.3).
It is evident that out o f 16 phonemes, only five can be considered frequent (i.e.
10% or more), /r/ and ft/ are the most frequent consonants; nasal consonants
make up about a fifth o f all consonants and /h/ and IkJ are comparatively
frequent as well, whereas most other sounds are less common. In the following
sections, each consonant and its respective allophones are introduced. I have
grouped the discussion of the respective sounds according to allophonic
variations and similarity o f the occurring alternations.
2.1.1 /t/
The phoneme /t/ is not restricted in its distribution: it occurs as a syllable onset,
in word-initial and word-internal position with any vowel.
(19) Distribution o f / t /
a) In word-initial position:
/tarara-a/ [ta.ra.raa] 'pull'-3ps/A
/temule/ [te.mu.le] 'plant'
/te-a/ [ti.a] 'give'-3ps/A
/tururi/ [tu.ru.ri] "llanchama tree'
/turu-a/ [tu.ra.ä] ' arrive'-3 ps/A
b) In word-internal position:
/atane/ [a.ta.ne] 'earth'
/ate/ [a.te] 'fish'
/kuretea/ [ku.re.ti.ä] 'buy'-3ps/A
/nituane-a/ [ni.to.a.ni.ä] 'be like that'-3ps/A
/situ-a/ [si.ttt.ä] 'pass'-3ps/A
In the Chambira dialect [t] also occurs as an allophone o f /d/ in some words. In
the word for 'sky', for instance, the pronunciation may vary between [ d e t e ] and
[ d e d e ] (cf. §2.1.3 on /d/).
2.1.2 Μ
In general, there are no restrictions in the distribution of the phoneme Irl. The
following examples illustrate its occurrence in different positions before
different vowels.
(20) Distribution of Μ
a) In word-initial position:
/ra-a/ [raä] 'receive'-3ps/A
/rela-a/ [re.laä] 'teach'-3ps/A
/rihe/ [ri.hje] ' p i f a y o tree'
/rüa/ [rü.ä] 'side'
/ruaka-a/ [ru.a.kaa] 'carry'-3ps/A
b) In word-internal position:
/ arai/ [a.raa.i] 'family'
/ere/ [e.re] 'word'
/bahari/ [ba.ha.ri] 'tinamou'(type of heron: Tinamus major)
/aruba/ [a.ru.bä] 'giant otter'(Pteronura brasiliensis)
/barae/ [ba.m.e] 'masato' (cassava beer)
What I represent as the phoneme Irl has a wide phonetic range between different
speakers and speaker-internally. The rhotic is normally realised as a retroflex
flap [f], but in some cases the tongue goes back not as far as retroflex position.
In fact, it may be close to an alveolar tap [r] (down to 20 msec occlusion time),
but typically has a longer occlusion time than that (40-90 msec). In some
variations the occlusion time can be longer (ca. 110 msec), which may result in
a pronunciation as a stop close to [d] (or [t] in some dialects). Most typically,
this realisation of Irl occurs before the front vowel III, which is a matter of
assimilation. In word-initial position, the rhotic tends to be pronounced as a
retroflex approximant [^J.
Cajas Rojas & Gualdieri (1987: 87) propose a systematic rule for the
variation of this consonant: "A retroflex affricate changes into a vibrant in
morpheme-internal position." In the examples they give (illustrated in (21a)),
the retroflex is pronounced as [r] (rather than [.(] within the root, but as [j] at
morpheme boundaries). In the Espejo dialect (cf. (21b)), the difference between
root-internal position and position at a morpheme boundary is not systematic:
the rhotic is pronounced as a flap or tap, with some variation, in any word-
internal position.
b) Espejo dialect:
/lureri/ [lu.^e.^i], [lu.re.ri] 'house'
/ rauru-i/ [^au.^o.-i], [ .jau.ro.-i] 'be healthy'-2ps
/ratiri-ri-tc§«=ni/ [^a.ti.|;i.-|;i.-tQä«.=ni], 'leave'-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS
[^a.ti.ri.-ri.-t(^äö.=ni]
2.1.3 /d/
The fact that Irl can be realised with a long occlusion time sometimes makes it
difficult to distinguish from /d/. In fact, some of the younger speakers appear to
have neutralised the distinction and use /r/ and /d/ in free variation. Older
speakers of the Espejo dialect, however, clearly distinguish the two phonemes,
with one complication: speakers of the Chambira dialect (and possibly some
other dialects) realise /d/ as [t] in some words. For instance, the word /dede/
' s k y ' is pronounced [dete] in the Chambira dialect. This variation could be
regarded a factor that enhances the loss of distinction between /r/ and /d/ in the
innovative language. Otherwise, the phoneme /d/ is observed in most
phonological environments, as illustrated in (22).
The phoneme /d/ also occurs with loans such as doktoro 'doctor', dosmildos
' 2 0 0 2 ' , gobernadoro 'governor', or homomda ' c o m m u n i t y ' . The presence of
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Consonants 35
2.1.4 /b/
c) /bo/ in loans:
/bote/ [bo.te] 'boat' (loan from Spanish)
/bolsa/ [bol.sa] 'bag' (loan from Spanish)
/klabo/ [klä.bo] 'nail' (loan from Spanish)
2.1.5 /k/
The velar stop /k/ is found before /a/, /i/, /u/, and /«/. Before /e/, it is attested in
two examples only, and in loans.
2.1.6 /kw/
a) Word-initial position:
/kwaaane-a/ [kwaa.ö.ni.ä] 'create'-3ps/A
/kwatia/ [kwa.ti.ä] 'don't' (Prohibitive introducer)
/kwena-a/ [kwe.naä] 'laugh'-3ps/A
/kwitca-a/ [kwi.tcaä] 'heal'-3ps/A
In a few examples, some of which are shown in (26), /kw/ is found root-
internally without being a result of labialisation.
One evident point of discussion is whether /kw/ is a combination o f /k/ and /u/
synchronically. This is in fact the case in some examples in which the initial
/kw/ is decomposed into two single parts after palatalisation (cf. 3.5.1). When
the word hverehe 'child' is combined with the 2sg possessive clitic i=, it is
realised as [i.tpu.e.re.he]. The transformation o f /kJ into [t$] is a result o f a
palatalisation rule and therefore the "stranded" labial glide is realised as a full
vowel. This is due to the fact that [t£w] is not a possible sequence in Urarina
phonology. Another case is the occurrence o f the associative marker h i - with
some nouns: the word it$ana for 'blood' is cited as [ k w i . t ^ a . n a ] , (underlyingly
/ k u - i t £ a n a / ) ; however, under certain conditions, it will occur without the
initial [kw] sequence, which s h o w s that it is a separate morpheme (also cf. §7
on possessives).
On the other hand, there are many words in which /kw/ is not a prefix, nor
subject to any alternation, as was illustrated in (25). The most convincing
evidence, however, is given by a minimal pair: the word for 'medicine' is
pronounced as [ k w i ] , whereas there is a word [ku.i], which means
'overripe/foul'. While it may well be the case that the /kw/ ~ [ku] alternation
indicates the diachronic origin o f /kw/, it does not support the claim that all
occurrences o f /kw/ are underlying combinations o f /k/ + /u/ synchronically.
2.1.7 /$/
(27) Distribution o f / s /
a) In word-initial position:
/sau-a/ [saa.a] 'cut'-3ps/A
/ setu-a/ [se.tu.a] 'rot'-3ps/A
/sini-a/ [si.ni.ä] 'sleep'-3ps/A
/su-a/ [su.ä] 'kill'-3ps/A
/sari/ [su.ri] 'intestine'
b) In word-internal position:
/ arasane/ [a.ra.sa.ne] 'dew'
/eseneta-a/ [e.se.ne.taä] 'believe'-3ps/A
/anisihja/ [a.ni.si.hjä] 'main pole of the house'
/sunajjia/ [so.naj.jta] 'afternoon'
/es«/ [e.sa] 'chinbillo tree'
2.1.8 ///
The palatal voiceless fricative is quite infrequent and mainly occurs in loans.
Nevertheless, a few native examples are found.
(28) Distribution o f / / /
The occurrence of /J/ in word-internal position is even rarer and only attested
for a few words in the Espejo dialect. In the Airico dialect, Is/ tends to be
realised as [[] after l\l and after nasalised vowels. Though I cannot confirm this
for all cases, I have recorded a few examples in which this rule applies:
2.1.9 /tQ/,[d7j
c) Occurrence of [dg]:
/ djakari/ [d3a.ka.ri] 'crocodile'
/djala-a/ [dja.lu.a] 'distribute'-3ps/A
/d3«/ [d30] 'where'
/d3«h»leni-a/ [d 3 ii.h«.le.ni.a] 'stop'-3ps/A
9
Note that there is a slight asymmetry between the voiced and voiceless allophones, as
the exact counterpart of [tp] would be the voiced alveopalaatal affricate [d?].
However, the voiced affricate tends to be realised as [d 3 ].
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
40 Phonology
Also recall that /t^/ can be the result of palatalisation in words with the proclitic
i= and an initial /kw/, as was mentioned in §2.1.6.
There are some words that begin with the sound sequence /i/ + /t$/, such as
/ i t ^ a s u / 'companion'. The Γι/ in these examples is mute in rapid speech. It is
well imaginable that diachronically, the few examples that begin with the
voiceless affricate may have been preceded by l\l as well. Thus, the rule that
transforms initial /t$/ into [CI3] is almost without exception. As a consequence, I
do not consider [CI3] a separate phoneme. For the occurrence of /t$/ as an
allophone of /r/, see §3.2 on phonological alternations.
2.1.10 /h/
The glottal fricative /h/ can occur as a syllable onset with most vowels, in any
position. However, it is extremely rare before /«/, except in cases where this is
the result of vowel copying (e.g. / s u u . h a / - [sHu.h a a] 'heart').
a) In word-initial position:
/hanuri/ [hanori] 'back'
/here-a/ [he.ri.ä] 'want'-3ps/A
/hit^ana/ [hi.t^a.nä] 'blowgun'
/huhu-a/ [hu.hu.ä] 'increase'-3ps/A
/htftmo/ [huH.no] 'nice smell'
b) In word-internal position:
/ahaane/ [a.haa.ne] 'ashes'
/aheri/ [a.he.ri] 'stone'
/ahinia/ [a.hi.ni.ä] 'before'
/kajahuri/ [ka.ja.hu.ri] 'cumala tree'
/d3«hulene-a/ [d3n.hu.le.ni.a] 'stop'
After /a/ After lei After III After /u/ After /«/
Before [ah.te] [eh.to.e] [bih.to.a] [kuh.ti.a] [tnh.ttt.a]
It/ 'fish' 'owl monkey' 'trap' 'invite' 'mash'
Before [ah.ka] [eh.kti.a] [lih.kii.to.a] [muh.ku.a] [buh.ku]
Ik/ (pron. 3sg) 'nest' 'smash' 'burn' 'bone'
Before [d3ah.t£ö] [heh.t^a] [kih.tQa] [tuh.t^a] —
Generally, postvocalic aspiration occurs after all short vowels (never after long
vowels), but in fewer contexts after /i/ and / « / (however, these are lower in
frequency than other vowels anyway). Thus, the quality of the preceding vowel
is not a criterion for or against aspiration. Postvocalic aspiration mainly occurs
before voiceless stops (including affricate ItQl and the labialised velar /kw/).
Aspiration also occurs before /s/ and /l/. The phenomenon does not occur before
Irl, /b/, and before nasal consonants. The absence of aspiration before /t$/, /l/,
and /kw/ after some vowels may again be due to the relatively low frequency of
these phonemes.
Manus (2001, p.c. about the Chambira dialect) attribute the aspiration to
both syllables involved and call it "pre-consonant onset"; their consultants
realised words with "something close to a geminate", such as in [ak.ka], [at.te].
This is in fact a dialectal variation found in the upper Chambira area (cf.
§23.1.8). Cajas Rojas & Gualdieri (1987: 57-64) treat this phenomenon as
aspiration and describe it as "a case of coarticulation conditioned by a preceding
High tone". Their account suggests that aspiration
"... occurs between a syllable with Η tone and a voiceless or lateral consonant.
Aspiration is present when the tone-bearing syllable is open and its nucleus is an
oral vowel; it never occurs with closed syllables or with nasalised vowels."
(34) Postvocalic aspiration in prefix and root (data from Cajas Rojas & Gualdieri
1987)
There are two fricatives that phonetically only minimally differ from each other
and are in fact not distinguished by most younger speakers. While these were
distinguished at an earlier stage of the language, the two consonants /hw/ and
/fw/ have lost their phonemic distinction in most words. In the innovative
language, [hw] (a labialised glottal fricative) and [fw] (a labialised labiodental
fricative) are "nearly" in free variation. As a tendency, most words that begin
with one or the other consonant are now pronounced with /fw/; there are only
four examples of words that begin with /hw/. In addition, there are a number of
words for which the two main consultants could not agree on a "correct"
pronunciation even though both speakers are not part of the younger population.
Most younger speakers would also disregard the /hw/ of the examples in (35b)
and pronounce them with [fw].
c) Disputed pronunciation:
/fwuera/ [fwu.e.ra / hwH.e.ra] 'obstacle'
/fwaitu-a/ [fwä.i.to.ä / hwu.i.to.ä] 'cover'-3ps/A
/fwafwaka-a/ [fwa.fwa.kaä / hwa.hwa.kaä] 'lift up'-3ps/A
For older speakers (who speak the traditional language), the two sounds have
distinctive function in a few words, as one known minimal pair illustrates.
The scenario described here makes it difficult to state whether /hw/ and /fw/ are
actually different phonemes. It is evident that the distinction is in the process of
being lost and that sooner or later, /hw/ will cease to exist as a distinctive sound
of Urarina. As one can thus postulate that there is no distinction in the
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
44 Phonology
contemporary language, I do not regard [hw] and [fw] separate phonemes and
therefore transcribe the phoneme as /fw/. However, [hw] plays an important role
elsewhere in the phonology of Urarina: When /h/ follows /u/ in word-internal
position, it is labialised and thus is realised as [hw], as a result of vowel copying
from the left. In these cases, the transcription [hw] is retained (also cf. 2.8.3).
Another observation regards the use of /fw/ as the more prominent of the two
sounds in question: in loans, /fw/ is used to represent /p/, such as frequently
occurs in Spanish words:
2.1.12 /hj/
Similar to /hw/, /hj/ can be the result of vowel copying through /h/ (cf. §2.8.3).
But /hj/ also functions as a phoneme, mainly occurring in word-initial position.
Its distribution is restricted, as it occurs before the vowels /a/, /u/, and / « / only.
In a few examples, /hj/ occurs in a different context, i.e. not in initial position
and not preceded by /if:
There are reasons to believe that /hj/ originally is a sequence of /h/ + /{/, at least
in some examples. Similar to the idea that [kw] could be a result of reduction
f r o m /ku/ (cf. §2.1.6), one could assume that the glottal fricative /hj/ is the result
of an underlying syllable /hi/, when another vowel follows. This is illustrated
with the examples in (41), which contain roots followed by a " m e r g i n g " suffix;
i.e. the final vowel of the root merges with the attached suffix. For example,
when the locational noun makuhi 'upriver' is followed by the location suffix - « ,
the final /i/ of the noun merges with the suffix and the word is resyllabified. A
similar situation applies to the two other examples, with some morpho-
phonological complications. The word for ' s h a r p e n ' contains the causative
suffix -a, which merges with the final syllable of the verb root.
2.1.13 ///
T h e lateral /l/ does not have any restrictions in distribution. It occurs in initial or
internal position of the word and can precede any vowel.
a) In word-initial position:
/lana/ [la.nä] 'husband'
/lenone/ [le.no.ne] 'food'
/likiitu-a/ [li.kii.to.ä] 'mash'-3ps/A
/lureri/ [lu.re.ri] 'house'
/lnae/ [ln.ae] 'nightmare'
b) In word-internal position:
/alaa/ [a.laä] 'agnaje tree'
/lele/ [le.le] 'tongue'
/ mamale-a/ [ma.ma.li.ä] 'make stick'-3ps/A
/mulu-a/ [mo.lo.ä] 'cut off -3ps/A
/alulari/ [a.lu.ltir.i] 'termite nest'
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
46 Phonology
2.1.14 /η/
a) In word-initial position:
/nahari/ [na.ha.ri] 'liver'
/neda-a/ [ne.daä] 'stay'-3ps/A
/nisisi-a/ [ni.si.si.ä] 'wipe off-3ps/A
/nuri/ [no.ri] 'giant river turtle'
/nane/ [nu.ne] 'branch'
b) In word-internal position:
/ena/ [e.nä] now
/ahaane/ [a.haa.ne] 'ashes'
/ajrinia/ [aj.ri.ni.ä] 'outside'
/kunu/ [ko.no] 'light'
/enaa/ [e.nH.ä] 'tree'
2.1.15 /m/
Similar to /n/, there are no restrictions in the distribution of the bilabial nasal
/m/.
a) In word-initial position:
/amiane-a/ [a.mi.a.ni.ä] 'work'-3ps/A
/meseri/ [me.se.ri] 'cocona tree'
/ misi/ [mi.si] 'umbilical cord'
/mulu-a/ [mo.lo.ä] 'cut off-3ps/A
/maka-a/ [mu.ku.a] 'catch'-3ps/A
b) In word-internal position:
/ama-a / [a.maä] 'take along'-3ps/A
/temeeku-a/ [te.mee.ko.a] 'stand together'-3ps/A
/amiane-a/ [a.mi.a.ni.ä] 'work'-3ps/A
/kumu-a/ [ko.mo.ä] 'fall down'-3ps/A
/lemn-a/ [le.m«.a] 'sink'-3ps/A
2.1.16 /β/
In the Chambira dialect, /j1/ does not occur in word-initial position, but is
always preceded by Γι/ in all environments. This is based on a rule of
palatalisation that applies when /i/ is followed by /n/ (cf. §2.8.9). Consequently,
[ji] is not a phoneme in the Chambira dialect. However, in the Espejo dialect
described here, the palatal nasal is developing its status as a phoneme, since the
initial /i/ is usually omitted. What is iflaara in the Chambira dialect is realised
as paara by Espejo speakers (though variations may occur). In general, the
occurrence of /jV in initial position is rather rare: while this consonant occurs in
the lexical database 195 times, most of the occurrences refer to predictable
environments (i.e. after /i/); its occurrence as a phoneme, in initial position is
only 31 times (cf. (18)). An alternative analysis of /jt/ would be to assume that
an optional rule that deletes a word-initial /i/ before /n/ applies and thus results
in the realisation of words that begin with [ji].
The word-initial position is the only environment in which /ji/ is not
predictable. Otherwise, the palatalisation rule mentioned above applies. The
examples given in (45) show two possible pronunciations of the words. In the
Espejo dialect, the realisation without the /i/ is preferred.
However, there are some words in which an initial /i/ is present before /n/. In
the two examples where /n/ is preceded by /i/ and followed by another /i/, the
palatalisation rule does not apply. When a different vowel follows, /n/ is
palatalised.
The dialectal differences may indicate that the initial /ji/ in the Espejo dialect
originates from an initial sequence /i/ + /n/, which resulted in palatalisation; the
initial /i/ was then dropped. In fact, it could be expected that the words in (46b)
above) will lose their initial /i/.
The palatal glide [j] is not a phoneme, but is realised in hiatus between two
vowels (cf. §2.8.1). It does not occur in word-initial position. However, it can
also be suspected that an underlying l\l is realised as [j] between two identical
vowels. All attested examples involve two /a/ vowels, which surround the glide
[j]. There are three different ways to analyse this, as is exemplified by haja
'horn'.
Analysis 1: /ha.ja/: [j] is a consonantal phoneme and functions as an onset for
the second syllable. This is a possible analysis, but one would wonder why
[j] does not occur in word-initial position then.
Analysis 2: /ha.i.a/: [j] is a realisation of l\l between two identical vowels, but
phonetically reduced to form an onset for the second syllable, due to
resyllabification.
Analysis 3: /haj.a/: [j] is underlyingly the offglide of a diphthong /aj/. This is the
most likely analysis since it accounts for [j] not occurring in word-initial
position and for the fact that it is not found between other identical vowels
(*/eje/, */ojo/, etc.).
Further examples illustrate the occurrence of [j] as part of the diphthong /aj/
without being followed by another /a/. In conclusion, [j] is not a phoneme.
Similar to its palatal counterpart, the labial glide /w/ has a transitional function
between /u/ and a following vowel (cf. §2.8.1). In other environments, the same
analysis as for the palatal glide can be applied to [w]. It does not occur in word-
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Phonotactics 49
2.2 Phonotactics
The previous section has shown that most consonant phonemes occur relatively
freely in word-initial and word-internal position, before any vowel. There are a
few deviations from this, as was discussed in detail. The following table gives a
summary of the phonotactic distribution for all consonant phonemes. As a
general observation, one can say that some consonants occur more freely in
word-initial position rather than word-internally. Regarding the occurrence
before certain vowels, it is observed that there are a few restrictions. With /«/,
the distribution is most restricted, but it should be noted that this is also the least
frequent vowel in terms of statistical frequency (cf. (52)). Another observation
is that there is a correlation between the frequency of consonants (as stated in
(18)) and the compatibility with vowels: the less frequent a consonant is, the
higher is the possibility that it may not be compatible with all vowels.
It should be mentioned that deviations from the regular phoneme inventory are
observed in ideophones (also cf. §5.14). Examples for these are combinations of
sounds that do not normally occur in a sequence, such as a stop followed by a
glottal stop (e.g. Ρεεε to imitate the sound of a rifle). However, since the
realisation of these sounds may vary substantially from speaker to speaker, they
are not included in the presentation of the sound system.
Another aspect is that speakers who are highly proficient in Spanish may
adopt consonant combinations are or even new consonants into their phoneme
inventory. Phonological structures occurring in Spanish loans include /p/, g/,
and a range of consonant clusters, such as stops followed by l\l or Irl. A further
feature sometimes copied from Spanish is the use of coda consonants in loans.
A more detailed discussion of this is found in §23.3.
2.3 Vowels
Urarina has five vowel phonemes. One major point of discussion is the status of
/u/ (cf. (55)). Another issue is to what extent vowel length is distinctive or not
(cf. §2.4). None of the short vowels is subject to any restrictions regarding its
distribution, as is illustrated by the examples in (53). They occur as a syllable
nucleus in initial, internal, and final position of a word.
i
a u
e
a
The words in (53) represent examples for the occurrence of each vowel in
different positions of the word.
Id
/elu/ [e.lo] 'rain'
/enanihja/ [e.na.ni.hjä] 'canoe'
/eresi/ [e.re.si] 'tomorrow'
/ahaane/ [a.haa.ne] 'ashes'
/i/
/iha/ Ei-hja] 'lighthouse tree'
/iniu/ [i.ni.jo] 'meat'
/it$a-a/ [i.teaa] 'do'-3ps/A
/itanitQa/ [i.ta.ni.tpa] 'mud'
/«/
/«-a/ [«.ä] 'come'-3ps/A
/ökari/ [ti.ka.ri] 'ant eater'
/aluktri/ [a.lu.lö.ri] 'termite nest'
/buk«/ [bu.ku] 'bone'
The preferred phonetic realisation o f the mid vowel /e/ is as a closed vowel. The
phoneme /»/ can be characterised as a high central, (slightly) rounded vowel,
with some (optional) variation. Depending on individual preferences, words, or
dialects, it may also be realised as [a] or [i].
/u/
The situation for this vowel is slightly more complicated than for the others, as
there is a high degree o f variation between [u] and [o] (with [o] typically being
realised as a closed vowel). The occurrence o f the two allophones is not entirely
predictable from the phonological environment, which indicates that these
vowels are in free variation. In fact, there exists no minimal pair that would
prove the distinctive status o f /u/ vs. /of. There also is no convincing evidence
as to which o f the two would be underlying, as both can occur in the same
contexts. However, the distribution o f the two can be described as connected to
certain preferences. For practical purposes, I will describe /u/ as the base
phoneme.
As there is variation among speakers and speaker-internally, it is not easy to
pinpoint the actual preferences for the realisation o f /o/. First o f all, the
preferences appear to be entirely arbitrary and I will not attempt to interpret
these as results o f phonetic regularities. Secondly, while there are some general
tendencies related to phonological environment, some words may be
pronounced differently from what would be expected, which reflects the reality
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Vowels 53
of free variation. The tables in (54a,b) give a fairly accurate overview of the
general preferences of occurrence for each allophone. For most tendencies,
some deviations are also stated. For instance, [u] is the preferred allophone after
/k/, with the exception of the stative/diminutive suffix -koa and, as a tendency,
in word-final position. Similarly, the affricate Ιίς,Ι normally triggers the use of
[u], but in the word for ' o n ' (and some other exceptions), [o] is preferred.
Note that the occurrence of /u/ after other consonants is too rare as to indicate
any reliable preference. A further regularity is that a preference for
pronunciation as [u] may change to [o] before nasal consonants. For instance,
the word / k u m u a / 'fall down', tends to be realised as [komoa] due to the
presence of the nasal. Thus, the preference of [u] after /k/ is overridden. Further
exceptions regard loans of any kind, where pronunciation is adapted to the
source language. An example for this is [ k a r t u t ^ o ] from Spanish cartucho 'rifle
shell', which is pronounced with [o] despite the preference for [u] after /tp/.
While I have characterised /u/ as the underlying vowel. I will follow the
"preferred pronunciation" in my transcription, i.e. each vowel will be
transcribed based on the actual realisation of each example given by the
speaker, while it will be assumed that the actual underlying representation is /u/.
aa ee ii uu uu
No aari eene ii — uune
onset Ίορα tree' 'woman' 'you' 'branch'
r raa reemae ruha fieruuka hiruulene
'receive' 'dog' 'grandfather' 'come off "thread'
t taa tnteema satu netooka hituuhe
'that' 'chop' 'all' 'hang up' 'fried'
η ηaa Hnee mi koJnuamo —
(cont.) aa ee ii uu
fw ifioaaja) afioeera fioiiaka nofiooo —
J 1 ßaara kiuipeeria — — —
'you.2pl' 'exploit'
J faetoa — — — —
'step on'
Similar to the frequency distribution of single vowels (cf. (52)), /aaJ is the most
common long vowel found in Urarina words, whereas / « « / again is
comparatively rare. Some gaps in the above-table may again reflect the fact that
combinations with lower frequency consonants are less likely to occur.
The crucial question is to what extent vowel length is distinctive. On the one
hand, it is significant on the grammatical level, since the combination of roots
with suffixes results in vowel lengthening under certain conditions. One
example is the imperative -u. When it is suffixed to a verb whose root ends in
/«/, the form results in a long vowel (cf. §3.3).
identical can still d i f f e r from each other by their tonal structure, which gives
a l m o s t no r o o m f o r minimal pairs in a strict sense. All o f the f o l l o w i n g m i n i m a l
pairs are not clear-cut, as they involve non-lexical w o r d classes, loans, or
m o r p h o l o g i c a l l y c o m p l e x f o r m s in o n e or the other w a y . In addition, speakers
h a v e d i f f i c u l t i e s in recognising the d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n these pairs. T h i s s h o w s
that v o w e l length plays a very marginal role on t h e lexical level.
Based on these aspects it the overall status of vowel length for Urarina
phonology becomes a bit clearer. On the one hand, there is a high degree of
variation between long and short vowels on the lexical level, with only minor
distinctive function. On the other, entire processes depend on syllable weight.
More research will be necessary in order to explore the exact conditions under
which vowel length is predictable or optional. In the meantime, as I have shown
that vowel length is relevant especially in complex morphological
environments, I will assume that it is phonemic.
10
Lengthening mainly occurs with /a/ and /e/. However, it is unclear whether this is
systematic.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Vowel sequences 59
There are some combinations of vowels that cannot occur in a sequence of two
separate syllables. These are indicated as "—" in (62).
The impossible combinations mainly involve /«/ and /u/. As a regularity, /«/
does not co-occur in any combination with /u/ in any order. Another illicit
sequence is [e.a], which is the result of a phonological rule: Id is realised as [i]
before /a/ (cf. (82)).
An important feature of vowel sequences is the occurrence of transitional
glides in hiatus between two subsequent vowels. These are [j], [w], and [uj],
which are inserted depending on the first vowel of a sequence. Their
distribution is described in §2.8.1.
There is only one example where a sequence of identical vowels occurs on
the lexical level: in the verb e?eoka 'shout', the sequence of two instances of Id
is interrupted by a glottal stop. However, the meaning of this verb as 'shout' is
clearly realised as an onomatopoeic word, imitating the nature of shouting.
However, a similar situation applies to the combination of verb roots that end in
/a/ when these are followed by the negative of the lpl form: in this case, the
root-final /a/ is followed by the negative suffix -a, which in turn is followed by
the initial /a/ of any lpl suffix, such as -akaa?m for lpl/ex. In combination, the
2.6 Diphthongs
(63) Diphthongs
e i u u
a ae aj au an
e —
ej — (en)
i — — — —
u — — — —
tt — — — —
a) /aj/
/najne-a/ [naj.ni.ä] 'be able'-3ps/A
/ajrinia/ [aj.ri.ni.ä] 'outside'
/ ajtu-a/ [aj.to.ä] 'say'-3ps/A
/hajti/ [haj.ti] 'still'
b)/au/
/alau/ [a.läu] 'spider monkey'
/ itpau/ [i.taäu] 'life'
/auna-a/ [au.naä] 'hear, feel'-3ps/A
/mausa/ [mau.sä] 'blind person'
c) / a « /
/akau/ [a.käu] 'water'
/kau-a/ [kaa.ä] 'go home'-3ps/A
/hauria/ [haö.ri.ä] 'earlier'
/auenu/ [aa.e.no] 'sacha culantro herb'
d) /a e/
/reemae/ [ree.mäe] 'dog'
/asae/ [a.säe] 'in'
/esijiae/ [e.si.jiäe] 'really'
/d3aereku-a/ [d3ae.re.k0.a] 'be angry'-3ps/A
e)/ej/
/ ejt$u/ [ej.tsu] 'cashapona tree'
/enejtp«/ [e.nej.t£«] 'monkey'
/atejjia-a/ [a.tej.jiaä] 'mortally wound'-3ps/A
f)/e«/
/karen/ /k«.ren/ 'after'
There are certain regularities that apply when full vowels are involved but do
not apply with the offglide of a diphthong. For instance, vowel copying is
triggered by /i/, /u/, or /«/ when these are followed by /h/, /k/, or Irl (for details
see §2.8.3). / r u r a n a / 'sweat' is realised as [ru.rwa.na]. However, vowel
copying does not apply through Ikl and Irl when any of the consonants
mentioned are preceded by a diphthong: /auri/ 'paucar bird' is pronounced
[au.ri], not *[au.rwi]. n
Some occurrences of diphthongs are non-phonemic. For instance, the
diphthong [e«] does not occur on the lexical level, except for one example, the
postposition kureu 'after'. However, 1 suspect that its underlying form is
/ k u r a a / i.e. [en] functions as a variant of /an/. 12 [en] also occurs in
combinations of /e/-final noun roots that are followed by the locative marker /-
ul.
The diphthong /ej/ is very rare, and there is some variation in its
pronunciation. Usually, an alternative pronunciation as [ee] is possible:
11
However, vowel copying is attested with diphthongs whose offglide spreads through
Ihl.
12
For instance, the form ku-re-ü ('go'-IRR-lsg/E) Ί would go' may be realised as
[kti.reö] or [ku.räa] in some dialects (cf. §23.1.6).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
62 Phonology
[uj] is another diphthong that does not exist as a phoneme, but it occurs in
several examples. The fact that it is found in the same environment in all three
examples in (67) - between /k/ and /ji/ - indicates that the underlying structure
of these words is actually /kwiji.../, i.e. /kw/ followed by /i/ and /n/ (which is
palatalised in turn). As the phonetic difference between /kui/ and /kwi/ is
minimal (i.e. merely a matter of length), the forms may surface as [uj].
does not apply when the root ends in a diphthong (cf. §3.1.3). Thus, the
distinction between diphthongs and vowel sequences is reduced to the
segmental level; the distinction between diphthongs and long vowels is a
different one on the segmental and on the prosodic level.
Urarina has four transitional glides whose occurrence can be predicted in terms
of their phonological environment, [j] is realised in hiatus in vowel sequences
where the first vowel is /[/. (Note that the underlying vowel is Id in some cases,
but realised as [i] before /a/; cf. §2.8.4.)
a) In root-internal position:
/iana/ [i.ja.nä] 'older sibling'
/kulia/ [ku.li.ja] 'mass'
The labial glide [w] is realised in hiatus in vowel sequences where the first
vowel is /u/.
a) In root-internal position:
/rüa/ [rü.wä] 'side'
/etue/ [e.to.we] 'owl monkey'
When /«/ is followed by another vowel (which is not /«/), the voiced velar
approximant [u\] functions as a glide between the two. The examples in (71)
show the application of this rule in root-internal position and between root and
suffix.
a) In root-internal position:
/kaane/ [k«.u|a.ne] 'in'
/barue/ [ba.ra.iqe] 'masato'(cassava beer)
/ahjaui/ [a.hjatt.uji] 'obilla tree'
Note that in the example enua above, nasalisation spreads all the way through
two vowels and /h/ from the initial consonant /n/ (thus surfacing [e.nü.gä'] in a
narrower transcription). This rule does not apply when a non-transparent
consonant (i.e. all except /h/) interrupts the nasal spread, as the example nukue
[ n u k t f i q e ] 'creek' illustrates: in this case, the transitional consonant is not
nasal: * [ n a k » g e ] (cf. §2.8.10)
[g] may also occur in loans before a velar stop. It should be noted that the
velar nasal also occurs in the respective source languages and has been adopted
into Urarina. The word 'minga' shown in (73) also has a velar nasal in Spanish
and according to Adelaar (2004, p.c.) "All the Quechua dialects assimilate the
nasal to velar position before a velar consonant." Since the occurrence of
[g] does not occur in native Urarina words, I do not consider CV+[g] a separate
syllable type.
In (62) it was shown that sequences of /«/ and fuf do not occur. This regularity
is due to the fact that assimilation takes place when /«/ is preceded by /u/. A
typical example for this is the suffixation of the 3pl suffix -uru to a verbal root
ending in /u/.
b) Assimilation to [o]:
/masu-urn/ [ma.so0.ru] 'parakeet'-PL
/enu-ura-a/ [e.noo.ra.ä] 'enter'-PL-3ps/A
b) Assimilation to [o]:
/ajtu-«/ [aj.töo] 'say'-lsg/E
/ajtu-«/ [aj.too] 'say'-IMP
While one might suspect that the assimilation of /u/ could be a morpho-
phonological process, as it is mainly observed with the plural suffix and with
the imperative form, it has to be acknowledged that Urarina does not have any
root-internal sequences of /u/ + /«/. It may thus be assumed that the absence of
such a sequence is due to the fact that assimilation has been a result of
diachronic variation as well. Since there is no material available to prove such
T h e p r o c e s s of v o w e l c o p y i n g can be characterised as h o m o r g a n i c v o w e l
insertion a f t e r certain consonants, which include /h/, /k/, and Irl in Urarina. For
e x a m p l e , the c o n s o n a n t /h/ is a f f e c t e d by the presence of /i/, /u/, and / « / . A s a
result o f an optional rule, these v o w e l s spread rightward t h r o u g h the c o n s o n a n t
and are realised as palatalisation, labialisation, and "retroflexisation",
respectively. N o t e that all three s o u n d s that are a f f e c t e d by this rule are velar or
post-velar. V o w e l c o p y i n g operates word-internally, b e i n g in roots or roots with
derivational or inflectional affixes. For e x a m p l e , the labial glide o c c u r r i n g with
the /h/ in the word duhwa 'cedro masha tree' can be a s s u m e d to be a result of
/u/ s p r e a d i n g rightward. T h e r e are no e x a m p l e s in the language w h e r e a /h/-
initial syllable f o l l o w i n g a /u/ w o u l d not be labialised. In the s a m e w a y , /i/
carries t h r o u g h /h/ and c h a n g e s it into [hj], / « / operates in the s a m e w a y and
results in a m o d i f i e d variant of /h/, which I transcribe as [ h u ] here. Phonetically,
the /h/ is fronted and could probably be transcribed as [x] or [ χ ] (voiced
velar/uvular fricative). E x a m p l e s f o r all three alternations are given b e l o w . T h e y
illustrate both root-internal alternation and vowel c o p y i n g across s u f f i x
boundaries.
In a similar manner, vowel copying may also occur through the velar stop IVJ.
However, in this case, the rule is restricted to the vowels /u/ and /«/. With /i/, no
vowel copying is observed. I have demonstrated in §2.1.6 that /kw/ functions as
a phoneme in word-initial position. If w e look at its occurrence in word-internal
position (including morphologically complex words), it becomes evident that
the labial portion of this sound is a result of vowel copying. (77) lists some
examples for this and also illustrates this process with the vowel /«/.
Word-internal [kw] is almost always preceded by /u/. However, this rule does
not apply to clitics. For example, a /kw/-initial word can be preceded by a
proclitic that does not contain /u/, such as in ka=hvedaj 'my visitor', where the
proclitic functions as a possessive marker for lsg. Another exception regards
the distributive suffix -ahua which in itself illustrates that /kw/ is not
necessarily the result of vowel copying.
Another consonant that can be affected by vowel copying is /r/, but the rule
tends to have a much more optional status in this case. In particular, its
application is limited to only a few speakers of the Espejo dialect, and it is less
common in other dialects (cf. §23.1.2). For instance, the word for 'Urarina' can
be pronounced with or without vowel spread: [urwarijia / urarijia]. A few
more examples for vowel copying through Irl are given in (78). Note that again,
/i/ is not subject to this rule. With /«/, the process is highly optional and rare.
The example urari is noteworthy as the actual pronunciation of the word in the
Espejo dialect is [ e r w a r i ] ; in this case the labialisation has remained although
the initial vowel was replaced by /e/ (the pronunciation urari is from the
Chambira dialect). Also note that there are counterexamples, showing that the
rule does not consistently apply in all words:
There also is a palatalised form of the rhotic. However, this is not the result of
vowel copying, as one could expect, [rj] only occurs as a shortened version of
Iril before another vowel, as illustrated below.
The vowel copying rule through Irl does not apply to clitics: when the emphatic
attitudinal marker =ra is attached to a host, it is never realised as [rwa] even
when the vowel lul precedes it. Similarly, vowel copying does not apply
through the reportative enclitic =he. This is in so far remarkable as enclitics
otherwise follow the same rules as suffixes.
In summary, one can say that vowel copying occurs through consonants whose
place of articulation can be characterised as "back" as it involves velar,
retroflex, and glottal consonants.
2.8.4 Vowel raising
An important rule that accounts for the absence of the sequence /e.a/ in roots, as
mentioned in (62), is dissimilatory vowel raising: when /e/ is followed by /a/, it
is raised to [i]. The same rule also applies between roots and suffixes, or
between two suffixes: when a root-final Id is followed by a suffix that begins
with /a/, it is raised to /i/. When it is followed by a suffix that begins with any
other vowel, /e/ remains unchanged.
The fact that /e.a/ is not a possible vowel sequence of Urarina indicates that the
alternation described here is of a general nature.
The nasalised diphthong /a«/ can be simplified by deleting its component /«/ (in
stressed or unstressed syllable). Typically, the vowel /a/ is lengthened to [äa],
but shortening to [ä] may also occur. This rule is optional and speaker-
dependent, but it can occur in any position in a word.
An optional rule observed in rapid speech only is the occurrence of the voiced
affricate [CI3] in word-internal position. As mentioned earlier (cf. §2.8.3), the
underlying syllable /ri/ can be reduced to [rj] in rapid speech if another vowel
follows. The resulting sequence [rj] + [V] is optionally realised as [ d 3 ] + [V], as
the following examples show. Note that all instances of this phenomenon shown
in (84) occur on the last syllable of the word, (which carries a Η tone).
Note that the last example nemurju involves the locative suffix -«, which
merges with the final root vowel of any word it is attached to (cf. §3.4) and
therefore changes the final syllable into [rj«] as the result of a morpho-
phonological rule. The syllable is then further changed into its alternant ^ 3 0 ] .
The rule does not apply to other suffixes that begin with /«/. For instance, the
lsg/E suffix -ü does not merge with the last syllable and subsequently is
realised as a syllable sequence /i.«/.
2.8.7 /aj/~~[ej]
The last two examples in (85) involve a suffix that merges with the vowel
preceding it and the final syllable therefore should be realised as [aj]. Through
As mentioned in §2.5, the glottal stop has no distinctive function on the lexical
level. There is only one root (and derivations of it) in which ΠI occurs: the word
for 'shout/cry', e?eeoka (and the related form e?ee.ehoa). As this example may
be considered as onomatopoeic, it can be characterised as marginal anyway.
Interestingly, the glottal stop seems to function as a boundary segment between
two identical vowels of which the second one is long. This matches similar
constellations in words where the glottal stop occurs at suffix boundaries: ft!
occurs in vowel sequences in which a short vowel is followed by a long vowel
(or by another vowel sequence). In the negative form of some verbs, the glottal
stop is predictable by this rule: in [kwa.ra. ? aa.ü] Ί have not seen it', it
functions as a boundary marker between the root-final /a/ and the negative
suffix -a (followed by the lsg/E suffix -«). Similarly, it forms a boundary
between /a/ and -e-i (NEG-2ps, with the negative suffix being lengthened before
the 2ps suffix), as in [i.tpa. ? ee.i] 'you have not done it'. Apparently, the
insertion of /?/ is only necessary when a short vowel is followed by a long
vowel or by a vowel sequence; it does not apply in the opposite direction: in
[i.teaa.i] (/itpa-i/ - 'do'-NEG-3ps/A) 'he did not do it', a VV syllable is
followed by a vowel without involving a glottal stop (note that vowel
lengthening of the root-final vowel occurs before the 3ps negative form).
Since the occurrence of the glottal stop is predictable, it is not regarded a
phoneme. Regarding the nature of the examples described above, it can be
stated that the insertion rule for the glottal stop applies root-internally and
across suffix boundaries.
When the alveolar nasal /n/ (in its function as the onset of a following syllable)
is preceded by the front vowel /i/ or its realisation as an offglide [j], it is
palatalised to [ji].
This rule also applies across clitic boundaries. As exemplified in (87), this
includes the final negative enclitic =ne, the subordinate marker =ne (with
conditional function here), the interrogative marker for polar questions =na, and
the attitudinal markers =naare and =naate.
Palatalisation, such as all other rules discussed in this chapter, does not apply
across word boundaries, as in (88), where the initial /n/ of 'say' remains
unaffected by the preceding /i/. Interestingly, palatalisation occurs with the
copular auxiliary nei (which is a form of the copula), when it is attached to
numerals, nouns, and passives. However, the status of the auxiliary as a clitic-
like element is further discussed in §2.11.
a)
kurete-i na-1 [ku.re.tee.i naa.T]; *[jiaal]
buy-2ps say-PRT 'saying you bought it'
b)
nii nukue [nii nn.ku.e]; *[jia.k«.e]
that river 'that river'
c)
ahina-i nii anofioa [a.hi.jiaa.i jiii a.no.fwä]; *[jtii]
sharp-NEG:3ps/A that knife 'That knife is not sharp.'
a) Root-internal spreading:
/rüa/ [rü.ä'j 'side'
/seeuha/ [see.ö.hwä'] 'big (thing)'
/ahäauri/ [a.hää.öri] 'turtle' (type)
/nuhe/ [nö.h*ge] 'excrements'
'jaguar' 'woman'
CV ba.a — be.ru ku.raa
'bag' 'way' 'name'
CVV fwe.i — kwa.taa kö.raa.naa
'firewood' ('so that not') 'chief
Syllable weight plays an important role for certain tone assignment rules (cf.
§4). An aspect that has not been explored in detail regards the circumstances
under which moraic structure is significant. In most contexts, a heavy syllable
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
76 Phonology
a) Initial CC cluster:
[kti.rä.bo] 'nail'; Span, clavo: [kla.bo]
[ta.rää.fwa] 'fishing net'; Span, trampa: [tram.pa]
[te'.fwo.lo] 'church building'; Span, templo: [tem.plo]
b) Coda consonant:
[do.ko.to.ro] 'doctor'; Span, doctor, [dok.tor]
[ba.ra.de] 'bucket'; Span, balde: [bal.de]
[be.se.ta] 'party'; Span .fiesta: [fjes.ta]
C V root (plus a zero suffix for 3ps/E) and a few nouns. 1 3 The word for 'skirt' is
hu (referring to the cloth women wrap around their waist); 'rat' is sa; besides
that, there is the word u 'death'. The latter obviously is a derivation of the verb
ua ' d i e ' .
(93) CV words
Otherwise, the majority of Urarina words are not only longer than CV, but
typically have more than one syllable. Most monosyllabic nouns and verbs (and
a f e w other monosyllabic words) contain a long vowel or a diphthong.
Looking at nominal roots, it is evident that most nouns are trisyllabic (talking of
simplex nouns, i.e. strictly underived, canonical words that can occur in
isolation without further inflection). This result corresponds to a count
conducted by Cajas Rojas & Gualdieri (1987:43); their numbers are indicated in
the rightmost column of the table in (95). 14
13
"Zero suffix" more exactly is the result of merging between the 3ps/E suffix -e with a
root which ends in /e/ or /i/, as discussed in §3.4.
14
Cajas Rojas and Gualdieri (1987) state they based their count on 1,000 nouns, but do
not make further specifications on how they define this group. Given that they
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
The notion of "Phonological Word" 79
Verb roots do not occur by themselves and are neither independent grammatical
nor phonological words. They are accompanied by the neutral suffix -a (or
allomorphs -ka or -tQa) in the citation form. Their typical length can be
deducted from the table displayed in (96). 15
As becomes evident from the above table, the average length of an underived
verb in its citation form is two to three syllables. Verbs shorter than that are
comparatively rare; only 24 verb roots with CV structure are attested (which
occur as CVV syllables in citation form, e.g. ha-a [haa] 'make'). Verb roots
with four syllables are more frequent than that, but with less than 10%
constitute a minority. This clearly confirms the tendency already observed for
Urarina nouns: roots that have an average of three syllables are the preferred
type.
include nouns with six syllables (which are absent from my count), I suspect that
they included morphologically complex nouns in addition to simple roots.
15
I define underived verb roots as not containing a derivational suffix as discussed in
§10.
As was stated in §2.1.10, a word can have only one postvocalic aspiration, at
least in the Espejo dialect. There is no known clitic that could be added to a
word and that would increase this potential. For instance, attaching the clause-
final enclitic =ra (realised as [tpa] after /i/) to the noun /kalaui/ 'son', can have
two realisations: a) [kah.la.wi.t^a], with aspiration after the first syllable, or b)
[ka.la.wih.t^a], with aspiration after the final syllable of the noun. However,
this restriction cannot be tied exclusively to the phonological word, since it
overlaps with the grammatical word.
Another word-related phenomenon observed in Urarina regards the
distribution of tones: every word (in isolation) tends to have exactly one Η tone.
When words are combined to syntactic constructions, different rules apply, but
this will be discussed in detail in the following section.
2.11 Clitics
Clitics are relevant for the discussion of the phonology of a language as they
typically exhibit phonological peculiarities. At the same time their status is also
important for the grammatical structure of a word. More accurately, clitics
represent a special kind of unit for the distinction between "word" and "affix".
It is widely agreed that clitics are phonologically deficient from a typological
point of view. Typically, this means that a clitic does not bear prosodic features
such as stress or tone. The situation in Urarina, however, is not quite as simple
as that, since the numerous clitics found in the language can be distinguished
from each other by a range of features. The grammatical properties and
functions of clitics, and their relative order when attached to a verb, are
discussed in §12. Here I will analyse the status of the clitics listed in (97) as
elements that share properties otherwise assigned to words and affixes.
However, as will become clear, it is not possible to divide clitics into clear-cut
classes, as the features they share with each other or with affixes and words
overlap.
One factor which clearly distinguishes clitics from affixes and words is the
fact that their selectivity is not restricted to a single word class, whereas this
applies to affixes. Many clitics can be attached to a variety of categories
including nouns, verbs, adverbs or other verb classes. Beside that, some clitics
may occur on variable positions within the clause, which is not the case for
affixes. In (97), a list of Urarina clitics and their function is given.
le= 'one'
ka= lsg possessive or object proclitic
i= 2sg possessive or object proclitic
ni= 3sg possessive
ka=, ni=, ta= Short forms of demonstratives kaa, nii, taa
=t$e Politeness
=ni Witness evidential
=he Reportative
=lu Remoteness
=tau Reassurance
=na Interrogative
=ne Negative question; Prohibitive
=te Rhetorical question
=ra Emphasis
=ta Frustrative
=naare Warning
=naate Fear
=na, =ne, =te Focus
~ne Subordination
lexicalised form (while the combination of word plus affix can be lexicalised).
O n e feature that enclitics and suffixes in Urarina have in common is that
enclitics undergo most phonological alternations in the same way as suffixes
(except for vowel copying; cf. §2.8.3). Not all enclitics are subject to
phonological alternations but this is due to the fact that their initial phonemes do
not alternate in general. In practice, there are three different alternations that can
be observed with enclitics:
1. All enclitics beginning with the nasal /n/ are subject to palatalisation of their
initial /n/ to |JL] after /i/ (cf. §2.8.9).
2. Nasal spreading applies to the reportative clitic =he in the same way as to
suffixes beginning with /h/ (cf. §2.8.10).
3. In the emphatic attitudinal marker =ra, the initial Irl undergoes palatalisation
to [tp], which complies with a morpho-phonological rule discussed in §3.2.
Clitics beginning with /t/, /tp/, or /l/ are not subject to any phonological
alternations. I therefore conclude that enclitics do not differ significantly from
suffixes with respect to their segmental properties and behaviour. However, one
difference between some suffixes and clitics should be mentioned: in §3.4, I list
a number of suffixes that merge with the root of a preceding verb. In contrast,
there are no enclitics that would merge with any segmental material that
precedes. Since the merging rule is of a morpho-phonological nature (rather
than a general phonological rule), it cannot be stated with certainty that this is a
criterion for the general distinction of suffixes and enclitics, but it may indicate
a tendency for their disparity. Regarding the order between affixes and clitics,
there is uniformity among enclitics, as they always follow suffixes. Proclitics
and prefixes do not co-occur as there is only one productive prefix in the entire
morphology.
T h e major distinction in Urarina is between proclitics and enclitics. There
are only a few proclitics, whereas enclitics form a much larger class. Other
features by which a classification of Urarina clitics is possible are listed below
and partly based on Aikhenvald (2002: 43). The relative order of clitics that co-
occur with each other and their grammatical function are discussed in §12 on
verbal morphology.
T h e most frequently occurring proclitics in Urarina are bound pronominal
forms. On the one hand, these can be attached to a noun: in this construction,
they have possessor function (cf. §7), which is illustrated in (98). The second
form given here is the variant with a full pronoun. Also note that a number of
morpho-phonological alternations apply to the combination of these proclitics
and the root (cf. §3.5; §7.1.3).
(98) Proclitics for lsg, 2sg, and 3sg with possessor function
a) lsg:
ka=hitgana / kanu hitQäna
lsg=blowgun
'my blowgun'
b) 2sg:
i=tQuerehe / ii kioerehe
2sg=child
'your child'
c) 3sg:
n=ahitga / raj ahitQa
3sg=older.brother
'his older brother'
On the other hand, when they are cliticised to a verb, they function as an object
pronoun as shown in (99). In this function, they can be followed by verbs or
postpositions. Note that the 3sg form does not occur as an object proclitic with
verbs, as 3ps objects do not surface (cf. §18.1).
(99) Proclitics for lsg, 2sg, and 3sg with pronominal object function
a) lsg with postposition:
ka=ke / kanu ke
lsg=VLI
'with/to/at me'
The status of the proclitics as clitics as being different from words is revealed
by their tonal structure: proclitics are fully integrated into the default tonal
structure of a noun (which surfaces with a final High tone) whereas the presence
of a full pronoun triggers certain tonal patterns that are inherent to nouns (for
details cf. §4.6.1).
In addition to the pronominal clitics, there are short forms for the three
demonstrative pronouns occurring in Urarina. When cliticised to a host, these
lose their vowel length: kaa is shortened to ka=, nii appears as m=, and taa may
occur as ta=. The shortened demonstratives have the same functions as their full
counterparts and occur as modifiers in a NP or as a noun. They can be shortened
in the NP or when they function as a noun in object position. In subject position
the short forms are not attested. Similar to the pronominal proclitics, the short
forms of the numeral and the shortened demonstratives are attached to the word
that follows and form a prosodic unit with it, i.e. they lose their tone and
become part of their host with respect to tone assignment.
Urarina enclitics form a larger group than proclitics. There are three main
properties that are relevant for the distinction of the different clitic types -
selectivity, position, and tonal behaviour.
Selectivity regards the type of host a clitic can be attached to. Some clitics
are cliticised to the final word of a clause, which can be of almost any word
class, depending on the structure of the clause. 16
16
"Any" word class includes classes with a high degree of lexical content, whereas
classes with a highly functional load, such as conjunctions, introducers,
interrogatives, interjections, and particles are excluded.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Clitics 85
a) With adverb:
hjauipe hja-i kau=ne
don't urinate-2ps here=NEGF
'Don't urinate here!'
b) With noun:
ta u-ri-tg,a=i ii komasaj=ße
NEGQ come-IRR-3ps/A=ASS 2sg wife=NEGF
'Won't your wife come?'
c) With verb:
nihjauria reemae hasasa-i=ße
don't dog untie-2ps=NEGF
'Don't untie the dog!'
Other enclitics are attached to verbs only, as is the case with mate and tau.
They can be combined with other clitics, as shown in (101), where =tau follows
the reportative =he. As a matter of fact, the frequency of these clitics is
relatively low (except that =tau forms the (lexicalised) hearsay marker hetau in
combination with =he; cf. §12.3.5); The marker =mate is observed in a handful
of examples only (and all of these utterances consist of a verb only). Therefore
it is difficult to exclude the possibility that they could appear on a word
different than a verb. The "warning" enclitic =iiaare is attested in combination
with nouns, but the example given in (101b) must be regarded as a verbless
exclamation, which rules out the attachment to a verb.17
a) naate:
kunajti-a=naate
be.sick-3ps/A=FEAR
'Is he sick?'
b) naare:
akano=naare
snake=WRN
'There is a snake!' [implies 'be careful!']
17
The insertion of =naare in this example is optional. In most situations, people would
simply shout the word for 'snake' without any additional marking.
c) tau:
aj-a hetau kiuajtei ßoaelu
AUX-3ps/A (REP=REAS) again earlier
'Then, again, earlier there was [a story].'
Some enclitics can also occur on clause introducers, as shown in (102). More
exactly, the position of the clitic depends on the introducer: with the negative
question introducer ta and the prohibitive hua, the clitic must be attached to the
introducer (cf. (102a-c)), while with kiuatia and nihjauria, there is freedom of
choice (cf. (102d-e)). With other introducers than the ones listed below, clitics
only occur on the verb (cf. §5.10).
a) ta + =na:
ta(=na) u-ri-fo=~i=pe / *ta u-ri-ki=l-pe=na
NEGQ=INT come-IRR-2ps=ASS=NEGF NEGQ come-IRR-2ps=ASS=NEGF=INT
'Won't you come?'
b) ta + =he:
ta-he ate muht-i=ße / *ta ate muku-i=ße=he
NEGQ=REP fish catch-2ps=NEGF NEGQ fish catch-2ps=NEGF=REP
'Have you not caught any fish? he asks.'
c) kiua + =he\
kzua=he su-a / *hva su-a=he
don't=REP kill-NTR don't kill-NTR=REP
"'Don't kill him!" he says.'
d) kiuatia + =he:
huatia=he itQa-i / kiuatia itg,a-i=hje
not=REP do-NEG:3ps/A not do-NEG:3ps/A=REP
"'He did not do it", he says.'
e) nihjauria + -he:
nihjauria=he su-i=pe / nihjauria su-i=ße=he
don't= RE Ρ kill-2ps=NEGF don't kill-2ps=NEGF=REP
'Don't kill him! he says.'
has actually seen it, but pretends not to. Also note that =ra cannot be attached to
other introducers.
ta-ra hoara-i=pe
NEGQ=EMF see-2ps=NEGF
'Didn't y o u s e e it?'
It should be mentioned that the enclitics =lu and =m occur in combination with
=tau as taum and taulu, which are lexicalised forms with adverbial function to
mean 'earlier' (cf. §12.3.5).
Another criterion for the distinction of clitic properties is the position within
the clause, as already mentioned above. A number of enclitics appear only in
clause-final position, while some can (or must) be attached to introducers if one
is present. The focus markers =m, =m, and =te (cf. §19), which may be
attached to any lexical word class, naturally occur after the element(s) they shift
into focus. This can be a phrase, a phrase plus an adverb, or a dependent clause.
The subordinate marker =ne always follows a dependent clause, which in turn
may end in any lexical word class.
The interrogative enclitic =na exhibits a peculiarity in so far as it does not
only occur in clause-final position and after introducers, but may also be
attached to the first constituent of a clause. In this position it implies focusing
emphatic function, similar to the focus markers mentioned above. The details of
this are further discussed in §21.
a)
d$a(=na) itQa-i ßonei
what(=INT) do-2ps like.this
'What (the heck) are you doing like this?'
b)
enejtQu=na kohiuajte-i
monkey=INT like-2ps
' D o y o u like m o n k e y ? ' [implying 'What do you like - m o n k e y ? ' ]
The third distinctive feature for Urarina enclitics regards their tonal structure.
From a cross-linguistic point of view, clitics tend to be prosodically deficient;
i.e. they typically do not have stress or tone. However, about half of the Urarina
enclitics do follow this tendency in that they carry a Η tone in addition to the
tone pattern on the word they are attached to. 18 Normally, a verb has only one
High tone, regardless its number of syllables and suffixes. The position of the
tone largely depends on the tonal structure of the word preceding it. Thus, if an
enclitic is attached to a verb and forms part of its prosodic structure, it would be
expected that it complies according to the tone pattern the verb would have
without the clitic. For instance, if the pattern assigns the High tone to the first
syllable, the clitic, which is in final position, will not bear a tone, as only one
tone per word can occur. This is indeed the case for a number of enclitics,
which are marked by "No" in (105), as they do not carry a tone. In contrast,
there are enclitics that always carry a Η tone, even though a tone is already
assigned to the rest of the verb. In this respect, they behave like independent
phonological words. The clitics =ne, =tau and =m carry a tone when directly
attached to a verb, but they do not when another clitic follows, (which in turn
carries a tone).
ι ο
It is necessary to comprehend the general tonal structure of Urarina verbs, but this can
only be summarised here; for further discussion, see §4.2.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Clitics 89
a)
anuri pe-ene
parrot be-NEG:3ps/E
'It is not a parrot.'
b)
kasi=ße-Ί kuraanaa
'seven'='be'-PRT chief
'seven males'
c)
anuri na-a raj kuraa
parrot say-3ps/A POSS name
'Its name is "parrot".'
This rule takes almost idiosyncratic status when it comes to the behaviour of /n/
when the copula follows the participle suffix -1, which would be expected to
trigger palatalisation, as can be observed in (107): the first occurrence of the
copula (βέϊ) undergoes palatalisation because the passive form that precedes it
ends in /i/. However, the second instance of the copula (ne) is not palatalised
even though the participle form ends in /i/ as well. There are two possible
explanations for this behaviour: Firstly, palatalisation does not occur twice in a
row; i.e. the rule applies only once per Phonological Word. In this case it must
be postulated that the form ( i t g a n o i ß e l ) represents one Phonological Word,
which could be argued for as the copular part of it does not bear its own High
tone. The second copula (ne) could be considered an independent word, carrying
a tone, and therefore not being subject to the rule. However, this does not
explain the presence of High tones on the copula when it follows a noun.
a)
nitoaneT ÜQa-mi=ße-! ne
like, that do-PASS=be-PRT be:3ps/E
'It is done like that.'
b)
kiveta-noi=ße-l ne=lu
clear-PASS=be-PRT be:3ps/E=REM
'It was being cleared.'
Alternatively, one might assume that for some reason, the palatalisation rule is
not triggered after the participle form, whereas it does apply after the passive.
This view is supported by another example, where the rule does not apply
either. In fact, palatalisation of [ne] would change the meaning: with the same
sentence ending in soijie the jussive form would be understood, to mean 'that
man ought to kill the monkey'. Thus, another possible reason for not applying
the rule could be that ambiguities are to be avoided.
Urarina has a wide range of phonological alternations that do not apply in all
contexts, but which are specifically associated with certain morphemes. Due to
the complexity of the applicable rules and a high degree of idiosyncrasy the
discussion may appear discouraging at first sight. While 1 outline the
regularities in a basic manner, complications and deviations from the general
rules are also investigated, which demonstrates the array of conditions involved
in formulating morpho-phonological regularities. One intriguing aspect of some
of these rules is the relation to word length and, in part, the role syllable weight
plays for the assignment of certain affixes. A predominant role in this regard is
the allomorphy of plural and person marking: many forms involve alternations
that determine the presence or absence of the consonants [k] and [t$] (cf. §3.1).
Many morpho-phonological rules apply between roots and suffixes; these are
discussed in §3.1 to §3.4. Another set of rules regards the combination of pre-
root elements and roots, which is investigated in §3.5. Whether these are
specific to the respective morphemes or whether these are rules that generally
apply between roots and proclitics cannot be determined since only a small
number of preverbal elements (i.e. prefixes or proclitics) exist. §3.6 discusses a
number of optional simplifications that typically occur in rapid speech.
The plural suffix -uru has the allomorphs -kuru, and -t$uru, which are in
complementary distribution. However, the exact conditions for their occurrence
are not straightforward and some exceptions apply. A particular problem is the
distinction of the suffixes -uru and -kuru, as the conditions under which they
occur can only be predicted in terms of statistical tendency, rather than a 100%
proof solution. As a tendency, most nouns that take the plural with -kuru are
trisyllabic, but some nouns longer than that also take this suffix.
T h e list of trisyllabic nouns that take the plural suffix -kuru also includes loans
and proper nouns, which indicates a certain productivity of this rule:
Loans that have less or more than three syllables do not strictly follow this rule:
some are pluralised by -uru, others by -htru.
(Ill) Occurrence of -uru and -kuru with disyllabic and quadrisyllable loans
With regard to canonical nouns, there also are exceptions from the rule that
assigns -kuru to non-trisyllabic nouns. Note that the disyllabic loans that take
-kuru in (111b) have one feature in common: they both contain a heavy
syllable. The same phenomenon is observed with corresponding canonical
nouns in (112). Some of them are monosyllabic or disyllabic and end in a CVV
syllable, while others are disyllabic and begin with a CVV syllable. Thus, it can
be assumed that this property is significant, as also some tonal rules are related
to initial and final heavy syllables (cf. §4.2).
(112) Plural marker -kuru with disyllabic nouns that contain a long vowel
Other cases that deviate from the 3-syllable condition are compounds or
derivational suffixes, such as the word for 'work' (which is a nominalisation
derived from the verb). Each of the examples in (114) to which -kuru is
attached has more than three syllables.
(114) Plural marker -kuru with compounds and long derived words
Otherwise, most nouns that form their plural with -uru have indeed a number of
syllables that are lower or higher than three.
(116) Plural marker -uru with nouns that have less or more than three syllables
a) Monosyllabic nouns:
/kwi-ara/ [kwi.a.ra] 'medicine'-PL
/sa-ara/ [sa.a.ra] 'rat'-PL
b) Disyllabic nouns:
/katga-ara/ [ka.tga.a.ra] 'man'-PL
/ate-ara/ [a.te.a.ra] 'fish'-PL
/tihja-ara/ [ti.hja.a.ra] 'foot'-PL
c) Quadrisyllable nouns:
/tariatga-ara/ [ta.ri.a.tpa.ara] 'yellow spotted river turtle'-PL
/enaniha-ara/ [e.na.ni.hja.ara] 'canoe'-PL
/hanulari-ara/ [ha.no.la.ri.a.ra] 'jaguar'-PL (any wild cat)
While this rule applies to the overwhelming majority of trisyllabic nouns that
end in /i/, there are some exceptions, such as the monosyllabic (CVV)
demonstrative ηίί 'that', which forms its plural in -tguru. (118) lists a few more
exceptions of nouns that are not trisyllabic but still take this plural suffix.
The plural suffix -uru and its allomorphs are also used as plural markers in the
3pi form of verbs, where they precede polarity and person suffixes, among
others (cf. §12.2.12). The conditions regarding their distribution are similarly
complex as the system for noun pluralisation. With monosyllabic roots, only
-uru is used. There is a preference for -uru to occur after disyllabic roots.
(119) Plural marker -uru with monosyllabic and disyllabic verb roots
In contrast, some disyllabic roots take the plural suffix -kuru. The conditions
that underlie this alternation are not predictable.
The form -kuru is also used with most verbs that have a trisyllabic root. In
addition, it is attested with some derived forms. The examples in (121b) show
two examples that contain a reflexive prefix, one case that involves a causative
derivation, and an imperfective form. These examples are so heterogeneous that
it is impossible to make any generalisations about the use of -kuru.
(121) Plural marker -kuru with trisyllabic verb roots and longer forms
a) Trisyllabic roots:
/lenone-tfru-a/ [le.no. ne.kä.rti.ä] 'eat'-PL-Ops/A
/kufwia-uru-e/ [ku.fwi.a.ktt.re] 'felP-PL-3ps/E
/kurete-«rn-e=ln/ [ku.re.te.kü.re.M] 'buy'-PL-3ps/E=REM
In contrast, the examples listed in (122) again demonstrate that -uru is the
preferred suffix with roots that have more than two syllables, some including a
reflexive prefix. This makes it even more difficult to predict the occurrence of
the respective suffix on a certain form.
The last example in (122) though is remarkable: the verbal root / k w a r a / ' s e e '
occurs with the plural allomorph -kuru when the plural directly follows the root,
as was observed in (120). When the continuous aspect suffix -he is attached to
the root, the plural that follows is realised by the suffix -uru. There are a
number of possible factors that may play a role in the assignment of the plural
suffix:
a) The structure of certain roots. Note that huaraa has a few other exceptional
properties regarding its inflection. It could be a lexical exception. However,
this does not directly account for the alternation in the assignment of the
plural allomorph.
b) The number of syllables involved, kioaraa is followed by -kuru as a
disyllabic root, but takes the suffix -uru when three syllables precede. The
problem is that this is exactly against the trend, as trisyllabic roots tend to be
pluralised by -kuru.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Alternations involving /kJ versus no onset on suffixes 97
c) It is possible that certain suffixes block the use of the suffix -htru. In fact,
the continuous suffix -ahe never occurs with -htru.
Thus, one may conclude that the distribution of -uru and -kuru with verbs is
predictable to a very low degree, i.e. for monosyllabic roots. This is the only
context for which there are no examples that involve the suffix -uru. Apart
from this, numerous factors such as length, morpheme structure, and lexical
exceptions seem to play a role in plural assignment, which makes it impossible
to formulate a rule. Regarding the question which allomorph may be the
underlying one, several views are possible. While one may argue that it is more
common to described a shorter allomorph as a reduction of a longer one, the
latter (i.e. -kuru) appears to be more restricted in its occurrence: most typically,
it is used in rather specific environments, e.g. with respect to word length and
after long vowels and vowel sequences, in order to avoid an accumulation of
three vowels, as supported by the analysis of several verbal suffixes in §3.1.3 to
§3.1.6. While these are rather specific contexts, the occurrence of -uru could be
viewed as the default case.
For the occurrence of the allomorph -tg,uru, the situation is different. As one
may predict based on its occurrence with nouns, it is attached only to verbs that
have a specific structure: most importantly, their stem must end with the vowel
/i/ (and [t$] is a result of palatalisation). Thus, -tQuru may be viewed as a
variant of -kuru in a clearly defined phonological environment. Note that I use
the word 'stem' intentionally, as some examples in (123) contain a root plus
other affixes in addition to plural and person marking. In the examples with the
completive marker -si, the stem (i.e. the extended root) ends in i\!. The root for
'hunt' contains the intransitivising prefix m-. Apparently, word length does not
play a role here, as the verbs have between five and six syllables.
Taking into account what was said about the occurrence of -tQuru with nouns,
one may generalise the distribution of the three plural allomorphs as follows:
1. -uru is the unmarked plural form for most nouns and verbs, but rare with
trisyllabic roots.
2. -kuru is used under the following conditions:
a) With most trisyllabic noun and verb roots
The other context in which the suffix -ka is applied is with roots that end in a
sequence of two vowels, as illustrated in (125). It does not play a role whether
the vowels involved are long, short, or diphthongs, as becomes evident: in
kamua-ka 'bathe', two short vowels occur as a sequence, in ubaae-ka 'be
angry', the first vowel is long, in huee-ka 'close', the second vowel is long, and
in kuruae-ka 'be happy', the second vowel is a diphthong.
Note that the -ka suffixation rule does not apply when the root ends in a single
diphthong, rather than in a long vowel or a vowel sequence. Words such as
han-a 'throw' and beelaj-a 'give as a gift' prove this. When a root end in a
single vowel, the 3ps/A suffix also is -a.
When the root ends in a long vowel /ii/, -ka is replaced by -t$a:
In the lsg/A form, verb roots that end in a vowel sequence are realised with the
suffix -käu (instead of the regular -anu). This form is based on the element /ka/,
which was discussed above, and the suffix -w, (which otherwise occurs as the
suffix for lsg/E). These are combined to replace -anu, which again cannot be
used since it is vowel-initial and would thus violate the principle that disallows
three vowels in a row.
(128) lsg/A suffix -kau with verb roots that end in long vowel or vowel sequence
There are a few more verbs which take -käu instead of -anu in order to mark
lsg/A. The difficulty with these verbs is that their classification in terms of
phonological structure is not as straightforward as for the verbs mentioned
above. The only feature that these verbs have in common is that their root ends
in the vowel /a/, but this is also the case for many other verbs that are not
subject to this rule.
Other verb roots ending in /a/ take the regular inflection for lsg/A. Thus, the
verbs listed in (130) can be regarded as exceptions. In addition, verb roots that
end in a vowel other than /a/ also follow the normal pattern.
With some verb roots that end in /e/ or /i/, the lsg/A form is realised as -tgäu.
However, this seems to be lexically prespecified as a comparison of the
examples in (130) and (131) illustrates. While the examples /ari/ 'seek' and
/ere/ 'speak' in (130), receive the suffix -anu for lsg/A, the examples in (131)
differ from that: even though the underlying final root vowel of bajtia and heria
is /e/, as can be proven by other forms (e.g. the participle, which is bajtei, here1,
respectively), they form the lsg/A with -i(sä«. 19 Correspondingly, some verbs
with roots ending in /i/ take this suffix for lsg/A.
Note that most monosyllabic verb roots that end with an underlying /e/ do not
follow this rule. The forms of the copula ni-anu and m-tQäu occur alternatively.
Some trisyllabic roots (and disyllabic roots that contain a long vowel) may
surface with /t^/.
19
Recall that the vowel /e/ always surfaces as /i/ before /a/, as was already observed as a
general phonotactic rule in 2.8.4. This results in the forms ending in [ianu] with the
suffix -anu.
(132) Occurrence of -anu and -tQäu with monosyllabic and trisyllabic verb roots
a) With monosyllabic root:
/ne-anu/ [ni.a.nu] / [ni-tcäö] 'be'-lsg/A
/ te-anu/ [ti.a.na] 'give'-lsg/A
/be-ana/ [bi.a.na] 'tell'-lsg/A
b) With trisyllabic
/kuhjuri-ana/ [ku.hju.ri.t^äa] 'shout/cry'-lsg/A
/nesari-ana/ [ne.sa.ri.tpäa] 'hunt'-lsg/A
/kurete-ana/ [ku.re.ti.t$äa] 'pay'-lsg/A
/kanajte-ana/ [ka.naj.ti.tpaa] 'be sick'-lsg/A
Similar to the alternation for the lsg/A form, all lpl suffixes have allomorphs
beginning with /tp/ when they are directly attached to the root of any verb listed
in (132b). The regular suffixes are -akaanu (lpl/ex), -aka (lpl/du), and -akaatQe
(lpl/in). The alternations with [tp] are illustrated in (133).
Another example for the systematic occurrence of [t£] is in the future tense.
After the tense/irrealis suffix - n , both lsg and 3ps personal suffixes are realised
with an initial [t$]. However, note that there is no assimilation of /k/ to [tp], as
could be expected in forms that involve the 2ps suffix -ki.
As one can conclude from the data presented in this section, a high degree of
idiosyncrasy is involved in the allomorphy of person suffixes that have three
types of alternants: vowel-initial forms (e.g. -anu), forms beginning with [k]
(e.g. -käu), and allomorphs beginning with [tp] (e.g. -tQäu). The following table
exemplifies this with the suffix for lsg/A. In fact, there are only a few contexts
where no variation occurs, i.e. most forms are not predictable. I have indicated
in brackets when a preference in terms of clear statistical tendencies can be
identified. Especially with the final root vowels /e/ and I\I, no predictions can be
made.
There are alternations that affect the shape of the imperative morpheme in some
of these forms, depending on the structure of the verb root and other factors.
The alternation between -u and its allomorphs -ku and -tQU highly depends on
the presence or absence of the plural marker and the distal suffix. For instance,
Several remarks can be made about the factors that are responsible for the
distribution of the imperative allomorphs. It is evident from the transcription
that in addition to this, tonal phenomena are also involved. These will be
discussed in §4.3.
1) The regular imperative suffix is -«. It is attached to a number of verb roots of
different length. They can be monosyllabic, or can have two or three
syllables.
2) When the root-final vowel of a verb is a diphthong whose offglide is [w] or
[«], it is split up before the suffixation of the imperative morpheme. The first
component of the diphthong (which is /a/ in all attested examples) is
lengthened and the offglide merges with the imperative suffix -u. For
instance, the root / k a « / 'return' is combined with -u to result in
[kaa.a.(t$e)].
3) Roots that end in fu/ (also realised as [o], cf. (55)) assimilate the imperative
morpheme, which is then realised as /u/.
4) The use of -ku is more restricted: it does not occur with monosyllabic roots.
Instead, the verbs with which it is typically combined are familiar from the
other alternations that involve [k], as discussed in the previous sections. In
detail, these verbs are of the following structure:
a) Their root ends in a vowel sequence (e.g. huaau-ka, e?eeo-ka), or
b) their root ends with the vowel /e/ (e.g. bajte-a [bajtia]).
c) In addition, the two verbs huara-a and fiintQu-a take the -ku imperative in
combination with the plural marker. The verbs itQa-a and enoala-a can take
it as a possible variant. These could be treated as lexical exceptions (recall
that some exceptional features were already observed for itQaa and hoaraa).
The 2ps suffix -i has an allomorph -ki that occurs under specific conditions. In
particular, it is attested only in combination with the plural -tg,e to surface as
-kitQQ, as opposed to -itQe, which is the standard form. The conditions that
determine the alternation are quite complex and a summary with examples is
given in (138). While the form -itQe for 2pl is the regular one, the alternation
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
A It ernations involving /k/ versus no onset on suffixes 105
with /k/ as -kitQe is again related to the final root vowel of the verb. With a
number of verbs whose final root vowel is /a/, both variants are possible,
depending on speaker preference. However, the majority of verbs of this type
form their 2pl with -itQe only. A similar situation is found with verb roots that
end in /e/: again, some verbs can take both forms, but the majority occurs with
-itQe only. Interestingly, some verbs are not attested with -itQe but only with
-kitQe - this could be a coincidence due to lack of counterexamples (as I
assume), or it is the case that some verbs only occur with the alternant -kitQe.
With verbs that have / « / as their final root vowel, the situation is clearer, as all
but one verb take the form -itQe. With the remaining verbs a peculiarity can be
observed: verb roots that end with l\l always take the 2pl form -itQe. However,
when the 2pl follows the irrealis suffix -ri, it is consistently realised as -kitQe.
Interestingly, also the two verbs whose roots end in /ri/, siiria ' h a v e ' and heria
' w a n t ' , follow the same pattern, even when no irrealis suffix is present. There
are very few verbs whose root ends in /u/, and among these, the preference for
one or the other form is mixed. But when the 2pl form is preceded by the
habitual suffix -reheto, which itself ends in /u/ (realised as [o]), it surfaces as
-kitQe throughout.
Regarding the low degree of predictability for the alternating 2pl form it must
be concluded that it is highly lexically determined, with some phonological and
morphological factors playing a role.
There is another alternation for one group of verbs discussed in the previous
sections: when a verbal root ends in a long vowel or in a vowel sequence.
Before some suffixes, the syllable /he/ is inserted as a stem extension. For
instance, the participle form, which is normally -z, is realised as -hei in
combination with the respective verb roots. In some verbs, the second vowel of
the root-final sequence is deleted before suffixation of -hei. With the verb root
kurnae- in (139), the components /e/ of the diphthong /ae/ is elided.
(139) Stem extension /he/ with the participle form after vowel sequence
Root: / u b a a e / PRT: /ubaa-he-i/ [o.baa.hee.T] 'get.angry'-PRT
Root: / k u r u a e / PRT: /kurua-he-i/ [ku.ru.aa.hee.T] 'be happy'-PRT
This rule also applies to some verbs whose root ends in a diphthong: if the
diphthong ends in /j/ (such as in /aj/; note that there are no verbs whose root
ends in /ej/), the participle form is realised as -hei. With other diphthongs, the
rule does not apply and the regular participle suffix -z is used.
The application of the /he/-insertion rule before the participle form is not
surprising: as -7 is a vowel-initial suffix, one can conclude that the replacement
of a vowel-initial suffix by a consonant-initial suffix functions in order to avoid
a sequence of three vowels in a row. The fact that it also applies to diphthong-
final roots where [j] (underlyingly /i/) is the last element, is plausible, as the
insertion of /he/ avoids a clash between two identical vowels or between /e/ and
/i/.
Verbs with roots ending in a vowel sequence are subject to a few other
alternations regarding their inflection. With a verb such as kuruaeka ' b e h a p p y ' ,
the suffix for 3ps/E is -he instead of -e. Similarly, the suffix lsg/E is realised as
-heü (normally - « ) . Also the negative form involves the insertion of /h/, such as
in -hern instead of -ene with other verbs. Accordingly, the imperative of the
verbs under investigation is realised as -heu rather than -u, as shown in (141).
This type of assimilation is also observed with some suffixes that begin with Irl.
When they follow a root that ends in /i/, the initial consonant of the suffix is
assimilated to [t$], In particular, this applies to the habitual suffix -reheto, and
to the causative suffix. The latter is underlyingly -erate, but the Id is deleted
after vowel-final verb roots, thus leaving -rate. The causative suffix surfaces as
-tpate when the final root vowel is Ii I.
The same palatalisation rule applies when the 2ps proclitic i= is combined with
a word that begins with Irl. Since Urarina has only very few morphemes in
prefixal position (and none of these ends in /i/), only the 2sg clitic for
possession (with nouns), which also functions as the object proclitic (with verbs
and with postposition raj 'for'), has these properties.
However, the sequence HI + Irl is not generally banned from the phonology as is
also attested through numerous examples where this sequence occurs in root-
internal position:
Taking into account the peculiar behaviour of the negative suffix, it can be
concluded that vowel lengthening occurs after specific suffixes, which include
the following: -u for imperative, -ü for 1 sg/E, -uru for plural (nouns and some
verb forms), -i for 3ps negative, -i for 2ps affirmative, and -i for the participle.
The lengthening rule does not apply when a [-high] vowel follows, such as
in the agentive suffix -era: in /itaa-era/ 'do'-AG ('the one who did it') the root-
final /a/ is not lengthened, but merges with the /e/ (cf. 3.4).
Note that the /k/ in last example listed in (147) is predictable from the
allomorphy of 3ps forms that are attached to a verb ending in a vowel sequence
(cf. §3.1.3). Thus, the 3ps/A form for this root is -ka; [ke] is the simplified form
of [kae].
Interestingly, the merging to [e] occurs with some verbs only. With others,
the expected diphthong [ae] is observed. While the conditions for this are not
entirely clear, word length is likely to play a role. The examples in which a final
root vowel /a/ merges to [ae] with a following 3ps/E suffix -e are not disyllabic,
but have monosyllabic roots or roots that have more than two syllables.
However, the low number of examples may not suffice to prove this point.
(148) Combination of 3ps/E suffix -el with preceding /a/ resulting in [ae]
/na-e/ [näe] 'say'-3ps/E
/ha-e/ [häe] 'make'-3ps/E
/ne-rauta-e/ [ne.raa.tae] 'ITR-'heal'-3ps/E
In verb roots that end with Γι/, the final vowel merges with the suffix -e and
results in [i], as illustrated in (149). In contrast to the above forms, this
alternation does not depend on the length of the root. Monosyllabic roots such
as /ki/ ' e a t ' are realised as [ki] in the 3ps/E form, corresponding to longer roots
that end with III as the examples in (149) illustrate.
(149) Combination of 3ps/E suffix -el with preceding root vowel /i/
V e r b roots that end with the vowel /u/ exhibit two different patterns in
combination with -e. O n e type surfaces with an onglide [ w e ] , i.e. the final /u/
(or variant [o]) and the suffix -e are shortened, while the other - exceptional -
type simplifies this combination to [e]. T h e latter form appears to occur only
with verbs w h o s e roots end in /to/, as the examples show. N o t e that this does
not only apply to cases where the final root syllable /to/ is a suffix, but also to
the example /ajto/ ' s a y ' , which does not contain a derivational suffix.
a) After /to/:
/kaua-to-e/ [ka.wa.te] 'be good'-INTS-3ps/E
/beai-to-e/ [be.u.i.te] 'cut'-INTS-3ps/E
/ ajto-e/ [aj.te] 'say'-3ps/E
As a generalisation, the merging rule applies to all suffixes that begin with /e/,
including derivational suffixes and others. Specifically, these are the hortative
suffix -e, the negative suffix -ene, the agentive suffix -era, the privative suffix
-elanaala, and the causative -erate. The examples in (152) illustrate the
regularity with some of these forms. Note that the form beelajtga in (152a) is
the result of palatalisation: first, the /e/ of the agentive suffix -era is elided; the
consonant Irl is then palatalised to [tp], as it follows a diphthong ending in Ν
(cf. §3.2).
An exception from the merging process of root vowels with the 3ps/E suffix -e
is the monosyllabic verb root /«/ 'come'. The root vowel is not elided and thus,
the resulting form is not [uqe] as predicted, but [u.iqe], Note that merging
applies with phonologically similar verbs, given they have a syllable onset. The
3ps/E form of /ku/ ' g o ' is realised as [kiqe], with a single syllable.
As another result of morpheme combination, non-lexical diphthongs may
surface. Most typically, this involves combinations of a vowel-final verb root
with a vowel-initial suffix. One example for this is the combination of a verb
root whose final vowel is /a/ with the nominalising suffix -v. when these
morphemes are combined, the diphthong [aj] emerges (cf. (153a)); with the
locative suffix - u the resulting diphthong is [a«], as shown in (153b)).
However, not all suffixes form a diphthong with a preceding vowel. Some
suffixes coincide with a syllable boundary directly at their left, i.e. a vowel
sequence is created, as was described in §3.3. The participle suffix -7 is an
example for this. In the participle form for 'give', /te-l/ is pronounced [tee.i]
under normal conditions. However, in rapid speech, it can be shortened to [tej],
thus forming a positional or "casual" diphthong (cf. §3.6.1). This effect can
result in the creation of other diphthongs that do not have phonemic status.
Urarina has a few more suffixes that show peculiar behaviour in their
combination with roots. In addition, there is a diphthongisation rule that seems
to apply under even more restricted conditions. While the plural suffix -uru
forms a separate syllable and causes vowel lengthening on the final root vowel
when it is attached to a noun (cf. (146)), its initial vowel /«/ forms a diphthong
with the final root vowel if it occurs in the second noun of a possessive
construction. For instance, the plural of ela 'sleeping mat' is pronounced
[e.laa.urtt] in isolation, but realised as [ka.nti e.laa.ra] in 'my sleeping mats'.
In (154), a summary of combinations with different vowels is illustrated. It is
important to mention that merging does not apply to roots that end in a vowel
sequence or a diphthong. In that case, the suffix will form a separate syllable.
For some regularities it is difficult to determine the domain within which they
apply. As mentioned, this problem occurs for alternations that apply before the
root, as Urarina has only a very small number of morphemes that occur in this
position. More exactly, there are only two types of preverbal morphemes: one is
the set of proclitics, used in object function with verbs and in possessive
function with nouns, and the other is the intransitiviser - the only productive
prefix found in Urarina.20 This section lists a number of rules that apply to
exactly these two kinds of morphemes. On the one hand, it would be possible to
say that this is a morpho-phonological rule, as it applies to these morphemes
only. On the other, the process is more general, as it applies not only to
proclitics, but also to the reflexive prefix.
The velar stop Ik/ is palatalised to form the affricate [t$] when it is preceded by
/i/. One example for this was mentioned before, with the example /i=/ +
/kwerehe/ realised as [itpuerehe] 'your son'. A further example is 'your wife',
where /i=komasaj/ surfaces as [itpuasej] (with the irregularity of /m/ being
elided, which is not systematic). One further example is / i = k u t « r i / [itputttri]
'your head'.
20
The associative prefixes ku- and b- are not productive; cf. §7.3.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Alternations with pre-root elements 115
(156) /s/^[J]
3.5.2 /i/^fdTj
When a proclitic is combined with a vowel-initial root, the vowel of the clitic is
deleted. This applies to proclitics that occur before a verb (where they function
as object proclitics) as well as in prenominal position (in possessive function).
The lsg proclitic ka= loses its vowel /a/, while in the 3ps proclitic ra=, the
vowel /i/ is elided. The same rule is also observed with the intransitivising
prefix ne-, where the vowel Id is elided.
Many words, especially complex adverbs are composed of a root and the
participle suffix -1. When this morpheme is preceded by /e/, the underlyingly
resulting structure /el/ can be modified in different ways, as shown here with the
example mhoaaunel 'again' (lit. 'repeatedly').
a) De-nasalisation to [ej] as in [ n a . k w a a . u . n e j ]
b) Vowel coalescence to [ee] as in [ n a . k w ä a . H . n e e ]
c) Vowel shortening to [e] while nasalisation is retained as [ n a . k w a a . u . n e ]
d) Vowel shortening to [e] as in [ n a . k w a a . n . n e ]
Further examples for this are listed below. As an additional condition, vowel
shortening can only occur in unstressed syllables. Thus, the word kuajtel cannot
be simplified according to variant d).
N o t e that this rule does not apply to the participle form of the derivational suffix
-to, which is realised as -til. Thus, in the form for 'being nice', / k a u a - t n / , the
final syllable is not denasalised.
3.6.3 /e/~[ej]
The vowel Id can be pronounced as [ej] in certain contexts. Even though this
kind of diphthongisation mainly occurs in word-internal position, the exact
conditions for this rule are unclear, as it occurs in a variety of environments, i.e.
in accented or unaccented syllable, in final or non-final position, etc. One
context in which the rule is excluded is when Id is in word-initial position. Its
occurrence in word-final position is probably restricted to the example d^ale
listed below.
(161) Id ~ [ej]
a) Application of rule:
/d3a(e)+le/ [dga.le], [ d j a . l e j ] 'something'
/aheri/ [a.he.ri], [a.hej.ri] 'stone'
/netcara/ [ne.tpa.ra], [nej.tca.ra] 'maybe'
b) N o application:
/ahaane/ [ a h a a n e ] , *[ahaanej] 'ashes'
/atane/ [atane], *[atanej] 'earth'
/elo/ [elo], *[ejlo] 'rain'
/enoto/ [enoto], *[ejnoto] 'sun'
In fast speech, the initial syllable of some very common words or expressions
can be omitted optionally if it does not bear a High tone. The following are
some examples for this.
(164) / n i a / - » [pa]
a) Application of rule:
/nitoane-a / [ni.to.a.ni.ä], [ni.to.a.jiä] 'be like that'-3ps/A
/najne-a/ [naj.ni.ä], [naj.jiä] 'be able'-3ps/A
/amiane-a/ [a.mi.a.ni.ä], ([a.mi.a.jiä]) 'work'-3ps/A
/kurenia/ [ku.re.ni.ä], ([ku.re.jia]) 'for'
b) No application:
/najne-ene-a/ [naj.jie.ni.a], *[naj.jie.jta] 'be.able'-NEG-3ps/A
/kwara-«rn-ene-a/ [kwa.ra.ka.re.ni.a], 'see'-PL-NEG-3ps/A
*[kwa.ra.ku.re.jia]
The phenomena discussed in this section are typical properties of rapid speech.
Further regularities that occur under this condition include the omission of
initial /•/ before /tp/ (cf. §2.1.9) and palatalisation of lx\l to [CI3] (cf. §2.8.6).
1) Single vowels not marked with a diacritic are toneless (i.e. Low-toned).
2) In Η-toned diphthongs, only the first element is marked with a diacritic (i.e.
v w to mean v w , e.g. in ka.naa.naj 'child', the final diphthong is H).
3) On long high-toned vowels [VV], only on the first V is marked with a
diacritic (i.e. v v to mean v v , e.g. in e.na.ma.naa 'young man', the final
syllable is all-H).
4) When the second V unit of a long vowel is High, but the first V is Low, only
the High part will be marked: v v (-> to mean v v , e.g. in hua.raa ' s e e ' , the
final long vowel is LH)
5) Nasalisation is normally marked on the first element of a long vowel: v v
to mean v v ) . Exceptions: see 6)
6) Combinations of High-tone marking and nasalisation:
vv to mean: there is a LH contour on a nasalised long vowel).
x
v v (-> to mean: there is a HL contour on a nasalised long vowel).
v~ to mean: there is a H L contour on a nasalised single vowel),
vw to mean: there is a Η tone on a nasalised diphthong),
v w (-> to mean: there is a LH contour on a nasalised diphthong),
vw to mean: there is a HL contour on a nasalised diphthong).
The Urarina tonal system has a contrast between Η tone, which is lexically
specified, and toneless syllables, which are L(ow) by default. Urarina fits into
Y i p ' s characterisation of a pitch accent language as there is maximally one tone
per morpheme. More than that, this rule can be extended to words that contain
several morphemes and even larger units than that, as will become clear in this
chapter. The tone-bearing unit (TBU) appears to be the syllable at first sight, but
a f e w examples show that under certain circumstances, a syllable may carry
more than one tone. Therefore, it is more precise to define the mora as tone-
bearing unit. Despite the apparent simplicity of the tonal contrast ("tone versus
no tone"), there is a complex system that determines the position of the
respective tone on the units to which it is assigned.
Most words have a Η tone on their final syllable and thus, there are hardly
any minimal pairs that differ from each other only by tone. In fact, the database
contains only one such pair, as shown in (166). The word for ' t o p a tree'
exhibits a Η tone on the second part of the initial long vowel, and Falling (HL)
tone on the final syllable. There are only a f e w nouns of this type and these
clearly deviate from the "one tone per m o r p h e m e " principle just described.
However, most other nouns exhibit a final Η tone (cf. §4.1).
While the vast majority of nouns (and verbs) carry a final Η tone in isolation,
their tonal structure is lexically predetermined in so far as they are responsible
for tone assignment on adjacent words. This is, even though words normally
have a final Η tone, their underlying tonal structure may significantly differ
from that. Nouns can be divided into four tonal classes (called Types A, B, C, D
here) and, depending on the tonal class they belong to, Η tone is assigned to a
particular syllable of the word to the right (cf. §4.Iff). The example in (167)
illustrates this phenomenon with another rare minimal pair: the words for
i
achiote'> (referring to the tree or colour of Bixa orellana L.) and 'urine' have
identical segmental structure and identical prosodic structure on the surface, as
they both surface with a final Η tone in isolation. However, when they are
combined with a verb or an adjective, they cause different effects for the tonal
structure of these: with 'achiote', Η is assigned to the third/second syllable of a
word that follows the noun, whereas with 'urine', Η falls onto the final syllable
of a following word.
a) Nouns in isolation:
hjaane 'achiote (tree)' (Bixa orellana L.) (Type B)
hjaane 'urine' (Type C)
hjaane kiuara-käu
achiote see-lsg/A Ί saw the urine.'
T w o more examples for such underlying tonal differences are recorded with
akano 'snake' (Type B) vs. akano 'daughter-in-law' (Type C) and hajä 'muriaca
caspi tree' (Type A) vs. hajä 'horn' (Type B).
The examples in (167) prove the underlying difference between different
nouns even though they look alike on the surface. In other languages, similar
structures can be explained by floating tones. However, a thorough analysis of
the different tonal classes in this chapter will show that this approach does not
account for the phenomena observed in Urarina. Interestingly, the tone
assignment rules such as introduced above are interrelated with syntactic
structure: as a tendency, each constituent (rather than each word) receives only
one Η tone (cf. §4.2 to §4.5). Another important feature is the existence of
construction-type based tonal patterns that override any underlying tonal
structures, as is discussed in §4.6. It is also shown that a number of bound
morphemes have inherent tonal features that cause deviations from the
regularities observed elsewhere.
The position of the Η tone is predictable for most nouns and the majority of
verbs: it always falls on the final syllable. In contrast, the position of Η is not
predictable for stative and "long" verbs, (i.e. verbs which have four or more
syllables; cf. §4.7.1) and some adverbs (cf. §4.7.3). It should also be mentioned
that the assignment of a Η tone does not generally depend on syllable weight,
even though weight is relevant for certain tonal rules (cf. §4.2; §4.6.1).
While most nouns have a final Η tone in isolation regardless their length or
syllable structure, some loans and a few canonical nouns may deviate from that.
Some of these are recent loans and therefore not stable, i.e. pronunciation can
differ from speaker to speaker (e.g. balde vs. bälde 'bucket': the second variant
is based on the Spanish stress pattern; this form would be used by speakers with
a higher proficiency in Spanish). Nouns of any length keep their final Η tone
when they follow an intransitive verb (in subject position, as in (168)).
a) Disyllabic noun:
suru-ä katQä
run-3ps/A man
'The man runs.'
b) Trisyllabic noun:
kau-a ku.raa.naa
return-3ps/A chief
'The chief returns.'
c) Quadrisyllable noun:
u-ä si.m.he.rä
die-3ps/A spouse
'The spouse died.'
The nouns listed in (169) differ from the general structure as they do not have
their Η tone on the final syllable. Most of these carry a Η tone on the
penultimate syllable; they make up the majority of the nouns that differ from the
"Final H " pattern. A few other nouns exhibit a different pattern: These nouns
have a long vowel in their penultimate syllable, which carries a rising (LH)
(169) Some nouns that differ from the "Final H" pattern
a) Penultimate Η pattern:
aj.tQuM.ri 'giant armadillo'
a.ru.lä.ri 'fox'
ae.ra.na 'pucalupuna tree'
b) Contour pattern:
a.nää.he 'ubos tree'
a.lau.t.hja 'perο caspi tree'
a.loo.n 'panguana bird'
When nouns are followed by a transitive verb (i.e. when they are in object
position), they lose their final Η tone. In turn, the tone pattern of the verb is
changed. The impact nouns have on the tonal structure of the verb makes it
plausible to divide them into four tone classes:
- Type A: triggers an initial Η on a word that follows.
- Type B: triggers Η on the third syllable ("$3")of a word that follows.
- Type C: triggers a final-Η on a word that follows.
- Type D: triggers an All-L pattern on a word that follows.
In this context, where the noun functions as an object of a transitive verb, the
final Η tone of the noun is neutralised for tonal types A, B, and C. Type D
nouns differ from that, as they keep their Η tone; in this case, the verb remains
toneless. The details of tone assignment will be discussed in §4.2.
A verb without an overt object (being transitive or intransitive) has a final Η
91
tone. This structure is replaced by a pattern that is assigned through the object
noun of a transitive verb. A discussion of these patterns follows below.
One remark is in order regarding the frequency of the different noun types,
as illustrated in (170). 22 While Type A clearly is the most frequent one, there are
21
A transitive verb without an overt object refers to a 3ps object, which is typically
unmarked (cf. §18.1).
22
The total of 649 is based on 700 underived canonical nouns, including a few long-
established loans (also cf. table (1) in §5.1). However, for 51 nouns the tonal type
was not identified.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Tonal structure of nouns \ 25
fewer examples of the other types. The least frequent type is Type D, which can
be split into four separate subtypes, depending on further differences in tonal
structure.
Since the membership to the tonal classes A to D is partly based on word length
and syllable structure (as will become clear later), an analysis of the word
structure is essential. The crucial distinction between Type A and Β nouns is
that quadrisyllable (or longer) nouns are typically members of Group A, but
never of Group Β (however, note that longer nouns may also fall into Group C
or D). Apart from this, it is not possible to distinguish Type A and Β nouns
based on word length. Both groups contain disyllabic nouns of different kinds:
CV.CV, CV.CVV, and CVV.CV (with C being optional in all cases). 23 The
tables in (171) to (173) list nouns in their form as preceding a verb, i.e. the noun
surfaces toneless for Types A, B, and C. Also note that there are no disyllabic
nouns that belong to Type D, apart from one exception (aari Ίορα tree'
mentioned in (166)).
In contrast to the nouns listed above, trisyllabic members are found for all tonal
types, as shown in (172).
23
I list this distinction here as it is relevant for some rules to be discussed in sections
4.2, 4.6.1, and 4.6.2. For nouns that have more than two syllables, the distinction is
not relevant.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
126 Tone
A distinction between Type A and Β is impossible for about 80% of all nouns
(estimate). As mentioned above, words that contain more than three syllables
are not found in Group B. Type C nouns can be of any length.
One generalisation about Type D nouns is that they have at least three
syllables. 24 However, many quadrisyllable examples are no different from Type
A members; therefore, the number of syllables alone is not a satisfactory
criterion to predict the membership to a tonal class. One aspect that may
function as an indicator for Type D nouns is that proper nouns such as the ones
for 'Airico River' and 'Espejo River' are found in this class. Similarly, many
loans that have more than two syllables belong to Type D. In addition, many
compound nouns exhibit a tonal structure of Type D. In the present discussion, I
will restrict the analysis to simple nouns.
24
The noun enamanaa 'young man' also has the variant naamanaa.
predicting the effect a noun has on the tonal structure of a verb, taking into
account statistical frequency.
1. If a noun has four (or more syllables), it is likely to follow Type A (i.e. it will
assign an initial-Η tone to a following verb).
2. If a noun has less than four syllables, it is likely to follow Type B. However,
this does not account for the high number of Type A nouns that have less
than four syllables.
3. Type C nouns may be of any length, but typically are trisyllabic or longer.
4. Type D nouns typically have 3, 4 or more syllables.
From this, one can conclude that the membership to tone class A or Β is hardly
predictable (except for "long" nouns). All four tonal types are also represented
in the set of free personal pronouns, as is shown in (174).
4.2 Verb Phrase: effects of nouns on the tonal structure of the verb
Each of the four noun types assigns a different tone pattern to a verb following
it. The respective tonal melody is superimposed to the final-Η structure of the
verb in isolation. In all four patterns, only one Η tone is realised within the
entire verb phrase (VP):
- Type A nouns consistently assign a Η tone to the initial syllable of the verb
(and the noun is toneless, i.e. All-L).
- Type Β nouns are realised All-L, but their effect on the verb turns out to be
more complicated; it will be discussed below.
- Type C nouns (realised All-L) occur with a final-Η tone on the verb. This
pattern is identical to the one found on the verb in isolation.
- Type D nouns consistently bear a Η tone, most typically on the last syllable.
However, no Η tone is assigned to the verb in this context.
The main difficulty is in describing the tonal pattern Type Β nouns trigger on
the verb. In general, they assign a Η tone to the third syllable of the verb, as
shown with obana in (175). As a complication, this is only valid if a verb has
"more than three" syllables. If a verb has exactly three syllables, the Η tone is
assigned to the penultimate (= second) syllable. However, with words that have
"something more" than three syllables in that their final syllable is heavy (VV
or CVV), the rule "H on third syllable" again applies: for, instance, even though
[ k w a . r ä a . i ] 'he has not seen it' has three syllables, its last syllable is light (V);
therefore, tone assignment follows the pattern for trisyllabic verbs (cf. (178a)).
The according structure is illustrated with the trisyllabic verb heria in (176a). In
contrast, the verb form [ru.a.kaa] (cf. (176b)) shows that the Η tone is assigned
to the third syllable of a trisyllabic verb if the last syllable is heavy.
If a verb has two syllables only, the Η tone is assigned to the second (= last)
syllable (cf. (177b)). If the verb is monosyllabic, it still receives a Η tone, as
shown in (177a). Verbs that follow Type D nouns are exempt from this rule, as
predicted.
Further forms to exemplify the predicted patterns are given in the table in (178).
In each example, the tonal structure of the verbs follows the predicted rules for
the respective tone class of the noun that precedes, with a range of different
derivational and inflectional suffixes regardless the length of the verb. Even on
verbs with eight syllables, a Η tone is only observed on the first syllable after
Type A nouns. Similarly, the entire verb is L-toned after Type D nouns. Recall
that in these combinations, Type D nouns carry a Η tone on their final syllable.
b) Types C and D
Syll. Gloss Verb after Type C Verb after Type D
reemae 'dog' enamanaa 'young man'
3 'see'-NEG:3ps/A hoa.ra.i hoa.ra.i
4 'see'-lpl/ex hva.ra.kaa.m kiua.ra.kaa.nu
5 'want'-PL-NEG-3ps/A he.re.kn.ru.1 he.re.ku.ru.i
6 'kill'-CAUl-lpl/ex sioe.ra.ti.a.kaa.nu sioe.ra.ti.a.kaa.nu
7 'know'-CAU 1 -1 sg/A kzoi.tn.k"-e.ra.ti.-a.nu
8 'kill'-DSTR-PL-IRR-
sit.a.kioa.u.ru.ri.tqa.T sit.a.kioa.u.ru.ri.t^a.l
3ps/A=ASS
4.3 Suffixes that cause deviations from the predicted tone patterns
It should be noted that some derivational or inflectional suffixes that are part of
the verb cause deviations from the patterns illustrated in the previous section.
However, the division into four tone classes for nouns is still practical and
suffices to state the general rules for tone assignment for at least two reasons:
1) There is a wide range of suffixes with different functions that can occur
within a verb without altering the predicted tonal pattern.
2) The rules apply regardless the length of a verb. Where this is not possible
(for instance when the rule "H tone on the third syllable" cannot apply
because the verb is shorter than that), additional rules with very specific
conditions apply. This includes verbs that have three syllables where their
final syllable is light (i.e. (C)V).
The rules sketched in §4.2 are challenged by some examples that involve the
lsg person suffix -anu. As shown in (179), the predicted tone patterns apply to
constructions that involve Type C and Type D nouns when followed by a verb:
after the Type C noun reemae 'dog', all verbs are realised with a final Η tone;
after enamanaa 'young man' (Type D), the verb is toneless. But irregularities
are observed on verbs that follow the two other tonal types: after a Type A noun
such as katQa 'man', the initial Η tone occurs on some verbs, but not on all. As
shown in (179), with 'send' and 'throw' the Η tone is on the first syllable of the
person suffix (-anu); with several other verbs (e.g. 'scold', 'exceed'), Η falls on
the second syllable rather than on the predicted first syllable. In contrast, the
expected tonal pattern is observed with the verb for 'know'. The pattern
assigned by Type Β nouns such as akano 'snake' also differs from the predicted
pattern "H on third syllable" with some forms: while it follows this rule with the
verbs for 'send', and 'scold', it is on the second syllable with 'throw' and on the
fourth syllable with 'exceed' and 'know'. However, it should be noted that,
except with 'exceed', the Η tone falls on the first syllable of the suffix again,
just as with 'send' and 'throw' after Type A nouns.
From these data, it is apparent that the suffix -anu causes special tonal effects.
However, it is difficult to analyse these as unfailing rules due to the fact that
they are neither consistent with all verbs, nor with all tonal types.
The complexity of the tonal behaviour of the lsg/A suffix -anu is also
demonstrated by some verb forms that involve several suffixes, when the verb
occurs in isolation. In this case, a default final-Η pattern would be expected (cf.
§4.7.1), but this does not reflect the actual forms. As shown in (180), the Η tone
consistently falls on the first syllable of the suffix -anu.
Further deviations from the regular patterns can be observed with the imperative
form. It consists of the 2ps imperative suffix -u (or allomorphs), which can be
preceded by the distal suffix -ni and followed by the plural suffix -tge (cf.
§3.1.5). In (181), the attested tonal patterns with the plural form and the distal
form are displayed. These represent the forms when the verb occurs in isolation;
thus, tonal changes triggered by a preceding noun could not apply. However,
the existing patterns are rather complex even in this context.
(182) Tone patterns of imperative forms for plural and distal plural
It is difficult to recognise a consistent pattern from the above forms, apart from
the fact that verbs that follow a Type D noun behave as predicted, i.e. they are
toneless. Some verbs have a Η tone on their first syllable when following a
Type A noun, but others considerably differ from that. In a similar way, the
effects of Type Β nouns on verbs is hardly recognisable. When a verb is
preceded by a Type C noun, again, there is a range of different patterns on
different verbs.
When the distal suffix -ni is inserted into the verb form (cf. (184)), some of
the changes tend to become more systematic in that tone patterns appear to be
inherent to specific verbs: the verb for 'kill', for example, still follows the
regular pattern, with or without the distal suffix. Similarly, the verbs for ' c a t c h '
and ' b u y ' keep their Η tone on the same syllable when the distal form is
inserted. However, the verb for 'give' changes its pattern. When a verb with the
distal imperative plural is preceded by a Type Β noun, the Η tone is always on
the penultimate syllable (the suffix -u). The examples for verbs preceded by a
Type C noun vary with respect to their tone pattern. Only Type D nouns trigger
the predicted effect on the verb, as was also observed without the distal form.
(184) Tone patterns of distal imperative plural forms preceded by noun (verb with
DSTL-IMP-PL form)
If the tonal structure of a noun is responsible for tone assignment on a verb that
follows the noun, it could be expected that the same effects also occur with
other word classes that follow the respective noun. This is indeed the case with
adjectives. (Note that most words that function as adjectives in Urarina are
derived, or they are nouns in modifier position, cf. §5.4.) Words that function as
adjectives typically occur in postnominal position. When a noun precedes an
adjective, again, most nouns lose their final Η tone and are realised with an All-
L pattern (except for Type D nouns). Parallel to verbs, the tone pattern on the
A number of adjectives have a special inherent tonal structure that is not subject
to any changes triggered by a noun that precedes the adjective. These are listed
in (186). As a peculiarity, the words natQasiße and kauatga follow the Type D
pattern, but three other adjectives keep their tone after any type of noun.
natQasiße also follows the pattern triggered by Type C nouns, but has a stable
tone after Type A and Β nouns.
Postpositions behave in a similar way as adjectives. While they all have a final
Η tone in isolation, they are subject to tonal alternations when preceded by a
noun. In (187), only a few examples are given. Type C and Type D nouns are
unproblematic as they consistently assign their tonal pattern to all postpositions.
Type A nouns assign a Η tone to the first syllable of ajßa, kahe, a n d kolane, but
to the second syllable of kurenia and kuane (such as if the first syllable were
extrasyllabic). Type Β nouns behave as predicted, as they assign a Η tone to the
final syllable of disyllabic postpositions, but a Η to the penultimate syllable of
trisyllabic postpositions. The quadrisyllable kurenia receives a Η on the third
syllable.
Deviations from the regular tonal patterns are also found with a few other
postpositions, but these will not be discussed here.
There are some environments in which the predicted four patterns for nouns do
not match the previously established patterns, at least not at first sight. Possible
explanations for this include extrasyllabicity, tonally prespecified suffixes, and
possibly some lexical exceptions, as described above. It is also not uncommon
for tone languages to replace ("override") the underlying tonal structure of
words with a consistent tonal melody under certain conditions. Typically, such
melodies are associated with particular grammatical constructions. The
possessive construction in Urarina is an example of this.
Nouns that function as a possessor and precede another noun (the possessum),
trigger a certain tone pattern to occur on a following noun in a possessive
construction. This also applies to constructions where a pronoun has possessor
function (on possessive constructions, cf. §7.1). The possessor, (which has a
final-H tone in isolation), is realised with an All-L pattern, similar to nouns
occurring before a transitive verb. The tones on the noun that functions as a
possessum (in second position), changes according to a specific pattern. The
examples given in (188) involve the lsg pronoun kanu 'my' as a possessor
(recall that this pronoun is a Type A noun from a tonal perspective, cf. (174)).
Interestingly, the effect that kanu would normally have on a word that follows
(i.e. to assign a Η tone to the first syllable), is neutralised. Instead, the tonal
structure of the possessed noun largely depends on its length and syllable
structure: disyllabic nouns of Types A, B, and C receive a Η tone on their initial
syllable when they function as possessum. However, when a disyllabic noun
ends in a long vowel or in a diphthong, it is regarded "more than disyllabic" and
automatically is assigned a Η tone otherwise found with trisyllabic or longer
nouns. This is an intriguing feature, which matches the analysis suggested for
Type Β nouns; recall that a Η tone is assigned to the third syllable of trisyllabic
verbs only if the final syllable is heavy (cf. (178)).
Trisyllabic or longer nouns of Types A, B, and C follow a common pattern:
they receive a Η tone on the second syllable. It is plausible to characterise tone
assignment to the second, not penultimate syllable, since this also applies to
quadrisyllable nouns of all types.
As shown in (189), Type D nouns deviate from these tone assignment rules:
trisyllabic Type D nouns get a Η tone on their first syllable, whereas nouns with
more than three syllables receive a Η tone on the second syllable.
The examples given in (188) and (189) all involve the l s g pronoun kanu, but
the word-length dependent patterns described above are not specific to
possessive pronouns. When full nouns function as possessor, the same tonal
pattern applies: the possessor noun is L-toned, whereas the possessed noun
receives an "initial-Η" or a "H on $ 2 " pattern, according to its length.
It can be concluded that the word length-based patterns are a feature of the
possessive construction in general. However, this only applies to possessive
constructions in juxtaposition, as described above. When the 3ps possessive
marker raj is involved (cf. §7.1.2), the possessor noun is L-toned, raj itself
bears a Η tone, and any possessum of Type A, B, or C receives a final Η tone
regardless its length.
With Type D nouns, the pattern is different, as the Η tone is found on the
penultimate syllable of the possessum.
Urarina has an alternative way to mark possession for a certain group of words
(cf. §7.4). These forms represent a class of formerly inalienable nouns and had
an obligatory proclitic indicating possession. Typically, the nouns found with
such clitics represent kinship terms and body parts. 25 The interesting fact lies in
the tonal structure of nouns preceded by a proclitic: they consistently have a
final-Η tone, which makes them indistinguishable from underived nouns in
isolation. One may conclude from this that the proclitic is regarded a part of the
Phonological Word and therefore has no impact on the tonal structure.
25
These forms are being abandoned in the innovative language. Younger speakers
prefer the construction with a possessive pronoun + noun. However, note that vowel-
initial nouns have kept a 3ps proclitic /n/ in citation form (cf. §7.1.3).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
140 Tone
syllable, as shown in (194). The tonal type is not a relevant factor in this case,
as Type D nouns behave in the same way as other types. The adjective that
follows the noun receives an All-L pattern.
One can conclude that the pattern "H on second syllable" is the regular melody
applied to all nouns in possessive constructions, including any suffixes or
elements belonging to the same syntactic phrase. The fact that in "simple"
possessive constructions, disyllabic nouns receive an initial-Η tone, could be
regarded as a mechanism that applies in case of syllable shortage (i.e. not
enough syllables for a pattern to be assigned), as was observed with verbs
before. An enigmatic aspect of this is that there is no obvious reason why a Η
tone could not be assigned to the second syllable of a disyllabic word:
apparently one "needs Three in order to count up to Two".
Regarding the "order" of tone assignment in this context, the rules applying
to noun-adjective constructions are neutralised in favour of the possessive
construction.
In the previous sections it has been illustrated that on the basis of tonal classes
for nouns, syntactic phrases which involve a noun have a largely predictable
tonal structure. Most typically, there is one Η tone per constituent and its
position depends on the tonal class of the noun which precedes a verb,
adjective, or postposition. The verbs involved in verbal phrases analysed so far
were transitive. In §4.7.1, I will discuss different tonal types for verbs.
Comparable to the tonal structure of Type D nouns, there are some verbs that
appear to be lexically prespecified for tone, i.e. they deviate from the final-H
pattern. In §4.7.2, it will be shown that a clause with an overt noun subject
contains more than one tone. I then analyse the tonal peculiarities in a few
selected constructions such as clauses that involve adverbs (§4.7.3), focus
constructions (§4.7.4) and serial verbs (§4.7.5). There is a range of further
contexts that also exhibit special tone patterns, such as infinitive constructions,
subordinate clauses, participles, nominalisations, and sentences with introducer.
These involve a set of complex peculiarities, which will not be discussed here.
It should also be noted that, while certain principles can be identified, the
generalisations made here are tentative at the present stage.
Nearly all transitive verbs have a final Η tone when they are in isolation or
when they are followed by a subject noun. Note that a 3ps object of a clause is
usually not marked, i.e. a zero object is automatically understood as 3ps
pronominal referent. The examples in (196) show two transitive verbs with zero
objects; both are realised with a final Η tone, as is the subject. The tonal class of
the noun that functions as a subject does not play a role, since the tone
assignment rules apply from left to right, as observed in previous sections.
a)
kwituku-ä katQä
know-3ps/A man
'The man knows him.'
b)
su-uru-ä itgauena-urü
kill-PL-3ps/A elder-PL
'The elders killed it.'
Some intransitive verbs and most stative verbs behave differently f r o m that. A
f e w transitive verbs that contain the intensifying derivational suffix -to, also
deviate f r o m the regular Final-Η pattern for verbs. There are three main tone
classes for verbs. As a general principle, most of the verbs that do not follow the
Final-H pattern, have more than three syllables and typically end in /ia/ or /oa/
(but note that these are not suffixes). The fact that only "long" verbs have a
tonal structure that shows up on the surface in some way corresponds to the
behaviour of Type D nouns as most of these are "long" also. Each group carries
a Η tone on a different syllable:
Type 1: Η on final syllable
Type 2: Η on penultimate syllable, but L on last
Type 3: H-H pattern on the last two syllables (infrequent)
(197) "Long" verbs (in isolation) (Final-L on Type 2 verbs is marked for convenience)
a) Type 1: Final H:
a.haa.to.ä 'be warm'
e.lo.a.to.ä 'be bitter'
a.mu.ri.to.ä 'exceed'
b) Type 2: Penultimate H:
kal.ta.to.a 'be difficult'
ka.wa.to.ä 'be good'
ka.sa.ti.ä 'scare'
These tonal patterns remain stable when the verb functions as the predicate of a
clause (such as 'it is green') and when a noun subject follows. In the following
example, all elements carry the same tones as in isolation.
In addition to the three most common types of tonal patterns on verbs, some
affixes can have specific effects on the tonal structure of verbs. One example for
this are the derivational suffix -hiohwa (and allomorphs, cf. §10.2.2), which
itself carries a Η tone on the syllable /hi/ (or variant [si]), as shown in (199a).
Another is the intransitivising prefix ne-, which assigns a Η tone to the
penultimate syllable of most verbs, such as illustrated in (199b). When a long
vowel represents the final syllable, it is realised as a falling (HL) tone.
b) Intransitiviser ne-:
ne.hve.ra.ja 'care for oneself
ne.rau.tää 'get healthy'
ne.be.ta.kää 'relax'
An aspect that needs further investigation regards the tonal structure of Type D
nouns when following a verb from Types 2 or 3. In this case, the pattern on the
noun changes, as exemplified in (200), where the Η tone on the noun is on the
penultimate syllable followed by a falling (HL) tone on the long final syllable.
As already indicated in the previous section, the tonal distribution "One Η per
constituent" is largely retained within a clause. This also applies to simple
sentences with the regular subject-final constituent order (VS or OVA; cf. §18),
where full nouns are present as arguments. In (201b), the object of the verb is a
Type A noun; thus, the verb gets its Η tone on the first syllable. Otherwise, the
Verb Phrase (VP) does not have other Η tones. Another Η tone is only found on
b) OVA order:
enejtgu hoara-a katga
[monkey see-3ps/A] [man]
[VP] [NP]
'The man saw the monkey.'
A different tonal structure applies when object and subject are syntactically
more complex than the examples above. In (202), the object consists of a
possessive construction with an adjective ('my small bag') and the subject is
composed of a noun and an adjective. In this case, the object NP as well as the
verb receive a Η tone. The subject NP bears a Η tone by rule, as predicted
above.
Examples such as discussed above demonstrate once more that the tonology of
Urarina is subject to an intriguingly complex system of rules. Further studies are
necessary in order to explore all the alternations also for contexts not
investigated here.
Most adverbs have a final Η tone, but there are a few that exhibit a different
tone pattern.
The intensifier [ha.ta.Y] 'very', can precede or follow a verb. Syntactically and
morphologically it behaves like an adverb. In both preverbal and postverbal
position, it does not have any impact on the tonal structure of the verb, and it is
not modified itself.
(208) Focus construction with transitive verb and noun object (AOV order)
Urarina serial verb constructions typically consist of two verbs and their
combination is restricted. While verb 1 can be of almost any type and appears in
the "neutral" form (identical to the citation form), verb 2 usually is represented
by 'go' or 'come' (cf. §17.2). In approaches to describing the characteristics of
serial verb constructions, it is usually assumed that these represent a single
phonological unit (e.g. a phonological word). This is clearly not the case in
Urarina, if we assume that a phonological word has only one Η tone - at least
this has been demonstrated so far for the "regular" patterns. In Urarina serial
verbs, each verb carries a Η tone, as is illustrated in (209). In (209a), where verb
1 is intransitive, both verbs receive a Η tone on their final syllable. With
transitive verbs as verb 1, the verb pattern follows the regular principles for tone
assignment: with a Type A noun as object (as in (209b)), a Η tone goes to the
first syllable of verb 1. In contrast, Type Β nouns trigger a Η tone on the third
syllable of verb 1 (cf. (209c)). Verb 2 receives a final Η tone in all three cases.
However, the examples in (209) show only very short forms of verb 2. When
the verbs 'go' or 'come' occur with one or several suffixes that make it at least
trisyllabic, the Η tone is found on the penultimate syllable. Note that suffixes
which trigger special tonal patterns may cause deviations from that (cf. §4.3).
The difference in tone assignment between the four different tone classes
proposed for nouns runs through this description of Urarina tone like a red
thread. Summarised in a simplified way, the respective tonal types of nouns
have the following effects on a word that follows.
Type A surfaces all-L and assigns an initial-Η tone to a word that follows.
Type Β surfaces all-L and assigns a Η tone to the third syllable of a word that
follows.
Type C surfaces all-L and assigns a final Η tone to a word that follows.
T y p e D contains a Η tone but does not assign a Η tone to a word that follows.
In isolation, nearly all nouns and most words of other classes have a final Η
tone in common. It is plausible to characterise this as the default pattern for
Urarina words: whatever underlying structure a word may have is neutralised
when the word occurs in isolation. However, one has to remember that some
words have an underlying tone pattern that differs from this: some adverbs
exhibit different patterns and a number of verbs have tonal structures that do not
match the default pattern. Therefore, it must be assumed that some words have a
lexically prespecified, stable tone.
Type D nouns appear the easiest to account for. In some way, the Η tone of
Type D nouns resists most (though not all) patterns that are superimposed to
any words that follow it. One could conclude that these nouns have lexically
specified stable tones; these change only in certain constructions. If we assume
that each syntactic constituent has only one Η tone and if this Η tone is already
assigned to the noun, any following word will be L-toned by rule. T w o further
aspects support the idea of Type D nouns being lexical exceptions: firstly, the
fact that the number of Type D nouns is smaller than that of other types, and
secondly, the fact that this group hosts most loans and proper nouns. A similar
approach can be applied to verbs and adjectives which have a "stable" tone.
Type C nouns very consistently follow their pattern. One possibility to
account for the tonal structure they trigger on a following word simply is to
assume that they are underlyingly toneless and therefore have no impact on any
word that follows them. In constructions that involve more than a word, one Η
tone must be assigned to a syntactic constituent. The result, which involves
lowering of the nouns plus a Η tone on the final syllable of the second element,
represents a realisation of the default rule: if no Η tone is assigned through
underlying structures, a default final-H tone will be assigned.
Type A nouns are the most frequent type in the lexical database. The fact
that a Η tone is consistently assigned to the first syllable of a word that follows
might indicate that these nouns have an underlyingly final Η tone. Since it is
suppressed by syntactic restrictions (e.g. "Assign the Η tone to the second
element of a constituent"), it shifts to the adjacent syllable to the right.
The most challenging group of nouns is represented by Type B. For these, it
is possible to establish a tone assignment rule that places a Η tone on the third
syllable of a word that follows the noun. However, it is difficult to characterise
this regularity as a plausible tonal rule. Certainly, it is not a spreading rule, as
the first two syllables following the noun are unaffected. Why would a Η tone
shift to the third syllable of a word, and, especially, how? To complicate things
even further, one can only "count" up to the third syllable (from left to right) if
more segmental material follows (i.e. a mora or a syllable, cf. (188)). And why
is syllable structure significant only in certain positions, such as in the above
example, at the end of a following word? Regarding Type Β nouns, these
questions remain unanswered at this stage.
It is evident that the tentative account given here is subject to speculations on
the underlying tonal structure of Urarina nouns. A deeper analysis that takes
into account all the regularities and the numerous deviations from these will be
indispensable. In further studies of Urarina tone, one should also take into
account the close relation between tone and syntax. In the introduction to this
chapter, I proposed that possibly each syntactic constituent, rather than each
word, has a single Η tone. In fact there is a tendency for many constructions to
follow this regularity, but some modifications to the claim will be necessary.
The division into word classes such as nouns, adjectives and verbs, is not
always straightforward in Urarina. Some words that are intuitively assumed to
be adverbs, conjunctions, or elements of other categories (from their semantic
content) happen to be inflected as verbs. Linguists typically distinguish between
lexical and functional classes. From a cross-linguistic perspective, the first type
usually includes nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs in underived form, which
are discussed in §5.1. to §5.4. In most languages, these are open classes, i.e.
new words can be added to them, whereas the functional classes are typically
closed. In Urarina, the classes of adverbs and adjectives are underrepresented -
more exactly, they have only few underived members. The small group of
underived adverbs represents a closed class. However, the creation of adverbs is
possible through derivation with the participle form (cf. §5.3). In contrast,
ideophones appear to form an open word class along with nouns and verbs.
Verbs mainly function as the head of a (transitive or intransitive) clause, but
in derived form, they can have several noun-like functions through
nominalisation; when a verb is derived by the participle form, it also functions
as a verbal modifier. N o u n s function as the nominal head, as copula
complement, as an argument of a postposition, or as a noun modifier in certain
isolated cases (cf. §5.1.3). The basic relations between the major word classes
and functional slots are summarised in table (211). Note that adjectives are not
listed here, since they do not represent a homogeneous class in Urarina (cf.
§5-4).
There are some other sets of words that are often associated with separate word
classes in other languages, but which are subtypes of nouns in Urarina. These
include some pronouns (cf. §5.5), demonstratives (cf. §5.6), and some numerals,
as will be shown in §5.12.
5.1 Nouns
The vast majority of Urarina nouns have either two or three syllables, but
quadrisyllable nouns are not uncommon, while nouns with five syllables are
exceptional. This also applies to monosyllabic nouns, which are a small
minority.
N o u n s can be marked for number, possession, and location (in some cases). The
unmarked form of a noun is the singular, which corresponds to the root and
which also functions as the citation form. Plural is marked by the suffix -uru,
which has the allomorphs -kuru and -tQuru. The alternation between these
f o r m s is partly predictable, as discussed in §3.1.1. In summary, trisyllabic nouns
tend to be pluralised with -kuru, but with -tg,uru if these end in /i/, while most
of the rest receive the suffix -uru. On the one hand, plural marking is optional
and can be omitted if the context implies plurality (cf. §8.7). On the other hand,
also nouns that are normally uncountable can receive a plural marker. In this
case, the meaning of 'different kinds o f is indicated, such as with ' w a t e r ' ,
akau-uru, (which means 'waters', i.e. rivers, creeks etc). Similar examples for
this are illustrated in (213).
Ν subclass With DEM With adj. Function Take Take LOC Head of
modifier as modif. plural suffix POSS
Standard Ν yes yes no yes place/person yes
reference
Locational Ν yes yes some some yes some
Relational Ν as argument no no no no no
Proper Ν yes yes yes person yes no
names
Adjectival Ν yes (n/a) yes yes no yes
Pers. pronouns no no no 3pl only no no
Demonstratives (n/a) yes yes yes yes no
In the traditional language, some nouns are combined with possessive proclitics
for 1st and 2 nd person singular (cf. §5.5). Even though this kind of cliticisation is
being lost in the contemporary language, the possessive marking tends to be
preserved for kinship terms and body parts, which points towards a system in
which inalienable possession used to play a role. (Note that some nouns are
subject to phonological changes in their root when prefixed, but the data
available on the traditional language does not suffice in order to make
generalisations.) Possession for lsg is marked by the proclitic ka= and by i= (or
alternant d$=, cf. §3.5.2) for 2sg, as illustrated with kinship terms in (215).
A more detailed analysis of nouns that can take a proclitic instead of a full
possessive pronoun is given in §7.4.
The suffixation o f - « is exemplified with some words in (217). Note that this
suffix merges with the final vowel of the preceding syllable (cf. §3.4).
Note that the noun bahi-tQuhwa literally means 'place to defecate' and is
composed of 'defecate' plus a derivational suffix -ruha, which also occurs with
'urinate'. While this suffix is not productive otherwise, it appears to mark
locative nominalisation. In order to form a similar construction with other verbs,
the suffix -naha preceded by the nominaliser -naa is used, such as in
lenom-ma-naha ('eat'-NOM-PURP) 'place to eat'.
Nouns occurring with the locative suffix -« are typically found in
constructions that involve the copula or a motion verb. (Note that the noun
ahaenaa 'forest' (cf. (218b)) has an irregular form with -nu.) Without the
locative marker, the reading of the example 'He/she/it is in the jungle' (cf.
(218a)) changes to 'It is the jungle'. With motion verbs, suffixation of -u with a
limited number of nouns appears to be obligatory as well (cf. (218d)).
a) With copula:
nuna-u=te tie
mountain-LOC=FOC be:3ps/E
'He is in the (high) jungle.'
Urarina possibly has a few more Iocational nouns, which occur with -u, but
their number is not known. The locative marker cannot be attached to nouns
that refer to a geographical location where one "cannot exist" (e.g. with beru
'way'). Also nouns like 'house' are ruled out as they do not denote a
geographical location.
In addition to the set of nouns listed above, Urarina has a number of
relational nouns that never take the locative marker. These may be characterised
as describing part-whole relations.
Some of these relational nouns (edaa, akatia, auania, ahaa) must take an
argument, which can be a full noun or the 3ps proclitic n=. They may differ
from each other with respect to their compatibility with the locative marker -u
and the co-occurrence with the postposition ke (listed in (216)).
Further examples for each relational noun follow below. There are two
relational nouns that refer to 'outside', each of them used with different nouns.
The relational noun edaa is used to describe the position of something outside
an object that does not have a roof or cover. This includes containers like
'glass', but is also used with beru ' w a y ' to mean ' o f f the track'. The word edaa
cannot be combined with the locative marker - u and it is not used with the
postposition he. Note that the word is realised as udaa in the Tigrillo dialect.
a)
nii baja-te beru edaa eno-1
that after=FOC way outside enter-PRT
'After that, entering [the area] outside the track ...'
b)
na1 nuse edaa ku-akaanu, nukue auania ku-t
over.there town outside go-lpl/ex river edge go-PRT
"We went out of the city, going by a river side.' [NT: Acts 16:13]
ajrima 'outside'
In contrast to edaa, the word ajrinia refers to 'outside' of an object that has a
roof or cover. It typically takes words such as ' h o u s e ' or ' s h e d ' as an argument,
but is also found with 'shade' (which makes sense if the tree that gives shade is
understood as a kind of cover). It is not combined with -u or he. Ajrima also
refers to the rectangular spot in front of or around the house that is kept free
from grass. While it can optionally co-occur with a noun, it does not take a
nominal argument.
a)
lureri ajrinia=te ne
house outside=FOC be:3sg/E
'It is outside the house.'
b)
hi ajrinia hetau kioajtel babaaku-ure
there outside HRS again be.sitting-3pl/E
'Again they were sitting outside.'
This noun always occurs with an argument. It is not combined with - u or with
he.
a)
lureri akatia
house next.to
'in front of the house'
b)
n^akatia launeto-a u-e hanulari
3ps=next.to be.sitting-3ps/A come-3ps/E jaguar
'The jaguar came to sit down in front of him.'
auama 'edge'
T h e w o r d auarua refers to ' e d g e ' or ' m a r g i n ' and needs an argument. It is not
compatible with -u or ke.
a)
n=auania
3ps=edge
'at its edge'
b)
nemuri auania turu-1 ku nelaurja-1 lauek-e
lake edge arrive-PRT there sit.down-PRT be.sitting-3ps/E
'He arrived at the edge ( = shore) o f the lake, sat down and was sitting there.'
(a)haa 'left side' is another relational noun that takes an argument. Frequently,
the 3ps proclitic n= precedes this noun. In an alternative form o f ahaa, the
initial /a/ is elided. The corresponding word for 'right (side)' is rautono, which
also refers to 'peace'. An important difference between the two words is that
(a)haa always co-occurs with the word bihi 'hand'. This is not the case for
rautono, which is rarely combined with bihi (but one example is attested in the
NT). Both relational nouns can be followed by the word nitQahaj for 'side'.
They also may co-occur with the postposition ke, but are not compatible with - « .
b) ahaa, rautono:
ii (a)haa bihi nitgahaj ke, ii rautono nitgahaj ke
2sg left hand side VLI 2sg right side INST
'one at your left (hand side) and one on your right hand side' [NT: Mark 1 0 : 3 7 ]
c)rautono:
kaa=te liboro rautono ke ne
this=FOC book right VLI be-3ps/E
'It is to the book's right.'
The word itQÜu is related to the verb n-itQÜuta-a 'go near' (with the
intransitiviser ne-, cf. §16.2). As a relational noun it can be used in the sense o f
'in the vicinity o f (cf. (226a)). It does not take an argument and does not occur
with ke. However, the phonological structure of ÜQÜU may give rise to
speculations that it is inherently combined with the locative marker - « . The
same speculations regarding the compatibility with -u can be applied to the
word for 'top'. Eküu is also similar to itgüu in that it does not take an argument
and is not compatible with ke. Note that in (226b), eküu appears to have
modifying function, while it is a nominal head in (226c).
buhua 'cover'
This word is used to refer to 'cover' in the sense of 'protection' and could also
be translated as 'in the cover o f or 'protected by'. In a locational manner it
could also be understood as referring to the location 'behind', since the
protecting object usually covers the hiding participant. It typically occurs with
the locative suffix -u (realised as -ju in (227b)), but is not observed with ke.
buhua may occur with an argument optionally. In (227a), it occurs as head of a
possessive construction ('their uncle's cover')."
26
The variation between -u and -ju for the locative suffix may be based on dialectal
differences for the noun. It seems that buhua is realised as buhuaj in the Chambira
dialect.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Nouns 161
b)
ku hetau buhua-ju ne-tü hüara-he
there HRS cover-LOC be-INTS.PRT see-CNT:3ps/E
'She was staying there watching from her cover.'
One strategy for a noun to modify another noun is by nominalisation, i.e. a verb
is suffixed with a nominalising suffix in order to modify another noun. This is
used as a strategy for relativisation (due to the absence of relative constructions)
and is very productive. Urarina has three nominalising suffixes that can be
employed in this manner. One is the suffix -naa, which is otherwise used in
order to derive an abstract or agentive noun from a verb. A nominalised verb
with -naa can occur as a modifier of a noun in any syntactic function. The
position of the verb nominalised with -naa can be before or after the noun it
modifies. A detailed discussion of noun modifiers and their position within the
NP follows in chapter 6 on NP structure.
The examples in (228) illustrate the use of deverbal nouns resulting from
suffixation with -naa (underlined).
b) Prenominal modifier:
saatonom-a ne-naa lureri
be.last-3ps/E be-NOM house
'the last house'
The other nominalising suffix, -i, refers to the subject of an intransitive verb or
to the object of a transitive verb (cf. (229)). Again, the position of the
nominalised verb varies.
In example (229c), -i refers to a verb object 'what (I) create(d)'. Note that
another nominalising suffix, -era, refers to an A argument and the verb will take
an object as in mi lenorie te-era ('that' 'food' 'give'-AG) 'the one who has given
that food'. In (230), a verb nominalised with -era functions as a modifier. It can
occur before or after the nominal head.
categories typically assigned to adjectives (but note that these concepts are not
expressed by adjectives in Urarina, cf. §5.4). There are only few nouns that can
function as a modifier of another noun and these cannot be freely combined
with any noun, as the following examples show: the noun enamanaa 'young
(man)' can modify the noun kat$a for 'man/person', but its use with ' w o m a n '
or 'peccary' is not possible. Note that enamanaa typically occurs by itself. The
order of such modifiers as enamanaa is not fixed, as it can occur in prenominal
or postnominal position.
a)
enamanaa katga / katQa enamanaa
young.man man
'young man'
b)
*eene enamanaa *raana enamanaa
woman young.man w.l.peccary young.man
eene misjonera
woman missionary
'a woman who is a missionary'
It should be noted that these constructions are elicited and not very productive.
For instance, eene batiri 'a woman who is a priest' is not an acceptable
combination (though this may be based on semantic restrictions). Similarly the
modification of a noun through a noun that specifies tribal affiliation is
restricted: it is not possible with the tribal name for 'Cocama' (a neighbouring
group), while 'Urarina' is used as a modifier. Also the general term for 'Indio'
can function as a modifier.
a)
bakaua katga kiitga
Indio man boy
'son of an Indio'
b)
uraripa nuse
PLN town'
'Urarina village'
c)
*kanaanaj kohoamo
child TRN
[to mean: 'Cocama child']
A different type of noun that can modify another noun are nouns that specify
the category of a proper noun, such as place names. The order in these cases is
fixed for each modifier: with the modifier beetle, the proper noun occurs in first
position (cf. (234a)), but in the examples (234b,c), the proper noun is preceded
by the modifier.
a)
lomaj b-eene
PSN ASCM-woman
'the woman Lomai'
b)
maria lana hose
PSN husband PSN
'Jose, husband of Maria' [NT: Matthew 1:16]
c)
rey herodesi
king PSN
'Herod the king' [NT: Matthew 2:1 ]
Another noun that can be used as a modifier is the word for ' c h i e f (which is
also used for 'male'). In (235), it precedes the proper noun. According to
information gathered in elicitation, the order could also be reversed, but the
example would be ambiguous then: huliä kuraanaa could be understood as
'chief Julian' or as a possessive construction 'Julian's c h i e f .
kuraanaa huliä
chief PSN
'chief Julian'
In the Urarina N T translation, there are various examples for place names
combined with the respective noun denoting the kind of geographical
specification, such as 'river', 'town', or 'country'. The order in which these
occur is variable. Also note that the proper noun can occur without the
specifying noun. It is normally used in order to introduce a name when used for
the first time in a text. Note that the function of the associative modifying prefix
b- (also observed in b-eene in (234a)), which is discussed further in §7.3.2 is not
entirely clear.
a)
egipto b-atane
PLN ASCM-land
'(the land of) Egypt' [NT: Acts 7:40]
b)
kuniniku b-atane ku-fzoauana turu-Ί sini-akaanu
PLN ASCM-land ASC-harbour arrive-PRT sleep-lpl/ex
'We arrived at the port of Coninico and slept.'
The order of modifier and modified noun can be reversed with nuse (or variant
nuse in the Chambira dialect) 'town'. The word nukue for 'river', always occurs
before the proper noun.
a)
lejhii nese betafzuahee
one town PLN
'one (certain) town [called] Bethphage' [NT: Matthew 21:1]
b)
nukue taba-j eufrate auania
river be.big-NOM sb j PLN edge
'at the edge of the big river Euphrates' [NT: Revelation 9:14]
The particular properties of nouns and location (cf. §5.1.2) allows the
conclusion that there are separate subclasses of nouns. However, it is difficult to
classify the group of nouns that co-occurs with proper nouns as modifiers. From
the examples attested, one can conclude that these include nouns that refer to
location or types of person. Combinations with any further nouns are not
attested, but cannot be excluded.
A summary of their functions was given in (214). In addition, there are a few
subtypes of nouns that will be discussed in other sections of this chapter. These
include nouns with adjectival properties, personal pronouns, and demonstratives
(cf. §5.4 to §5.6).27 Note that interrogatives are not listed here as there is only
one underived interrogative (cf. §5.9). As stated in §7, nearly all noun types can
function as the head of a possessive NP (cf. (500)).
5.2 Verbs
Verbs can be subject to a large number of inflections. These include, person and
number, polarity, tense, aspect, mood and various kinds of modality/Aktionsart.
Valency-changing suffixes such as for passive and causative can be attached to
some verbs. Generally, verbs have three different forms of inflection for
person/number/polarity, depending on the clause type and/or the constituent
order (cf. §11). Another set of suffixes is used to cross-reference objects and
intransitive subjects under certain conditions. All grammatical categories are
realised as suffixes on the verb; the only productive prefix is the intransitiviser
ne- (cf. (240); §16.2).
Regarding transitivity, Urarina verbs fall into two main classes - transitive
vs. intransitive verbs, with several subclasses the details for which will be
discussed in §9. In summary, there are transitive, active intransitive, stative
intransitive, and reflexive or intransitivised verbs. However, these are not
clearly distinguished morphologically on the lexical level. The differences
become clear only through the use of derivational morphology. For instance, in
nominalisations, different suffixes are assigned to transitive and intransitive
verbs (cf. §6.6). The distinction of stative and active intransitive verbs is subtle
as stative intransitive verbs can take a special plural suffix, but are otherwise
hard to distinguish from active intransitive verbs (cf. §9.2.2). Ambitransitivity is
a marginal feature attested for one verb only, as is seen in §9.4. In §9.5, I will
also argue that Urarina has no ditransitive verbs. Any constituents that appear
external arguments at first sight are in fact adjuncts that can occur with any
27
Note that kinship terms are discussed in §13. While they may be regarded as another
subtype of noun, this distinction is only based on factors related to possession.
Otherwise, kinship terms exhibit exactly the same features as standard nouns.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Verbs 167
transitive or intransitive verb. The special properties of the copula are discussed
in §9.6.
In the following, I will briefly illustrate the function of each verb class.
Transitive verbs and active intransitive verbs are difficult to distinguish from
each other as they do not exhibit any differences on the morphological level. A
distinction is possible through their syntactic behaviour since transitive verbs
take an object as an argument whereas intransitive verbs do not. In (238a), the
transitive verb for 'hear' is shown with the lsg pronoun as an object. The
intransitive verb sinia 'sleep' does not take an object, as shown in (238b).
However, a typical feature of Urarina is that transitive verbs typically occur
without an object if it refers to a 3ps pronoun, as illustrated in (238c): in this
example, the 3pl object pronoun is implicitly known through the context, but is
not realised here (also cf. §18.1 on this subject).
Stative intransitive verbs, such as tabaa 'be big' exhibit only few differences to
active intransitive verbs that are not visible at first sight. While the plural suffix
for active intransitive verbs always is -uru (as with 'sleep' in (238c)), stative
verbs can take the plural suffix -ana (instead of -uru or in addition; cf. §9.2.2).
This is shown with the verb karetoa 'be long' below.
a) Transitive verb:
obana it$afwa-a kat$a
cl.peccary shoot-3ps/A man
'The man shot the collared peccary.'
5.3 Adverbs
While the suffixation of the participle form to a verb is a very productive way to
create adverbs, Urarina has only a limited number of underived adverbs.
Remarkably, almost all of them are time-related. A further feature shared by
these adverbs is that they preferably (not obligatorily) occur in preverbal
position. (However, note that otherwise the position of adverbs is relatively free
in the language, cf. §18.4.2.) Adverbs can be categorized into five types, being
related to time, place, manner, degree, and epistemics. Some isolated words that
do not fit into these subclasses may not be regarded as separate subtypes of
adverbs if they have only one member. Examples for such words are 'only' and
'also', which are not free adverbial forms, but bound morphemes. Since they
carry out functions typically assigned to adverbs, I discuss these under "Others"
(§5.3.6). The table in (242) summarises some of the functions of the adverbs
discussed in this chapter. All adverbs modify a verb, but not all can also modify
a noun. Another distinctive feature is whether they occur with a focus marker in
sentence-initial position, as some are not attested in this combination (but they
can occur in this position without a focus marker). The status of adverbs as
derived or underived is indicated by hyphens between the morpheme
boundaries, where applicable.
Urarina has eight underived time-related adverbs. In (244) to (249) the use of
each of these is illustrated by examples.
ena 'now'
enene/enane 'nowadays'
The adverb ena has a wider semantic range than the English word for 'now', as
it can also mean 'a moment ago' or 'in a moment', 'soon', referring to present,
past or future meaning. Apparently, the distinction of an exact point on the
timeline in the literal sense (of minutes and seconds) is not important in Urarina
language.
c) Future reference:
kaa ßaara atane ena-atQa=na lemu-ri-tQäu=ra
this 2pl land now-only=FOC:lsg flood-IRR-lsg/A=EMF
'Now I will flood your land.' [Implied: 'in a moment']
d) Past reference:
ena-te it$a-e
now=FOC do-3ps/E
'He did it right now.' [Implied: 'a moment ago']
a)
nete ßäe enene ne-ene
but already nowadays be-NEG:3ps/E
'But now it [this custom] does not exist any more.'
b)
enane ne-nakauru nijei nitoanei itQa-na najni-ji
nowadays be-those.who not.at.all like.that do-INF be.able-NEG:3ps/A
'The people who live nowadays cannot do anything like that.'
Urarina also has underived adverbs for the description of days in terms of
'yesterday', 'tomorrow', and 'the next day' (with respect to the time of
utterance, e.g. 'the day after tomorrow' if pronounced today).
b) 'Tomorrow':
eresi turu-i-tge-ne
tomorrow arrive-2ps-PL=CND
'when you arrive tomorrow'
T h e adverb hajti 'still' can be used with both affirmative and negative
clauses. In combination with negation it means 'not yet'.
a) 'Still':
hajti=te ne ißono ku-ur-era
stiIl=FOC be:3sg/E ayahuasca drink-PL-AG
'There are still those who drink ayahuasca.'
b) 'Not yet':
hajti huituku-a-ü u-ri-tQa=~i itQasu=ne
still know-NEG-lsg/E come-IRR-3ps/A=ASS brother=CND
Ί don't know yet if my brother will come.'
T h e adverb hauria can refer to 'earlier', 'before', or 'at first'. It also occurs in
combination with nehe-ι, w h i c h is the continuous participle form o f the copula.
In this form it can mean 'at first', 'in the beginning'.
a) 'At first':
hauria aasaern ajrinia ne-uri-1
first a.while outside be-RAP-PRT
'first waiting outside for a while ...'
b)'Earlier':
hauria ne-nakauru katga-uru
earlier be-those.who man-PL
'the people who lived earlier/before'
c) Derived form:
haurianehel eno-akaanu=ne hana
at.first enter- lpl/ex=SUB when
'when we entered [the Espejo River] for the first time'
a)
rü-a hanutü hana, ßäe tabiitga hoara-a ku-ure
be-3ps/D morning when already finally see-NTR go-3pl/E
'When it was morning, they finally went to look.'
b)
nitQata+hanu-l kuane tabiitga ßäe ekoo-ka u-e
three+day-PRT inside finally already appear-NTR come-3ps/E
'After three days she [the lost girl] finally appeared.'
Some other time- or frequency-related words are verbs or they show signs of
verbal derivation/inflection. The adverb poae=lu 'earlier', 'in ancient times', is a
combination of a root that is also found as ßoae-si 'ancient person'. Though its
root /jioae/ is not a regular verb root, it is used with the remoteness marker =lu,
or alternatively with the recent past evidential =ni (for the function of these
enclitics, see §12.3).
With other roots (whose class membership cannot be specified as these may
be relics of the traditional language), the occurrence of the participle form -~i is
particularly frequent (cf. §20.3). Here, it functions as an adverbialiser. For
example, with the verb for 'repeat' kiuajti-a, it is used as a frozen adverb kiuajtei
'again', but literally, it may also be translated as 'repeating it'.
The words for 'again' may not be strictly time-related, but they refer to
frequency. The main difference between these two is in origin; in the present
state of the language, they are used interchangeably, kiuajtei and nahuaauneei
can occur separately or in combination, in any order. Semantically, this
combination usually refers to an action or event that has already been repeated
several times.
a) hoajtei:
u-ι kiuajtel turu-uru-a
go-PRT again arrive-PL-3ps/A
'Going, they arrived again.'
b) nahoaaunei:
ne-uru-a baja ku nahoaaunei nala-a-ne hana
be-PL-3ps/D after there again drop-3ps/D=SUB when
'after they stayed there [for a long time], when he dropped a fruit again ...'
d) Order variation:
nahoaaunei hoajtei muku-a hana ßäe hoajtei nahoaaunei ku-a
again again catch-3ps/D when already again again go-3ps/E
'When she started to make [Lit. 'catch' children] again, he went (hunting) again.'
karahal ku ne-ure
long-time there be-3pl/E
'They stayed there for a long time.'
Most other types of adverbs are derived, similar to the morphologically complex
time-related adverbs discussed here. Most commonly, these adverbs contain a
suffix -i, which is a very frequent form and otherwise occurs with verbs (cf.
§20.3). It has a wide range of functions and could also be described as a participle
form or a converb, making the function of the affected verb adverbial (cf.
§20.3.4.3). Some of these adverbs represent fossilized forms: though the probable
original structure of their composition can be recognized, their roots do not occur
in isolation.
The complex morphological structure of adverbs can also be illustrated with the
group of place-related adverbs, such as 'here' and 'there'. These are
combinations of a demonstrative base (a subtype of noun) with locative
suffixes: kaa 'this' (close to the speaker), mi 'that' (close to the listener), or taa
'that over there' (not close to any of the two; cf. §5.6).
Urarina has two words for 'together', hi?vikn and hiniitQai, which are obviously
related. What appears to be the "root" ([hinii]), however, is not attested
elsewhere. The precise difference between the two forms is difficult to
determine, as they are used interchangeable with regard to meaning. However,
one difference is that hiniitQai can be prefixed with a proclitic (usually being
object or possessive in this position, depending on whether it co-occurs with a
28
The root *toania cannot occur without a demonstrative prefixed to it; however, it is
plausible to split the word into morphemes, as the root also occurs with the
demonstrative for 'this' in ka-toani-a 'be like this'.
noun or with a verb). In contrast, hirdikn does not occur with proclitics. Another
observation is that the distribution of the two words is also based on dialectal
differences: hiniikii is the form most widely used in the Espejo dialect, whereas
hiniitQäi appears to be predominant in other dialects, according to Espejo
consultants.
a)
hiniiku=jia itQa-akaanu
together=FOC:lpl do-lpl/ex
'We did it together.'
b)
nii hana reemae hetau=te rüa sini hiniitQai
that when dog HRS=FOC side sleep-3ps/E together
'Then the dog slept together with him at his side.' [from Airico dialect]
a) 'Alone':
nii eerte ku helaj neda-e
that woman there separate stay-3ps/E
'That woman stayed there alone.'
b) 'Separate':
helaj=te ne kanaka ana eruari
separate=FOC be:3ps/E lpl/ex mosquito.net
'Our mosquito nets are separate.' [i.e. for each of us]
The only word used to express degree is the intensifier hatai. Since it has some
peculiarities, it is difficult to decide to which word class it belongs. It can occur
with verbs (in preverbal or postverbal position) and with adverbs. It is also
attested for its co-occurrence with the quantifying noun itulere, as illustrated in
90
(258d); also cf. § 5 . 4 / ' However, the fact that it also ends in -7 supports the
assumption that it might be an ancient derivation from a verb (even though the
meaning of its root cannot be given).
a) Preverbal position:
hatai ahi-a=ne hau
very get.drunk-3ps/D=SUB because
'because she was very drunk'
b) Postverbal position:
ßadera-ure hatai katQa-uru
be.sad-3pl/E very man-PL
'The people were very sad.'
c) With adverb:
hatai ena
very now
'very soon'
29
In the NT translation, it is also attested with the adjectival noun biifla 'old (person)'.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Adverbs 179
(259) Epistemics
heriam is also attested in combination with -he-1, the participle form of the
continuous aspect, which is normally attached to verbs. Its meaning does not
change substantially through this suffixation.
In contrast to heriane, the word hetQa (also pronounced hit$a in the Tigrillo
dialect) expresses an unfulfilled expectation. Using hetga, the speaker describes
a situation of which he knows that the action or expectation described in the
sentence is unfulfilled. For instance, in a sentence such as (262a) Ί said that the
ship would take us', the speaker now knows that this did not occur, whereas in
the original utterance he was convinced that the ship would take them. Similarly
in (262b), the speaker describes his own failure to do something which he
thought he had done. In (262c), the subject of the main verb ('come') is
different from the one in the dependent clause ('do'). In this case, the insertion
of the quotative verb naa is obligatory.
a)
kana ama-ri-tQa=i hetQa na-anu
lpl/in take-IRR-3ps/A=ASS supposedly say-lsg/A
Ί said that it [the ship] was supposed to take us.' [Lit. "would supposedly take us"]
b)
itQa-käu hetQa
do-lsg/A supposedly
Ί supposedly did it.' [Implying: Ί thought I would do it but I did not.']
c)
itQa-a hetQa m-ι u-u
do-3ps/A supposedly say-PRT come-lsg/E
'(Wrongly) supposing that he had done it, I came.'
a) Meaning 'certainly':
ßatona =te aka ne
certainly=FOC 3sg be-3ps/E
'Certainly it was him.'
b) Meaning 'exactly':
ßatona nil ajto-a hau rihihei kauatü esißae teru tokuanei
exactly that say-3ps/D because like nicely really axe compared.to
hetau toku-hzue
Η RS be.lying-3ps/E
'Exactly as he [the guide] had said before, there was lying really nicely [something] like
an axe.'
Another word that is used in adverbial function esißae 'really' (also found in
(263b)). However, it can also function as a noun, as shown in (264b), where it
occurs as a nominal head.
a) Adverb:
esißae kauatga-ι kana+hoaaun-era saku-i
really good-PRT our.creator follow-NOMsbj
'someone who follows God really well'
b) Noun:
kana+hoaaun-era=te esißae rauta-e
1 pl/in+create-AG=FOC truth like-3ps/E
'God loves the truth.'
a)
akauru raj rauihirii ku be
3pi to really there tell:3ps/E
'There she really told it to them.'
b)
rauihirii nii hamlari asi bihijejto-a hau ku-atga n=asi
really that jaguar nose strike-3ps/D because there-only 3ps=nose
a)
hatal esijiae rauihiri-ι ku kana+kioaaun-era saku-i ne-tiakauru
very really be.right-PRT there our.creator follow-NOMSbj be-those.who
'those who really very much in truth are followers of God'
b)
atii kanakaana kuruatahane-u, esißae rauihirii ajto-a ii ere
please lpl/ex help-IMP really really say-3ps/D 2sg word
T h e expressions for ' a l s o ' , ' o n l y ' , and ' e v e n ' are independent words belonging
to an adverb class in many languages. Urarina has different strategies in order to
express these concepts. There are t w o f o r m s for ' a l s o ' : -netonaj and -nemaahel.
W h i l e I treat these as suffixes, it is difficult to distinguish them f r o m enclitics.
T h e only w a y in which they differ f r o m enclitics is their limited selectivity: both
can only occur on nouns (including demonstratives and pronouns), but are not
attached to any other word class. They undergo the same phonological
alternations as other suffixes. For instance, when -netonaj is attached to a
vowel-final root, the initial nasal is assimilated. When it follows the root vowel
/«/, it is realised as [rj], based on a rule that operates root-internally and between
roots and suffixes. As a peculiarity occurring only with -netonaj, the /n/ is elided
after the vowel /a/ and the root final vowel is nasalised in turn (cf. (267c)).
a) Velarisation:
kanaka anu-rjetonaj eno-akaanu=ne kujßa-ra
lpl/ex-also enter-lpl/ex=SUB so.that=EMF
'that we also may enter'
b) Palatalisation:
kanaanaj-ßemaahei hmtuku-a
child-also know-3ps/A
'He also knows the child.'
c) Elision of /n/:
aka-etonaj aka-uru kaihje ini-a ku-e
3ps-also 3ps-PL behind go.up-NTR. go-3ps/E
'She also climbed up behind them.'
Distinguishing the two forms for 'also' from each other is a major challenge, as
their semantic and functional properties appear to be virtually identical. The
meaning of the two sentences contrasted in (268) was judged to be "the same"
by native speakers. However, note the unusual word order in these examples,
where the subject occurs in initial position without a focus marker (cf. §18.3).
a) -netonaj:
akä-etonaj kivaa-na here
3sg-also see-INF want:3ps/E
'He also wants to see it.'
b) -nemaahel:
aka-nemaaheet huaa-na here
3sg-also see-INF want:3ps/E
'He also wants to see it.'
A possible difference could lie in the history of the two suffixes. While this is
highly speculative, one assumption would be that -nemaahei is derived from
*ne-amaa-he-l (ITR-'take.along'-CNT-PRT), which might be translated as
'including'. The suffix -netonaj is even less transparent to analysis and cannot
be interpreted.
Interestingly, the two forms occur in combination in several examples of the
NT, which would further justify the assumption that -nemaahei can be glossed
as 'including'.
One can conclude that Urarina has no independent word for 'also'. Note that
there is the word tg,äe 'also', 'besides', which functions as a conjunction and as
an adverb (cf. §20.5.1).
In a similar way as the forms for 'also', 'only' is realized as a suffix -at$a
(or allomorphs), most typically attached to nouns (270a), but also found on
postpositions (cf. (270c)). It has an emphatic function and can also be translated
as 'self in some examples (but note that there is a separate reciprocal form).
c) With postposition:
lureri kuane-etQa =na=ra ne-betaka-na here-ü
house inside-only=FOC: 1 sg=EMF ITR-relax-INF want-1 sg/E
Ί want to relax only in the house.'
The suffix -atQa can even occur on verbs where it is directly attached to the
verb root and followed by inflectional or other suffixes. In (271a), it precedes
the imperative. In this context, it has the connotation of 'simply', 'just'. In
(271b), it refers to 'only' in the sense of'nothing else'.
a)
lenone-etpa-u
eat-only-IMP
'Just eat!' [emphatic, considered impolite]
b)
kana nekivehe+d$anu-atQa-ki-tQe=ra
lpl/in shame+make.feel-only-2ps-PLT=EMF
' Y o u (will) just put shame upon us!'
An additional function of -atQa might be related to its emphatic use and its
meaning 'only', but is not translated as such in one particular construction: in
nominalisations with the derivational suffix -i. This morpheme can refer to the
subject of an intransitive clause or to the object of a transitive clause (cf.
§6.6.1). The attachment of -atQa is obligatory to the underlying subject of this
construction.
a)
nii-tga here-j itga-kure
that-only want-NOM 0 bj do-3pl/E
' T h e y did what he wanted.'
b)
nerauta-e nii lejhii katQa, akaw-atQa kunajta-j
get.well-3ps/E that one man snake-only hurt-NOMobj
'That one man got better, the one whom the snake hurt.'
The suffix -atQa has several allomorphs. Its realisation depends on the
preceding vowel.
5.4 Adjectives
Dixon (2004:3f) identifies four semantic classes that are typically expressed by
adjectives from a typological perspective: dimension, age, value, and colour. If
Urarina has an adjective class, its members are likely to be found in these
semantic groups. Further semantic classes include physical property, human
propensity, and speed. However, while these concepts are typically represented
by adjectives in other languages, they are mainly expressed by nouns or verbs in
Urarina (sometimes by special types of nouns or verbs). For instance, the
concepts for age are mainly expressed by nouns (cf. (286)), while all colour-
related terms are verbs (cf. (275)). Stative verbs can be nominalised to take
modifier function. Two dimension-related words come close to prototypical
adjectives with regard to their function, but since the morphological and
syntactic features of these do not match exactly, I conclude that there is no
underived class of adjectives in the language.
In defining the typical properties of adjectives, several tests are commonly
used in order to distinguish an adjective class from other word classes. The
main point of distinction then is whether they are "verb-like" or "noun-like".
The following criteria help to identify them for one of the two groups. In order
to compare a potential adjective with a noun, the following checkpoints (listed
here as based on cross-linguistic tendencies) should be involved:
1) Can the word function as a nominal head? - While this is obviously a typical
property of a noun, it is not one of adjectives.
2) Can it function as a noun modifier? - This is a typical characteristic of an
adjective, and in some languages also a feature of nouns. In Urarina, only a
very limited group of nouns can function as such.
3) Can it function as a copula complement? Even though this is a property also
associated with nouns, adjectives typically appear in this function.
4) Can the word take a noun plural? - This is another property that applies to
nouns. In number agreement (which Urarina has only in part and as an
optional feature within the NP) one may expect an adjective to be marked for
number. In any case this would help to distinguish between noun-like and
verb-like adjectives.
Properties that are typically assigned to verbs help to recognize whether a word
is verb-like or is an actual verb:
5) Can it take verbal suffixes?
6) Can the word be modified by an intensifier? 30
30
The intensifier hatal is typically used with verbs but, as seen in the previous section,
it can also modify a noun in some cases. Therefore, this test is not ideal for the
distinction between nouns and verbs.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
188 Word classes
lanahaj 'red'
somahaj 'white'
hitQuhiuaj 'black'
berauesiohioaj 'green', also used for 'blue'
kafwahaj 'yellow'
Some examples as illustrated with 'red' in (276) show that the respective roots
of these verbs regularly occur with other kinds of inflection. In the same way as
other stative verbs, they occur with different values for polarity, tense, and with
some derivations.
b) Irrealis (future):
lana-ri-tQa=7
be.red-IRR-3ps/A=ASS
'It will be red.'
c) Negation:
lana-7a-i
be.red-NEG-NEG:3ps/A
'It is not red.'
While the final [j] of the words depicted in (275) is analysed as the
nominalising suffix -z, which merges with a preceding vowel (cf. §3.4), the part
[ha] is a less productive element of the morphology. This suffix occurs as a
derivational suffix with a few stative verbs only; most other stative verbs are not
compatible with it. Besides, the verbal roots referring to colour also occur
without /ha/. For instance, the verb for 'be red' is lanaa-ka. In addition to the
colour terms, the suffix -ha is also found with two other adjective-like words: it
occurs in tasijiohwaa 'be big', whose nominalised form tasißohzvaj also
functions as an adjective, and in seeohwa 'big', which is a noun-like adjective
(for semantic distinctions between the words for 'big' see (284)).
There is another suffix that can be attached to colour terms (but unattested
with other words): -hio (or -sio as in berausiohwaj 'green') indicates the
equivalent of the English derivational suffix '-ish' for these verbs (cf. §10.2.2).
The form lana-hio-hwa-j 'reddish', 'medium red' is also used to describe
colours similar to red for which no separate term exists, such as 'pink'.
Correspondingly, the form hitQua-hio-hiva-j is attested to describe 'purple'. The
word berauesiohzoaj 'green' is obviously derived in the same way, but the
meaning of its original root (*/bera«e/) is unknown. The combination of the
two suffixes to -hiohwa is also observed with some other stative verbs, as
illustrated in (277). For example, nohwaa 'be hard' occurs as nohweohwaa with
the meaning of medium degree 'be kind of hard', 'be hardish'. However, this
form cannot be used freely with other stative verbs.
A feature that distinguishes stative verbs from other verbs is the fact that they
can modify a noun when they are nominalised with -i. As opposed to the
occurrence of this suffix on intransitive verbs, where it refers to the S argument,
the suffixation to stative verbs refers to a quality and modifies a noun.
Note that in all examples listed above, the modifier follows the noun. This
corresponds to examples in which the nominaliser -i occurs with an intransitive
verb (cf.(279)). However, note that in constructions with a transitive verb, the
nominalised verb occurs before the modified noun.
In conclusion about colour terms, it can be said that these are consistently
represented by stative verbs. Derivation with -i can convert these into modifiers,
which is a strategy also found with other verbs.
Another word that can be described as an adjectival verb is äa/ihia 'be
small/little'. Its main use is in the nominalised form, which is used to mean 'a
little'. In this case, it takes the form / ä a f i h i - i / .
b) Noun modifier:
äafihi-i nune baku-ri-1 u-a-e
be.small-NOMsbj branch break-RAP-PRT come-CAUl-3ps/E
'He broke off a little branch and brought it.'
c) Nominal head:
lejhu=te aasihi-i ama-e
one=FOC be.little-NOMsbj take-3ps/E
'One [man] takes along a little.' [The other one carries lot.]
A further candidate on the list of possible adjectives is the word for 'good'.
Similar to äafihii, this one is hard to classify because it takes a number of very
different functions. In some cases, morphological derivation is required, in
others, the word simply takes a different role without being altered. There are
two basic forms in which the root for 'good' occurs: kaua-tga and
kaua-toa. The root /kaua/, which these forms have in common never occurs in
isolation. Also /tpa/ is not a suffix found elsewhere in Urarina morphology
(only as a variant of -a after /i/; but note that the root /kaua/ does not end with
l\l). -toa is a frequent derivational suffix found with verb roots in order to
express intensity, or stativity (cf. §10.2.3). From this suffix, the forms
kaua-ti, a n d kaua-tii are derived, -tu is the participle form of -toa, and -ti is
the nominalised form of -toa (a morpho-phonologically irregular combination
of -to + -/). One difference between kauatQa and kanatoa is a semantic one:
while kauatQa tends to refer to ' g o o d ' in terms of character (e.g. a good
worker), kauatoa implies a more visual quality such as ' n i c e ' , 'pretty',
'beautiful' or 'clean', depending on the context.
One function of ' g o o d ' is as a verb, kauatoa can be inflected for tense,
polarity, and person in the same way as any other stative verb.
a)
hatal kauato-a hau
very be.good-3ps/D because
'because she was very beautiful'
b)
kauato-ri-tQa-7 hanonaa
be.good-IRR-3ps=ASS day
'It will be a nice day.'
In its nominalised form with -z, the word functions as a noun modifier in
prenominal or postnominal position.
a) Prenominal modifier:
ni-a kauat-i tefzuolo-ne
be-3ps/D be.good-NOMsbj church.building=CND
'if there is a nice church building'
b) Postnominal modifier:
ni-a ka=raj teru kauat-i
be-3ps/A lsg=POSS axe be.good-NOM sbj
Ί have a good axe.'
a)
kauati-i kusißa-u
be.good-PRT close-IMP
'Close it well!'
b)
aka=te kauati-i enua sau-e
3sg=F0C be.good-PRT wood cut-3ps/E
'It (the axe) cuts wood well.'
The peculiarities of the word kauatQa for ' g o o d ' are discussed in §5.4.2, since it
is not a stative verb.
Urarina has three different words for ' b i g ' , two of which are stative verbs:
tabaa and tasijiohwaa. These have the same properties as the other stative
verbs described above: with the nominaliser -i, they function as postnominal
modifiers; with the participle form, they can be adverbialised. The other word,
seohwa, is noun-like; the differences between the three words for ' b i g ' will be
discussed in the following section.
While the three terms for ' b i g ' have different syntactic and morphological
properties, their semantic distinction is much less obvious. Generally there
appear to be almost no restrictions as to the use of each of them in modifier
function with nouns, as is clear from the table in (284). As a tendency, however,
one may say that there is a preference to use seohwa for artefacts and tabaj (the
nominalised form of the stative verb tabaa) for nature-related or abstract nouns,
while the use of tasißohwaj (from the stative verb tasißohwaa) is unrestricted.
Regarding the actual size of the modified object, consultation with different
speakers lead to inconclusive characterisations between the three words. While
with most speakers, tabaj appears to refer to a larger size than the other two
words, the size distinction of tasißohwaj and seohwa is not drawn consistently.
A more obvious distinction is of a syntactic nature. While tasijiohwaj can occur
as a noun modifier, it is less common in this function. The main and preferred
use of tasiflohwaa is as a verb. When it is used as a modifier, it evidently tends
to refer to a process 'having become big' with some nouns, e.g. with humans
and animals. A further restriction to tasißohwaa is that is does not occur with
abstract nouns. In contrast, the verb tabaa tends not to be used with some
human terms, such as 'woman', while its use as a modifier for 'woman' is
possible. In summary, the semantic distinction between the different words for
'big' remains challenging.
An important difference between seohwa and the other two terms is its
syntactic and morphological structure, seohwa is one of only two words that
matches the typical properties of an adjective, in terms of its syntactic
behaviour. Its ending in [hwaa] is clearly non-verbal, since no kind of
derivation or inflection is possible in this case, while it occurs with all stative
verbs that contain -h(w)aa as a suffix. Thus, the form *seohzoa-j or any kind of
inflection for tense or polarity is not possible. It is plausible to conclude that the
31
Nouns in brackets were reluctantly accepted as "possible", but unusual combinations
with the respective modifier. Dashes indicate that a combination is not possible.
"Unattested" combinations were not tested.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Adjectives 195
a)
bute seohwa itga-e
boat big make-3ps/E
'He made a big boat.'
b)
aka=te katpa seohwa ne
house=FOC man big be:3ps/E
'He is a big man.'
Note that seohwa can only occur in postnominal position, whereas some
deverbal adjectives are also found in prenominal position. Even though seohwa
does not occur as a copula complement, it is noun-like in that it can take a plural
form to mean 'the big ones'. From these features, one may conclude that
seohwa is either a noun with adjectival properties or an adjective with noun-like
qualities.
Further adjectival nouns include enamanaa 'young (man)' and biißa 'old
(man)'. Both are used as nominal heads and they can take a noun plural suffix:
the forms emmanaa-kuru, biißa-htru refer to 'young/old people', respectively.
The use of these words as copula complements is also a feature typically found
with nouns (but also with adjectives).
b) Head of NP:
turu-a biißa
arrive-3ps/A old.man
'The old man has arrived.'
c) Copula complement:
enamanaa ni-a ka=katg,a
young.man be-3ps/A this=man
'This man is (a) young (person).'
d) Copula complement:
ßäe hatai biißa ni-a=ne sajhjel
already very old.man be-3ps/D=SUB although
'although they were very old (people) already' [NT: Hebrews 11:12]
Another feature of 'old' and 'young' is that they can co-occur with the
intensifler hatai. Both words can function as a modifier; however, enamanaa
can modify only animate nouns (not restricted to humans), while biißa is also
used with inanimate nouns.
a) Human:
katga biißa(-kbtru)
man old(-PL)
'old man/(men)'
b) Animate:
raana enamanaa
w.l.peccary young
'young white-lipped peccary
c) Inanimate:
lureri biißa
house old
'old house'
The word for 'other', leot$a, typically occurs as a nominal head. It is also
attested in modifying position, but different to other modifiers. While most
adjectival modifiers occur in postnominal position, leotQa is only observed
before the head noun. Note that this word can refer to animate or inanimate
nouns.
(288) U s e o f leotQa
a) As nominal head:
leotQa raj=ßa te-ü
other for=FOC:lsg give-lsg/E
Ί have passed it on to someone else.'
b) As modifier:
leotQa itgau-naa ke itgau-ru-a
other live-NOM VLI live-PL-3ps/A
'They live a different life.'
a) Head of NP:
ii=te baaso itga-i
2sg=FOC bad do-2ps
'You did bad things.'
b) Modifier:
katQa baaso
man bad
'bad man'
Related to baaso is the word aaso, which means 'foolish (person)' and refers to
animate nouns only. It functions as a nominal head and can take a noun plural,
as the examples in (290) show. It is not attested as a noun modifier, but this
could be due to its low frequency in use.
a)
ka=rihiite=ra erele+akane aaso
this=do.like:3ps/E=EMF mosquito+insect foolish
'The crazy mosquito did like that to me!'
b)
aaso ajßa mausa rihihei ne-nakauru katpa-uru
foolish and blind like be-those.who man-PL
'Ye fools and blind!' [NT: Matthew 23:17]
Another word related to the two above is äasaj 'wicked, evil'. However, it does
not behave in the same way as baaso and aaso, as its syntactic use is different.
At first sight, it seems to be an adverb, as it modifies the (nominalised) verb
'live' in example (291), meaning 'those who live in an evil manner'. In other
examples, it is used as a noun modifier, but in this context, it only occurs with
the component mtQa (or alternatively netQU, its meaning and function is
unclear) to result in netQa-äasaj. This form can occur as a modifier in
prenominal and postnominal position. However, only very few examples are
attested, most of which occur in the Urarina New Testament. The variation
between the three words is not based on any productive derivational pattern. A
further occurrence of äasaj (without net$a) is as a nominal head, which
suggests that it is a noun.
a) Adverb:
äasaj itQau-nakauru katQa-uru
evil live-those.who man-PL
'the wicked'
b) Head of NP:
d^ale äasaj ne-ϊ aj-i
something evil be-PRT AUX-NEG:3ps/A
'He is not anything evil, [he is just a priest]!'
c) Noun modifier:
katga netea äasaj / *katQa äasaj
man ? evil
'evil man'
Urarina has two words related to 'small': laauhwiri and aajihjei (which was
investigated in §5.4.1). Similar to seohzva 'big', laauhwiri is noun-like in that it
functions as a postnominal noun modifier without morphological derivation.
However, it is special in that it has two possible forms: under certain conditions,
it occurs as laauißaa. Since this is the only word that shows this kind of
variation, it is difficult to analyse, but, based on several examples, laauißaa
refers to plurality, or more precisely, to individuality or distributive function,
a) laauhwiri
mi saabere laauhwiri ajßa ku-a hau hetau
that machete small with go-3ps/D because Η RS
'because he was going with that small machete'
b) laauißaa:
ate laauißaa hiririßo laauißaa
fish small type.of.fish small.PL
'small fish, small hiririnyo fish [were sticking out their heads]'
c) laauißaa:
ku kahe hetau ka=arulari laauißaa-kuru ne-ϊ hetau
there from HRS DEM=fox small-PL be-PRT HRS
d) laauißaa:
lejhii kampana laauißaa, lejhü tihihemele rihihe-ι ne-naa,
one bell small.PL one pomegranate be.like-PRT be-NOM
a) Singular:
enua laauhzuiri fiui-a
tree small fell-3ps/A
'He felled a small tree.'
b) Plural:
enua laauißaa-kuru fzui-uru-a
tree small.PL-PL fell-PL-3ps/A
'They felled small trees.'
The structure of the ending -ßaa also resembles the plurality suffix used with
stative verbs (cf. §9.2.2); however, the above examples demonstrate that this
form does not exactly mark plural. The lack of further forms that would occur
with -ßaa makes it difficult to make generalisations about its exact function. As
a tentative analysis, it might be characterised as being related to a distributive
plural.
The combination of aafihii and laauhzuiri is also common, as the following
examples show. In these cases, aafihii can be analysed as a nominal head
followed by the modifier laauhzuiri.
b) Prenominal modifier:
natgasipe itgau-naa
new live-NOM
'new life' [NT: various verses]
b) Copula complement:
raj lureri=te natgasipe pe
POSS house=FOC new be:3ps/E
'His house is new.'
The above example clearly qualifies natQasipe as a noun, though with some
adjective-like features.
a) Negation:
kauatga-i kuriae amu-a alau=ne
be.good-NEG:3ps/A far walk-3ps/D spider.monkey=CND
'It is not good that the monkey walks far.'
b) Future:
mi=te kauatQa-re=n satn raj
that=FOC be.good-IRR:3ps/E=ASS all for
'It will be good for all.'
c) Participle:
m-a=lu lejhii katQa kauatga-1
be-3ps/A=REM one man be.good-PRT
'There was (only) one good man.'
On the other hand, exactly this stem is used with other functions without being
modified. In the following examples, it functions as a noun, a (prenominal or
postnominal) modifier, and as an adverb, which makes its status rather
questionable.
a) Noun:
d$a kauatQa ni-ji=lu
what good be-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'There were no good things.'
b) Prenominal modifier:
ßaaohwa ahaana-kanei kau situ-e kaa kauatQa ate kosemane
how.much year-ago here pass-3ps/E this good tapir
'How many tears ago did this great tapir pass here?'
c) Adverb:
kauatQa hakuturu-a hau
good make.dry.out-3ps/D because
'as he made [the sea] dry out well ...'
Even if we assumed that kauatQa is a noun, one would have to explain its use as
a verb stem in the previous examples. Additional evidence against treating
kauatQa as a noun is found by examples where the participle marker -7 is
attached to kauatQa - which clearly makes it look like a verb. The only
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Adjectives 203
conclusion that can be drawn from the peculiar behaviour of kauatpa is that this
word is exceptional with respect to its assignment to any of the word classes
and that it must be regarded as "multifunctional".
32
The criteria are numbered according to the numbering in the introduction to 5.4.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
204 Word classes
Table (299) shows that the syntactic and morphological structure of noun-like
"adjectival candidates" is highly heterogeneous. All three terms related to the
semantic concept of age fall into this category, but their syntactic behaviour
differs between the respective words, especially with regard to the position in
modifying function. Three words that refer to value or human propensity, such
as 'bad' and related concepts differ from each other in a similar way. However,
age-related as well as value-related terms can all be characterised as nouns, as
they follow the two main properties that are embodied by Urarina nouns, i.e.
they can function as nominal heads and as such also occur as copula
complements. They also form the same plural as nouns, though this is unclear
for two of the words. A property that distinguishes these words from
prototypical nouns is that adjective-like nouns can be accompanied by the
intensifier hatäi, while this is not normally observed with "regular" nouns.
The two terms relating to dimension listed in (299) are different from the
others in that they do not occur as nominal heads. Their use as copula
complement is possible, but only attested from elicited examples. Their function
as noun modifiers is restricted to postnominal position. Yet, they cannot be said
to form a - admittedly very small - class of adjectives because they differ from
each other with regard to plural formation. Thus, they must be described as
exceptional cases of adjectives in a language that does not have a class of
underived adjectives. However, what all of the words listed in (299) have in
common is that they are in fact different from prototypical nouns in that they
can function as noun modifiers, which is a property otherwise represented only
by a very limited group of nouns such as names and nominalisations (cf.
§5.1.3). This is a feature they share with verb-like adjectival candidates. Apart
form one exception, they only occur as noun modifiers after being derived by
the nominalising suffix -i, which of course is a feature inherent to any stative
verb. The words listed in table (300) shows a selection of typical verb-like
adjectives, which represent the semantic concepts of dimension, colour, and
value.
which is derived). Another feature they share with nouns is that the noun plural
-uru can be attached to most of these. The main difference to other nouns lies in
their behaviour as noun modifiers. While a noun only rarely modifies another
noun, the words under discussion do so. The other important difference to
nouns is that these are not accompanied by the intensifier, while the adjective-
like nouns have this option.
All verb-like "adjectives" are derived; their behaviour is quite similar to that
of Stative verbs. Again, the main difference lies in their function as a modifier.
a)
nii kahjune lanaha-j hitQiia-hiohiua-j
that cloth be.red-NOMsbj be.black-DER-NOM S b j
'that purple cloth' [NT: Mark 15:20]
b)
somaha-j kahjune kauatga hikiaki-i
be.white cloth good shine-NOM Sb j
'a nice, white, shining cloth' [NT: Revelation 19:8]
More frequent than a sequence of nominalised verbs is the chaining of verbs that
carry a participle suffix, i.e. these function as adverbials. This is not surprising, as
sequences of several participle constructions (representing clauses with different
types of transitivity) are very common in Urarina (cf. §20.3). In a similar way,
a)
eku m-a lejhii atajbijiaae tasipohwa-~i lanaha-1
there be-3ps/A one animal be.big-PRT be. red-Ρ RT
'There was one big, red dragon.' [NT: Revelation 17:3]33
b)
lejhii atajbipaae dragon lanaha-j taslpohwa-l
one animal dragon be.red-NOMSbj be.big-PRT
'a great red dragon,...' [NT: Revelation 12:3]
5.4.6 Comparison
33
The words eku and atajbipaae are Chambira dialect variants of the Espejo
forms ku and tajbipaee.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
208 Word classes
N o t e that there are several variants o f derivation f r o m the verb f o r ' e x c e e d ' . T h e
d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n the different kinds o f derivation is uncertain since m o s t o f
these are non-productive and require further study. One variant is amuritoeru as
illustrated in (307).
(308) "Superlative"
a)
tabaae-ka horhe tabaae-ni-a manoel
be.big:3ps/A PSN be.big-CMP-3ps/A PSN
'Manuel is as big as Jorge.'
b)
anaito-a aheri anai-ni-a raj maleta
be.heavy-3ps/A stone be.heavy-CMP-3ps/A POSS suitcase
'His suitcase is as heavy as stone.'
However, since the suffix is not especially productive, it is attested with a few
more stative verbs only (cf. (310a)). It is not compatible with verbs such as the
ones shown in (310b). This also excludes active intransitive verbs.
a) Possible:
ahaa aha-ni-a 'be as hot as'
kalarna kalano-ni-a 'be as dirty as'
ahiflaa ahißa-ni-a 'be as sharp as'
somahaa somara-ni-a 'be as white as'
raautoa raauto-ni-a 'be as tasty as'
b) Impossible:
äatQihia 'be small'
ateroa 'be tired'
tasißohwaa 'be big'
lanaaka 'be red'
(räasaa) 'dance' (active intransitive)
A more productive way to compare two participants of equal status is with one
of several comparative verbs that express 'be like'. These include tohiama,
rihiitga (or plural rihianaa), rihitoa, and rihitohoaka. While there might be a
suspicion that these are a kind of copula (due to their semantics, which involves
identity to a certain degree), they are transitive verbs: all of these verbs take a
noun object, but cannot occur with an adjective such as nat$asijie ( ' n e w ' ; cf.
(299)), whereas the copula nia does. The difference in meaning between these
verbs is based on different kinds of perception, as is summarised in (312). The
verb tokoania is not strictly limited to any specific perceptual level and may be
characterised as a general comparative verb.
Most typically, these verbs occur in the participle form, where they have
adverbial function (cf. (314)). T w o examples for their use as finite verbs are
given in (313).
a) With tokuania:
raana tokuani-ji aräala
w.l. peccary compare-NEG:3ps/A tapir
'Tapir is not like white-lipped peccary.'
b) With rihitoa:
läe esißae baka rihito-a=m hau
just really cow do.like-3ps/D=SUB because
'because they were actually doing it like cows' [about reproductive act of tapirs]
In a similar way as amurihirii and the other verb forms that express for
superiority or inferiority, the comparative verbs listed above are used in the
participle form, sometimes preceded by a subordinate marker. Since the
combination with the participle marker does not occur when they are inflected
for person, one might argue that tokuanei and rihihei are lexicalised and
function as conjunctions (cf. §5.8). Literally, sentences such as (314a) can be
translated as 'Compared to (what) is now, there were no guns'.
a) With tokuanei:
poaelu ena aj-a-ne tokuanei itgafiua ni-ji=lu
earlier now AUX-3ps/D=SUB compared.to rifle be-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'Earlier there were no guns as there are now.'
b) With rihihei:
aka heri-a=ne rihihei ne-uru-a katQa-uru=ne kujßa
3sg want-3ps/D=SUB like be-PL-3ps/D man-PL=SUB so.that
'... so that the people would be as he wanted.'
5.5 Pronouns
Urarina marks person with bound pronouns on the verb. In addition to these,
there is a set of free pronouns which can be added to indicate emphasis. For
instance, the free pronoun is used as a focus in reply to a question ('Who killed
the monkey?' - Ί killed the monkey'). Apart from the common distinction
between 1st, 2nd, and 3rd person for both singular and plural, Urarina
differentiates between inclusive and exclusive in the 1st person plural and dual.
As Urarina does not have morphological case, personal pronouns do not differ
with respect to their function as subject or object of a verb. While the
pronominal system distinguishes between person and number, animacy does not
play a role. The pronouns for 3ps can refer to animate or inanimate nouns.
Note that the dual form of the subject is marked on the verb, but there is no
separate free pronoun for it. Instead, the lpl inclusive pronoun is used in this
context. This is illustrated in (316), which is from a context where the two
protagonists appear as the only people in the world. While this implies a "dual"
interpretation of the lpl pronoun, kana (lpl inclusive) is used.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
214 Word classes
The pronoun for lsg has a variant kiitQa that occurs in nominaliser
constructions with the suffix -i (cf. §6.6.1). In this construction, where the noun
derived from a transitive verb represents the relativised object of the clause, the
subject typically is marked with the suffix -at$a 'only', which results in
kanu-atga when it occurs with the lsg pronoun. Alternatively, the two
components can fuse and are realised as kiitQa, with no apparent semantic
difference. All other pronouns are regularly joined with -at$a in this context
without any alternation.
In addition to the free pronouns, Urarina has proclitics for the singular, which
are derived from the full forms (except for 3sg). These can be attached to nouns
and verbs. With verbs, they function as object proclitics; with nouns, they refer
to possessive pronouns (cf. §7.1.3). However, procliticisation mainly functions
as a feature of the traditional language; younger people prefer the use of free
pronouns rather than procliticisation. This applies to both personal and
possessive pronouns.
(318) Proclitics
lsg ka=
2sg i=
3sg n=, (ne=, ni=)
In particular, the use of the 3sg proclitic has been reduced even among older
speakers. While ka= and i= (or allomorph d$= for 2sg before vowel-initial
roots) are still common practice, the proclitic 11= is only observed with vowel-
initial roots. Before consonant-initial roots (319b), the use of the 3sg allomorphs
m = or m= is very rare: the two examples with these 3ps forms listed below
were rejected as ungrammatical even by an older speaker, even though these
forms occurred in a text by another speaker of the traditional variety of Urarina.
It is also obvious that the use of possessive proclitics is related to the matter of
b) 3sg forms:
n=asi 'his nose'
n=uhoana 'his field'
?m=hitQana 'his blowgun'
?ne=batohwi 'their arrows'
For proclitics that occur with object function, only the f o r m s for l s g and 2sg are
attested, while the 3sg form is not observed. T h e reason for its absence as an
object proclitic could be that 3 rd person object pronouns do not surface in
general, but are implied through omission. While it is not ungrammatical to use
them as arguments of a transitive verb, they almost never occur in this context.
T h e m e a n i n g of ' h i m ' or ' t h e m ' is mutually understood f r o m the context of an
utterance. However, all three proclitics occur in combination with postpositions,
as shown in (320c-e).
The prefix found on intransitivised verbs, ne- (and variants), which may also
have reflexive function to some degree, possibly is a remnant of the 3sg object
proclitic, as the reflexive subject in this construction is identical to the object
argument. However, this prefix exhibits an allomorphy different from the one
found with proclitics (cf. §16.2).
5.6 Demonstratives
The Urarina deictic system distinguishes three degrees of spatial reference, each
of them involving the position of the participants:
kaa 'this' (close to the speaker)
mi 'that' (close to the listener)
taa 'that over there' (distant from both participants)
Regarding this type of distinction, one could also relate the three demonstratives
with first, second, and third person, respectively, kaa even has some degree of
phonological similarity, if compared with kanu ( T ) . The similarity between nii
and ii ( ' y o u ' ) is more subtle (different onset), taa and aka ('he/she/it') have
even less in common. However, the use of the demonstratives suggests that kaa
refers to something with regard to first person, nii to second person and so on.
Evidence for this is not only provided by the phonological similarities, but also
through the deictic function of the demonstratives. The correlation between first
person and demonstrative kaa is manifested by the fact that kaa relates to an
item in the space close to the speaker; similarly nii refers to something close to
the listener, implying a relation to second person. Correspondingly, taa refers to
something not close to either the speaker or the listener - thus, implying a third
person.
a)
nii=te noane-naa ne
that=FOC lie-NOM be:3ps/E
'That is a lie.'
b)
nii-tQuru hjane-u=te kau-a ku-uru-ijie
that-PL leave-IMP=FOC return-NTR go-PL-JUSS
'Let them, so that they go home!'
In discourse, the spatial distinction between the three is not very strict and nii is
used much more frequently than kaa. The reason for this is that rtii is used under
many circumstances that are not exactly "close to the listener". In elicited
translation, when the context is not completely clear, nii is chosen as a kind of
default demonstrative. In narratives, nii has a discourse function, typically
referring to a noun that had already been introduced. In this case, the use of nii
does not imply that the described object is either close to the speaker or to the
listener. The example given in (322) illustrates this: in the first sentence, the
participants ( ' w o m a n ' and 'her daughter') are introduced. While sentence 2
contains 'her daughter's living place' as head of NP, sentence 3 does not
contain a noun that would refer to either participant. In sentence 4 then, 'her
daughter' is picked up again and this time, the NP is preceded by nii as an
anaphoric referral to a known participant (also cf. §22.4.2).
b) Sentence 2:
rautohwe-i=te niki raj kakunu ne-naha turu-e
calm-PRT=FOC ADVRS POSS daughter be-LPP arrive
'She safely arrived at her daughter's living place.'
[c) Sentence 3: 'Arriving, [she] said: "I have come to see you.'"]
d) Sentence 4:
nii hau=te raj lureri asae ni-a=ne here
that because=FOC POSS house under be-3ps/D=SUB want:3ps/E
mi raj kakunu
that POSS daughter
'Therefore, ["that"] her daughter wanted her to stay in her house.'
b) With nii:
nii lejhii katQa
that one man
'that one man'
In addition, the demonstratives also occur with proper nouns, such as names of
persons or locations, and with adverbs.
b) With adverb:
kaa ene netohwel
this now until
'until ("this") now'
There also is a compound composed of kaa + nii, which means 'something like
this/that'. Apart from being employed as a hesitation marker , it can be used as a
head of N P and as a verb stem (cf. (440)). Note that the demonstrative pronouns
can be shortened to ka=, ni=, and ta= when they function as a modifier (cf.
§2.11).
In combination with net (the participle form o f the copula), the form
ka-hia-ne-l Cthis'-LOC-'be'-PRT) is used to mean 'everywhere'. The
distinction for speaker reference is neutralised with this word.
a)
kahianei=te m atanihi
everywhere=FOC be:3ps/E mosquito
'There are mosquitoes everywhere'
b)
kahianei=te ama-ϊ hoitQa-rate-kure
everywhere=FOC take-PRT heal-CAU2-3pl/E
'They took him everywhere in order to have him healed.'
a)
kau=na neda-na here-u
here=FOC: 1 sg stay-INF want-lsg/E
Ί want to stay here.'
b)
aj, niu te-u-toe
do there give-IMP-PL
'Yes, (just) put it there!'
a) With kaa\ ;
kaalaj raj kuraanaa ne-it
this.area for chief be-lsg/E
Ί am the chief for this area.'
b) With mi:
niilaj kahe amu-u-tge ka=kioeraj-uru=ne hauria
that.area from walk-IMP-PL lsg=visitor=FOC: lsg first
ne-kabakabaaha-ni=t$a
ITR-bathe-DSTL.HORT=EMF
'Go over there, my visitors, since I first have to go take a bathe.'
a)
ka-eloo raj bihi lera te-1
this-DIR POSS hand toy give-PRT
'attaching toys to (the area of) his hands'
b)
lejhü-tQa ta-elöo helu+helu-ki-Ί beru herahauito-a ktt-e
one-only that-DIR RED+jump-DER-PRT way cross-NTR go-3ps/E
One [peccary] has crossed the way running towards that direction over there.'
a)
ku ne-rehete pasto taba-j
there be-HABl:3ps/E field be.big-NOMSbj
'There used to be a big field here'
b)
ku ajßa räasa-ure
there with dance-3pl/E
'They danced with her there'
a)
näi kanu atane ajriu kuane lejhü kurahe rajmöoro ne
there lsg land PLN inside one name-REP PSN be:3ps/E
'Over there in my place, the Airico, there was a man named Raimondo.'
b)
helaja näi ukiuana hana ku-e lejhü katQa
same.place there field inside go-3ps/E one man
Ά man went right there to his field (which was far away)'
c)
[Preceding: '... he returned from the Jordan ...']
ukuaae ni-a heena+tQurjka hanone-l=ße hana
there be-3ps/D four+ten-PRT day-PRT=SUB when
'when he was there for 40 days ...' [NT: Luke 4:2]
Indicating Non-indicatinc
3 Initio
Locational Directional
1 k/ialnj 1 k-mloo
2 niilaj 2 niildo
3 taalaj 3 hiclöo
5.7 Postpositions
(333) Postpositions
asae 'in/under'
The postposition asae is used with the meaning of 'in' or 'under', mainly with
objects that have a roof. These include the words for 'house', 'hut', 'shed', or
'church building'.
a)
nit lureri asae ni-akwa-e barue, itulere, inio-kuru
that house under be-DSTR-3ps/E masato all.kinds meat-PL
'There were masato, all kinds of things, different types of meat in that house'
b)
mi banaao asae
that shelter under
'under that leaf shelter'
Related to asae is asäa, which is typically used with reference to 'water' and
other liquids, meaning 'covered by' or 'deep inside'. In any case it is implied
that the object referred to has contact with the object it is covered by. Note that
this form is also used in combination with other postpositions that refer to a
similar semantic concept. These include hana and htatie, which both can be
translated as 'in/inside' (cf. (336), (338)).
a)
nala-a=ne hana jiäe asäa tom-a
drop-3ps/D=SUB when already deep.inside sound-3ps/A
'When he dropped it [the fruit], it sounded "inside" [the water = under water].'
b)
akau-ana asäa
water-inside deep, inside
c)
itanitQa hana asäa
mud inside deep.inside
'in the mud, covered by mud'
hana 'inside'
The postposition hana occurs with various kinds of nouns, which include
nature-related or spatial nouns like 'water', 'field', 'forest', but it is also found
with 'eye'. In opposition to asäa, hana does not imply that the object it refers to
would be covered. A distinction between location and direction is not relevant,
as the example 'he went to the field' (cf. (336a)) shows. In example (336d),
kaahana even implies 'in this (tree)', but this has to be understood from the
context as the sentence is from a story in which Adam spends an extended
period of time in a house-like tree. Otherwise, one would talk of being "on" a
tree (using fpoae; cf. (343)).
b) With 'puddle':
neru-a kutuka hana
play-3ps/A puddle inside
'He is playing in the puddle.'
c) With 'eye':
i=ßuta hana=ra
2sg=eye inside=EMF
'because o f you' [Idiomatic expression; lit. 'in your eyes']
Note that hana has a related form, which is attached to nouns as a suffix -ana.
The exact difference between the two is not entirely clear, as most speakers
characterise the two as identical. They can occur with the same nouns without
an apparent difference ('water' akau-ana ~ akau hana). Similarly, both forms
are found with 'forest' and 'bush', respectively. However, one speaker
described akau-ana as 'swimming in/on top of the water' and akau hana as
'standing in the water', for example when working with logs. If we follow this
hint, hana refers to a state in which an object is "deeper inside", but not
covered, while -ana mainly describes a state of being on the surface, but inside
a location, for instance, in the centre. Interestingly, two of the examples in (337)
are double-marked for location, as 'mud' and 'cÄevow' (a type of tree) each
carry the suffix -ana plus the locative marker -u. In this case, the meaning of
'covered by' is again implied. Another example with -ana is 'in the moonlight',
which makes any further interpretation of its semantic structure rather difficult.
(337) Use o f - a n a
a)
nuna hana=te ne
jungle inside=FOC be:3ps/E
'He lives in the jungle.' [= in the middle of the jungle]
b)
itanitg,a-ana-H
mud-inside-LOC
'inside the mud' [i.e. covered, which would not be the case if were absent]
c)
elelia-ana-u
chevon-inside-LOC
'in the chevon tree' [use in response to 'where?']
d)
atene kunu-ana
moon shine-inside
kuatie 'inside'
a) Margin:
tQäe tajbißaae-kuru eno-a-u bute kuane
also animal-PL enter-CAUl-IMP boat inside
'Also make the animals enter into the boat!'
b) Nature/Margin:
kaa ajtQune kuane eno-akaanu=ne hana
this PLN inside enter-lpl/ex=SUB when
'when we first entered the Espejo River'
c) Building/Content:
hua eno-a eruari kuane
don't enter-NTR mosquito.net inside
'Don't enter the mosquito net!'
d) Content:
beree amaema-he hetau unee bua kuane
child wander-CNT:3ps/E HRS kinkajou bag inside
'The kinkajou carries his child in a bag.'
e) Building:
lureri kuane-etg,a=na=ra ne-betaka-m here-u
house inside-only=FOC:lsg=EMF ITR-relax-INF want-1 sg/E
Ί want to relax only inside the house.'
f) Body:
arasihje siiri bihi kuane
star have:3ps/E hand inside
'He has got the stars in his hand.' [NT: Revelation 1:16]
Note that kuane is also used with 'water', but in this case 'inside' refers to
someone who stays on the surface, swimming, rather than being covered by
water. The difference with 'water' occurring with hana is that hana does not
necessarily refer to an object on the surface, but more to the fact that it is partly
covered as in the example where people stand in the water. In some examples,
such as (341), kuane is used as an instrumental postposition:
The table below summarises the differences between the various terms used for
'inside'.
This postposition again is used with a range of nouns. With some, it can mean
'on the surface', such as with 'land', 'tongue', 'beach', or 'floor'. On the other
hand, it is also found with 'tree' (in locational or directional sense, depending
on the verb that may be involved). In addition, tpoae may be used in a figurative
sense 'on top of (something)' to mean 'besides'. The shape or size of the
respective object is not relevant.
a) Direction:
kanu lele tgoae tohoeta-u-ra
lsg tongue on lay-IMP-EMF
'Put it onto my tongue!'
b) Passing over:
tgoae bauleneto-a nehere-kure enamhja kttane
on drive.over-NTR almost-3pl/E canoe inside
'They almost drove over him in (= by) the canoe.'
c) Figurative
tgäe=te tgu nii tgoae taka-i eshoela hoaauka-anu
also=FOC CRTN that on encounter-PRT school think-lps/A
'("Meeting") on top of that, I also think of [building] a school.'
mtgae 'near'
The word mtQae is used with an argument to express 'near', 'in the vicinity o f ,
or 'in the area o f . It also functions as a locational demonstrative and can be
defined as referring to a non-punctual location or direction (cf. (332)). In all
examples displayed in (344), the unspecified character of the location is given
by the context. The directional function is illustrated in (344c), where the
context makes a translation as 'towards' more appropriate.
a) Location:
akau nitg,ae
water near
'close to the water' [about the location of crocodiles]
b) Direction:
na-1 hetau akauru mtQae rialaeto-a
say-PRT HRS 3pl near throw-3ps/A
'Saying so, she launched [the shells] towards them.'
kahe 'from'
The postposition 'from' is multifunctional. It is used not only with nouns that
refer to a location, but also in an abstract sense with 'people' (e.g. 'learn from
somebody'), kahe can also be used in a temporal sense with adverbs of time;
however, in this case, the participle form o f ' c r e a t e ' , hoaaunei is added to mean
'beginning from'.
a) With location:
dede kahe=te hiua-e
sky from=FOC descend-3ps/E
'She came from heaven.'
c) With humans:
kahjwie kaja-hahoa-uru-a katqa-uru kahe
clothes seize-DSTR-PL-3ps/A man-PL from
'They took the clothes away from the people.'
f) With numeral:
sauki kahe=te nitgataha-l setu-e ate
five from=FOC three-PRT rot-3ps/E fish
'Three out of the five fish have rotted.' [Elicited]
g) Indicating material:
hoata kahe itQa-noi
iron from make-PASS
'made of iron'
i) Temporal meaning:
eresi kahe kwaaune-i
tomorrow from create-PRT
'from tomorrow on' [Lit. 'creating from tomorrow']
kaihje 'behind'
This postposition is found with h u m a n s only. Its meaning ' b e h i n d ' is strictly
locational or directional (not temporal); it can also be used metaphorically in the
sense o f ' b e h i n d s o m e o n e ' s b a c k ' .
a)
akauru kaihje ini-a ku-a
3pl behind go.up-NTR go-3ps/A
'She climbed behind them.'
b)
kaihje muku-na heri-a-ne hana
behind catch-INF want-3ps/D=SUB when
'when he wanted to catch her [running] behind/after her'
c)
kaihje turu-1 fioanara basihjau-a
behind arrive-PRT banana steal-3ps/A
'He stole bananas behind [someone's back].'
ahinia 'before'
a) Temporal:
kanakaanu ahinia barue ahu-u=ra
lpl/ex before masato mash-IMP=EMF
'Prepare masato before we arrive!'
b) Locational:
hana=te n=ahima ne-ure arahit katQa-uru
instead=FOC 3ps=before be-3pl/E many man-PL
'And there were many people [standing] before him.' [NT: Matthew 21:8]
c) Variant ahntga:
kanu ahutga ne enua
lsg before be:3ps/E tree
'The tree is [standing] before me.'
tial 'until'
Urarina has several terms for 'until', one of which is tial. This postposition is
generally used in an inherently directional sense. However, there also is the
postposition reetiai, where the meaning of /ree/ is unclear. This form has
temporal meaning, occurring after adverbs of time or after verbs.
b) Temporal use:
hauria hitarii letQuyka-j katga rela-i=jie reetiai nihjauria
first all ten-NOMSbj man teach-2ps=SUB until don't
be-i=jie
tell-2ps=NEGF
'In the beginning do not tell [them] anything until you have taught all ten persons [how
to do it]!'
uahei 'until'
Another term for 'until' is uahei, which probably is a fossilised form of 'come'-
CNT-PRT, to mean 'coming'. The difference with tial lies in the fact that uahei
is continuing, while tial and reetiai define locational or temporal "boundaries".
For instance, in example (348a) 'up to the spot ...' refers to the endpoint of an
area to be cleared, whereas hi uahei (cf. (349a)) implies a temporary stop on a
trip that is to be continued.
a)
ku(-atQa) uahei
there(-only) until
'until there [and then going on]'
b)
ena nerereta-re-u=ni ßaa-hi-anu=ne haa ke uahei
now tell-IRR-1 sg/E=ASS know-CNT-lsg/A=SUB PURP VLI until
'Now I will tell stories as far as I know.' [but implying that he may know more]
netohwei 'until'
a) Reference to present:
ena netohwei=te ne ißono ku-1 nii ajßa ne-nakauru
now until=FOC be:3ps/E ayahuasca drink-PRT that with be-those.who
'Until now there are those who live with that, drinking ayahuasca.'
b) Reference to future:
ajane rihihei ßoaelu netohwei kajritgi ne-ι ne-ri-h-tQe=l
like.that ever until poor.person be-PRT be-IRR-2ps-PL=ASS
'Being like that, you will live being poor people forever.'
baja 'after'
The word baja is used with a temporal function for 'after'. It frequently follows
the demonstrative nii, to mean 'after that', 'then'. Baja is not very widely
attested as postposition, but mainly occurs as a conjunction in combination with
the subordinate marker (cf. §5.8). In fact, there are no examples in the text
database where it occurs after full nouns. There are a number of examples
attested in the NT in which baja occurs after a pronoun, and two cases in which
it co-occurs with the nouns for 'death' and 'day', respectively.
b) After pronoun:
kann baja=te u-re=~i lejhii
lsg after=FOC come-IRR:3ps/E=ASS one
'After me, one will come ...' [NT: Matthew 3:11]
The form baja-hiri-i is a derivation that involves suffixes for diminutive and
participle and is used to mean 'a little later'.
bana 'when'
In the same way as baja, the word bana can function as a postposition or as a
conjunction (cf. §5.8). It has a temporal meaning and is translated as 'at the time
o f . It is used predominantly with the demonstrative.
a) With demonstrative:
nii bana hetau=te
that when HRS=FOC
'in those days (it is said)'
b) With weekdays:
tomijo bana-te nebetaka-e
Sunday when=FOC relax-3ps/E
O n Sunday(s), he relaxes.'
c) With nominalisation:
jwaelu kana ne-huaau-naa bana
earlier lpl/in ITR-create-NOM when
'earlier, at the time of our creation'
kurenia 'for'
The postposition kurenia is probably related to the root /kure/ that occurs with
the meaning for 'change, exchange', and recently also for 'price'. Related words
include hiretia 'buy, change for', (which can be segmented into /kure/ and /tia/
a) Beneficiary:
kana+kwaaun-era kurenia=ne itQau-akaanu
lpl/in+create-AG for=FOC:lpI live-lpl/ex
'We live for God.'
b) Maleficiary:
mtoanei ne i=toej kurenia=ra
like.that be:3ps/E 2sg-for for=EMF
'It shall be like that for you [forever].' [Meant as a curse]
c) Exchange:
kalaui kohvaerati-a aräala kurenia-nemaahel
son defend-3ps/A tapir for-also
'He [the jaguar] defended his baby and also for [i.e. in order to get] the tapir [the jaguar
attacked].'
d) Payment:
kurete-ri-tQäH=rü kaa kurenia
pay-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS this for
Ί will pay for this.'
e) Source
naria ebanhelio, ramo kurenia leotQa-uru misjonero kurenia
thanks Gospel PSN for other-PL missionary for
'Thanks [= due] to the Gospel, thanks to Ramon, thanks to the other missionaries [we
live in peace].'
Note that the example in (356b) resembles the one in (355a) 'we live for God'
and mainly differs by the use of postposition. In fact, the difference between
kurenia and raj in this particular context is marginal; kurenia appears to
emphasise the beneficial character. However, the recipient function of kurema is
only one of three different options, while for raj it is the only function. Since
kurenia is more specialised in its meaning, it can be assumed that it expresses
the benefit (or misfit) in a stronger way than raj does.
One additional function of raj is in expressions that refer to obligation (cf.
§18.3). In general, this involves the construction ne+te+ne, which is a
combination of subordinate marker plus focus marker, plus copula, literally 'it
is that'. As a variant of this construct, the focus marker =te can be preceded or
replaced by raj, which results in a literal translation as 'it is for that'. Even
though the three components of this form can still be identified, it appears to be
lexicalised, or it is on the way to being lexicalised, as the variation between
netene and neraj(te)ne may suggest.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Postpositions 241
a)
satit ku-i-toe nerajße
all drink-2ps-PL must
'You all must drink it.'
b)
atauari su-anu nerajtene
chicken kill-lsg/D must
Ί must kill a chicken.'
hilane 'without'
a)
itQafiua kulane=te ne-ure=lu katQa-uru
rifle without=FOC be-3pI/E=REM man-PL
'The people lived without rifles.'
b)
nijej d^a kulane
not.at.all what without
'Without anything at all [I had to defend myself].'
that may refer to an abstract concept such as 'this (situation)'. At first sight,
ajßa may seem to be a phrase conjunction, as in the example 'Juan and
Manuel' (cf. (359a); however, the context implies that this is to be read as
'Manuel with Juan'. In addition, the verb in this example appears in the 3sg
form, which indicates that it is Manuel who goes, but in the company of Juan.
Beyond that, there are very few examples, which would appear to conjoin two
nouns or other syntactic phrases with each other. Thus, it can be concluded that
ajßa is a postposition. The example in (359b), ajßa occurs without an overt
argument, because it refers to a 3ps object pronoun, which is typically omitted.
c) Inanimate referent:
kunaj ajßa=te hatal nekajritga-e
sickness with=FOC very suffer-3ps/E
'He has suffered a lot with illness.'
d) Inanimate referent:
saabere ajßa neda-a=ne hau
machete with remain-3ps/D=SUB because
'because [the rifle] had remained with the machete'
e) Abstract referent:
ni-a mi ajßa ne-nakauru katga-uru
be-3ps/A that with be-those.who man-PL
'There are people who live with that (ayahuasca drinking).'
Ajßa is also used in expressions such as nii hau ajßa te ('that' + 'because' +
'with'=FOC), literally meaning 'with (the situation being) because of that'.
sajhjei 'despite o f
Another postposition that is also used as a subordinate conjunction is sajhjei
'although'. It is only attested with the demonstrative nii 'that' to mean
'nevertheless', but does not occur with any other nouns. It can also occur as the
variant asajhjei, with no apparent condition.
a)
mi sajhjei be-naa here-ne
that despite tell-INF want-NEG:3ps/E
'Nevertheless [even though they urged her], she did not want to tell.'
b)
nii asajhjei nijej ere-naa towre-lanaala ke-et$a balubalubaluu-ka
that despite not.at.all speak-NOM obey-PRV VLI-only embrace-3ps/A
'Nevertheless, without obeying, he embraced only her.'
käu 'because o f
The postposition käu refers to the reason of source of an action or event and can
be translated as 'because o f , 'out or' or 'due to'.
a)
atane huu-ka akau=ne hana nesoone käu d^ana-i
land flood-3ps/D water=SUB when fear because.of ciy-PRT
'As the water flooded the earth, [they were] crying for fear and said ...'
b)
hatal eluna-i hoasi-jia käu hetau aj
very be.terrorised-PRT be.scared-NOM because.of HRS AUX:3ps/E
nii ranuna
that girl
'Being so terrorised, the girl did it out of fear.'
There are two more terms that can be used with the demonstrative, but their
main function is as clause conjunctions. These are two words for 'while',
tonoana and najrtia. With nii, they are translated as 'in the meantime', 'during
that'. With other nouns, their use is not attested. Their structure will be further
discussed in §5.8. In the same way, the word kujfla 'so that', which mainly
functions as a purposive subordinate conjunction, can follow a demonstrative to
express 'for that purpose'. However, its use in this function is very rare.
The table in (362) gives an overview of postpositions and their occurrence
with nouns and as conjunctions. Two types of postpositions are predominant:
those that occur with nouns and demonstratives, but do not function as
conjunctions (Type A), and those that can take this function in addition to their
function as postpositions (Type B). Three postpositions (Type C) only occur
with demonstratives and as conjunctions, but not with other nouns. Three other
postpositions are unattested with demonstratives; the word netohzuei is peculiar
as it only occurs after temporal adverbs. A further feature which allows to
distinguish the various postpositions is their reference to location or direction.
Type B:
ham 'inside' yes yes yes both
kahe •from' yes yes yes DIR
ahima 'before' yes yes yes LOC
bana 'at the time yes yes yes none
when'
baja 'after' yes yes yes none
Type C:
tomana 'while' yes no yes none
najnia 'while' yes no yes none
sajhjel 'although' yes no yes none
kujpa 'so that' yes no yes none
hvataa 'so that not' yes no yes none
hijßa 'so that' yes no yes none
Others:
nitQae 'near' unattested yes no both
tia~i 'until' unattested yes no DIR
uahei 'until' unattested ? no DIR
netohwei 'until' no no no none
5.8 Conjunctions
example in (363b) is elicited and was given as a possible translation for 'you
and P. The use of naaohwaa in (363c), where it occurs in the participle form,
illustrates the listing of a number of food items. However, naaohwaa can also
function as to "list" a chain of dependent clauses. In example (363d) naaohwaa
occurs in the 3pl/E form and refers to an enumeration of events, here expressed
through two participle clauses (also cf. §5.16).
a)
fwanara take
banana egg
'plantain and egg' [a meal]
b)
kanu ii
lsg 2sg
'you and me'
c)
ku ne imo, itulere, fioanara, laano, naaohwa-i
there be:3ps/E meat all.kinds banana cassava ENUM-PRT
'There was meat - all kinds of things, bananas and cassava.'
d)
raj mnaae+buku ra-l, bajbihi ra-ϊ, riaaohwa-ure
POSS leg+bone receive-PRT upper.poles receive-PRT ENUM-3pl/E
'Taking its vertical poles and taking the upper poles, they do it.' [about house-building]
As seen in the previous section, Urarina has a number of words that can take
postpositional or conjunctional function. In fact, all subordinate conjunctions,
(which are listed in (364)), except for kttreu 'after' and hanamane 'if are
attested as postpositions after the demonstrative nii. Their main use is as
subordinate clause conjunctions, i.e. they normally follow a verb. Following
this, one could alternatively analyse conjunctions as actual postpositions that
can take a dependent clause as an argument. Except for tQäe and riete, which
function as clause coordinators, all Urarina conjunctions introduce a subordinate
clause. These follow the subordinate enclitic =ne, which is attached to the last
element of the clause. No elements can occur between =ne and a conjunction;
however, the subordinate marker may be omitted in a subordinate construction.
=ne also has a variety of functions as accompanied by a conjunction, it can
introduce a temporal or conditional clause (cf. §20.1.1). Also note that the verb
(364) Conjunctions
a) Subordinate conjunctions (with subordinate marker =ne):
Temporal: hana 'when'
bana 'at the time when'
ahirna 'before'
baja 'after'
kureu 'after'
tonoana 'while'
najrda 'while', 'whereas'
kahe 'from' (Temporal and locational)
Others: hau 'as/because' (Reason)
kujßa 'in order to' (Purpose)
huataa '(in order) that not' (Purpose)
sajhjel 'although' (Concessive function)
hanardane 'if (Condition)
rihihei 'like' (cf. §5.4.6) (Comparison)
tokuanei 'compared to', 'like' (cf. §5.4.6) (Comparison)
b) Clause coordinators:
tgäe 'also'
ne+te 'but'
hana 'when'
The conjunction hana is mainly employed to mark a subordinate clause related
to time. However, there is some interesting relation to discourse structure, as
will be examined in §22.4.5. In particular, this regards the relation between
hana and häu (cf. §5.8.2; §22.4.5).
a)
amu-a=ne hana=te su-e hanolari
walk-3ps/D=SUB when=FOC kiII-3ps/E jaguar
'When he went (hunting), a jaguar killed him.'
b)
haurianehe-1 kaa ajtgune kuane eno-akaanu=m hana
for.the.first.time this PLN inside enter-lpl/ex=SUB when
ri-ei=lu ne-naanaha
be-NEG:3ps/A=REM be-LPP
'When we entered this (river) Espejo for the first time, there was no place to live.'
To account for the semantic and functional difference between the conjunctions
hau and harm, which are the two most frequently used ones, is a challenge. A
clue towards a solution may lie in the semantic difference in their use with the
demonstrative nii. In this context, the meaning is invariably 'therefore' for
nii hau, but 'then' for nii hana. Any similarities in function or semantic content
thus occurs in relation to discourse; this will be analysed in §22.4.5 on
discourse.
bana 'when'
There is a certain degree of overlap in the meaning of bana and hana. The
conjunction bana is generally much less frequent than hana. In correspondence
to its occurrence in postpositional function, it refers to a time or era, rather than
a particular event. In contrast, hana indicates the time of a particular event.
While one might suspect from this a relation to habitual aspect, this is not the
case. The presence of bana is not restricted to a certain verb type, nor associated
to a particular type of aspect marking, as the examples in (366) illustrate.
a)
ne-ni-a iglesia=ne bana
be-NEG-3ps/D church=SUB when
'(at the time) when there was no church'
b)
hanulari su-anu=lu=ne bana
jaguar kill-lsg/D=REM=SUB when
'(at the time) when I killed jaguars'
ahinia 'before'
a)
dosmildos ke turu-si-a=ne ahinia hestjona-anu nerajtene
2002 VLI arrive-CPL-3ps/D=SUB before delegate-lsg/D must
Ί must delegate it before the year 2002 arrives.'
b)
eno-aka=ne ahinia nukue kuane hveta-aka
enter-lpl/du=SUB before river inside clear-lpl/du
'Before we enter the river, we clear it [of logs].'
baja 'after'
Similar to its use as a postposition, its occurrence of baja with a subordinate
clause has a temporal function and focuses on the sequence or order of events.
a)
setu-ahva-a enua=ne baja kau ßäe ne-naha
rot-DSTR-3ps/D tree=SUB after here already be-LPP
ti-a u-akaanu=ln
give-NTR come-1 pl/ex=REM
'After the trees rotted one by one [in the other place], we already came here to make a
place to live.'
b)
raneto-a lomaj beene=ne baja hetau
weave.cloth PSN female=SUB after HRS
'After Lomai had been weaving, [she said ...]'
kureu 'after'
a)
ikito ku-anu=ne kureu=te u-e naao
PLN go-lsg/D=SUB after=FOC die-3ps/E PSN
'After I had gone to Iquitos, Naao died.'
b)
lenom-a=ne kureu amiani-a ku-e
eat-3ps/D=SUB after work-NTR go-3ps/E
'After he had eaten, he went to work.'
Urarina has three different strategies to express the concept of ' w h i l e ' , and the
differences between these are marginal. While one morpheme for while is a
suffix, there are two words that function as a subordinate conjunction. As
illustrated in (370), the conjunction tonoana is used to refer to actions or events
that occur simultaneously.
a)
amiani-akaanu=ne tonoana nebetaka-ure leotQa-uru
work-lpl/ex=SUB while relax-3pl/E other-PL
'While we are working, the others are relaxing.'
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Conjunctions 251
b)
tQoaetQani-a ku-a kitQa=ne tonoana=te kaihje ku-e eene
go.ahead-NTR go-3ps/D man=SUB while=FOC behind go-3ps/E woman
'While the man went ahead, the woman went behind.'
The other conjunction for 'while' is najrna. Unlike tonoana, najrna has a
contrastive function, by which it sets the action described in the subordinate
clause in contrast to the action of the main clause. For instance, the same
sentence as the first example in (370) is possible with najnia instead of tonoana.
The difference in meaning is explained through contrast, which, for instance,
can be manifested by the fact that with najma, the two groups of people do not
work together in the same place. A possible translation for the first sentence in
(371) would thus be with 'whereas'.
a)
amiani-akaanu=ne najma nebetaka-ure leotQa-uru
work-lpl/ex=SUB while relax-3pl/E other-PL
'Whereas/while we are working, the others are relaxing.'
b)
kau m-akaanu=ne najma, estadosunidos ne ramoo
here be-lpl/ex=SUB while PLN be:3ps/E PSN
'Whereas/while we are here, Ramön is in the United States.'
Note that 'while' may also be expressed by a verbal suffix -lai (also cf. §20.4).
The main difference to the two conjunctions discussed here is that -lai only
occurs with same subject function.
kahe 'from'
The word kahe is relatively rare as a conjunction, whereas it is more frequently
used as a postposition. Similar to its use after nouns, it also has locational
function when following a clause. However, a temporal component is always
given through the context, as illustrated in the examples in (372). For instance,
the fact that 'they have returned from fishing' (which is meant as an indication
of the direction), automatically implies that the process of fishing occurred
earlier in the timeline than the return.
a)
pae kau-a ku-uru-a ate kuhivu-uru-a=ne kahe
already return-NTR go-PL-3ps/D fish fish.with.hook-PL-3ps/D=SUB from
'They already go home from fishing.' [Lit. 'from catching fish']
b)
ajto-a nil ranuna=ne kahe kmtuku-i
say-3ps/D that girl=SUB from know-NEG:3ps/A
'They don't know [it] from what the girl says.'
häu 'because'
a)
tasißohwa-a hau=te kana kasate
be.big-3ps/D because=FOC lpl/in frighten:3ps/E
'Because it is big, it frightens us.' [About jaguar]
b)
ku kwara-1, hatai kauato-a häu, here-Ί, muku-t ajpa
there see-PRT very be.nice-3ps/D because want-PRT catch-PRT with
räasa-ure
dance-3pl/E
'They saw her, and because she was very beautiful, they desired her and danced with
her.'
a)
mi häu=te tururi molo-ore ruku-uru-a=ne kujßa
that because=FOC llanchama.Xree cut-3pl/E pull.out-PL-3ps/D=SUBso.that
'Therefore, they cut the llanchama tree in order to pull her out.'
b)
satonohei=te ikito-o ama-ure hoitQa-kuru-a doktoro-kuru=ne kujßa
in.the.end=FOC PLN-LOC take-3pl/E heal-PL-3ps/D doctor-PL=SUB so.that
'In the end, they brought him to Iquitos so that the doctors (would) cure him.
a)
itga-u eno-a akau=ne huataa
do-IMP enter-3ps/D water=SUB so.that.not
'Do it so that the water (would) not enter!'
b)
anofwa dada-a kanu beree=ne hoataa ajto-o
knife touch-3ps/D lsg child=SUB so.that.not say-lsg/E
Ί said it so that my child would not touch the knife.'
c)
nabana hoena-uru-a=ne hvataa enuhe tauhja-1,
that.not laugh-PL-3ps/D=SUB so.that.not pepper collect-PRT
sajhjei 'although'
a)
enua ari-anu=ne sajhjei ne-ni-a=na hau, nii baja
tree seek-lsg/D=SUB although be-NEG-3ps/D=SUB because that after
'even though I looked for a stick, (as) there was none, [but] then ...'
b)
na-a=ne asajhjel hetau ku aua-na here-lanaala
say-3ps/D=SUB although HRS there hear-INF want-PRV
ku balubalubaluu-ka hau
there embrace-3ps/D because
'though she spoke like this, (as) he did not listen and kept on embracing her ...'
c) Meaning 'even':
nehelau ninitQU kohvajtQa-kuru nianatn=te nitoanei uhoana ha-ure
other.side PLN inhabitant-PL even=FOC like.that field make-3pl/E
'Even the people from the other side of the Rio Chambira made their fields like that.'
hanamam ' if
The conjunction hanamane is used to emphasise irrealis in a subordinate clause,
explicitly referring to an unfulfilled condition (also cf. §20.1.1.3). Irrealis is not
marked as a suffix on the verb of the dependent clause; the hypothetical status
of the clause is solely indicated by the conjunction. However, irrealis can be
marked in the main clause (which is not obligatory). In (378a), the conditional
function of the dependent clause is additionally emphasised by the introducer
baana (cf. §5.10.6); one of the clauses of this sentence is marked for irrealis. In
(378b), the main clause has irrealis inflection.
a)
baana itQuuni-a=ne hananiane raj kalaui-tQuru muku-akat(x
if be.near-3ps/D=SUB if POSS son-PL catch-lpl/in
'If its creatures had been near, we would have caught it [about a peccary].'
b)
d^a siiri-tgau hananiane nix itga-re
what have-lsg/D if that do-IRR:3ps/E
'He would do that if I had what?'
tQäe 'also'
There is only one monomorphemic word that can have coordinating function
between two clauses, t$äe 'also'. Its function is restricted to the coordination of
clauses or sentences. An alternative translation of tgäe is 'besides'. It generally
occurs in initial position of the second clause, but deviation from this may
occur. A few peculiarities regarding its syntactic behaviour are discussed in
chapter 20.5 on coordination. One might also argue that t$äe is an adverb that
operates on the clause level. However, there also are reasons that favour its
treatment as a multifunctional word which includes its function as a
conjunction: firstly, its typical occurrence between clauses or sentences, which
is untypical for all other adverbs (also cf. §18.4.2) and, secondly, its function to
relate information given in separate clauses or sentences, rather than modify a
verb.
a)
bute haa-u kuane eno-a akau=ne hoataa-ra
boat make-IMP inside enter-3ps/D water=SUB so.that.not=EMF
b)
nil hau hetau=te, t$äe ßäe ne-molo-a raj misi=ße
that because HRS=FOC also already ITR-cut-3ps/D POSS umbilical.cord=CND
nete 'but'
nete is a clause coordinating conjunction for 'but', focussing on
counterexpectation. It conjoins two clauses or sentences.
a)
m=a=lu enua kauatQa nete ßäe enene ne-ene
be-3ps/A=REM tree good but already nowadays be-NEG:3ps/E
'There was good wood, but now there isn't any more.'
b)
teru siiri-a-ü nete kann iteasu=te siiri
axe have-NEG-lsg/E but lsg brother=FOC have:3ps/E
Ί don't have an axe, but my brother has [one].'
a) Variant nene:
aum-kau, ne+ne hoara-ene-u
hear-1 sg/A SUB+FOC:lsg see-NEG-1 sg/E
Ί heard it, but I did not see it.'
b) Variant nete:
auna-käu, ne+te hoara-ene-ü
hear-1 sg/A SUB+FOC see-NEG-1 sg/E
Ί heard it, but I did not see it.'
There is another reason which suggests that nete is on its way to being
lexicalised (which is why it is glossed as monomorphemic 'but' elsewhere).
Firstly, a verb that is preceded by a focus marker (such as =te) always occurs in
the Ε-form (cf. §11.2). However, this is not obligatory when nete precedes the
verb. The Ε-form can be chosen as well as the Α-form, which shows that the
grammatical peculiarities of the focus marker as a component of nete have been
neutralised.
5.9 Interrogatives
Urarina has only one basic interrogative of which all others are derived. d$a is
the word for 'what/who', which is combined with other morphemes in order to
express other interrogative concepts. The component d$a surfaces in all these
interrogatives except in the word for 'where'. However, it is plausible to assume
that d$u is a fossilised form of d$a plus the locative marker -u. The loss of /a/
would thus be due to lexicalisation. The list in (383) contains the most
important combinations of d$a with other elements. A complete analysis is
given in §21.1.
(383) Interrogatives
'what/who'
d^a-nu 'why' (with PURP)
d$a-toane-i 'how' (with verbal DER)
d^a-bana 'when' (with postposition 'when')
d$a-elöo 'what(ever) way' (with DIR)
dyu 'where' (with LOC)
The clause introducers nihjauria and hjauijie (or variant βaauipe) 'don't'
function as "strong" prohibitive introducers (cf. §15.2.1). Their presence is
associated with the clause final negative enclitic =ne. The verb is also marked
for 2ps (-2) when any of the two are used as a direct command. Subsequently, in
the plural, the verb carries suffixes for 2ps and plural, followed by the final
enclitic. The final emphatic enclitic =ra can follow in addition and is attached
to =ne. Also note that nihjauria and hjauiße occur in sentence-initial position
and that a subordinate clause may occur between the introducer and the main
verb, such as in (386b) and (387b) where a participle clause occurs in this
position, and in (387a) where the intervening subordinate clause has a
temporal/conditional function.
b) Plural:
nihjauria huajtei nakiuaaunel ne-tabataka-he-1 turu-i-tQe=ne=ra
don't again again ITR-reduce-CNT-PRT arrive-2ps-PL=NEGF=EMF
'Don't (PL) return again being reduced in number!'
The example in (387c) even exhibits a rare double use of the final negative
marker, occurring after the verb and after the adverb that follows the verb.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Clause introducers 261
Possibly, hauria is meant as juxtaposition to the clause and is marked with the
enclitic in order to indicate that it is still in the scope of the negation (otherwise
one would expect the marker to occur only once - after the adverb).
a)
nihjauria kati eru-i-ße, saate-i=ße
don't black.monkey meet-2ps=CND kill-2ps=NEGF
'When you meet a black monkey, do not kill him!'
b)
mhjauria kanu kururu-1 ka=kiuara-i-ße-ra
don't lsg hide-PRT lsg=see-2ps=NEGF-EMF
'Don't watch me [by] hiding yourself.'
c)
nihjauria be-i-ße hauria=ne
don't tell-2ps=NEGF first=NEGF
'Don't tell anyone at first [but only later]!'
Prohibitive introducers are also used with 3ps subjects. These take the regular
suffix for 3ps/A in this context. The final negative enclitic =?ie is attached to the
end of the clause.
a)
nihjauria tQäe kati saate-nana-a=nel
don't also black.monkey kill-ILT-3ps/A=NEGF
'His compadre must not kill black monkeys!'
b)
nihjauria nii rihihei eno-ana-a=ne
don't that like enter-ILT-3ps/A=NEGF
'His compadre must not enter like that!'
a)
lava kuruata-sa-1 ti-a
don't two-times-PRT give-NTR
'Don't tell it twice!'
b)
hua hjä=ra uba-hei ajto-a=ra
don't just=EMF be.angry-PRT say-NTR=EMF
'Don't speak in anger!'
Plural is marked on the verb, as well as the polite form (which is identical to the
plural for 2ps and can only be distinguished by the context). In both cases, /tpe/
(which is a suffix for plural marking but an enclitic for politeness marking) is
suffixed to the verb (also cf. § 12.2.16.1).
a) Plural:
hua ubaae-ka-tge
don't be.angry-NTR-PL
'Don't (PL) get angry!'
34
This statement is hypothetical as no examples for 3ps are attested. However, the fact
that 2ps is not explicitly marked indicates that person marking is neutralised in this
form.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Clause introducers 263
b) Plural:
kwa ka=su-a-t$e=ra
don't 1 sg=kill-PL=EMF
'Don't (PL) kill me!'
c) Polite:
kwa bi-a=t$e
don't tell-NTR=PLT
'Don't tell him!' [Polite; man talking to woman]
a) hoatia by itself:
ka=hitQihi ke ni-a=ne hoatia kauatg,a-ri-ji=ta
this=side VLI be-3ps/D=CND not good-IRR-NEG:3ps/A=FRS
'If it is in this manner, it would not be good!'
b) With nijej:
mjei hoatia hoeru-i=lu ajtQune kuane
not.at.all not be.clear-NEG:3ps/A=REM PLN inside
'The Espejo (river) was not cleared at all.'
c) With hjauijiera:
hjauijiera, hoatia ne-hi-ßi kaa ßaara atane
no not be-DIM-NEG:3ps/A this 2pl land
'No! Your world is not big.' [Lit. 'your world is not anything']
d) With nitokioara:
nitohoara, hoatia i=tQoara-ri-a-u=ni-ta
no not 2sg=see-IRR-NEG-1 sg/E=ASS=FRS
'No! I won't watch you.'
Note that there is another word related to the negative, which is the conjunction
kiuataa 'so that not', mentioned earlier (cf. §5.8.2). A further introducer that
resembles kwa at least phonologically, is the hortative introducer huane, though
it is not related to negation.
a)
huane ra-e
let's receive-HORT
'Let me get it!' [Said by character who is about to grab an axe]
b)
kioane=na kau kuhwa-~i huara-e=ra
let's=FOC:lsg here wait-PRT see-HORT=EMF
'Here I will wait and see' [Said by character who is hiding in order to watch what will
happen]
Examples that exhibit the form -ni represent the result of merging between the
distal suffix -ni and the hortative -e (cf. §15.1.2).
a)
hoane hoaa-ni-0
let's see-DSTL:HORT
'Let me go to see!'
b)
huane hauria ahajna-ana ku-ni-0-tga
let's first forest-inside go-DSTL:HORT-EMF
'Let me go into the bush first!'
a)
nabana hvena-kuru-a=ne kioataa enuhe tauhja-1 ... ku-ure
that.not laugh-PL-3ps/D=SUBso.that.not pepper gather-PRT go-3pl/E
'They went,... putting peppers in their mouths so that they would not laugh.'
b)
nabana aheri ke ne-kunajtaa-i=ße huataa
that.not stone INST ITR-hurt-2ps=SUB so.that.not
'so that you don't get hurt by a stone' [NT: Luke 4:11]
Another optional introducer is baana, which occurs with conditional clauses and
reinforces the condition ' i f . It is comparatively rare and only attested in very
few examples, baana co-occurs with the subordinate enclitic =ne when this is
used as a conditional marker, or with the word hananiane ' i f (cf. §20.1.1.3).
a)
baana ii here-i=ße hananiane kanu kuruatahane-i
if 2sg want-2ps=CND if lsg help-2ps
'If you want, you can help me.'
b)
baana ßaara here-ki-tpe=ne hananiane kanaka ana reroa-ri-i-toe
if 2pl want-2ps-PL=CND if lpl/ex replace-IRR-2ps-PL
'If you (PL) wanted, you (PL) would replace us.'
a)
ta u-ri-ki- ße
NEGQ come-IRR-2ps=NEGF
'Won't you come?'
b)
ta ate ra-uru-a katQa-uru=ne=ta
NEGQ fish receive-PL-3ps/A man-PL=NEGF=FRS
'Have the people not caught any fish?'
a)
d^atera läatpa tur-a-riu
how.about ship arrive-CAUl-SUG: lsg
'How [nice would it be] if I made the ship arrive!'
b)
d$atera hitarn kau tete-riu
how.about all here make-SUG:lsg
'What if I put all [those things] here?' [Talking about items that some one else had
promised.]
5.11 Quantifiers
Most (if not all) Urarina quantifiers are derived or belong to other word classes:
while the majority can be analysed as fossilised participle forms of verbs, others
resemble nouns with regard to their syntactic and morphological properties. It is
not always possible to identify the original base of each quantifier, but their
morphological complexity is always evident from at least one known
component. In (399), a list of quantifiers is given, followed by a detailed
description for each. The list also includes some indication of the known parts.
(399) Quantifiers
a) As head of NP:
bihi-tga ke=te itulere itQa-kure=lu katQa-uru
hand-only INST=FOC all.kinds do-3pl/E=REM man-PL
'The people did everything with their hands.'
c) As modifier:
m-a itulere rukuele kioata kahe it^a-noi
be-3ps/A all.kinds things metal from make-PASS
'There were all kinds of things made of iron'
This quantifier is a reduplication of the word for ' g r o u p ' or ' k i n d ' , lauri, which
is also used on its own, sometimes together with the short form of the numeral
f o r ' o n e ' (as in example (401c)). It can function both as a nominal head and as a
modifier, occurring in prenominal or postnominal position. W h e n it functions as
head of N P , its reduplication refers to plurality ('all groups'). However, note
that reduplication is not in general a productive strategy for pluralisation (cf.
§10.3).
a) Head of NP:
lauri+lauri kahe kuraanaa beene naaohwa-i-tQa
RED+group from chief female ENUM-PRT-only
'From the various (species) [choose] a male and a female!'
b) Head of NP:
lauri+lauri kahe u-nakauru
RED+group from come-those.who
'those who come from all the [other] communities'
c) Prenominal modifier:
nitoanei hetau=te edara ne-1 amu-ure=lu le=lauri
like.that HRS=FOC water.people be-PRT walk-3pl/E=REM one=group
katQa arahtt
man many
Ά large group of people was transformed into water people like that.'
d) Postnominal modifier:
lenone lauri+lauri
food RED+group
'various types of food' [i.e. of all kinds, from different places]
A form derived from tabaa 'be big' is used as a quantifier for 'some (people)',
used with humans only. This term is formed by suffixation of the noun plural
-uru to the (otherwise verbal) root. Tabauru is used as a nominal head with
quantifying function. In addition, it also appears to modify a noun, as examples
from the NT show. However, an alternative analysis of the modifier
construction in (402b) would be to describe tabauru as a nominal head of a
possessive construction 'some of the women'. This would make sense in so far
as tabauru never occurs as a modifier in prenominal position, whereas most
other quantifiers are variable in their position.
b) Modifier:
eene-kuru tabauru
woman-PL some
'some (of the) women' [NT: Mark 15:40]
The participle form of the verb tabaa 'be big' is used to refer to 'much, a lot' in
an uncountable sense. Its position can either be preverbal or postverbal. Note
that it is used with adverbial function and does not modify a noun.
a)
tabai hja-a häu hetau=te
much urinate-3ps/D because HRS=FOC
'as she urinated very much'
b)
tabäi=te ne inio aräala su-uru-a=ne
much=FOC be:3ps/E meat tapir kill-PL-3ps/D=CND
'There was meat in abundance when they killed the tapirs.'
Apart from the verb äatQihia 'be little' (cf. (280)), the expression kuruatahe-1 is
used to refer to small quantities. Literally, it is the participle form of the verb for
' t w o ' , thus 'being two'.
a)
nii häu=te lejhlßehü kauti-a=ne here-kur-ene
that because=FOC not.even.one remain-3ps/D=SUB want-PL-NEG:3ps/E
ißono ho-era ke
ayahuasca drink-AG VL1
'He wants that not even one remains who does not drink ayahuasca.'
b)
kahjune hja-naa ißa-uru-i, kauatga+najßehel, lejhlßehü
cloth wear-NOM know-PL-NEG:3ps/A pretty.nothing not.even.one
'They did not know anything about wearing clothes, not even one of them.'
T h e quantifier arahii (and its variant aral) occurs as a quantifier, but, due to its
ending in the participle suffix, can also function as an adverb. Regarding its
phonological shape, one could speculate that arahii is related to the noun arai
a) Followed by noun:
arahn=te fioanara ti-ahua-ure
several=FOC banana give-DSTR-3pI/E
'They gave lots of bananas [to me].'
b) Followed by verb:
arahu=te ne hanolari ßäe amu-aka=ne
many=FOC be:3ps/E jaguar already walk-lpl/du=CND
'There are many jaguars [around], when we walk.'
Urarina has two quantifiers for 'all', hitaru and satu, which both can function
as nominal heads and as noun modifiers. As head of an NP, satu refers to
humans, while the use of hitaru in this context is restricted to non-human
referents. This distinction appears to be neutralised when these quantifiers
function as noun modifiers (cf. (410)).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Quantifiers 273
The example in (409) shows that satn can be combined with the privative suffix
for 'without', which is normally attached to verbs. This supports the view that
both quantifiers for 'all' are fossilised forms of verbs.
The word hitarn is derived from the transitive verb hitaa 'finish'. It has the
alternative form hita-1, which is the participle form of hitaa, while hitarii
consists of hitaa plus the participle form of the suffix -ri for velocity. The origin
of satn is can be analysed as derived form of intransitive verb saa ' e n d ' , to
which the participle form of the intensifier -toa is attached. This is also
confirmed by the fact that, similar to hitarii/hitai, the quantifier satii has a
variant, sa-1, which again indicates a morphologically complex structure, at
least diachronically.
The semantic difference between hitarii and satii is difficult to determine as
both are used in similar contexts. Both words occur in prenominal position
when used as a modifier. However, there is a slight difference with regard to
their preference: obviously related to the literal meaning of hitarii or hitai,
which is derived from the transitive verb for 'finish', these quantifiers are used
to express that something is taken away, is consumed or finished. In contrast,
satii does not imply this meaning.
The word d^uni listed in (399) will be discussed in §6.4 and §21.1.11. The
following overview summarises the different functions of the quantifiers
discussed in this section. One distinction is that some quantifiers may function
as head of an NP, but others not. A further distinctive property regards their
function and position as modifiers. In addition, most quantifiers have other
specific features that does not apply to others. More details about the position of
each quantifier are found in §6.4.
5.12 Numerals
Urarina numerals represent a mixed class that can be divided into native and
borrowed forms. The native numbers include lexemes from 'one' to 'five',
while the other numerals are loans from Quechua. This includes words for up to
'thousand', while 'million' is a loan from Spanish. The two types of numerals
further differ from each other in that the native numerals are verbs, whereas the
loans are to be analysed as nouns.
Urarina Quechua
1 lejhia (huk)
2 kuruata(ha)a (ishkay)
3 nitpatahaa (kimsa)
4 heena (chusku)
5 saukia (pichqa)
6 sauta soqta
7 kasi, käasi qanchis
8 hoosa, fiooosa pusaq
9 isköo isqon
10 (le=)tg^ka chunka
100 (le=)fiuaafa pachak
1000 (le=)iuarar]ka luaranqa
The word for 'million', arguably a very recent borrowing, is (le=)midyi '(one)
million', is based on Spanish millon.
The term for 'one' can be described as a combination of the root /le/ with the
participle form of the continuous suffix (surfacing as -hü here). The problems
regarding the status of le= being a form "between" clitic and root were
discussed in §2.11. The word for 'two' is related to 'help', kuruatahania.
a) With numeral:
le-fioaaja
one=hundred
'one hundred'
b) With noun:
le=hitQu
one=day
'one day'
a)
nitQataha-a raj komasaj
three-3ps/A POSS wife
'He has three wives.'
b)
kuruataha-a kanu nuta
two-3ps/A lsg eye
Ί have two eyes.'
a)
ni-a=lu lejhi-i katga kauatQa-i
be-3ps/A=REM one-NOM Sbj man good-PRT
'There was one good man'
b)
lejhii eene=te hana nitQataha-j fiuanara siitQa-i laueke
one woman=FOC instead three-NOM Sb j banana hold-PRT be.sitting:3ps/E
'One woman instead is sitting, holding three bananas.'
c)
le=tQurjka-j katga-uru=te kaa ita kuruatahane-ϊ amiane
one=ten-NOM Sb j man=PL=FOC this REC help-PRT work:3ps/E
'Ten people are working [here], helping each other.'
Note that the borrowed words for ' t e n ' , ' h u n d r e d ' , and 'thousand' are treated
like verbs with respect to their occurrence as modifiers, as they take the
nominalising suffix (cf. (415c)). However, they are not attested as full verbs as
the native numerals are. Thus, they are not used in the same way as the
examples in (414).
T h e borrowed numerals 6-9 exhibit a morphological and syntactic structure
that is different from the verbal numerals, since they behave like nouns. In order
to modify another noun the participle form of copular auxiliary nei must be
cliticised to the numeral. This auxiliary can also be used in the continuous form,
as example (416c) illustrates.
a)
käsi=ße~i kuraanaa käsi=ße~t beene
seven=AUX-PRT chief seven=AUX-PRT female
'seven males and seven females'
b)
isköo=ne~i katQa
nine=AUX-PRT man
'nine people'
c)
iskoo=ne-he~i atauari kurete
nine=AUX-CNT-PRT chicken buy:3ps/E
'He bought nine chickens.'
The inflection in noun modifier constructions depends on the final part of the
compound: if the last component is of the native or verbal type, the compound
will follow the verbal morphological pattern; if the final element is between six
and nine, the whole word will be treated like a noun.
N o u n s that refer to a temporal unit such as ' d a y ' , ' w e e k ' , ' m o n t h ' , or ' y e a r ' can
be combined with the root of a verbal numeral. In this case, all inflectional
suffixes (which would normally occur on the verbal numeral) are attached to the
end of the word, as exemplified in (419a), where the numeral root for ' o n e ' is
cliticised to the noun for ' m o n t h ' : in this case the participle marker is suffixed
to the final part ( ' m o n t h ' ) . O n e could say that through the combination of the
noun with a numeral verb a compound is formed which itself b e c o m e s a verb.
This is also shown by the example in (419c), where the verb ' b e four years of
a g e ' is created. 3 5
a)
le=ate-i
one=month-PRT
'one month'
b)
ku neda-i nitQata+haanaka-i heräe ku-ahe-ι ßäe rauta-a
there stay-PRT three+year-PRT slowly go-CNT-PRT already like-3ps/A
'Staying there for three years, he slowly started to like it.'
c)
heena+haanuka-a kanu kalaui
four+year-3ps/A lsg son
'My son is four years old.'
a)
kasi+haanaka=ne-he-~i lana ajjia itQau-e=lu
seven+year=AUX-CNT-PRT husband with live-3ps/E=REM
'She had lived with a husband for seven years.' [NT: Luke 2:36]
35
The word for 'year', ahaana, exhibits a number of peculiarities: in combination with
a numeral, the initial /a/ is elided; there also are the variant haanaka and haanuka. An
alternative approach would be to assume that (a)haana is combined with the
verbalising suffix -(o)ka to form a verb, but this construction is not attested with other
nouns. It is unclear why the example with 'month' should not behave accordingly.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
280 Word classes
b)
sauta+haanuka-m-a
six+year=AUX-3ps/A
'He is six years old.'
The number of times of an action or event is expressed by the suffix -sa, which
is added to the numeral root. Again, this can be followed by the nominaliser -i
or the participle marker -7. The numerals for 'six' and 'seven' (and possibly
others that are not attested here) exhibit a peculiar behaviour as one would
expect the auxiliary form nel to occur after borrowed numerals. However, it is
attested in this form as well as with the nominaliser -i normally found with
verbs only. This could indicate that the distinction between native and borrowed
numerals is on its way to being neutralised.
a) With N O M suffix:
kuruata-sa-j
two-times-NOMsbj
'twice'
Fractions in the arithmetic sense are not a traditional part of Urarina society.
The word katäu 'centre', 'middle' is also used for ' h a l f . In order to measure an
amount or quantity, recently introduced containers such as cups, buckets, etc.
are used. In this case, the suffix -he is attached to the respective noun in order to
express 'a ... o f . As well, the noun is prefixed with the short form for 'one' (no
examples for other quantities are attested). Note that with native words that
refer to a measuring unit, such as ' b u n d l e ' or ' h e r d ' , the suffix -he is not used.
In general, -he does not occur with any function related to quantity elsewhere in
the grammar.
a) 'Cup':
le=tasa-he asejte
one=cup-NQF oil
'a cup of oil'
b) 'Plate':
le-plato-hiue ate
one=plate-NQF fish
'a plate of fish'
c) 'Bundle':
le=itQu ra-ι enua
one=bundle receive-PRT wood
'taking a bundle of wood'
d) 'Group':
le=lauri raana
one=group w.l.peccary
'a herd of white-lipped peccaries'
For other kinds of measuring, such as dimension or time, loans from Spanish
(metoro, minuto, oral) are used in combination with the Urarina words for
'length', ' w i d t h ' etc.
a)
le=tQuyka metoro ni-a raj kaare
one=ten meter be-3ps/A POSS length
'Its length was 100m.'
b)
harautono=te kuruata+tQugka metoro ne
width=FOC two+ten meter be:3ps/E
'Its width is 20m.'
c)
hajti kuruata+tQuyka minuto ne-laanala turu hana
still two+ten minute be-PRV arrive when
'20 minutes are missing till he comes.'
It should also be mentioned that the word for 'one' may be used as a kind of
delimitative for 'being the only (thing)', as the following examples illustrate.
Typically, it co-occurs with the suffix -at$a 'only', which is attached to the
delimited noun.
a)
lejhii hitQana-atQa kuane=te nesaritQaete-kure katga-uru
one blowgun-only inside=FOC hunt-3pl/E man-PL
'People hunted with a blowgun only.'
b)
lejhti buruari-itga=te kurete-kure=lu nuse kahe
one poison-only=FOC buy-3pl/E=REM town from
'They only bought the poison in town.'
Urarina has no ordinal numbers. Also note that Jebero, which is one of the
languages in the area, has numerals from 1-5, while six and the following are
borrowed from Quechua as well (cf. Tessmann 1930). Tessmann also says that
Urarina has a word for 'six' - [dautani] - which is not attested in my database,
nor is it known to any of my consultants. Instead, it is likely to refer to
sauta nei, which is the borrowed numeral for 'six' followed by the participle
form of the auxiliary. The geographically proximate language Omurana (cf.
§1.3) has numerals from one to ten, which are neither related to Urarina
numerals, nor to Quechua.
There is no word for 'number', as there was no need for it before the
introduction of schools. The teachers nowadays use the Spanish word 'numero'.
The verb haniitQa 'select' is also used for 'count'.
5.13 Interjections
(425) Interjections
ah (surprise)
ah-he (fatigue)
ahse (disgust)
auh-heha (surprise+desire)
eehe 'yes'
ha, he, hn (mark begin o f speech)
zva (suddenly happening; disapproval)
5.14 Ideophones
haahaha (laughter)
hau-hau-hau (dog barking)
hii-hii-hii-hii (threatening cry)
hjau (happening easily and quickly)
hwa (falling d o w n )
kuru-kuru-kuru-kuru (bird croaking)
ßaaau (desire and lust)
raae (slowly falling d o w n )
7
raj (falling down to break)
rouu-rajhi (tree falling d o w n )
sehte (sth. falling into water)
tohwoj (sth. falling into water)
tQunenenenee (sizzling)
tiitQarararara (sliding d o w n )
tVi (falling d o w n after sliding)
toho-tohö-tohö-tohö (applying magic)
unee-unee-unee-unee (child crying)
The class of ideophones must be regarded an open class since new noises may
be added with each new situation or noise to be described. There also is
considerable variation among speakers with respect to the imitation of noises,
which can result into the production of sounds not otherwise represented in the
phonological inventory (some examples are given in §22.1). Also the number of
times of reduplication is subject to variation.
5.15 Particles
The number of particles that cannot be assigned to any of the word classes
discussed above is relatively small. Nevertheless, their function and meaning
are difficult to define. It seems that all of them imply emphasis of some kind.
These particles are observed in conversations or in direct speech; in narratives
they may be part of quotations of the stories' protagonists. While not much
information about the "emphatic" particles tQU, hjä, and läe is available, their
phonological structure and the fact that they can be attached to words of
different classes might suggest that they are enclitics. However, since speakers
tend to identify all particles as separate words, they clearly differ from clitics,
which were discussed in §2.11. The fact that all particles can be followed by the
enclitic final emphatic =ra does not provide evidence with regard to their status,
as =ra clause enclitic that could attach to any word class in clause-final
position. Thus, there is not enough evidence as to add any particles to the list of
clitics.
The particle tgu typically occurs in combination with other elements, such as
the clause coordinator t$ae, or after a focus marker, such as in aka=te t$u 'he
(certainly)' (cf. (428a)). It puts emphasis on the element it follows, which
makes it likely to be a focus marker, possibly to be translated as 'certainly'.
However, its function is different from the set of focus markers =ne, =na, and
=te, which also function as cross-reference markers (cf. §19). In (427a), tQU
follows the clause coordinator tpäe, which itself is marked with a clitic for
focus; the particle emphasises the fact that magnetic ground will be there in
addition to the other things already mentioned in the context. Similarly, the
occurrence of the particle in (427b), this time without =te, "spices" the utterance
with additional emphasis.
a)
tQäe=te tQU ne-re=~i atane maamale-j
also=FOC CRTN be-IRR:3ps/E=ASS land stick-NOM Sbj
'Besides, there will be magnetic ground.'
b)
tQäe tQU hoa eno-a eruari kuane raj kofiua
also CRTN don't enter-NTR mosquito.net inside POSS compadre
'Also, his compadre ought not enter into the mosquito net!'
a) After pronoun:
aka=te tQU ni-a tenjente+gobernador=ne kujßa projekto
3sg=FOC CRTN be-3ps/D governor=SUB so.that project
itQa-e=lu
do-3ps/E=REM
'[It was] also he [who] developed a project that there be a governor.'
b) After adverb:
esijiae=te tQU aj
really=FOC CRTN AUX:3ps/E
'He really did it.'
c) After verb:
nahari h-i IQU nifo, tako
liver eat-2ps CRTN ADVRS PSN
'Tako, have you [really] eaten liver [which you should not have done]?'
Further examples illustrate that tg,u itself can be followed by an emphatic clitic,
=ra.
a)
ßäe tQU=ra ne-tabatakaae-kuru-a kanaanaj-uru=ra
already CRTN=EMF ITR-reduce-PL-3ps/A child-PL=EMF
'Already my sons are reduced [in number].'
b)
he, nii-tQa here-j tQu=ra ka=kiueraj
hey that-only want-NOMobj CRTN=EMF lsg=visitor
'Well, this is what my visitor wanted.'
a) Self-encouragement:
d^aha-1 hjä ajane
come.on-PRT just yes
'Come on, yes' [he said and stole a piece of shell]
c)
turu-ni~u=he=te hjä ii kzvara-kuru-mn=tQa
arrive-DSTL-IMP=REP=FOC just 2sg see-PL-JUSS=EMF
'Just go and arrive there so that they might see you.' [Meant as encouragement towards
priest who is afraid that he would be killed by the natives]
In the following two examples hjä occurs with declarative forms, but could still
be translated as 'just', having a possibly "softening" function.
a)
ii kauatg,a=nuke=na hjä nekäune itQa-ü=ra
2sg good=PURP=FOC: 1 sg just more do-lsg/E=EMF
36
Ί did it more for your sake [than mine].'
36
The exact function and meaning of nekäune are unclear.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
Particles 287
b)
ki-i=ße kujßa=na hjä te-ü=ra
eat-2ps=SUB so.that=FOC: lsg just give-lsg/E=EMF
Ί gave it to you to eat.' [Seeing that he doesn't eat it]
a)
ajto-a tQU hjä
say-3ps/A CRTN just
'Yes, he did say so.'
b)
eehe, aj-a tgu hjä kotaeto-a
yes AUX-3ps/A CRTN just be.tiring-3ps/A
'Yes, indeed it is very tiring.' [Why don't you replace us]
c)
aj-i=ta, ßäe t$u hjä=ra hitaru
AUX-NEG:3ps/A=FRS already CRTN just=EMF all
kajpa-kaanu=ra kurura
give.back-lpl/ex=EMF Milord
'It is not so, we [do] have returned everything, Milord.' [Contradicting an accusation]
ahe
drunkenness
'Already becoming sober there, their drunkenness already passed.' [whereas they did
not feel anything before]
b) After ßäe=ra:
ßäe=ra läe bati-a
already=EMF CHNG dry-3ps/A
'It has dried already.' [after it was flooded for a long time]
d) After postposition:
he, ka=raj läe hitarü nii kari kajßa-ku-t$e=rä
hey 1 sg=for CHNG all that shell give.back-IMP-PL=EMF
'Now give me all the shells back!' [after you kept refusing to do so]
The examples in (434) illustrate that läe is also used in order to mark a change
of situation that is not time-related. In both examples, it appears to have focus
function, which is consistent with the contrastive function suggested with
temporals above. The sentence in (434a) implies that 'someone else will do it or
has done it'. Example (434b) refers to a monkey that lives on one particular
tree, as opposed to another species of monkey, which moves from tree to tree -
which was the topic of the sentence preceding it. One can conclude from this
that läe is a discourse particle for a change of situation.
a)
kanu läe itQa-ri-a-ü=m
lsg CHNG do-IRR-NEG-lsg/E=ASS
Ί will certainly not do it.'
b)
aka=te läe helaja-tga ne-lauria-Ί it$au-e=ra
3sg=FOC CHNG same.place-only ITR-sit-PRT live-3ps/E=EMF
'He lives sitting in a single place.'
a) tQu:
aka=te tgu itga-e
3sg=FOC CRTN do-3ps/E
'Certainly he did it.'
b) hjä:
aka=te hjä itga-e
3sg=FOC just do-3ps/E
'He simply did it.' [e.g. A in an argument between A and B, where Β claims that C did
not do it]
c) läe:
aka=te läe itQa-e
3sg=FOC CHNG do-3ps/E
'Yes, he did it indeed.' [whereas before he was still trying]
The particle noane (also functioning as the root of the verb 'lie' - which is
usually mentioned by Urarina speakers when asked about the particle), marks
self-pity, compassion and can be translated as 'unfortunately'. The emphasis,
however, is not to show compassion for another person, but to express one's
own pitiful situation. For instance, when this word is used in a statement such as
'unfortunately I don't have any more rice', it primarily refers to the speaker's
own miserable situation rather than the intention to comfort the person who
asked for rice. The database contains only a few examples, some of which are
given in (438). In (438c), where noam is used with the imperative, it has a self-
humiliating connotation.
a)
netitgara, noane kuhoarue-hee-ka katga=ne
maybe PTY remain-DIM-3ps/D man=CND
'Poor me, maybe if someone has remained [of all those who have died]...'
b)
nalu-a-atga-anu noane
fall-only-lsg/A PTY
'Poor me, I fell down.'
c)
atii noane ka=raj arusu te-uri-u
please PTY lsg=for rice give-RAP-IMP
'Please give a little rice to me poor guy!'
There are a f e w further particles, which are discussed elsewhere. These include
the reciprocal marker ita (cf. §16.3) and the hearsay marker hetau (cf. §22.5).
In the previous sections, I described the various word classes and their specific
properties. It has become evident that verbs are inherently different from nouns
in a number of features: they take arguments, they are inflected for person,
number, polarity, and a number of further grammatical categories. They also
have a citation form that ends with the neutral form (which is identical to the
citation form and the form for 3ps/A), i.e. every verb in citation form ends with
an /a/ (or allomorphs). Nouns, in contrast, do not take arguments, and their
citation form is the singular, which can end in any vowel of the sound system. A
link between nouns and verbs can typically be achieved by derivation, which,
for instance, derives a noun from a verbal root, or vice versa. This process
usually requires morphological elements, typically realised as suffixes in
Urarina.
O n e example for derivation is the verbalisation from a noun root through
-oka, as described in §7.3.1. Even though it may seem awkward to create a verb
for 'sister' or ' a x e ' , this is a regular type of derivation in the language. A more
complicated situation is described below. In some examples (although these are
only a few), words that are doubtlessly non-abstract nouns receive a suffix that
is otherwise not used as a category-changing morpheme, but a suffix used with
verbs, the participle suffix -i or its equivalents for the continuous form. In
example (439a), the noun for ' b a c k ' (body part) is inflected; in (439b), the form
is suffixed to kliri, which is a type of tree (also referring to its fruit). The use of
the participle with this noun is understood as 'apply (the j u i c e of) this fruit to
someone'.
a)
niki ajßa u-a=ne sajhjei ke hanori-l amu-a
but with come-3ps/D=SUB although VLI back-PRT walk-3ps/A
'But even though he had come with him, he walked (away), turning his back on him.'
b)
ßäe nii kuri ke kuri-hja-1 ku mita-e
already DEM jagua.tree VLI 7'agwa-CNT-PRT there take.out-3ps/E
'Applying that jagua fruit [to the baby], he took [the baby] out.'
While this does not seem to be a productive pattern, it occurs in isolated cases.
There are several ways to account for this:
1. If we assume that the participle suffix (and its continuous counterpart) is
actually a derivational morpheme rather than inflection, the problem is
resolved. The dilemma is that it can be attached to any verb without further
conditions - which would be atypical for derivation. Another problem is that
a participle form is not typically word-class changing, as it is functionally
associated with verbs. A further problem is that the distinction between
inflection and derivation in Urarina is of a rather scalar kind and it is not
useful to strictly separate the two terms (also cf. § 10).
2. Perhaps a more natural way to account for the "verbalisation" of nouns is to
regard the conversion of a noun into a verb as zero derivation, such as
frequently happens in other languages. Similar to the example in (439)
above, English also derives a verb from the noun for 'back'. The resulting
verb can even be inflected for past as in 'back-ed'.
Since both solutions are suitable to describe the process observed here, I would
not like to determine which one is superior. However, given that the
phenomenon is only observed with some isolated cases, the second solution
may appear more likely.
Partly related to the issue of zero derivation is the following example:
kaa+rtii (also simplified to ka+rni) is a compound formed from two different
demonstratives: 'this' and 'that' (cf. (440)), which together mean '(a) sort o f ,
'something like this', 'something like that' and can function as a nominal head
or as a modifier. It is also used as a "filler" (as in pause), but most interestingly,
it functions as a verb, in which case the suffixes for person and number are
attached.
a) Modifier:
lae hvajtei kanii banajt^u ne-1 hetau d^uhuturu-a ku-e
CHNG again sort.of type.of.heron be-PRT Η RS sit.down-NTR go-3ps/E
'[Then] again, becoming a sort of banajtQu heron, he went to sit down [on a branch].'
b) Head of NP:
ku ari-uru-a hau hetau ku ni-a kanii ni-a
there seek-PL-3ps/D because HRS there be-3ps/A sort.of be-3ps/A
c) Verb:
ku najßal, lenone-ϊ, kaanii-tQuru-a hau,... ßäe nuku-hiue
there nicely eat-PRT sort.of-PL-3ps/D because already get.dark-CNT:3ps/E
'As they were eating nicely, doing this sort of thing,... it already became dark.'
While s o m e suffixes that typically occur with verbs are also found on word
classes other than that, there are noun suffixes that occur on word classes other
than nouns. M o r e specifically, the noun plural -uru (or allomorphs) is suffixed
a) With kahe:
ka=iritgu hatgu-uru kuane kahe-uru itanitQa karuru-1
lsg=ear hole-PL inside from-PL mud clean-PRT
'... cleaning the mud from the inside of my ear holes ...'
b) With kuanaj:
kuanaj-uru nianatn hja-ur-e
inside-PL even urinate-PL-3ps/E
'They even urinated in them [the clothes].'
a) With kahe:
ßäe kahjune kaja-hakioa-uru-a katga-uru kahe
already clothes seize-DSTR-PL-3ps/A man-PL from
'They took the clothes away from the people'
b) With kuane·.
kulümi itulere nukue-kuru kuane ... akauru raj ate=ra
let.there.be all.kinds river-PL inside 3pl for fish=EMF
'Let there be fish for them ... in all kinds of rivers.'
Similarly, the form of the verb illustrated in (444) lacks an explanation. In this
case, (which is an isolated example) the participle form of 'say' is followed by
the plural in order to indicate that the content of the sentence was
communicated to several people.
Less surprisingly, the plural -uru is observed with the quantifier itulere (which
was shown to be a noun, cf. (400), with demonstratives (which can function as a
nominal head, cf. §5.11.1), and with numerals (in nominalised form). In (445c),
plural is marked on the nominalisation of the numeral verb for 'two'. Note that
in this case, the plural suffix precedes the nominaliser -i, as a regular feature of
inflection (cf. §6.6.1).
a) Demonstrative:
i=tQuerehe-uru i-tguasej nii-tguru ajßa ini-u-ra
2sg=child-PL 2sg-wife that-PL with go.up-IMP-EMF
' G o and climb with your w i f e and your children, with those.'
b) Quantifier:
atane huu-ka akau=ne hana, itulere-uru nerutii-hahoa-e
land f l o o d - 3 p s / D water=SUB when all.kinds-PL change-DSTR-3ps/E
'When the water flooded the earth, all kinds o f things changed.'
c) Numeral:
ku huajtei nii kuruataha-ur-i
there again that two-PL-NOM S bj
'(There) again, those t w o [men] [said] ...' [Lit. 'those w h o were t w o ' ]
One can conclude that the morphology of Urarina is flexible to a certain degree
in that it is not strictly bound to specific word classes. Furthermore, it becomes
evident that there hardly are any morphological structures other than the one
also found on verbs. From this it can be concluded that Urarina is a highly verb-
prominent language.
5.17 Summary
The analysis of different word classes in Urarina has shown that this system is
unusual in various respects. Urarina exhibits a strong predominance of verbs
and nouns, as most other word classes are either verb-like or noun-like, if not
subclasses of nouns and verbs. Adjectives are one example of this, as they do
not represent a separate underived class, but occur on a scale between nouns
and verbs, with a variety of features that are normally assigned to verbs and
nouns. Adverbs are special in that only a small number are underived (temporal
adverbs), whereas most other words of this class are derived from verbs.
Pronouns and demonstratives can be analysed as subtypes of nouns;
postpositions are noun-like in that they can take a plural marker, and quantifiers
do not represent a homogeneous word class as most members are derived verbs.
Furthermore, numerals have been analysed as special types of nouns and verbs,
respectively. What remains are small classes of highly functional categories
such as conjunctions, interjections, and introducers (which may represent a
typologically rare word class). The verb-prone character of Urarina is further
confirmed by the fact that the morphology is vastly based on suffixes that also
occur on verbs. The following table illustrates the statistical distribution of
different word classes based on 3,365 lexical entries.
37
However, recall that some clitics operate on the clause level and can be attached to
any word level irrespective of its class assignment (cf. §2.11).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:32 PM
6 Noun Phrase structure
The order of elements within the Urarina Noun Phrase (NP) is variable to a
certain degree. Speaking in a simplified manner, all kinds of modifiers can
occur in prenominal position, with some peculiarities, which are discussed in
this chapter. In principle, a division into two groups can be made: modifiers that
can also follow the noun and those that cannot, or, expressed in a different way:
modifiers with a fixed position within the N P and modifiers that exhibit a
certain degree of variation regarding their position. The "restricted" group of
words, which obligatorily occur in prenominal position, consists of
demonstratives, possessives, and numerals. 38 Adjectives, nominalised verbs,
quantifiers, and special modifying nouns can occur before or after the noun, the
details of which will be investigated in §6.1 to §6.5. In §6.6,1 will also discuss
the position and structure of relative constructions, which are realised as
nominalisations and are therefore part of the NP.
While the high degree of order variation makes it almost impossible to state
the "unmarked" order of modifiers within the NP, it can be said that most
typically, all modifiers except adjectives precede the head noun, with
demonstratives and quantifiers preferably occurring before other modifiers. The
variable order of constituents within the NP is only partly predictable, such as
with some adjectival modifiers (cf. §6.5); otherwise, it is unclear whether order
variation has any semantic or pragmatic effects. It must be noted that
syntactically complex NPs (involving two or more modifiers) do not very
commonly occur in the database. Since the N T translation contains a much
wider range of examples for complex NPs, many of the cases illustrated in this
chapter are adopted from there. However, the lack of natural examples results
into a number of questions that cannot be answered, i.e. it is impossible to
predict all possible and impossible combinations for each and all nominal
modifier. Another issue is the ambiguity of some examples with regard to the
scope of some modifiers. As a general tendency, the rightmost modifier has
scope over the head of N P and any further modifiers that precede it have scope
over that constituent (right-branched bracketing). However, in some cases,
which all involve quantifiers, the scope of the quantifier can differ from that.
With some lengthy examples from the NT, the scope may be ambiguous. The
following sections discuss the details of the common occurrence of different
38
Numerals may be regarded a subtype of quantifiers, but since they exhibit a different
syntactic behaviour than other quantifiers, they are discussed separately. Also see the
structural differences between quantifiers and numerals as discussed in §5.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Demonstratives 299
6.1 Demonstratives
Demonstratives usually take the first position in the Ν Ρ and are not normally
preceded by any other modifier, with the exception o f some quantifiers (cf.
§ 6 . 4 ) . T h e y also occur before possessives (i.e. before the possessor, which in
turn precedes the possessum). T h e following list shows those combinations
from the database in which demonstratives are attested. T h i s summary is
illustrated by the examples in ( 4 4 8 ) .
6.2 Numerals
Numerals have a comparatively fixed position within the N P in that they follow
demonstratives and precede nouns. However, the order between possessives and
numerals may vary, as will be shown by the examples in (452).
a) [NUM + N]:
le=tQurjka-j katQa
[one=ten-NOMSbj man]
'ten men'
b) [NUM + [N + A]]:
lejhii katQa baaso
[one [man bad]]
'one bad man'
c) [[NUM + N] + QNF]:
le=lauri katga arahii
[[one=group man] several]
O n e group of many people [became water people].' [I.e. a large group of people]
When a possessive construction forms part of the NP, the preferred order is with
the numeral in initial position, followed by the possessive (cf. (452a)). There is
only one counterexample where the numeral occurs between possessum and
possessor, which is displayed in (452b).
Since the example in (452b) is elicited and represents a rare case, one can
conclude that the preferred position of numerals is before possessives, and
obligatorily before the head noun, but after demonstratives.
6.3 Possessives
In the previous section, it was already mentioned that the order between
numerals and the possessor within an N P is variable. The position of possessors
is otherwise fixed in that they never follow the head noun and never precede
demonstratives. Certain quantifiers, (exemplified by satü 'all' in (454d)) can
occur before a possessive.
a) [POSSR+ N]:
kanu ßaka
[lsg father]
'my father'
6.4 Quantifiers
a) itulere:
nitgae hetau=te ne=lu itulere bakaua
over.there HRS=FOC be:3ps/E=REM all.kinds Indio
'Over there were all kinds of [dangerous] indios.'
b) d^uni:
rüjej d^unej katQa beraj-ßaa najß-ene
not.at.all nobody man care.for-INF be.able-NEG:3ps/E
'Absolutely nobody can take care of him.'
a) arahü:
arahü alau ru-anu-m hau
many spider.monkey find-lsg/D=SUB because
'as I had found [a group of] many spider monkeys ... [I shot them].'
b) hitanT.
hitarü akauru raj d^alu-a hau
all 3pl for distribute-3ps/D because
'as he distributed [the clothes] to all of them'
c) satii:
satü kat$a-uru=te ku-re=i
all man-PL=FOC go-IRR:3ps/E=ASS
'All the people will go [to the election].'
d) laurilauri:
tgäe i-hiniitQal lauri+lauri ne-nakauru eno-a-u
also 2sg=together RED+group be-those.who enter-CAUl-IMP
'Also let enter with you all species of those that exist.'
In contrast to the examples in (461), there also are instances where the
quantifiers laurilauri, arahu, and hitarü are found after the noun. Note that this
is not attested for satii.
a) arahii: [N + QNF]:
hi ne-rehete-kure katQa-uru arahii
there be-HABl-3pl/E [man-PL several]
'Many people used to live there.'
ni-akioa-a ku-e=lu
be-DSTR-NTR go-3ps/E=REM
'Therefore, all those branches turned into all the rivers that there are.'
(also cf. §5.11.3). However, while this position is the more common one,
tabauru can also occur before the head, where it functions as a modifier (cf.
(464b)).
b) Prenominal (elicited):
tabauru urarißa-uru ßäe ere-uru-i n=ere he
some Urarina-PL already speak-PL-NEG:3ps/A 3ps=word VLI
'Some Urarina (people) already do not speak their language.'
T h e above table shows that there are three m a j o r groups of adjectival modifiers
- those that those that function as noun modifiers only (cf. §6.5.1), those that
can also function as head of N P (cf. §6.5.2), and deverbal adjectives, as
discussed in §6.5.3. Their position within the N P is highly heterogeneous.
Subsequently, the combinations of adjectives with other elements within the N P
can be expected to vary with respect to the adjective that is involved, which is
in fact the case. For other differences between the different types of adjectives,
see §5.4.4.
T h e w o r d s laauhwiri and seohwa are the only ones that do not function as a
nominal head, but exclusively occur with m o d i f y i n g function. Their position in
the N P is restricted to occurrence directly after the noun.
a) laauhiviri:
kanaanaj laauhzuiri
child small
'little child'
b)seohioa:
bute seeohwa itQa-e
boat big make-3ps/E
'He made a big boat.'
The addition of a prenominal modifier does not have any impact on the position of
these adjectives. The examples in (467a,b), illustrate the occurrence of these words
in combination with numerals and demonstratives. In the same way, they occur in
this position when the head noun is preceded by a possessor (cf. (467c)).
In summary, laauhzoiri and seohioa are most restricted in their function and
position, as they always modify a noun (but do not function as a head) and
consistently occur in postnominal position.
The group of adjectival nouns that can also function as a nominal head is much
more diverse than the group mentioned above. Adjectival nouns differ from
other nouns in that they typically occur as modifiers of a nominal head. They
are also different from other modifying nouns, which mainly comprise proper
and "status" nouns (cf. §6.5.4). While the majority of adjectival nouns resemble
adjectives in that they occur as modifiers directly after the noun, there are some
whose position can vary, netgäasaj 'wicked', nat$a$i]ie 'new', and enamanaa
a) biißa:
lureri biißa
house old
'old house'
b) baaso:
hanonaa baaso bana
day bad when
'on a bad day' [e.g. a rainy day]
In contrast to other adjectival nouns, the word leot$a 'other' occurs only in
prenominal position. Reversing the order such as illustrated in (471c) changes
the meaning to a possessive reading, literally meaning 'the ones different from
the Urarina'. Also note that leotg,a always occurs adjacent to the head noun.
39
In Romance languages, an adjective following the noun refers to a property in
differentiation to another, possibly contrary property ('nice, not bad'), whereas the
adjective in prenominal position implies that the quality expressed by it is naturally
associated with the noun ("generic" property).
a) Before noun:
leotQa rukuele=te laati-tgaatge
other things=FOC need-lpl/in
'We need other things.'
b) With quantifier:
arahti leot$a-uru katQa-uru
many other-PL man-PL
'many other people'
c) Possessive:
urarifla-uru leotQa-uru
Urarina-PL other-PL
'other people than Urarina'
Adjectival modifiers that are derived from verbs by the nominalising suffix -i
do not behave in a uniform way. Words of this type preferably occur in
postnominal position, as displayed in (472). However, some cases are also
attested before the head noun: Examples with kauati 'good' and tasipohwaj
'big' are given in (473). Different from other deverbal adjectives, aafihii
'small' is only observed in prenominal position (cf. (474)).
a) hitQuhivaj:
hjanarihi hitQuhzua-j
sugar.cane be.black-NOM S bj
'black sugar cane' [Lit. 'sugar cane that is black']
b) tasißohivaj:
lureri tasißohiua-j hoara-kau
house be.big-NOM s b j see-Ips/A
Ί have seen a big house.' [Lit. 'house that is big']
c) tabaj:
ku ne-rehete fiuasto taba-j
there be-HABl :3ps/E field be.big-NOM Sbj
'There used to be a big field.' [Lit. 'field that is big']
The postnominal position of the modifiers presented above is also attested with
other verbs that are nominalised with -i. However, this does not correspond to
their prototypical position. As shown in §6.6.1, other intransitive verbs with the
nominaliser -i preferably occur before the head. This allows the conclusion that
deverbal adjectives have a slightly different syntactic behaviour than other
nominalisations with -i.
There are some attested examples for deverbal adjectives that occur in
variable position. In the same way as the adjectival noun kauatQa (cf. (470)),
the deverbal adjectives kauati, tasißohzoaj, and tabaj entail a slightly different
meaning when appearing before the head noun. The interpretation implied by
this order refers to a more generic, almost compound-like nature of the NP.
a) kauati:
ni-a kauat-i teefivolo=ne
be-3s be.good-NOMsbj church.building=CND
'if there is a nice church building' [implying: not "nice" as opposed to "ugly", but one
of the nice sort, such as the people in the other village have]
b) tasißohwaj:
tasißohwa-j läatga
be.big-NOM sb j ship
'big ship' [implying "not just any boat as opposed to others, but the big type that goes
on the Maraflon River"]
At this stage, it must be assumed that the pre-head position of äafihii is the only
possible one, as no other examples are attested. Also note that an adjective can
be preceded by the intensifier hatal In example (475), this combination results
into the structure Noun + Intensifier + Adjective.
As mentioned in §5.1.3, there are some nouns that can modify another noun.
Differences between these modifying nouns are observed with respect to their
position within the NP. Some nouns occur before the head, whereas others
follow the head. Modifying nouns can be proper nouns or can be related to
status or profession. As "status" is a difficult to define term, the cover term
"social position" is used in (476), which also includes "profession". 40 Another
important factor to be mentioned is that constructions that involve nouns, which
modify another noun are not frequent. As many examples are taken from the
NT, some of these could be caiques, which would also explain the variability in
position.
40
The term "status" may be more justified as a characterisation of the modifying noun
in rtii raj bitoasipe aräala 'his booty, the tapir', where 'tapir' (araala) is specified by
'his booty'. However, such examples are extremely rare (cf. ex. (1) in §20.3.5).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
316 Noun Phrase structure
addition, both examples given in (477) are ambiguous and could be interpreted
as possessive constructions such as ' G o d ' s envoys' w o m a n ' and 'the chiefs of
all priests', respectively.
a)
kana+hoaaun-era letono eene
Our.creator envoy woman
'a woman who is an envoy of God' (elicited)
b)
satti saseredote-kuru htraanaa-kuru
all priest-PL chief-PL
'all chief priests' [NT: Matthew 2:4]
eene misjonera
woman missionary
'a woman who is a missionary' (elicited)
A s mentioned, the combination of person or place names with full nouns is not
very c o m m o n in Urarina, which could mean that the examples from the N T
discussed below are caiques. However, they will be mentioned for the sake of
completeness, as this will illustrate which combinations are possible (even
though they might not be typical). The example (479a) is from a narrative and
therefore "natural". Also note that the second noun is prefixed with b-, which
occurs in this kind of construction, but only if the head noun begins with a
vowel (cf. §7.3.2). The other two examples are more difficult to interpret: again,
it is unclear which of the nouns is the head of the phrase, since person names
can occur with head function without an accompanying noun. Since Urarina
speakers find it absurd to see a difference between something that can be
translated as "King Herod" or alternatively "Herod the king", there is little
evidence for either analysis.
N o u n s that refer to tribal affiliation are not much easier to analyse with regard
to their function as noun modifiers. The reason for this is that they typically
occur as nominal heads themselves. For instance, rather than the (elicited)
example in (480a), the variant without katQa ' m a n ' would be more natural.
Here, ' m a n ' is understood as the head noun modified by 'Indio' (indicating
what type of man is referred to). 41 The second example 'Urarina settlement'
could also be interpreted as a possessive construction: "town of Urarinas".
The N T offers a variety of further examples that involve place names. However,
it appears that the position of these is not strictly fixed. In some examples, the
41
The word bakaua is used as a general term for all native indian groups other than the
Urarina, usually with a negative connotation.
place name precedes the head noun, but it occurs in postnominal position in
other phrases.
a)
kann katQa-uru urarißa-uru
1 sg man-PL Urarina-PL
'my people the Urarina'
b)
kana hoaaun-era israel kiuaaun-era
lpl/in create-AG PLN create-AG
'God, the creator of Israel' [Lit. our creator, the creator of Israel') [NT: Matthew 15:31]
Sequences of modifiers are not really common; all attested examples are from
the NT; comparable structures are confirmed for elicited examples not listed
here. Also note that the bracketing for these examples is tentative. The
examples in (484) involve numerals and adjectives and illustrate that more than
one adjectival modifier can occur within one NP. In two of the sentences, the
adjectival noun netQäasaj 'wicked' occurs before the word baaso 'bad (thing)',
which is can function as a modifier, but is a nominal head here. In the other
example, netQäasaj precedes the nominal head, which is further modified by
postnominal tabaj.
c) [NUM + [A + [N + REL]]]:
lejhii netQäasaj tajbipaae taba-j
[one [wicked [animal be.big-NOM Sbj ]]]
'one big wicked animal' [NT: Revelation 11:7]
6.6 Relativisation
The suffix -/, (which merges with a preceding vowel; cf. §3.4), occurs in
relativising function with transitive and intransitive verbs. With intransitive
verbs, the resulting noun refers to a subject, as is illustrated in (486).
a)
ku nii ajrinia lauhu-i rausi
there [that outside sit-NOM Sbj ] bite:3ps/E
'It bit the one that was sitting outside.'
b)
lomaj=te hanunaa siiri-i-tQa ne=ra
PSN=FOC [night have-NOM Sbj -only] be-3ps/E=EMF
'Lomai is the one who has got the night.'
a)
kanu-atQa baha-j ti-ji
[lsg-only ask-NOM 0 bj] give-NEG:3ps/A
' H e did not give me what I asked for.'
b)
kiitQa kiuaauna-ur-i itahe-ri-tQäu=ni
[lsg:only create-PL-NOM o b j ] destroy-IRR-lsg/A=ASS
Ί will destroy those which I have created.'
A lexicalised example that contains the agentive suffix -era is the word for
' G o d ' , which is composed of the lpl/in pronoun kana followed by the agentive
form of the verb for 'create': kana kiu a ami-era literally means 'the one who
created us'. The suffix -era is productively used to refer to an A argument, as
some more examples illustrate. Note that in the examples in (488a), the plural
-uru precedes the suffix -era. A nominal ised verb involving -era can function
as a nominal head or precede the head of an NP.
a)
hajti=te ne ißono ku-ur-era
still=FOC be:3ps/E ayahuasca drink-PL-AG
'There are still those who drink ayahuasca.'
b)
lenone te-ra ari-a niki amuemu-he
food give-AG seek-NTR A D V R S wander-CNT:3ps/E
' H e walked around (in vain) to seek the one who had provided the food.'
There is a tendency for some verbs to occur with reverse order between plural
and the suffix -era with no apparent difference in meaning (cf. (489)). Instead of
-ur-era, the order of the two suffixes is reversed to -era-uru. There are only a
few attested examples that exhibit this variation, but it may be assumed that it is
possible with other verbs as well. Also note that certain morpho-phonological
alternations take place with the examples in (489), even though with some
deviations: in knhjutaa 'bless' (also 'curse'), the root-final /a/ is elided before
the attachment of -era, while this does not apply to letoaa 'send', where the
There are no records about the systematic shift from one form to the other. Also
recall that the form with the preceding plural suffix is the typical position
occurring in the nominalisation with -i (cf. (487b)). This position of the plural
suffix corresponds to the non-final position of plural markers on verbs (cf.
§12.2.12). Since nouns do not take any other inflection than plural, the "final"
position of the plural on nouns is inconclusive. However, the fact that plural can
also be expressed after the agentive -era could have evolved under influence
from Spanish.
The nominalising suffix -naa is.used with two different functions. Firstly, it
occurs as a nominaliser that forms noun describing an action or the result of an
action from a transitive or intransitive verb, such as illustrated in (490). The
derived noun can occur in any argument slot.
Note that the nominalising suffix -naa is irregular with the verb root /ajto/
'say': as shown in (490a), the form is realised as ajtöohwä. This form is
exceptional and does not occur with any other verb.
In some cases, the reading as an action noun does not apply, but the
nominalised verb functions as a relative clause (in (491a) as head noun; in
modifying function in (491b)). It is unclear whether the forms are polysemous
for action/result or agentive reading. All attested examples for this form involve
intransitive verbs or the copula nia. However, it is unclear which intransitive
verbs receive abstract meaning and which ones are used in a relative clause.
b) As noun modifier:
lejhii eene kunajte-naa=te u-e
one woman be.sick-NOM^FOC die-3ps/E
Ά certain woman who was sick has died.'
b) With copula:
tQäe i=hiniitQal lauri+lauri ne-nakauru enoa-u
also 2sg=together RED+group be-those.who make.enter-IMP
'Also make those who are of different types enter!'
The fact that -nakauru only occurs with intransitive verbs suggests that -naa in
its function as a relativiser also is restricted to intransitive verbs. However, it
remains unclear why the intransitive examples in (490a) receive abstract
meaning.
c) With -naa:
nauta kahe u-naa kat$a=te turu-e ikito-o
PLN from come-NOM man=FOC arrive-3ps/E PLN-LOC
'The man who came from Nauta has arrived in Iquitos.'
d) With -era:
katga ki-ur-era bakaua-kuru
man eat-PL-AG Indio-PL
'the indios who ate people'
e) With -nakauru:
saata marta kahe turu-nakauru katga-uru=te asejte baha-e
PLN from arrive-those.who man-PL=FOC oil ask-3ps/E
'The people who came from Santa Marta asked for oil.'
b) With -naa:
mi ranuna nitahe-naa kuraa=te marja ne
that girl get.lost-NOM name=FOC PSN be:3ps/E
'The name of the girl who got lost is Maria.'
c) With -era:
lejhn katQa barue ku-era ne-ι ne-naa
one man masato drink-AG be-PRT be-NOM
'one man who drinks ayahuasca'
d) With -nakauru:
letguijka-j kat$a-uru lomaj atane he amu-nakauru
ten-NOMsbj man-PL PSN land VLI walk-those.who
'the ten men who went to the land of Lomai'
The following table summarises the order of the different types of relative
clauses with respect to the head of an Ν P. It becomes evident that the position
of the relative clause before the head is more typical, while the occurrence of
relative clauses in post-head position is comparatively rare or unattested for.
Again, it is unknown whether the variation in position of a relative clause has
any impact on the interpretation.
Adverbs can occur as modifiers within the NP, or, more precisely: they modify
a verb, which is then nominalised. In this context, adverbs precede the
relativised clause; demonstratives typically occur before the adverb. Note that
this is in contrast to their occurrence in clauses, where the position of most
adverbs is relatively free (cf. §18.4.2).
a)
ßoaelu ne-nakauru katQa-uru
earlier be-those.who man-PL
'those who lived earlier'
b)
nii ßoaelu urarißa-uru
that earlier Urarina-PL
'those ancient Urarinas'
respectively. In (497c), there are two adverbs: kau occurs in initial position,
while the demonstrative kaa modifies the temporal adverb ena, which follows,
to mean "this now".
6.8 Summary
For several reasons it is not possible to represent the order of Urarina noun
modifiers in a hierarchical manner:
1. Some classes of modifiers are not homogeneous in that they contain some
members, which occur in one position, while others occur in a different
position.
2. Some classes of modifiers contain members that are variable and occur in
various positions.
It is observed that the variability with regard to the position to each other
mainly concerns word types with a high lexical load, i.e. adjectives, modifying
nouns, and nominalised verbs. These types, which happen to relate to noun-like
categories, typically occur adjacent to the head noun, but have a comparatively
free order amongst each other. In contrast, demonstratives, which have a more
functional use, have a relatively fixed position in the NP and need not occur in
adjacency to the noun. Numerals, which also are less noun-like than other
modifiers, are fixed in their position in that they precede the head noun;
however, their position with regard to other modifiers is comparatively free.
Quantifiers, (which are not a separate underived word class, cf. §5.11), exhibit
the most diverse order pattern as they do not constitute a homogeneous group.
While a hierarchical scheme for the order of noun modifiers is not a
favourable approach to their representation, certain tendencies can be
summarised as follows:
1. Demonstratives, numerals, and possessor obligatorily occur in prenominal
position. Demonstratives typically occur on the left edge of an NP.
2. Of all other modifier types, at least some members can occur in prenominal
position.
42
However, an overt object need not be present, but can be zero. In this case, a 3ps
object will be understood (also cf. §5.1.2).
a)
ajtQune kuane ama-ure neba rene
PLN inside take-3pl/E [mother place]
'They took her to the Rio Espejo, to her mother's place.'
b)
alau bihi beeuite nii unee
[spider.monkey hand] cut.off:3ps/E that kinkajou
'The kinkajou cut off spider monkey's finger.'
The word raj was already discussed regarding its functions as a postposition
'for'/'to' (cf. §5.7.4); beside this, it also functions as a beneficiary marker with
indirect objects (cf. §9.5). Another function of raj is as a possessive marker.
Basically, it occurs in two different contexts:
a) As an optional marker between possessor and possessum.
b) As a substitute for the 3ps pronoun in possessor function.
In its function as a 3ps possessive marker, raj intrinsically refers to the
semantic content o f ' h i s ' , 'her', or 'its', which can be derived from its origin as
the nominalised form of the verb raa 'receive': when the root /ra/ is combined
with the nominaliser -i with object reference, it literally means 'what he
received' (cf. §6.6.1). In this function, it typically occurs as a possessive marker
for 3ps with any possessum. Interestingly, it replaces the 3ps pronouns aka (3sg)
and akauru (3pl), which only very rarely occur in possessor function. While a
form such as aka lureri 'his house' has emphatic status and is extremely rare,
the representation as raj lureri is the unmarked form.
a)
ruaka-1 ama-ure raj loanari asae
carry-PRT take-3pl/E [POSS shed] under
'They carried him and took him under his shed.'
b)
ne-fioaufwajte raj nune
ITR-break.off-3ps/E [POSS branch]
'His branch broke off [the one on which he was sitting]'.
personal pronouns. Their form is identical to the free personal pronouns already
discussed in §5.5.
a) lsg:
d^anu=na kann bua basihjau-i-ta
why=INT [lsg bag] steal-2sg=FRS
'Why have you stolen my bag?'
b) 3sg:
ißa-ahe-ne aka komasaj
know-CNT-NEG:3sg/E [3sg wife]
'His wife doesn't know.'
c) lpl/in:
kana bihi afioera-1 hau-aka=ne=te taka-e
[lpl/in hand] follow-PRT throw-lpl/in=CND=FOC encounter-3ps/E
'If we throw it as if it would follow our hand, it hits.'
a)
β aara raj eruari temura sururuhu-u-tga
[[2pl POSS mosquito.net] edge] fix-IMP-EMF
'Fix the edges of your mosquito net!'
b)
akauru raj batia, akauru ruria ßäe nnri=ße-J amu-e
[3pl POSS pot] [3pl tub] already turtle=be-PRT walk-3ps/E
'Their pots and containers already turned into turtles'
Recall that the presence of raj is entirely optional, which is also supported by
e x a m p l e s such as (505b), where two possessive constructions occur in
enumeration, of which only o n e is marked with raj. In fact, the actual difference
between constructions with raj vs. those without it is not straightforward. While
speakers declare both forms as being identical in meaning, there is one
distinction, which will be discussed in §7.4 on inalienable possession. In any
case, the construction without raj is the unmarked, more c o m m o n form, while
its presence between possessor and possessum seems to indicate emphasis of
s o m e kind.
T h e possessive marker raj also occurs after possessors that are full nouns or
demonstratives, and with the interrogative pronoun for ' w h a t ' to mean ' w h o s e ' ,
but it is much less c o m m o n l y used in this context, as compared to its occurrence
after pronouns. In fact, the sentence in (506a) could also be interpreted as 'take
those intestines of his'. The example (506b), which involves the proper noun
' M a n u e l ' , is elicited and the reading without raj is the preferred one.
(506) Optional presence of raj between other types of noun possessors and
possessum
a)
nii (raj) suri ra-u
[that POSS intestines] receive-IMP
'Take the intestines of that one!'
b)
manoel (raj) saabere ne
[PSN POSS machete] be:3ps/E
'It is Manuel's machete.'
a) lsg:
ka=hitQana 'my blowgun'
k-enanihja 'my canoe'
b)2sg:
i=hitQana 'your blowgun'
d$=uba 'your mother'
Marking for 3ps possessive is optional and will be zero in many cases (cf.
(503)). While the cliticisation of the allomorph n= to vowel-initial nouns is
rather common, 3ps clitics with consonant-initial nouns are unusual. However, a
few cases for cliticisation of ni= are attested, one not involving a noun, but the
postposition tQoae 'on (top)' (cf. (508c)).
a) Allomorph n=:
n=itpau itQuterati-a=ne kujßa
3ps=life save-3ps/D=SUB so.that
'in order to save his life'
b) Allomorph ni=\
raaheniane ni=hitQana te-1, kuane nesari-tQuru-a nerajpe
self 3ps=blowgun give-PRT inside hunt-PL-3ps/D must
'They had to make their own blowguns and hunt with them.'
The use of the 3ps proclitic is not restricted to the singular, as becomes evident
from the following examples, where it occurs in plural context. Note that the
absence of a plural marker on the cliticised noun may not be a systematic
feature, as plural marking is highly optional in general. Possession with lpl and
2pl forms cannot be expressed by proclitics, but will be realised by a full
pronoun followed by the head noun (with the possibility of inserting raj).
a)
enene n=uhoana ha-uru-a katga-uru=ne hau
nowadays [3ps-field] make-PL-3ps/D man-PL-SUB because
'as the people already make their fields nowadays'
b)
aheri+ku-teru ke n=enanihja te-1
stone+ASC-axe INST [3ps=canoe] give-PRT
'making their canoes with stone axes'
The lsg proclitic ka= can be conjoined with the optional possessive marker raj
to karaj. The function of this form corresponds to kanu raj, with no apparent
difference in meaning. Again, the existence of two alternative forms probably is
the result of diachronic changes, since the use of proclitics is a feature of the
traditional language.
a)
ßäe tQu=ra noane saa-uru-a ka=raj kanaanaj-uru=ra
already CRNT=EMF PTY end-PL-3ps/A [lsg=POSS chi!d-PL=EMF]
'My children are gone already.'
b)
kaa tokoanel ka=raj kamanaj hano-a-e
this compared.to [lsg=POSS child] give.birth-CAUl-3ps/E
'He gave birth to my child like this.'
Interestingly, the lsg proclitic can also be combined with other postpositions. In
one case it is combined with the valency increase marker he. In another, ka= is
observed with the word for 'self to form ka=raaheniane Ί m y s e l f . However,
combinations with the possessive marker raj are not attested for the two other
proclitics.
a)
raj n=itQafioa t$oae kodoonete
[POSS 3ps=rifle] on heap.up:3sg/E
'It [the tree bark] heaped up on his gun.'
b)
raj n=arai-tQuru raj bi-a ktt-e
[POSS 3ps=family-PL] for tell-NTR go-3ps/E
'He went to tell his family'
The reason for this sort of double possessive marking could be explained by the
fact that the nouns involved in the above examples originally were inalienable
nouns and thus obligatorily carried the 3ps proclitic, which is not obligatory at
this stage. Since the proclitic is no longer perceived as a possessive marking, the
insertion of raj takes this function. However, there is an isolated example
shown in (512), which illustrates that double marking is also possible with 2sg
forms. Though the marking is of a different structure, the argument of
lexicalisation cannot hold, since combinations of nouns with first and second
person clitics are clearly perceived as bimorphemic. One can therefore conclude
that multiple possessive marking is an optional feature of the grammar. As far
as its function is concerned, it can only be speculated that some kind of
emphatic function is implied. The (rare) example below contains a free 2sg
possessor pronoun followed by a possessum that is cliticised with the 2sg
proclitic.
ere-m-u=ra
talk-DSTL-IMP-EMF
'Since they are like your family, you go talk to them!'
7.1.5 Summary
involving karaj, but this may be understood as a transitional form between the
traditional and the innovative language, as aspects of both variants (i.e. clitics
and unbound markers) have been combined. Nouns that are only marked with a
proclitic are typical for the traditional language and usually occur with formerly
inalienable nouns. Double marking is a comparatively rare phenomenon and
merely supports the hypothesis that this system in transition is subject to certain
instability.
Urarina has two verb-based strategies that refer to possession. One is with
siiria, a transitive verb for 'have'; the other involves the copula in combination
with a free or bound pronoun followed by the possessive marker raj.
For other forms than lsg, cliticisation is not possible, but the combination of
copula, full pronoun, and raj applies, as illustrated with lpl/ex in example
(514d).
The other strategy for indicating possession with verbs involves the verb siiria.
Unlike possessive verbs in many other languages, siiria is a regular transitive
verb without any apparent paradigmatical restrictions. It can take a causative
form and is regularly inflected for most (if not all) grammatical categories; there
even is a derived form of the verb that involves the intransitiviser ne- (cf.
§16.2): ne-siiriatia means 'get married', which might be interpreted as a kind of
intransitive form of "having" (a partner).
The possessive construction with siiria involves a "closer" kind of
possession than the copula construction. Basically, it refers to ownership or
long-term possession, as opposed to the copula strategy, which seems to imply
short-term possession. The expression for 'be pregnant', for instance, can be
represented as kanaanaj siiria 'have a child'.
a)
uhuae+kuturi kahe haja siiri-t$uru-a hau
deer+head from horn have-PL-3ps/D because
4
as they had a horn (made from) a deer head ...' [i.e. the village owned one]
b)
nihjauria nekajritQa-i=ße kuriki siiri-i=ße
don't suffer-2ps=NEGF money have-2ps=CND
'Do not suffer when you have money!'
a) With siiria:
enejtQH siiri-tpäu
monkey have-1 sg/A
Ί have a monkey [permanently, as a pet]'.
b) With copula:
ni-a ka=raj enejtQu
be-3ps/A lsg=POSS monkey
Ί have a monkey [temporarily, as a meal].'
43
-oka has the allomorph -koa. Also note that the final /a/ may be subject to elision when
followed by another vowel.
include terms that refer to kinship and body parts, which are most typical in
their occurrence with the verbaliser. Kinship terms also include the words for
' w i f e ' , 'husband', and 'child'.
(517) Derivation of kinship terms and body parts with verbaliser -oka
a) Kinship terms:
baj-oka
sister-VBL:3ps/A
'He has a sister.'
b) Body parts:
bihi-oka
hand-VBL:3ps/A
'It has hands.'
Similar to possession expressed by siiria, the derivation with -oka refers to long-
term possession. The use of this suffix is not restricted to the two types of nouns
mentioned above, but also occurs with other nouns, as the examples in (518)
illustrate. Further nouns to which -oka can be attached include enamhja 'canoe',
safioato 'shoe' (loan from Spanish zapato), saabere 'machete' (loan from
Spanish sable), and hiriki 'money' (loan from Quechua qullqi), which shows
that the suffix is not restricted to native words. What all these nouns have in
common is that they represent important possessions to the owner. Even though
they cannot be characterised as inalienable, they are related to long-term
possession. The functional difference between the suffix -oka and the verb siiria
cannot be determined at this stage.
a)
lureri-oka
house-VBL:3ps/A
'He has a house.'
b)
teru-k-ure
axe-VBL-3pl/E
'They have axes.'
Elicited derivations involving nouns that are not typically subject to long-term
possession, such as katai 'fishing hook' or barue 'masato' (cassava beer) are
considered "funny", but possible. As a second thought, these could be
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Possessive derivation 345
7.3.2 Prefix b-
There are a few words that occur with the prefix b-. One aspect that makes it
difficult to define the function of this element is that it is not productive and
only occurs with a few examples, mainly nouns. The reason for discussing it in
this chapter is that b- appears to be related to some kind of modifying
associative function. The other problem is that its occurrence is not limited to
nouns only, but is also found on one verb. Urarina speakers characterise the
difference in meaning between words that carry b- and those that do not as
being related to the differences between traditional and innovative language.
However, a complication is that its presence or absence is not consistently
linked to the traditional vs. the innovative language, as will become clear below.
The examples in (520) show the occurrence of b- as attached to a noun that
follows a proper noun; its function is to characterise the status or kind of the
preceding proper noun. 44
(520) Occurrence of b-
44
Due to the fact that the use of b- is not productive, the list of examples given in this
chapter can be considered nearly exhaustive.
H o w e v e r , with other examples, which do not involve proper nouns, the facts are
less clear. For instance, arasihje 'star' is attested without any d i f f e r e n c e in
m e a n i n g as barasihje in the same text. T h e distinction w a s characterised by the
(elderly) speaker as a variation, since people mix words of the traditional and
innovative language: whereas the forms with b- are described as part of the
traditional language, the innovative language tends not to attach this prefix to
nouns.
T h e prefix b- is also observed with at least one verb (no more are attested in
m y data), the verb (b-)asihjaua 'steal'. Again, the difference is linked to
diachronic factors, but, surprisingly, while basihjaua is characterised as the
standard term in the innovative language, asihjaua is considered part of the
traditional variation.
a) Without b-:
kwatia asihjau-ßa-ü
not steal-NEG-lsg/E
Ί have not stolen it.'
b) With b-\
unee bua basihjau-a alau=ne
kinkajou bag steal-3ps/D spider.monkey=CND
'When spider monkey stole kinkajou's bag' [Story title]
c) ' T h i e f :
basihja-uru-re=l asihjauto-oru
steal-PL-IRR:3ps/E=ASS thief-PL
'The thieves will steal it.'
N o t e that in the example (521c), the word for ' t h i e f , asihjauto does not carry
the prefix (and there is no variant in which it would). Thus, the developmental
stages by which language change has taken place remains enigmatic. A related
question m a y be in what w a y the nouns baaso and aaso for ' b a d ' and ' f o o l i s h '
(already discussed in §5.4.2), are related. In this case, there is a clear semantic
distinction; however, the relationship between the two words can hardly be
In all three examples cited in (522), the use of ku- is productive, as the first
noun can be exchanged for another noun with a similar semantic structure. For
instance, the same constructions could also be composed for 'wood axe', 'tapir
magic', or 'banana field', respectively.
A feature that all these examples share is that none of the examples in (522)
expresses a possessor-possessum relationship; on the contrary, the second
component of each compound appears to specify the first noun. For instance, it
is a "magic for peccary (hunting)", a "field for cassava (planting)", thus
45
The prefix is simplified to [k] before /u/ and to [kw] before other vowels.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
348 Possession
specifying the function of the first noun; with aheri+ku-teru, an "axe (made) of
stone", the first noun refers to the material. For the time being, I will refer to
compounds involving hi- as "associative type" compounds (ASC). Examples
such as the ones in (522) are in contrast to other compounds such as listed in
(523), which do not involve the prefix hi-.
Except for the example in (523c), all of the compounds in (523) can be analysed
as possessive constructions, which would also apply to further examples. 46 This
also demonstrates that hi- is not a marker generally used in compounds. It
should also be mentioned that all of the words that occur in second position of
(522) occur without hi- in other contexts. Interestingly, there are a couple of
words that contain hi- in their citation form and in some other environments,
but they lose it under specific conditions. The two words that are attested for
this particular behaviour with regard to hi- both refer to body liquids, as
illustrated in (524).
a) 'Fat':
kio-erene, erene 'fat' (citation form)
raana ho-erene 'pig fat'
raj ho-erene 'his fat'
oliba ho-erene 'olive oil' [Old Testament: Exodus 29:40]
kaa erene 'this fat'
erene somahaj 'white fat'
46
There are different possible analyses for the example 'water'+'urine' in (lc). Due to
the particular nature of the resulting liquid, any of the two components could be
interpreted as the head. If 'urine' is the head, the interpretation 'urine for (turning
into) water' would match the suggested analysis. If 'water' were the head, this
compound would be very unusual since there are no other known compounds in
which the first component functions as the head.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Possessive derivation 349
b) 'Blood':
hoitgana 'blood' (citation form)
raana hu-itQana 'pig blood'
kanu hu-itgana 'my blood'
nii itgana 'that blood'
itQana somahaj 'white blood'
It is evident that here, the function of hi- differs from its function observed with
the examples in (522), in particular with regard to possessive constructions:
while the forms in (522) strictly exclude hi- from constructions that convey
possessive meaning, the prefix clearly occurs in this context with 'blood' and
'fat'. The only reasonable way to explain this difference would be to assume
that the combination o f hi- with these two words is being lexicalised for some
reason.
However, what both examples from (524) have in common with other nouns
is the fact that they do not carry the prefix in combination with demonstratives
and with adjectival modifiers. The differences and similarities are summarised
in the table below.
As exemplified by the terms for body parts in (526), there is a high degree of
irregularity between the various nouns. First of all, it must be stated that all
nouns can also occur with the full pronoun instead of the proclitic (e.g.
kanu suri 'my intestines'). Some nouns that begin with a vowel, such as
alaarihja 'chest', take shortened allomorphs of the proclitics to indicate
possession while their citation form is without the 3ps proclitic n=. Others, such
as (n)anaae 'leg' differ from that in that they have two possible citation forms
(with or without n=). Yet other vowel-initial nouns always occur with /n/ in
their citation form while they occur without it when preceded by a possessive
proclitic for lsg/2sg (e.g. nuluntt 'neck'). Most nouns that begin with a
consonant (e.g. suri 'intestines') take (unreduced) proclitics for lsg and 2sg but
the possessive marker raj for 3sg (cf. §7.1.2). However, there are a number of
such nouns that are subject to further phonological changes when they occur
with a clitic; hanuri ( ' b a c k ' ) is only one example for this. Further examples for
such changes will be displayed in (529).
In the same way as body parts, kinship terms represent a semantic class of
nouns that can occur with a possessive proclitic, especially among older
speakers. Examples for this are given in (527).
While body parts and kinship terms represent natural groups of nouns that could
be expected to be inalienable, other nouns may occur with possessive proclitics
as well. These include items that are significant possessions relevant for daily
life, such as the words for ' b l o w g u n ' , ' f i e l d ' , and others, as illustrated in (528).
Other nouns of this type refer to types of fruit, fields, firewood, and even pets.
In contrast, wild animals that are not held as pets, such as 'jaguar' cannot be
combined with a proclitic. One speaker also rejected the cliticisation of ka= to
' p e c c a r y ' , until he remembered that someone in the village had actually raised
one; in this case, the occurrence with the proclitic is acceptable. The example
' m y grasshopper' is based on the supposition that this specific one will be used
as fishing bait. In any case, long-term vs. short-term possession is not a relevant
factor here, rather whether something can be possessed or not.
Note that even loans such as 'rice' can occur with a proclitic (cf. (528f)). In this
case, one could assume that the loan from Spanish arroz is quite old and thus
was subject to procliticisation before the loss of proclitics began. Alternatively
(or in addition to that), the loss of proclitics might be a relatively recent
development. In any case this emphasises the transitional state of many
examples.
As mentioned above, some nouns have different roots in their citation form
as compared to their occurrence with proclitics. The words in (529) represent
examples for this alternation. Note that these are not regular phonological
alternations of current Urarina but examples for systematic diachronic changes.
a) Body parts:
With proclitic Citation form Gloss Change
(traditional) (current)
ka=buu buku 'my bone(s)' Insertion of /k/
ka=naari nahari 'my liver' Insertion of /h/
ka=tia tihja 'my foot' Insertion of /h/
k-amihjaneo amianeo 'my work' Insertion of /h/
ka=hx>ii bihi 'my hand' /kw/ /b/; insertion of /h/
ka=tg,aitQU tahitQU 'my ankle' /tς,Ι /t/; insertion of /h/
ka=lueri lureri 'my house' Insertion of Irl
47
There are different words for 'child'. With kanaanaj 'child' (a generic, not strictly
relational term) raj can be used.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
8 Number marking
Singular is the formally unmarked form for number marking. Plural can be
marked on most nouns, including mass nouns or abstract nouns. In these cases,
the plural refers to 'different kinds o f (cf. §5.1 and examples in (534)).
Therefore, it is not practical to distinguish between countable and uncountable
nouns. Principles of number marking correlate with semantic subclasses of
nouns, in that most nouns related to location do not take plural. Plural is marked
on verbs, but can also occur on some postpositions (cf. §8.2). A plural marker
may cross-reference a constituent, most typically the subject of a transitive or
intransitive clause, or the object of a transitive clause under certain conditions to
be analysed in §8.3.
Note that the use of the term "plural" here is a simplification. Strictly
speaking, the term "non-singular" would be more precise for some areas of the
grammar. Specifically, this regards PSC verbs (verbs of posture, shape, and
colour; cf. §9.2.3), where a distinction between different types of number
marking is more complex - here, the term "non-singular" was adopted in order
to distinguish plural (which is more than four or five here) from dual, paucal,
and other forms, which are "more than one", but less than plural. For all other
verbs, this distinction is irrelevant, i.e. plural is in fact "any more than one". As
terms that would result from the "non-singular" terminology (such as "non-
singular-distributive" and non-singular-object") would be too inconvenient as to
use them throughout this entire grammar, I chose to employ the term "plural"
(glossed " P L " ) out of convenience, for all contexts other than with PSC verbs.
Urarina has two predominant plural suffixes. One is -t$e, which occurs with
verbs only; the other is -uru. The latter functions as a noun plural marker, but it
is found in a number of other contexts as well. For instance, it also functions as
a pluraliser in verbal marking for 3ps. Other suffixes referring to number are the
plural object marker -naha for transitive verbs, the distributive suffix -ahua,
and the plural marker -ana for stative verbs.
This chapter will analyse the use of these suffixes in detail. One thing that all
plural markers have in common is the tendency to be optional. While plural
marking on nouns or as an instance of morphological agreement on verbs may
be the more frequent option, it is not uncommon to use the singular form if
plurality is implied by the context. In relation to this, the correlation between
number and humanness will be examined (cf. §8.7).
Further peculiarities of number marking occur with position, colour, shape,
and colour (PSC) verbs. These distinguish different forms for singular, dual,
paucal, greater plural, and some for distributive plural, as investigated in
§10.2.1. As this way of expressing number has derivational character, it is
discussed in the chapter on word formation.
The verbal suffix -t$e occurs as a plural marker for contexts involving 2ps,
which involves 2pl subject marking on verbs in the declarative mood and for
imperative marking. It also functions as a politeness marking enclitic in
conversation between members of the opposite sex and in specific in-law
relationships (cf. §13.2).
a) With imperative:
lomaj kalaui raa-ni-tQU-tQe=ra
Lomai son receive-DSTL-IMP-PL=EMF
'Go and get (PL) the son of Lomai!' [Talking to a group of people]
In conversations between certain in-laws and between men and women, the
h o m o p h o n o u s enclitic =t$e is used as a polite form, independently of person.
For instance; in (533a), =t$e is attached to a 3sg form 'the trap snapped', since
the speaker is addressing his son-in-law. In (533b), it is cliticised to the neutral
form of the verb.
a) Talking to father-in-law:
ßäe raj nakana raj huru-a=tge bitoa, na-a=ne sajhjel
already POSS son-in-law for snap-3sg/A-PLT trap say-3sg/D=SUB although
'Though he said to his son-in-law "the trap has already snapped" ... [he did not hear
him].'
b) Talking to woman:
hoa bi-a=toe
don't tell-NTR-PLT
'Don't tell him!' [Conversation between man and women]
The plural marker -uru has a wider distribution than the suffix -t$e, since it can
occur on nouns, postpositions, and verbs, where it functions as a cross-
referencing plural marker for 3ps subjects. In (534), the wide range of the
occurrence of -uru (or allomorphs -kuru, -t$uru) is illustrated with different
subclasses of nouns. Except for relational nouns, place names, and some other
locational nouns, there are no semantic restrictions on the type of noun that can
be pluralised (cf. §5.1). When the plural suffix is attached to mass nouns such as
'water', 'fish', or 'banana', it refers to various kinds of referent. The plural
marker -uru also occurs with demonstratives and in the free pronoun for 3pl
aka-uru, (which is derived from aka for 3sg; cf. §5.5).
c) With demonstratives:
mi-t$uru=te eskiuela raj ne
that-PL=FOC school for be:3ps/E
'Those (things) are for the school.'
Note that plural marking on person names such as in (534d) is elicited and not
common otherwise. In this form, it refers to several families with the same
name. The plural marking on adjectives such as in (534e) is highly optional
(and elicited as well). In fact, the variant without the plural suffix is preferred.
The plural marker -uru is also observed with most postpositions, although
its use in this context is rather uncommon. It refers to the plural of the
postpositional argument, e.g. 'from the towns', 'into the prisons', etc. However,
these examples (both form the NT; (535c,d) are elicited) are described as "rare"
by Urarina speakers They are described as implying some kind of distributive
plural, such as 'out of each town', 'into various prisons', etc, as indicated in the
glosses. Example (535d), is not referring to several tables, but rather to different
areas on the same table. One can conclude from this that the (rare and optional)
presence of a plural suffix on postpositions emphasises the individuality of the
referents.
a) kahe:
nese-uru kahe-uru ku-ahva-i saku-ure atane tQoae katQa-uru
town-PL from-PL go-DSTR-PRT follow-3pl/E land on man-PL
'The peopled followed him out of the towns to the hills.' [NT: Matthew 14:13]
b) kuane:
karesero kuam-uru te-rate-naha-reheto-o=lu
prison inside-PL give-CAU2-PLO-HABl-lsg/E=REM
Ί used to throw them into prisons.' [NT: Acts 22:4]
c) kurerna:
lenone kurenia-kuru fzoanara te-ure
food for-PL banana give-3pl/E
'They gave bananas for various food items.'
d)tgoae:
mesa tQoae-kuru=te ne kuruataha-j radiofioonia(-kuru)
table on-PL=FOC be:3ps/E two-NOM radio(-PL)
'The two radios are on the table.' [i.e. on different parts of the table]
Similar examples for the plural suffix occurring on postpositions are also
attested for other postpositions, such as kaihje 'after', raj 'for', and ajjia 'with',
but not for the postpositions hana 'inside', asae 'under', and tiai 'until'. Since
the plural in combination with postpositions is rather infrequent in general, this
should not be taken as a reliable way to further classify postpositions.
A more regular use of -uru is as a 3ps plural marker on verbs. This applies
to all declarative (affirmative and negative) forms for all person inflection types
(A/E/D-forms), and to 3ps imperative forms (cf. §15.1.3). Interestingly, the
order of suffixation is different from the marking for 2pl. While the pluraliser
-t$e follows the suffix for 2ps, -uru precedes the person markers (cf. §12.2).
a)
hoara-he-uru-a=lu katga-uru
see-CNT-PL-3 ps/ A=REM man-PL
'The people were watching him.'
b)
enanihja kuane amu-uru-i~lu
canoe inside walk-PL-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'They did not go by canoe.'
Note that -uru has the allomorphs -kuru and -tQuru, as was discussed in §3.1.1.
Further alternations include the elision of the final /«/ before any suffix that
begins with /e/, such as in / m « k ö - « r a - e / ('catch'-PL-3ps/E) 'they caught her',
which realised as [ m u k a u r e ] . The initial /«/ of the plural suffix is assimilated
to [u] or [o], when the respective vowel precedes it: /molo-ura-a/ ('cut'-PL-
3ps/A) 'they cut it' surfaces as [moloorua].
The suffix -uru is also found in nominalisations. In a verb that is derived
with the agentive -era, the plural typically precedes the derivational suffix, as in
a) Order PL + AG:
katai kulane ate su-ur-era
hook without fish kill-PL-AG
'those who kill fish without a hook'
b) Order AG + PL:
eseneta-era-uru
believe-AG-PL
'those who believe it'
With verbs that contain the habitual aspect marker -reheto (cf. §12.2.6), an
optional double occurrence of -uru is attested with a number of examples,
which is shown in (538). (Note that the 3pl/E form -kure is actually composed
of -uru and the person suffix -e, but written jointly for convenience.)
Alternatively, plural can be marked only once, in either position (before or after
the habitual suffix): ne-rehete-kure=lu or ne-ure-rehete=lu (cf. §12.2.12)
Urarina has a suffix that marks plurality for the object of a transitive verb.
However, its use is restricted to certain conditions. A verb is obligatorily
marked with the suffix -naha under the following circumstances:
1. When the object is human and refers to 3pl, and
2. When the object does not surface as a noun or pronoun in the clause.
As shown in (539b), the plural suffixes for subject and object can occur in the
same verb.
a)
hoajtel hanii-ßaha-1 kiuajtel letoa-naha-a
again select-PLO-PRT again send-PLO-3ps/A
'Again he selected them and sent them again,'
b)
kaanii-tpa hau, su-ahe-naha-uru-a hau
sort.of-3ps/D because kilI-CNT-PLO-PL-3ps/D because
'As they did that, because they were killing them, ... [one of the young people said ...].'
a) Non-human referent:
kwara-kur-eni-a=ne tonoana
see-PL-NEG:3ps/E=SUB while
'while they did not see them [the jaguars]' [i.e. the men did not see the two jaguars
mentioned before]
N o t e that the anaphoric presence of an object noun need not be present in the
s a m e clause. When an object surfaces in a participle clause before the main
verb, the plural object suffix is not used. This is illustrated in (541), w h e r e
' p e o p l e ' functions as the object of the dependent clause 'inviting t h e m ' . In this
case, -naha is not marked with the main verb ' m a k e w o r k ' .
A special plural suffix, also discussed in §9.2.2, is the form -ana, which only
occurs on stative intransitive verbs.
a)
kotaeto-am-atQa-a tg,u=ra
be.tired-STPL-only-3ps/A CRTN=EMF
'They must be (really) tired.' (about the poles of the house)
b)
kareto-ana-a raj n=usitQue-ne hau
be.wide-STPL-3ps/D POSS 3ps=fingemail-SUB because
'because his fingernails are wide ...' [Example by Manus, p.c.]
Alternatively, plural can also be marked with -uru on a stative verb, which
would result in the variant kareto-oru-a 'they are wide' for (542b). However,
double marking is also possible, as the example in (543) illustrates. It is
unknown whether there is any semantic or pragmatic difference between the
three different ways of realisation. While the examples in (542) are from natural
contexts, speakers characterise the form in (543) (from elicitation) as an
additional appropriate variant to express plurality with a stative verb.
taba-ana-uru-a
be.big-STPL-PL-3ps/A
'They are big.'
48
Note that PSC verbs can take a different distributive plural form (cf. §10.2.1)
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Distributivepiural 363
condition, the object must be absent. However, different from -naha, the suffix
-ahva occurs with transitive and intransitive verbs. The subject plural marker
-uru may optionally occur, but plural reference is understood automatically.
Examples for the occurrence of -ahua with the plural object marker -naha or
with the 2ps plural suffix -t$e are attested in elicitation.
When the distributive occurs with a transitive verb, the distributive meaning
refers to the object. For instance, example (545a) implies that the speaker
caused different people or groups of people to work, at different times or places.
Thus, the distributive plural form correlates with S/O syntactic pattern, which is
different from the general S/A pivot on the syntactic level (note, however, that
this is unmarked; cf. §22.4).
a)
amia-rate-reheto-hua-u=lu
work-C AU2-H AB 1 -DSTR-1 sg/E=REM
Ί used to make each of them work.'
b)
uku ti-ahoa-l akauru letoa-e
needle give-DSTR-PRT 3pl send-3sg/E
'Giving each of them needles, he sent them.'
Urarina has three forms for lpl, based on a distinction between inclusive versus
exclusive, and dual, but this three-way distinction is realised in verbal marking
only. There are only two free pronouns for lpl, which are kana (including the
listener) and kanakaanu (excluding the listener), regardless of the number of
speakers involved. The verbal suffix -akatQe for lpl inclusive includes the
speaker and the listener, under the condition that the listener or the speaker
group consists of more than two. The suffix -akaanu excludes the listener and
refers to the group of speakers only. The dual suffix -aka includes the listener,
but the total of persons involved is not more than two. Even though the three
suffixes are grammaticalised, they can be split up into the following
components, morphologically (with some morpho-phonological alternations; cf.
§12.2.16):
--aka lpl/du: Base
- -aka-anu 1 pl/ex = Base + 1 sg/A
- -aka-tQe 1 pl/in = Base + PL
The dual form, which is the base form from a morphological point of view, also
represents the smallest number of participants, but it includes the listener. The
lpl inclusive form can be described as a morphological pluralisation of the dual,
indicating an increased number of listeners. The lpl exclusive form can be
analysed as a combination of the base form and the suffix for lsg/A, thus
emphasising the role of the speaker. In (546), examples for each form are given.
a) lpl/du:
huane=te kaa lejhn kari ama-aka=te hvara-kuru-mu
let's=FOC this one shell take-lpl/du=FOC see-PL-JUSS
'Let's take one of the shells so that they [the others] shall see it.' [One man to another,
as a plan between two]
b) 1 pl/ex:
uhuana ha-naanaha kiuituku-a-akaanu=lu
field make-LPP know-NEG-lpl/ex=REM
'We did not know where to make [our] fields.' [Narrator telling the author about how
they came into the Espejo area]
c) lpl/in:
d$aha-u=te lenone-tQaatQe na-1 ku raj beree-kuru
come.on-IMP=FOC eat-lpl/in say-PRT there POSS child-PL
ajjia ku lemne-htre
with there eat-3pl/E
'Saying "come on, let's eat", he ate there with his [three] sons.'
a)
itqa-kuru-a leotQa-uru
do-PL-3ps/A other-PL
'The others did it.'
b)
itulere rukuele ke=te ne-kurete-ure akauru
all.kinds things VLI=FOC ITR-buy-3pl/E 3pl
'They sell all kinds of things.'
However, personal pronouns and other subject referents are optional and
omitted most of the time (unless emphasis is intended or when the context
requires an implicit referent). Thus, in a typical Urarina clause, the question of
number concordance does not apply. However, even when a subject noun is
present, number concordance between subject and verb is not obligatory. One
possible, but not very common type of omission is to leave noun and verb
unmarked although the context is clearly plural. In (548a), for instance, plural is
not marked on either verb or noun, even though the context provides this
information. (The sentence is from a story where two men escape from two
jaguars).
a)
nete akauru ßasi-lanaala amu-e nix hanulari
but 3pl harm-without waIk-3ps/E that jaguar
'But without doing them any harm, those jaguar(s) went (away).' [About two jaguars
mentioned earlier]
b)
akauru ke itulere it^a-rate
3pl VLI all.kinds do-CAU2:3ps/E
'They sent them to do all kinds of things.' [About the patrons, mentioned in the plural
earlier in the text].
The most frequent type of lack of number agreement occurs between a noun in
the plural form and a verb that remains unmarked for plural. However, since the
absence of number agreement occurs with different kinds of nouns, the criteria
for omission of the plural form would be difficult to define, if there are any.
a)
ißoaelu ne-nakauru katQa-uru hetau =te eru-rehete
earlier be-those.who man-PL HRS=FOC find-HABl:3ps/E
'It is said that the ancient people found them.'
b)
eruari-uru ahaiße ne-ι ku-e
mosquito.net-PL paiche.fish be-PRT go-3ps/E
'The mosquito nets turned into paiche fish.'
a)
ena netohwei=te ate muku-ure katai ke
now until=FOC fish catch-3pl/E hook INST
'Until now they catch fish(es) with a hook.'
b)
βoaelu kahe hvaaune-l fivanara ki-akaanu
earlier from create-PRT banana eat-lpl/ex
'Since ever we have been eating bananas.'
Similar to the absence of plural marking between verb and subject, there are
limitations to plural agreement between the head of an NP and its modifiers.
This section investigates the morphological shape of noun modifiers in plural
context and it will become clear that animacy (more exactly: humanness) plays
a partial role for the presence or absence of number concordance. Further details
on the structure of the N P are discussed in §6.
N o t e that other options are possible, too: nouns with human reference can occur
without a plural marker, and, correspondingly, nouns that do not have human
reference, can bear a plural. However, note that (552b) is elicited and
understood as emphasising the fact that nitgatahaj lureri refers to something
like "all three houses". Thus, it appears that plural marking in this context, if
enforced, implies individuation and definiteness.
With quantifiers, the same regularities apply: nouns with human reference are
typically marked with the plural, while other nouns are not. Exceptions apply,
as illustrated in (553c,d).
In conclusion, one must say that "everything is possible", but not everything is
common. Animacy is at least partially relevant, as nouns with human reference
are more likely to attract plural marking than nouns that are lower on the
hierarchy scale for animacy. As example (553) suggests, the major distinction is
between humans and others, which leaves animals in the group of nouns
preferably unmarked for plural. However, due to lack of examples, it cannot be
stated whether there is a gradual tendency for the presence or absence of plural
marking between animals and inanimate referents.
Modifiers other than numerals and quantifiers do not have an inherent plural
reference, but they can take the plural suffix -uru. These include
demonstratives, adjectives, modifying nouns, and nominalised verbs in
relativising function (cf. §6.5). Different from numerals and quantifiers,
animacy or humanness does not have any impact on the presence or absence of
plural agreement with these modifiers.
Demonstratives do not exhibit any number agreement within the NP. Their
plural form, such as in mi-tQuru 'those' only occurs in contexts where they are
nominal heads themselves. There also are adjectival nouns that can be suffixed
with the plural marker (cf. §5.4.2). Some of these only occur in the plural when
they function as nominal heads themselves. One word, which commonly occurs
in the plural when functioning as a noun modifier, is leotQa 'other'. It is attested
with the plural suffix -uru irrespective of the animacy or humanness of the head
noun.
However, there are examples involving leotQauru that do not exhibit plural
agreement with the head. The NP in (554b) could also be expressed in a similar
way without plural marking on the head noun, as leotQa-uru amianenaa, which
clearly shows that number marking is an optional feature. The examples in
(555) demonstrates further variants: in (555a), the head noun is not marked for
plural; in (555b), leotQa lacks a plural marker in combination with a [+human]
head noun. (555c) shows a plural form on the [-human] head noun, but not on
leotQa.
The word leotQa exemplifies what is characteristic for other adjectival nouns as
well. For instance, the words baaso 'bad' and kauatQa 'good' are adjectival
nouns that occasionally occur in the plural form. As nominal heads, they refer to
'bad/good thing', respectively, and their plural form correspondingly describes
'bad/good things'. As noun modifiers, they can occur with human or non-
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Plural agreement in the NP 3 71
human nouns. While it is reasonable to assume that plural marking with baaso
and kauat^a is optional, there are no attested examples, in which they would
occur in the singular when modifying a pluralised head noun.
b) kauatQa:
mi katQa kauatga-uru
that man good-PL
'those good men' [NT: Matthew 23:35]
The word enamanaa, which also functions as a noun modifier, only occurs with
[+human] nouns, because of its reference to 'young man'. In all attested
examples with plural context, it exhibits number agreement with the head noun.
a)
enene itaau-nakauru enamanaa-kuru katQa-uru
nowadays live-those.who young.man-PL man-PL
'the young people who live now'
b)
aheri+ko-teru ke teru-kure=lu jioaelu ne-nakauru katQa-uru
stone-ASC-axe VLI axe-VBL:3pl/E=REM earlier be-those.who man-PL
'The people who lived earlier had stone axes'
a) With -era:
katQa rela-ur-era profiueta-kuru rihihei
man teach-PL-AG prophet-PL like
'like the prophets who taught the people' [NT: 2. Peter 2:1]
b) With -i:
kau m-rehete-kur-i katQa-uru
here be-HAB 1 -PL-NOM s man-PL
'the people who used to live here'
The relation between humanness and plural marking is again manifested by the
above examples. The following table gives an overview for the attested
examples of plural agreement with the different modifier types.
Plural aj;reement
Modifier with |+human] Ν with [-human] Ν
Numerals frequent rare
Quantifiers frequent rare
leotQa 'other' optional optional
baaso 'bad' optional optional
kauatga 'good' optional optional
enamanaa 'young (man)' yes no
REL with -nakauru yes no
REL with -era yes no
REL with -i yes no
REL with -naa optional optional
a)
itulere rukuele, hoata kahe itQa-mi-kuru
all.kinds things metal from do-PASS-PL
'all kinds of things, made from iron'
b)
ka=raj ii-tQa te-mhim-uru katQa-uru
lsg=for 2sg-only give-PASS-PL man-PL
'the people who were given to me by you / the people you gave me' [NT: John 17:8]
reference are more likely to be marked for plural than inanimate nouns. This is
particularly true for 3ps subject suffixes -uru and -ana, but does not apply to
the 3ps object suffixes -naha and -ahoa, which are obligatory in the respective
contexts. This corresponds to the occurrence of the 2ps plural marker -toe,
which also is obligatory in plural context.
The fact that number marking is further specified with PSC verbs is
intriguing, as a distinction between singular, dual, paucal, and plural is not
attested for other areas of Urarina grammar. The occurrence of a distributive
plural form also found with PSC verbs is paralleled by the distributive suffix
-ahoa for other verbs (though these are morphologically unrelated with each
other). The dual is distinguished for lpl with all verbs, but not in the set of free
pronouns. In conclusion, it can be stated that the number marking system
exhibits a high degree of asymmetry.
Urarina verbs can be formally divided into several classes with respect to their
transitivity. Principally, they fall into two major classes, transitive and
intransitive verbs, with a number of subclasses. In this regard, stative
intransitive verbs are distinguished from other verbs by a special plural suffix
that is only used with this subclass (cf. 9.2.2). Intransitive verbs that refer to
position, shape, or colour (called "PSC" verbs here) form a further subclass of
intransitives, which is manifested through regularities in the derivational system
(cf. §9.2.3). Reflexivity may be expressed by verbs that are prefixed with the
morpheme Tie-. These verbs might be considered an additional type of
intransitive verb, but it must be noted that the function of the prefix is not
mainly to mark reflexivity. Instead, it has general intransitivising functions that
may derive a reflexive or intransitive verb from most transitive verb roots (cf.
§9.3; §16.2). Within the class of transitive verbs, there is a subgroup of "affect"
verbs, which differ from others with respect to their derivational behaviour. In
particular, they can be intransitivised by some suffixes also occurring with PSC
verbs (cf. §9.2.3). Another interesting feature of the verbal system is that
Urarina has no ditransitive verbs, as is shown in §9.5. Verbs such as 'give',
which would be ditransitive in many other languages, are regular transitive
verbs that cannot be formally distinguished from others. Urarina also has a
copula, which carries out functions that partly apply to transitive and
intransitive verbs (cf. §9.6). Ambitransitivity is not a predominant feature in
Urarina, as is briefly shown in §9.4. Furthermore, there are some verbs that
refer to a question, plus a few more verbs with special properties. These do not
represent a homogeneous class; they are listed in §9.9. Interrogative verbs are
further investigated in §21.6.
The table in (562) gives a summary of distinct morphological features of
each verb class (and subclasses), listing the morphemes that are inherent to each
kind, but are not shared by other verb classes.
Intransitive verbs do not take an argument, apart from the subject. There are a
couple of suffixes that cannot be attached to transitive verb stems, but only to
intransitive verbs. These are the causativising suffix -a (cf. §16.4.2) and the
plural nominaliser -nakauru (cf. §6.6.4).
Urarina has three subclasses of intransitive verbs, which exhibit certain
morphological differences on the derivational level. They can be divided into
active intransitive verbs, stative verbs, and verbs referring to position, shape,
and colour. The latter also includes some verbs describing the "status" of a
subject (e.g. 'be cut'); these are derived from transitive verbs that describe
"affective" action such as cutting, breaking, or splitting (also cf. §9.2.3).
Typical active intransitive verbs are sinia 'sleep', ahia 'get drunk', and ua 'die'.
The semantic roles of these verbs do not affect their grammatical behaviour in
any way, as the subject can be an agent, patient, or theme. They can increase
their valency by the postposition ke, but note that this postposition is also used
with other verb types. This issue will be further discussed in §16.5. on valency
change, but two examples are given below in order to illustrate the function of
ke (whose use as an instrumental postposition is also discussed in §5.7.4). In
both examples of (564), ke is used because an additional argument [E] is used
with an active intransitive verb. In the first example, the intransitive verb 'live'
is subject to this. In the second example, the verb for 'climb', which is
intransitive can also be translated as 'go up(ward)'.
a)
nehelau itQau-naa ke itQau-uru-a=na hau
[other.(side) live-NOM VLI] [live-PL-3ps/D=SUB] [because]
[Ε] [V] [CNJ]
'because they live a different life'
b)
enua ari-l ke ini-uru-a=ne hana
[tree seek-PRT] [VLI] [go.up-PL-3ps/D=SUB] [when]
[DEP] [Ε] [V] [CNJ]
'looking for a tree, when they climbed it' (lit. 'when they went up "at" it')
49
The difference probably is of a dialectal nature. The Espejo dialect prefers the variant
with -ana. As a result of dialect mixing, the combination of both plural suffixes may
also be heard.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Intransitive verbs 379
The total number of Stative intransitive verbs might be around three dozen.
Thus, the verbs listed in (565) do not represent an exhaustive list, but partly
reflect the semantic distribution of Urarina stative verbs. The majority of verbs
in this subclass refer to physical property or dimension, but they also extend
into other semantic areas such as colour, difficulty, value, or human propensity
as can be seen from the rightmost column of (565).
It also is evident that many of these verbs contain the suffix -toa. The
conclusion, however, is not that -toa functions as a general marker for stative
intransitive verbs. This derivational suffix marks intensity or emphasis in
general and may also occur with transitive verb roots (cf. §10.2.3).
50
However, it should be mentioned that the stative plural suffix -ana may optionally
occur with the greater plural form of Type Β derivations (with no apparent difference
in meaning), e.g. as in lau-tura-ana-a '(they) are sitting down'. Also note that the
plural for small items of Type D derivations contains the form -ana, as in
lau-eka-ana-a 'they have been seated'.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Intransitive verbs 3 81
a) 'Be lying'
Small items Big items Position Shape
tuku-ee-koa tuku-a-ka be lying round and longish items
[tukweekoa] without a "mouth'Vopening;
e.g. pen, bin with lid on,
banana; soccer ball, egg
laa-e-koa laa-ka be lying on its flat and long objects that
back (face up) have a "mouth'Vopening;
e.g. ship, person (lying on
back); banana leaf
me-e-koa mi-a-koa be lying on its flat and long objects that
face (face down) have a "mouth'Vopening;
e.g. ship, person (lying on
back); banana leaf
heku-e-koa heku-a-ka be lying on its narrow and flat (longish)
side things; e.g. canoe with a
load on one side only; also:
dog; person; gumboot
tutoa-e-koa tutga-a-ka be lying straight long items; e.g. snake
se-e-koa si-a-koa be lying long items; e.g. rope, snake,
tortuously, piece of cloth
slightly bent
bau-e-koa bau-a-koa be lying partly on long or flat items; e.g. pole,
top of sth., stand pen, notebook
out, also leaned
on top of sth.
daraa-e-koa dara-a-koa be lying together, round items without a
next to each other mouth; e.g. rifle shell; cf.
tukueekoa
b) 'Be standing'
Small items Big items Position Shape
dzuhu-e-koa d$uhu-a-ka be standing high/tall items with one or
two long legs; e.g. pole,
slipper standing; chicken,
soccer goal, pifayo tree
te-e-koa tii-a-ka be standing items with four legs; e.g.
dog, house, fish in water if it
looks as if having feet,
crocodile with raised body,
millipede, monkey
teru-e-koa teru-a-koa be standing on its wide and thin items; e.g.
edge slipper; notebook on its
edge
c) 'Be sitting'
Small items Big items Position Shape
lau-e-koa lau-a-ka be sitting short items (not tall); e.g.
bird, monkey, dog,
gumboot, renaco tree (with
many roots)
baba-e-k)a baba-a-koa be sitting together, e.g. people
next to each other
d) 'Be hanging'
Small items Big items Position Shape
hjunu-e-koa hjunu-a-roa be hanging, fixed long and tight, e.g. cable,
(small but at two points rope for drying clothes
long)
lefoa-e-koa lekoa-roa be hanging (not long items; e.g. rope
tightly), fixed at (banana-shaped)
two points
d^ato-e-koa d^ato-a-roa be hanging down soft items that bend/fold
easily; e.g. rope over a
branch, towel
fioii-tQoa fiuii-a-ka be hanging and wide items; e.g. hammock,
spread out mosquito net
tihii-tgoa tihii-a-ka be hanging at one unspecified shape, e.g. bag,
end of a rope, be bottle, pot
hanging down
There are further verbs that can take suffixes according to the size of the
subject, which do not exactly refer to posture. In particular, these are verbs that
describe shapes and colours. The productivity of the derivational suffixes with
these verbs is slightly lesser than with position verbs, which are almost 100%
compatible with the suffixes. In combination with shape verbs, some gaps occur
in the paradigm (cf. §10.2.1); the three verbs describing the basic colours black,
white, and red are fully compatible with the derivational suffixes.
There also are some verbs referring to shape that are not compatible with size
suffixes at all, as they are members of the stative or active intransitive verb
classes. These include examples such as muluutoa 'be thick', karatoa 'be
long', or haräatoa 'be wide', which are stative verbs that take the plural suffix
-ana. The verb mahiitga 'be pointed' is an active intransitive verb, regarding its
morphological properties. The same applies to the colour verb berauesiohwaa
'be green', though it is unclear from what root it may be derived. The verb
seems to be of newer origin and can also refer to 'blue'; traditionally, the
Urarina distinguish only black, white, and red, which is in correspondence with
cross-linguistic tendencies.
A further verb type that can be combined with the size suffixes discussed
above are what could be called "affect" verbs. These include verbs of cutting,
tearing, splitting, smashing, stabbing, or other processes that reduce or mutate
the shape, integrity, or size of an object - a group of about 30 verbs. However,
there are certain limitations to the productivity of size suffixes within this
group:
1. The definition of "affect" verbs is restricted in that it does not include verbs
such as 'hit', 'kill', 'push', etc., but only those referring to one of the
activities listed above.
2. Out of the verbs that match this definition, most, but not all are compatible
with size suffixes.
3. Those that are compatible with these suffixes do not take the entire range of
suffixes from the paradigm, with differing degrees of compatibility. This is
exemplified with the verb saua 'cut' in ex. (607) (§10.2.1).
9.3 Reflexivity
9.4 Ambitransitivity
b) Intransitive use:
muku-a enua
burn-3ps/A tree
'The tree burned.'
Apart from the verb mukiia, no other ambitransitive verbs are known.
9.5 Ditransitivity
Urarina has no ditransitive verbs. When a verb requires more than the t w o
thematic roles of agent and undergoer or theme, its valency is increased by ke.
However, there are no verbs that would require a participant marked by ke as its
basic argument structure. Verbs that typically take a goal or recipient in other
languages are transitive in Urarina. A recipient phrase can occur as a
beneficiary postpositional phrase (PP) with almost any verb. There are some
verbs that frequently take a PP with the postposition raj 'to/for', which also
functions as a possessive marker (cf. §7.1.2 on possession; also see §5.7.4). T h e
verbs that most commonly occur with this postposition include verbs of saying
and verbs of giving.
a)
nihjauria kati saate-nana-a=ne na-e hetau
[don't black.monkey kill-ILT-3ps/A=NEGF] [say-3ps/E HRS]
[QUOT] [V]
mi eene raj
[that woman for]
[PP]
b)
na-e hetau noe raj kana+kivaaun-era
[say-3ps/E HRS] [Noah for] [lpl/in+create-AG]
[V] [PP] [S]
'... said God to Noah'
There are three further verbs of speaking, all of which are intransitive. The
following examples illustrate each of these in combination with a raj-phrase,
which refers to the listener o f an utterance.
itg,a-e=lu
[do-3ps/E=REM]
[V2]
'As God said so to him, he did it.'
Another verb of speaking is bia, which can be translated as 'tell' on the one
hand, but also as 'advice' or 'announce' on the other. In contrast to the verbs
illustrated in (572), bia is transitive.
a)
te-ι turu-i hetau raj be-ure
[give-PRT] [arrive-PRT HRS] [for] [tell-3pl/E]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [PP] [V]
'Handing over [Lomai's son], arriving, they told it to [the Creator of Ways].'
b)
nii raj katai be-ure
[that for] [hook] [tell-3pl/E]
[PP] [Ο] [V]
'They showed [lit. "announced"] the hooks to that one.'
The fact that the ra/-phrases shown with the above verbs function as an adjunct
is easily shown through the examples in (574), where the verbs bia and ajtoa
occur without any mentioning of the goal or undergoer, i.e. without raj. The
same structure also applies to the other verbs of saying.
a) bia:
dede kahe ni-a komasaj bi-a=na hau
[sky from be-3ps/A wife] [teIl-3ps/D=SUB] [because]
[QUOT] [V] [CNJ]
'because he told (them) that he had a woman from heaven'
b) ajtoa:
enua ra-a ht-i=ße kujßa=na ajto-ö=ni
[wood take-NTR go-2ps=SUB so.that=FOC] [say-lsg/E=WIT]
[DEP] [V]
Ί told (you) to go and fetch wood.'
a) d$alua 'distribute':
akauru raj lenone d^alu-e
[3pl for] [food] [distribute-3ps/E]
[PP] [O] [V]
'He distributed food to them.'
b) tia 'give':
akauru raj eruari te loinaj
[3pl for] [mosquito.net] [give:3ps/E] [PSN]
[PP] [Ο] [V] [A]
'Lomai gave them a mosquito net.'
In the same way as verbs of speaking, 'give' and 'distribute' may also occur
without explicit mention of a recipient/indirect object, which clearly shows that
the involvement of the raj-phrase is not part of their argument structure, as is
shown with tia in (576).
a)
h-i -jie kujßa=ne te-ü
[eat-2sg=SUB so.that=FOC:lsg] [give-lsg/E]
[DEP] [V]
Ί gave [it] [to you] so that you would eat it.'
b)
hjauijie te-i-toe=ne
[don't] [give-2ps-PL=NEGF]
[INTR] [V]
'Don't give [it] [to him]!'
a)
m=hitQana ti-a nerajße
[3ps=blowgun] [make-3ps/D must]
[O] [V]
'He had to make his blowgun'
b)
aheri+kuteru ke n=ertanihja te-1
[stone+axe INST] [3ps=canoe] [make-PRT]
[PP] [O] [V]
'making their canoes with stone axes ...'
There also is another verb for 'give'; which is clearly transitive. The verb sia
could substitute tia in most examples (except for 'make'), but in practice is
mainly used in the imperative form when asking for something. Different from
tia, the recipient functions as the Ο argument, whereas the item to be given
must be marked with the valency increase marker ke, such as illustrated below:
a)
atii katai ke kam Sl-u
b)
ßäe ii si-ri-tQäu-ni
[already] [2sg] [give-IRR-lsg/A=ASS]
[ADV] [Ο] [V]
Ί will already give you.'
The fact that the verbs o f saying and giving are either transitive or intransitive
verbs, eventually leads to the conclusion that Urarina has no ditransitive verbs.
The verbs under investigation are transitive verbs that can take a beneficiary as
an adjunct. Thus, the insertion o f a phrase with raj can be characterised as an
adjunct. Note that there are no formal criteria for the distinction between
arguments and adjuncts. This becomes even more evident through examples
with verbs whose argument structure does not imply an indirect object, such as
'work', 'be difficult', or the copula 'be' (cf. (579)).
a)
amiane-reheto-a=lu fioatoro-kuru raj
[work-HAB 1 -3ps/A=REM] [patron-PL for]
[V] [PP]
'He used to work for the patrons'
b)
tabauru raj kalta-e
[some for] [be.difficult-3ps/E]
[PP] [V]
'For some it is difficult'
c)
akauru raj aaune+baka, erene+kutuuhue, nii-tQuru ni-a
[3pl for] [plantain+soup fat+fried.food that-PL] [be-3ps/A]
[PP] [O] [V]
'There were for them plantain drink, fried food, all that.'
9.6 Copula
51
It is impossible to determine whether the copula is "transitive" or "intransitive".
While morphologically, it lacks the distinctive properties of a transitive verb (such as
the compatibility with passive and agentive morphemes), on the syntactic level, the
copula resembles a transitive verb (cf. §18.1), as the copula complement occurs in
object, i.e. clause initial position and the copula subject follows the verb, in the same
way as the subject of a transitive verb.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
392 Verb classes
intransitive verbs when it occurs with a copula subject (CS) only, but resembles
a transitive verb when a copula complement (CC) is present (cf. §9.6.1). In
relation to existence, the copula takes only a subject (cf. §9.6.4), while with
other functions, a copula complement is involved. The copula complement
relates to the following functions:
- Identity or equation (cf. (§9.6.1)
- Attribution (cf. §9.6.2)
- Locative or NP followed by a non-locational postposition (cf. §9.6.3)
- Existence or temporary presence (cf. §9.6.4)
Additional features of the copula include its functions in possessive
constructions (cf. §9.6.5), and as an auxiliary (cf. §9.6.6).
One function of the copula complement relates the subject of the predicate to a
specific identity or states an equation between the two (but the difference is not
formally marked). As with other verbs, the subject does not obligatorily surface
as an NP, but can be marked by a bound pronoun (i.e. a person suffix) on the
copula. The constituent order corresponds to that of a transitive clause, with the
copula subject in postverbal position and the copula complement in preverbal (=
object) position. The subject can be shifted to the front when a focus marker is
used.
N a m e s only occur as copula complements if the copula subject is the noun for
' n a m e ' . Otherwise, there are alternative constructions to express naming. O n e is
with the quotative verb naa for ' s a y ' , as illustrated in (582b). The e x a m p l e in
(582c) shows the use of the c o m p o u n d verb kuraa+tia ( ' n a m e ' + ' g i v e ' ) for
naming.
(582) Naming
a) With copula:
kanu kuraa=te hiväa
[lsg name=FOC] [PSN] [be:3ps/E]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'My name is Juan.'
9.6.2 Attribution
In §5.4 it was stated that Urarina has no homogeneous class of adjectives, but a
number of adjective-like words, with a range of properties that may differ from
word to word. One of the features mentioned was the possibility for a word to
occur as a copula complement (which does not apply to all adjective-like
words). However, some are indeed found as copula complements and again,
their position can be clause-initial (object position) or following a fronted
copula subject (cf. (583b)). Note that examples with the adjectival noun plus
focus marker are not attested, which could be due to the fact these mainly
function as modifiers.
b) With focus:
itQasu itea-naa=te baaso
[brother do-NOM=FOC] [bad] [be:3ps/E]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'What my brother does is bad.'
9.6.3 Locative
a) With noun:
akuuhua ni-a ka=eruri
[entrance] [be-3ps/A] [this=snail]
[CC] [V] [CS]
'This snail was in the entrance.'
In other cases, the copula complement is a postpositional phrase with other than
locational reference. For instance, it can also involve a non-locational
postposition such as ajjia ' w i t h ' or raj ' f o r ' .
a) With ajjia:
kalaui ajßa ni-a nil kati hau
[son with] [be-3ps/D] [that black.monkey] [because]
[CC] [V] [CS] [CNJ]
'as that black monkey was with child'
b) With raj:
mi-tQuru=te eshoela raj jie
[that-PL=FOC] [school for] [be:3ps/E]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'Those things are for the school.'
W h e n the copula is used with the copula subject only, its function m a y relate to
existence (being permanent or temporary). T h e copula subject occurs in
postverbal position as this is the regular position for a subject (cf. §18). In
e x a m p l e (586b) the copula subject is syntactically complex ( ' s o m e t h i n g f o r
hunting without s u f f e r i n g ' ) .
a)
pukalpa ni-anu-ne bana
[Pucallpa] [be-lsg/D=SUB] [when]
[CC] [V] [CNJ]
'At the time when I lived in Pucallpa'
b)
raj lureri asae ni-a=ne here nii raj kakunu
[POSS house under] [be-3ps/D=SUB] [want:3ps/E that POSS daughter]
[CC] [V] [Main]
'Her daughter wanted her to stay in her house.' (= Locative copula complement)
9.6.5 Possession
The copula subject in combination with the possessive marker raj (lit. ' f o r ' / ' t o ' )
marks possession (cf. §7.2.1). Typically, this involves a proclitic attached to raj,
such as in fc?=ra; (lit. 'for me'), which follows the copula in existential function.
Examples such as in (588), literally mean '(it) is there for me', which makes it
plausible to compare this construction to the one mentioned in (585b).
However, the constituent order is different, as the copula must precede the
possessive. As shown in (588b), the corresponding negative form implies non-
existence or non-presence (literally 'my axe is not there'). 52
a) Affirmative:
ni-a ka=raj pekepeke
[be-3ps/A] [lsg=POSS] [boat.engine]
[V] [CC] [CS]
Ί have a boat engine.'
b) Negative:
m-ji kanu teru
[be-NEG:3ps] [lsg axe]
[V] [CS]
Ί do not have an axe.'
9.6.6 Auxiliary
Urarina has a construction in which the main verb of a clause is suffixed with
the participle form and followed by a copula. The copula in this construction
hosts all inflectional suffixes normally found on the main verb. For instance,
instead of marking plural, negation, and person on the verb root /k«ra/ 'name'
in (589a), this verb receives a participle suffix and the inflection (except for the
distributive suffix) is marked on the copula. Literally, the translation would
result in 'they were not being with names'. Alternatively, the copula could be
omitted and the verb would surface as kura-hahua-ur-em ('name'-DSTR-PL-
NEG:3ps/E). The difference between the two variants is unclear, as speakers
describe meaning of both constructions as "exactly the same". The variation
occurs in the traditional as well as in the innovative language and is observed in
different dialects. However, there is variation between speakers: some regard
52
The presence or absence of raj depends on factors discussed in §7 on possession.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
398 Verb classes
the combination of participle and copula as "colloquial". At this stage, the exact
difference between the two alternant forms cannot be confirmed. One might
preliminarily characterise the function of this construction as a matter of style.
a)
ipoaelu aj-a=ne rihihel kuraa ke kura-hakioa-l
[earlier AUX-3ps/D=SUB like] [name VLI] [name-DSTR-PRT
[DEP] [PP] [V]
ne-ur-ene
be-PL-NEG: 3 ps/E]
'They were not with names like in ancient times.'
b)
lesahei, ßäe kanaanaj siiri-ϊ ni-a =ne
[once] [already] [child] [have-PRT be-3ps/D=CND]
[ADV] [ADV] [Ο] [V]
'once, when she was already having a baby' (= when she was pregnant)
The construction occurs with transitive as well as with active intransitive verbs,
but there are no attested examples for stative or PSC verbs being followed by
the copula. However, the copula itself can be the main verb of the clause, as
shown in (590). This results in two copulas occurring in a sequence, the first
being suffixed with the participle form and the second carrying the inflectional
suffixes.
a) Affirmative:
nitoanei ni-a=ne
like.that be-3ps/D=CND
'when it came to that / when it was like that' [i.e. that the woman was about to give
birth]
b) Negative:
nijei kana+huaaunera beree ne-i ni-ji
[not.at.all] [our.creator child] [be-PRT be-NEG:3ps/A]
[ADV] [CC] [V]
'He is absolutely not a child of God.'
In a few examples, the participle form of the copula before another verb has the
meaning of 'become' or 'turn into'. This is the case in certain examples with the
motion verbs kua 'go' and amua 'walk' (also cf. §18.3). However, this function
can be characterised as an idiomatic complex predicate since it is only attested
in this specific combination. In general, there is no formal distinction between
'be' and 'become'.
a) With amua:
tariatga rn-i amu-e
[turtle] [be-PRT walk-3ps/E]
[CC] [V]
'They turned into turtles.'
b) With kua:
kaum raj eruari ahaijie ne-1 ku-e
[3pl POSS mosquito.net] [paiche.fish] [be-PRT go-3ps/E]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'Their mosquito nets turned into paiche fish.'
Apart from the copula, Urarina has an auxiliary aja that functions as an
intransitive "dummy" verb and refers to any action previously mentioned or
known through the context. There may be an explicit mentioning of the verb it
is referring to, as in (593), where aja refers to the transitive verb 'destroy'. This
example also shows that the verb aja is referring to may have any transitivity
value, while aja itself is intransitive.
ka=d,z)aura+atane itahe-ri-t$au=ni=tQa
[this=flesh+world] [destroy-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS=EMF]
[01] [VI]
Alternatively, the auxiliary can refer to an action that is obvious from the
context but not explicitly mentioned by a verb in the clause preceding it. In
(594), the semantic content o f 'doing so' refers to 'urinating', which had been
mentioned several sentences before in the course o f the story (as indicated by
the free translation preceding the sentence containing aja).
[Preceding: 'So she squatted and urinated, and she urinated very much. Therefore she
kept on flooding the earth. The water already came flooding the hall; there they were
playing the flute. The water kept rising, and even though they were dancing on and on,
she was doing it (aja). When the water was rising up to their ankles, they kept on
dancing and playing the flute and drum, and when the water rose up to their calves, they
danced and still did not want to release h e r . . . ' ]
ku hajti aj-ahe-i saku-e
there still AUX-CNT-PRT follow-3ps/E
'She still kept on doing so there.'
N o t e that, in the same way as other intransitive verbs, aja can occur with any
inflectional suffixes (cf. §12). In addition, the auxiliary is also used as a short
form for affirmation or negation, ajanu ( A U X - l s g / A ) and aj-i ( A U X -
N E G : 3 p s / A ) are common forms to express 'yes' and 'no', respectively (also cf.
§14.4.4). A n example for its use as a negator is given below. In this case, aji is
understood as referring to the situation as a whole: 'it is not so'.
Under certain, very specific conditions, the copula is obligatorily omitted. Most
typically, verbless clauses occur as questions that involve a demonstrative, such
as illustrated in (596). Both examples contain the demonstrative kaa 'this'
(surfacing as a clitic in (596b)) and an interrogative pronoun. Example (596c)
illustrates the impossibility of using a copula in this context. The sentence is
ungrammatical, because it does not contain any deictic device such as the
demonstrative. The correct way to express 'What is this?' would be d$a htal
b) Cliticised demonstrative:
d$a raj ka=teru
[what for] [this=axe]
[CC] [CS]
'Whose axe is this?' (lit. 'for whom')
c) No demonstrative: ungrammatical
*d$a ni-a / *d$a ne
[what] [be-3ps/A] what be-3ps/E
[CC] [V]
(To mean: 'What is it?')
raj nuhue=na mi
[POSS excrement=INT] [that]
[CC] [CS]
'Is that its excrement?' [Pointing at the intestines of a peccary that is being cut into
pieces]
There also are examples for verbless clauses that do not contain a
demonstrative. However, these have deictic reference only provided by the
context, as the speaker is pointing at the object he is referring to. An important
difference to the ungrammatical example in (596c) is that verbless constructions
with this kind of deictic reference only occur with polar questions, but not with
content questions. Also note that the interrogative clitic =na is obligatory in this
context.
a)
ii enejtgu=na
[2sg monkey=INT]
[CC]
'Is (that) your monkey?' (Pointing at the monkey on the girl's lap)
b)
ii raj=pa
[2sg for=INT]
[CC]
'Is it yours?' (Pointing at the notebook on the table)
Another way to indicate deixis is with the word mihoa 'look here/there' or
'this/that is ...', comparable to the French voici/voilä. It is used with declarative
function only.
a)
nukwa ii lenone
look.here 2sg food
'Here is your food.' (Giving it to the listener)
b)
rtukwa raj nuhue
look.here POSS excrement
'This is its excrement.' [Holding the peccary's intestines in his hand]
A verbless clause can also occur as a reply to a verbless question of the type as
illustrated above. For instance, a question such as 'whose is this?' may have the
answer kamt raj (lsg + POSS) to mean '[it's] mine.' These and further cases of
clauses that lack a verb can be characterised as results of ellipsis that occur as a
reply to a question, mainly realised as one-word utterances. For example, the
reply to the question 'who did it?' could be kanu T ; or the question 'what did
you cook?' may be answered as riiru 'howler monkey'. A more common way
to answer these questions, however, would be to include a full verb, such as Ί
did it' or Ί cooked howler monkey'.
Urarina has a number of verbs that do not form a homogeneous class, but which
exhibit unusual features that are not compatible with the properties as defined
for the verb classes discussed in this chapter. The following list gives an
overview of these verbs, with reference to the chapters in which they are
discussed.
The numeral verbs for 'one' through 'five' may also be added to this list.
However, note that not all numerals behave in the same way (cf. §5.12). Thus,
they are not regarded a separate verb class.
Urarina morphology does not only exhibit a large number of inflectional forms
(cf. §12), but also has a complex system of derivation. On the one hand, this
involves word class-changing derivation, such as the various types of
nominalisation and the (less productive) verbalisation (see §10.1). On the other
hand, there is a wide range of verbal derivations, which do not involve a change
of word class. While it is impossible to describe the system in its entire
complexity (there might be as many as three dozens of verbal derivational
suffixes), the most productive processes will be investigated in §10.2.
Reduplication (see §10.3) is another instance of word formation that applies to
verbs. Urarina has no less than five different types of verbal reduplication (plus
subtypes), each of which have a slightly different grammatical function. There
also are a number of different compounding types, most of which result in
complex nouns. These are investigated in §10.4.
All morphology in Urarina applies to either nouns or verbs, with verbs being
predominant in attracting affixes, whereas only few affixes occur on nouns. As
a result, any word-class changing derivation either changes a noun into a verb
or vice versa.
There are a number of further examples for zero derivation that do not involve
the final root vowel /e/. In the same way as the examples in (602), the nouns in
(603) can be assumed to be derived forms of the respective base verbs, all of
which are intransitive again.
The semantic structure of the nouns resulting from this kind of derivation is
rather heterogeneous. While quite a number of nouns refer to abstract concepts
such as 'sound', 'sleep', or 'drunkenness', others refer to physical persons or
materials. For some nouns it may be implausible to assume that they are derived
from verbs, such as 'light' would derive from 'shine, or 'blood' from 'bleed'.
The derivation could also apply in the opposite direction. The decision has to be
postponed to future studies.
Derivation with -oka is the only productive process that derives a verb from a
noun root. Since this verbalising suffix has already been discussed in §7.3.1, I
will only summarise its function here: Derivations with -oka (or allomorph -koa,
after vowel sequence) most typically refer to long-term possession, such as in
lana-oka 'she has a husband'. The suffix only applies to certain nouns, which
include terms for kinship and body parts, but also other important possessions.
Another case of derivation that has already been previously mentioned is the
use of verbal inflection forms such as the participle form or personal suffixes
with some nouns (cf. §5.16). The examples for this include words such as
hanuri-i 'turning one's back' (from hanuri 'back') and kuri-1 'applying jagua
fruit' (from Jairi'jagua fruit'), but this type of derivation is not productive.
Verbal derivations that form another verb from an existing one are very
common and follow a complex set of rules. In fact, the division into different
subclasses of intransitive verbs is based on these distinctions. There is a set of
derivational suffixes that exclusively applies to verbs of position, shape, and
colour (PSC verbs), and to certain "affect" verbs (as defined in §9.2.3).
Sufflxation of these morphemes to a verbal root may determine the transitivity
of the emerging verb. For instance, one group of suffixes creates intransitive
stative verbs (Type A); another has an inchoative function (Type B). Type C
derivation generates a transitive verb, and Type D reflects a "caused state", as
exemplified in (604) (also cf. §9.2.3).
b) Paucal:
tuku-erihja+tuku-erihjaa
'be lying', about round lengthy items; here: four rifle shells.
c) Greater plural:
na-baba-akoa
'be sitting together', about persons as couples; here: various couples being seated in one
place.
d) Distributive plural:
te-roa
'be standing', about items on four or more legs (incl. houses); here: various settlements
in different parts of the river, one not visible from the next one.
The number distinctions with Type Β derivations are fewer and slightly differ
from Type A. Here, the paucal form refers to "two to maximally four", due to
the absence of a specific dual form. Again, there is an overlap between the
53
It is obvious that the presence of four or five subject items could be represented either
by the paucal or by the greater plural form. The choice depends on whether the
speaker regards the number as "few" or "many" in the light of the context.
paucal and the greater plural, as the latter may be applied with a presence of
four or more subjects. A distributive plural form does not exist for this
derivation type. Derivation types C and D are different again, as they only
distinguish between singular and plural, including what would be paucal or
greater plural with Types A and B.
The derivations listed here are nearly 100% productive for all position verbs,
with a few exceptions where a verb may not be compatible with all the forms.
In addition to these verbs, the same suffixes may also be combined with certain
other verbs. These include some verbs that refer to shape, such as mauekoa 'be
short', habeehoa 'be round', or tuniehoa 'be narrow' just to mention a few.
These behave like posture verbs as they are entirely compatible with the
derivational suffixes mentioned above. With Type Β derivation for inchoative
function, this implies that something "becomes" round, short, or whatever shape
is relevant. The same principle also applies to the verbs that refer to the colours
'black', 'white', and 'red'.
There is an additional group of verbs that can undergo some of the
derivational processes described here. These are derived from specific transitive
verbs that involve cutting, breaking or other kinds of action that affect the
integrity of an item (cf. §9.2.3). With these verbs, the suffixation of size and
number suffixes is much less productive than with the other verb types; i.e.
suffixation of the respective ffix is not possible. The table in (607) shows the
most productive example of compatibility between an "affect" verb and the
derivational suffixes under investigation.
plural
Type Β
Singular *sau-turaa *sau-lenia —
(4+)
There are three suffixes that describe the degree to which an activity or process
is performed. Except for a few cases, these all refer to states related to posture,
shape, or colour; this applies to active intransitive and transitive verbs as well,
which may be converted into PSC verbs. The productivity of each suffix differs
with respect to the verb types it is attached to. In the tables (608) to (613), I
have indicated the degree of productivity by referring to the estimated quantity
of verbs found with each derivation type.
Diminutive "-eri"
The suffix -eri (or allomorph -heri) can be attached to any verb type, with
different degree of productivity. The transitivity value of each verb is not
affected by suffixation -eri. With PSC verbs, the suffix occurs after the
respective size suffix, as in lau-eho-eria 'be sitting a little'. While this suffix
implies a "small" subject when occurring by itself, size tends to be neutralised
in combination with -eri. Though the corresponding form for big items as in
lau-ako-eria is theoretically possible, speakers prefer to use the form for small
subjects (lau-eho-eria) to refer to big items as well. For most verbs, a size
distinction is either uncommon or impossible, as indicated in (608). The
semantic function of -eri refers to 'a little', 'not entirely', or 'partly'.
As indicated in the far right column of (608), the suffix -eri is less productive
with verbs other than PSC and affect verbs. While most affect verbs can take
this suffix, there are only a few other transitive verbs that can occur with -eri.
With active and stative intransitive and with verbs intransitivised by rte-, the
suffix is slightly more productive.
Diminutive "-heriiri"
Another diminutive suffix, -heriiri (or allomorph -eriiri) expresses 'very little',
referring to a lesser degree than -eri. This morpheme describes states that occur
only ' a tiny little bit'. It is less productive than -eri, as it is not observed with
position or shape verbs, and it is not attached to any transitive verb. However, it
can occur with colour verbs and with active and stative intransitive verbs, as
well as with reflexive verbs.
A further distinction of degree is expressed through the suffix -ohwa, which has
the phonologically-conditioned allomorph -kohwa and the variants -koa and
-hiohioaa, whose distribution is not predictable, but which refer to the same
semantic concept. The meaning of these suffixes involves the notion of
' m e d i u m ' , 'not entirely but almost', 'more or less', or 'quite', which expresses
that a state or action has not been entirely accomplished to its normal degree,
but to a higher degree than with the other t w o suffixes (-eri and -heriiri). -ohwa
and its variants are very productive as they can occur with verbs of any class,
with minor differences in productivity. The transitivity value of a verb remains
unchanged. Some verbs can take two variants of this suffix without any
apparent distinction in meaning. Other verbs take only one specific form;
however, the distribution of the different variants cannot be tied to specific
subclasses, as is evident from the examples below. Size distinctions again vary
according to the type of base verb.
Urarina has two derivational suffixes that are attached to verbs in order to
express velocity or duration. Both convey the idea that something is performed
quickly or with one single motion. One of the suffixes goes a step further as it
refers to an action that happens 'passing by', or 'for a short moment only'.
There also is a general intensifying suffix that has a wide range of functions.
Suffix "-ahaito"
The suffix -ahaito (or allomorph -haito) refers to short duration and describes
concepts such as '(while) passing by', 'quickly', 'easily with one movement',
'once', 'for a short moment', frequently translated as de paso in Spanish.
Remarkably, it transitivises stative intransitive, but not active intransitive verbs.
Furthermore, it is not compatible with PSC verbs. When suggested in
elicitation, speakers refer to the form with -laito as having a similar function.
Thus, the minute conceptual difference between the two suffixes, which lies in
duration vs. velocity, is neutralised for these verbs. This makes sense in so far
as an expression such as 'make stand (while) passing by' would be hard to
interpret.
Suffix "-to"
The suffix -to, as illustrated in (613), can be characterised as a general
intensifier. It is found with all verb classes except position verbs. Its function
includes a range of meanings, such as 'strongly', 'deeply', 'very', 'quickly',
'actually', or 'various times', much depending on the context and the verb -to is
used with. With shape and colour verbs though, a special function is involved,
as the suffix then refers to 'for a short moment', i.e. it has exactly the function
as otherwise assigned to -ahaito (cf. (612)). A clause such as 'be red for a short
moment' will usually imply 'something red occurred for a short moment, (e.g.
while passing by)'. Another observation about shape and colour verbs is that
they only occur in the form for "big" items. It is also possible to create an
intensified form of shape and colour verbs, but in this case, other suffixes have
to precede the intensifier -to. Since these morphemes are not productive
otherwise, they will not be discussed here.
Stative verbs represent a yet different case as many of these inherently
contain the suffix -to, which with some examples may be identifiable as the
intensifier. However, this does usually not imply an intensifying function of this
suffix. In fact, nearly all stative verbs that contain -to do not have a form
without it. Also note that suffixation of -to never changes the transitivity of a
verb.
There is another pair of derivational suffixes that may be mentioned here. The
suffixes -ruruka and -ruruhja combine functions of distribution and motion, for
big vs. small items, respectively. For instance, hoitgam-rurukaa can be
translated as 'be moving bleeding at various parts' (based on the root for
'bleed'), about big items; whereas muku-ruruhjaa (based on ' b u r n ' ) means ' b e
moving burnt at various parts', but referring to small items. Examples are
observed with transitive, intransitive, affect, and stative verbs, but it is unclear
whether these suffixes are compatible with other verb classes.
10.3 Reduplication
Urarina has five different kinds of verbal reduplication, two of which have
additional subtypes. Their functions exhibit a high degree of overlap between
aspectual interpretation ('repeatedly'), spatial distributive ('in various areas'),
and motion ('move/run'). The table in (614) gives an overview of the attested
types. All types are instances of total reduplication; differences between the
various types are indicated by additional morphemes such as suffixes.
It should be noted that most types are very productive with PSC and affect
verbs, but do not or hardly occur with other verb classes (except Type 3). Thus,
it may not be surprising that some reduplication types occur as "pairs", each
distinguished for big and small items, as is observed with suffixal derivation. In
fact, each type of reduplication is enriched by the addition of other segments
that are partly also found in suffixal derivation, such as -akoa and -ekoa with
Type la and lb reduplications, respectively. The productivity of each
reduplication type is summarised in (615), which illustrates the major role PSC
verbs play for this type of word-formation.
(615) Summary of productivity with reduplication types for different verb classes
Exactly the same function as for Type l a applies to Type l b reduplication, with
the difference that it refers to small subjects. An additional difference is that
there are a few active intransitive verbs that can be subject to this reduplication
type. In this case, the interpretation can be aspectual, such as in 'talk several
t i m e s ' , (but also implying 'in different places'; cf. (617)). With these verbs, the
size distinction is neutralised.
Type 3: RED-e+R-eka
Another reduplication type adds the vowel /e/ to the first component (the
reduplicant) and the suffix -eka to the second. It significantly differs from the
types listed above in various aspects: firstly, no size distinctions apply to the
verbs that are subject to reduplication. Secondly, the productivity is a mirror
image to the other types, as PSC verbs are not compatible with this form,
whereas transitive and intransitive verbs are. However, there are only a few
stative verbs that are found with this type of reduplication. Remarkably, their
meaning in combination with this reduplication type corresponds exactly with
the "motion + state" function of Type la ('be moving in a certain way'),
whereas this is not the case with other verb classes and Type 3. The function
with these verbs is of an aspectual nature to imply 'regularly', 'repeatedly',
'again and again', or 'as a habit'. The transitivity value of a verb is not affected.
Type 4: RED+R-a
Another reduplication type related to aspectual function is formed by simply
reduplicating the root and adding the respective person suffix to this stem (or,
the neutral suffix in citation form). Its function involves the quick repetition of
an action in short intervals (except with stative intransitive verbs where it refers
to various "parts" of a state). 'Repeatedly' here implies that something is done
once and then again after a short break. There can also be a connotation of a
progressive form 'now', which depends on the context. For example, sau+saua
may imply 'he is cutting it quickly several times in a sequence', as indicated in
(621).
With PSC verbs, the meaning slightly differs from this, as it shifts to a more
spatial function, such as 'in various parts'. The example mee+mia 'make lie
down' explicitly implies a distributive function, meaning that the object(s) are
put to various places, such as leaves that are laid on the ground in order to dry
them. There is a variation in interpretation, which may also imply 'various
times'. It should also be noted that all PSC verbs become transitive when used
with this reduplication type. However, this does not apply to the other
intransitive verb classes. Another difference between PSC and other verbs is
that the distributive meaning only applies to the former, whereas an aspectual
meaning applies to the latter. Note that with reflexive verbs, only those derived
from affect verbs may undergo Type 4 reduplication. Otherwise, this form
occurs only with a few active and stative intransitive verbs.
Type 5: RED+R-eri
Reduplication with the addition of -eri is restricted to PSC and affect verbs also.
The diminutive function as it occurs in derivations with -eri does not apply to
Type 5 reduplication. Instead, this form has a distributive function, meaning 'in
various parts'. This corresponds to the meaning observed with Type 4
reduplications. The difference is again based on size distinction: Type 5
explicitly refers to small items, whereas this is not the case with Type 4. With
Type 4, PSC and affect verbs imply the involvement of a 'big' subject, (but note
that this meaning does not necessarily apply to the other verb classes with this
form).
10.4 Compounding
Nine more or less productive types of compounding can be identified. All types
involve nouns in some way, and each type has its own semantic structure. In
most cases when a verb is involved the head of the compound will still be a
noun, sometimes through nominalisation of the verb. However, the occurrence
of verbs in compounds is comparatively rare. Only in one type of compounding
is the verb the head of the construction (cf. (632)). Except in compounds that
involve the associative marker hi- (cf. (625)), the interpretation of the internal
structure is hardly predictable, that is, it is mainly a matter of lexicalisation
and/or intuitive interpretation. In most compound types, the second element
(typically a noun) functions as the head. Deviations from this occur with such
cases where the compound can be interpreted as a noun-modifier construction
similar to the ones observed with adjectives. The table in (623) gives an
overview of the common types of compounding.
Type 5, which is rather rare, has the same properties as Type 4, with the
difference being that the first part of the compound is a verbal root.
Type 7 is very rare as only two examples are attested. It involves a noun
followed by a verb root that functions as a relativising modifier. This is unusual,
as such a construction would normally involve a nominalising suffix, such as
described in §6.6. Instead, there is no morphological marking on the verb
whatsoever, which implies that its occurrence could be interpreted as a kind of
zero derivation. Similar to the examples in (603) further above, one could
postulate that the verb root in the examples in (630) represents a derived noun.
Note that plural marking is applied to the compound as a whole, i.e. after the
second component. The example nuhte+suru 'tributary river' can be
characterised as being highly fossilised, as not all speakers recognise the
component /suru/ as the root of the verb 'run'.
There also are a few examples of compounds that exhibit the structure verb +
noun, with a similar function as Type 7. For instance, homo+enua is a 'tree that
has fallen', which points at a relativisation of the noun. Slightly differently,
simhera is not simply a 'companion who sleeps', but more specifically refers to
a 'companion to sleep with'.
Type 9 is the only kind of compound where the verb is the head, such as the
term for 'advice', which literally means 'give heart'. One could possibly argue
that these constructions are in fact phraseologisms or instances of idiomatic
expressions. However, in this case, their tonal structure should be predictable
f r o m the noun, as the noun determines on which syllable of the verb a High tone
will occur (cf. §4.1). While the prediction is correct for suna+bia and
hikoala+tia in (632a), it does not hold for suuhua+tia, where the noun should
therefore assign a Η tone to the final syllable of the verb, according to its tonal
type. While this may imply that it is a lexicalised compound, the low number of
examples suggests that it would be premature to draw final conclusions.
In a related construction (cf. (632b)), the verb of this compound type is
nominalised with the agentive suffix -era (cf. §6.6.2), which results into a N + N
compound with Ν1 being the object of the nominalised verb N2.
a)
suuhu+tia 'heart' + 'give' 'consult', 'advice'
suna+bia 'afternoon' + 'announce' 'make a sound to announce the
afternoon' (as done by cricket)
k-ukwala+tia 'younger sibling' + 'give' 'give birth to another child'
b)
mami+hioa-era 'beard' + 'throw away'-AG 'razor' (lit. the one that
throws away the beard')
kunu+muku-era 'light' + 'burn-AG' 'lighter' ('the one that
burns the light')
katQa+kuhiounaka 'man' + 'image' + 'pull out'-AG 'camera' (the one that
+ ruku-era takes man's image')
There a few examples for compounds that do not match any of the types listed
in this section. These do not appear to follow productive patterns but some shall
be listed here.
It should also be mentioned that there is a verb root that is combined with the
interrogative pronoun d^a or a demonstrative to form the verbs as shown in
(634).
In this chapter, I have described the most prominent aspects of Urarina word
formation, which reflects the complexity typically found in Amazonian
languages. Particularly interesting is the derivation with size suffixes and their
further division into different number types, as this is not found elsewhere in the
grammar. The variety of postures expressed by the wide range of verbal roots is
another prominent feature of Urarina morphology, which is further
complemented by a range of reduplication types with different degrees of
productivity. There also is a number of compounding types, which most
typically result in a noun as the output of the morphological process.
It is understood that the information given in this chapter merely scratches
the surface of word formation in Urarina and leaves ample opportunities for
future studies.
Each Urarina verb can occur with up to three different verb forms in the
grammatical categories of person and polarity marking (and, partly, irrealis). I
distinguish these forms in the following way:
- D-form: occurring in finite dependent clauses only
- Α-form: 3sg is -a
- Ε-form: 3sg is -e
While one may feel tempted to describe these types as "conjugation", this term
could be easily misinterpreted. The phenomenon that is known from other
languages, such as the Romance languages, is fundamentally different from
Urarina in that in a language such as Italian, the class of verbs is divided into
subclasses that each take a specific set of inflectional markers. In Urarina, the
distinction is not inherent to the verb, but depends on the grammatical context
in which a verb occurs. That is, every verb can be inflected for any of the three
types if it occurs in the respective context. Similar phenomena are known from
a few other languages only. For example, some Arawak languages such as Bare,
Warekena, and Baniwa mark a focussed subject by a special cross-referencing
prefix in addition to other inflectional categories (cf. Aikhenvald 1995: 152). In
the Chadic languages Hdi, Lele and Mina, there is a morphological distinction
between "pragmatically independent clauses" and "pragmatically dependent
clauses (cf. Frajzyngier 2004). Different paradigms for person marking are also
reported for Menya (Trans New Guinea Phylum; cf. Whitehead 1987: 41) and a
few other Highlands languages of that area. Menya has two sets of subject
cross-reference markers the choice of which depends on the division into final
and medial verbs. However, a threefold distinction into different paradigms, as
found in Urarina may be considered unique.
In Urarina, the forms occurring in independent clause are further
distinguished according to a variety of conditions, as will be investigated in this
chapter. To make a choice with regard to the terminology, I will refer to the
different forms as "(Person) inflection classes" or "(Person) inflection types",
alternatively. This seems appropriate as the most prominent differences between
the forms appear on the person suffixes.
The distribution of the different forms for each person inflection class in
Urarina is subject to a complex set of conditions from different grammatical
areas. There are grammatical contexts that obligatorily require the choice of a
certain form and others, which influence the choice of form, but which
represent only tendencies. In (635), the obligatory conditions are listed in
summary. It should be mentioned that the citation form is also identical with the
neutral suffix -a, but it cannot be determined whether this suffix is simply
homophonous or whether polysemy exists between either of these forms. The
occurrence of the Α-form in greetings is marginal, since only two greetings are
known (cf. § 11.3). The most crucial areas of distinction are clause type and the
presence of a focus marker. The occurrence of the D-form is restricted to one
single context only, which is in (finite) dependent clause. The Ε-form is
required in any sentence that contains a focus marker. Further distinctions
between Ε-form and Α-form are observed in different types of interrogatives.
(635) Summary of obligatory contexts that determine the choice of person inflection
type
Context A-form E-form D-form
Citation form obligatory impossible impossible
In greetings obligatory impossible impossible
In polar questions obligatory impossible impossible
With introducer buatia obligatory impossible impossible
In content questions impossible obligatory impossible
FOC marker precedes verb impossible obligatory impossible
In dependent clause impossible impossible obligatory
It is evident that the contexts listed in (635) cover only a small part of the
grammar, as they refer to very specific, mainly syntactic structures. The
restriction of D-forms, which exclusively, but obligatorily occur in dependent
clauses, narrows down the choice of forms in other environments to the two
remaining types, Α-form and Ε-form. Their distinction, however, is subject to
non-obligatory contexts, which involve polarity and syntactic complexity, as
well as style. Details will be investigated in §11.2 and §11.3. The table in (636)
gives an overview of the factors that play a role when obligatory conditions (as
listed in (635)) do not apply.
(636) Summary of optional contexts that influence the choice of person inflection
type
11.1 D-form
The distribution of the D-form is the one easiest to describe, as it is only found
in one environment. It occurs on the finite verb of a dependent clause, usually a
subordinate clause. Other dependent clauses, such as the participle clause or the
complement clause cannot be inflected with the D-form as these are marked
with non-finite markers, while inflectional features are marked on the main verb
only (cf. §20). The same structure occurs in different subject complement
clauses (cf. §20.2). A subordinate clause is generally marked by the enclitic
=ne, which has a variety of functions and may or may not occur with
conjunctions. However, I have chosen the term D-form (for " D e p e n d e n t "
clause) since it is common practice to omit this marker (while still using the D-
form of the verb). In addition, speakers of the younger generation have
developed a complementation strategy, which is formally identical with
subordination (cf. §20.1.1). In (638), some examples for the use of the D-form
are given. These involve different types of dependent clauses. Examples (638a-
c) show the "regular" (i.e. traditional) contexts in which the D-form occurs. In
these examples, the subordinate marker =ne is present with different functions.
In (63 8d), however, it is absent. This example exhibits the innovative use of the
D-form in a complement clause with hau (for details, cf. §20.1.2.2).
11.2 E-form
There is one context that strictly requires the choice of the Ε-form: this is the
case when a sentence contains any constituent in focus position. For instance,
the presence of a focus marker in a sentence always results in the marking of the
inflected verb with suffixes from the Ε-form. The exact functions of focus
marking are discussed in §19.1. There are three enclitics that mark focus, whose
distribution depends on person and number marking. The enclitics =ne and =rw
mark l s g and 1 pi, respectively, but are subject to free variation (i.e. =ne can
mark lpl and =na can mark lsg, depending on speaker preference and dialectal
variation). The marker =te is used for all other contexts and thus is the most
frequent one. The units that are marked for focus do not strictly coincide with
constituents, but as a tendency, they do so in most examples. Most typically, the
focused items are a N P (in any function), an adverb, or a conjunction phrase (cf.
§19.3). These may include a particle, such as the hearsay evidential hetau in
(639c,d).
hana
when
Ά certain tree killed a woman when she went to visit her daughter.'
the Ε-form, while the verb of the dependent clause is marked with the D-form.
hano-ore
spend.night-3pl/E
'As they went to hunt at night, they spend the night there.'
a) With 'who':
d$a=te najfle-re kivara-a ku-a=ne=ta
who=FOC be.able-IRR:3ps/E see-NTR go-3ps/D=SUB=FRS
'Who would be able [to find out] if he went?'
b) With 'what':
d^a=te itga-e, nitoanel kanaanaj-uru rela-~i=ta
what=FOC do-3ps/E like.that child-PL teach-PRT=FRS
'What does he do, teaching the children like that?'
c) With 'why':
d^anuMe kaaunei k=aj-te-kure=ta
why=FOC like.this lsg=AUX-INTS-3pl/E=FRS
'Why are they doing [that] like this to me?'
d)
d^atoanei=te kuhwu-ure katQa-uru=ta
how=FOC fish-3pl/E man-PL=FRS
'How did the people fish?'
focus marker, it is also obligatory for the Ε-form to occur with an interrogative
even when no focus marker is present. In (642), content questions involving
'who', 'how', and 'where' are used without a focus marker, but the verb in each
example is still inflected with the E-form.
a) With 'who':
d$a kaa ajte
who this say:3ps/E
'Who said this?'
b) With 'how':
d^atoarm-tQa=ra sini batiri=ta
how-only=EMF sleep:3ps/E priest
'How (on earth) does the priest sleep?'
c) With 'where':
d$u ku-re-u
where go-IRR-lsg/E
'Where would I go?'
All other contexts in which the Ε-form is observed are non-obligatory. There
are, however, environments in which this type is strongly preferred as opposed
to the Α-form. One such environment regards sentences in which the regular
constituent order OVA/VS is modified to AOV/SV by a frontshift of the
subject, but without the use of a focus marker. Recall that this type of
construction with content questions clearly requires the use of the Ε-form, as
demonstrated in (642). With affirmative sentences, there is a strong preference
for the Ε-form, as shown in (643). However, the fronting of a constituent
without a focus marker is very rare, and bound to very specific conditions (cf.
§18.3).
Exceptions from this are mainly found with the negative form, such as shown in
(644). In this example, the subject is in focus position. The use of a focus
marker is excluded by rule as it does not co-occur with a negative clause (cf.
§19.2.4).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Ε-form 439
a)
ßäe nehano-a=ne haa ke turu-e
already give.birth-3ps/D=SUB PURP VLI arrive-3ps/E
'The time to give birth already arrived.'
b)
mi bajahirii ßäe turu-a u-e
that shortly.after already arrive-NTR come-3ps/E
'Shortly after that, he [the monkey] already arrived.'
c)
mi hau, ßäe mi rihel atii suuh-e
that because already that like nevertheless hide-3ps/E
'Therefore, he hid himself like that nevertheless.'
Another non-obligatory context in which the use of the Ε-form is typical (and
usually more frequent than the Α-form in the same context) is in combination
with complex syntactic structures. Characteristically, what I describe as
"syntactic complexity" here involves a dependent clause that precedes or
follows the main verb. In many cases, this is a subordinate clause (cf. §20.1),
but it may also be represented by a complement clause or by a participle clause.
Some examples are given in (646). I generalise this context as being a "complex
syntactic structure" as opposed to simple sentences that involve a single clause
only. Regarding the example from a narrative in (646a), it cannot be stated for
certain whether the choice of the Ε-form is due to style or a result of complex
syntactic structures. Therefore, a similar example is also given from a non-
narrative text in (646b).
ke ii baha-re-it-ni
VLI 2sg ask-IRR-1 sg/E=ASS
'If there is anything to say, I will call you at the time you said.'
The examples in (647) illustrate the use of the Ε-form in a sentence that
contains a participle form. Since these are from a conversation, i.e. a non-
narrative text type, it can be excluded that genre is the relevant factor for the
choice of person inflection type.
narrative text types. The importance and ranking of the various conditions is
further discussed in § 11.4.
11.3 A-form
Similar to the Ε-form, the Α-form is obligatory in a few contexts, and optional
(but typical) in others. As a general tendency, the distribution of the Α-form is
less restricted than the Ε-form. While its presence is excluded from any
sentence that contains a focus marker (or which involves structures that imply
focus, such as content questions), the Α-form is found in most other
environments. Its use is less common in narratives, but still possible, especially
under certain conditions that will be investigated in this section.
Two marginal contexts in which only the Α-form occurs are the citation
form of a verb and greetings. Any verb, when cited in isolation (for instance, as
a reply to the question 'what does this verb mean in Urarina?'), occurs with a
final -a (or allomorph), which represents the 3sg form of the Α-form. However,
this form does also correspond to the neutral form, which is used as a non-finite
marker on verbs in serial verb constructions (cf. § 17) and in prohibitives with
Java (cf. §15.2.2). Since there is no way of determining whether the citation
form exhibits polysemy with one or the other, or whether this is in fact
homophony, it cannot be stated with certainty that the suffix in citation forms
really is an instance of the Α-form. However, since speakers intuitively interpret
a verb form such as letoaa (cf. (648)) as 'he sent him', 1 will assume that the
citation form indeed represents an instance of the A-form.
(648) Suffix -a
The Urarina do not traditionally greet each other. However, nowadays two
expressions are used, probably as a result of the influence of Spanish.
Specifically, these are used as counterparts of buenos dias ('good morning',
'good day') and buenas tardes ('good afternoon'). The expressions used for
these greetings do not literally correspond with this meaning, as they are
intransitive verbs whose meaning refers to the daylight conditions: hanoa
literally means 'clear up', 'become light', and sua refers to 'become dark (at
dusk)'. These verbs are used with the 3sg/A form and combined with the final
emphasis marker ra.
There also is a word that is used for 'thank you', but its origin is less clear than
for the two greetings mentioned above. The expression naria, (which is fully
lexicalised, whereas the other two greetings may still be understood in the sense
of light conditions) could have its origin as a composition of the 3ps object
proclitic n= and the verb for 'seek', occurring in the 3ps/A form. If this were the
case, the literal meaning of naria would be 'he has sought it' and would involve
an instance of the Α-form, similar to the other greetings. However, this remains
mere speculation, since no diachronic evidence is available.
Another condition that obligatorily requires the use of the Α-form is in polar
questions, being affirmative or negative. This is illustrated by the examples in
(650) for affirmative polar questions.
a)
he, tunakuri-a jiaara raj kioairi
hey function-3ps/A 2pl POSS ayahuasca
'Hey, does your ayahuasca work?' (asked by Lomai after offering ayahuasca to her
visitors)
b)
raj hoit^ana ra-uru-a=ne huaasi-tQuru-a=na
POSS blood receive-PL-3ps/D=SUB be.afraid-PL-3ps/A=INT
'Are they afraid to take its blood?' (referring to a bowl of peccary blood)
a)
ta nahari heri-a ka=d^uhu-he-j=jie
NEGQ liver want-3ps/A this=stand-CNT-NOM=NEGF
'Does this one who is standing here not want any liver?'
b)
ta u-ri-tQa=i ii komasaj=jie
NEGQ come-IRR-3ps/A=ASS 2sg wife=NEGF
'Won't your wife come?'
Another context that requires the use of the Α-form is in negative clauses, when
they co-occur with the negative introducer hvatia 'don't' (cf. §14.4.1). In this
case, the Ε-form cannot be used.
All other contexts in which the Α-form occurs are non-obligatory, but represent
tendencies. There are two contexts where this person inflection type is
extremely frequent: in "short" utterances and when the main verb is marked for
3ps negative. A "short" utterance can be defined as one that consists of an
inflected verb only or an inflected verb with maximally one NP or adverbial. In
these cases the Α-form is overwhelmingly typical; only a few examples for the
Ε-form are attested in this context. As the examples in (653) illustrate, this does
not only involve utterances that may be understood as answers to questions (cf.
(653a)), but also short observative statements as the ones in (653b), that
occurred in a picture description. Even in narratives, which otherwise prefer the
Ε-form, the final sentence that indicates the end of the story typically is a short
statement in which the Α-form is used (cf. (653c)).
b) (Picture description):
iani-a usi
burn-3ps/A fire
Ά fire is burning.'
c) (End of narrative):
ßäe sa-a
already end-3ps/A
'It is finished.'
Another typical context in which the Α-form is preferred is in verbs that are
marked for 3ps negative. The suffix -/, which occurs in this case, is much more
common than the corresponding Ε-form -eve. Interestingly, this applies to all
genres, including narratives, where a preference for the Ε-form would be
expected. The examples in (654) give evidence for this with sentences from
different text types. Both examples are taken from a narrative about the life of
the ancient people. While the use of the Ε-form is prevalent elsewhere in the
text, the majority of verbs that are inflected for 3ps negative in this text occur in
the Α-form. N o n e of the sentences can be characterised as "short", and both
examples contain a subordinate clause, which was mentioned as a typical
trigger for the Ε-form. Also note that the negative introducer fauatia is not
involved here.
a)
nii hau heriane enanihja itQa-kuru-i=lu, atane
that because probably canoe make-PL-NEG:3ps/A=REM land
b)
nii baja enane ne-nakauru nijej nitoane-j
that after nowadays be-those.who not.at.all be.like.that-NOM
The presence of the Α-form in this context demonstrates that some factors
which determine the choice of person inflection type are ranked higher than
others. Apparently, the criterion "3ps negative" is more significant than the
criterion "narrative style". It must be emphasised that this applies only to non-
obligatory contexts. In environments that obligatorily require a particular form,
such as a sentence involving a focus marker, these tendencies do not apply: the
Α-form cannot replace the Ε-form in this case.
11.4 Discussion
In the previous sections I have shown that there are certain environments that
obligatorily require one of the three possible person inflection types. This is a
convenient aspect for linguistic description, as the occurrence of forms is
predictable to a reliable extent. However, the other factors that influence the
choice of form represent much less reliable criteria, as they are mere tendencies
or preferences. In this section, these preferences will be challenged by counter
examples for each condition, which illustrates the fact that they are non-
obligatory. These may be quite atypical in some cases and "possible" in others.
Aiming at a solution, I will then approach the probability of choice for certain
forms with statistical data.
The example in (655a) shows the possible occurrence of the Α-form in
narratives. In the example, the main verb follows a participle clause. The use of
the Α-form is atypical, as complex syntactic structures, especially in narratives,
usually coincide with the Ε-form. This illustrates the potential for variation
between the two forms in non-obligatory contexts. In (655b), the occurrence of
the Α-form in the context of complex syntactic structures is further exemplified,
here with the finite verb occurring before a dependent clause. However, other
aspects, such as the fact that (655b) is from a conversation, might be relevant
for the choice of form in this example. This confirms that the choice of the E-
form in complex syntactic environments, such as illustrated in (647), is a mere
preference that does not exclude variation.
Similarly, the Ε-form can be found in contexts that do not match the preferences
as indicated in (636). The sentences in (656) illustrate uncommon occurrences
of the Ε-form. (656a) shows the use of this form in short utterances, as part of a
narrative. In (656b), the Ε-form occurs in a conversation, which is in opposition
to the style used in narratives, and in (656c), a 3ps negative form is observed
with the Ε-form. This particular example illustrates that the preference "A-form
with 3ps negated verbs" is violable.
a) In short utterances:
le=sahi ke hoara-ü
one-time VLI see-lsg/E
'Once I experienced it.' [from narrative: hunting story]
b) In non-narrative genres:
eresi nii ora ke tQu hjä ajto-re-u=ni
tomorrow that hour VLI CRTN just say-IRR-lsg/E=ASS
Ί will tell tomorrow just at that time.' [from conversation]
The examples shown above demonstrate that the preferences stated in (636) are
subject to exceptions. However, in order to further support the actual weight of
those preferences, I represent these preferences in terms of statistical
distribution. 54 Verb forms from ten selected texts of different speakers and
genres were counted in order to determine the relevance of the suggested
criteria that influence the choice of person inflection form. The overview in
(657) provides information on the following aspects:
1. 283 (=58%) of all inflected forms occurred in predictable contexts. Most
typically, this was through the presence of a focus marker, in dependent
clause or in questions and imperatives. The rest of 205 verbs were subject to
choice by preference, according to the optional conditions discussed above. 55
This also includes instances of 2ps or lpl occurrence, as these forms are not
distinguished in the different person inflection classes.
2. In narratives told by three different speakers, there is a preference for E-
forms (33 instances) as opposed to A-forms (22 examples). Details regarding
the nature of the contexts in which the Α-forms occurred will be investigated
below.
3. Inflected verbs used in conversation exhibited an overwhelming prevalence
for Α-forms, which is in agreement with the predictions made above.
4. Picture descriptions do not belong to the narrative genre, even though the
nature of speech in this case involves 'telling', but not from the speaker's
own experience (or through hearsay). This is manifested by the distribution
of person inflection types in Descriptions 1-6, told by two different speakers
(details discussed below). In these texts, only one instance of an Ε-form was
recorded, as opposed to 52 occurrences of Α-forms. Description 7 was
subject to other influences, as will be discussed below.
54
Note that these figures are based on a small selection of representative texts only.
However, it is plausible to assume that 3 total of 488 inflected verbs constitute a
sound basis in order to illustrate the general tendencies.
55
The addition of forms does not always match the total ("62+4"), as there were four
cases in which an Α-form was incorrectly used in a context that required the E-form,
i.e. one speaker in a conversation used the Α-form despite the presence of a focus
marker in the same sentence. See (1) for details.
Text 13, surprisingly contained more instances of the Α-form as opposed to the
Ε-form, which would have been expected to occur more frequently, since this
text represents the narrative genre. However, all occurrences of the Α-form are
found in preferred contexts for the Α-form, most frequently with 3ps negatives.
The majority of those found with negatives also co-occurred with complex
syntactic structures, which explains the high figures here. However, the general
style of the narrative is exhibited by the predominant use of the Ε-form in other
contexts that are not subject to any preference criteria.
Predictable/Total: 26/46
Rest: 20
Person inflection type chosen on Rest:
All Short NEG:3ps Complex Other
A-forms: 12 0 9 9 0
E-forms: 8 0 0 8 0
Texts 11 and 12 (cf. (657)), which are narratives told by another speaker, are
not conclusive, as in each text, all verb forms but one occurred in predictable
contexts, i.e. with a focus marker or in dependent clause. In both cases, the story
was finished by a "short" statement containing the Α-form to indicate the end.
Text 16, again told by another speaker, contained less predictable contexts
and is a rich source of contexts for which a preference for one of the two person
inflection types had to be made. The majority of verb forms occurred in the E-
form, most of which have complex syntactic structures. It must be noted that the
presence of subordinate clauses and other dependent clause types are a typical
feature for narratives in general; thus, the predominance of Ε-forms is not
surprising. Α-forms, however, did not occur in this specific context. Most of the
Α-forms attested in this text occurred in short utterances - typically representing
citations of speaker interaction, which are part of the story.
number of verb forms occurred in short statements, such as Ί will do it' and Ί
did not understand you'. In addition to the fact that the Α-form is typical in
conversations, it also occurred frequently with complex syntactic environments.
This aspect indicates that non-narrative style is a more relevant feature than the
preference for the Ε-form with complex structures. However, this was the
context in which most occurrences of this form were attested. One may
conclude from this, if Ε-forms occur in non-narrative texts, they preferably do
so within a complex syntactic environment.
Another set of texts is represented by picture descriptions. The data from two
different speakers was selected for statistical analysis here. The texts
T35A+B/T36A+B each involve five little texts based on the description of five
images that showed situations of daily life for the Urarina, which included
hunting, cooking, and house building. The verb count exhibits an overwhelming
predominance of the Α-form, with only one Ε-form occurring in 51 inflected
verbs (in non-predictable contexts) altogether.
As shown in (661a), both speakers have a strong preference for short utterances
that described the various actions depicted in the images. In many cases, the
utterance involved a verb preceded by an object or followed by a subject, i.e.
with only one NP being present. In other examples, the sentences contained
more than one NP, but were still significantly shorter than typical sentences
occurring in narratives (cf. (661b)). However, having defined the criterion
"short" as "Verb plus one constituent or adverbial", these examples are
classified as "Other". For one speaker (JN), this applied to all given examples,
as illustrated in (662b,c).
Texts 35C and 36C (picture description 6 by two speakers) differed from the
other images in that the task was to describe geometrical shapes. In this context,
both speakers used a focus marker in almost each example, which resulted in
the use of the Ε-form and thus is not conclusive for the analysis of preferred
forms in non-obligatory contexts. However, texts T35D and T36D (picture
description 7) exhibited interesting differences between the two speakers, as the
task was to describe about a dozen images that were part of a biblical parable
(involving a Samaritan who comes to the rescue of a man who was robbed).
While one speaker (HN) proceeded in a similar way as with the previous
images, the other (JN), switched to narrative style, as he was very familiar with
the story. This also became evident by the fact that he mentioned aspects in his
description that were not depicted in the images (e.g. names). Different from the
previous picture description, his speech involved more complex syntactic
constructions, which corresponds to the complexity of the given images. This
probably contributed to the ample use of the Ε-form, while no occurrences of
the Α-form were recorded. The first speaker (cf. (663a)) also used more
complex structures, but tried to stick to the task of description, which resulted in
the use of the Α-form even in most syntactically complex environments.
From these observations, it can be stated that the Ε-form is the functionally
more marked person inflection type, as it only occurs in one specific genre,
which overlaps with the other typical environment where it is used, in complex
syntactic structures. However, its preference is easily overridden by other
factors that imply a preference for the Α-form, such as 3ps negation, utterance
length, and embedding of non-narrative style. The Α-form is functionally less
marked and can therefore be characterised as the default form.
11.5 Conclusion
Each Urarina verb can occur in three different forms that may be called person
inflection classes or types. The morphological differences between these classes
are manifested by separate sets of person markers for each class, plus disparities
in the marking of polarity and mood. The functional distinction between the
three types is divided into obligatory conditions that pre-determine the choice of
a certain form and preferences or tendencies that apply when no obligatory
context is specified.
For each person inflection type, there is at least one obligatory context that
requires the use of a certain form, as is depicted in (664). In dependent clauses,
the finite verb is inflected with suffixes of the D-form. When a sentence
contains a focus marker, the main verb occurs in the Ε-form; this also applies to
content questions, with or without focus marker, since the presence of an
interrogative pronoun implies focus. In contrast, verbs in polar questions are
marked with the Α-form. The options that remain could be called "Declarative".
In one special case, i.e. when the introducer kwatia determines the negative
status of the clause, the Α-form is obligatory. All other contexts are subject to
optional preferences.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
454 Person inflection classes
Given this distribution of obligatory criteria, one could claim that the three
different types actually represent different clause types: similar to the
declarative, as opposed to imperatives and questions, one may characterise
dependent clauses as a clause type that require special inflection, as is common
in other languages (e.g. if compared to the subjunctive mood in Spanish or
French). As an adjustment to the previous characterisation of sentences that
contain a focus marker, one could now describe this kind of construction as a
separate clause type. Representing a further type of clause, the Ε-form is used
on the main verb whenever a focus marker is present at the beginning of the
sentence. Other clauses, including dependent clauses or quotations, may form
part of the sentence.
Utterance
Dependent Independent
clause clause
I
D
FOC Non-FOC (no overt focus marker)
Question Declarative
The main criterion for the choice of form in "Other" declarative clauses seems
to be genre. The Ε-form, i.e. the same form that marks focus constructions, is
preferred in narratives only, which at the same time represent a natural
environment for syntactically complex sentences - another criterion that favours
the occurrence of the Ε-form. The Ε-form may also occur in other genres, but
this is comparatively rare and typically related to a co-occurring complex
syntactic structure. The Α-form, in contrast, functions as a default form for
other text types. In addition, it also occurs in narratives in specific contexts.
These involve short utterances (with up to one constituent being present, apart
from the verb) and verbs that are inflected for 3ps negative. The reason for this
last preference is obscure. On the one hand, it is true that the Α-form -i is
shorter than the corresponding Ε-form -ene, which further contributes to the
Default Narrative
A, (E)
Short Long NEG:3ps
a) Suffix slots
Slot no. Function
1 Causative-1 (intr. verbs)
2 Causative-2
3 Possibility, with negation
4 Aspect: continuous (order may vary)
5 Impersonal passive; with negation
6 Aspect: habitual (order may vary)
7 Distributive (order may vary);
Plural object (order may vary)
8 Velocity (order may vary)
9 Diminutive/Counterexpectation (order may vary)
10 Aspect: completive
11 In-law talk
12 Plural-1 (order may vary)
13 Probability
14 Irrealis
15 Negation
16 Person
17 Plural-2
56
One may also say that there are only five enclitic slots, since the last two contain
clause clitics. However, as their most typical occurrence is on a verb, they will be
discussed in this chapter.
b) Enclitic slots
18 Politeness
19 Assertive (Future)
20 Evidentiality: Witness
21 Evidentiality: Reportative (order may vary);
Remoteness (past) (order may vary)
22 Reassurance
23 Interrogative; Negative question
24 Attitude/Emotion: Emphasis, Frustrative, Warning, Fear;
Rhetorical question
Natural speech does not provide examples in which all 24 suffix/clitic slots
listed in (666) would occur in a row; however, apart from some exceptions,
their combination would be possible at least theoretically. On average, only
between two and four positions are filled. In (667a), an example for a typical
verb structure is given. The second example (667b), where the root is followed
by three suffixes and three enclitics, can be regarded longer than standard
length.
a)
itQa-si-uru-kaj-a
do-CPL-PL-PRB-3ps/A
'They have probably finished doing it.'
b)
su-naha-ana-i=tQe=he=ta
kill-PLO-ILT-NEG:3ps/A=PLT=REP=FRS
'It is said that he (my father-in-law) unfortunately did not kill them.' [Man talking to
woman]
For Urarina verbal suffixes, most of these criteria cannot be clearly applied. For
instance, the velocity suffix -uri (slot 8) clearly qualifies as derivational
according to criteria 1 and 4, but also matches the criteria for inflection 2 and 6.
Conversely, velocity could be a grammatical category of Urarina. In fact, the
suffix occurs with all types of verbs and speakers do not intuitively recognise it
as a "different" verb as opposed to the form without the velocity suffix. For the
other criteria, any attempt to unmistakably separate derivation and inflection is
relative, as is the case for many polysynthetic languages. The causative suffix -a
could be regarded as "derivational" in that it results in new lexical items (e.g.
'come' + CAU results into 'bring'). However, its function being clearly of a
grammatical nature suggests that it could be described as "inflectional".
Thus, as a precise distinction between derivation and inflection is not always
practicable in Urarina, the division as suggested in this grammar ought not to be
taken as dogmatic. All morphemes investigated in this chapter have the
following properties in common:
1. They are not word class changing.
2. They are very productive, i.e. they can be combined with any verb or with
almost all members of a certain verb class. (For instance, it is obvious that a
plural object marker only occurs with transitive verbs.)
3. They are easily compatible with suffixes of other grammatical categories; i.e.
it is possible to assign a morpheme to a specific slot. In particular, all
morphemes discussed here can be combined with a person marking suffix.
Note that I have not included here size suffixes and other morphemes branded
"derivational" as discussed in §10, as they are not easily compatible with
Urarina has only one position that occurs before the verb root. This slot can be
occupied by one of the two following forms, which are mutually exclusive:
a) The general intransitivising prefix ne-, which must be considered derivational
(cf. §9.3), or
b) An object proclitic for lsg or 2sg (3ps is unmarked; other forms are marked
through free pronouns where applicable - cf. §5.5).
Since neither of the two morphemes above is part of the inflectional system, it
can be stated that Urarina has a purely suffixing inflectional morphology. Note
that there are a few rare prefixes in the language, but they do not mark verbal
inflection. These include the associative marker hi- on nouns, (which appears to
be highly lexicalised, cf. §7.3.3), and, similarly, the even less productive prefix
b-, also found with a few nouns only (cf. §7.3.2).
The position closest to the root can be filled by the causative suffix -a, which
occurs with intransitive verbs only. It occupies a separate slot as is evident from
the fact that it can be combined with the other causative marker (cf. §12.2.2).
The details of the exact function and allomorphy for both causative suffixes are
discussed in §16.4.
b)
tgäe kanaanaj-uru eno-a-e=lu
also child-PL enter-CAUl-3ps/E=REM
'He also made the children enter.'
The suffix -erate occurs with intransitive as well as with transitive verbs. The
examples in (669) show the use of -erate as attached to the root, which is its
most common position. It can be followed by suffixes of all other slots. Below,
its occurrence is illustrated before suffixes such as for habitual aspect and plural
object. 57
a)
akauru ke itulere itQa-rate
3pl VLI all.kinds do-CAU2:3ps/E
'He made them do all kinds of things.'
b)
mi hau=te kujßadera-Ί ari-t$ate
that because=FOC be.worried-PRT seek-CAU2:3ps
'Therefore, he was worried and had her sought.'
The examples in (670) illustrate that both causative suffixes can occur in
combination (and therefore occupy separate slots). The first example represents
a causativisation of the intransitive verb for 'enter', whose valency is increased
through the addition of -a. Then, in turn, it is suffixed with -erate, which results
in the meaning 'cause to make enter'. In (670b), the -a causative is attached to
the root / k u / 'drink', resulting in the irregular form ku-hvaa 'give to drink',
which in turn is followed by -erate. The semantic content of this form is a
double causative 'cause to give to drink'.
57
There is one example in the NT where the plural object marker precedes the
causative: te-naha-erate ('give'-PLO-CAU2:3ps/E) 'he had them delivered' (NT:
Acts 1:2). This is due to the variability in position of the PLO suffix.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Suffixal positions 461
a)
fwedoro eno-a-erate karesero kuane herodesi
PSN enter-CAU 1 -CAU2:3ps/E prison inside PSN
'Herod had Peter thrown into prison.' [NT: Acts 12:4]
b)
bahaae+bahaae-rattru ere+ere-nakauru ku-kwaa-erate-ma
RED+ask-those.who RED-speak-those.who drink-CAUl-CAU2-INF
najpe-re=l kana+kioaaun-era
be.able-IRR:3ps/E=ASS our.creator
'God will be able to have [someone] give drink to those who cry to him day and night.'
[NT: Luke 18:7]
a)
su-naka-reheto-oru-i
kill-PSB-HAB 1 -PL-NEG:3ps/A
'They used to be hard to kill.' [Lit. "not easily killable"]
b)
sw-erate-mka-i
kill-CAU2-PSB-NEG:3ps/A
'It is difficult to find someone who would kill it.' [Lit. "not easily make-kill-able"]
The suffix can also occur with the velocity suffix -uri, as illustrated in (673).
The combination of this marker with the continuous form in (673) may be
surprising at first sight, since durativity and rapidity do not appear to be
semantically compatible. The form refers to a situation where the protagonist
was still listening and suddenly died.
u-e
die-3ps/E
'Hearing [these words], he immediately fell down and died.' [Lit. 'after he quickly
heard it'; NT: Acts 5:5]
The continuous form in combination with the participle is also rather frequent in
adverbials. Interestingly, the durative meaning of the suffix tends to be
lexicalised in this context. For instance, the word rauto-hwe-ι ('be calm'-CNT-
PRT) 'calm(ly)' always contains a continuous form even though no reference to
aspect may apply. In fact, it is not uncommon to find the same verb with and
without -ahe within the same sentence, with the same meaning. This is
exemplified in (675), where the priest's assistant provides the people with
fishing equipment: in this example, 'give' is marked for continuous aspect once,
while the other occurrence remains unmarked. The "optionality" of the suffix
depends on the context as there is no fixed rule that would state that it has to
appear once per clause, for instance.
O n e might wonder why the two suffixes -ahe (continuous) and -reheto (habitual;
cf. §12.2.6) are occupying separate morphological slots, despite the fact that
they both mark aspect. The reason for this is that there are a f e w examples, in
which -ahe co-occurs with -reheto, directly preceding it, as illustrated here:
a)
obana su-ahe-reheto-a
cl.peccary kill-CNT-HABl-3ps/A
'He used to be killing collared peccaries.'
b)
satii ririanaj hetau=te raj suuha-atQa kuane huara-he-rehete=lu
all 'all.that' HRS=FOCPOSS heart-only inside see-CNT-HABl:3ps/E=REM
raj neba
POSS mother
'His mother used to keep everything [he said] in her heart.' [NT: Luke 2:51 ]
The impersonal suffix marker -era can be attached to any transitive verb stem,
including those that represent causativised intransitive verbs such u-a 'bring'
("make come") and verbs with the causative suffix -erate. However, the
occurrence of the impersonal passive is infrequent and the information available
on its use is limited. In the database it is only attested in a few examples such as
illustrated in (677). In all examples, it occurs with the negative form, to imply
'nobody'.
In fact, forms other than the 3ps negative (-erai) only occurred in elicitation, as
well as combinations with aspect and tense markers. In elicitation, affirmative
forms such as sw-era-a ('kill'-IMPS-3ps/A) 'it was killed' were also confirmed
as correct but these examples are not attested in actual examples from texts.
The suffixes -reheto and -nahaaoka refer to habitual action. The distinction
between the two is with regard to ongoing vs. completed actions or events. The
suffix -reheto is almost always related to past tense, where it describes a habit
that is not current any more. Thus, one may speak of a "completed habit" here.
The only complication is that this form also can be used with the future tense
(based on elicitation only), where the "completed" meaning becomes less
transparent, implying a meaning such as 'he will be doing it'. When used with
past reference, other elements such as the remoteness marker =lu or a temporal
conjunction (e.g. bana 'at the time when') frequently (but optionally) co-occur
with this form. Alternatively, a reference to the past can be made by an adverb,
or it is evident from the context.
The final vowel of the imperfective suffix is /u/ underlyingly (but preferably
pronounced as [o] after /t/). However, this vowel is elided when certain suffixes
follow. In particular, this is the case with the 3ps/E suffix -e: as observed in
(678c), the form for HABl:3ps/E is realised as -rehete (but underlyingly would
be -reheto-e). The vowel lol in -reheto is also elided before the negative suffix
-ene (or variants), and it is realised as [e] before the plural suffix -kuru (or
variants), and, as illustrated below. Note that this alternation is not a general
morphological rule, but it also applies to two more forms that end in /to/: ajto-a
-> ajt-e ('say'-3ps/E) and the intensifying suffix -toa which is realised as -te in
the 3ps/E form. Other verbs such as bito-a 'pass' do not follow this rule: the
3ps/E form of bito-a is bito-e.
The alternation by which the final /o/ of the habitual suffix is absorbed when -e
or -ene follow is not a general rule extendable to all suffixes that begin with /e/
and follow the habitual: in fact, the negative suffix -e in te-reheto-e-i-tg,e=lu
('give'-HABl-NEG-2ps-PL=REM) 'you did not use to give it' does not have
any impact on the final vowel of the habitual.
Again, the occurrence of -reheto is comparatively infrequent. Therefore, the
fact that it is rarely attested in combination with suffixes from other
morphological slots could be coincidental. For instance, there are no examples
in which -reheto would be followed by any markers for aktionsart or by a
participle suffix.
The habitual suffix -mhaaoka cannot be combined with -reheto. It refers to
regularly repeated actions or events that have not been completed or ceased.
Thus, a past reference can be given, but it is implied that the action or event is
still current and likely to be repeated again. Different from -reheto, the suffix
-mhaaoka is not compatible with the future tense.
a)
kafiue ha-nahaaoka hwäa
coffee make-HAB2:3ps/A PSN
'Juan always makes his coffee.'
b)
raana su-nahaaoka
w.l.peccary kill-HAB2:3ps/A
'He always kills white-lipped peccaries' [About every four to five months]
manifested by the merging of the consonant /k/ with some of the personal and
negative suffixes. For negated lpl/E forms, there are variants.
The two suffixes that occupy this position represent a "zone" rather than a set of
mutually exclusive set of suffixes: the distributive suffix -ahva (and variants)
and the plural object marker -naha (with variant -βaha after /i/). The function
and distribution of both suffixes is discussed in §8 on number marking and will
only be summarised here. The plural object marker occurs under the following
circumstances:
1. When the object is human and refers to 3pl, and
2. when the object does not surface as a noun or pronoun.
3. With transitive verbs only.
The conditions for the occurrence of the distributive marker -ahva are similar
and can be described as follows (also cf. §8.5). It is used
1. with reference to human participants only, and
2. when the object does not surface as a noun or pronoun (with transitive verbs).
3. Different from -naha, -ahoa occurs with transitive and intransitive verbs.
A peculiarity is that the presence of one of these suffixes does not automatically
exclude the other. Both suffixes can occur adjacent to each other - and in
variable order. This makes it difficult to assign each suffix to a separate slot,
since the order cannot be determined. Examples for this are given in (685). In
(685a), the distributive marker precedes the plural object suffix, and in (685b),
the reverse order applies.
In addition to the variable order of -ahva and -naha, these can also change
position with regard to other suffixal slots. As illustrated in (686), -naha may
precede the habitual suffix (slot 6).
eene-kuru
woman-PL
Ί used to send to prison all, men and women.' [NT: Acts 22:4]
In another type of variation, the suffixes of zone 7 can follow suffixes of slot 8
or 9 (cf. (687)).
a)
itQa-hee-hahoa-a
do-DIM-DSTR-3ps/A
'He [a weak person] made one by one.'
b)
su-uri-hje-hahoa-a
kill-RAP-CNT-DSTR-3ps/A
'He is rapidly killing one by one.'
As seen in the example in (687), -ahva has an allomorph -hakwa, which occurs
after verbal roots that end with the vowel /a/. Note that the first example in
(688) exhibits the opposite order compared to (685b). Below, the suffix is
realised as -hahoa, since it directly follows the root, whereas in (685), it
surfaces as -akwa, following the plural object suffix.
As is evident from the examples in (687), the insertion of /h/ to form -hakzua is
not restricted to the occurrence of the distributive suffix after verbal roots. For
instance, in (687a), /h/ is inserted after the diminutive suffix -hee and in (687b)
it occurs after the continuous suffix -ahe. Recall that under normal conditions,
any sequence of /e/ followed by /a/ (such as the final vowel of -ahe or -hee)
would be realised as /i.a/ (cf. §2.8.4). The two suffixes seen here appear to be
resistant against this phonological change, and in order to avoid the illicit
sequence fe.af, a glottal fricative /h/ is inserted. However, recall that this is not a
general phonological rule, but restricted to the morpheme -ahva. A similar
situation applies to verbs whose roots end in /a/, as mentioned above: /h/ is
inserted here in a dissimilatory function, in order to make the morpheme
boundary more transparent. The situation is further complicated as the number
of syllables of a verbal root also seems to play a role: after disyllabic roots such
as ama-a 'take along', ari-a 'seek', or huhi-a 'stab', the distributive is realised
as -ahva. After most trisyllabic roots, such as asihjau-a 'steal', itQua-ka 'tie',
and kureti-a 'buy', the allomorph -hahua is chosen. However, there are a
number of exceptions to this regularity, as also some disyllabic verbal roots take
the variant -hahva. These include hoara-a 'see' and bajti-a 'forget';
conversely, a few trisyllabic roots occur with -ahva, such as koituku-a 'know'
and kunajti-a 'be sick'. As the exact conditions for the distribution of the two
allomorphs remain obscure, one has to assume that there are quite a number of
exceptions from the tendencies described above. Also note that for some verbs
(e.g. kajfla-a 'return'), both variants are acceptable.
It should also be mentioned that there is an ordering irregularity between the
causative -erate and the PLO suffix -naha. There are several examples where
PLO precedes the causative even though the former normally occupies slot 2.
The form sw-erate-naha-a ('kiir-CAU2-PLO-3ps/A) 'he has them killed' is
equally acceptable as the variant su-naha-erati-a ('kill'-PLO-CAU2-3ps/A).
The velocity suffix -uri (and allomorphs), which occurs in this position refers to
rapid speed, but may also have other functions, such as diminutive or politeness
(cf. §13.4.1). The interpretation of its semantics depends on the context. In
(689), its use clearly suggests a reference to speed.
a)
aresipe muku-uri-1, enamhja kuane hau-to-a=ne ahariri
mojara.fitsh catch-RAP-PRT canoe inside throw-INTS-3ps/D gamitana.fish
ne-1 nerutu-e
be-PRT tum.into-3ps/E
'He quickly caught a mojara fish and when he threw it into the canoe, it turned into a
gamitana fish.'
b)
ku kuru-ri-1, naboaaunei hoajte-u=ra, na-a hau
there swallow-RAP-PRT again repeat-IMP=EMF say-3ps/D because
'He quickly swallowed it, and as he said "do it again", [he caught another fish].'
a)
basihu kuak-uri-u
a. while wait-RAP-IMP
'Please wait a little while!'
b)
ka=kulate-ri-u-toe=ra
1 sg=extend.visit-RAP-IMP-PL=EMF
'Please [still] stay with me!'
A peculiarity is that the position of -uri is variable with respect to its co-
occurrence with suffixes of slot 7 (distributive, plural object). In some
examples, -uri follows these suffixes, as illustrated below:
a)
itQa-hahoa-uri-a
do-DSTR-RAP-3ps/A
'He quickly made one by one.'
b)
itQa-hahoa-naha-uri-anu
do-DSTR-PLO-RAP-1 sg/A
Ί quickly made various one by one.'
As -uri does not occur between -ahoa and -naha, it is evident that it occupies a
separate slot. However, its position after these suffixes is not fixed, as in other
examples, it is found before -ahua and -naha. At this stage, there are no clues as
to whether this involves any semantic or pragmatic difference and will be
accepted as an arbitrary variation.
a)
itQaa-uri-ahoa-a
do-RAP-DSTR-3ps/A
'He quickly made one by one.'
b)
itQa-uri-ahoa-naha-anu
do-RAP-DSTR-PLO-1 sg/A
Ί quickly made them one by one.'
The velocity suffix has the allomorphs -ri, -uri, and -kuri, whose distribution is
determined by a complex set of factors, some of which have not been explored.
When a root ends in /«/, the velocity suffix is realised as -uri, as turu-uri-a
('arrive'-RAP-3ps/A), saru-uri-a ('push'-RAP-3ps/A), and temu-uri-a
('plant'-RAP-3ps/A) illustrate. When the root-final vowel of the verb is /e/ or
/i/, the velocity suffix is realised as -hiri in most cases, such as in here-kuri-a
('want'-RAP-3ps/A), kusi-kari-a ('bite'-RAP-3ps/A), or kurete-hiri-a ( ' b u y ' -
RAP-3ps/A). However, this rule does not account for the forms sim-uri-a
('sleep'-RAP-3ps/A), te-nri-a ('give'-RAP-3ps/A), and ere-uri-a ('speak'-RAP-
3ps/A), even though the same conditions in terms of the root-final vowel are
given.
Word length does not seem to be the relevant factor, since most verb roots
involving -hiri or -uri are disyllabic. In some cases, the velocity suffix surfaces
as -ri, with some variation. For instance, 'he made it quickly' can surface as
itQa-ri-a or itQa-kuri-a. Apart from this variation, the form -ri occurs with most
verbs whose root ends in a vowel sequence. Examples for this are lurua-ri-a
('lay'-RAP-3ps/A), aua-ri-u-tge ('hear'-RAP-IMP-PL), or naurutaae-ri-u=ra
('displace'-RAP-IMP=EMF), but there are counterexamples (e.g. ubaae-kuri-a
('be angry'-RAP-3ps/A).
The alternations of the velocity suffix are summarised in (693). Including all
exceptions, the distribution of allomorphs is so complex that it is hard to make
out a systematic rule at this point. The only alternation that is 100% predictable
is the realisation of the morpheme as -uri after /«/, and some regularities as
mentioned above.
The form -hee can refer to 'something or someone small or w e a k ' , as illustrated
in (694a). The diminutive function usually refers to the subject of the clause,
but, depending on the context, may also be understood as assigning diminutive
function to the core a meaning of the verb (i.e. 'a little'). In other examples, the
use of -hee here implies surprise about the fact that the person w h o performed
the action is able to do it despite his/her weakness. The reference to
counterexpectation is also expressed in (694b), which implies that the happy
person was expected to be sad. Alternatively (depending on the context), (694b)
can mean that the person is "a little happy", i.e. the form can have direct
diminutive function. While one could hypothesise that diminutive and
counterexpectation are homonyms, there is a relation between the t w o
functions: The "surprise" component of -hee is indeed based on the fact that the
agent has characteristics which imply a diminutive interpretation. For instance,
the examples in (694) have the connotation that the agent is indeed small or
weak (or sad, as for (694b)).
a)
itQa-hee-ka
do-DIM-3ps/A
'He (surprisingly) did it.' [Talking of a child or old person, thinking that he would be
too weak to do it.]
b)
kuruae-hee-ka
be.happy-DIM-3ps/A
'He is (unexpectedly) happy.'
With the verb lama 'be missing', the diminutive as in lana-hee-ka 'a little is
missing' (to imply Ί n e e d ' ) is used with a politeness connotation, suggesting
that the listener is expected to help. Example (696a) illustrates the polite
function of -hee with lanaa, implying that a little firewood would be enough in
order to account for the need.
Despite the polite use of -hee with lanaa, the purely diminutive function may
also be implied with this verb; the variation is only evident from the context. In
(697a), -hee is used as the woman in this narrative almost perfectly complied
with what she was told and missed out only one last task.
The variation in meaning of the suffix -hee can be summarised by the following
functions:
- Counterexpectation
- " W e a k " agent
- "A little" (object reference)
- Politeness
(698) Diminutive -hee following RAP suffix -uri, but preceding slot 7 suffixes
(elicited)
a)
su-uri-hjee-mha-a
kill-RAP-DIM-PLO-3ps/A
'He (a weak/small person) killed them quickly.'
b)
su-uri-hjee-hahua-a
kill-RAP-DIM-DSTR-3ps/A
'He (a weak/small person) quickly killed one by one.'
A s a variation, some verbs can take -hee or /-[V]he/ alternatively. The rules for
the assignment of the respective allomorph are again inconclusive. The table in
(700) summarises the possible combinations.
The suffix -si refers to completive aspect and often has an additional
connotation of "achievement". In the examples in (701), -si refers to an action
or event that occurred "before" or "previously", in relation to the time of
reference.
a)
najßa-si-anu=w hana=te turu-e
finish-CPL-1 sg/D=SUB when=FOC arrive-3ps/E
'He arrived when I had already finished it.' [Lit. 'When I had finished it before, he
arrived.']
b)
dosmildos ke turu-si-a=ne ahinia, hestjona-anu rajtene
2002 INST arrive-CPL-3ps/D=SUB before direct-lps/D must
Ί must direct it before the year 2002 arrives.'
The sentence in (701b) refers to an event that will have taken place in the future,
i.e. will be past only then. However, future tense is not marked. Instead, the
word ahinia 'before' (otherwise used as a postposition) functions as a
conjunction after the subordinate marker =ne. However, the completive is not
attested in co-occurrence with the irrealis to mark future tense. The
interpretation as "achievement" is particularly strong in combination with
negative forms. The examples in (702) show the use of -si with negative
suffixes. Note that the completive is not compatible with any aspect markers
such as continuous or habitual.
a)
βadera-ure temu-si-m-a mi aheri+ko-teru aari ke=ne
be.sad-3pl/E cut-CPL-NEG-3ps/D that stone+ASC-axe topa.tree VLI=SUB
häu
because
'They were sad because their stone axe could not cut the topa tree.'
b)
muku-si-ße kanakaana katai=tga
catch-CPL-NEG:3ps/E lpl/ex hook=EMF
'Our fishing hook did not catch [the fish].'
The Urarina system for politeness involves one form that is used in order to
refer to certain in-laws and a few other persons when referring to them (but not
when talking directly to them; cf. §13.3, where the exact conditions of use are
investigated). For instance, a male person talking about his son-in-law or father-
in-law uses this form, which is expressed as a verbal suffix -ana (and allomorph
-nana). The origin of this suffix is easy to trace, as 'father-in-law' is kaana and
'son-in-law' means nakana, which both have phonological similarity to the
suffix. The examples in (703) illustrate the position of -ana following suffixes
that occur earlier in the linear order.
a) After root:
mhjauria tgae kati saate-nana-a=ne
don't also black.monkey kill.by.blowgun-ILT-Sps/A^NEGF
'He (the godfather) also ought not to kill black monkeys!'
The position of -uru is variable to a certain degree, as it can occur before the
habitual suffix -reheto (slot 6), as a variation (cf. §12.2.6). Thus, both forms for
'they used to live', as illustrated in (705), are possible (with no apparent
difference in meaning). These examples are confirmed by a number of examples
in the N T translation (not listed here), where both suffix orders occur in free
variation. Remarkable is the (unexplained) repetition of the plural suffix in
(705b), where a form of -uru occurs before and after the habitual suffix.
a)
itg,au-ru-rehete=lu / itQau-rehete-kure=lu
live-PL-HAB 1:3ps/E=REM Iive-HAB 1 -3pl/E=REM
'They used to live'
b)
ku akauru ajßa karahal ne-ure-rehete-kure=lu
there 3pl with long.time be-PL-HABl-3pl/E=REM
'They used to stay with them for a long time.'
coincidence as all sentences displayed here are taken from texts that involve the
traditional language.
a) After PL:
heriane edaae-kuru-kaj-a=ra
probably be.shy-PL-PRB-3ps/A=EMF
'They must be shy.' [About people who seem to have disappeared]
b) After RAP:
hirikuri=te ... heriane ra-uri-kaj-a=ra
PSN=FOC probably receive-RAP-PRB-3ps/A=EMF
'Hirikuri quickly must have taken it.' [Suspecting a spirit of theft]
c) With copula:
d$=asi+hatGu kuane=te=ra heriane ne-kaj-a=ra
2sg-nose+hole inside=FOC=EMF probably be-PRB-3ps/A=EMF
'Certainly it must be in your nose.' [Again suspecting spirit of stealing]
A morphological peculiarity is that the person suffix for 3ps, which follows -kaj
is always -a, including the Ε-form, which would normally result in -e, i.e. the
expected 3ps/E form -kaj-0 or -kaj-e does not exist (cf. (706b)). With other
person suffixes, no restrictions apply. However, when -kaj is followed by the
2ps suffix -i, the form is realised as -ka-i [-kaai], as illustrated in example (707).
ii=te it Qa-ka-i
2sg=FOC do-PRB-2ps
'You must have done it.'
Urarina does not have any formal marking explicitly used for tense. For
instance, the remoteness marker =lu is usually used with past reference, but it
can also refer to remote future when used with some words (as in
jioae=lu netohwei 'forever' (cf. §5.7.3). There also is no suffix that would mark
future tense on its own. Instead, future tense is a construct of the irrealis marker
-ri (and allomorph -re) and the assertive enclitic =ni, which is added in slot 18
(cf. §12.3.2). Without this clitic, the form is understood as irrealis. While -ri can
b)
ruru-te najpe-re kuraanaa m-a=ne=ra
howler. monkey=FOC be.able-IRR:3ps/E chief be-3ps/D=CND=EMF
'The howler monkey would be able, if he were the chief.'
Note that with the irrealis reading, mood is only marked on the main verb, but
not on the verb of a subordinate clause, as illustrated in (708b). In fact, the
irrealis marker is the only verbal suffix that does not normally occur in
dependent clauses, except in elicitation (cf. §20.1.1.3). The sentences in (709)
show the interpretation as future tense when -ri occurs in combination with the
assertive enclitic.
(709) Irrealis suffix -ri plus assertive marker for future reference
a)
kaa d^aura+atane itahe-ri-tQäu=ni=tQa
this flesh+land destroy-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS=EMF
Ί will destroy this earth.'
b)
kwitu1oi-erate-re-ü=m
know-CAU2-IRR-1 sg/E=ASS
Ί will let him know.'
Elsewhere, the irrealis suffix surfaces as -re, which makes it possible to assume
-re as the underlying form. Alternatively, (as implied here) one could assume
that -ri is the underlying form and describe the occurrence of -re as occurring
only in the forms for lsg/E, 3pl/E, and in 2ps/D. A s -ri is the allomorph with a
wider distribution, I will refer to this form as the underlying morpheme.
In addition to the changes of the suffix -ri, the shape of the person markers that
follow the irrealis is subject to alternation:
- When the irrealis is realised as -ri, a following /kJ should change to [t$], but
it does not in this context, instead, 2ps forms surface as -ki.
- The lsg/A form is irregular.
- In the lpl forms, the A conjugation is distinct from the other conjugations,
while otherwise A- and D-conjugations coincide (i.e. in the declarative
mood).
- In the 3ps/E form, /e/ merges with the irrealis suffix.
Further alternations apply when the irrealis is combined with a negative suffix.
In the Α-conjugation, -ri is followed by the negative marker, which varies
between -e and -a, depending on person (also cf. the following §12.2.15). In the
lsg/A, and 3ps/A form, the negative -a is realised as -βa, for which there is
good reason: when the affirmative form follows the irrealis, it is realised with
[tp], e.g. ne-ri-tQa=i ( ' b e ' - I R R - 3 p s / A = A S S ' h e will be'). The palatal nasal that
precedes the negative in this particular context is inserted for dissimilatory
purpose. This happens in a similar way with the negative irrealis form for
3ps/A, which is -ri-ßa-i, as opposed to the affirmative form -ri-tQa. The 2sg/A
is variable with regard to the negative marker, as it can surface as -a or -e. In all
other forms, negation is marked by -ene (or -ne with 3pl/E,D).
The realisation of irrealis and negative in the other conjugations follow
similar morpho-phonological alternations as the ones observed in the
affirmative irrealis. However, the order between the two suffixes is reversed,
i.e. negation precedes the irrealis rather than following it.
Urarina has several negative suffixes, which are used with regard to person,
conjugation class, and other factors, as depicted in the paradigm for person and
polarity marking in (712). Since the different negative markers all fulfil the
same function, I consider them as projections of one morpheme, even though
they have quite different forms. While it is not possible to identify one
particular suffix as "underlying", the different forms can be understood as
allomorphs of each other.
The regularities for the distribution of the respective negative markers can be
summarised in the following way:
- With all Ε-forms and D-forms of the verb, the negative suffix is -ene (or -era
before /a/). In contrast, Α-forms are subject to a further division.
- With all lps/A forms, the negative suffix is -a.
- With all 2ps/A forms, the negative suffix is -e.
- With all 3ps/A forms, the negative suffix is -i.
The last peculiarity listed above (regarding -i) occurs in the negative marking
for 3ps forms: in this context, the negative suffix -i and the person suffix are
fused, i.e. the form is realised as -i. For 3ps/A, the expected person suffix -a is
elided, while in the Ε-form, the 3ps/E suffix -e is elided. In the D-form, such
elision does not take place: -a regularly occurs as a person marker. However,
there is a variant for NEG:3ps/A, which consists of the negative marker -e
followed by -i. I suspect that this might be the underlying form, which can be
simplified to -ji in the following way: the suffix sequence -e-i is realised with
hiatus after a vowel-final verb stem (i.e. [jei]), from which the form [ji] can be
interpreted as a simplification. A matter of concern might be whether -i in the
3pl/A form -uru-i functions as a person marker or a negative suffix. If we
assume that -i functions as a person marker for negative 3sg/A, we may
conclude that the corresponding 3pl form -uru-i is a simplification of the (non-
existent) form -uru-e-i.
In addition to these paradigmatic regularities, a few morpho-phonological
rules apply. In particular, a glottal stop is inserted in certain contexts. For
example, the negative suffix -a for lps/A is realised as -?a after some verbal
roots that end with /a/. In a similar way, it is -?e for the negation of 2sg (cf.
(713c)).
(713) Negative allomorphs with glottal stop after roots ending in /a/
a) lsg:
eseneta-7a-ü
believe-NEG-1 sg/E
Ί don't believe it.'
b) 1 pi:
ne-betaka-7 a-aka
ITR-relax-NEG-1 pl/du
'We did not relax.'
c) 2sg:
kauatQa-1 itQa-?e-i
good-PRT do-NEG-2ps
'You did not do it well.'
The variation with the insertion of a glottal stop also occurs after verb roots that
end in a vowel sequence, such as shown in (714a). It is also observed after the
distributive suffix -ahua (cf. (714b)).
b) After suffix:
itg,a-häku>a-7 a-ü
do-DSTR-NEG-1 sg/E
Ί did not make one by one.'
After the front vowels Id and i\! the negator -i is realised as -;/. Note that the
root vowel Id is assimilated to [i] in this combination: for instance, the
underlying form of 'want', /here/ occurs as [heri] when combined with the
negator -i.
As discussed above, further alternations occur when the negative co-occurs with
the irrealis form (cf. the paradigm in (711)).
Person is the only grammatical category that is obligatorily marked on all finite
verbs. Number agreement refers to the subject of a clause of any transitivity
class. The most peculiar feature in this regard is the existence of three different
inflection classes that are related to certain syntactic conditions. The exact
occurrence of the different conjugation forms in context is discussed in §11. In
a highly simplified manner, the three classes can be characterised as follows:
1. D-class: these forms occur in dependent clause (cf. (716a).
2. Ε-class: these forms occur when a focus marker precedes the verb anywhere
in the clause (cf. (716b), or when focus or emphasis is implied in other ways.
3. Α-class: these forms occur elsewhere, particularly in short utterances (cf.
(716c)).
The occurrence of these forms is illustrated in (716). It should be noted that the
distribution of these different forms does not depend on particular verbs (i.e. the
verbs are not divided into morphological classes in this regard): instead, the
three different forms, (which correspond to three different paradigms), may be
attached to any verb, depending on the context or other conditions.
b) E-form:
aka=te enejtQu sw-e
3sg=FOC monkey kill-3ps/E
'He [focus] killed the monkey.'
c) A-form:
enejtQu $u-a
monkey kill-3ps/A
'He killed the monkey.'
The differences become even more evident in combination with the irrealis
form, where there is a different person suffix for each person inflection class.
Each of the verbs in (717) is composed of the root for 'do', an irrealis suffix,
and a person marker for lsg, meaning Ί would do it'.
Otherwise, there is some degree of overlap for the forms for 3ps/A and 3ps/D,
i.e. the number of person suffixes is not exactly tripled by the existence of the
three different classes. This is best exemplified through the paradigm in (718),
where the three forms are contrasted for the affirmative realis mood.
Thus, the main difference lies between the forms for lsg and 3ps (singular and
plural) of the A- and Ε-classes. In fact, these terms are based on the most
common occurrence of verb forms, i.e. the 3ps/A form is -a, whereas the 3ps/E
form is -e.58
Particularly remarkable is the composition of the forms for lpl. Normally,
one would expect a hierarchy in the composition of forms for dual, inclusive
plural, and exclusive plural. In morphological terms, the dual -aka is the least
marked form. This form refers to two participants, the listener and the speaker.
The lpl inclusive form is logically built on this through the attachment of the
plural marker for 2ps. Thus, the suffix -aka-tge refers to the speaker, the listener
and an undefined group of others 'we all'. However, the most interesting form
is the one for lpl exclusive, which again has -aka as its first element, but is then
followed by the marker for lsg, to result in -aka-anu. Semantically, it refers to a
group of people, but strictly excludes the listener. Morphologically, it is the
combination of the dual with lsg, such as to "neutralise" the involvement of the
listener by the use of the lsg. The table in (719) illustrates the distinction
between first person forms in terms of (participant) features.
58
I have adopted hese terms from P. Manus (1992) who uses them in her paper on
subordination.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
490 Verbal morphology
lpl/du -aka + + —
lpl/in -aka-t^x + + +
lpl/ex -aka-anu + - +
There also is one irregularity for lpl marking occurring only in content
questions, which may be called a "desperate interrogative". In this case, a lpl
form such as -ri-tgaat$e (the combination of irrealis and lpl/in/A suffix) can be
replaced by the form -naare (or variant -naanere), as illustrated in (720). The
pragmatic differences between the two forms appear to be marginal, as the use
of -naare implies some degree of desperation, with reference to the future. The
presence of /re/ as a component of this form may thus point to the irrealis
character of the suffix (recall that an allomorph of the irrealis suffix is -re).59
Otherwise, it has the same function as the regular lpl suffixes. Interestingly, the
distinction between inclusive, exclusive, and dual forms are neutralised by
-naare and can only be indicated by the additional use of a free pronoun.
Another peculiarity is that the desperate interrogative exists only for lpl, but
cannot be used for l s g forms (for which there is no separate suffix either).
Example (720b) shows that the form can also be preceded by other suffixes,
such as the distributive -ahua.
a)
d$a itg,a-naare=ta
where sleep-DSP=FRS
'What are we going to do?' [Context: 'the work is finished, so how are we going to
continue?']
b)
d^atoanei itQa-hahva-naare
how do-DSTR-DSP
'How are we going to make each of them?' [Elicited]
The suffix also has an allomorph -naanere, but the conditions for the
distribution of the two forms are unclear, as it depends on the respective verb.
For instance, with ' g o ' , the preferred variant is ku-manere, whereas ht-naare is
less acceptable. In contrast, for ' d o ' , the preferred form is itea-naare. The
examples in (721) further illustrate that the form can be used with any
interrogative pronoun. The desperate character of a situation may also be
emphasised by particles such as the pity marker tioane or the frustrative enclitic
=ta.
a)
d$u sim-ßaanere=ta
where sleep-DSP=FRS
'Where are we going to sleep?' [Context: Arriving in the city with no place to stay]
59
However, it is not possible to attach -naa(ne)re as referring to any other person
marking than lpl. Thus, it must be assumed that /re/ is fossilised.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
492 Verbal morphology
b)
d$u noane ku-naanere
where PTY go-DSP
'Where would we go?' [Context: Arriving in the city with no place to stay]
While 3ps plural is marked by the suffix -uru (cf. §12.2.12), plural for second
person is marked by -t$e. It also functions as a plural marker for 2ps
imperatives, which confirms its function as a pluraliser for second person.
Deviating from that, -tge is also found as a component of the form for
lpl/inclusive, as mentioned above. The examples in (722) illustrate its
occurrence after person markers.
a)
d^anu-na nitoanet itQa-ki-tQe
why-INT like.that do-2ps-PL
'Why did you (PL) do it like that?'
b)
ßäe lomaj atane nitQae turu-i-tQe=ne hana
already PSN land vicinity arrive-2ps-PL=SUB when
'when you (PL) get close to the land of Lomai'
However, the status of -toe as a suffix is only confirmed in this position, i.e.
directly attached to the 2ps form. In other positions, it is also used as a
politeness-marking enclitic (cf. §12.3.1). When several persons are to be
addressed politely (e.g. several women), -t$e is marked only once, as a plural
suffix after the person marker. Thus, one may assume that the polite form has
developed from the plural marker for 2ps.
The following sections discuss further postverbal slots, with the difference that
these can be characterised as enclitics. One criterion for their distinction from
suffixes is that enclitics are typically unstressed, and that they can attach to
word classes other than verbs. While this cannot be shown for every single
clitic, the fact that the first morpheme that follows the 17 suffix slots arguably
has clitic status implies that all other elements that follow it are not verbal
suffixes (since they are not found anywhere earlier in the linear order). A more
detailed discussion of the clitic status of these morphemes is also found in
§2.11.
The morpheme =t$e was already discussed in its function as a plural marker in
§12.2.16.1. In another position, =t$e functions as a politeness-marking enclitic,
which is most typically attached to verbs. In (723), it occurs after 3ps forms,
which dispels any doubt that it could be identical with the plural marker
discussed in §12.2.16.1.
a)
ßäe=he=ra sa-a=toe
already=REP=EMF end-3ps/A=PLT
'It is already finished, he says.' [Man talking to woman]
b)
raj nakana raj, ßäe huru-a=tge bitoa, na-a=ne sajhjel
POSS father-in-law for already snap-3ps/A=PLT trap say-3ps/D=SUB although
'Even though he said "the trap has already snapped" to his father-in-law,...'
However, the occurrence of =t$e is not restricted to verbs; it can even occur on
other word classes. In (724a), it is repeated on the prohibitive introducer
nihjauria, in addition to its occurrence after the verb. Note that this example is
elicited and Urarina speakers describe the presence of as being a feature of
the traditional language, where it would imply that someone is "really polite".
The example in (724b) is taken from the NT and illustrates the occurrence of
=t$e after the participle form of an auxiliary, which itself is attached to a noun.
Also note that again, the politeness marker occurs twice, being repeated on the
main verb.
a)
mhjauria=toe itQa-i-tQe-ne
don't=PLT do-2ps=PLT=NEGF
'Don't do it!' [Singular meaning, but could be interpreted as plural without context]
b)
d^anuna hurju=ne-l=tQe=ne natu, ka=kahe akau baha-i=tge
why Jew=AUX-PRT=PLT=SUB though lsg=from water ask-2ps=PLT
'Why are you, even though being a Jew, asking water from me?' [NT: John 4:9;
Woman talking to man]
The assertive form is only found in combination with the irrealis suffix (cf.
§12.2.14) in order to mark future tense. More exactly, the assertive appears to
validate an assumption expressed through the irrealis, indicating that the
possible outcome of an event is certain or very likely to be realised. The
examples in (725) illustrate some situations in which this is implied (also cf.
(709)).
a)
ra-naa heri-ki-tQe=ne, ku=te neda-ri-)d-tQe=i=tQa
receive-INF want-2ps-PL=CND there=FOC stay-IRR-2ps-PL=ASS=EMF
'If you (PL) want to get it [the axe], you will stay there.' [Warning by the Envoy of God
about stealing axes from magnetic soil]
b)
ii auna-he-ri-tQäu=m=tQa
2sg hear-CNT-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS=EMF
Ί will be listening to you.' [Threat by monkey that any break of promise made by
woman in birth story will be known to him]
b) Negative
NEG, A-form NEG, E-form NEG, D-form
lsg -ri-ßa-ü=m -ew-re-ü=m -ene-ri-anu=l
2sg -ri-e-i=m -em-re-i-m -enc-re-i=ni
(-ri-a-i-l)
3sg -ri-jia-a=l -ene-re-i -em-ri-a=rd
lpl/du -ri-a-aka=m ~ene-n-aka=m -erte-ri-aka=m
lpl/in -ri-a-aka-tQe=l -em-ri-aka-tQe-l -ene-ri-aka-tQe=l
lpl/ex -ri-a-akaanu=l -ene-ri-akaanu=~i -ene-ri-akaam=i
2pl -ri-e-i-toe=i -ene-re-i-tg,e=l -ene-re-i-toe=i
3pl -uru-ri-ßa-a=i -uru-ne-re-l -uru-ne-ri-a=Ϊ
One can summarise that the assertive marker is realised as =rn under the
following circumstances:
- After affirmative and negative forms for 1 sg/A and 1 sg/E
- After affirmative and negative forms for 2sg/D
- After affirmative and negative forms for 3sg/D
- After affirmative and negative forms for lpl/du
- After negative form for 2sg/E and 2sg/D
Urarina has two evidential markers, which refer to witness (=ra) and reportative
(=he), respectively, and are attached to the verb as enclitics. Their use is entirely
optional, as there are alternative ways to indicate the source of information. For
instance, instead of using the witness marker =ni on a verb, one could use a
construction with a control verb, such as in Ί saw/heard that he did it'.
Similarly, the reportative =he can be substituted by a construction involving the
quotative verb naa (cf. §20.2.4.2). However, the two evidential markers are not
mutually exclusive: they occupy different positional slots. While the witness
evidential occurs in slot 20 and will be discussed here, the reportative
occupies the following slot (21). Their combination will be discussed in
§12.3.5, where also their interaction with the reassurance marker =tau is
investigated.
It should be mentioned that the use of the evidentials is not restricted to any
particular verb class, nor is it limited with respect to person marking on the
verb. An evidential can occur with I s ', 2nd, or 3rd person marking and it is also
observed with stative and posture verbs. It can be used in polar questions as
well as in content questions. However, while evidential markers may occur in
subordinate clauses, neither =ni nor =he are attested in non-finite clauses.
The witness marker =ni most commonly implies eyewitness (as in (728a)),
but the source of information can also be based on acoustic evidence, or other
senses such as smell or taste, such as illustrated in (728b,c). However, an
"inferred" reading is not implied by =m.
a) Visual:
itQa-i=m=tau
do-2ps=WIT=REAS
'You did it (earlier today).' [I know it because I was a witness]
b) Taste:
rauto-a=ni
be.tasty-3ps/A=WIT
'It was tasty.' [Referring to what I ate in the morning]
c) Hearing:
itQafiua-a=ni=tau
shoot-3ps/A=WIT=REAS
'He shot it (earlier today).' [I saw or heard him shooting]
At the same time, the witness evidential has temporal function as it refers to
"earlier today", as indicated by the glosses in (728). Apart from its occurrence
with verbs marked for 3ps, =m can also be used with other person suffixes. In
(729), = r i follows a l p s suffix: in this case, it gets assertive function, such as to
mean Ί myself am the witness that I did it'.
itQa-käu=m
do-lsg/A=WIT
Ί [really] did it.'
used with future reference. Thus, while a common origin of assertive and
witness enclitics is very likely, the homophonous markers have evolved as
different grammatical morphemes in the present.
An extended function of the temporal use of =ni can be observed with
imperative forms (cf. §15.4). Interestingly, when =m follows a verb marked for
imperative, it has temporal function, though not referring to the recent past, but
to the near future - more exactly: later on the same day. The evidential function
of =ni does not apply in this context and it can be concluded that the non-distant
future marker is a morpheme separate from the witness marker.
Another factor is that =ni, as well as the remoteness marker =lu can be
combined with the experience evidential in the reverse order to form an adverb
(or a clitic complex that is used with adverbial function): taurti and taulu are
used to mean 'as we know from earlier today' and 'as we know from (much)
earlier', respectively.
Note again that the type of experience described in the above examples varies
from case to case: in (730), the phrase was the result of a situation where the
author had shown a machete to his consultant who came back later to borrow it
(visual evidence).
The position after =ni can be filled by two enclitics with different functions, the
reportative =he and the remoteness marker =lu. Their order is variable, in that
each of them can precede or follow the other.
The reportative =he expresses the fact that the information given in a clause
is based on the witness of a third person and may thus be described as second
hand information. Note that the enclitic can also occur with verbs that are
marked for other persons as subject markers. In (731 b), the speaker states the
reported evidence of some one else about his own (the speaker's) action, using
the lsg form. A connotation of this example is that the speaker himself cannot
remember the incident.
a)
gasona u-a-ri-tQa=l-hje hioäa
fuel come-CAU 1 -IRR-3ps/A=ASS=REP PSN
'Juan says that he will bring fuel.'
b)
it$a-kau=he
do-lsg/A=REP
'He says that I did it.'
a)
sini-a=he kanaanaj
sleep-3 ps/A=REP child
'He says that the child is sleeping.'
b)
n=ukwana hana=he=te ku-e
3ps=field inside=REP=FOC go-3ps/E
'He says that he went to the field.'
In (733a) the reportative evidential co-occurs with the interrogative marker =na
in a question. Note that the position of =he with content questions is after the
interrogative pronoun (733b); also cf. §2.11). As discussed there, it also occurs
in this position in clauses with an introducer. In (733c), the occurrence of =he is
illustrated as occurring after an imperative form.
c) With imperative:
turu-ni-u=he=te hjä ii huara-kuru-mu=tQa, na-ι ajto-a hau
arrive-DSTL-IMP=FOCjust 2sg see-PL-JUSS=EMF say-PRT say-3ps/D because
hi turu-a ku-e
there arrive-NTR go-3ps/E
'As he [the novice] said, "They say <He should just arrive> so that that they can see
you", he [the priest] went there.'
In example (734a), the reportative occurs with an adverb in initial position and
is again followed by a focus marker and the emphatic marker =ra. In (734b),
=he is attached to the adverb for 'already'.
a)
eresi=he=te=ra uu-re=i
tomorrow=REP=FOC=EMF come-IRR:3ps/E=ASS
'He says he will come tomorrow.'
b)
ßäe=he=ra sa-a=tge
already=REP=EMF end-3ps/A=PLT
'He says it is finished already.' [Man talking to woman, about the fact that there is no
more fishing line to be distributed]
As briefly mentioned before (cf. §12.2.6, §12.2.14), the remoteness marker =lu
has a double function in that it may refer to the future under certain conditions.
However, the only context in which this is the case is in the adverb floaelu
'earlier'/'forever', where the interpretation depends on the situation and
a) Prehistory:
mtoanei hetau=te kaa d^aura+atane huu-hwe=lu lomaj beerte
like.that HRS=FOC this flesh+land flood-3ps/E=REM PSN female
'This is how Lomai flooded the earth (long ago).'
There is a peculiarity in the ordering of =lu and =he. The examples in (736)
illustrate their behaviour within a word: in (736a), the reportative precedes =/«,
whereas in (736b), the order is reversed, without any apparent difference in
meaning. However, the order in (736a) might be the unmarked variant, as it was
the one offered first when a hypothetical situation between the consultant and
his relatives was described.
A problem for the description of these two suffixes is that they do not occupy a
position that could be characterised as one semantic or pragmatic function,
since reportative and remoteness are two quite different features. Under
semantic considerations, the reportative would fit better into an evidential slot,
which would include the witness marker =m, but it is obvious from the example
in (737a) that they can occur in a sequence. The form in (737b) illustrates the
position of =he as following the marker for politeness (=tg,e), which was
discussed above. The order in these cases is not variable.
All other clitics (except for the remoteness marker, see above) follow the
reportative. This leads to the conclusion that those should be assigned to
separate positional slots. Further aspects regarding the reportative are discussed
in the following section.
Similar to the evidential markers =m and =he, the reassurance enclitic =tau is
highly optional and rarely occurs as a single marker on a verb. More frequently,
it co-occurs with the evidentials =m and =he. The few examples where it is
attached as a single marker are characterised as a feature of the traditional
language by native speakers. In this case, where =tau is attached to the verb
without other markers, it is interpreted as referring to reassurance and past.
Even though this does not necessarily coincide with having witnessed a
situation, the evidential connotation in these cases is very strong. Judgements on
whether the speaker of a clause with =tau must be seen as a witness are
inconsistent, but this reading specifically seems to apply to examples where
there is a controversy about the truth of a situation, e.g. to convince others of
something whose rightful source they doubt. The reassuring connotation is
again neutralised when =tau is used in combination with the remoteness marker
=lu: in this case, it has the same meaning as it has when occurring by itself (cf.
(738a) and (738c)).
a)
raana su-a=tau
w.l.peccary kill-3ps/A=REAS
'He killed a white-lipped peccary [long ago].' [Referring to the past]
b)
itQa-a=tau
do-3ps/A=REAS
c)
itQa-a=lu=tau
do-3ps/A=REM=RJEAS
'He did it.' [Referring to the past; Implying: some one is reminding me of what
happened then]
The interaction of =tau with other enclitics leads to interesting modifications of
its functions. In a similar way as with =lu, the reassuring function of =tau is
neutralised when it co-occurs with the reportative evidential =he. The particle
hetau is a lexicalised combination of the two markers, which can be
demonstrated by its syntactic properties. It functions as a hearsay marker
particularly in traditional narratives for which no specified witness is available.
The presence of =tan in this form, however, does not add any reassuring
character to it, as it solely emphasises the past character of the situation.
Examples for the occurrence of hetau are found throughout all chapters of this
grammar; an additional example is given in (739).
Interestingly, in combination with the witness marker =m, =tau loses its
temporal function and takes on reassuring function. This is illustrated in (740),
where the temporal meaning of =m as 'earlier today' has precedence over the
reference to remote past otherwise implied by =tau. In this case, the presence of
=tau has simply reassuring function. In (740), the witness function of =ni is
reinforced by the presence of =tau, especially when the speaker's statement is
opposed by the listener.
a)
na~i=ni=tau
say-2ps=WIT=REAS
'You told me.' [In reply to the question 'Where do you know it from?']
b)
itQa-si-e-i-ni-tau
do-CPL-NEG-2ps=WIT=REAS
'You did not do it.' [Implied: I have witnessed your failure]
The enclitic =tau may also be combined with the remoteness marker =lu. Its
function here is to reinforce a statement with past reference; i.e. evidentiality is
not involved. An example such as itQa-a=lu=tau (do'-3ps/A=RJEM=REAS)
implies that I "know" that he did it, without specifying the source of
information. However, combinations like this appear to be extremely rare and
are only attested in elicitation. Similar to its occurrence in tanni (cf. (730)),
=tau is also combined with =lu to form an adverb.
The table in (743) gives an overview of the enclitics that mark evidentiality or
that are related to it through combination with evidential markers. Recall that
=tau in the traditional language used to be specified as "1 st hand information",
i.e. with connotation to witness.
b) After NP:
ate taba-j=na su-i
fish be.big-NOMSbj=INT kill-2ps
'Did you kill (any) big fish?' [Unmarked variant: ate taba-j su-i=ßa?]
c) After verb:
rai kujjia kana ra-a kana+hoaaunera=ne hau huituku-akatoe=na
that so.that lpl/in receive our.creator=SUB because know-lpl/in=INT
'Do we know that God received us for that purpose?'
ne-j=te
be-NOMSbj=RHT
'Are those who are here afraid to take its blood?'
The final negative enclitic =ne is employed to mark a certain clause type that
implies negativity, i.e. a clause that requires a negative introducer of some kind
(cf. §5.10). Interestingly, the form is not compatible with negative inflection
marking on the verb. As illustrated with negative questions in (745), the verbal
inflection follows the affirmative pattern, rather than the negative paradigm.
Also note that the final negative enclitic is always attached to the last w o r d o f
the clause.
a)
ta nahari heri-a kaa d^uhuhe-j-ße
NEGQ liver want-3ps/A this stand-NOM Sbj =NEGF
'Does this one who is standing [here] not want any liver?'
b)
ta ate ra-uru-a katg,a-uru=ne=ta
NEGQ fish receive-PL3ps/A man-PL=NEGF=FRS
'Did the people not catch any fish?'
T h e final negative marker is also required after the clause introducers for
' d o n ' t ' , mhjauria and hjauipe, which both introduce a prohibitive clause (cf.
§15.2.1).
a) With mhjauria:
mhjauria be-i=jie
don't tell-2ps=NEGF
'Don't tell it!'
b) With jiaaoiße:
hjauijie hja-i kau=ne
don't urinate-2ps here=NEGF
'Don't urinate here!'
nihjauria dada-i-tQe=ne=ra
don't touch-2ps-PL=NEGF=EMF
'Don't (PL) touch him'
There are four enclitics that describe the "mood" of the speaker or the
atmosphere that relates to a situation, or which describe the emotional attitude
of the speaker. These include enclitics to express "positive" emphasis (=ra),
frustrative (=ta), warning (=naare), and fear (=naate). The analysis of their
occurrence is complex in terms of frequency and actual use: Urarina speakers
characterise the markers =ra and =ta as being part of the traditional language
only and in fact, younger speakers do not make use of them. In traditional
narratives, however, the two clitics are very frequent. In contrast, the markers
=naare and =naate are characterised as being a "normal" part of speech - but
they are infrequent.
One condition for the use of the attitudinal markers is the presence of an
actively listening participant in discourse. In descriptive texts that do not have
an interactive partner in conversation, the forms do not occur.
The morpheme =ra can be characterised as an emphatic marker, such as to
stress the relevance of what has been said, (which could adequately be
represented by an exclamation mark in most examples). Its occurrence is
extremely common in imperatives, where it emphasises the urgency of a
command. In other contexts, it may convey importance with special regard to
truthfulness and positive attitude. Most typically, it occurs in clause-final
position, where it may be attached to a verb or any other word class that
happens to be in this position. The enclitic =ra cannot co-occur with negation.
Also note that it is realised as =t$a when attached to a word that end in /i/.
a) Urgency/Seriousness:
hja-rito-anu=ra
urinate-RAP.INT-1 ps/A=EMF
Ί (really) have to urinate!'
b) Truthfulness/Positive attitude:
nekufwelato-akaanu hau aj-akaanu=ra
wonder- lpl/ex because AUX-lpl/ex=EMF
'We did it because we were wondering.' [People in response to why they are sniffing
around the priest]
c) With imperative:
amu-m-u=ra
walk-DSTL-IMP=EMF
'Go away!' [Implied: 'Get lost!']
The frustrative marker =ta can convey various kinds of negative attitudes or
emotions with respect to the mood of the speaker, in order to add an emotional
factor. "Negativity" has a fairly wide pragmatic scope here, which justifies the
term "frustrative". Similar to =ra, the enclitic is not used in the contemporary
language and its occurrences in older narratives is restricted to interactive
discourse. 60 While it frequently co-occurs with negative forms and in questions,
these contexts are not obligatory for the use of the frustrative. The range of
"negative" attitudes includes the following emotions:
- Dislike, criticising a situation
- Dissatisfaction
- Envy
- Anger
- Annoyance
- Negative expectation
- Shock
- Disbelief
- Negative surprise
- Resignation
- Disappointment
- Suspicion
This list is not exhaustive, as the use of =ta with other negative attitudes would
be possible, and some of these may exhibit a certain degree of overlap. In the
following examples, each of the emotions listed above is illustrated. Note that
the position of =ta can be described as being consistently clause-final regardless
the word class occurring at the end of a clause. This is confirmed by numerous
examples where it occurs after verbs, pronouns, or nouns.
60
Note that it is still used in the Corrientes dialect.
b) Dissatisfaction:
kauatQa-i=ta, d$a$ri=te d$a barasane ke=te
good-NEG:3ps/A=FRS how.come=FOC what dew INST=FOC
c) Envy:
nehvelaj käu, d$a kahe=te katoanei ate taba-j
envy because.of what from=FOC like.this fish be.big-NOM S bj
d) Anger:
d^anuna kanu bua basihjau-i=ta
why lsg bag steal-2ps=FRS
'Why have you stolen my bag?' [Context: Furious kinkajou talking after the spider
monkey stole his bag. He then physically attacks the thief.]
e) Annoyance:
d$aha-l=tQa, be-u=tge=ra d$asn=te katoanei ne-i-ta
come.on-PRT-EMF tell-IMP-PLT=EMF how.come=FOC like.this be-2ps=FRS
'Come on, tell, how come you behave like this?' [Context: The people are annoyed by
the woman's behaviour as she does not want to disclose essential information of how
she gave birth.]
f) Negative expectation:
mi hau ku ijiäe mihiito-oru-a hau, netQara
that because there already be.hungry-PL-3ps/D because maybe
g) Shock:
ku bane+bani-a nii itamtga hana hau, d$a ke=te
there RED+mourn-3ps/E that mud inside because what INST=FOC
h) Disbelief:
ku kanaanaj kurwae-ka hau, d$asu=te katoanei itga-i=ta
there child be.happy-3ps/D because how.come=FOC like.this do-2ps=FRS
'As he enjoyed the child like this, he asked, "How is it possible that you have done
this?'" [Context: Women used to be killed when giving birth; this is the first woman to
survive.]
i) Negative surprise:
he, ta ate ra-uru-a katQa-uru=ne=ta
hey/well NEGQ fish receive-PL-3ps/A man-PL=NEGF=FRS
'Hey, have they not caught any fish?' [Context: The priest sends the people fishing and
is surprised that they were unsuccessful.]
j) Resignation:
he, d$aka+ajjiereu=ta, na-ϊ hetau ku kahjune
hey 'why.not?'=FRS say-PRT HRS there clothing
k) Disappointment:
ajti-1 tQU kana letoa-j m-a amunaa+hoaaun-era
say-PRTCRTN lpl/in send-NOMSbjbe-3ps/A walk-NOM+create-AG
natu=ta
although=FRS
'[It happened], even though it is the Creator of ways who has sent us'. [Context: The
guide talking in disappointment about the failure of his team.]
1) Suspicion:
d$atoanei=te kuhiutt-ure katQa-uru=ta
how=FOC fish.with.hook-3pl/E man-PL-FRS
'Therefore, [the priest] said, "How have the people fished?'" [Context: Priest, getting
suspicious about the reason why the people did not catch any fish.]
The adversative or "warning" marker =naare is the third member in the class of
clitics that convey attitude. Its functions may indicate a warning, threat, or
advice. This can be in order to prevent an action intended by the addressee, or to
indicate an event that the listener does not expect. As illustrated in (750),
=naare can occur in contexts that imply future or non-future meaning, which is
evident from the context only, but not marked morphologically. In (750a), the
interpretation is future-related, the example in (750b) relates to the past, and the
one in (750c) implies present reading.
b) Past reference:
itga-ri-a=naare
do-RAP-3 ps/A=WRN
'He (unexpectedly) did it quickly.'
c) Present reference:
sini-a-he=naare
sleep-3 ps/A=REP=WRN
'[But] he says that he [his baby] is sleeping.' [Meant as a warning not to wake the baby]
a)
nuhoa raj huitgana, ra-u-tQe=naare
look.here POSS blood receive-IMP-PL=WRN
'Here is its blood, just take it!' [Said passing a bowl of peccary blood, to imply 'why
don't you go ahead and take some?']
b)
lenone-u=naare
eat-IMP=WRN
'[Please] eat!' [Meant to encourage the listener not to be shy]
a) [Context: man arrives and finds his father-in-law in a pool of blood with both eyes
scratched out by a jaguar]:
wa, d^atoane-i=t(x=naate, na-1 turu-1 hoara-a u-e
hey be.how-2ps=PLT=FEAR say-PRT arrive-PRT see-NTR come-3ps/E
raj nakana
POSS son-in-law
'His son-in-law arrived and said: "Hey, what has happened to you?'"
b) [Context: sick man does not reply, so there is fear he might be dead]:
kunajto-a=naate
be.sick-3ps/A=FEAR
'Is he sick?'
In summary, one can state that the four enclitics =ra, =ta, =naare, and =naate
occupy the same postverbal slot, all having a "mood"-related function. To some
extent, the different emotional states they describe even relate to the
grammatical system, as the morphology distinguishes grammatical categories
that correspond to the ones represented by the enclitics.
1. The emphasis marker =ra does not co-occur with negation and refers to
"reality" in some way.
2. The warning marker =naare and the fear marker =naate, in contrast describe
events that can be described as unreal, in that they either predict something
to happen or transfer the feeling that something unreal or unexpected has
happened already.
3. The frustrative marker =ta deals with the negative side of situations, as it
conveys the negative mood or atmosphere of a situation.
Note that this is only an attempt to relate these clitics to the grammar. From a
morphological perspective, the division does not match: the frustrative occurs
with negative inflection, but can also occur with affirmative clauses. While the
emphasis marker is only observed with affirmative clauses, its use with irrealis
forms is not excluded. The "unreal" warning and fear markers do not coincide
with irrealis marking at all, as it is unclear whether they are ever attached to
irrealis forms.
The rhetorical question marker =te at first sight may not be explicitly related
to attitude or emotion. However, I list it in this "zone" of postverbal markers as
its position is determined by the fact that it occurs after the interrogative clitic
=na (slot 23). Apparently it cannot be followed by any other enclitic, such as
the attitudinal markers, which makes it conceivable to assign it to the same
position. In fact, the use of =te may imply a certain "attitude" in so far as it may
involve curiosity or surprise. This is illustrated in (753a), where the question 'Is
firewood missing?' with the enclitic attached implies that the speaker did not
expect this situation. Example (753b) instead, the speaker already knows that
the listener bought something, but is investigating about the exact nature of the
bought item.
b) Implying curiosity:
d$a kurete-i=te
what buy-2ps=RHT
'What did you buy?'
While occurrences of =te as illustrated in (753) are observed, its use is much
more common in co-occurrence with the interrogative marker =na. The two
enclitics may be combined to =na(a)=te when the clause contains an Ο
argument and a verb only (cf. (754a)), but when the verb occurs with other
constituents, (e.g. a subject or object noun), the two clitics are split. In (754b),
for instance, =na is cliticised to the verb whereas =te is attached to the end of
the clause. Example (754c) differs from this as the interrogative marker occurs
after the first constituent to mark focus. As the number of examples that contain
the two markers is very limited, the exact conditions for the different positions
are unclear. However, =te occurs at the clause end at all times.
a) Ο + V=na=te:
kartutoo u-a-a=naa-te
shotgun.shells come-CAU 1 -3ps/A=INT=RHT
'Has he brought shotgun shells?' [Implying: Ί am quite sure that he has, since he
always brings some.']
ne-j=te
be-NOM sbj =RHT
'Are those who are here afraid to take its blood?'
c) PP=na + V + PP=te:
akauru raj=ßa nekurete-i raana ke=te
3pl for=INT sell-2ps w.l.peccary VLI=RHT
'Are you selling the white-lipped peccary to them?' [Context: Ί know that you are, but
I am not happy about it.']
Another suffix that can be attached to verbs (but also to nouns or other word
classes, cf. §5.3.6) is the emphasiser -atQa 'only'. In (757), some examples of
its occurrence on verbs are given. It appears before the person suffix in
examples (757a), and before the imperative form in (757b). As can be observed,
clitics such as =ra and =ta may follow the emphasiser -atQa. There are few
examples in which the emphasiser is preceded by other suffixes, which makes it
difficult to determine its exact position. The only attested examples contain a
plural object suffix that precedes -atQa (cf. (757b)). A peculiarity of -atQa is
that it can be followed by person marking suffixes, which implies that its
position is to be assigned somewhere between slot 7 and 16.
a)
mihiterua-atQa-a=ra
make.hungry-only-3ps/A=EMF
'He only made him hungry.'
b)
i=tQuerehe-uru=ra beelaj-atq,a-u=ra
2sg=child-PL=EMF love-only-IMP=EMF
'Just love your children!'
Another suffix that can be attached to verbs is -lai 'while', which is attached to
the neutral form of the verb. It forms a dependent clause with same subject
reference to the main clause and is suffixed to the neutral form of the verb.
Thus, -läi may be analysed as a verb-coordinating device (cf. §20.4). Example
(758b) demonstrates that the suffix is not attached to the 3ps/A suffix but indeed
to the neutral form or the verb. Otherwise, one would expect the clause to
exhibit number concordance (i.e. ku-uru-a-lai 'go'-PL-3ps/A-while). Instead,
the suffix -a is retained, which suggests that its function is not person marking
but an instance of the neutral form.
a)
akauru kaihje ini-a ku-a-lai hetau kami eori ne-t
3pl behind go.up-NTR go-NTR-while HRS sort.of termite.nest be-PRT
b)
hana ehipto kokzoajtQa-kuru akauru kaihje ku-a-lal satii nalu-~i
instead PLN inhabitant-PL 3pl behind go-NTR-while all fall-PRT
u-ure=lu
die-3pl/E=REM
'While they were going after the Egyptians, they all fell and died.' [NT: Hebrews
11:29]
The suffix -elanaala 'without' is attached to the verb as a privative form. The
suffix has the allomorph -lanaala occurring after the vowel /i/, such as
illustrated in (759a), and by forms such as siiri-lanaala 'without having' and
sini-lanaala 'without sleeping'. Otherwise, the initial /e/ of the suffix merges
with preceding vowel. It is one of the suffixes that absorb a preceding vowel /a/
or /e/: /it^a-elanaala/ 'without doing' and /here-elanaala/ 'without wanting'
are pronounced as [itpelanaala] and [herelanaala], respectively (cf. (759b)).
When the preceding vowels are /«/ or /u/, they are reduced to glides as
illustrated by [kwitak H elanaala] 'without knowing' and [enwelanaala]
'without entering' (underlying /eno-elanaala/; also cf. §3.4). The form for
'without seeing' (underlyingly /kwara-elanaala/) is an exception, as it is
realised as huaa-lanaala. Note that in a few isolated cases, the privative suffix
is also attested on word classes other than verbs. For instance, it is found with
the quantifier for 'all' in satii-elanaala 'without being all'.
a)
nete akauru ßasi-lanaala amu-e nii hanulari
but 3pl harm-PRV walk-3ps/E that jaguar
'But without harming them, those jaguars went away.'
b)
hjane-na here-lanaala aj/ia ku raasa-ure
leave-INF want-PRV with there dance-3pl/E
'Without letting her go, they danced with her there.'
In most cases, the privative suffix is attached directly to the root. However, it
can also be preceded by certain suffixes that form part of the positional slots
discussed in this chapter. The examples in (760) illustrate this with the causative
and possibility suffixes, respectively. In the NT, the occurrence of -elanaala is
also attested after suffixes for plural object and completive aspect, as in
hiruate-naha-elanaala ('help'-PLO-PRV) 'without helping them' and
w-rauta-si-lanaala (ITR-heal-CPL-PRV) 'without being healed'.
a) With causative:
nii rihei rukne-r at-elanaala u-a-re-ü=ni
that like repair-CAU2-PRV come-CAUl-IRR-lsg/E=ASS
Ί will bring it without having it repaired.' [About a gun that was supposed to be
repaired]
b) With possibility:
heräe ku-1, tihjaa-ka, heräe nijej suru-elanaala,
slowly go-PRT waIk.slowly-3ps/A slowly not.at.all run-PRV
suru-naka-helanaala
run-PSB-PRV
'They walked slowly, slowly without running at all, without being able to run.'
The functions of the participle suffix -i are further discussed in §20.3. In this
section, only its position in the verb complex is sketched. It can attach to any
verb and in most cases, -7 is attached to the root, as numerous examples
throughout this grammar already prove. However, it is also observed as
following a range of suffixes, as shown below:
The neutral marker -a (used after some introducers, in serial verb constructions,
and in citation form) cannot be followed by other suffixes. However, it may be
preceded by a variety of morphemes, such as causative, passive, plural object
and even continuous aspect. This is also discussed in §17 on serial verb
constructions, which investigates the use of the neutral marker in greater detail.
A further suffix to appear on verbs is the infinitive marker -na, which is used
to mark same subject complementation (cf. §20.2.1). Similar to other suffixes, it
can be preceded by other suffixes (cf.(762)). Examples for this include the
causatives -a and -erate (slots 1, 2), the plural object suffix and the distributive
(zone 7), and the velocity suffix (slot 8). However, most commonly, -na is
found as attached directly to the root.
b) After distributive:
itQa-hahoa-na najni-a
make-DSTR-INF be.able-3ps/A
'She was able to make one by one.'
In the following, the positions of the markers discussed in this section are
summarised. The table in (763) is an attempt to represent the available data in a
systematic way. However, one must be aware that some gaps still have to be
filled since not every possible combination is attested. T h e order of the
morphemes f r o m top to bottom may be understood as a tentative approach
towards a linear order.
12.5 Discussion
Even though person is the only obligatory marking on verbs, the large number
of suffixes that can be combined (with a few theoretical exclusions) makes
Urarina a highly polysynthetic language. To give an overview, the order of
suffixes that were presented in §12.2 is summarised in (764). The table does not
include those suffixes that exclude person marking, as was discussed in §12.4. 61
It also indicates whether the order of the respective slots may vary or not.
61
Recall that -afpa 'only' can occur with person markers, but at this stage, not enough
information is available as to determine its exact position.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:33 PM
Discussion 523
Suffixes of almost half of the slots are subject to variability in their order.
Systematic deviations apply to the position of the negative suffixes (slot 15), as
the negative marker -ene systematically changes position with the irrealis
marker in certain contexts (cf. §12.2.15). The position of the plural suffix -uru
may change in combination with the habitual Suffix (slot 6). Optional changes
in order are also observed with slots 6, 8, 9, and 10, as is illustrated in table
(765), which represents the compatibility of suffixes. Note that not all possible
combinations are attested (as indicated by question marks); further data is
needed to fill the present gaps. The compatibility of enclitics is discussed
further below.
Suffixes in the leftmost column (vertical) column of the table in (765)
precede the ones listed in the first row (horizontal). In addition, each suffix class
is numbered. The shaded areas indicate the impossible combinations ("no"),
whereas the unshaded fields ("yes") confirm that a combination in the indicated
order is possible. Characteristically, a suffix of a slot that precedes another, (e.g.
class 2 precedes class 3) cannot follow it. For instance, the continuous marker
suffix (4) does not precede the causative markers (1, 2), thus, these fields are
shaded and labelled "no". If there were no variability in the entire system, the
shaded area would cover exactly half of the table, following a diagonal line.
However, there are some deviations that modify this image. In summary, the
following variations apply:
1. The habitual suffix -reheto (6) is subject to position change, but this
behaviour is likely to be a result of other suffixes that move into a position
before it, rather than moving itself. In particular, it can be preceded by the
plural marker -uru (12) and by the plural object marker -naha (7).
2. The position class that follows the habitual aspect slot (6) was characterised
as a "suffix zone" earlier in this chapter. The reasons for this are, firstly, that
the order among the two suffixes that occupy this position is free. Secondly,
both suffixes can affect the position of other suffixes outside their zone by
moving around (but note that there seem to be no semantic or pragmatic
implications involved). However, the behaviour of the two suffixes is not
totally homogeneous: the distributive marker -ahua may shift to the front
and precede the suffix in slot 4, while it is unattested for occurrence before a
slot 6 suffix. In contrast, the plural object marker -naha may occur before
both of these slots.
3. The velocity suffix -uri (8) can appear in reverse order with both suffixes of
"zone" 7.
4. The diminutive form -hee (9) is also observed before suffix zone 7, i.e. before
the plural object and distributive suffixes. Surprisingly, it does not precede
the velocity marker (8). One may either assume that this is due to an active
shift by the diminutive suffix, or a result of a repositioning of zone 7
suffixes. While the first hypothesis seems more likely since all movements
so far were shifts to the front, the latter conforms to the fact that the order
between slot 8 and 9 is stable. Therefore, I suggest that the order RAP >
DIM > PLO/DSTR is due to the shift of class 7 suffixes.
From the position changes described above, one can conclude that there is a
"variable area" between slots 4 and 9, with actively floating morphemes in the
positional slots 7, 8, and 9. The high variability is also portrayed in (765), where
the unshaded fields below the diagonal line of "no"s make this area well visible.
Apart from this, most other variations in order are of a different quality:
5. The plural marker -uru (12) has been attested before the habitual suffix
-reheto (6), but does not occur in deviating position with other suffixes. Its
occurrence with the habitual marker may be characterised as exceptional;
any semantic or pragmatic implications still require further research. It
should be noted that its shift affects the high variability area sketched above,
but does not extend to other positions as these seem to be comparatively
stable.
6. The changes between the irrealis marker -ri (14) and the negative suffix -ene
(15) are of a very paradigmatic nature and cannot be compared to the
variability of other suffixes. In a systematic way, the negative suffix
precedes all irrealis forms for 3pl in the E- and D-conjugation class, whereas
for the Α-conjugation class, the order follows regular parameters.
Slot /suffix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9
-a -erate -naka -he -era -reheto -akwa -naha -uri -hee
1 -a n/a yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
2 -erate no n/a yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
3 -naka no no n/a yes no yes ? ? 7 yes
4 -he no no no n/a yes yes yes yes yes yes
5 -era no no no no no yes ? ? 7 yes
6 -rehe to no no no no no n/a no no no 7
7 -akiva no no no no no yes n/a yes yes yes
7 -naha no no no no no yes yes n/a yes yes
8 -uri no no no no no yes yes yes n/a yes
9-hee no no no no no no yes yes no n/a
10 -si no no no no no no no no no no
11-ana no no no no no no no no no no
12-uru no no no no no yes no no no no
13 -kaj no no no no no no no no no no
14 -ri no no no no no no no no no no
15 (NEG) no no no no no no no no no no
16 (PS) no no no no no no no no no no
17-fee no no no no no no no no no no
As a general rule, all enclitics follow the suffixes discussed above. There are
seven clitic slots, some of which include several enclitics. Their order is
summarised in (767). An analysis of the relative order of these enclitics reveals
a number of peculiarities, which can be outlined as follows:
1. The distribution of the witness marker =m (20) is in so far restricted as its
occurrence with the remoteness marker =lu (21) is excluded: while =ra can
occur before the reportative =he (which also is in slot no. 21), it is
incompatible with =/«. The explanation for this is by the functions of these
two markers, which exclude each other: while =lu refers to remote past, the
clitic =rn describes an event in the recent past. Note that =rti is also excluded
from co-occurring with any clitic from slot 24.
2. The enclitics of slot 21 can occur in any order with respect to each other,
without any apparent change in meaning. Since the function of these two
enclitics does not coincide at first sight, this slot may be described as a clitic
"zone", similar to the account for some of the suffixes investigated above.
For descriptive purposes, there also is the possibility to assign these two
clitics to separate slots; I have chosen to represent them as occupying one
single slot because their exact position with respect to each other cannot be
determined.
3. The reportative marker =he (21) does not precede the final negative marker
=ne (23) on the verb itself; however, it can be attached to an introducer that
precedes the verb. Some deviations are not well attested: its occurrence
before the politeness marker (19) is observed in one elicited example only.
As mentioned in the beginning of this chapter, the clitics following slots 22 are
actually clause clitics. However, since these occur in a systematic order, they
have been included in this discussion.
4. Slot 24 is represented as a single enclitic slot, as four clitics in this position
share functional features: they all describe emotion of attitude to some
degree and they cannot be combined with each other. The fifth member of
this clitic zone (rhetorical question marker =te) is infrequent in the database.
One of its peculiarities is its incompatibility with the assertive marker and
the witness evidential. For some other potential combinations, no
information is available.
5. The combination of enclitics for clause type (slot 23) and attitude (slot 24) on
the verb is subject to restrictions: while examples for the co-occurrence of
=ra or =ta with the final negative marker (which, for instance is found in
negative questions and in prohibitive clauses) are observed, no cases are
attested for their presence with the interrogative marker =na.
Overall, it is evident that the order of enclitics is less subject to variation than
the variability of suffixes. Most exclusions occurring with enclitics are based on
pragmatic incompatibilities.
Slot /clitic 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 23
=t$e =m =m =he =lu =tau =na =ne
18 =tge n/a yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
19 =«2 (ASS) yes n/a no yes no no yes yes
20 =m (WIT) no no n/a yes no yes yes yes
21 =he no no no n/a yes yes yes no
21 =/« no no no yes n/a yes yes yes
22 -tau no no no no no n/a no no
23 =m no no no no no no n/a no
23 =ne no no no no no no no n/a
24 =ra no no no no no no no no
24 =f a no no no no no no no no
24 =naare no no no no no no no no
24 =naate no no no no no no no no
24 =te no no no no no no no no
Urarina kinship terms can be divided into descriptive terms, such as 'my
mother' (kamt neb a) and address terms, such as oma 'mother'. These are
numbered for convenience in (768). While most descriptive and address terms
are identical, some deviations occur. Differences between the two terms occur
with no. 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, 17, and 19. Apart from that, with descriptive terms, the
use of full pronouns tends to be preferred, such as in kanu daka 'my wife's
brother' (no. 15), whereas in address terms, the cliticised version is used, which
is the older form and often exhibits clear morpho-phonological differences to
the term in isolation.62 For term no. 15, for instance, the cliticised form is
ka=taa. Other address terms tend to be used without a pronoun whatsoever,
such as aua 'daughter' (no. 17), where the descriptive term is kanu kahtnu.
Note that women use different address terms than men when talking to relatives
no. 3, 6, 8, 9, and 12. For 'my husband's sister' (no. 15b), there is a term that is
only used in conversation among women. The table in (768) is based on a male
62
Some aspects of cliticised and non-cliticised nouns were discussed in §7.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Kinship terms 531
The kinship relations are further illustrated through diagrams in (769) and
(770). Nodes that have the same kinship terms are numbered identically. Nodes
without any numbering have no corresponding terms.
Δ Ο Ο Δ ο
2
2 3 2 3 U 2 3 2 3'
Δ Ο Δ Ο Δ Δ Ο Δ Ο Δ Ο
EGO
10 Δ Ι Ι Ο = = Δ 2 6 Δ 1 2 0,3 = Δ 2 6
Within affinal relationships (cf. (770)), kinship terms are well specified for
E g o ' s direct descendants (lineal kin), but to a lesser degree for collateral kin.
E g o ' s own grandchildren are not further distinguished f r o m successive
generations of side branches.
20 A 21 Ο
18 Ο =-= 16 Δ 1 7 0 Ι9 Δ
2 Δ
11° Δ Ο
Δ 22 Ο Δ 22 Ο Δ 22 Ο Δ Ο
In addition to the relationships illustrated above, there are different terms for
younger vs. older siblings, as shown in (771). On the one hand, the descriptive
terms for younger sister vs. brother are identical; on the other, there is a match
between the address terms for younger and older sister. For male siblings, there
are several alternative address forms occurring in free variation.
The enclitic =t$e is used in conversations between members of the opposite sex
and between male in-laws. In §12.3.1, it was pointed out that the politeness
marker =t$e is homophonous with the plural marker for second person. Since
the use of 2pl forms as polite forms is wide-spread cross-linguistically, one may
assume that there is a diachronic relation between the two markers. The main
difference between the two is that the politeness morpheme is an enclitic,
whereas the pluraliser has suffix status, which is proven by their different
position in the verb. While the plural suffix occupies slot 17 and can be
followed by the assertive enclitic, the politeness clitic occurs in slot 18 and is
followed by clitics of subsequent slots, but not normally by the assertive marker
(cf. §12.3.2 for exceptions in the paradigm). Under no circumstances, two
instances of =t<^e could co-occur in the same word, which further supports the
view that they have the same origin. The result of their mutual exclusion,
however, is a certain degree of ambiguity: When a verb is marked for 2pl,
politeness is not marked separately and the question whether the utterance is
polite is a matter of interpretation. This is illustrated in (772a), where the
woman Lomai is talking to a group of men. The fact that there are several
addressees requires plural marking; the fact that they are men and the speaker is
a woman requires marking with the politeness clitic. However, =t$e is marked
only once. In example (772b), the ambiguity is resolved by the context: here,
the speaker addresses a group of people, but since the conversation is between
men, =t$e cannot be interpreted as a polite form. Finally, when a verb that is
inflected for 2sg is followed by the politeness marker, it can be interpreted as
2pl, if the assertive marker is not present. This is shown in (772c): from the
context it becomes clear that the conversation is between two persons only and
thus, =t$e cannot be interpreted as plural. Instead, =t$e is used as a polite form
in the conversation between in-laws here.
a) (Girls to uncle)
ku bahe mitQauri+mitga-uri-l ku lauta-1 raatiri-1
there calabash RED+fill-RAP-PRT there lay.down-PRT leave-PRT
b) (Girls to uncle)
he, kanakaanu=tQe kaa=ra itgene, na-a kn-uru-a
hey lpl/ex=PLT this=EMF uncle say-NTR go-PL-3ps/A
"'Hey, uncle, this is us" they went to say.'
In the same narrative, when the uncle replies, he uses =tge on the first inflected
verb (a/a). The second verb that carries inflection for person (nekajatai) also
contains =tQe, but in this case it is not distinguishable from the plural suffix, as
the speaker addresses two persons.
kahe=ra nekajata-i-tg,e=ta
from=EMF return-2ps-PL=FRS
"'Hey, that's right. How did you return from the bad indios?'" [Uncle to girls]
a)
siiri-ki=tQe=ne ka=raj te-u=tge
have-2ps=PLT=CND lsg=for give-IMP=PLT
'If you have [any], give [some] to me!'
b)
siiri-tQäu=ne=na d^e=te-re-u=t^
have-1 sg/D=CND=FOC: 1 sg 2sg=give-IRR-1 sg/E=PLT
'If I had [any], I would give you [some].'
Further instances for the use of =t$e are found in conversations between men
and women in the NT. In (776a), the marker occurs twice; more exactly, =tge is
attached to both inflected verbs: the first occurrence is in the dependent clause
and the second on the verb of the main clause. While this implies that =t$e can
occur on all finite verbs, its presence is not obligatory on all verbs (also cf.
(777c)). The example in (776b) exhibits only one instance of =t$e, but it
contains one finite verb only. The politeness marker here is used even though
the addressee is not mentioned in the utterance, i.e. the speaker makes a general
statement about persons not involved in the conversation ('all'). However, since
this utterance is still part of his conversation with a woman, =t$e must be
present.
kukuri-a ku-re=l=toe=ra
be.thirsty-NTR go-IRR:3ps/E=ASS=PLT=EMF
'Whoever drinks from this water shall thirst again.' [NT: John 4:3; Jesus to woman]
A s mentioned above, the use of =t$e between men and women in general is
reciprocal. Every man is expected to use the enclitic when talking to any
w o m a n . On average, a person is regarded an adult at about the age of 15. In
conversation with children, i.e. when the addressee is not regarded as an adult,
the use of =tQe does not apply. However, there are no initiation rites that would
formally mark the transition into adulthood.
A father must address his daughter using =tg,e once she is married or reaches
marital age, (which, again, would be at around 15 years of age). In asymmetry
to this, mothers do not address their sons with =tg>e. The enclitic is also not used
a m o n g spouses, reciprocally.
The honorific enclitic =tg,e is also used in a different context, which involves
conversations between in-laws. It should be explained that this relation is of
particular importance to the Urarina, due to uxorilocal marital customs: when
people get married, (which is usually arranged by the parents, but exceptions
are observed), the man leaves his parents and becomes part of his w i f e ' s family.
This involves moving into the w i f e ' s family's house. Typically, the married
couple will then build their house in close vicinity to the w i f e ' s family, i.e. next
to their house. When marrying a woman from another village, the man leaves
the village of his parents. In addition, the m a n ' s labor is assigned to his new
family and he will work on his father-in-law's field, go hunting with him, etc.
Given these circumstances, it is not surprising that the relationship between
" o l d " and " n e w " family are accompanied by a certain degree of deference,
which is expressed linguistically. Interestingly, the polite form is used only
between male relatives who are in an in-law relationship, as will be further
discussed below. The examples in (777) are part of a narrative where a man
goes hunting with his son-in-law, in accordance with tradition. While the older
man goes to check a trap he had set, his son-in-law goes hunting on the river.
A s expected, =t$e is marked on the imperative forms of the verbs in (777a,b)
and on the 3ps form of the verb in (777c). However, in (777b), the politeness
marker is only attested on the main verb, which suggests that its use on
dependent finite verbs is optional.
b) Father-in-law to son-in-law:
m-a d$a=ne e7eo-käu=ne tQäe u-u=tge, huru-a
be-3ps/D something=CND shout-lsg/D=CND also come-IMP=PLT snap-3ps/D
c) Father-in-law to son-in-law:
mi hau ajßa raj nakana raj ßäe huru-a=t$e bitoa, na-a=ne
that because with POSS son-in-law for already snap-3ps/A=PLT trap say-3ps/D
and respectful way (at least in certain given contexts). Nonetheless, the example
in (778), where Jesus is approached by a man who treats him very respectfully,
shows that this is not the case and that no honorific marker whatsoever is used
with anybody but members of the opposite sex and with in-laws.
häu manatü
because even
'Master, I want to come with you wherever you go.' [NT: Matthew 8:19]
63
In most examples of this narrative, the presence of =fpe is ambiguous with the plural
marker, as Lomai usually addresses the whole group. This is the only instance in
which she talks to a single listener.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
540 Politeness
stylistic device to illustrate the lack of deference in his speech. (The man
ultimately pays the price for his behaviour, as he is bewitched and changed into
a heron.) The lack in deference towards Lomai is also illustrated in example
(779b), where the people address her without using the politeness marker.
he i=tQuara-ri-a-u=ni=ta
hey 2sg=see-IRR-NEG-lsg/A=ASS=FRS
'When she said "(please) move a way a little. I want to bathe", even though Lomai said
so, he [the visitor], sitting there, [said] "Hey, I won't look at you".'
amu-naa+kiuaaun-era=ra
walk-NOM+create-AG
'Arriving at Lomai's place [they said], "Hey, the Creator of Ways has sent us to your
place.'
Further research will be necessary in order to define the exact margins for the
presence and absence of =tg>e. However, the general idea of its use in a strictly
defined, inalterable context, restricted to certain groups of people, should be
rather clear.
conditions applies to the subject of the clause. The example in (780a) is not
directly addressed to the in-law himself, but represents a permission to someone
else to let the in-law in. Note that if a woman were addressed to let the in-law
in, =fpe would be added to the verb. Example (780b) is understood accordingly.
The interpretation as 'my son-in-law' is only known through the context.
a)
eno-ana-ipe
enter-ILT-JUSS
'He (my in-law) may enter!
b)
kwajtei kohzvamo ari-a ku-akaanu hau leijhti
again the.next.day seek-NTR go-lpl/ex because one
tabiitQa ru-hi-ana-e
finally find-DIM-ILT-3ps/E
'As we went to seek [turtles] again on the next day, he (my son-in-law) finally found
one.'
The suffix -ana is used by men and women in different ways, again with the
women having to make less use of the polite form. For a male Ego, the in-law
suffix is used in five contexts:
a) About my son-in-law (no. 19 in table (768))
b) About my father in-law (no. 20)
c) About my mother-in-law (no. 21)
d) About the husband of my sister's daughter (no. 26 in table (768))
e) About a godfather, as will be explained below.
Remarkably, the in-law suffix is not used when referring to 'my daughter-in-
law' (no. 18 in (768)), 'my wife's brother' (no. 15), 'my wife's son' (no. 12),
nor to 'my sister's husband', for which there is no specific term at all. A female
Ego uses -ana in reference to her son-in-law only, but not about persons
classified as b), c), or d). Thus, the way of application of the in-law suffix is
highly asymmetrical between the two genders.
The relationship mentioned in e) is based on godfatherhood referred to as
compadre or comadre in local Spanish. Principally, a compadre is someone
who assists a woman in giving birth, specifically by cutting the umbilical cord.
Most typically, the woman herself nominates the compadre (otherwise, the
husband may select one). In the same way as with contexts a) to d), the in-law
suffix -ana is used to refer to persons who are in a compadre relationship to the
speaker, subject to certain conditions. From a female Ego's point of view, 'a
man who attended my child's birth' in the above described way is compadre. In
this case, the woman will use the in-law suffix when talking about him.
Secondly, a man will use this form when referring to the husband of a woman
whose baby he helped to be born. As the use is reciprocal, the husband will also
use this suffix to refer to the helper.
In addition to the use of the suffix -ana, there are also certain address terms
to be used among people with a compadre relationship (as explained above):
1. Men who are in a compadre relationship with each other address each other
as kofiua.
2. A man and a woman who are in a compadre relationship address each other
as kaana. Alternatively, the woman may address the man as köfioaere.
Based on this additional context for the use of the in-law suffix, the following
examples can be understood. In one narrative, a very special context applies, as
the relationship between the speaker and the person referred to is not strictly
based on an in-law relationship. In fact, the speaker is a monkey who teaches a
woman how to give birth, (which, according to the story, nobody knew up to
that point, as husbands used to cut their wives' belly in order to deliver a child -
which resulted in the woman's death). While the husband is away in order to
find a bamboo stick that would cut the belly, the monkey functions as the
comadre to the woman who subsequently gives birth to a child and survives. By
gaining the status of comadre, a kind of in-law type relationship is created
between the monkey and the husband. As a result, the monkey uses the in-law
suffix when talking about the woman's husband (cf. (781)).
(781) In-law suffix occurring in special context: monkey talking about his 'in-law'
a)
nuta, ßäe u-hi-ana-a, ßäe u-a raj ßakaana
look! already come-CNT-ILT-3ps/A already come-3ps/A POSS godfather
'Look, he is coming already; his [the baby's] father has already come.'
b)
tg,äe ßäe ne-molo-a raj misi=jκ amu-a ku-ana-iße,
also already ITR-cut-3ps/D POSS umbilical.cord=CND walk-NTR go-ILT-JUSS
c)
mhjauria tQäe kati saate-nana-a=ne, na-e hetau
don't also black.monkey kill.by.blowgun-ILT-NTR=NEGF say-3ps/E HRS
mi eerie raj
that woman for
"'Also, he [the father] ought not to kill black monkeys", [the monkey] said to the
woman.'
In addition to the two morphemes that are employed to mark politeness, Urarina
has a few strategies by which politeness can be expressed optionally. The forms
that are used with this purpose usually have other grammatical functions: the
suffix -hee is a diminutive form and the suffix -uri functions as a velocity
marker.
lama 'be missing', the core meaning of the resulting form lam-hee-ka is 'a
little (of something) is missing', but this expression is commonly used to imply
Ί need', as illustrated in (782).
Alternatively, the same sentence as above can be used without the diminutive
suffix (lanaa karaj fioanara) but this would be perceived as rude. However, the
interpretation as a polite function is rather contextual, as the co-occurrence of
lanaa with -hee can also have purely diminutive meaning, as shown in (783).
This sentence is again taken from the narrative where the black monkey
instructs a woman in childbearing. She is told to teach ten other women about it,
but the woman leaves out one, telling it to nine women only. As no direct
interaction between monkey and woman is involved in this situation, the
meaning of -hee is unambiguously interpreted as diminutive ('only one was
missing').
A verb related to lamia is with nelaatia 'be necessary'. In (784a), its use is
illustrated by an example from one of the Urarina flood stories, where the
woman Lomai floods the earth with her urine. Beforehand, she warns the people
about the consequences, but they disregard her advice and mock at her. This
example shows a more general meaning of 'be necessary' as 'be relevant,
useful'. The sentence in (784b) is a general statement about a need. It can, but
need not be understood as a request from a pragmatic point of view, but would
not be polite in this form; however, if the same example were accompanied by
-hee, its interpretation as a plea would be quite obvious.
a)
d$a ke=te nelaate-re nii hjane kulurunoi=ta
what VLI=FOC be.necessary-IRR:3ps/E that urine dirty=FRS
'What for would that dirty urine be necessary?' [i.e. 'relevant']
b)
kuriki=te nelaate-re
money=FOC be.necessary-IRR:3ps/E
'Money would be required [in order to buy building materials for the school].'
(785) Use of nelaatia 'be necessary' with diminutive -hee to imply politeness
amiane-naa itga-na ke nelaate-hee-käu=ne
work-INF do-NOM VLI be.necessary-DIM-lsg/D=SUB
'... that I am almost worthy to work'fNT: Luke 16:3]
Another verb related to the same lexical root is the transitive verb laatia 'need',
as illustrated in (786). In this example, the verb occurs with its core meaning as
'need', without any connotation of politeness.
In (787), the use of laatia with the diminutive is exemplified and, not
surprisingly, in this combination it can refer to politeness. The suffix -hee here
does not mean that the offer of ayahuasca regards a small amount only, but it is
an instance of playing down the listeners' expectations, i.e. the speaker implies
that the listeners would not dare to make a rude request (who, in fact, did not
ask for it at all). However, the distinction between diminutive and politeness
cannot be determined formally, but is only recognised by the context.
Based on the different examples of -hee with polite functions, one can conclude
that this function only applies to interactive discourse, i.e. when directly
addressing a listener. When merely reporting facts without expecting a reaction
from the listener, the diminutive is used with its actual function.
The velocity marker -uri can also take functions as a diminutive and as a
politeness marker. The latter function is restricted to its occurrence with
imperatives. However, even in this context, -uri can refer to rapid speed, as
indicated in (788a), where it describes 'one single cut'. In other contexts, it may
mean 'a little', thus having diminutive meaning.
a) Velocity:
lejhii mulu-ri-ul
one cut-RAP-IMP
'Cut off one piece!'
b) Diminutive:
amu-atga-u, murutae-ri-u=ra!
walk-only-IMP move.away-RAP-IMP=EMF
'Just go, move a little over here!'
In the examples shown in (789a), the use of -uri involves a polite function in
addition to the diminutive reference. While 'stay a little' is one connotation, this
also implies that it is a cautious, polite request that does not ask too much from
the invited. In (789b), politeness is combined with the velocity function of -uri:
'Quickly try my pet' is an invitation for a meal that is not intended to delay the
guests.
ajte mi lomaj
say:3ps/E that PSN
"'Hey, please stay a little with me first", Lomai said to them.'
hau
because
'As she gave it [the snail] to them, saying "Hey, well, please try my pet" ...'
As seen above, both functions of -uri are well compatible with politeness, given
an adequate contextual frame. Both imply a certain degree of modesty in
making a request, by which the imperative is significantly "softened".
There are two more ways to express politeness. These involve the use of lexical
items that literally have another function. A feature that is shared by both
strategies is that they occur in combination with imperatives only, where their
use corresponds to the "softening" function of -uri as suggested above.
a)
karuru-a hau, jiäe=ra, ka=raj mi hiririßo ra-1, kanu
clean-3ps/D because already=EMF lsg=for that bagre.fish take-PRT lsg
b)
eresi ka=raj k=ahima kaa enejtgu+suri enoala-u=ra
tomorrow lsg=for lsg=before this monkey+stomach cook-IMP=EMF
'(Kindly) prepare this monkey stomach for me, before I [arrive] tomorrow!'
T h e literal meaning of 'for m e ' is not neutralised in any attested example, i.e.
there is no apparent lexicalisation as a politeness marker. In fact, ka=raj is not
formally distinguishable from an adjunct that would be added in the same way.
For instance, a clause such as 'give it to m e ' involves ka=raj, which does not
necessarily have polite meaning here. However, the polite connotation of ka=raj
in combination with an imperative can be understood as asking a favour in
many situations, always depending on the context.
Another lexical strategy for making a request "softer" and thus more polite is by
the word atii, which the Urarina use to translate the Spanish word for 'please'
{por favor). Its primary meaning is 'nevertheless', which in turn has the literal
translation 'insisting'. Even though no examples for a verb atia 'insist' (whose
participle form would be atii, correspondingly), are attested at this stage, this
etymological origin would be very plausible, as the statement of a request can
involve a certain degree of insisting, especially in the light of original Urarina
culture, in which modesty is a virtue. The examples in (791) first illustrate the
most c o m m o n use of atii, meaning 'nevertheless'. In these cases, the
connotation of 'insisting' is well visible: The sentence in (791a) describes a
scene where people detain the woman Lomai even though she wants to leave.
As there is an ongoing struggle over whether they would release her, the
connotation of 'insisting' is very adequate. The scene continues in (791b),
where, despite L o m a i ' s warnings, the people do not let her go and subsequently
she floods the earth with her urine. The fact that the people continue with their
party can conceivably be described as a way of 'insisting'.
a)
na-a hau hetau atii ku hjane-na here-kur-ene
say-3ps/D because HRS nevertheless there leave-INF want-PL-NEG: 3 ps/E
'As she said so, they still did not want to let her go.'
b)
hi atii räasa-ure ßäe akauru heruri katä uuhual m-a
there nevertheless dance-3pl/E already 3pl waist middle until be-3ps/D
akau hau
water because
'As the water already reached the height of their waists, they [still] danced
nevertheless.'
a)
d$aha-l=tQa, hitäi kajßa-ku-tg,e ka=raj atü ka=raj=t$a,
come.on-PRT=EMF all return-IMP-PL lsg=for please lsg=for=EMF
b)
atü ka=raj lenone te-u
please lsg=for food give-IMP
'Please give me food!'
As both examples illustrated in (792) show, atii can be combined with ka=raj as
a polite form, which reinforces the degree of politeness implied. It should also
be mentioned that the syntactic position of both forms used as lexical strategies
for politeness is quite variable, as atü as well as ka=raj can occur before or after
the verb.
13.6 Summary
64
The exact degree of productivity for the last three strategies is not well known.
However, I assume that it is not restricted by verb type or similar factors.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Summary 551
There are several allomorphs for the negative suffix, whose realisation is based
on the three different person inflection classes. Their distribution is summarised
here (for the full paradigm, see § 12.2.15):
- For all E-, D-forms, the negative suffix is -em.
- For Α-forms, the negative suffix is -a for lps, -e for 2ps, and -i for 3ps
(which probably is an allomorph of-e, see discussion in §12.2.15).
- In the Α-form, minor deviations occur when the negative suffix is preceded
by the irrealis marker -ri.
Regarding the distinction between different verb classes, such as transitive vs.
other verb types, no differences for negative marking occur. In the examples
(794) to (796), the occurrence of negative suffixes with all verb classes is
illustrated.
In (794a), the occurrence of negation suffixes is shown with the transitive
verb for 'drink'. Correspondingly, examples (794b-c) illustrate the negation of
active and stative intransitive verbs. Verbs describing posture, shape, or colour
behave accordingly. An example for a negated intransitivised verb is given in
(796a).
a) Transitive verb:
ipono ku-em-a katQa-ne
ayahuasca drink-NEG-3ps/D man=CND
'if a man does not drink ayahuasca'
b) Intransitive verb:
mtoani-a=na hau kuriae ktt-i ruru
be.like.that-3ps/D=SUB because distance go-NEG:3ps/A howler.monkey
'Because it is like that, the howler monkey does not go far [from his place].'
c) Stative verb:
ahißa-i rdi anofiua
be.sharp-NEG:3ps/A that knife
'That knife is not sharp.'
Also, the copula is no exception from regular negation marking. In (795a), the
negation refers to identification ('is not'), whereas in (795b), it marks negative
existential ('is not there').
b) Existence:
nukue seti-aka=ne ni-ji ate taba-j
creek fish-lpl/du=CND be-NEG:3ps/A fish be.big-NOM
'When we fished in the creek, there were no big fish.'
eene-kuru jnaelu
woman-PL earlier
'Earlier, women did not give birth to children like now.'
In general, negative forms on the verb can co-occur with almost any other suffix
or clitic. Exceptions from this are negative questions, for which specific rules
apply (cf. §14.5) and the attitudinal marker =ra (cf. §12.3.7).
A negative suffix on the verb has the entire clause in its scope. This also applies
to clauses that involve serial verb constructions, as exemplified in (797): only
one negative marker may appear here (marked on the second verb), whereas the
first verb is non-finite and forms part of the same clause. It should also be noted
that NPs or other constituents cannot be in the scope of negation.
With participle clauses, the scope of negation can extend to structures that
involve more than a simple clause. This is the case with clause coordinations
through the participle form, as shown in (798). However, this type of negation
is rather infrequent. An alternative strategy is to express the dependent verb as a
subordinate clause with a conjugation, in which case the verb receives full
inflection for polarity and person.
a)
nerela-t amiani-ji, nijej d$a siiri-ri-ßa=i
learn-PRT work-NEG:3ps/A not.at.all what have-IRR-NEG:3ps/A=ASS
'He does neither work nor study, he will not have anything at all.'
b)
kuriae bahi-tpuhwa kahe amu-i ne-ene ruru
distance defecate-LOC from walk-PRT be-NEG:3ps/E howler.monkey
'The howler monkey does not go far from his toilet.'
The negative form for 3ps/A of the copula is nijej, usually simplified to ttiji.65
As already shown in (795), this forms functions as the negation for identity and
existence. However, nijej also occurs with other functions, which suggests that
65
The distinction between nijej 'not at all' and ni-ji 'be'-NEG:3ps/A in the transcription
is not based on phonological differences, but in order to distinguish the two
meanings.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
556 Negation
a)
ipono ku-eni-a kat$a=ne nijej kana+hvaaun-era here-noi
ayahuasca drink-NEG-3ps/D man=CND not.at.all our.creator want-PASS
itQa-i
do-NEG:3ps/A
'If someone does not drink ayahuasca, he does not do God's will at all.'
b)
nii hau nijej beraj-jiaa najp-ene raj komasaj
that because not.at.all care.for-INF be.able-NEG:3ps/E POSS wife
'Therefore, his wife could not look after him at all.'
a)
d$a kauatQa m-ji=lu
what good be-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'There was nothing good [for hunting].'
b)
nii häu=te d$a ke situ-elanaala turu-ure raj ne-naha
that because=FOC what VLI happen-PRV arrive-3pl/E POSS be-LPP
'Therefore, without anything happening, they arrived at their place.'
a)
d$abana nitoane-j hoara-eni-a=ne baja
when be.like.that-NOMsbj see-NEG-3ps/D=SUB after
'after they had never seen something like that...'
b)
d$u ku-uru-i
where go-PL-NEG:3ps/A
'They have not gone anywhere.'
c)
d^uni eno-naa najni-ji=lu
nobody enter-INF be.able-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'Nobody could enter [the creek].'
This type of negation can be emphasised through the presence of nijej 'not at
all' in addition to the interrogative plus negation on the verb. In fact, examples
of this type occur rather frequently in the database. For instance, when nijej
precedes d$a in a negative clause, the negation is emphasised to mean
'absolutely nothing' or 'nothing at all'. This interpretation suggests that nijej
functions as an emphatic negator with adverbial function. In (802), nijej
modifies the interrogative d^a, which functions as the Ο argument of the
negated verb and is interpreted as 'nothing' through the negation on the verb.
The emphatic meaning of nijej is also illustrated with another expression: the
word lejhi-ße-he-ι ('one'-AUX-CNT-PRT) (with some variants in
lejhipehel kauti-ji=lu
not.even.one remain-NEG:3ps/A=REM
'Not even a single one remained [without drinking ayahuasca].'
At first sight, a few examples appear to contain rnjej as negating a noun, which
is shown in (804): In this sentence, rnjej kahjune could be translated as 'no
clothes'. However, since this is a very rare example, it is more likely to assume
that the presence of rnjej refers to the whole negative clause, thus referring to
the verb. The translation as 'they did not wear clothes at all' is therefore the
more precise one, as indicated by the square brackets in (804), which indicate
that the negated constituent involves the noun only, whereas rnjej precedes the
negated noun.
'Earlier, people did not wear any clothes.' [Lit. 'they did not wear clothes at all']
Urarina has a word class of clause introducers, most of which convey negativity
in one way or the other. Three of them (nihjauria, hjauipe, kwa) are used as
prohibitives, kivatia is an emphasising negative introducer for 'not'; nabana
introduces as dependent clause for negative purpose 'so that not' (cf. §14.4.4),
and ta is an introducer for negative questions (cf. §14.5). For convenience, they
are listed again in (805). Examples to illustrate their use can be found in §5.10.
nihjauria Prohibitive 'don't' (with 2ps on the verb and final negative enclitic)
hjauiße Prohibitive 'don't', (with 2ps on the verb and final negative enclitic)
kwa Prohibitive 'don't' (with NTR inflection on verb)
kwatia Negative (emphasis) 'not' (with negative inflection on the verb)
nabana Adversative (optional; always co-occurring with huataa 'that not')
ta Negative question, (also cf. 14.5)
Note that with the prohibitive introducers nihjauria and hjauipe and with the
negative question introducer, the final negative enclitic =ne co-occurs in clause-
final position (also cf. §2.11).
b) [Lomai's reply]
hjauißß=ra, kwatia ka=kahia ka=atane ke
no=EMF not this=this.area this=land VLI
hja-eni-akaanu kanakaanu=ta
urinate-NEG-1 pl/ex lpl/ex=FRS
'No! We do not urinate on this earth [she replied].'
Another expression for ' n o ' in the traditional language is nitokwara, which still
appears to be in use in the Tigrillo dialect. In the only attested example, it is
used with a contradictory function to indicate that the speaker will not comply
with a prohibition. In this particular situation, a man refuses to depart, assuring
Lomai that he w o n ' t watch her while she is taking a bath, after she demanded
that he leave.
Apart from the use of a negative interjection, there are two other ways to give a
negative response to a question. One is by replying with the negative form of
the verb that was used in the question; the other involves the intransitive verb
aja 'do/be'. In its most typical form, it is simply given as aji, which corresponds
to the negation of 3ps/A. Literally, this means 'it does not' or 'it is not', but has
a strongly lexicalised character. Alternatively, the verb can be inflected for
negation in the same way as other verbs. In this case, it has the function of an
auxiliary. In (809a), the use of aji as an auxiliary with its literal meaning 'it
does/did not' is given; in (809b), its use as ' n o ' is illustrated, and (809c) shows
the use of the verb with inflection for negative 1 sg future tense.
66
This example exhibits a number of grammatical irregularities that are typical for
younger speakers. For details on language change, cf. §23.2.
a)
ßaara ke hatal banehelanaala hoaauku-ü mihiite-na-ana
2pl VLI very very.much think-lsg/E be.hungry-NOM-inside
ne-i-tg,e=ne hoataa
be-2ps-PL=SUB so.that.not
Ί am thinking exceedingly much of you so that you would not be in hunger.'
b)
kolektivo kuane kau-a ku-i=jie huataa=na ajto-5
public.bus inside return-NTR go-2ps=SUB so.that.not=FOC:Isg say-lsg/E
Ί said it so that you would not return home by public bus.'
Similar to the use of interrogatives with negation, there are a few further
expressions that slightly change their meaning when occurring in a negated
clause. The idiom kauatga najjiehei, for instance, is used to mean 'pretty much'
in an affirmative clause. Its meaning may also imply 'very well', or 'entirely',
depending on the context. Structurally, the idiom is composed of kauatQa
'good' plus the continuous participle form of najrna 'be able', whose literal
translation is opaque in terms of its relation to its function. Therefore, it is
legitimate to state that kauatQa najßehei is lexicalised. With negation, it refers
to 'pretty (much) nothing' or 'absolutely nothing', as shown in (812). The
expression is used with adverbial function. A further example is also found in
(804).
a) Positive use:
hitarii kauatQa najpehel kam kahe kaa atane karuru-u=ra
all pretty.much lsg from this land clean-IMP=EMF
'Clean this soil all pretty well from me!'
b) Negative use:
ßäe bati-a, satii hakuru-e, ßäe ni-ji kauatQa najßehei,
already sink-3ps/A all dry-3ps/E already be-NEG:3ps/A pretty.nothing
When the temporal adverbs ßäe 'already' and hajti 'still' occur in a negative
clause, they are translated as 'not any more' and 'not yet', respectively.
b) 'Not yet':
hajti u-em-a elo taba-j=ße hana, raj
still come-NEG-3ps/D rain be.big-NOM Sb j=SUB when POSS
14.4.6 'Without'
a)
ßäe ahe-uru-a=ne hau hoara-elanaala raatiri-ure
already get.drunk-PL-3ps/D=SUB because see-PRV leave-3pl/E
'As they were already drunk, they left her behind without seeing her.'
b)
mtoanei n-ukwana ha-ure ßäe tabauru satii-elanaala
like.that 3ps-field make-3pI/E already some all-PRV
'Already some cultivate their fields like that, [but] not all.'
a)
mi hau urarißa-uru nii kulane ne-na here-kuru-i
that because Urarina-PL that without be-INF want-PL-NEG:3ps/A
'Therefore, the Urarina do not want to live without this.'
b)
ruenia ne-naa=te kihja kulane ne
stern be-NOM=FOC paddle without be:3ps/E
'The one who is in the stern is without a paddle.'
This past sections have illustrated that negativity can be expressed in various
ways beside the actual inflection on the verb. However, Urarina does not seem
to have any derivational processes related to negativity (such as 'un-tie' in
English), nor has it negative tags (corresponding to 'didn't he').
a)
d$atoam-a rdtgae ikito-o, ta u-a elo=ne
be.how-3ps/A over.there PLN-LOC NEGQ come-3ps/A rain=NEGF
'How is it over there in Iquitos? Is it not raining?'
b)
ta ate ra-uru-a katca-uru=ne=ta
NEGQ fish receive-PL-3ps/A man-PL=NEGF=FRS
'Have the people not caught any fish?'
As is evident from the examples in (816), the verb in a negative question takes
the regular affirmative inflection rather than negative marking. Also note that
this clause type always requires the Α-form of the verb, which, however, is a
general feature of polar questions.
The answer to a negative question is given in a similar way as with positive
questions. Most typically, a form of the intransitive auxiliary aja is used. As
illustrated in (817a), the answer to the negative question that preceded ('Have
you not caught any fish?') is negative, which is marked by the negative form
ajaakaanu 'we did not'. A similar case is given in (817b), where the second part
of the reply is optional.
a) Negative reply [to question 'Have you not caught any fish?' (816b)]:
aj-a-akaanu=ra, ratato-a niki nete
AUX-NEG-1 pI/ex=EMF pull-3ps/A ADVRS but
'No (we did not) [catch any fish]. It pulled, but...'
b)
ta lenone=na here-i=jie - aj-i, (lenone heri-a-u)
NEGQ food-INF want-2ps=NEGF AUX-NEG:3ps/A food want-NEG-lsg/A
'Don't you want to eat?' - 'No, (I don't want food.)'
In contrast, a positive reply to a negative question, i.e. one that disagrees with
the proposal implied through the negative question, is introduced by eehe, an
interjection normally used in positive reply to a positive question ( ' y e s ' ) . In
(818), this is shown as a positive reply to the first part of (817b), as an answer to
the question ' D o n ' t you want to eat?'.
a)
ta lenone-na here-i=jie - eehe, lenone heri-tQäu
NEGQ food-INF want-2ps=NEGF yes food want-lsg/A
'Don't you want to eat?' - '[But] yes [on the contrary]: I want food.'
b)
ta hajti turu-a=ne - eehe, ßäe turu-a
NEGQ still arrive-3ps/A=NEGF yes already arrive-3ps/A
'Has he not arrived yet?' - '[But] yes, he has arrived.'
It is also possible (but less typical) to omit the interjection eehe and only reply
by repeating the verb of the question marked for the respective polarity. An
alternative way to reply positively to a negative question is by the affirmative
form of aja, as illustrated in (819). Interestingly, not the l s g form (to mean Ί
d o ' ) is chosen, but the 3ps/A form, which literally means 'it is'.
It is not possible to actually mark negation twice on the same verb. However, in
the light of different strategies presented above, several of these strategies can
be used within the same clause. The effect of this, however, is not to imply
positivity, but negativity is emphasised through the combination of several
negative strategies. In (820), a number of possible combinations of such
strategies are shown. This list is not exhaustive, as other combinations of the
different strategies discussed in this chapter may be possible.
Example (820a) contains three different strategies of negation, including the
negative introducer, 'not at all', and the negative form of aja. It represents the
statement from the "first contact" situation, where an Urarina who is sent by the
priest assures his companions that the priest is not dangerous at all and that they
should let him live. Example (820b) is taken from the same narrative; here, the
negative marking on the verb is accompanied by mjej and kwatia, preceding the
verb, and two idiomatic expressions that take negative function in a negative
clause (cf. (803), (812)). In (820c), negativity is expressed through the
postposition kulane 'without', which negates the preceding interrogative
pronoun d^a to mean 'without anything'. The negation is emphasised by the
presence of rnjej, which results in the reading as 'without anything at all'.
In summary, one could say that the function of employing several negative
strategies within the same clause is to emphasise the impact of negation, i.e. to
imply "strong" negativity.
Commands for 2ps are marked by the suffix -u, which is attached to the verb
67
stem. With regard to the phonological properties of this morpheme, it can be
classified as a suffix that forms a separate syllable when combined with a stem
(cf. §3.3). Optional lengthening of the vowel preceding the imperative marker is
common. The realisation of -u as -o or -u is the result of general phonological
regularities that disallow sequences of /u/ and /«/ (cf. §2.2). Another alternation
occurs with verbs that take the 3ps/A suffix -ka (instead of /-a/, cf. §3.1.3): the
imperative of these verbs is realised as -ht.
a) Allomorph -«:
bute kusipa-u enua+sakari ke
boat close-IMP tree+resin INST
'Close the boat with tree resin!'
67
1 distinguish "root" and "stem": the latter is to be understood as the root plus any
derivational extensions of the root.
b) Allomorph -u:
ahajna heloo haa-u
forest towards throw-IMP
'Throw it towards the forest!'
c) Allomorph -ku:
katga-uru kutia-ku
man-PL invite-IMP
'Invite the people!'
There are a few grammatical categories that can co-occur with the imperative.
These include the causative -a (cf. §12.2.1), the emphasiser -atga (cf. §12.4),
the velocity marker -uri (cf. §12.2.8), the distributive and plural object suffixes
(cf. §12.2.7), the plural marker -tg,e (cf. (826)), and the distal form -ni (cf.
(824)). Other categories are not attested with the imperative form. For instance,
there are no examples with the otherwise very frequent continuous form, or with
any other aspect marker. However, the imperative form is often followed by the
final emphatic marker =ra in the traditional language. The examples in (822)
illustrate the occurrence of -u after different kinds of derivational suffixes.
Note that the presence of the velocity suffix such as in (822e) is also employed
to mark politeness in many cases, when occurring with the imperative. As
discussed in §13.4.2, the velocity function of -uri can coincide with a
diminutive function; however, the distinction between these functions and
politeness is not formally marked but depends on the context. The following
examples involve a diminutive function with a "polite" meaning, which
typically applies in combinations with the imperative. Due to the lack of a
formal distinction, it is difficult to make a clear-cut distinction between
diminutive and polite function. However, cultural values may well be in
accordance to grammatical structure in this point, as modesty is one feature of
the (unwritten) Urarina code of behaviour. Asking for 'a little' will usually be
understood as a modest and thus polite request. In fact, most examples that
involve the suffix -uri must be seen as applications of the diminutive
functioning as a politeness strategy, whereas the interpretation as velocity in
examples such as (822e) is exceptional and only detectable from the specific
context.
a)
basihti kuak-uri-u
a. while wait-RAP-IMP
'Please wait a little while!'
b)
ka=iri aua-ri-u-tge-ra
1 sg=pet hear=RAP-IMP-PL=EMF
'Please try [to eat] my pet!'
The suffix -rn, which marks the distal form, expresses a directional meaning,
implying that the intended activity will not take place at the present position of
both speaker and listener. For instance, the form lenone-ri-u ('eat'-DSTL-IMP)
'go eat' implies that the listener is not invited to eat at the speaker's place, nor
will the speaker be present at the site of the meal. This automatically excludes
the occurrence of the distal suffix with the verb for 'come', which is in fact
unattested. Further examples are given in (824), all of which imply that the
listener is sent away by the speaker.
a)
kauru raj ere-ni-u=ra
3pl for speak-DSTL-IMP-EMF
'Go talk to them!'
b)
ka=kajßamj muku-ni-u=ra
1 sg=older.sister catch-DSTL-IMP=EMF
'Go catch my older sister!'
Note that a combination of several suffixes to occur before the imperative form
is possible, as illustrated in (825).
eno-a-uri-m-u
enter-CAU 1 -RAP-DSTL-IMP
'Quickly go make him enter!'
A noteworthy factor is that the distal form occurs only with the imperative,
/ o
including hortative forms, but not with any other clause type. This may be
taken as supporting evidence for the assumption that imperatives represent a
special clause type as opposed to declarative and other types of clauses.
The plural form of the imperative is identical to the plural used for 2ps forms
in declarative clauses. It is also used as a politeness marker in both imperative
and declarative clauses (but distinguishable from the plural only by context, cf.
§13.2 on politeness).
a)
amu-ma+kiuaaun-era raj te-u-tge=ra
walk-NOM+create-AG for give-IMP-PL=EMF
'Deliver him to the Creator of Ways!'
68
The distal form is not normally observed with the jussive, but exceptions may apply,
cf.(l)).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Positive imperative 573
b)
kaa kuane temetura-l sim-u-toe=ra
this inside stand.together-PRT sleep-IMP-PL=EMF
'Stand together in this and sleep!'
a) -m-u-toe:
lomaj kalaui ra-ni-u-tQe=ra
PSN son receive-DSTL-IMP-PL=EMF
'Go (PL) get the son of Lomai!'
b) -m-tQu-toe:
h-m-tQu-toe=ra
eat-DSTL-IMP-PL=EMF
'Go (PL) eat it!'
Urarina has a hortative form for singular and plural. These forms function as a
strategy to express self-encouragement, but since English lacks this form, the
translation is ambiguous. I will represent the gloss for lsg hortative as Met me'
and for lpl as 'let's', but it is to be understood that this is in no way related to
the verb for 'let'.
As already mentioned in §5.10.4, the hortative form requires the insertion of
the introducer hoane in clause-initial position. This marker is usually
accompanied by a focus marker, which is in concordance with person and
number marking on the verb (cf. §19 on focus). Thus, hoane=m anticipates a
lsg subject Met me'; hoam=m refers to a lpl/ex subject, and kwane=te is the
form for all other persons, including lpl/du and lpl/in. When no focus marker is
used, (which is possible under certain conditions, cf. (831)), the subject of the
clause can still be recognised from the verb. In addition, the verb receives a
hortative suffix. For lsg, the suffix is -e, which is a special form not otherwise
used for lsg in any verbal paradigm.
a)
kwane ra-e
let's receive-HORT
'Let me get it!' [Said by character who is about to grab an axe]
b)
kwane=na kau kuhwa-ι kiuara-e-ra
let's=FOC:lsg here wait-PRT see-HORT=EMF
'Here I will wait and see' [Said by character who is hiding in order to watch what will
happen]
All lpl forms (inclusive, exclusive, dual) take the same suffixes as in the
declarative mood (also see the table in (855) at the end of this chapter).
Subsequently, the hortative with lpl forms is only indicated through the
introducer, whereas for 1 sg, a double marking for the hortative function (using
the introducer and the verbal suffix) applies.
The hortative can also co-occur with the distal form -ni. The distal marker
precedes the suffix for person, which leads to the following surface forms:
DSTL-lpl/du: -ni +-aka -> -niaka
DSTL-lpl/in: -ni + -akatQe -nit$aat$e
DSTL- lpl/ex: -ni + -akaanu -niakaanu
DSTL-lsg:: -ni + -e -ni
The form for lsg exhibits a peculiarity, as the hortative suffix -e is absorbed by
the distal marker. This corresponds to general phonological regularities in the
language: recall that also the 3ps/E suffix -e is realised as zero when it is
attached to a root that ends with /i/ (cf. §3.4).
In principle, it is also possible to combine the hortative form with negation,
as illustrated in (830a). However, note that these examples are based on
elicitation. A preferred and more elegant way to express the same function is
shown in (830b), where the negative suffix is replaced by the privative form and
followed by the copula with the corresponding person marker.
a)
kwane=ne itg,a-eni-akaanu
let's=FOC:lsg do-NEG-lpl/ex
'Let's not do it!'
b)
ku>ane=ne itQa-elanaala ni-akaanu
let's=FOC:lsg do-PRV be-lpl/ex
'Let's not do it!' [Lit.: 'Let's be without doing it.']
The examples in (831) illustrate the co-occurrence of the hortative with the
distal form. The directional function of the distal expresses the speaker's
intention of moving away from the site of the utterance to a place far from both
participants. The sentence in (831a), for instance, is part of a conversation
between several persons on an expedition, uttered by one man who wants to do
his necessity. It is obvious that this will happen in a good distance from site of
the utterance. The other example follows suit as it implies the action to happen
in a place distant from both speaker and listener.
a)
kwane hauria ahaena-ana ku-m-0=tga
let's first forest-inside go-DSTL:HORT=EMF
'Let me go into the bush first!'
b)
huane=te akauru hoaa-ni-aka=ra
let's=FOC 3pl see-DSTL-lpl/du=EMF
'Let's go to see them!'
In hortative constructions with the lsg form, the use of the introducer is
optional, as the examples in (832) illustrate. The reason for this could be that a
confusion of forms is not possible because the hortative is doubly marked. With
lpl hortative forms, the absence of the introducer is not attested, which is
plausible: without the introducer, the distinction between declarative mood and
command would be neutralised.
a)
d?)aha-u=ne ii letoa-e itQa-i=jie kujßa
come.on-IMP=FOC:lsg 2sg send-HORT do-2ps=SUB so.that
'Come on, let me send you so that you might do it!'
b)
ajane tQU, ka=raaheniane fioau-t huaa-ni-0=tga
yes CRTN lsg=self descend see-DSTL:HORT=EMF
'Yes, I will go down myself and see!'
3ps imperative (or jussive) forms are marked with a special suffix -iße (or -mü
in the traditional language). One difference to 2ps commands is the use of the
plural marker -uru instead of -tg,e. This perfectly corresponds to the difference
in declarative sentences, where -tg,e is used for 2ps and -uru for 3ps. A
difference to the hortative is that the introducer huane is not used with the
jussive, whereas lps forms typically occur with it. The jussive form can be
preceded by suffixes for velocity, causative, and -at$a 'only'; however, these
are attested in elicitation only.
a) Singular:
amu-naa+kioaaun-era te-u-tge=te aka hasasa-mii=tQa
walk-NOM+create-AG give-IMP-PL=FOC 3sg untie-JUSS=EMF
'Deliver him to the Creator of Ways that he may untie him!'
b) Plural:
kwane=te lejhü kari ama-aka-te kwara-kuru-mü
let's=FOC one shell take-lpl/du=FOC see-PL-JUSS
'Let us take one shell so that they (the others) would see it!'
The fact that the jussive form -mil is quite infrequent in the database is due to
the fact that it is being replaced by the innovative form -ijie. While the suffix
-mii is a feature of the traditional language, the younger generation tends to
prefer the suffix -ijie. Both forms are less frequent in use than 2ps imperatives,
but the attested examples imply that the two jussive forms share the same
properties and restrictions. Interestingly, the form -ijie coincides with the
prohibitive form for 2sg, which is composed of a 2ps suffix and a negative
enclitic (cf. (387)). Since the relation between these two forms is less than
straightforward, the origin of the suffix -ijie is not entirely clear.
a)
d$=uhuae tureta-u=te kwara-ijie
2sg=mouth open-IMP=FOC see-JUSS
'Open your mouth so that he may see!'
b)
eresi ka=raj ate kuhwu-a ht-uru-ipe katQa-uru=ra
tomorrow lsg=for fish fish.with.hook-NTR go-PL-JUSS man-PL=EMF
'Let the people go fishing for me tomorrow!'
In one elicited example, a jussive form is attested with the distal marker -ni. In
this case, the suffix -ipe does not surface at all, similar to the combination of
the distal suffix with the lsg hortative -e. However, there is no apparent
phonological reason for the omission of -ijw. It must be assumed that examples
such as the one in (835) are exceptions and possibly the result of elicitation. The
preferred way to express a combination of distal and jussive forms is with a
serial verb construction, such as the one in (834b). Therefore, I conclude that
normally, the combination of distal and imperative forms is restricted to first
and second person commands.
a) Singular:
d$aha-u=te ka=reruhwari-0
come.on-IMP=FOC lsg=replace-HORT
'Come on and replace me!'
c) Plural:
mi hau hetau, hoo, d$aha-u=te lenone-tpaatQe
that because HRS oh! come.on-IMP=FOC eat-lpl/in
Therefore [he said], 'Oh, come on and let's eat!'
A possible analysis for these examples is to assume that they actually consist of
two commands: one given as a direct (2ps) command or invitation to come; the
other as an expression of the hortative which implies a promise or indication of
an action to be performed by the speaker in the presence of the listener. " C o m e "
may well be interpreted in a figurative sense.
69
There also is a derived (non-transparent) form d^aha-ma-u 'come on'-IMP, which
can be employed alternatively.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Prohibitive 579
15.2 Prohibitive
b) With hjauria:
hjauria nahoaaunel kaa enamanaa suuhua kuane ew-i=ße
don't again this young.man heart inside enter-2ps=NEGF
'Don't enter the heart of this young man again!' [NT: Mark 9:25; Command to a
demon]
c) With kwa:
kwa kanakaanu rene turu-1 kanakaanu rerueka-a
don't lpl/ex place arrive-PRT lpl/ex disturb-NTR
'Don't disturb us by coming to our place!' [NT: Matthew 8:29; Demons talking to
Jesus]
All introducers occur with a special kind of marking on the verb. However, the
ways of morphological marking differ from each other, as will become clear
below. All prohibitive forms can take plural marking on the verb. Since this is
indicated by the suffix -t$e, there is ambiguity in that this form can also refer to
a)
ka=raj fwosokoro u-a-u, mhjauria ahka bate-i=jie
lsg=for matches come-CAU 1 -IMP don't 3sg forget-2ps=NEGF
'Bring me matches, and do not forget them!' [In conversation over radio]
b)
mhjauria leotga amuriti-i w-naa kioaauk-i-pe
don't other surpass-PRT be-NOM think-2ps=NEGF
'Don't believe that you are better than others!; [Given as a directive in a sermon]
In the plural, the resulting form is -i-t$£ (or -i-tQe=ne if the verb is in clause-
final position).
a)
mhjauria hauria dada-i-t$e=ne=ra
don't first touch-2ps-PL=NEGF=EMF
'Don't (PL) touch him yet!'
b)
mhjauria hoajtei nahoaaunei netabatakahe-ϊ turu-i-t$e=ne=ra
don't again again be.reduced-PRT arrive-2ps-PL=NEGF=EMF
'Don't arrive reduced in number again!'
Similar to the verb marking for 2ps, with 3ps subjects, the forms of the
paradigm for declarative sentences are employed with the prohibitive. More
exactly, the suffix for 3ps/A is used in this context. As before, the final negative
enclitic =rie is attached to the end of the clause.
a)
mhjauria su-a-ne
don't kill-3ps/A=NEGF
'He ought not to kill it!'
b)
hjauria fwau-1 raj rukuele ra-naa hoaau-ka=ne
don't descend-PRT POSS things receive-INF think-3ps/A=NEGF
'He ought not to consider coming down to take his things!'
Prohibition with the introducer koa involves neutral marking on the verb, as the
examples in (841) illustrate. Even though no examples for 3ps are attested, the
fact that 2ps is not explicitly marked indicates that person marking is
neutralised in this form.
a)
kwa kuruata-sa ti-a
don't two-times give-NTR
'Don't tell it twice!'
b)
kwa ka=su-a i=t$ej biri bi-anu=ne kujßa=ra
don't lsg=kill-NTR 2sg=for piripiri telI-lsg/D=SUB so.that-EMF
'Don't kill me and I show you piripiriV
a)
kwa ka=su-a-tQe=ra, kanu=na hau-naka-ito-o=ra
don't 1 sg=kill-NTR-PL=EMF lsg=FOC:lsg throw-PSB-DER-1 sg/E=EMF
'Don't (PL) kill me; I am not dangerous!'
b)
kwa ubaae-ka-tge
don't be.angry-NTR-PL
'Don't (PL) get angry!'
In the table in (843), the use of different introducers and verbal inflections is
summarised again. One very obvious aspect is that the use of the distal form is
very restricted: neither does it occur in the declarative mood, nor is it attested
with 3ps forms. Its exclusive occurrence is with commands for first and second
person.
With regard to the distinction between declarative and imperative mood, the
division is not clear-cut: In the positive imperative, there is a special marking
for all forms including lsg, but not for lpl forms. 2ps commands have special
verbal inflection for the positive imperative, but not for the prohibitive. The
system is further complicated by the involvement of the neutral form with the
prohibitive introducer hoa.
Verb -e -m — —
-ijie (NEW)
3pl Introducer — — mhjauria —
-Hm-iße (NEW)
70
The root of kulümii is not analysable. However, the ending of the word in -mti
suggests that this is a jussive form.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
584 Imperative
dependent clause, with similar propositions (only if the priest is not killed, he
could arrive).
a)
bute ha-u=te kuane nitQute-i-tge=ne ku\pa=ra
[boat] [make-IMP=FOC] [inside escape-2ps-PL=SUB so.that=EMF]
[Ο] [V] [DEP]
'Build a boat so that you (PL) would escape in it!'
b)
ku-rti-u=te satit kanaanaj-uru raj kulümü
[go-DSTL-IMP=FOC] [all child-PL for let.there.be
[V] ([DEP])
c)
kwa=he batiri su-a-tge=te turu-a u-ipe=ra
[don't=REP] [priest] [kill-NTR-PL=FOC] [arrive-NTR come-JUSS]
[INTR] [Ο] [V] [DEP]
'Don't kill the priest and let him arrive, he says!'
A possible explanation for this structure lies in the nature of the imperative as
an action yet to be accomplished. Whatever is the result of the required action
depends on whether the command is obeyed or not. Instead of using the
declarative form in the dependent clause, Urarina uses a form which implies
that the action still is to be performed. There are two strategies in order to signal
this: imperative forms for first and third person, and a syntactic solution for
second person. The latter is necessary as the addition of another command with
2ps imperative would possibly not indicate the relation between the two actions,
i.e. 'build the boat, enter it!', (which is not a possible construction in Urarina),
would not suffice to mark the consecutive relation between the two clauses.
While the focus marker is employed as in the examples in (844), the same
construction is also found without focus marker, i.e. the purposive/consecutive
nature of the dependent clause is expressed by its peculiar morphological and
syntactic structure and not directly related to the focus marker.
a)
asi-u huara-a=ne hoataa
[hide-IMP] [see-3ps/D=SUB so.that.not]
[V] [DEP]
'Hide it so that he would not see it!'
b)
kanu hjane-ku=tQe lenone-m-0
[lsg] [let-IMP=PLT] [eat-DSTL:HORT]
[Ο] [V] [DEP]
'Let me go so that I eat!'
Note that the consecutive function does not generally apply to all dependent
clauses that follow an imperative. In (846), a conditional clause follows the
imperative.
When the imperative is followed by the enclitic =ni, the command refers to the
near future. More exactly, this form implies 'later today', as shown in (847). In
these examples, the presence of =ni implies a non-immediate command,
however, referring to the same day.
a)
lenone-u-ni
eat-IMP-NDF
'Eat later!' [later today]
b)
las tres ke u-u=m
three.o'clock INST come-IMP=NDF
'Come at three o'clock!' [Implying 'around 3 o'clock', later today]
It is easily noted that the function of =ni in the above examples is in exact
correspondence with the past meaning of this morpheme as the witness enclitic
=ni (cf. §12.3.3). While an evidential function is excluded with the imperative,
the coincidence of the temporal function of this enclitic is obvious. However,
though the form may be closely related, I gloss it as a "non-distant f u t u r e "
( N D F ) form when it follows an imperative. Apart from its match with the
evidential enclitic, =m also is homophonous with the assertive marker (cf.
§12.3.2). Even though in this case, the reference to the future may somehow
coincide with the function of =m in (847), the "non-distant" feature is absent
f r o m the function of the assertive. 71 Yet another homophonous m o r p h e m e is the
distal marker -m, observed with imperatives only. On the one hand, the function
of the distal marker again appears functionally related to the N D F morpheme,
due to its meaning of "not here and now". On the other hand, this m o r p h e m e is
a suffix and occurs in a different position, i.e. before the imperative suffix. It
can even co-occur with the N D F marker, as is evident from (848a). Thus, none
of the homophonous morphemes can be proven to exactly match the functions
of the N D F marker. One could assume that the origin of all four markers may
be related, but that these have developed different functions (and even taken
different positions within the verb) over time.
Apart f r o m its compatibility with the distal form (cf. (848a)), the N D F
marker may also co-occur with strong and weak prohibitive forms, as examples
in (848b,c) illustrate. In contrast, it cannot be combined with hortative and
jussive forms.
(848) Non-distant future marker =ni with distal and prohibitive forms (elicited)
71
Recall that the assertive is only used with the irrealis in order to mark future tense.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Suggestive form 587
When the plural suffix -tg,e is added to the prohibitive forms, the non-distant
future marker is realised as -7, which corresponds to the allomorphy observed
with its homophones as well.
ho a lenord-a-toe=~i
don't eat-NTR-PL=NDF
'Don't (PL) eater later!'
a)
d^atera ubarlti ke ßaara kuhoa-riu
how.about liquor VLI 2pl give.to.drink-RAP-SUG
'How [would it be] if I gave you liquor to drink?!'
b)
d^atera katQa ne-1 d$e=tete-riu=te
how.about man be-PRT 2sg=make-IRR-SUG
'What if I could make you human ... [you could show me how to give birth].'
While for lsg, the suffix -riu is attached to the verb, with 3ps, the jussive forms
-mii or -ipe are suffixed (cf. (851)). Examples with 2ps reference are not
attested. In most examples, the irrealis form of the transitive verb tetia 'make,
put, set' precedes the suggestive suffix to result in the form tete-riu. This can
roughly be translated as Ί would make . . . ' . The use of the jussive in (851) also
has the connotation of ' W h o could do it?' or ' W h o could go to get it?'
respectively.
a)
d^atera itga-mii
how.about do-JUSS
'How if he did it?'
b)
d^atera ra-a ku-ijw
how.about receive-NTR go-JUSS
'What if he went to get it?'
Note that negation is not compatible with the suggestive form. A sentence such
as Ί wish there were no rats' is changed as illustrated in (852), making the
copula a transitive verb (tetia) and using the postposition kulane ' w i t h o u t '
instead of negating the verb. Literally, the sentence means ' H o w if I made [the
place] without rats'.
C o m m a n d s are only marked with verbs. While the inflectional pattern involves
transitive as well as active intransitive, PSC verbs, and intransitivised verbs, it is
unclear at this stage whether stative verbs can be marked for imperative. Note,
however, that the copula is not exempted from imperative inflection.
Though rarely observed in practice, pronouns can occur as a subject in
imperative constructions, similar to declarative clauses. While preverbal as well
as postverbal position is more or less acceptable, the occurrence of a pronoun
before the verb is ambiguous, as this normally is the position of the Ο argument.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Differences between imperative and declarative mood 5 89
a)
ii itQa-u / ii-tga itga-u / (itQa-u ii)
2sg do-IMP / 2sg-only do-IMP / do-IMP 2sg
'You do it!'
b)
ii sim-H j ii-tQa sini-u / (sini-u ii)
2sg sleep-IMP / 2sg-onIy sleep-IMP / sleep-IMP 2sg
'You sleep!'
The presence of suffixes that can precede any imperative marking was already
mentioned in the previous sections. Their occurrence is not limited to the
imperative, but they each have a corresponding function in the declarative
mood. The diminutive -uri may deviate from this in that its use with the
imperative almost always implies a politeness, while this is not the case when it
occurs with declarative clauses.
In opposition to number and person, other grammatical categories are
unmarked in the imperative. This includes tense, aspect, evidentiality, and
various other features, which are summarised in (854). Furthermore, a
distinction between inflection types, such as in the declarative mood (cf.
§12.2.16) is not made in the imperative mood.
72
While the syntactic peculiarity mentioned here is exceptional, it must be noted that
otherwise, imperative clauses follow the same syntactic rules as declarative clauses.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
590 Imperative
II
II
(855) Person marking on verb - comparison between imperative and declarative mood
-iße (NEW)
3pl -HTH-mn (OLD) -uru-a 1 -ure -Hru-ij-HrH-ene ? —
-uru-iße (NEW)
Valency changes in Urarina are marked by suffixes on the verb. §16.1 describes
a verbal derivation with passive function. However, more correctly, the
morpheme under investigation can be described as a nominaliser. Another form
with valency-decreasing properties is the prefix ne-, which functions as a
general intransitiviser (cf. §16.2). This morpheme may also take reflexive
meaning under certain conditions, especially when co-occurring with the adverb
raahemane 'self. §16.3 describes the reciprocal form, which uses the particle
ita. The functions of two causative forms previously discussed in §12.2.1 and
§12.2.2 are investigated in §16.4. They differ from each other in terms of
transitivity features, productivity and (partly) in function, as direct vs. indirect
causation are distinguished. When an additional argument occurs as a result of
increased valency, it is followed by the postposition he, as investigated in §16.5.
16.1 Passive
73
The labial glide in -nohzoi results from vowel copying of /o/, which is another
automatic phonological rule (cf. §2.8.3).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
594 Valency changing mechanisms
T h e examples in (857) provide further evidence for the assumption that the
form -noi is in fact an instance of nominalisation: in these sentences, the passive
suffix is followed by the plural marker -uru, which also occurs with the
nominaliser -i (cf. §6.6.1). Even though the plural marker is optional, its
presence strongly suggests that -noi is a nominaliser.
a)
rüi baja, ßäe ni-a itulere rukuele, ho at a kahe itQa-noi-kuru=ne
[that after] [already be-3ps/D all.kinds things] [iron from make-PASS-PL=SUB
[CNJ] [Main] [DEP1]
b)
amia-rate-noi-tQuru katQa-urn=te ena ita kuruatahane-ure
[work-CAU2-PASS-PL man-PL=FOC] [now] [REC help-3pl/E]
[A] [ADV] [V]
'The people who had been forced to work now help each other.'
respectively (cf. §12). One example for this is also shown in (857b). In this
case, the passive has scope over the causative. On the semantic level, there are
no apparent restrictions as to which verbs can be combined with -noi. Attested
examples cover a variety of semantic types, including the verb for 'have', siiria
(cf. (858)).
a)
neleere mi mi-tea su-nohwi ate
[become.big:3ps/E] [that that-only kill-PASS fish]
[V] [S]
'The fish that he had killed became big.' [Pangayacu dialect]
b)
ii-tQa siiri- floi maraka ne-~t=ßa
[2sg-only have-PASS brand] [be-PRT=INT]
[CC] [V]
'[Should I buy a watch] being the same brand as you have?' [Lit. 'as owned by you']
Note that -noi can also function as head of an NP, as illustrated in (859).
However, its use with modifying function is more commonly attested in the
database.
While the passive marker can be preceded by the causative suffixes of slot 1
and 2, respectively, no verbal suffixes can follow -not. This is conceivable in so
far as the passiviser is analysed as an instance of nominalisation, i.e. as a noun.
Therefore, in order to indicate person, number and other grammatical
categories, -mi is followed by the copula with an auxiliary function, ma, which
is attached to the passivised verb as a clitic (also cf. §9.6.6). The examples in
(860) show that person and polarity are marked as suffixes on the auxiliary. In
the same way, clitics such as the remoteness marker are attached to the
auxiliary, rather than to -mi.
There is one reason to believe that the copula is cliticised to the passive rather
than functioning as a separate word in this context: the initial nasal of the
copula is subject to palatalisation after the final /if of the passive form. This
corresponds to the effect a final vowel /i/ of any word has on enclitics that begin
with a nasal. However, the initial nasal of a word is not subject to this
alternation. If the copular auxiliary had word status, palatalisation of its initial
nasal should not occur. Therefore, the copula can be regarded as a special kind
of clitic, which is typically followed by inflectional suffixes (cf. §2.11).
The examples in (860) have illustrated the use of the passive form in
combination with the auxiliary, through which the complex of verbal stem,
passive marker and cliticised auxiliary with inflectional suffixes seems to
function like any other verb. Note that many suffixes that potentially occur on
most verbs are not attested with the auxiliary attached to a passive form. It is
unclear whether this is the result of systematic exclusion or simply due to the
fact that this form is relatively rare. In fact, the most common use is with
person, negation, and tense markers, or with the participle marked on the
auxiliary. The latter is shown in (861), where the entire combination of
passivised verb and auxiliary represents a participle clause (cf. §20.3). In this
case, person and other grammatical features are expressed on the verb of the
main clause. (861a) illustrates third person marking (Ε-form) on the free copula
ne 'it is', while the passive form on 'buy' is followed by the copular auxiliary
marked with the participle suffix, literally meaning 'being bought'. A similar
example is given in (861b), where an inflected form o f ' r u n ' represents the main
verb, while 'being called' functions as a participle.
a)
aj, ßäe kurete-noi=jie-i=te ne nii ii-tga
yes [already] [buy-PASS=be-PRT=FOCbe:3ps/E] [that 2sg-only
[ADV] [V] [S]
baha-ur-i
ask-PL-NOMobj]
'Yes, what you had requested already has been bought.' [Lit. 'it is being bought']
b)
mi=te kat^a kutia-mhzui-jie-l ajßa amunei ... suru-e
[that=FOC] [man call-PASS=be-PRT with as.if] [run-3ps/E]
[S] [DEP] [V]
'That [girl], as if called by some man, ran (away).' [Lit. 'as if with [the state of] being
called']
Another important question regards the role of the arguments within a passive
construction. Normally, a formal passive involves the decrease of verb valency
as its object (O) takes the function of the subject while the subject (A) is shifted
into the periphery of the clause (if surfacing at all). In Urarina, it is very
a)
mtahi-a ku-re=i, kana+kioaattn-era kaseteka-wi=jx-i
[be.lost-NTR go-IRR:3ps/E=ASS] [lpl/in+create-AG punish-PASS=be-PRT]
[V] [DEP]
'He will be lost, punished by God.' [NT: John 3:36]
b)
ni-a kann komasaj nuta itQa-noi=/>e~i=tg,a
[be-3ps/A] [lsg wife] [eye make-PASS=be-PRT=EMF]
[V] [S] [DEP]
Ί have a very beautiful wife.' [Lit. "made by eye"; idiomatic expression]
In the following example, the original object (i.e. the original Ο = S of the
passivised clause) is present, in focus (= initial) position. Thus, one may assume
that the presence of a subject does not play a significant role for the fact that the
external argument is unmarked. Indeed, one may conclude that this is the
regular strategy to represent a passivised clause.
There are more examples in which the original agent occurs before a passivised
verb, again without any formal marking. In (864a), the passivised form of
' w a n t ' is preceded by the original agent ( ' G o d ' ) and in (864b), this position is
filled by a pronoun. Most interestingly, in (864c), a proclitic takes the same
function. These examples could be instances of lexicalisation, which would be
plausible since ' G o d ' s will' (864a) and the idiom in (864c) are frequently used
expressions.
a)
nijej kana+huaaun-era here-noi itQa-i
[not.at.all] [lpl/in+create-AG want-PASS] [do-NEG:3ps/A]
[ADV] [Ο] [V]
'He does not do at all what is wanted by God.'
b)
kanu here-noi
lsg want-PASS
'my will' [Lit. 'what is wanted by me']
c)
k=itQa-noi
1 sg=make-PASS
'my work' [Lit. 'what I do']
The general meaning of the passive in discourse is not entirely clear, but
typically, it may be chosen when the agent of a clause is unknown.
In §9.3, intransitivised verbs are listed as a separate verb type. This seems
justified as the productivity of the intransitiviser ne- is limited. This prefix is
found on transitive verbs only, some of which are listed in (866). Its meaning
can be described as a general intransitiviser, as reflexivity is not its primary
function. In particular, the semantic structure of verbs derived with ne- is not
predictable. For instance, in the intransitivised for 'suffer' (nekajriteaa, derived
from kajritQaa 'make suffer'), the subject has the semantic role of a patient; in
mmitQua 'get up' (derived from mitQua 'set up'), the subject represents an
agent. In semantic terms, the S argument of the two examples plays an active
role in one case, but a passive role in the other. A reflexive interpretation does
not apply in either case. However, with some other examples, the reading '(by)
himself or '(by) itself is possible, which in fact implies a reflexive function.
This can be emphasised by the use of raaheniane ' s e l f , as will be investigated
in §16.2.2. It should also be mentioned that there is a possible diachronic
relation between ne- and the 3ps object proclitic ne=, as described in §5.5.
Even though there is a relatively large number of verbs that contain the prefix
ne- (about 160 in the lexical database), the intransitiviser is not 100%
productive. In many examples, the preflxation of ne- comes along with
unpredictable morpho-phonological changes; in some, the base verb cannot be
determined. In the examples in (867), a connection between the transitive and
the resulting intransitive form can still be recognised even though some changes
take place in the base verb. Some other verbs, as depicted in (868), appear to
inherently occur with the prefix, i.e. there is no attested transitive form for
these.
b) Intransitivised verb:
ita kuruatahane-l ena ne-rela-kure amiane-naa ke
[REC help-PRT] [now] [ITR-instruct-3pl/E] [work-NOM VLI]
[DEP] [ADV] [V] [Ε]
'Helping each other, they now learn to work.' [Lit. 'they learn in working']
a)
ne-kulehe-u
ITR-wash-IMP
'Wash yourself!'
b)
ne-sau-ri-teau=rti
ITR-cut-IRR-1 sg/A=ASS
Ί will cut myself.'
However, for most verbs, this function cannot be applied, as shown in (871),
where the verb has clearly intransitive status, but no reflexive meaning. Thus,
the interpretation as A = 0 is less feasible. While example (871a) might still be
interpreted as 'the arm broke itself, which would again suggest reflexivity, this
reading is not applicable in (871b) where a translation as 'we see ourselves'
does not correspond to the actual meaning. The function of ne- in this example
may therefore be described as anticausative.
a)
ne-fioaao-ka kamt bihi
[ITR-break-3ps/A] [lsg arm]
[V] [S]
Ί broke my arm.' [Lit. 'My arm broke.']
b)
katpa ne-ι ni-akaanu natii=jia enejtQu ne-1 ne-huara-kaanu
[man be-PRT be-lpl/ex although=FOC: 1 pi] [monkey be-PRT] [ITR-see-lpl/ex]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V]
'Even though we are people, we look like monkeys.' [Lit. 'we seem monkeys']
If one looks at other verbs listed in (866) and (867), a reflexive interpretation
would be possible in some cases. While some verbs might imply that the subject
is involved in performing the action, the subject does play an active part, but is
actually subject to the change without having active influence on the event. For
the three verbs in (872a), an active part may be assumed for the subject,
whereas the majority of verbs with ne- (cf. (872b)) do not allow this reading.
These are rather to be interpreted intransitively, i.e. roughly translated as 'by
itself.
In the same way as other verbs, verbs that are intransitivised by ne- can receive
a new argument that refers to an instrument or a goal (cf. §16.5). Note that the
verbs for 'buy' and 'sell' are based on hiria 'change': hire-tia 'buy' is
composed of 'change and 'give', and in turn, ne-kuretia 'sell' is the
intransitivised form of 'buy'. As illustrated in (873), the new argument, here
corresponding to "Goal", is marked with ke. This may be somewhat
counterintuitive, since ke would not occur with the underived (transitive) base
verb. For instance, the Ο argument of kuretia 'buy' does not take the
postposition, whereas the same NP must be accompanied by the valency
increaser when occurring with 'sell' (cf. (873a)). This is entirely due to the fact
that 'sell' is intransitive and any additional argument must be marked by ke.
a)
uu-re=i rukuele ke ne-kurete-nakauru
[come-IRR:3ps/E=ASS] [things VLI ITR-buy-those.who]
[V] [S]
'The traders will come.'
b)
d$a ke=te ne-laate-re
[what VLI=FOC] [ITR-need-IRR:3ps/E]
[PP] [V]
'What use would it have?' [Lit. 'what would it be necessary for?]
Other functions than goal are relatively rare with this construction. In (874a),
the instrumental function is exemplified with the verb for 'function/move',
which, however, is lexicalised as no transitive form is attested, i.e. it is only
Urarina also has a lexical strategy to refer to ' s e l f : the word raahernane, which
can be characterised as an adverb, is employed in autoreflexive function to refer
to ' s e l f . Its position within the sentence is relatively free, but in all attested
examples it refers to the subject of the clause.
a) Initial position:
raahernane jwau-Ί kwara-a ku-e
[self descend-PRT] [see-NTR go-3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'He climbed down and went to see for himself.'
c) Final position:
jioaelu ne-nakauru hit ς, ana ha-uru-a nerajfie raaheniane
[earlier be-those.who] [blowgun] [make-PL-3ps/D must] [self]
[Α] [Ο] [V] [ADV]
'Those who lived earlier had to make blowguns themselves.'
a)
turu-uru-a=ne hana hetau, raaheniane ne-huuraka-e
[arrive-PL-3ps/D=SUB when HRS] [self] [ITR-open-3ps/E]
[DEP] [ADV] [V]
'When they arrived, it [the gate] opened by itself.' [NT: Acts 12:10]
b)
raj esefioara rukuit-e, raaheniane ne-su-1
[POSS sword] [pull.out-3ps/E] [self] [ITR-kill-PRT]
[Ο] [V] [ADV] [DEP1]
m-hjau-a=ne kujßa
[ITR-throw-3ps/D=SUB so.that]
[DEP2]
'He pulled his sword in order to kill himself.' [NT: Acts 16:27] [Lit. "in order to throw
himself away, killing himself']
It can be concluded that the principal function of the intransitiviser rte- is not of
a reflexive nature. This meaning is only applicable with a minority of
intransitivised verbs. With most other verbs, the prefix functions as a general
intransitiviser without a specifically predictable meaning.
The reciprocal is formed by the particle ita to express 'each other'. It only
occurs with the plural form of verbs and is only found with transitive verbs.
(877) Reciprocal it a
a)
hauna he hetau=te nii ita fiuaru-rehete-kure=lu
[bamboo.stick INST HRS=FOC] [that REC] [cut-HABl-3pl/E=REM]
[PP] [O] [V]
'They used to cut each other with a bamboo stick.'
b)
ita he kana suuhua akate-i m-aka=ne=te here,
[REC VLI lpl/in heart defend-PRT] [be-lpl/du=SUB=FOC] [want:3ps/E]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V]
The reciprocal particle can also be used as preceding postpositions such as ajßa
'with' and raj 'for', as is illustrated in (878a,b). With the verb rihia 'be like',
ita is employed to mean 'each in the same way' (cf. (878c)).
a) With ajßa\
jietononei ita beela-ι ita ajßa rautohive-Ί kana suuhua auna-1
[always REC love-PRT] [REC with be.calm-PRT lpl/in heart hear-PRT]
[DEP1] [DEP2]
'... always loving each other, being peaceful with each other and listening to our hearts
b) With raj:
ita raj lenone te-ure
[REC for] [food] [give-3pl/E]
[PP] [Ο] [V]
'They gave food to each other.'
c) With rihihel:
amiam-akaanu ita rihihel
[work-lpl/ex] [REC like]
[V] [PP]
'We each worked the same [amount].'
The reciprocal ita may also occur in comparative constructions that express
equality, as was mentioned in §5.4.6.
16.4 Causative
Urarina has two suffixes that mark causative, -erate and -a, which are used with
verbs of different transitivity classes. The major difference in the function of the
two suffixes regards the direct vs. indirect involvement of the causer, as will
become evident in §16.4.3. An interesting aspect is that both suffixes can occur
in combination, which typically refers to a delegated task and involves an
additional participant.
The form -erate (and allomorphs) is a common and productive morpheme that
increases the valency of a verb. It can be attached to almost any verb, which
includes transitive and active intransitive verbs, as well as some colour and
stative verbs (in elicitation only). The suffix is also observed with verbs that
contain the general intransitiviser Tie- (cf. §16.2). Furthermore, -erate can be
suffixed to the transitive verbs for 'eat' and 'drink' (ha and kua, respectively),
but does not occur with the intransitive lenoma 'eat', neither with the copula
ma. In (879), examples for the occurrence of -erate with different verb types is
given. The suffix occurs in verbal slot 2 and can be followed by almost any
suffix (with only a few unattested, but likely to be possible combinations, cf.
§12.2.2).
With stative verbs, the formation of a causative is uncommon and not attested in
natural text. However, speakers produced causativised forms of some stative
verbs in elicitation. Based on the fact that no examples are found in spontaneous
speech or other texts, one may conclude that stative verbs do not normally take
the causative suffix.
(880) Elicited causative forms for stative verbs and colour verbs
- When the final root vowel is /«/, it is reduced to a velar glide before the
causative suffix: This is illustrated by the forms amu-a 'walk' -> amu-eratia
'make walk' and eru-a 'meet' eru-eratia 'make meet'.
- When the final root vowel is /u/, it is reduced to a labial glide in some verbs
before a causative suffix follows, such as in suru-a 'run' suriu-eratia
'make run'. However, this does not apply to all verbs of this shape:
ajto-a 'say' ajto-ratia 'make say' is an exception.
Similar to the causative formation of ajto-a 'say', there are a number of cases
where not the verb root itself is modified, but the suffix undergoes certain
changes:
- When the root that precedes ends in a long vowel or in vowel sequence, the
causative marker is realised as -rate, such as in kuaau-ka 'think'
hoaau-ratia 'make think' and ehoo-ka 'appear' -> ehoo-ratia 'make appear'.
- When the root that precedes ends in the vowel / i f , or in a diphthong ending
with a palatal glide, the causative marker is realised as -tQate, as exemplified
by ki-a 'eat' Ιά-tQatia 'make eat' (rare form as there is a suppletive form
for 'feed' as well) and beelaj-a 'give as a gift', love' -> beelaj-tQatia 'make
give as a gift, cause to love'.
In addition to these rules, there are some exceptions and irregular forms. These
include halaito-a 'make a hole' - halaito-rzuatia 'let make a hole', hau-a
'throw' - hwa-eratia 'make throw', and hwau-a 'descend' - hana-eratia 'make
descend'. The last two examples are based on an alternation involving the
change of initial / h w / to /hau/ and vice versa, which, however, is observed with
these two verbs only. The verb amiam-a 'work' has the irregular causative form
amia-ratia 'make work'.
With any causative, a change in the argument structure is always involved,
as the valency of the verb is increased by one argument. With intransitive verbs,
the new argument (i.e. the causer) becomes A, while the old S argument
becomes O. As could be expected, this is expressed by a change in constituent
order in Urarina, as exemplified below.
b) Causativised clause:
kanaanaj-uru amia-rati-a katga
[child-PL] [work-CAU2-3ps/A] [man]
[Ο] [V] [A]
'The man made the children work.'
a)
Transitive clause:
leotQa amiane-naa itQa-käu kanu
[other work-NOM] [do-lsg/A] [lsg]
[O] [V] [A]
Ί did other works.'
Causativised clause:
leot^a amiane-naa itQa-rati-a kanu ke
[other work-NOM] [do-CAU2-3ps/A] [lsg VLI]
[Ο] [V] [E]
'He made me do other works.'
b)
Transitive clause:
amiane-1, itulere itga-ure kaa katQa-uru
[work-PRT] [all.kinds] [do-3pI/E] [this man-PL]
[DEP] [Ο] [V] [A]
'Working, these people did all kinds of things.'
Causativised clause:
kaa katga-uru amia-rate-1, akauru ke itulere itga-rate
[this man-PL] [work-CAU2-PRT] [3pl VLI] [all.kinds] [do-CAU2:3ps/E]
[Ol] [VI] [E2] [02] [V2]
'He made these people work and made them do all kinds of things.'
It is quite rare to see all arguments to appear as full NPs. In (883a), the object of
the causativised verb does not surface, as it is understood as a 3ps object 'it';
thus, only the external argument (= the former A) surfaces and is marked by he.
In (883b), the external argument is not stated, i.e. the causee remains
unspecified. In this example, the " n e w " subject shows up in focus position, at
the beginning of the sentence.
a)
mi häu=te kujßadera-1 ari-tQate
[that because=FOC] [be.worried-PRT] [seek-CAU2:3ps/E]
[CNJ] [DEP] [V]
'Therefore, he [the father] had her [the child] sought [by the people].'
b)
na-i hetau rela-erate-naha-e
[say-PRT HRS] [teach-CAU2-PLO-3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'Saying so, he [the priest] had them [the people] taught [by his novice].'
There are some examples in which the valency increase marker ke surfaces in a
causative construction without being accompanied by an overt N P . While it can
be present optionally in order to refer to the Ε argument (i.e. the "old" agent), it
is not obligatory in this context. In fact, there are three options in order to
represent the same content, possibly with different degrees of emphasis on the
argument in question. In (885a), ke is entirely optional, but it can also be
accompanied by the 3ps pronoun, as shown in (885b). The pragmatic
differences of these different versions are unclear, but it seems that the presence
of ke alone or ke plus pronoun is rather unusual.
a)
(ke) kutia-rate-kure katQa-uru
[(VLI)] [call-CAU2-3pl/E] [man-PL]
[Ε] [V] [A]
'The people made him call her [his wife].'
b)
(aka ke) kutia-rate-kure katQa-uru
[(3sg VLI)] [call-CAU2-3pl/E] [man-PL]
[Ε] [V] [A]
'The people made him call her [his wife].'
Since Urarina does not have ditransitive verbs, examples such as tia ' g i v e '
behave in the same way as other transitive verbs would do with the causative:
the object remains in position, the "old" agent is marked by ke (if present), and
the recipient is followed by the postposition raj, as it is in the transitive clause.
Recall that a possible translation for tia is 'provide', rather than ' g i v e ' , which
illustrates its argument structure in a more understandable way in English. Also
note that none of the N P s in (886) is obligatory.
Regarding the constituent order in sentences where many NPs surface, there
appears to be only one preference: an Ε argument or a recipient typically is in
the periphery, i.e. it does not commonly occur between verb and object or verb
and subject (for exceptions see §18.4). There is no restriction as to whether a
peripheral argument occurs before or after the verb. In (886), the Ε argument is
found in initial position, as it is marked with a focus marker. The focus marker
is not obligatory in order to have Ε in this position, as is shown by (882b) and
(883a), among others. Alternatively, the ke-phrase can also occur in postverbal
position (cf. (882a).
From a semantic perspective, the causative form -erate can refer to a wide
range of meanings. The caused action may be forceful or voluntary. The causer
may be of non-human character, such as in 'this (situation) is going to make us
relax', talking about a certain work. Most typically, if the causer is specified, he
or she will trigger the action verbally, but not be directly involved with the
performed action.
Example (882b), which refers to the way patrones enslaved the Urarina,
clearly describes a forceful cause that results in the people's working. It can be
assumed that the force in most cases was not by direct physical contact (even
though possible), but through verbal threats. The same type of force can also be
interpreted for examples (879a,b) and various others. In (879c), however, the
caused action is voluntary and implies that healing is achieved by supernatural
power; obviously the patient wants to be healed. In other examples, such as
(883a), it is understood that the agent asks his wife to perform the action, which
would not involve any force. Similarly, in (885), the described situation makes
it evident that the people persuaded the man to call his wife, which does not
involve force. All examples have in common that the causer is not directly
involved in the action to be performed. In summary, it must be said that the
semantic interpretation of the causative is context-dependent. It always focuses
on the fact that the causer does not conduct the action himself, but delegates
others to do it.
Urarina has another causative suffix, -a, which is less productive than -erate.
Besides, it can be attached to intransitive verbs only. In (887), I give a selection
of verbs that are attested for their occurrence with -a. Some of them involve
alternations which are not normally predictable from the phonological structure
of the verb root. For instance, some verbs whose root ends in /«/ or /u/ lose the
final root vowel before -a is suffixed (cf. (887b). Verb roots that end in /ni/ are
modified to result in final /JT/ before -a (cf. (887c)), and there are two examples
for which the causative suffix is -la instead of -a (cf. (887d)).
i) Suffixation of -la:
ahi-a 'get drunk' ahe-la-a [ahelaa] 'make drunk'
eri-a 'speak' erela-a [erelaa] 'make speak'
The relatively strong variation in these alternations plus the low number of
attested examples may imply a highly lexicalised status of the causative suffix
-a. This is also supported by forms such as the example hanoaa 'give birth' (Lit.
'make light'), as the semantic relation between 'clear up' and 'give birth' is not
In addition to these verbs, there is a verb for 'feed' that is not morphologically
related to any verb for 'eat'. While the meaning of initial part of hiraatia 'feed /
give to eat' is unknown, the second parts corresponds to the verb for 'give'
(tia).
The argument structure of verbs causativised with -a corresponds to those
that carry the suffix -erate: the new argument (causer) becomes A, whereas the
old S argument shifts into Ο position. Since the resulting clause does not exceed
the "regular" valency of two participants, the use of the postposition ke is not
required.
16.4.3 Differences between the two causative forms and their combination
There is one significant aspect by which the function of the causative markers
-a and -erate can be distinguished. The form containing -a implies "direct
personal involvement" of the causer, while -erate points at "indirect" cause, i.e.
the causer sends someone else to give the order for the action. For instance, the
verb tur-a-a is translated as 'make arrive' and implies that the subject (A)
himself'makes arrive' the respective O. In contrast, the form turu-erati-a states
that A has someone arrive by giving the respective command to a third person,
i.e. 'he has him come'. However, there is one complication involved: it is not
uncommon to find the two causative suffixes in a sequence, occurring on the
same verb. Typically, such a form is also interpreted as 'having someone else
command somebody to do something'. This is exemplified in (890): while it is
evident that the form in (890b) implies the direct involvement of the causer, the
combination of both suffixes as in (890c) implies that the causer put someone
else in the position to make the man enter. The semantic concept to which this
double causative refers may be tagged 'indirect causation'.
a) Intransitive:
eno-a / u-a
enter-3ps/A come-3ps/A
'He entered.' 'He came.'
b) Causative -a:
katQa eno-a-a / katga u-a-a
man enter-CAUl-3ps/A man come-CAUl-3ps/A
'He (himself) made the man enter.' 'He (himself) made the man come.'
a)
karesero kuane hwäa eno-a-erate=lu, kadena he
[prison inside] [PSN] [enter-CAU l-CAU2:3ps/E=REM] [chain VLI
[PP] [Ο] [V] [DEP]
itQuarate-1 herodesi
bind-PRT] [PSN]
[A]
'Herod had John bound with chains and had him sent to prison.' [NT: Matthew 14:3]
b)
goberenadoro fioerisi rem fwaboro turu-a-erate hetau
[governor PSN place] [PSN] [arrive-CAUl-CAU2:3ps/E HRS]
[LOC] [Ο] [V]
mi komäadäati
[that commander]
[A]
'That commander had Paul arrive at Felix's place.' [NT: Acts 23:24]
komäadäati he
[commander VLI]
[E]
(To mean): 'Herod made the commander send John to prison.'
a) Indirect causation:
akarto h-tgati-a
[snake] [eat-CAU2-3ps/A]
[O] [V]
'He made them eat snake.' [Context: he had someone give the dead snake to the
chicken.]
b) Direct causation:
kana-atga ki-ji ki-tQati-a
[ 1 pl/in-only eat-NOM0bj] [eat-CAU2-3ps/A]
[O] [V]
'He made [us] eat what we don't [normally] eat.' [Context: He (himself) gave us canned
beef.]
The table in (894) summarises the differences between the two causative
morphemes according to parameters suggested by Dixon (2000:62). It becomes
evident that Urarina distinguishes just between four of the nine criteria, which
involve state/action, transitivity, control, and directness.
An alternative way to express causativity is by the use of the verb letoaa ' s e n d ' ,
which may imply an order, depending on the context. The structure of the
examples in (895) involves ' s e n d ' used with a subordinate clause with the
consecutive conjunction 'so that'. Since no morphological evidence for
causativity is present, this kind of construction may be called "syntactic
causativity". Semantically, this construction implies a non-direct involvement
of the causer.
a)
kanu=na letoa-ü lenone enoala-a=ne kujyia
lsg=FOC:lsg send-lsg/E food cook-3ps/D=SUB so.that
Ί sent [someone] to cook a meal.'
b)
eene letoa-anu lenone enoala-a=ne kujßa
woman send-lsg/A food cook-3ps/D=SUB so.that
Ί sent the woman to cook a meal.'
b) With'live':
leotQa itQau-naa ke itpau-uru-a
[other live-NOM VLI] [live-PL-3ps/A]
[Ε] [V]
'They lived a different life.'
ne-ur-ene
be-PL-NEG:3ps/E]
'They are not giving each of them names like that.'
However, the insertion of ke can also imply other functions than the one
described above. There are examples for a range of different usages that cover
location, comitative, instrumental, and temporal functions. The major question
that arises from this is, what is the difference between an additional NP marked
with ke as compared to a NP marked by other postpositions? In fact, all
functions implied by ke in the examples in (897) to (900) are already covered by
existing locational postpositions (cf. §5.7.1), as indicated for some of the verbs
(cf. (897b,d)). As a possible interpretation, the use of ke expresses a more direct
"impact" of the verb with regard to the NP, which is to say that, for instance in
(897a), refers to the tree more as a goal, as opposed to the shed, where the PP
with asae functions as an adjunct. If this were correct, the function of ke as
introducing a new argument with close semantic relation to the verb would be
conceivable. In (897c,d), the key difference between the two forms of urinating
can be described by the context: when a goal is aimed at, as in the case of
'urinate on this earth' (which could easily be replaced by a situation such as
'urinate on a flower'), ke is used; in contrast, a postposition such as htane
'inside' is preferred in order to express the unintentional character of the action.
In fact, is not specified whether this PP should be translated as locational or
directional ('into them' vs. 'inside them').
naaohwa-l=te ke nesaritQaete-kure=lu
[ENUM-PRT=FOC] [INST] [hunt-3pl/E=REM]
[DEP3] [Ρ] [V]
'Making their blowguns and their bows all that themselves, they hunted with them.'
In a few cases, ke may also take comitative function, as illustrated with the
transitive verb hasisia ' m i x ' in (899a). In (899b), the noun for ' w i f e ' is turned
into an intransitive verb ('have a wife') through the verbaliser -ki. In order to
express with whom the protagonist of the story is married, the person is marked
with ke. However, in both examples of (899), the use of ke could also be
interpreted as a type of instrumental function.
a)
seboja ke hasiite-l ki-a lura+kuturi=jK kujjia
[onion VLI] [mix-PRT] [eat-3ps/D] [bald-head=SUB] [so.that]
[Ρ] [VI] [V2] [A] [CNJ]
'... mixing it with onions so that the bald one may eat it'
b)
ra'-a hetau lejhii kat$a lomaj beene ke komasaj-ki-1 tie-ma
[be-3ps/A HRS] [one man] [PSN female VLI] [wife-VBL-PRT be-NOM]
[VI] [SI] [P2] [V2]
'There was one man who had a wife [called] Lomai.' [Lit. 'who was "be-wifed" with a
wife Lomai']
Note that ke cannot occur twice in a clause, i.e. in hypothetical examples that
have more arguments than ke could introduce, other postpositions would be used
to add additional constituents. A further aspect worth mentioning is that ke is
also used with nominalisations, as shown in (901). The word for 'story' is based
on the intransitive verb for 'speak', derived by the nominaliser -naa (cf. §6.6.3).
Subsequently, the NP 'about X' takes the valency increaser ke.
hauiße-naa ke ere-naa
[get.lost-NOM VLI] [speak-NOM]
[PP] [NOM]
'Story of a lost one'
The instrumental function of ke can also apply in clauses that involve transitive
verbs. Its meaning with these can be instrumental or refer to goal.
a) With 'make':
satu enamanaa-knru=te kam kuruatahane-re=l iglesia it$a-naa
[all young.man-PL=FOC] [lpl/in] [help-IRR:3ps/E=ASS] [church make-NOM
[Α] [Ο] [V] [PP]
ke
VLI]
'All the young people will help us (with) building the church.'
b) With 'instruct/teach':
kanaanaj hanoa-naa ke eerie rela-a kati=jie
[child give.birth-NOM VLI] [woman] [teach-3ps/D] [black.monkey=CND]
[PP] [Ο] [V] [A]
'How the black monkey instructed the woman in giving birth to a child'
c) With 'call/invite':
lejhii kat$a=te miirjka ke katga-uru kuti-hjal amia-rate
[one man=FOC] [minga VLI] [man-PL] [call-PRT work.CAU2:3ps/E]
[A] [PP] [Ο] [V]
O n e man invited the people to a minga [working session] and made them work.'
d) With 'fish':
nehouuri+ofwa ke hetau=te ate kuhiuu-ttre
[garabata+thorn INST HRS=FOC] [fish] [fish-3pl/E]
[PP] [O] [V]
'They caught fish with the thorn of the garabata tree.'
e) With 'touch':
enua ra-ι ke dada-i hoara-ü
[tree] [receive-PRT] [INST] [touch-PRT] [see-lsg/E]
[Ol] [VI] [P2] [V2] [V3]
'Taking a stick and touching him with it, I looked at him [at the jaguar].'
In (903e), all three verbs of the sentence are transitive; the postposition ke adds
a phrase with instrumental function to the verb dadaa 'touch' to imply 'with it',
in addition to the (not overtly present) Ο argument 'him'.
In summary, the valency increase marker ke can be used with different
semantic functions that include reference to instrument, goal, location, time and
comitative function. The main difficulty is to distinguish between additional
arguments, for which ke is also employed in causative constructions, and
adjuncts. As no formal criteria can be applied to this, the interpretation is not
predictable without the context. Apart from that, not all semantic functions of ke
are attested with both transitive and intransitive verbs, but this disparity might
be coincidental. At any rate, the type of noun that is accompanied by ke, plus the
context in which it is used is relevant for the function of ke.
constructions that involve more than verb. Given that Urarina SVCs exhibit a
number of untypical properties not normally predicted for this construction
type, the summary in §17.5 discusses the question in what way these deviate
from the typological criteria for SVCs according to Aikhenvald (2005).
17.1 Properties of VI
The first verb in a SVC comes from an open class. (904) lists examples in
which VI is either transitive or intransitive. 74 Stative verbs of any kind do not
occur in this position, but the copula can function as VI as well (cf. (904c)). As
an important feature, all suffixes marked on VI have scope over this verb only,
rather than over the entire SVC.
a) Transitive VI:
obaa-hei hetau, alau hoara-a ku-e mi unee
get.angry-PRT HRS spider.monkey [see-NTR go-3ps/E] that kinkajou
'The kinkajou got angry and went to see the spider monkey.'
b) Intransitive VI:
mi rihihet ku-he-t, ßäe kahia turu-a u-akaanu=lu
that like go-CNT-PRT already here [arrive-NTR come-lpl/ex=REM]
'Going like that, we arrived here'
c) Copula:
kuraanaa m-a=te u-e
chief [be-NTR=FOC come-3ps/E]
'He came to be chief.'
The above examples illustrate that VI does not bear any inflectional suffixes;
the neutral suffix -a cannot be regarded as such as it does not specify person,
aspect or any other grammatical features. However, it can be attached to a verb
stem, i.e. to a root with certain verbal suffixes. Examples for this are illustrated
in (905), where the causative suffixes -a and -erate precede the neutral marker.
74
For clarity, all SVCs in this chapter are marked by square brackets.
b) Causative -a:
ßaara=te kann reue kaa katga turu-a-a u-i-tge
2pl=FOC lsg place this man [arrive-CAUl-NTR come-2ps-PL]
'You have come to bring this man to my place.' [NT: Luke 23:14]
It should be noted that the scope of the causative changes if it is attached to V2,
as shown in (906): In this case, the presence of -erate on 'go' implies that 'he
sent someone to go' and do the job.
A further suffix that can be marked on VI is the continuous aspect marker -ahe
(or allomorphs). However, other aspect markers are not attested on V1. The two
examples in (907) illustrate the use of this suffix, but no examples are attested
for other aspect markers in this position. Note that the asymmetry in aspect
marking is significant: if the aspect were marked on the motion verb (V2), this
would imply a continuous way of 'going', which is not the case. It would be
difficult to state whether the aspectual value applies to the whole construction
or to one of its components only. In a way, this asymmetry is a challenge to the
view that the construction represents a single predicate. This issue will be
further discussed in §17.5. Morphological marking on V2 is expressed by all
other suffixes, most typically including mood/tense, person, and polarity.
a)
ama-uru-a=ne hana situ-hi-a ku-a lejhii katQa
take-PL-3ps/D=SUB when [pass-CNT-NTR go-3ps/A] one man
'When they took him, a man went passing by.' [NT: Luke 23,26]
b)
ahaenaa su-ahi-a=ne ku-ü
grass [kill-CNT-NTR=FOC: 1 sg go-1 sg/E]
Ί went to weed grass.'
(908) Reduplication in VI
a)
ne-temia+temia-ka ku-ure
[ITR-RED+lean.together-NTR go-3pl/E]
'They went to lean together there.'
b)
ihja ke hetau takaaka+takaako-a ku-ure
lighthouse.tree VLI HRS [RED+sit-NTR go-3pl/E]
'They went to sit down [as birds] on a lighthouse tree.'
There are a few isolated examples in which other categories are marked.
Example (909a) shows the plural object suffix as occurring on V I . On the one
hand, this is plausible since this category cannot be marked on the motion verb
(as 'come and 'go' are intransitive); on the other, the examples listed in (909)
appear to be exceptional. (909b) illustrates the use of the velocity suffix on V I .
Note that the meaning of 'quickly' does not extend to V2 'go' here. Another
category which can be marked on VI is the passive suffix -noi followed by a
copular auxiliary (cf. §16.1.2).
b) Velocity:
kwara-uri-a ku-a
[see-RAP-NTR go-3ps/A]
'She went to see him quickly' [E.g. to briefly say good-bye]
c) Passive:
muku-nohiui-ni-a u-e
[catch-PASS=be-NTR come-3ps/E]
'It came to be caught.' [about a chicken that was easily caught]
(910) Loans as VI
In fact, there are no particular semantic restrictions for verbs occurring as the
first verb in a SVC. The examples in (911) illustrate the use of verbs that
express sound (tonia) or refer to 'speak' (naa).
a)
jiae asaa-hi-ri-1 tom-a ku-a
already inside-CNT-RAP-PRT [sound-NTR go-3ps/A]
'It already sounded deeper [as the fruit fell into the water].'
b)
sehtee na-a ku-a
(sound) [say-NTR go-3ps/A]
'It sounded [deeper, like] "sehtee".'
17.2 Properties of V2
As mentioned above, only very few verbs can function as V2 in an SVC. Apart
from ' g o ' and ' c o m e ' , only one other verb with an independent lexical content,
amue+muee-ka 'wander around' is attested in natural text. In elicited examples,
also the verbs amua ' w a l k ' and letoaa 'send' were accepted as V2 of a serial
verb in some contexts. In the elicited cases, letoaa appears to take a purposive
a)
suru-a nukuj-a=ne hana, u-a
[run-NTR in.vain-3ps/D=SUB] when die-3ps/A
'When he ran in vain, he died.'
b)
ka=nesari kurenia niririhi-a nukue-re-i=ta
1 sg=booty for [do.like.that-NTR in.vain-IRR-2ps=FRS]
'You would behave like that in vain for my booty.' [To mean: 'If you (the jaguar)
attacked me to steal my booty, you would not stand a chance.']
The other verb is neheria 'almost do', which differs from nuhija in that it does
not occur as a full verb; i.e. it is always combined with another verb that
precedes it. An interesting lexical observation is the possible diachronic relation
between neheria and neheratia 'get angry', which morphologically would be
identical to the causative form of 'almost do'. Thus, getting angry, which is one
of the worst offences in Urarina culture, would be equalled to 'make almost do'
a)
lureri-jtemaahei hetau=te komo-a nehere
house-also HRS=FOC [fall-NTR almost.do:3ps/E]
'The house also almost fell.' [Context: When the giant spirit entered the house]
b)
hanotü ku-uru-a=ne hau, hvara-elanaala tQoae bauleneto-a
at.night go-PL-3ps/D=SUB because see-PRV above [hit.down-NTR
a) SVC:
nalu-a neheri-tQäu
[fall-NTR almost.do-lsg/A]
Ί almost fell.'
75
The word for 'enemies' literally means 'those who get angry'.
d) Negation:
heriane katga-uru beelaj-a u-ri-ßa=l
probably man-PL [give.as.gift-NTR come-IRR-NEG:3ps/A=ASS]
'Probably he will not come to make gifts to the people [but to exploit them].'
e) Probability:
kwara-a ku-kaj-a
[see-NTR go-PRB-3ps/A]
'He probably went to see.'
With the imperative marked in SVCs, which always occurs on V2, only ua
'come' can be used as V2, such as in 'come to see!' (917). The use of kua is not
possible: A sentence such as 'go to see!' must be expressed by use of the distal
form (cf. (917b)).
a) With 'come':
hvara-a u-u
[see-NTR come-IMP]
'Come to see!'
b) With 'go':
hvara-ni-u
see-DSTL-IMP
'Go to see!'
c) Ungrammatical form
*hoara-a ku-u
see-NTR go-IMP
[To mean]: 'Go to see!'
The same rule applies to the hortative form, where the imperative can be used if
' c o m e ' is V2 of a SVC, but not if ' g o ' is in this position. The situation is
different for the jussive form, as it is not compatible with the distal suffix; In
this case, hta ' g o ' may be used as V2 in a serial verb (cf. (918)). However, this
is only possible with the innovative suffix -ijie, but not with the older suffix
-mti (cf. § 15.1.3). Other verbs as V2 are not attested with the imperative.
ku hau-i
there throw-PRT
b) Participle:
amu-a ku-ι aräala ru-a
[walk-NTR go-PRT] tapir find-3ps/A
'When he went hunting, he found a tapir.'
In most combinations of two verbs in a SVC, the overall semantic value will
have a directional content, i.e. the core event is specified by a motion verb for
'go' or 'come'. However, in many cases, the motion verb would not be needed
in order to express a motion, as this is already expressed by the semantics of
V I . For instance, the example in (920a) would be perfectly understandable
without the verb 'go', as 'return home' already implies motion (similar cases
are found with turua 'arrive', amua 'walk', sunia 'run', and ertoa 'enter', just
to name a few; accumulation of two identical verbs is not possible). However,
the use of a SVC in this context indicates the direction, as the people went
"away", which implies 'go home', rather than 'come home'.
b) With 'come':
ataw ari-1, eru-1, kau turu-a u-akaantt=lu
land seek-PRT find-PRT here [arrive-NTR come-lpl/ex=REM]
'Looking for land, we found it and arrived here.' [Lit. 'came to arrive here']
The key question which arises here is, what is the functional difference between
constructions that involve a serial verb and such that do not? While the
difference may consist of a slight nuance only, these can be characterised as
follows:
1. The presence of a motion verb in second position may indicate a point of
change with regard to a previous event, i.e. the beginning of 'going' or
'coming', which leads to the event described by the core verb.
2. The fact that the core event requires motion of some kind is emphasised.
3. It is specified into what direction the motion expressed by VI is performed,
in terms of deixis, i.e. 'come' implies 'towards the point of reference',
whereas 'go' implies 'away from the point of reference'.
4. With other SVCs that have a non-directional interpretation (cf. (924)), the
presence of V2 is essential in order to express that function.
When V1 is not a motion verb (and V2 is), the semantic interpretation can be of
a directional nature, as illustrated in (921), but this is not necessarily the case.
The interpretation in this case overlaps with a purposive function ('go in order
to see'). Note that Urarina also has a purposive/consecutive construction (cf.
§20.2.4.1); the main difference between the SVC (as in (921)) and the purposive
construction lies in the directional component that is expressed by the motion
verb as V2. Purposive function is also implied by the example in (919a), where
the nominalisation 'what he had brought in order to cut her' involves
niitpa raa ht-i 'that what he went to take'.
In one example that involves the verb for 'wander around' as V2, the distinction
between directional, purposive, or resultative interpretation is even less
transparent. In (912) further above, the presence of V2 could emphasise on each
of the following interpretations, the function of which depends entirely on the
context:
a) The nature of teaching while wandering around, as opposed to staying in one
place,
a)
laueka-1 raj beree kuhoalate, na-a
be.sitting-PRT POSS child have.another.child:3ps/E [say-NTR
ku-uru-re=l=tQa
go-PL-IRR:3ps/E=ASS=EMF]
'They will go on saying: "While his baby is [still] sitting, she is [already] having
another child".'
b)
ßauene kwara-hi-a ku-uru-re=l=tQa
silence [see-CNT-NTR go-PL-IRR=ASS=EMF]
'They will be watching in silence.' [NT: John 19,37]
A resultative reading can also be implied without the use of future tense, as is
the case in the example involving verbs of sound as VI (cf. (911)).
In summary, there are clues, such as the use of certain aspect or tense
markers that help to specify the type of semantic content of a SVC. In a similar
way, the nature of VI may point at specific ways of interpretation. The table in
(924) illustrates an attempt to classify different semantic functions based on the
semantic content of VI in a SVC.
As the above table shows, most SVCs involve some degree of (directional)
motion, which is a natural consequence of the role played by V2. When VI is
also represented by a motion verb, the interpretation is resultative. For instance,
in 'he went to arrive', VI ('arrive') is the direct result of the motion expressed
by V2. While this may also involve a certain degree of purpose (i.e. the purpose
of going was to arrive), this is not the core content of the construction (and
therefore left unmarked in the table). With first verbs whose semantic core
expresses an activity not necessarily describing a directional motion, the overall
interpretation is different: these combinations typically refer to a purpose, apart
from the directional motion expressed by V2. For instance, in 'he went to see' it
is obvious that 'seeing' was the intended outcome (purpose). While it is usually
implied indirectly that the result of seeing was achieved, this does not appear to
be the core function (and is therefore unmarked in the table). This is even true
for an example such as 'he went to die', which implies a deliberate act
involving an agent (this example is repeated used in the NT when referring to
Jesus' death). However, it is evident that a certain degree of overlap between
purpose and result cannot be avoided. Other combinations may exclude an
actual motion, even though 'go' or 'come' are present as V2: This is the case
under two conditions:
1. V1 is intransitive, and
2. The subject of VI does not perform any action or activity.
For instance, when the underlying subject of naa 'say/sound' is an object
causing a noise, the interpretation in a SVC is resultative. In contrast, if the
subject of naa refers to an agent who is saying something, the interpretation
with 'go' would be 'he went to say', i.e. purposive. This illustrates that the
structure of the verbs involved in a SVC is predictable only to a certain extent,
while it also depends on the context.
Since the occurrence of final verbs other than 'come' and 'go' is marginal,
the semantic structure of those combinations will not be investigated here.
There also are a few cases of lexicalisation. In these examples, the overall
semantic content is not directly predictable from the semantics of its
components. The combination amua 'walk' plus lota 'go' is not intended to
mean 'go to walk', but refers to 'go hunting'. More transparent are the
combinations of raa 'receive' with 'go' and 'come', respectively. These are
interpreted as 'bring' or 'fetch', depending on the direction.
a) 'hunt':
ku neloanarite-i, kohzuanoo hetau amu-a ku-e
there make.shed-PRT next.day HRS [walk-NTR go-3ps/E]
'There he made a shed and went hunting the next day.'
b) 'fetch':
ßäe leot$a-uru=te eriua ra-a ku-e
already other-PL=FOC wood receive-NTR go-3ps/E
'The others already go to bring wood.'
This section investigates further aspects regarding the structure of SVC, which
includes general properties, such as the fact that they regularly occur in
dependent clauses (cf. §17.4.1). Contiguity and wordhood are two matters that
require some discussion, as is conducted in §17.4.2 and §17.4.5, respectively.
This is followed by the mentioning of two aspects that can be described as
being different from the prototypical structure of Urarina SVC: order variation
(cf. §17.4.3) and the exceptional occurrence of more than two verbs in a S V C
(cf. §17.4.4). §17.4.6 then discusses criteria by which SVCs can be
distinguished from other multi-verb constructions.
a) With hau:
turu-a ku-uru-a hau hetau=te, ke taka-i hetau,
[arrive-NTR go-PL-3ps] because HRS=FOC VLI meet-PRT HRS
ku kurua-hei, ra-ure
there be.happy-PRT receive-3pl/E
'As they went to arrive, they met him and were happy, and received him.'
b) With hana\
enoa-to-a ku-a=ne heri-a=ne hana, hua hauria
[enter-INTS-NTR go-3ps/D=SUB] want-3ps/D=SUB when don't first
eno-a=ra
enter-NTR=EMF
'When he wanted to rush in, [she said], "Do not enter yet".'
17.4.2 Contiguity
If we define contiguity within a SVC to mean that no arguments can occur
between the verbs of a SVC, it is evident that Urarina serial verbs follow this
pattern. However, there are a few elements that can occur between V1 and V2,
even though this is fairly rare. While some of these are clitics (e.g. the focus
markers), also full adverbs can occur in this position. In detail, the presence of
raka 'yesterday' hajti 'still', and ht 'there' between the verbs in (927) was
confirmed to be acceptable in elicitation; however, there are no examples in
natural texts. In contrast, the adverb jiäe 'already' was not found to be
acceptable in this position.
(927) Occurrence of adverbs in SVC (elicited)
Elements that are attested between the two verbs of a SVC in natural speech
include the focus marker, the adversative marker niki, and a number of particles.
The fact that disyllabic (and tone-bearing) words such as niki can be inserted
indicates that phonological factors such as word length do not play a role with
regard to their insertability. However, it may show that only grammatical
elements are allowed in this position. (928) illustrates the use of these markers.
a) Adversative:
mi lenone te-ra ari-a niki amuemu-he
that food give-AG [seek-NTR ADVRS wander-CNT:3ps/E]
'He was wandering around to seek the one who had provided the food [but would not
find him].'
b) Focus:
lenone ari-a=te kn-e
food [seek=FOC go-3ps/E]
'He went to seek food.'
The function of the focus marker in this context is to draw attention to the
content expressed by the first verb and its argument. The insertion of =te is
optional, since the position of the VP already is initial, i.e. the clitic is not
needed to shift it to the front. Therefore, the difference in meaning as compared
to the example without =te is merely a pragmatic nuance (cf. §19).
In summary, the question whether SVCs in Urarina are contiguous depends
on the definition of contiguity. I am following the approach suggested in
Aikhenvald (2005), which regards a SVC as contiguous if no arguments can
intervene. Since this is the case in Urarina, it will be fitted into the typological
categorization as "contiguous".
76
These findings are based on suggestions by consultants in elicitation.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
646 Serial verb constructions
a) With conjunction:
u-u kat^a-uru rela-i=jie kujßa
come-IMP man-PL teach-2ps=SUB so.that
'Come to teach the people!'
b) Regular SVC:
katga-uru rela-a u-u
man-PL teach-NTR come-IMP
'Come to teach the people!'
c) Order variation:
u-u katQa-uru rela-a
come-IMP man-PL teach-NTR
'Come to teach the people!'
While the exact conditions for this kind of inversion are not entirely clear, it
seems that the purposive aspect of it plays a central role. The variation is also
possible in declarative sentences such as Ί went to fish' or 'he went to build his
house', but it is not acceptable with other semantic types, e.g. such examples
with a mainly resultative or aspectual meaning.
Usually, each SVC consists of not more than two verbs, with one exception:
when the verb nuhija 'do in vain' is involved, three verbs can occur in
sequence. In this case, the first two verbs are each marked with the neutral
suffix, while mikuja receives all inflectional markers. Examples are given in
(930); however, it must be noted that these constructions are comparatively rare
and thus do not allow an in-depth study.
a)
tahia=na kuaka-a ku-a rtukuj-a-akaanu
over.there=FOC: 1 pi [wait-NTR go-NTR in.vain-NEG-lpl/ex]
'We did not go over there to wait in vain [since hiding during the hunt was successful].'
b)
ate ari-a ku-a nukuj-a=m hana, niji eru-i
fish [seek-NTR go-NTR in.vain-3ps/D=SUB] when nothing find-NEG:3ps/A
'When he went fishing in vain, he found nothing'
It should also be noted that in all examples with mihija, the second verb is kua,
which also functions as V2 in "normal" SVCs. This is merely "extended" by the
addition of nukuja, in order to add the information 'in vain'. However, by this
addition, kua itself is treated as a dependent verb, as it is marked with the
neutral suffix in the same way as V1.
17.4.5 Wordhood
scope over the preceding verb as well. Conversely, the use of grammatical
categories such as the causative, plural object marking or velocity have scope
only over the verb they are attached to (i.e. VI). While in one case, the
components of the SVC form a single grammatical unit, they represent separate
units in the other. Thus, the syntactic and grammatical features of a SVC do not
necessarily coincide with its wordhood status.
From the phonological point of view, a SVC also consists of two separate
prosodic words, since each of the verbs involved receives a Η tone (cf. §4.7.5).
When another element intervenes (i.e. =te or niki), it forms one phonological
unit with V I , as only one Η tone is assigned.
In summary, the wordhood factor points towards a tendency of both verbs of
a SVC to be characterised as separate words, which is in contrast to the finding
that the grammatical features of V2 apply to the construction as a whole.
The contrast between SVCs and complement clauses were already illustrated in
(915), where it was shown that the constructions clearly differ from each other
with respect to form and function. The differences between SVC and participle
constructions are much more subtle, as the example in (931) shows, which can
be contrasted with (912). While the SVC tends to have purposive reading ('in
order to teach'), the participle is interpreted more as referring to the manner of
teaching. In particular, this construction refers to two separate events, most
commonly occurring as a sequence, but with a range of possible functional
variations (cf. §20.3.4). In contrast, the SVC describes a single event. Another,
formal difference between the SVC and other constructions is of course that a
SVC represents a single clause.
The differences that distinguish SVCs from other constructions which involve
more than one verb are summarised in (932) and should also help in order to
classify Urarina SVCs from a cross-linguistic point of view.
While wordhood and transitivity do not play a role for the distinction of
different multi-verb constructions, SVCs differ from all other construction types
with respect to at least one feature. The closest structural similarity exists to
same subject complement clauses (cf. §20.2.1), which mainly differ from SVCs
through a specific suffix that is attached to the first verb. While one could now
argue that the neutral marker be just a different sort of complementiser, one has
to be aware of the fact that there are significant differences on the semantic
level, as discussed above.
The question of how SVCs differ from monoverbal constructions can be
answered on semantic grounds, as is also illustrated by the examples in (933):
While the SVC refers to the purposive character of the event, the monoverbal
clause focuses on the result of the action.
b) Monoverbal clause:
enua ke=te irü
tree VLI=FOC go.up-3ps/E
'He climbed up the tree.'
As noted above, a common feature of all SVCs is that they share the subject.
Object sharing is a different issue as it is technically not possible for an
intransitive verb to take an object - and V2 is intransitive. 77 In a similar way,
the asymmetry between V I and V2 types occurs on other levels. While V I can
be represented by a verb of either transitivity value, V2 is always intransitive.
So is it legitimate to bother about the overall transitivity value of the entire
construction? Based on the definition of SVCs as "a single predicate"
(Aikhenvald 2003:5), this question must be asked and the answer for Urarina is
not straightforward. From a morphological point of view, one could argue that
V 2 is the properly inflected verb in this construction, or the morphological
head. However, this does not have a direct impact on the transitivity of the
construction. In example (909b), plural object marking occurs on V I and it is
evident that it could not be marked on the intransitive V2. Therefore, it may be
concluded that the transitivity values of the verbs in a SVC are independent
f r o m each other. However, this puts the idea that SVCs are a "single predicate"
in doubt.
In a similar way, the fact that certain grammatical features can be marked on
V I raises questions about the status of Urarina SVCs as a single event. In
examples such as (905a), the causative is marked on V I and its scope is V I 'let
him k n o w ' , while V2 'they w e n t ' does not have a causative meaning. T h e only
w a y to regard this sort of construction as a single event is to focus on the
purposive function of V2. What remains undecided at this stage is in what way
this construction differs semantically from a "real" purposive construction with
a subordinate clause, which could easily replace some SVCs. T h e same
difficulty occurs with examples such as in (907), where aspect is marked on V I ,
but not on V2: If the construction as a whole is understood to have one aspect
value, this is not formally marked. In (907a), the entire SVC could be
interpreted to have continuous aspect value, but this is not the case for (907b).
T h e difference between these examples is that (907b) has purposive function,
while the function of (907a) implies motion/direction; yet other examples have
a resultative character. The secret of correct interpretation lies in the knowledge
about the context.
Concentrating on the predictable, formal side of SVCs, one would wonder
about the reason for the morphological asymmetry, i.e. what is the nature of
m o r p h e m e s that can be marked on V I ? If one considers the markers for
causative, continuous aspect, velocity, and plural object in the light of position
classes (cf. §12.2), it becomes evident that these suffixes occupy positions one
77
The example letoaa 'send' as V2 will not be considered here, since it is based on
isolated, elicited examples and is not representative of Urarina SVCs.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Discussion and summary 651
to seven - that is, they are comparatively close to the root, regarding the fact
that almost a dozen more suffixes may follow. In contrast, the types of
inflection typically found on V2, such as person, number, negation, mood, and
in-law talk occupy positions rather late in the linear order of suffixes. In a way,
the suffixes occurring on V1 also have a more "derivational" status (except for
aspect marking), which would indicate that VI is not actually to be considered
as "inflected". However, as considered in §10, I do not strictly split up these
suffixes into "derivational" vs. "inflectional" types here. In fact, recall that
person marking is the only obligatory grammatical category, which can
arguably be described as "inflectional". What is important to note is that the
categories which are most relevant to the grammatical interpretation of the
clause, are marked on V2. Negation, number, and mood may arguably be
described as such "essential" categories of inflection - and these are marked at
the end of a predicate in Urarina.
Order Languages %
SOV 180 44.8
svo 168 41.8
vso 37 9.2
vos 12 3.0
OVS 5 1.2
osv 0 0
Total 402 100.00
Even for some languages listed as "OVS", this order is not entirely consistent.
Several Carib languages such as Bacairi (Wheatley 1973; DeAbreu 1895; von
den Steinen 1892), Apalai (Koehn 1974), or Arekuna (Armellada 1943; Koch-
Gruenberg 1924/1928; Edwards 1977) are subject to conflicting sources. Some
authors describe them as "OVS", but others as "SOV", which is partly related to
the Ergative system of these languages. Two other Carib languages that can be
convincingly characterised as OVA/VS are Hixkaryana (Derbyshire 1985) and
Trio (Carlin 2004). Interestingly, all of these languages belong to the Carib
family. For Urarina, the constituent order is consistently OVA/VS, with specific
deviations that are entirely predictable. This order applies to dependent and
independent clauses. In the independent (or "main") clause, constituents can be
focused. In this case they are shifted to the front and followed by a focus
marker. This is discussed in greater detail in §19. Furthermore, the structure of
all clauses is characterised by the following features:
- Subject and object are frequently omitted and understood by the context.
Note that no pronouns are required to refer to a 3ps object (cf. (938)).
- The order for affirmative and negative sentences is identical, with possible
variation in the negative (see §18.3).
- Adjuncts and postpositional phrases usually occur in the periphery of the core
clause. Most typically, they precede the object (cf. §18.4).
- In many sentences, adverbs or other items such as 'therefore' are focused.
This does not affect the order of the other constituents. Gap fillers such as
ßäe already' and hi 'there' can occur in almost any position in the sentence.
However, they would not occur within constituents (cf. §18.4.2).
While details will be discussed further below, the following factors become
evident at first sight:
1. Clauses without any overt argument are extremely common. These make up
much over half of all examples.
2. Where arguments are present, most clauses follow the basic constituent order
OVA/VS. Their frequency is five times higher than the deviating order types
(35% vs. 7%).
3. There is a minority of clauses that exhibit a different order.
These can be explained by factors such as focus and a few
other special forms, which include negation and the
presence of the 'must' construction, as will be investigated
below. Other orders than the ones stated in (935) are not
attested.
The word order within the Noun Phrase is discussed in §6. As suggested, not all
kinds of modifiers have a fixed position in the NP, but certain tendencies and
preferences can be summarised as follows:
- Demonstratives, numerals, and possessors always precede the nominal head.
Most other modifiers have variable order.
- Adjectival or noun-like modifiers typically follow the head noun.
- Other modifiers can occur in prenominal or postnominal position, especially
quantifiers.
- The typical or preferred order may be described as [DEM] - [POSSR] -
[NUM] - [N] - [ADJ],
- Urarina does not have relative clauses, but these are substituted by various
kinds of nominalisation that may occur with modifying function before or
after the nominal head. Thus, grammatical categories such as tense and
aspect are not expressed by these substitutes.
The constituent order within the dependent clause is largely identical to the
independent clause. Naturally, full NPs are even rarer in dependent clause, as
the referent of subject and object is usually mentioned in the main clause (if it is
mentioned at all). In the case of participle constructions and infinitives, the
subject is only expressed on the main verb. In subordinate clauses, the subjects
of dependent and independent clauses may be different (but they do not need to
be overtly expressed).
From a typological point of view, there are six logically possible orders of
subject, verb, and object in a clause: AVO, AOV, VAO, VOA, OVA, and OAV.
Cross-linguistically, the first four types are relatively well attested, whereas the
last two types are hardly accounted for. Urarina represents one of these rare
types, since the unmarked word order is OVA. It has to be noted that, in a
language with extensive omission of overt NPs, the presence of arguments
realised as core NPs is not very frequent. However, OVA is the formally and
functionally unmarked constituent order, as is illustrated by the examples in
(936). A formal marking would involve a frontshift of the subject to the front, in
which case a focus enclitic must be attached to it. The examples are functionally
unmarked as they do not exhibit any pragmatic peculiarities in the context they
occur in. Note that in dependent clause, the presence of full NPs for both A an
Ο is rarer than it is in main clauses, which could be due to the fact that
dependent clauses mainly provide information that supplements information
given in the main clause, i.e. the participants are usually mentioned in the main
a) Independent clause:
mtoanei hetau=te katga lemu-e=lu lomaj
[like.that HRS=FOC] [man] [sink-3ps/E=REM] [PSN]
[ADV] [Ο] [V] [A]
b) Dependent clause:
unee bua basihjau-a alau=ne
[kinkajou bag] [steal-3ps/D] [spider.monkey=CND]
[Ο] [V] [A]
'When the spider monkey stole kinkajou's bag'
As was made clear through the table in (935), the omission of arguments is very
c o m m o n . In fact, subject and object are only present in 19% of all examples (S
in intransitive clauses; both A and Ο in transitive clauses), whereas in all other
cases, at least one argument does not surface as an NP. T h e examples in (937)
illustrate transitive clauses that lack an overt subject.
a) Independent clause:
hitarü kaute-na ii kuriki u-a-re-ü=ni
[all remain-NOM 2sg money] [come-CAUl-IRR-lsg/E=ASS]
[O] [V]
Ί will bring all of your money that remains.'
b) Dependent clause:
ate kuhwu-uru-a häu ra-ahva-ure
[fish] [fish.with.hook-PL-3ps/D] [because] [receive-DSTR-3pl/E]
[Ο] [V] [CNJ] [Main]
'As they fished with hooks, they each caught [some].'
In the same way, the object of a transitive clause can be omitted. In this case, it
is automatically understood as 3ps (singular or plural) and its referent would be
known from the context. While it is not uncommon for S arguments to surface
as an NP in an independent clause, examples for the structure VA in
independent clause (such as in (938b)) are rare. Pragmatically, this is a plausible
consequence of the fact that the subject is usually expressed in the main clause
or already known from the context. In (938c), strictly speaking, the verb of the
independent clause (naa 'say (so)') is intransitive in terms of its morphological
features (cf. §9.5); however, it has a special status since it functions as a
quotative verb that is always preceded by direct speech in narratives (cf.
§20.2.4.2).
a) Independent clause:
niriu hohvajtQa-kuru ajjia ne-rela-t, itga-kuru-a leotga-uru
[PLN inhabitant-PL with ITR-teach-PRT] [do-PL-3ps/A] [other-PL]
[DEP] [V] [A]
'Learning with the people from the Marafion River, the others learnt it [too].'
b) Dependent clause:
su-a lejhii katQa=ne hau, ßäe nalu-a alau
[kill-3ps/D] [one man=SUB] [because] [already fall-3ps/A spider.monkey]
[V] [A] [CNJ] [Main]
'As a certain man killed it, the spider monkey already fell.'
a) Independent clause:
kuraanaa rn-a ruru
[chief] [be-3ps/A] [howler.monkey]
[CC] [V] [CS]
'The howler monkey is the chief.'
b) Dependent clause:
kauatQa-i kuraanaa ni-a=ne=ta
[good-NEG: 3 ps/A] [chief] [be-3ps/D=CND=FRS]
[Main] [[CC] [V]]DEP
'It is not good that he is chief.'
While the figures represented in (935) represent a summary of order types, these
are shown in detail in (940). Note that copula complements are integrated into
these figures as Ο arguments, as they have syntactically identical properties.
Accordingly, copula subjects are represented as S arguments here. The table in
(940) shows the occurrence of order types in the main clause (445 examples),
(942) lists the distribution of order types in dependent clauses (354 cases).
Text no.: T7 T12 T13 T16 T23A T34 T35A Total Total
Speaker: JN HN JN MA HN HN %
V 11 4 9 33 9 161 8 235 52.8
vs 5 4 9 10 2 14 7 51 11.5
sv 3 0 4 1 2 1 4 15 3.4
ov 4 0 15 6 3 53 4 85 19.1
VA 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 7 1.6
AV 0 0 2 1 1 5 1 10 2.2
OVA 0 0 5 5 1 2 3 16 3.6
AOV 2 0 6 4 0 3 10 25 5.6
OAV 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.2
Total 26 8 51 61 18 244 37 445 100.0
As mentioned, the texts are of different genre and by different speakers. Texts 7
and 13 are told by an older speaker, however, with a sophisticated knowledge of
Spanish. The speaker is not used to telling stories. Text 7 is a hunting story
(personal experience) and text 13 an account of the village history. Text 16 is a
traditional narrative told by an older speaker, a trained storyteller. Texts 12 and
23A are both presented by a younger speaker with little experience in story
telling. They are narratives that describe dangerous situations experienced by
others (not the speaker himself). Text 35A is by the same speaker and is a
picture description as a given task. It is evident from the statistics that this type
of genre differs significantly from the others: the frequency of clauses with
deviational order types in this text equals the number of examples with regular
order. However, this can easily be accounted for by the fact that the speaker
shifts the subject into focus in many examples as he describes the given images.
Text 34 is a natural conversation between two speakers via a shortwave radio.
Overall, not taking into account clauses without an overt argument ("V"), 76%
(159 out of 210) of order in the main clause correspond to the regular OVA/VS
scheme, whereas 24% deviate from that.
This preference becomes even clearer in dependent clauses. In fact, 91 % of
all dependent clauses that have an overt argument follow this rule, whereas only
9% (12 out of 128) exhibit deviating orders. Again, it is observed that "V" is the
most frequent clause type.
Text no.: T7 T12 T13 T16 T23A T34 T35A Total Total %
Speaker: JN HN JN ι MA HN HN
V 23 7 33 53 24 83 3 226 63.8
vs 6 1 3 5 1 10 0 26 7.3
sv 3 0 5 1 0 0 0 9 2.5
ov 14 4 21 10 1 30 4 84 23.7
VA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.3
AV 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0.8
OVA 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 5 1.4
AOV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Total 50 12 63 70 26 126 7 354 100.0
intransitive verbs, such as active intransitive verbs (943a), stative verbs (943b),
and the use of an intransitive verb as the inflected verb in a serial v e r b
construction (cf. 943c)). T h e sentence in (943d) contains a copula, which, with
existential function, behaves like an intransitive verb (cf. §9.6.4).
d) With copula:
nii baja ßäe ni-a itulere rukuele
[that after] [already] [be-3ps/A] [all.kinds things]
[CNJ] [ADV] [V] [CS]
'After that, there already were all kinds of things ... [in order to hunt].'
78
The verb probably contains the intransitiviser ne-. However, a transitive base form,
which would be *tooka, is not attested.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
660 Constituent order
b) With copula:
m-a akauru ufavana hana aari=jie, ßadera-ure
[be-3ps/D] [3pl field inside] [topa.tree=CND] [be.sad-3pl/E]
[V] [PP] [CS] [Main]
'If there was a topa tree in their field, they were sad ... [because they could not remove
it].'
In summary, the order of core arguments in dependent clauses does not differ
from that in independent clauses. However, there is a preference regarding the
position of non-core arguments in dependent clauses, as will become evident in
§18.4.
There are several conditions that can have an impact on the unmarked word
order: focus or emphasis, negative marking, and the involvement of the 'must'
construction. The most important factor is focus (also cf. §19): any constituent
of a clause can be focused; in this case, it is followed by a focus marker and
shifted to the front. Most commonly, non-core constituents such as adverbs or
discourse-related expressions (e.g. mi hau (lit. 'that+'because') to mean
'therefore') are marked for focus. A change in the basic constituent order only
applies when the subject of a transitive or intransitive clause is focused. Typical
contexts for focus involving deviating constituent order are content questions
and the frontshifting of subjects. As illustrated in (945a), the latter results in the
order AOV, since all other constituents remain unchanged. However, the scope
of focus sometimes involves more than a single constituent: In (945b), the
subject plus the adverbial expression nianatii 'even' are focused to mean 'even
the people from the other side of the Maranon River'.
a)
raj kalaui=te fwei bajhja-1 ama-e
[POSS son=FOC] [firewood] [carry.on.shoulder-PRT take-3ps/E]
[Α] [Ο] [V]
'Her son carries firewood on his shoulder and takes it along.'
In the same way, the subject of an intransitive clause can be shifted to clause-
initial position by the use of a focus marker. In (946a), the subject N P 'one
man' is moved to the front, followed by the focus marker =te. (946b) shows
focus of a subject pronoun. In dependent clauses, focus markers do not occur.
a)
lejhii katQa=te hatäi nesoonete
[one man=FOC] [very] [be.scared:3ps/E]
[S] [ADV] [V]
O n e man is very scared.' [from picture description]
b)
kaa=te hjabereonei makaak-e
[this=FOC] [entirely] [be.flat-3ps/E]
[S] [ADV] [V]
'This one is entirely flat.' [about shapes]
Focus is the most frequent cause for changes in the constituent order. As seen
above, this is marked by a focus marker. However, there are a few more
contexts that can coincide with a frontshift of the subject, even without formal
marking. In particular, this applies to clauses that involve a negated verb: in
combination with negation, focus markers are not used and subsequently, a
frontshift of the subject (if required to indicate focus) occurs without a focus
marker. The examples in (947) slightly differ from each other: in (947a), the
verb is active intransitive, whereas (947b) involves a copula verb, here used
with existential (=intransitive-like) function.
a)
hat a! jioaelu ne-nakauru niji enanihja kuane
[very earlier be-those.who] [not.at.all] [canoe inside]
[S] [ADV] [PP]
amu-uru-i=lu
[walk-PL-NEG:3ps/A=REM]
[V]
'Those who lived very much earlier did not at all go by canoe.'
b)
jioaelu ena aj-a=ne tokuanei itgafiva ni-ji-lu,
[earlier] [now AUX-3ps/D=SUB compared.to] [rifle] [be-NEG:3ps/A=REM]
[ADV] [DEP] [CS1] [VI]
kartutgo m-ji=lu
[ammunition] [be-NEG:3ps/A=REM]
[CS2] [V2]
'Earlier there were no guns and no ammunition, like there are now.'
huituku-uru-i
[know-PL-NEG:3ps/A]
[V]
'Those who live now do not at all know the mixture [for making blowgun poison].'
b) With copula:
kivatia kann i=tgene letono ni-a-u=ta
not [lsg] [2sg=place envoy] [be-NEG-1 sg/E=FRS]
[INTR] [CS] [CC] [V]
Ί am not the envoy for your place!'
The function of this order variation clearly relates to focus and emphasis,
(which may coincide in Urarina, depending on the context). This becomes
especially clear in example (948b), where Adam, who is the only human left in
the world, warmly welcomes one of two women who suddenly appear. In
protest, she makes it very clear that he is embracing the wrong one: the pronoun
for lsg, which is in initial position, is in focus to mean 'it is not me (but the
other one)'. As negative clauses do not occur with focus markers, the move is
made without formal marking.
It should be noted that negation does not normally incur subject-initial order;
this only applies when focus or emphasis of the subject are implied. Examples
for the regular constituent order in combination with negation are given in
(949).
a) Dependent clause:
nete ßäe akauru-netonaj ne-rela-i ßäe enene
but [already] [3pl-also] [ITR-teach-PRT] [already nowadays
[CNJ] [ADV] [S] [V] ([Main])
b) Independent clause:
ausirijiem-a raj komasaj=ße hau hetau=te
[be.pregnant-3ps/D POSS wife=SUB because HRS=FOC]
[DEP]
a) Attached to S:
katpa rüa sim-a reemae-netonaj
[man side] [sleep-3ps/A] [dog-also]
[LOC] [V] [S]
'The dog also sleeps at the man's side.'
c) Attached to O:
leotQa-uru-netonaj ru-akaanu
[other-PL-also] [meet-lpl/ex]
[O] [V]
'We have also met the others.'
The same focus-like structure as illustrated with -netonaj is found with another
expression that follows a noun: manatii 'even' frequently follows a subject that
occurs in clause-initial position. Similar to -netonaj, an inherent emphatic
function is implied.
kauatQa-i mitQu-a=ne
[good-PRT] [get.up-3ps/D=CN D]
[ADV] [V]
'If even the young people get up to [follow] what God wants, ... [the project will
succeed].'
b) Independent clause:
mjej nii nuriu kokvajtQa-kuru nianatn
[not.at.all] [that PLN inhabitant-PL even]
[ADV] [S]
b) In final position:
kana kuraanaa ne-1 kuraati-a rabiri-jtetonaj natu
[lpl/in chief be-PRT] [name-3ps/A] [Rabbi-also even]
[DEP] [V] [S]
'Even also the Rabbi [himself] called him "Lord".' [NT: Mark 12:37]
Another context which allows a subject to move to front position without the
overt presence of a focus marker is the construction with 'must'. This
construction is formed by an inflected verb followed by netene (or variants such
as mrajjie, nerajtene). While it would literally mean 'it is that', it can be
regarded as lexicalised (also cf. §20.2.2.6). With this construction, a subject
may precede the verb, as illustrated in (954).
a)
ißono ku-a lejhii itQauena=ne=te
[ayahuasca drink-3ps/D one elder=CND=FOC]
[DEP]
b)
jioaelu ne-nakauru katQa-uru hitQana ha-uru-a mrajße
[earlier be-those-who man-PL] [blowgun] [make-PL-3ps/D must]
[Α] [Ο] [V]
raaheniane
[self]
[ADV]
'The people who lived earlier had to make blowguns themselves.'
Again, this order is not compulsory for the 'must' construction, as exemplified
in (955). Here, the subject is found in regular, final position despite the presence
of'must'.
a)
ßäe nehelau ne-~t amiani-a nerajtene iglesia mi komunida
[already] [other.side be-PRT] [work-3ps/D must] [church that community]
[ADV] [ADV] [V] [S]
'The community of this church must already work differently.'
b)
eskwela ke ku-uru-a nerajtene kanaanaj-uru
[school VLI] [go-PL-3ps/D must] [child-PL]
[Ε] [V] [S]
'The children must go to school.'
Parallel to the examples given with the expression for 'also' and 'even', the
fronted position of the subject in 'must'-constructions implies focus or
emphasis, whereas the regular position does not imply this. Thus, nearly all
instances of constituent order that deviate from the basic OVA/VS pattern can
be explained by focus or emphasis, which is either formally marked or
associated with particular constructions. However, there are a few isolated
examples that exhibit subject-initial order without any formal marking and
without involving any of the expressions or constructions discussed above. Two
of these are given in (956). Example (956a) was later described as "ugly but
understandable" by other speakers; the example in (956b) resembles a
construction that involves a copula complement, as is illustrated in (957).
a)
mi hau nil eene ku helaj neda-e
[that because] [that woman] [there] [separate] [stay-3ps/E]
[CNJ] [S] [ADV] [ADV] [V]
'Therefore, that woman stayed there by herself.'
b)
ßäe itulere akauru rukuele, itulere ruria, itulere ubißa,
already [all.kinds 3pl things all.kinds masato.pot all.kinds stirring.stick
[S]
In order to account for the irregular order in (956b), one could assume that the
copula form ne-7, as found with the surrounding sentences in this context was
omitted for some reason: there is a special copula construction having the
meaning 'turn into'/'become', with intransitive function. As illustrated in (957),
the copula complement, (which occurs in the same position as the Ο argument
of a transitive verb), is followed by a participle form of the copula and a motion
verb for ' g o ' or 'walk' that bear the inflection. Literally, this combination could
be translated as 'it went being a (e.g. turtle)'. All examples occur in the same
context, where the speaker lists all the household items that turned into animals
during the flood. Interestingly, in four of the clauses (all listed in enumeration),
the subject appears in initial position, followed by the object, but both preceding
the verb. This is exceptional as similar structures are not found otherwise.
Another exceptional aspect of this construction is that it occurs without any
focus marker, which would normally appear when a subject is shifted to the
front.
a) net + amua:
akauru ruria jiäe nuri ne-1 amu-e
[3pl masato.pot] [already] [turtle] [be-PRT walk-3ps/E]
[CS] [ADV] [CC] [V]
'Their masato pots already turned into turtles.'
c) rm + lata:
kauru raj eruari ahaijx ne-1 ku-e
[3pl POSS mosquito.net] [paiche.fish] [be-PRT go-3ps/E]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'Their mosquito nets turned into paiche fish.'
Given the special meaning and its rare occurrence in other texts, the 'turn into'
construction with the copula can be regarded as idiomatic. As stated before,
variation of the basic constituent order such as illustrated in (956), which occurs
without formal or contextual marking, is extremely rare. In fact, only very few
examples of this type (including (956b)) are attested in the 799 clauses listed in
(940). Another rare example is displayed in (975a) further below, which
represents a syntactically rather complex sentence. It should also be noted that
there are no instances of order variation for the object of a transitive verb: It
always precedes the verb.
Thus, it can be concluded that Urarina has a basic constituent order
OVA/VS, which can be subject to variation in nearly entirely predictable
environments, related to focus and emphasis.
18.4 Adjuncts
In §9.5 it was stated that there is no formal distinction between adjuncts and
arguments in addition to A/S and O. As was argued there, "additional
arguments" accompanied by ÄE, e.g. as a result of valency increase, may exhibit
minor semantic differences to adjuncts (also cf. §16.5). A similar situation is
implied for the postposition raj, which may indicate a recipient or beneficiary of
verbs of saying or giving. What all postpositional phrases (PPs) have in
common is that they are optional and entirely omittable, (which is the main
argument for suggesting the absence of ditransitive verbs in Urarina, cf. §9.5).
Another feature that is shared by all PPs is their position in a clause, which is
most typically in the periphery of the core clause. The most typical position for
any PP is before the main verb. In transitive clause with an overt Ο argument,
the PP occurs before O. There are almost no attested natural examples for their
occurrence between Ο and the verb. One is cited in (958), where the
postposition raj 'for' is cliticised with a possessive proclitic; the demonstrative
which functions as the object, in turn, is realised as a proclitic attached to itg,ej
'for you'. Due to the clitic status of the elements involved, it is questionable
whether this can be characterised as a PP-insertion between Ο and V. Since this
example is marginal at any rate, one could conclude that generally, PPs do not
occur in this position.
Alternatively, but less commonly than before the Ο argument, a PP may occur
in postverbal position. If it does, the preferred position is after the subject.
However, there are a small number of examples in which a PP is found between
the verb and the subject (one example only in the selected texts described in
(935)). Semantic or pragmatic differences for this variation are unclear. A PP
may also be focused; in this case, it occurs with a focus marker and in clause-
initial position.
In (959), some examples for the preverbal occurrence of a PP involving ke
are shown. In (959a), the postposition has a strictly valency-increasing function,
being used in a causative construction: While the Ο argument (i.e. the recipient
of the blood) does not surface, the additional argument ("with blood") is marked
by ke. In (959b,c), the postposition has instrumental function. As seen in (959c),
the PP occurs in a dependent clause first, followed by the main clause that
contains an almost identical PP.
a) Independent clause:
na-~i kwitQana ke kukwa-e nii raj ßakana
[say-PRT] [blood VLI] [give.to.drink-3ps/E] [that POSS son-in-law]
[DEP] [PP] [V] [A]
'Saying so, his son-in-law gave him [his own] blood to drink.'
b) Dependent clause:
heräe kihja ke kuati-1 ra-a
[slowly] [paddle INST] [carefully.go-PRT] [receive-3ps/A]
[ADV] [PP] [V] [Main]
'Slowly going with the paddle, he got it [the axe].'
itulere itQa-kure
[all.kinds] [make-3pl/E]
[02] [V2]
'Making canoes with stone axes, they made all kinds of things with stone axes.'
a)
ita kuruatahane-1 ena ne-relaa-kure amiane-naa ke
[REC help-PRT] [now] [ITR-teach-3pl/E] [work-NOM VLI]
[DEP] [ADV] [V] [PP]
'Helping each other, they now learn (to) work.'
b)
lejhii=te teru ke fwi
[one=FOC] [axe INST] [cut:3ps/E]
[A] [PP] [V]
'One [man] cuts it with an axe.'
In the same way, the variable position of PPs is exemplified with the
postposition raj 'for/to'. Correspondingly, PPs involving raj are not obligatory.
The sentences in (961) illustrate the preverbal as well as the postverbal
occurrence of such PPs. As mentioned before, the postverbal position is less
common than the preverbal one. In (961c), two PPs involving raj occur, one in
preverbal position of the first clause, the other in postverbal position in the
second clause.
b) Preverbal position:
eresi ka=raj lejhii relor kurete-u
[tomorrow] [lsg=for] [one watch] [buy-IMP]
[ADV] [PP] [Ο] [V]
'Buy a watch for me tomorrow!'
In order to illustrate that the variable position with respect to the verb also
applies to other types of PPs, some examples with different postpositions are
given in (962) and (963). While examples are not listed for all existing
postpositions in each position, they can all occur in preverbal or postverbal
position. (962) first shows a few sentences that contain a PP in preverbal
position; (963) accounts for PPs in postverbal position. As becomes evident,
this involves PPs of different kinds, including locational, temporal, beneficiary,
and comitative postpositions (also cf. §5.7 for an overview of different
postpositions).
ni-ji=lu rte-naanaha
[be-NEG:3ps/A=REM be-LPP]
[Main]
'When we first entered the Espejo River, there was no place to live.'
While the preverbal variant is the preferred type (in terms of frequency), there
are no apparent differences with respect to semantic or pragmatic structure.
The examples in (963) illustrate the postverbal occurrence of different PPs,
again appearing with transitive clauses (cf. (963a,b,c,f)) and intransitive clauses
(cf. (963d,e)). Examples (963d,f) contain two PPs; in this case, the locational PP
precedes the verb, whereas the comitative PP follows (and no counterexamples
are attested, but note that the co-occurrence of several PPs in a clause is quite
rare). It is noteworthy that PPs do not occur in postverbal position in dependent
clause.
d) Locative and comitative (with asae 'under', ajpa 'with') (Independent clause):
helaj ne-naa loanari asae sini raj beree-kuru ajpa
[separate] [be-NOM shed under] [sleep:3ps/E] [POSS child-PL with]
[ADV] [PP1] [V] [PP2]
'She slept alone under a shed with her children.'
It can be concluded that the position of PPs is fairly free, with some exceptions
and preferences. There is a strong preference for their occurrence before the
verb, but deviations from this are not uncommon. In dependent clauses, the
preverbal position o f PPs is the only possible one. PPs as occurring between Ο
and V are not normally admitted.
The typical position for adverbs is in clause-initial position, examples for which
are shown in (965). This regards all types of adverbs, including time, location,
manner, and epistemics (cf. §5.3). A series of several adverbs in a row is also
-JQ
79
Whether there is any preferred order in sequences of adverbs is unknown.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
678 Constituent order
it$a-fairu-a=na hau
[do-PL-3 ps/D=SUB ] [because]
[V3] [CNJ]
'... buying all kinds of things, because they already do it easily without suffering'
Adverbs in initial position do not require a focus marker, but they can be
marked with it. In this case, the adverb is in focus, as illustrated in (966).
Interestingly, not all adverbs are attested with the focus marker, but this
combination mainly occurs with some temporal adverbs. Furthermore, the word
hoajtei 'again' and a few others are never observed with the focus marker.
alau
[spider.monkey]
[CS]
'Earlier, spider monkey was chief of the monkeys.'
There are only a few examples where adverbs occur in postverbal position.
This, however, is comparatively uncommon. In (967), the temporal adverbs
hauria 'at first' and ßäe 'already' are found in this position. It must be noted
that the word for 'already' is extremely frequent in general; sometimes there can
be various occurrences in one sentence and it is often used as a gap filler in
pauses (cf. §22.5). In (967b), the word occurs twice and it is possible that it
refers to the enumerative verb naaohwaa. Alternatively, the second occurrence
of ßäe could be interpreted as an apposition, added to the entire sentence.
ßäe
[already]
[ADV]
'... and their masato pots already turned into giant water turtles, already.'
The table in (968) gives an overview of the position of 325 adverbs in the
selected texts. The figures confirm the fact that preverbal position clearly is the
preferred one, with some adverbs never occurring after the verb. Corresponding
to the behaviour of PPs, adverbs do not occur after the verb in dependent clause.
From the table in (968), it also seems that temporal adverbs have a higher
flexibility with regard to their position than others. In contrast, the locational
adverb lot 'there' consistently occurs in preverbal position.
18.4.4 Summary
Overall, there is a clear preference for the position of adjuncts of any type to
occur before the verb. This is summarised in (970), which illustrates that
speaker differences and the genre type hardly play a role for this preference. As
becomes evident from (970b), adjuncts occur before the verb at an average rate
of 92%.
a) Tokens:
All clauses T7 T12 T13 T16 T23A T34 T35A Total
JN HN JN MA HN HN
ADV before V 30 5 37 53 12 159 8 304
ADV after V 1 0 5 1 1 13 0 21
PP before V 11 3 22 15 9 68 4 132
PP after V 1 0 3 0 0 8 1 13
LOC before V 5 0 6 7 0 2 0 20
LOC after V 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6
Total 48 9 75 76 23 252 13 496
b) Summary:
Adjunct Before V After V Total (100%)
ADV 304 (94%) 21 (6%) 325
PP 132 (91%) 13 (9%) 145
LOC 20 (77%) 6 (23%) 26
Average 456 (92%) 40 (8%) 496
The tendency of placing syntactic material other than objects into preverbal
position is further illustrated by dependent clauses. While it is possible for a
dependent clause to follow the main clause, the more typical position is before
the main clause. This applies to all types of dependent clauses, except for
purposive/consecutive clauses with kujjia 'so that' or huataa 'so that not'.
These preferably follow the main clause. In fact, out of 34 occurrences of these
two conjunctions in the selected texts, only 9 occurred before the main clause,
whereas the majority of 25 (= 74%) followed it. This distribution is in strong
contrast to the position of dependent clauses in general, as can be seen in (971).
On average, 69% of all dependent clauses precede the main clause.
a) Tokens:
T7 T12 T13 T16 T23A T34 T35A Total
JN HN JN MA HN HN
All clauses: 76 20 114 131 44 370 44 799
Total main clauses 26 8 51 61 18 244 37 445
Total DEP clauses 50 12 63 70 26 126 7 354
Preverbal DEP 32 9 29 59 21 89 5
clauses 244
Postverbal DEP 18 3 34 11 5 37 2
clauses 110
)) Summary in percent:
Total In %
Total main clauses 445 56%
Total DEP clauses 354 44%
Preverbal DEP clauses 244 69%
Postverbal DEP clauses 110 31%
All clauses: 799 100%
Examples for different types of dependent clauses that precede the main clause
are given in (972). Note that many sentences have more than one dependent
clause. When this is the case, again, some may follow the main clause, whereas
the majority precedes it. However, this "split" in position is not obligatory, as
there also are sentences where all dependent clauses precede or follow the main
clause.
m-mitQu-hua-e it$ana
[ITR-get.out-CNT-3ps/E] [blood]
[V2] [S2]
'When he said so to his father-in-law, when he saw him, he [the father-in-law] was
shredded over here, from all over here he was bleeding.'
a)
komasaj ajßa ham-a ku-a hau hetau=te
[wife with hunt.overnight-NTR go-3ps/D because HRS=FOC]
[DEP]
b)
ku hetau huara-a häu=te mi itanitQa hana hetau
[there HRS see-3ps/D because=FOC] [that mud inside HRS]
[DEP] [PP]
ht bam+bane-he
there [RED+moum-CNT:3ps/E]
[ADV] [V]
'As he [Adam] was looking there, he [the envoy] was mourning there in the mud.'
As mentioned above, the occurrence of dependent clauses after the main clause is less
typical, but not exactly uncommon. In (974), I give examples for different dependent
clauses as occurring after the main clause
a) Participle clause:
mtoanei hetau=te n=uhoana ha-ure-rehete jioaelu katga-uru,
[like.that HRS=FOC] [3ps=field][make-PL-HABl :3ps/E] [earlier man-PL]
[ADV] [Ο] [V] [A]
aheri+ku-teru ke kufwi-hjai
[stone+ASC-axe INST fell-PRT]
[DEP]
'The ancient made their fields like that, felling [trees] with stone axes.'
A sentence may also involve several dependent clauses, some of which precede
the main clause, whereas others follow it. Again, there is no fixed pattern that
would determine the order in which these occur, as this is entirely based on the
context (and the order of the events described).
)) Summary in percent:
Length Total In %
Main clause only 230 53.0
Sentences with 1 DEP 124 28.6
Sentences with 2 DEP 37 8.5
Sentences with 3 DEP 22 5.1
Sentences with 4 DEP 13 3.0
Sentences with 5 DEP 4 0.9
Sentences with 6 or more DEP 4 0.9
Total: 434 100.0
)) Summary in percent:80
Sentence Total In %
structure
TOTAL 431 96.9
Μ 244 54.8
DM 85 19.1
MD 39 8.8
DDM 22 4.9
DDDM 12 2.7
DMD 8 1.8
DDMD 7 1.6
MDD 7 1.6
DDDDM 4 0.9
DMDD 3 0.7
80
All other types, i.e. the 14 cases which make up the difference between 445 and 431,
are well below 1%.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:34 PM
Position of dependent clauses 691
Complement clauses generally precede the main clause, apart from very few
exceptions (cf. §23.3). Apart from that, constituent order is largely unaffected
by other clause types. The main difference is that content questions involve a
focused interrogative pronoun. Otherwise, questions have the same syntactic
structure as declaratives (cf. §21). Similarly, imperatives do not exhibit
syntactic peculiarities (cf. §15). Focus is discussed in greater detail in §19
In summary, Urarina has a constituent order that can be characterised as
pervasively OVA/VS, which is manifested both qualitatively and statistically as
the unmarked order in transitive and intransitive clauses, both as independent
and dependent, with affirmative as well as with negated verbs. The few cases in
which an alternative (AOV/SV) order is possible are confined to pragmatically
dependent contexts that involve focus or emphasis with subsequent fronting of
the subject. Adjuncts such as PPs and adverbs predominantly occur before the
verb, mostly in the periphery of the clause.
In §18.3, it was highlighted that any variation to the regular constituent order is
related to a frontshift of the subject or other constituents to mark focus. To
clarify what is meant by "focus" in this grammar, some of the terms related to
this will be defined first.
As there is a lack of uniformity in terminology within the linguistic community,
there is considerable degree of disagreement among linguists regarding the
definition of "focus" and other categories of information structure such as
"topic", "theme", "rheme", and "new vs. given information". Most authors
agree that the notion of focus and topic are related to the concept of old (or
given) information vs. new information. Old information may be characterised
as knowledge which is available to the listener at the time of utterance through
general knowledge or because it has been introduced before in the discourse. In
many languages, old information can be expressed through definiteness. New
information, in contrast, involves material that is added to the discourse for the
first time. In an oversimplified manner, topic is often characterised as "what the
sentence is about" whereas focus tend to be described as "an element of a
sentence with particular prominence". These definitions are brutal
generalisations of a concept that is too complex to be discussed in detail here.
Gundel & Fretheim (2005) distinguish between relational and referential topics
- the former referring to the theme of an utterance (which is complemented by
relational or information focus as representing the new information about the
topic), the latter as referring to topic as the current centre of attention. In a
similar way, Gundel & Fretheim distinguish between two major types of focus -
the type just mentioned (information focus) and contrastive focus, understood as
"material which the speaker calls to the addressee's attention, thereby often
evoking a contrast with other entities that might fill the same position." Both
types of focus "may be syntactically coded by placing the relevant constituent
in a syntactically prominent position" (cf. Gundel & Fretheim 2005:6). Other
languages may express such prominence prosodically, e.g. by intonation. In
fact, both topic and focus are typically represented by some formal marking,
which may be of syntactic, morphological, or phonological nature.
Urarina has only one means to indicate any sort of prominence: by attaching
an enclitic directly to the emphasised constituent, which occurs is in initial
position of the sentence (with frontshift where necessary; cf. §18.3). Focus in
the sense of contrastive focus as characterised above probably is the most
common function of this enclitic, which is the reason for glossing it as "FOC"
in this grammar. However, the functions of this marker are much more
widespread and may also include topicality (in the sense of relational topic). A
distinction between these functions is only possible through thorough
knowledge of the discourse. Thus, topic, contrast, or relevance of a fronted or
marked constituent for the sentence may be viewed as emphasis in general. 81
One could therefore refer to the focus marker in Urarina as a general device to
mark prominence. While examples for the fine distinctions in its function are
discussed in §19.1, one has to bear in mind that its glossing as a focus marker
throughout the rest of the grammar is a terminological simplification of its
actual functions.
Emphasis or prominence, which includes the functions mentioned in the
previous paragraph, is marked by enclitics that specify co-reference of the
emphasised constituent with the subject of the clause. In negative clauses and
in dependent clauses, these cannot be employed, but constituents are fronted
without additional formal marking (cf. §19.2.4 and §19.4). With the special
expressions as indicated above ('also', 'even', 'must'), the use of focus markers
is optional. Constituents that already occur in clause-initial position, such as
objects in a transitive clause or most adverbs, can also be marked with a focus
enclitic.
In any given text, a significant number of Urarina sentences contain a focus
marker. There are three focus-marking clause enclitics that are co-referenced
with the subject of a clause. Consequently, there can only be one focus marker
per clause. Any one constituent of a clause may be focused, but sometimes,
more than one constituent occurs before a focus marker, which is discussed in
§19.4. In polar questions and in dependent clauses (cf. §19.2.3), the focus
marker is not used, whereas it does occur in other clause types, such as in
content questions (cf. §19.2.2). With imperatives, focus markers play a special
role, as they may have consecutive/purposive function (cf. §19.2.1).
As discussed in §11, the presence of a focus marker in a sentence contributes
to the choice of the verb conjugation: With a focus marker present, the E-form
of the verb must be used (cf. § 11.2). The three focus enclitics are =ne, =na, and
=te, which occur with cross-referencing function to the subject of the main
clause. While =ne and =na refer to most 1st person forms, =te marks all other
persons. In addition, the distribution of the three focus markers is subject to free
variation between the two forms =ne and =na.
- With lsg subjects, the focus marker is =na (or variant =ne)
- With lpl/ex subjects, the focus marker is =na (or variant =ne, mainly in the
NT)
- With all other subjects, the focus marker is =te.
81
As context is particularly relevant for the interpretation of focus, the background for
each example in this chapter is given in form of the gloss of the preceding sentence.
82
Out of practical considerations, I refer to these clitics as "focus markers" here.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
694 Focus
The fact that the forms for lpl/du and lpl/in are cross-referenced with =te is
significant, as it reflects the fact that whenever the listener is involved in a form
of ' w e ' , this is expressed by the person cross-referencing system marked by the
focus enclitics: In the same way as =te refers to second and third person
subjects, it is used with the two lpl forms that include the listener, i.e. a 2ps
referent.
The variation between the two clitics =ne and =na is not homogeneous, if
one compares their occurrence in 23 selected texts of the database with their use
in the NT. In my data, =na is not only prevalent when occurring with lsg and
lpl/ex, but it is not attested at all with lpl/ex. In contrast, the much larger
database of the N T contains more examples where =tie is cross-referenced with
the subject, being either lsg or lpl/ex (cf. (980)). Since the N T text is largely
based on the Chambira dialect, the difference could be partly based on dialectal
variation. However, as variation also occurs within dialects, one might assume
that diachronic factors are at work. Speakers do not recognise any differences in
meaning between the two different markers.
83
Ron Manus (2002 p.c.) suspects that the variation occurring in the NT examples
involves a certain systematicity: regarding the six attested cases of kanakanu=na, he
suggests that 'all six of these carry a claim of distinction of speaker from others in
the context.' With respect to the 23 counts of kanakanu=ne, he assumes that they
'tend to state a feature of speaker's identity'. The variation with the lsg pronoun
'seems to reflect speaker preference'. However, Manus also mentions that the
variation occurs within the same speaker.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Position of dependent clauses 695
Interestingly, the same variation between =ne and =m is observed for the
subordinate marker. While it consistently appears as =rte in the NT, speakers of
the Espejo dialect use these two clitics in free variation (cf. §20.1.2). Even
though the focus markers are not semantically or functionally related to the
subordinate marker (and thus must be homophones), the parallelism in variation
could be accounted for in terms of phonological variation. This however, is not
supported by any rule-based alternation of this kind. With focus markers and
with the subordinate marker, the variant =na appears to gain dominance, i.e. the
use of =ne is becoming increasingly less common.
The following sentences illustrate the use of the different markers in
examples with different lps subjects. The introducer in (981c) refers to the first
verb ('let's take') and is followed by a jussive form, which does not require an
introducer (cf. §15.1.3). In (98Id), the verb for 'say' is not explicitly mentioned,
but implied by the PP to mean 'he spoke with his father-in-law'.
b) lpl/ex [Preceding: 'But as Lomai spoke like that, they said, "No, just do it right
here." And she replied: "No, we do not urinate here.'"]
kana temura-u=na hjam-tQaanu
[lpl/in edge-LOC=FOC: 1 pi] [urinate-lpl/ex]
[LOC] [V]
'We urinate at the edge of our [world].' [Lit. 'at our edge']
c) lpl/du [Preceding: 'So Lomai said: "Return its shell to me!" Therefore, one of the
men said:']
kwane=te kaa lejhn kari ama-aka=te hoara-kuru-mu
[let's=FOC] [this one shell] [take-1 pI/du=FOC] [see-PL-JUSS]
[INTR1] [Ol] [VI] [V2]
'Let's take this one piece of shell so that they [the others] would see it!'
d) lpl/in [Preceding: 'There, at the Airico River there was a man named Raimondo.
That man had set a trap in a place called Baharikinya and as he said "I will go to look
for it the day after tomorrow" and when his son-in-law said "Why don't we go
tomorrow", [they went]')
huara-a ku-a=ne ham, d$aha-l, ajane, ama-u=tge=te
[see-NTR go-3ps/D=SUB when] [come.on-PRT yes] [take-IMP=PLT=FOC]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [VI]
The focus enclitics =ne, =na, and =te can occur after any constituent and,
subsequently, are not restricted to appear after verbs. As could be expected, the
focus marker follows other clitics such as the reportative marker (cf. (982a):
su-a=he=te 'kill'-3ps/A=REP=F0C). However, when a focus marker is
attached to verbs, its position is not necessarily in the very last slot: As shown
in (982b,c), it can be followed by the emphasis marker =ra, which itself
occupies the final slot.
As mentioned in the introduction to this chapter, what I call focus here can also
have functions that go beyond a narrow definition of focus. In particular, this
regards the overlap of focus and topic. A clear example for the focus function of
the enclitic is found in (983). The lsg pronoun must be marked because it is
shifted into initial position. In this example, it marks contrastive focus, which
becomes clear through the context: kamt is emphasised in opposition to 'my
sister', whose function is mentioned in the preceding sentence.
[Preceding: 'Go away and catch my older sister', she said, 'She is the one sent for you.']
kanu=na hana+tgae paara kuseera=nuke letono ne-t
[ 1 sg=FOC: 1 sg] [besides+also] [2pl assistant=PURP envoy be-PRT]
[S] [ADV] [DEP]
rte-ü=ra
[be-lsg/E=EMF]
[V]
Ί instead, am sent to be your assistant.'
The examples (985) to (988) reflect further functions of the marker. In some
examples, focus and topic are not clearly distinguishable and the function is
determined by the context. Alternatively, both functions may merge and express
topic and focus at the same time. The examples cited below also illustrate that
the concept of "new" and "old" information is not relevant for the distinction, as
both functions (topic and focus) may occur with old or new information.
In (985a,b), all necessary background information is provided by the
repetition of the words describing the event. Thus, the clause marked with the
focus marker is referring to "old" information. The use of =te here could be
interpreted as focus, emphasising the event of going as the relevant action for
the arrival. Alternatively, one could argue that the event of going is the current
topic of the sentence. Thus, it remains undecided, with what function te is used
in this example.
b) Sentence 2:
ku-uru-a hau hetau=te, turu-uru-a ku-ure
[go-PL-3ps/D because HRS=FOC] [arrive-NTR go-3pl/E]
[DEP1] [V]
'As they went, they got to arrive.'
The constituents marked with =te in (986a,b) clearly refer to topic, which,
however, does not implicitly exclude an interpretation as focus or emphasis. In
both examples, a subject is shifted to the front. In contrast to the examples in
(985) these constituents represent "new" information, which is evident from the
context: (986a) functions as the title of a narrative; (986b) is the first sentence
of a narrative. Thus, the participants are only introduced here and are not known
from previous references.
a)
lejhii ranuna=te nitahe
[one girl=FOC] [get.lost:3ps/E]
[S] [V]
'One girl got lost' [title of story]
b)
lejhii kat$a=te miirjka ke katQa-uru kuti-hjai amia-rate
[one man=FOC] [working.session VLI man-PL invite-PRT] [work-CAU2]
[A] [DEP] [V]
O n e man invited people to a working session and made them work.'
[Preceding: (Speaker Α): Ί just said that I will leave tomorrow.' (Money was
mentioned about ten sentences earlier)]
kuriki kaute ke atti, lejhti ka=raj relor
[money rest VLI] [please] [one lsg=for watch]
[PP1] [ADV1] [01]
[Preceding: 'This isn't good. How can these plants grow nicely if there is no dew from
the night? Therefore, God said:']
lomaj=te hanonaa siiri-i-tQa ne=ra
[PSN=FOC] [night have-NOM-only] [be:3ps/E=EMF]
[CS] [CC] [V]
'Lomai is the one who has [power over] the night.'
It is evident f r o m the examples given above that the distinction between " n e w "
and " o l d " information is not encoded by the focus marker. However, also the
distinction between topic and f o c u s is not specifically marked, as it requires
background knowledge. Excerpts f r o m a conversation over short w a v e radio as
in (989) illustrate the overlap between focus and topic.
a) Speaker A (Question):
d^atoarn-a mtQae ikito-o, ta u-a elo=ne
[be.how:3ps/A] [there PLN-LOC] [NEGQ] [come-3ps/A] [rain=NEGF]
[VI] [LOCI] [INTR2] [V2] [S2]
'How is it over there, in Iquitos? Does it not rain?'
c) Speaker A (Reaction):
kahia-netonaj=te t$u hjä u-na heri-a elo,
[over.here-also=FOC CRTN just] [come-INF want-3ps/A] [rain]
[ADV] [V] [S]
d$atoama tQalti
["I.don't.know.for.certain"]
[idiom]
'Over here as well it looks as if it wants to rain, but I don't know for certain.'
Specifically, the use of the focus marker in (989) is associated with contrasting
one piece of information with another. The marker =te on the adverb
'yesterday' in (989b) appears to have two functions: It introduces a new topic,
thus the utterance is about "what happened yesterday". In addition, it puts focus
on the adverb, as the time of rain is in contrast to the present situation:
"Yesterday it rained (but not now)". In (989c), Speaker A changes the topic by
marking the locational adverb 'over here' with =te. Again, this seems to refer to
topic and focus: It is topic, because it implies that the general theme of the
utterance is the situation at the speaker's place. It is in focus, because it implies
a contrast to the situation in the listener's place (it has rained in Iquitos, but
there is no rain yet in the speaker's place). When asked to repeat his statement,
Speaker A then gives two different pieces of information in (989e): First, he
repeats his previous utterance, again using the locational adverb with the focus
marker. Secondly, he adds further information in two short sentences: In the
first part ('it rained yesterday over here as well'), no marker is used, which
could be due to the fact that =te already occurred in the previous sentence and
still is understood as the general topic. In the second part ('yesterday it rained a
lot'), the temporal adverb 'yesterday' is marked with =te. Again, this implies
both topic and focus: It is in focus, as the attention is drawn to the time of the
event, rather than the place, which is different from the preceding sentence.
However, it also makes 'yesterday' the theme of the sentence.
A distinction between given and new information as defined in the
introduction to this chapter is not explicitly marked in Urarina. In fact, the
marking of focus (with all its extended meanings) does not consistently coincide
with the notion of old vs. new information. A combination between all
functions is possible, as is illustrated by the following examples:
- Focus + new information: e.g. example (988)
- Topic + old information: e.g. example (1015c)
- Focus + old information: e.g. last sentence in example (989e)
- Topic + new information: e.g. example (986a)
A restrictive feature of focus markers is that they do not occur within imperative
clauses with 2ps reference. However, the imperative clause itself can be focused
when it is followed by another clause, (but not when the imperative is the only
clause of a sentence). By this, the clause that follows the imperative receives
consecutive reading, as is illustrated in (991). It should be noted that this
function is not observed with prohibitive constructions, which corresponds to
the general absence of focus markers in negative clauses (cf. §14.1). The
consecutive function of the imperative when followed by certain types of
dependent clauses is also discussed in §15.3. Note that a focus marker
frequently occurs after the hortative introducer hvane, which is illustrated in
(990).
b) [Preceding: 'As they were dancing, Lomai had to urinate and said:']
ka=jane-u-tQe=na hauria hia-ni=tg,a
[lsg=][let-IMP=FOC:lsg] [first urinate-DSTL.HORT=EMF]
[0=] [V] [DEP]
'Let me go so that I can go to urinate first!'
A consecutive meaning can also apply when the imperative is not implicitly
marked for focus, as illustrated in (992).
[Context: An elder encourages a man who is cutting a peccary to share the skin
generously:]
nii barii te-u huura=nuke
[that skin] [give-IMP] [increase=PURP]
[Ο] [V] [DEP]
'Give [him] more of that skin!' [Lit. 'Give that skin in order to increase [what he has]']
While the presence of focus markers is very common in this context, their use is
not obligatory, as the examples in (993) show. In these sentences, the subject is
marked only by the hortative marker on the verb. In (993a) 'let me get it', this is
indicated by the hortative suffix -e for lsg. In (993b), the same form is included
in the distal form of the verb, again with no marking for focus on the introducer.
a) [Preceding: 'There will be magnetic soil and beautiful axes that are like the ones we
have.']
mi hana d^atoanei hoane ra-e, na-t
[that when] [how] [let's] [receive-HORT] [say-PRT]
[CNJ] [DEP1] [INTR1] [VI] [DEP2]
b) [Preceding: 'As they were walking and listening [to the talking trees], one of them
had to go into the bush. As he had to go into the bush, [he said]:']
kwane hauria ahaena-ana ku-ni=tQa
[let's] [first] [bush-LOC] [go-DSTL.HORT=EMF]
[INTR] [ADV] [LOC] [V]
'Let me go into the bush first!'
As indicated, a focus marker does not occur within an imperative clause, which
is illustrated by (994a). An emphatic function of an imperative clause, however,
can be implied by the use of emphatic particles, such as läe in (994b); for its
function, cf. §5.15).
19.2.2 Questions
Most interrogative pronouns can take a focus marker, which implies focus
function for the respective constituent. In polar questions, focus markers do not
occur. The examples in (996) illustrate the respective combinations with a
variety of different content questions. Note that there is no formal distinction
between 'who' and 'what' (cf. (996a)). The factors that influence the
interpretation of +/- human reference in this regard involve transitivity, person
marking, and contextual aspects, which is further investigated in §21.1.1.
However, focus marking also is one criterion among others that supports the
correct interpretation of Since subject focus is more typical than the
marking of Ο arguments with =te, the presence of this marker after dza usually
• ο-j
indicates that the referent is human and thus interpreted as 'who'. An elicited
example is given in (995). Theoretically, a range of interpretations could apply
84
An A argument is more likely to have a human referent than an Ο argument is.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
706 Focus
a) 'Who'/'What' [Preceding: 'As it was clearing up, he sent one of his sons.']
d$a=te najpe-re hoar a-a ku-a=ne=ta,
[who=FOC] [be.able-IRR:3ps/E] [see-NTR go-3ps/D=CND=FRS]
[SI] [VI] [DEP1]
b) 'Where from' [Preceding" 'When he heard his children call him "Daddy", he was
happy and always asked his wife:']
d$a kahe=te kanaanaj eru-i=ta
[what from=FOC] [child] [find-2ps=FRS]
[PP] [O] [V]
'(From) where did you find the child?'
c) 'How' [Preceding: 'The people said: "Our hooks could not catch the fish". Therefore
the priest asked his novice:']
d$atoanei=te kuhiou-ure katQa-uru-ta
[how=FOC] [fish.with.hook-3pl/E] [man-PL=FRS]
[ADV] [V] [S]
'[But] how did the people fish?'
d) 'Where' [Preceding: 'He turned and saw them following and asked them "What are
you looking for?'"]
d$u=te ne-i=ta, katQa rela-era
[where=FOC] [be-2ps=FRS] [man teach-AG]
[LOC] [V] [S]
'Where do you live, Master?' [NT: John 1:38]
e) 'Why' [Preceding: 'As they were molesting him, the priest said" "Hey, it seems that
the people intend to kill me.'"]
d$anu=te kaaunei k-aj-te-kure=ta
[why=FOC] [like.this] [lsg=][AUX-INT-3pl/E=FRS]
[ADV] [ADV] [0=] [V]
'Why are you doing [like] this to me? ' [Priest talking to the people]
f) 'How possibly' [Preceding: 'As he was happy about having the children, he asked his
wife:']
d$asit=te katoane-1 it$a-i=ta
[how.possibly] [be.like.this-PRT] [do-2ps=FRS]
[ADV] [ADV] [V]
'How is it possible that you did it like this?'
It must be emphasised that all interrogatives used in (996) can also occur
without a focus marker. The presence of a focus marker merely emphasises the
focus function already implied through pragmatic factors - the universal
reference to focus by any content question.
The two words for 'how much/how many',y2ataha-ϊ a n d ß a a o h w a - l are not
attested with a focus marker. Morphologically, these have the same structure as
' h o w ' , consisting of a verb and a participle suffix. The reasons for the absence
of the focus marker with these forms are unclear, but could be due to their
generally low frequency.
In polar questions, the cross-referencing enclitics are not used. However, a
special focus function can be implied by the use of the interrogative marker
=na: While its regular position is after the verb, it can also occur on the first
constituent. In this case, it marks focus or emphasis in the same way as a focus
marker would do (also cf. §21). The difference is illustrated by the (elicited)
examples in (997a,b), which contrast from each other by the position of the
interrogative enclitic.
a) Regular position:
katai kurete-i=pa
fishing.hook buy-2ps=INT
'Have you bought fishing hooks?' [General inquiry]
b) Focus position:
katai=jia kurete-i
fishing.hook=INT buy-2ps
'Is it fishing hooks that you bought?' [Focus on object]
a) [Preceding: 'When they saw how others made their fields, they were surprised.']
riete ßäe akauru-netomj nerela-1, jiäe enene nitoanei
[but] [already] [3pl-also] [learn-PRT] [already] [nowadays] [like.that]
[CNJ] [ADV] [A2] [VI] [ADV2] [ADV2] [ADV2]
n=ukwana ha-ure
[3ps=field] [make-3pl/E]
[02] [V2]
'But nowadays already, they, too, make their fields like that, learning already.'
b) [Preceding: 'One man said, "What would happen if I slowly went with the paddle to
get (the axe)?'"]
rtii hau hetau=te leotga hoajtel,
[that because HRS=FOC] [other] [again]
[CNJ2] [SI] [ADV 1 ]
The pragmatic functions related to the front position of the subject in this case
again are ambiguous, since both focus and topic functions are implied here. On
the one hand, the enclitic could refer to topic, since 'the young people' have not
been previously mentioned in this text and it is plausible that the speaker now
turns to their situation. On the other hand, 'the young people' are in contrast to
'the old people', whose customs were discussed in previous sentences.
Therefore, contrastive focus is also implied.
Another example for the combined function of focus and topic is given in the
negative clause in (1000), where the subject is in preverbal position again, this
time preceded by a negative introducer, whose position can only be at the very
beginning of the clause. The 1 sg pronoun is in contrastive focus to 'the other
woman', mentioned before.
There is one construction that involves a focus marker and can precede a
negative clause: Expressions involving conjunction phrases, such as 'therefore',
'after that', or 'then' (cf. (1012)) frequently occur with a focus marker and can
be followed by a negative clause, as illustrated in (1001). The expression
mi häu=te in this example represents an element that has conjoining function
between this sentence and the preceding one and is not in the scope of negation.
Thus, the focus marker with this type of expression does not strictly violate
against the principle that focus markers do not occur in negative clauses.
However, subject agreement between the focus marker and the verb is still
marked and the presence of the focus marker requires the use of the Ε-form on
the verb. Thus, while the focused construction is not a constituent of the clause,
it still follows the concordance rule for cross-referencing. Since it is not in the
scope of negation, the co-occurrence of focus and negation within the same
sentence is compatible.
b) lps subject concordance: ['So (the patrones) kept our parents there and they live
there until now.']
mi hau=na kuaae kuriiti kuane itgau-akaanu ene netohwei
[that because=FOC:lsg] [there] [PLN inside] [live-lpl/ex] [now until]
[CNJ] [ADV] [PP1] [V] [PP2]
'Therefore, we live on the Corrientes River until now.'
a) Simple noun [Preceding: 'Therefore, they said: "It is not good that he [the spider
monkey] is chief.'"]
ruru=te najpe-re kuraanaa ni-a-ne=ra
[howler.monkey=FOC] [be.able-IRR:3ps/E] [chief be-3ps/D=CND=EMF]
[S] [V] [DEP]
'The howler monkey could be chief.'
c) Complex NP [Preceding: 'Nobody knows how they found those stone axes.']
ßoaelu ne-nakauru katQa-uru hetau=te eru-rehete
[earlier be-those.who man-PL HRS=FOC] [find-HABl:3ps/E]
[A] [V]
'The people who lived earlier found them.'
[Preceding: 'He [the black monkey] arrived and removed her shed and all that and told
the woman to send her husband to get jagua fruits; [then] he applied the jagua to her
[body] and said:']
mhjauria be-i=jx, kati=te kaa tokuanei
[don't] [tell-2ps=NEGF] [black.monkey=FOC] [this compared.to]
[INTR1] [VI] [A2] [ADV2]
Similar to the interpretation of the interrogative d^a (cf. (995)), when an object
is marked with a focus enclitic, it is distinguishable from a subject only if an
overt subject is present (in postverbal position), or from the context. For
instance, the example in (1004a), technically, could also be interpreted as 'Even
the canoes made it with stone axes.' This, of course is a rather unlikely
interpretation due to universal preferences in animacy, as human and animate
NPs or pronominals are more likely to be interpreted as agents of transitive
verbs. Example (1004b) exhibits a higher degree of ambiguity than (1004a),
since it could be interpreted as 'All kinds of [people] did it at first.' The correct
translation with 'all kinds' in object position is mainly conveyed by the context,
in which 'the ancient people' are mentioned at an earlier stage (namely, two
sentences before). Note that a focussed object can also have human reference, as
is shown in (1004c).
a) [Preceding: 'With this, some have learned to make their fields, but not all.']
enamhja ni natii=te itQa-kure mi aheri+ku-teru ke
[canoe even=FOC] [make-3pl/E] [that stone+ASC-axe INST]
[Ο] [V] [PP]
'They made even canoes with those stone axes.'
b) [Preceding: 'Those who hunted with a bow even had to make their bows.']
itulere=te itQa-kure=lu hauria
[all.kinds=FOC] [make-3pl/E=REM] [first]
[Ο] [V] [ADV]
'They made all kinds of things at first [i.e. in those days].'
Apart from the core arguments of the verb, any type of adjunct can be marked
with a focus enclitic (but recall that there is no formal distinction between
adjuncts and external arguments). This includes postpositions, adverbs, and a
unit that could be called "conjunction phrase" (cf. (1012)). Focus markers can
also be attached at clause level to the last constituent of a dependent clause (cf.
(1015)). Their use with imperatives was discussed in §19.2.1. One peculiarity is
that there also are a few examples for the occurrence of a focus marker within a
serial verb construction, as will be explained further below (cf. (1016)).
As a restriction, focus markers are not cliticised to particles. Instead, the
particles hjä and t$u follow the focus marker (cf. (1017)). There is one
exception: the hearsay marker hetau, where present, always precedes the focus
marker, which could be accounted for by the fact that hetau is a (lexicalised)
combination of two enclitics (cf. §12.3.5). Focus markers do not follow
introducers, except the hortative introducer hoane, where the presence of a
focus marker is very typical (cf. §19.2.1).
In (1005), examples for focused PPs with different functions are listed.
There are no restrictions as to the type of PP that can be subject to focus. Again,
recall that the clause-initial position of PPs is formally and functionally
unmarked. Therefore, the insertion of a focus marker in this environment
implies focus, contrast, topic, or any other kind of emphasis as defined further
above. In (1005a), =te is attached to a PP involving ke, which has valency
increasing function here, licensing the additional argument 'that (thing)' for the
quotative verb naa 'say'. In (1005b), the PP with ke has instrumental function.
In example (1005c) the "recipient" (which is a maleficiary here), is marked with
raj and followed by the focus marker. Other functions of PPs, such as location,
time, or comitative, are illustrated in (1005d-f).
a) Valency increase with ke [Preceding: '... and he turned into a fallen tree. Being a tree,
this sort ofthing,...']
η» ke-te komo+enua na-ι ajte-kure
[that VLI=FOC] [fall+tree] [say-PRT] [say-3pl/E]
[PP1] [Ol] [VI] [V2]
'They call that thing "fallen tree".'
b) Instrumental PP [Preceding: 'So her husband went to get a bamboo stick in order to
cut her.']
haurta ke hetau=te mi ita fiuaru-rehete-kure=lu
[bamboo.stick INST HRS=FOC] [that REC cut-HABl-3pl/E=REM]
[PP] [V]
'They used to cut each other with a bamboo stick.'
c) Beneficiary PP [Preceding: 'As the spirit said, "Come on, let's do it quickly", the
woman replied:']
hjauijiera, ka=kana raj=te nemuri kuane kalanoaae-ri-aka=ra
[no] [this=lpl/in for=FOC] [lake inside] [make.dirty-IRR-lpl/du=EMF]
[PART] [PP1] [PP2] [V]
'No, we would spoil the lake for us!' [To mean: Nobody will catch anything]
d) Locational PP [Preceding; Ά man had the people work for him, inviting them to a
minga, in order to clear [his field], [which was in a distance of] five hours by canoe.']
nii kahe=te turu-a u-e sonajpa
[that from=FOC] [arrive-NTR come-3ps/E] [afternoon]
[PP] [V] [ADV]
e) Temporal PP [Preceding: 'Therefore, the Urarina do not want stay without this.']
ena mtohioei=te ne ißono ku-1 mi ajpa ne-nakauru
[now until=FOC] [be:3ps/E] [ayahuasca drink-PRT] [that with be-those.who]
[PP] [V] [DEP] [S]
'Until now there are those who live with that, drinking ayahuasca.'
[Preceding: 'Besides, in addition to that, we build a school, if God wants, so that (for)
the children who are here can learn.']
esekwela raj=jiuke=te nelaate kalamina, material noble
[school for=PURP=FOC] [be.necessary:3ps/E] [zinc.roof material noble
[PP] [V] [S]
mrianaj
all. that]
'For the school, zinc roof, good materials, all that is necessary.'
Similar to PPs, different types of adverbs can be marked with a focus enclitic to
imply focus function. The sentences in (1007)-(1010) show examples for
adverbs that refer to location, time, manner, epistemics, and for the intensifier
hatai.
a) Locational adverb tahia [Context: from conversation about how they killed the
peccary]
tahia=na kua-ka ku-a nukuja-a-kaanu
[over.there=FOC: lpl] [wait-NTR go-NTR in.vain-NEG-lpl/ex]
[ADV] [V]
'We did no go to wait over there in vain [but we found the peccaries there and killed
them].'
There also are some temporal adverbs that are attested in combination with a
focus marker. This includes ena 'now' as shown in (1008), and there are
examples for a few others, such as jiäe 'already', heritQanehel 'as before', and
adverbs related to daytime or temporal distance between days (e.g. raka
'yesterday'). However, there are no attested examples for a focus marker that
would follow the time-related adverbs kuajtei 'again' and hajti 'still'.
b) Temporal adverb eresi [Preceding: Ί haven't seen it yet. I haven't found out whether
they finished my document.']
heriane eresi=ßa hoar a-a ku-re-u=m
[maybe] [tomorrow=FOC: 1 sg] [see-NTR go-IRR-lsg/E=ASS]
[ADV1] [ADV2] [V]
'Maybe tomorrow I will go to see.'
Another type o f adjunct that can be followed by a focus marker are manner
adverbs. Attested examples are found with rautohwei 'easily', 'calmly' (cf.
(1009a)), surutii 'quickly', hiniikn 'together', and with nitoanei 'like that', for
which an example is given in (1009b). Recall that these are actually participle
forms o f verbs, (some o f which may be lexicalised; cf. §5.3). The absence o f
examples with further manner adverbs might be incidental.
a) [Preceding: (1008a)]
rautohwei=te eno-a u-ri-ki=i
[easily=FOC] [enter-NTR come-IRR-2ps=ASS]
[ADV] [V]
'Easily you will enter.'
b) [Preceding: 'The people thought she had a baby from that spirit.']
mtoanei=te hatal eluna-i, hoaasißa käu hetau
[like.that] [very be.frightened-PRT] [fear-NOM because.of HRS]
[ADV] [DEP] [PP]
aj mi ranuna
[AUX:3ps/E] [that girl]
[V] [S]
'Like that, the girl remained very frightened and full of scare.'
The sentences in (1010) illustrate the use o f the focus marker after the epistemic
adverb heriane 'probably' and after the intensifier hatai 'very'.
b) Intensifier [Preceding: 'They did not see [the spirit]; only that sick person saw him.']
hatäi hetau=te banehelanaala nesoone nii kunajte-na
[very HRS=FOC] [totally] [be.scared:3ps/E] [that be.sick-NOM]
[ADV] [ADV] [V] [S]
'That sick person was absolutely scared.'
In the same way as the adverbs illustrated above, there are non-adverbial
adjuncts for time and location that can be followed by a focus marker. A few
examples are illustrated in (1011), involving different locational adjuncts, such
as NPs marked with the locative suffix -«, NPs with rem 'place', and a
temporal expression indicating a period of time.
b) Location [Preceding: 'They went and arrived at Lomai's place. There they said:']
hn, ii rene=te kanakaana letoa-e amu-naa+kioaaun-era
hey [2sg place=FOC] [lpl/ex] [send-3ps/E] [Walk-NOM+create-AG]
[LOC] [Ο] [V] [A]
'Hey, the Creator of Ways has sent us to your place.'
c) Period of time [Preceding: 'In the end, they brought him to Iquitos in order to have
the doctors cure him.']
huusa atene-i=te nerauta-e mi kunajte-na
[eight month-PRT=FOC] [get.better-3ps/E] [that be.sick-NOM]
[TMP] [V] [S]
'Within eight months, that sick person recuperated.'
The majority of focus markers in narratives are found after expressions that can
be called "conjunction phrases", as they are composed of more than a single
b) [Preceding: 'She converted the lower part (of the child) into a lizard.']
nii hau hetau=te ku kutuhja-e
[that because HRS=FOC] [there] [curse-3ps/E]
[CNJ] [ADV] [V]
'Therefore, she cursed [the child] there.'
Note that the focus marker always agrees with the subject of the verb which
follows it and that the verb takes the Ε-form. This was also demonstrated for the
examples in (1001), where it was shown that the conjunction phrase has
conjoining function, but is not part of the clause. The sentence in (1013) is
another example for this: The conjunction phrase is followed by a focus marker
for lsg with cross-referencing function to the subject marked by the personal
suffix on the verb.
A dependent clause can also function as a unit to which the focus marker is
attached. As discussed in §18.5, the preferred position for dependent clauses is
before the main clause, which makes them similar to adjuncts, with respect to
constituent order. Thus, when a focus marker is attached to a dependent clause,
the clause is in focus. Specifically, this emphasises the relevance of what is said
in the dependent clause for what follows. In (1014), examples are given for
dependent clauses that involve a conjunction, (which normally requires a
subordinate marker, but note that it can be omitted, cf. §20.1.2).
a) With häu 'because' [Preceding: 'Because the Urarinas work among themselves; they
are learning to work helping each other.']
mtoam-a=ne häu=te jiäe ne-ene enene,
[be.like.that-3ps/D=SUB because=FOC] [already] [be-NEG:3ps/E] [nowadays]
[DEP] [ADV] [V] [ADV]
b) With hau 'because' [Preceding: 'God said: "Go from here so that there be fish in
abundance for my children there, so there be (fish) in all little creeks, even in the
waterholes.']
na-a ofwa häu-na niki u-ü=ra
[say-3ps/D father because=FOC:lsg] [ADVRS] [come-lsg/E=EMF]
[DEP] [PRT] [V]
'Because my father said so, I have come.'
c) With hana 'when' [Preceding: 'Looking for her, they found her, when she ran
away.']
muku-uru-a-ne hana=te kuhjuri
[catch-PL-3ps/D=SUB when=FOC] [scream:3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'When they caught her, she screamed.'
c) [More than one DEP] [Preceding: 'They only bought the poison from town.']
raahemane hit$ana ha-l, ne-batohwi te-l,
[self blowgun make-PRT] [3ps=bow make-PRT]
[DEP1] [DEP2]
a) (Elicited)
lenone ari-a=te ku-e
[food] [seek=FOC] [go-3ps/E]
[Ο] [VI] [V2]
'He went to seek food.'
b) [Preceding: 'Beware therefore, lest that come upon you, which is spoken of in the
prophets:']
mtahi-a=te ku-ri-ki-tge=i, ßäe ku ti-a=ne bana
[get.lost-NTR=FOC] [go-IRR-2ps-PL=ASS] [already there give-3ps/D=SUB when]
[VI] [V2] [DEP]
'You will perish, at the time when he gives it.' [NT: Acts 13: 41]
Regarding the example in (1016b) above, it should also be taken into account
that the function of V2 is temporal/aspectual, as the form o f ' g o ' describes a
future event that could also be expressed on VI itself.
Instances of focus enclitics following the hearsay marker hetau have already
been observed in various examples (e.g. (985b), (998b), (1002c), (1010b)). In
contrast, particles such as the certainty marker tgu, the form hjä for 'just', ort
the adversative marker mki always follow the focus marker, when present,
which is illustrated in (1017) (also cf. §22.5).
b) With hjä:
turu-ni-u=he=te hjä ii hoara-htru-mn=t$a
[arrive-DSTL-IMP=REP=FOCj ust] [2sg see-PL-JUSS=EMF]
[V] [DEP]
'They say that you should just arrive so that they could see you.'
required. This corresponds well with the context, as the subject receives
emphasis, i.e. the listener is intended to focus on 'the patrons'.
The example in (1018b) is from a narrative that describes how the night was
created. It is the second sentence of the story, preceded only by the introductory
description of the situation (in square brackets). In this case, the division
between focus and topic is slightly less clear than in the other example, since
'like this' is less illustrative as a general theme for a statement. However, the
N P 'pure day' is in focus, being in contrast to 'night', mentioned in the
preceding sentence. Slightly different from (1018a), the NP is a copula subject.
A similar situation as in (1018a) is observed in (1019). Here, the conjunction
phrase for 'then' is in initial position and can be interpreted as topic. The
subject N P that follows, instead, is in focus and must be marked by =te as a
result of the frontshift.
a) [Preceding: 'Until today there are people in other groups who make their fields like
that.']
ajriu kuane ne-nakauru nitoanei=te
[PLN inside be-those.who] [like.that=FOC]
[A] [ADV]
laano+nuhua temu-i
[cassava+trunk plant-PRT]
[DEP4]
'The people of the Airico River used to make their fields like that, first throwing [the
felled trees] to the edges [of the field], [then] planting banana plants inside, [and]
planting cassava plants.'
b) [Preceding: 'This will be "tiatiae" [name of an unidentified animal] for that the
children would say forever, "I will go hunting when tiatiae sings", - this is how she put
it, speaking like this.']
adSa kanii eba ajjia nitoanet hetau=te ne=lu
[PSN GPF PSN with] [like.that HRS=FOC] [be:3ps/E=REM]
[S] [ADV] [V]
'This is how Adam and Eve lived.' [Lit. 'they lived like that.'] [End of story]
The example in (1020b) can be analysed in a similar way. Being the last
sentence of a story that describes one Urarina version of the flood, the subject
'Adam and Eve', is shifted to the front and functions as focus. Note that in this
narrative, the two characters play a crucial role and that the final sentence in a
way goes back to this theme. However, the adverbial 'like that' could also be
understood as being in focus; at the same time, it comments on the way Adam
and Eve lived.
In most examples discussed here, the merging of focus and topic functions
results into ambiguities or interpretations that can only be retrieved from the
context or background information. Although the examples indicate that
fronting of several constituents can be interpreted as focus being put on one
constituent and topic on another, this is not an automatic rule. While this
interpretation neatly applies to examples (1018) and (1019), the sentences in
(1020) may be interpreted differently. As becomes evident from the examples in
(1018), focus and topic function on the first constituent can also be combined,
which, however, is only interpretable from the context.
From the previous section it is apparent that each clause has only one focus
marker. As a tendency, the rule that only one focus marker can occur per clause,
is extended to the entire sentence, which in many cases contains more than one
clause (cf. §18.5). However, there are some exceptions to this, which will be
investigated in this section. It should be realised that only few examples exist
for each context given here. Therefore, one must take caution before
generalising these cases as stiff principles.
A construction that has already been discussed in §19.2.1 regards the
occurrence of focus markers after imperative clauses, by which a consecutive
function is expressed. In this case, a sentence can contain more than one focus
marker, as illustrated in (1021). It should be noted that the two occurrences of
=te in this sentence are in different clauses: The first instance is after
'finishing', whose subject is included in the preceding imperative (i.e. 2pl); the
second occurrence is after the lpl/in form of 'let us untie him', which is to be
interpreted as a hortative.
[Preceding: 'They delivered him [Lomai's son] and told him [the Creator of Ways]
[what Lomai had said].']
ku>ajtei najßa-ri-Ί lenone-ku-toe, najpa-ri-l=te
[again finish-RAP-PRT] [eat-IMP-PL] [finish-RAP-PRT=FOC]
[DEP1] [VI] [DEP1]
However, this is the only context in which two focus markers would occur in
one and the same clause. All other occurrences where two focus markers are
observed involve different clauses, but even this is rather unusual. Most
common among these exceptional cases is the occurrence of two focus markers
within a sentence where a quotation is embedded. In fact, the occurrence of two
focus markers in this context is unproblematic, as it can be understood as
involving two independent sentences. This is illustrated in (1023a), which
describes a situation from a narrative, where Lomai wants to bathe and sends
the by standing men away. The first marker occurs in the quotation 'it is
dangerous' (an idiomatic expression, which literally means 'want danger'); the
other occurrence of =te is after the clause in which this utterance is embedded
('she said'). The sentence continues with the reply of one bystander who refuses
to move. His reply is not embedded in a clause with naa 'say', but the focus
marker before his reply supports the switch of situation. Again, this is not an
obligatory occurrence of =te.
a) [Preceding: 'As one man stayed sitting there [as she wanted to bathe], she said:']
hjauißera, d^aha-l-tQa, na-1 naurutaae-ri-u=ra,
[no come.on-PRT=EMF say-PRT] [move-RAP-IMP=EMF]
[DEP1] [VI]
b) [Preceding: 'Then the priest told his novice: "Tomorrow let the people go fishing for
me.'"]
na-a hau hetau=te eresi hetau=te batiri raj
say-3ps/D because HRS=FOC tomorrow HRS=FOC priest for
that the markers are employed in order to make the change of f o c u s more
transparent.
Again referring to different subjects, two focus markers are observed in (1026).
The first marker, attached to 'therefore', relates to the general situation, as
described in the preceding sentence. The clitic =te after 'already', which
follows several dependent clauses later, can be interpreted as having focus
function. In this case, the marker is not directly related to the change of subject:
'As he taught them' (DEP1) is not marked with =te, but followed by two
participle clauses whose subject is expressed only on the final verb of the
sentence, and the second occurrence of =te is right before the main verb.
In summary, the occurrence of more than one focus marker within a sentence is
rare, optional, and the examples stated here do not really suffice in order to
formulate criteria that legitimate this use. Therefore, the following list of
contexts in which a multiple occurrence was observed, can be understood as a
summary of attested contexts, but must not be taken as a catalogue of principles.
Several focus markers within a sentence are observed:
- in imperative constructions with consecutive function
- in hortative constructions with introducer
- in clauses embedded as quotations in a descriptive clause such as 'he said'
- in separate dependent clauses with different subject
- in chaining/enumeration of interrogatives.
19.6 Summary
The marking of constituents with the enclitics =te, =ney and =na is a pervasive
feature of Urarina syntax and occurs with all types of constituents in positive
declarative clauses and in content questions. These markers are cross-referenced
to the subject marked on the verb of a clause and they require the use of the E-
form for person inflection. Their function ranges between focus and topic and
their interpretation considerably depends on the context. The insertion of a
focus marker is obligatory only with a frontshifted subject, except in negative
clause. A focus marker may occur after a constituent that is in its original
position, such as an object or an adverb. In this case, it tends to take focus
function.
From previous examples given in this grammar, it is obvious that many Urarina
sentences contain more than one verb. Since Urarina has a variety of formal
means to express different types of such structures, I will refer to these as multi-
clause constructions in general.85 These include dependent clauses, which are
subordinate to an independent clause in a variety of ways, and the coordination
of independent clauses conjoined with each other. As different types of
dependent clauses have to be distinguished, I use the term "subordinate clauses"
to refer to the specific constructions as described in §20.1. These involve the
subordinate marker =ne, whose functions extend to other clause types as well.
$6
For instance, =ne is also used as a different subject complement clause marker.
This construction, however, differs from subordinate clauses as defined in §20.1
in that complement clauses only occur with certain control verbs, whereas
subordinate clauses are not limited to any specific verb type to occur in the
main clause. Such subordinate clauses can be divided into those with or without
conjunction.
Urarina has three main types of dependent clauses, each of which has
different syntactic properties. The first section f this chapter will analyse clauses
that contain the subordinate marker =ne. Some suborcHnate clauses, which are
marked by =ne only, have temporal or conditional function, as discussed in
§20.1.1. When a conjunction follows, the meaning of the clause is determined
by the semantic content of the conjunction (cf. §20.1.2). §20.1.3 and §20.1.4
discuss further, minor strategies of subordination.
Complement clauses with same subject reference are found with a limited
number of verbs; the marker for this construction is -na and is attached to the
verb root of the non-finite verb (see §20.2.1). Complement clauses with
different subjects take the subordinate marker =tie, which will be discussed in
§20.2.2.
§20.3 deals with participle clauses, which involve a non-finite verb marked
with the suffix -7. Subsequently, person inflection is marked on the verb in the
main clause. Participles have a variety of functions, which include sequence,
overlap, or adverbial modification of events. §20.4 briefly introduces two
85 ·
Serial verbs are discussed in §17, since they are monoclausal. However, as they
contain more than one verb, they are partly included in the discussion here.
86
The distinction between same or different subject clauses applies to S and A
arguments.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
734 Multi-clause constructions
20.1 Subordination
The clitic =ne has a range of different functions. On the one hand, it functions as
a subordinate marker for temporal, conditional and complement clauses (cf.
§20.1.1). On the other, it can be combined with a conjunction, which may
express temporal, causal, concessive, comparative, or consecutive functions in a
dependent clause (cf. §20.1.2). All subordinate clauses are also distinguished
from other clause types morphologically, as the dependent verb always appears
with the D-form (cf. §11.1). As shown in §18.5, the position of the dependent
clause can vary. A subordinate clause may precede or follow the independent
clause; however, its occurrence before the main clause is clearly preferred.
With respect to the types of inflectional marking on the verb, there are minor
differences between subordinate and main clauses: Of all 17 suffixal slots that
occur in the independent clause only one is not attested in subordinate clauses:
the irrealis suffix -ri (cf. §12.2.14). In elicitation, its use in dependent clauses is
possible when the assertive enclitic =m is attached to the verb to mark future.
In general, the use of enclitics in dependent clauses is restricted, as
summarised in (1027). Only the remoteness marker =lu is freely attested in
dependent clause; the reassurance enclitic =tau only occurs as a component of
the lexicalised hearsay marker hetau in dependent clause (cf. (1027a)). There
are a number of enclitics whose occurrence in dependent clause can be viewed
as "acceptable" in elicitation (cf. (1027c)), but they do not occur elsewhere in
the text database. The enclitics of slots 18 and 23 are strictly excluded from
occurring in dependent clause (cf. (1027b)).
b) Not occurring:
- Politeness marker =t$e (slot 18)
- Interrogative =na (slot 23)
- Final negative =ne (slot 23)
c) In elicitation only:
- Assertive =m (slot 19)
- Witness evidential =ni (slot 20)
- Reportative =he (slot 21)
- Final emphatic =ra (slot 24)
- Frustrative =ta (slot 24)
- Warning =mare (slot 24)
- Fear marker =naate (slot 24)
- Rhetorical question =te (slot 24)
When the enclitic =ne is attached to the end of a clause without being followed
by a conjunction, its function can be conditional or temporal. However, the
distinction between these functions must be derived from the context. It occurs
with simple temporal, habitual, or conditional meaning, as will be investigated
in the following subsections.
In (1028a), the interpretation of the subordinate clause 'when they saw ...'
(DEP2) is clearly temporal and does not have any conditional reading. The
temporal function in this example, however, may refer to a period of time rather
than a single moment. Slightly different in (1028b), a punctual action at a
specific time is described by 'when he threw the fish into the canoe' (DEP3).
The fact that the event is real and happened once is evident from the context. In
this example, the punctual meaning refers to a short moment. Temporal function
is also implied by (1028c), which represents the title of a narrative. The
interpretation of =ne here is less straightforward: on the one hand, a temporal
interpretation is plausible. On the other hand, =ne could also be viewed as a
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
736 Multi-clause constructions
a) Time period:
mtoam-a=ne baja, nehelau ne-1 n=uhoana ha-na
[be.like.that-3ps/D=SUB after] [other.side be-PRT 3ps=field make-NOM
[DEP1] [DEP2]
b) Single moment:
ku ate muku-1, kaanii aresipe muku-uri-1,
[there fish catch-PRT] [sort.of mojara. fish catch-RAP-PRT]
[DEP1] [DEP2]
In contrast to temporal clauses, there are examples for the use of =ne (without
conjunction) that illustrate its conditional function. In (1030a), the event of
telling is a condition that has not been fulfilled, which excludes any temporal
interpretation. Its meaning in this context refers to the future. In (1030b), the
event described in the dependent clause is not in the future, but refers to past or
present ('if you tell/told the truth').
a) [Preceding: 'In the beginning, do not tell anything until you have taught ten women
(how to do it), he instructed her.']
be-i=j£=te, kamt nekuehe d$anu-ri-ki=i
[tell-2ps=CND=FOC] [lsg shame make.feel-IRR-2ps=ASS]
[DEP] [Main]
'If you tell, you will embarrass me.'
b) [Preceding: 'When he said that he has a wife from heaven, (the people) said:
"Really? Is this true?'"]
esijiae ajto-i-jie, d^aha-i ajane, raa-m-u=te hvara-ka
[truth say-2ps=CND] [come.on-PRT yes] [receive-DSTL-IMP=FOC] [see-lpl/in]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [Main] [DEP3]
'If you tell the truth, come on and get her, so that we can see her!'
Since the function of =ne as temporal or conditional depends on the context, the
interpretation is not always straightforward. In fact, many examples combine
these functions, as temporal and conditional reading may overlap. One is shown
in (1031), which leaves the decision open whether =ne is to be translated as 'if
or 'when'. On the one hand, =ne may describe a condition that still has to be
fulfilled, as the sentence describes a general rule. On the other hand, a habitual
temporal function is implied if the sentence is interpreted as past.
As seen above, in many cases the distinction between temporal and conditional
function of =ne is interpreted from the context. However, there is one factor that
helps to distinguish these functions. In some sentences that involve =ne, the
main clause may be marked for irrealis. In these cases, a temporal reading is
excluded and the clause involving =ne can be identified as having conditional
function. Though there are four logical combinations for the co-occurrence of
realis and irrealis forms (as stated below), two are excluded because the irrealis
form does not normally occur in dependent clauses. Type C is not relevant for
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Subordination 739
this discussion because it does not involve any irrealis forms - which leaves
only Type A.
While type A clearly is the common case for an involvement of the irrealis in
conditional clauses, there are no attested examples for type B. Type C basically
corresponds to the examples discussed in the previous §(20.1.1.2), where a
conditional function applies, without any involvement of the irrealis form. Type
D is a special case: In this construction, the irrealis is not morphologically
marked in the dependent clause; thus, strictly speaking, this type does not occur.
However, the insertion of a special conjunction in the dependent clause implies
irrealis meaning, as will be demonstrated in (1033).
The examples in (1032) illustrate case (A), where the condition expressed by
the dependent clause coincides with the realis form, whereas the result as
expressed by the main clause is marked for irrealis on the verb. Semantically,
both clauses have an irrealis meaning, since both events have not taken place
yet. In (1032a), the condition that Chunski arrives is not fulfilled, but irrealis is
not marked. Thus, two translations in English are possible, as indicated. In
(1032b), the assertive enclitic =m is added to the irrealis verb to mark future.
a)
H-a tgüki=ne=te, fioosu ha-re
[come-3ps/D PSN=CND=FOC] [pond make-IRR:3ps/E]
[DEP] [Main]
'If Chunski comes, he will make a pond.' / 'If Chunski came, he would make a pond.'
b)
eresi heelaj radio kuane be-re-ü-ni ere-naa
[tomorrow same radio inside telI-IRR-lsg/E=ASS] [speak-INF
[Main]
herit-tQäu=ne
want-1 sg/D=CND]
[DEP]
'Tomorrow I will tell over the same radio if I want to speak.'
The fourth logically possible combination (Type D) combines the realis form in
the main clause with the irrealis in the dependent clause. As mentioned, this
grouping is ungrammatical, as the irrealis does not occur in the dependent
clause. Instead, the irrealis mood in the dependent clause is expressed by the
conjunction hananiane ' i f . This conjunction indicates that the condition
expressed by the dependent clause is not fulfilled, but hypothetical. In other
words, the irrealis meaning of the clause is expressed by the conjunction; a
double marking of the irrealis (i.e. through a verbal suffix in addition) is not
possible. This is illustrated in (1033), where both clauses have realis marking
(i.e. no marking for mood). Even though in (1033a,b), the events expressed by
any of the clauses lie in the past, and all are imaginary/unreal, the hypothetical
status of the situation is expressed by the conjunction. In (1033 b), the introducer
baana, which always co-occurs with hananiane, further emphasises this
function.
(1033) Use of hananiane, realis form in the main clause; past reference
a)
kau m-anu=ne hananiane kusiti-anu
[here be-lsg/D=SUB if] [tie-lsg/A]
[DEP] [Main]
'If I had been here, I would have tied it.'
b)
baana najßatihi-anu hananiane kanu su-a hanolari
[if permit-lsg/D] [if lsg kill-3ps/A jaguar]
[DEP] [Main]
'If I had let it [attack me], the jaguar would have killed me.'
(1034) Use of hanamane, realis form in the main clause; reference to the present
Alternatively, irrealis can be marked in the main clause when the subordinate
clause contains hanamane. In all examples, the dependent clause can be
interpreted as referring to the present. The main clause in (1035a), refers to the
present, whereas in (1035b), future reference is implied by the main clause. The
presence of hanamane in the dependent clause emphasises the relevance of the
condition for the context, as transferring the money is an action entirely
dependent on the person's permission to proceed in this manner. In (1035c), the
main clause has past reference. However, the information about tense is not
formally encoded and can be derived only through the context. The examples
demonstrate that the reference to past, present or future is not formally marked
and thus has no impact on the form of the verb with respect to mood.
4. If the main clause is marked for irrealis (cf. (1032)), or if the subordinate
clause contains hananiane (cf. (1033)-(1035)), a conditional reading is
obligatory.
5. If the subordinate clause contains hananiane, the time reference depends on
the context: The sentence may refer to present (cf. (1035a)), past (cf.
(1035c)), or future (cf. (1035b)).
These findings are further summarised in table (1037). It is evident that any
indication of irrealis in either clause, being through morphological marking on
the verb or through hanamane, results in a conditional interpretation of the
dependent clause. When no marking is present, a temporal (including habitual)
or conditional reading is possible.
The construction with hanamane discussed in the previous section is only one
example for subordinate clauses that involve a conjunction. Urarina has a
variety of other conjunctions, which were introduced in §5.8. The functions that
are encoded by these conjunctions can be summarised in the following way:
- Related to time
- Related to cause
- Related to effect
- Related to counter-expectation
- Related to comparison.
The position of conjunctions is always at the end of the dependent clause, i.e.
they are preceded by all other constituents. Also recall that most conjunctions
may also function as postpositions (cf. §5.8). This section points out differences
and similarities between the various conjunctions as occurring in subordinate
clauses.
It should be noted that the use of the subordinate marker =ne is optional
before conjunction. When it is present, it may also be realised as the variant
The conjunctions ham and bana, which may both be translated into English as
'when', only slightly differ from each other in meaning. While hana describes
the punctual time of an event, bana is used to refer to a period of time.
However, the difference between the two is only relative, as becomes clear by
the examples in (1039). In (1039a), the precise time of the event 'when they
were going' cannot be indicated, but it is implied that the event described in the
main clause occurred at one specific moment. The use of hana in example
(1039b) is again punctual, since it is obvious that the first time of entering the
creek occurred at one specific moment.
a)
ku-he-uru-a hana=te muku-e akauru raj Unterem fiooko
[go-CNT-PL-3ps/D when=FOC] [burn-3ps/E 3pl POSS flashlight lamp]
[DEP] [Main]
'When they were going, the lamp of their flashlight went out.'
b)
haurianehei kaa ajtQune kuane enoa-akaanu=ne hana,
[at.first this Espejo inside enter-lpl/ex=SUB when]
[DEP]
m-ji=lu ne-naa-naha
[be-NEG:3ps/A=REM be-NOM-PURP]
[Main]
'When we entered the Espejo for the first time, there was no place to live.'
The use of bana, as shown in (1040a) differs from that of hana, as "the time
when I come" does not specify any particular moment. In the given context,
hana refers to the period of time the speaker will spend in town in order to
regulates his issues. In the same way, no specific moment is indicated in
(1040b), but 'at the time of our creation' refers to a period that is not defined in
terms of a punctual event, but represents the final statement of a narrative,
whose general time frame is briefly pointed out. Note that bana, as well as hana
may be used with any temporal reference, i.e. a dependent clause with these
conjunction may have present, past, or future reading.
a)
ßäe u-anu~ne bana=ne a\pa hua-re-ü=ni kanu
[already come-lsg/D=SUB when=FOC:lsg] [with see-IRR-lsg/E=ASS lsg]
[DEP] [Main]
'At the time when I come, I will see with him [what to do about the money].'
b)
jioaelu kana ne-hoaau-naa bana
earlier lpl/in ITR-create-NOM when
'Earlier, at the time of our creation' [End of a narrative]
Another "pair" of conjunctions is tonoana and najma, which both mean 'while'.
As suggested in §5.8.1, tonoana is used to refer actions or events that occur
parallelly on the timeline without implying contrast, najma, instead, is used
with contrastive function as expressed by 'whereas'.
a) tow ana:
hajti rautohwe-i m-aka=ne tonoana,
[still be.calm-PRT be-lpl/du=SUB while]
[DEP]
b) najnia:
mtoanei bi-a ku-uru-a eene-kuru=ne najnia hetau=te,...
[like.that tell-NTR go-PL-3ps/D woman-PL=SUB while HRS=FOC]
[DEP1]
a) baja 'after':
ku uhoana ha-ι setu-ahoa-a enua=ne baja,
[there field make-PRT] [rot-DSTR-3ps/D tree=SUB after]
[DEP1] [DEP2]
b) ahirtia 'before':
najße-ri-a, mtahe-si-a mi kuriki ahima
[be.able-IRR-3ps/A] [get.lost-CPL-3ps/D that money before]
[Main] [DEP]
'He could [transfer the money] - before that money gets lost (completely).'
c) reetiaai 'until':
hauria hitarii letpuyka-j katQa rela-i-jie reetiat,
[first all ten-NOMsbj man teach-2ps=SUB until]
[DEP]
mhjauria be-i=jie
[don't tell-2ps=NEGF]
[Main]
'Until you have taught all ten people, do not tell it!'
(1043a), the dependent clause with hau describes the reason for the fact stated
in the main clause. This sentence functions as a summary for the entire
preceding text, which summits in an explanation as for why the kinkajou carries
its creatures with the mouth. In (1043b), the subordinate clause again represents
the direct cause for the effect described in the main clause: The only reason to
choose the howler monkey to be chief o f the monkeys is that it lives in a single
tree rather than moving about.
a)
nii hau hetau=te nitoanei bua basihjau-a alau=na
[that because HRS=FOC] [like.that bag steal-3ps/D spider.monkey=SUB
[CNJ] [DEP1]
b)
nitoanei hetau=te enejtgu kuraanaa ne-ι ruru
[like.that HRS=FOC] [monkey chief be-PRT howler.monkey
[DEP1] [Main]
Manus (1992) also mention the word käu as a conjunction related to cause and
give the example as stated in (1044a):
b)
enua käu =te mhjau-e
tree because.of=FOC die-3ps/E
'He died because of a tree.'
The conjunction sajhjel 'although' (or variant asajhje~i) is used with subordinate
clauses to mark concessive function. Sentence (1045a) is an example for this,
taken f r o m a narrative where a woman warns her husband not to watch her
while she creates children through magic. In the course of events, the man
cannot resist and subsequently, is scolded by his wife, as shown in the example,
which highlights the fact that he disobeys even though she had warned him.
(1045b) again illustrates a case of refusal, where a man insists on taking home a
cannibal boy, who is to be his servant.
a)
i=tgej ajto-kwäu -ne sajhjel, d$anu=te k=ere towra-ene-i=ta
[2sg=for say-1 sg/D=SUB although] [why=FOC lsg=word obey-NEG-2ps=FRS]
[DEP] [Main]
'Why did you not obey even though I told you to?'
b)
lot ku)unu-he-uru-a=ne sajhjel ku d^una-l ama-a
[there beg-CNT-PL-3ps/D=SUB although] [there refxise-PRT] [take.along-3ps/A]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [Main]
'Even though they were pleading there [that he leave the boy], he refused [to comply]
and took him along.'
The conjunction rihihei (or variant rihei) is derived from the verb for 'be like'
and actually represents the continuous form of the participle. While other forms
of the verb rihia rarely occur in texts or conversations, the conjunction rihihei is
quite common. The subordinate clause in (1046a) is a direct comparison to 'the
way the peopled lived earlier'. In (1046b), a man promises his father-in-law to
seek revenge after the older man was nearly killed by a jaguar. The conjunction
is used to indicate that the revenge shall occur 'in the same way' as the jaguar
did. The function of rihihei is not strictly limited to the comparison of
situations, but may also imply an action that is to be taken as a result of the
event it is compared to (also see (1047)).
a) [Preceding: 'Then, those who live now cannot do such things because they do not
know them']
floaeltt aj-uru-a katQa-uru=ne rihihei itQa-ure-ni-a~na
[earlier AUX-PL-3ps/D man-PL=SUB like] [live-PL-NEG-3ps/D=SUB
[DEP1] [DEP2]
hau
because]
'... because they do not live in the same way as the people lived earlier.'
b) [Context: He sees his father-in-law bleeding all over his body from the wounds
afflicted by a jaguar]:
mtoanel i=fioitoa kurenia i=fu-a=ne rihihei
[like.that 2sg=trap for 2sg-beat-3ps/D=SUB like]
[DEP]
kanu kwaa-rü=tge=ra.
[lsg see-DSTL.HORT=PLT=EMF]
[Main]
'Like he [the jaguar] has beaten you for your trap, I shall see [for revenge].' [From
Airico dialect]
The comparative function of rihihei does not exactly apply in (1047), where a
translation as 'due to the fact that' would be more appropriate. It is difficult to
account for the fact that not a causal conjunction such as hau is used in this
example. The comparative factor in this case could be characterised in a way
that "compares" the two situations following each other: "In the same way as
(or: given the fact that) they are your family, talk to them".
For the other conjunction that has the meaning of 'like', 'in the same way as',
only few example are attested in the database, but numerous occurrences are
found in the NT. Going back to its lexical root, one could also render its
meaning as 'compared to' (as glossed here). This meaning applies well to the
example in (1048), where today's situation is compared to earlier times.
The position of the subordinate marker is fixed, as it occurs after the final
constituent of the dependent clause. In some cases, this will be after the verb
(including all verbal clitics), in others, after the subject, if expressed by an overt
NP. When a subordinate clause is in focus, the subordinate clitic precedes the
focus marker. When a conjunction is present, the focus markers occurs at the
end of the clause. If the hearsay particle hetau is part of the subordinate clause,
it follows the subordinate marker. Note that the subordinate marker is not
There are two conjunctions related to effect or purpose, positive hijßa 'so that'
and negative hoataa 'so that not'. The use of these implies intention as well as
effect, which makes it plausible to characterise them as having combined
consecutive and purposive function. As mentioned in §18.5, subordinate clauses
with these conjunctions preferably follow the main clause, whereas all other
types tend to precede it. The subordinate clause of sentence (1050a) describes
the intended result of an action, as it was Lomai's plan to turn the people into
water people and it was necessary to drown them for this purpose. Example
(1050b) is from a conversation over shortwave radio, where speaker A advises
the listener to take a motocarro (a motorised tricycle) on its way home. While
speaker Β assumes that this would be because of the distance, speaker A makes
it clear that his main concern are safety reasons, as the listener might get robbed
on the bus. Also note that the verb in a subordinate clause with huataa always
takes the affirmative form, as negation is expressed by the conjunction only
(also cf. §14.4.3). Though both examples given in (1050) refer to different
subjects in main and dependent clause, the two conjunctions can also be used in
dependent clause with a same subject interpretation.
a)
mtoanei hetau=te katg,a lemu-e=lu lomaj,
[like.that HRS=FOC] [man sink-3ps/E=REM PSN]
[DEP1] [Main]
b) [Preceding: (Speaker A): 'Be careful when you go home and take a motocarroV -
(Speaker B): 'Yes, I will, because it is far.']
kolektivo htane kau-a ku-i=jx kiuataa=na ajto-o
[public.bus inside return-NTR go-2ps=SUB so.that.not=FOC:lsg] [say-lsg/E]
[DEP] [Main]
Ί said it so that you would not go by public bus.'
Also note that the form haanu combines complementation with purposive
function. Even though haanu has some properties of a conjunction, its use
extends beyond that. For instance, it can also occur after a neutral form of the
verb, as is investigated in §20.2.4.1.
In the innovative language, the use of hau (lit. 'because'; cf. §20.1.2.2) in
combination with postpositions is a common feature. This construction may be
related to the function of hau as a kind of complementer used by younger
speakers (which is discussed in §20.2.4.3). Specifically, the following
postpositions can be adjoined to hau :
- ... häu raj ('for')
- ... häu ajßa ('with')
- ...häu rihihel ('like')
The sentences in (1051) from the innovative language illustrate their use. As
becomes evident, the combination of häu with the different postpositions has
different effects: With raj (cf. (1051a)), the actual meaning of häu as 'because'
is entirely retained, and possibly emphasised by the postposition ("for the
reason that ..."). In (1051b)), one could interpret the presence of ajßa in DEP1
as optional, as reason is implied ('because you want it'). In (1051c)), only the
meaning of rihihel is relevant whereas the presence of häu is obsolete and must
be regarded as optional.
a) With raj:
motokaro kuanaj=ßa kau-a ku-re-ü=m
[rickshaw inside=FOC=lsg] [return-NTR go-IRR-lsg/E=ASS]
[PP] [V]
b) With ajßa\
ii=te here-1 ne-i hau ajßa kau turu-akaanu hau raj
[you=FOC want-PRT be-2ps because with] [here arrive-1 ρ 1/ex because for]
[DEP 1 ] [DEP2]
naria mi kurenia
[thanks] [that for]
[IDM] [PP]
'Thank you ("for") that we have come here ("with") because you want it.' [From
prayer]
c) With rihiheT.
ßäe taum ajto-hväu hau rihihei nihjauria nekajritQa-i=jie
[already earlier say-lsg/D because like] [don't] [suffer-2ps=NEGF]
[DEP1] [INTR] [V]
kuriki siiri-i=jie
[money have-2ps=CND]
[DEP2]
'As I already said earlier, don't suffer when you have money!'
possible. Though the subordinate marker is not present, the dependent clause
has subordinate function.
a)
turu bana=na kwara-a ku-u
[arrive when=FOC:lsg] [see-NTR go-lsg/E]
[DEP] [V]
'When he arrived, I went to see.'
b)
enua keim-uru hana=te ausirijie raj komasaj
[tree VLI
go.up-PL when=FOC] [be.pregnant:3ps/E] [POSS wife]
[DEP] [V] [S]
'When they climbed up the tree, his wife was pregnant.'
a) With plural
mi hau =te amu-na najße-kur-em-a=ne hau,
[that because=FOC] [walk-INF be.able-PL-NEG-3ps/D=SUB because]
[CNJ] [DEP1]
As is obvious from the sentences in (1052) and (1053), these have different
subjects for main clause and dependent clause, which is a compulsory condition
for this construction. The (elicited) example in (1054) shows that this
interpretation also holds when both clauses refer to 3ps and lack an overt
subject. A reading with same subject interpretation is not possible here.
Note that the same interpretation is also possible with the inflected form of the
verb followed by subordinate marker and hana. Interestingly, hana conveys a
connotation for a different subject interpretation. Though this is not a strict rule,
it is observed in the majority of cases, as will be further analysed in §22.4.5.
This could explain the obligatory different subject interpretation in the
construction with the non-finite verb. For bana, not enough examples are
available in order to generate a similar hypothesis.
87
Only the insertion of the hortative introducer kwane would give this clause an
independent status.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
758 Multi-clause constructions
Urarina has two basic types of complement clauses, both of which occupy the
slot of an Ο argument. One involves the suffix -na, which is used for same
subject constructions (also called infinitive here, cf. §20.2.1), the other one is
with the subordinate marker =ne, which was already discussed in §20.1. Some
verbs in combination with =ne can refer to same subject or different subject,
depending on the person inflection in the dependent clause (cf. §20.2.2). Both
complementation types require the presence of a complement-taking verb (also
called control verb here) out of a limited set of verbs. While not all verbs that
are used as control verbs with =ne can also have control over an infinitive
clause, the two partially overlap.
As a rule, any complement clause with =ne or -na precedes the main clause.
Alternative complementation strategies, as discussed in §20.2.4, include several
related constructions with the purposive form haanu (§20.2.4.1), quotative
complementation with naa (§20.2.4.2), and complementation with hau , which
only occurs in the innovative language (cf. §20.2.4.3). A summarising overview
concludes this section s illustrated by the table in (1095).
CAU1: -a (slot 1)
CAU2: -erate (slot 2)
CNT -ahe (slot 4)
PLO: -naha (slot 7)
DSTR -akwa (slot 7)
RAP -uri (slot 8)
Most typically, however, the suffix -na is attached directly to the verb root. It
has a lengthened variant -naa, whose occurrence depends on a complex range of
factors, mainly involving word length. The exact conditions under which this
rule is applied are not entirely clear. The allomorphy leads to one complication
in the interpretation of the infinitive clause, as a similar alternation also occurs
with the nominalising suffix -naa, which can be shortened under equally
obscure circumstances (for an overview of the functions of this nominaliser, cf.
§6.6.3). In (1058), both suffixes have a short vowel and thus cannot be
distinguished by this feature. As nearly all control verbs for the infinitive are
transitive, the question may arise whether the suffixes for infinitive and
nominalisation could be in polysemy. The examples in (1058) illustrate the
conflict. As the two morphemes appear to be homophonous, one would wonder
whether a sentence such as (1058a) could be interpreted as Ί want (the) work' -
thus, an instance of nominalisation rather than complementation. The example
in (1058b), instead, shows the suffix -na as a nominaliser, here forming the
noun 'sick person', which functions as the Ο argument of the verb.
a)
amiane-na heri-tgäu
work-INF want-lsg/A
Ί want to work.'
b)
kunajte-na hoara-kau
be.sick-NOM see-lsg/A
Ί saw the sick person.'
However, while the suffixes appear to be identical at first sight, there are
significant differences between the two. More exactly, the ambiguity can be
resolved in two different ways. Firstly, there are examples in which
nominalisation of the dependent verb would not make sense from a semantic
point of view, as is illustrated in (1059), where -na is attached to the
Secondly and even more significantly, the two suffixes are indeed not
homophonous, as the transcription may misleadingly suggest. A difference
between the two morphemes is on the tonal level. While the entire complexity
of this difference has not been completely explored, one aspect can be
highlighted: the infinitive suffix is toneless and realised with a Low tone in
most cases, whereas the nominaliser carries a High tone. This is illustrated in
(1060): In the infinitive construction (1060a), the Η tone is on the first syllable
of the main verb (and the complement clause is toneless), whereas in (1060b), a
Η tone appears on the suffix -naa - which clearly identifies the nominalisation.
a) INF:
ere-naa heri-tQäu
speak-INF want-1 sg/A
Ί want to speak.'
b) NOM:
ere-naa heri-tQäu
speak-INF want-1 sg/A
Ί want the speaker.'
However, while the above example may illustrate the difference, the situation is
more complex than this, as tonal shifts may occur with the infinitive suffix, i.e.
with some verbs, a Η tone may fall on the infinitive suffix or on another syllable
within the control verb, as illustrated with kunajtena in (1061)). 88 In examples
where this is the case, an additional alternation takes place: The suffix is
consistently realised short as -na for the infinitive, but it occurs as the
lengthened alternant -naa for nominalisations (cf. (1061b)). One could view this
as a dissimilatory rule which is employed to avoid ambiguities.
88
The regularities for this have not been identified.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 761
a) INF:
kunajte-na heri-tQäu
be.sick-INF want-lsg/A
Ί want to be sick.'
b) NOM:
kunajte-naa heri-tQäu
be.sick-INF want-lsg/A
Ί want the sick one.'
While some questions may remain open regarding the details of this alternation,
it becomes obvious that the two morphemes are not two polysemic realisations
of one underlying morpheme, but represent different grammatical categories
and so are to be considered as homophones. This does not exclude the
possibility that they are diachronically related - which would be plausible.
Generally, there are no restrictions for the compatibility of same subject
control verbs with any inflectional categories. Limitations of compatibility may
involve regular, morpheme-specific exclusions, such as the fact that the CAU1
causativiser is only compatible with intransitive verbs (cf. §16.4.2) - but most
complement-taking verbs are transitive. In fact, the only intransitive infinitive
control verb is najma 'be able' (cf. (1065)), whereas all others are transitive.
The verbs that can take a complement clause with -na include the following
types:
- Verbs of liking: heria 'want', hiurahia 'desire', rautaa 'like' (cf. (1062))
- Verbs of thinking or knowing: huaauka 'think', ijiaa 'know' (cf. (1063)-
(1064))
- Verb of ability: najma 'be able' (cf. (1065))
- Verbs of beginning/ending: nunuetia 'begin', najßaa 'finish' (cf. (1066))
- Verb kvaasia 'be afraid' (cf. (1067))
Verbs of liking are typical complement-taking verbs and frequently occur in the
database. These include the verbs 'want', 'desire', and 'like'. Examples for each
of these are given in (1062).
here-ne
[want-NEG: 3 ps/E]
[V2]
'As they insisted, she still did not want to tell.'
b) kuurahia 'desire':
nakaauhwa-na kuurahi-anu
bathe-INF desire- lsg/A
Ί have the desire to bathe.'
c) rautaa 'like':
mi asajhjel=te here-lanaala, helaj ne-naa rauta-a=ne hau,
[that despite=FOC want-PRV] [separate be-INF] [like-3ps/D=SUB] [because]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V2] [CNJ2]
There are two verbs of thinking and knowing that can take a same subject
complement clause. The verb hoaauka refers to 'thinking' and can also imply
'remember' or 'be acquainted with'.
a)
maohioa-ur-i=ßa itQa-na hoaauku-ü
[ENUM-PL-NOMSbj FOC: 1 sg] [do-INF] [think-1 sg/E]
=
b)
t<^äe=na Uausura itga-na kivaauku-ü trertta wviembre ke
[also=FOC:lsg] [closure do-INF] [think-lsg/E] [30.November VLI]
[CNJ] [DEP] [V] [PP]
Ί am thinking of closing the school on 30. November.'
a)
n-itga-naa itga-na ipa-h-ene aka komasaj
[3ps-do-NOM do-INF] [know-CNT-NEG:3ps/E] [3sg wife]
[DEP] [V] [A]
'His wife does not know how to do her work.' [Lit. 'her doings']
b)
hja-naa ißa-ure, bahi-i naaohwa-na ißa-ur-eri-a
[urinate-INF] [know-3pl/E] [defecate-PRT] [ENUM-INF] [know-PL-NEG-3ps/A]
[DEP 1 ] [VI] [DEP2] [DEP3] [V3]
'They did not know [how] to urinate, [how] to defecate, all this.'
There is only one verb of ability, najrtia, which also has a high frequency in the
database. Note that this is the only intransitive control verb for same subject
complement clauses. Its meaning does not strictly refer to ability only (cf.
(1065a)), but may also imply possibility, as illustrated in (1065b).
a)
nii hetau=te, rüjej aj-ßa najni-si-ni-a=na häu,
[that HRS=FOC] [not.at.all AUX-INF be.able-CPL-NEG-3ps/D=SUB because]
[A] [DEP1]
b)
enene ßäe mtoanei ne-naa najni-ji
[nowadays] [already like.that be-INF] [be.able-NEG:3ps/A]
[ADV] [DEP] [V]
'Nowadays, this is not possible any more.' [Lit.: 'It cannot be like that any more'
(because they have forgotten the old customs).]
The transitive verbs for 'begin' and 'end'/'finish' can also be used to take an
infinitive clause as a complement. The verb najßaa 'finish', interestingly, is
related to najrtia 'be able' in that it represents the CAU1 form of this verb.89
a)
itga-na najßa-a
[do-INF] [finish-3ps/A]
[DEP] [V]
'He finished doing it.'
b) nunuetia 'begin'
sittra ha-naa nunueti-a
[bag make-INF] [begin:3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'She has begun to make the bags.'
89
Note that najßäi, the participle form of najßaa, is lexicalised to mean 'nicely',
'thoroughly'.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 765
While the verb hvaasia 'be afraid' can take an infinitive clause, there is another
transitive verb with a similar meaning, which does not function as a control
verb: huaaetoa 'be scared o f can be used as a transitive verb only, i.e. it takes
an Ο argument rather than a complement clause.
In (1067), the function of Jauaasia is illustrated. Note that in (1067b), the
main clause is a prohibitive clause in which the complement clause is
embedded. Alternatively, both examples given here could also be expressed
with the different subject complementiser =ne - as it may refer to either same or
different subject of the dependent clause (cf. §20.2.2.3).
b)
kwa kanu uhvana u-naa hoaasi-a
[don't] [lsg field come-INF] [be.afraid-NTR]
[INTR] [DEP] [V]
'Don't be afraid to come to my field.'
There are a few verbs for which it is doubtful whether these regularly function
as infinitive control verbs, as there are no attested examples in the text database,
nor in the NT. However, as these may occur in elicitation, I list them here,
leaving it open whether they are control verbs or not.
One such case is the verb transitive hiama 'leave'/'stop', which otherwise
can function as a control verb with different subject constructions (cf. (1082a)),
but it is attested with infinitives in elicitation only (cf. (1068a)). Verbs of
comparison are another type of verb that may occur with control function over
same subject complement clauses - but are only attested in elicitation.
Examples are given for tohiania 'compare' (cf. (1068b)), rihitoa 'be like' (cf.
(1068c)), and amunia 'be as i f (cf. (1068d)). 9 0 The verb bajtia 'forget' (cf.
(1068e)) is found with this function in elicitation and in a number o f N T
examples. Note that it is also attested as a different subject control verb (cf.
(1073b)).
a) hiania 'leave':
hihwu-na hiani-a-ü
[try-INF] [leave-NEG-lsg/A]
[DEP] [V]
Ί didn't stop trying.'
b) tokuania 'compare':
kwara-na tokuarn-anu
[see-INF] [compare-1 sg/A]
[DEP] [V]
'as if I had seen it' [Lit.: Ί compared to seeing it']
d) amunej 'be as if
na-a hau hetau=te mi bajahirii jiäe suru-naa amunej.
[say-3ps/D because HRS=FOC] [that soon.after already run-INF] [as.if]
[DEP 1 ] [DEP2 [V2]
'As she spoke (like that), soon after that he seemed to run away.'
e) bajtia 'forget':
hjaaöria kauatga itQa-na bajte-i,... naaohwa-t ne-i-tge=ne
[don't] [good do-INF] [forget-PRT] [ENUM-PRT] [be-2ps-PL=SUB]
[INTR] [[DEP1] [V1]]DEP2 [DEP3] [DEP4]
90
While the example for amunej is not actually elicited, the properties of this verb are
rather unclear. In the few natural examples, it always occurs in this form (amunej)
and thus seems to be a defective verb. A citation form or a form inflected for person
could only be observed in elicitation.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 767
hiane-h-tQe=ne
[leave-2ps-PL=NEGF]
[V4]
'Don't (PL) forget to do good and don't (PL) give up ... all this!' [NT: Hebrews 13:16]
a) Same subject
u-na heri-to-ann
[come-INF] [want-INTS-1 sg/A]
[DEP] [V]
Ί (really) want to come.'
b) Different subject
turu-a=ne heri-ji
[arrive-3ps=SUB] [want-NEG:3ps]
[DEP] [V]
'He (A) does not want him (B) to come.[Lit. 'arrive']
While the use of -na in (1069a) marks same subject constructions, different
subject complement clauses are formed with the subordinate marker =ne. Thus,
the interpretation of (1069b) as different subject is obligatory. In both cases, the
complement clause precedes the main clause. However, recall that =ne also has
temporal and conditional function - and that clauses with these functions may
also follow the main verb (cf. (1032b)). As a consequence, isolated examples in
which a dependent clause with =ne follows the main clause are interpreted as
temporal or conditional sentences rather than complement clauses. The example
in (1070) is thus to be interpreted as T h e howler monkey could, if he were the
chief.
Some verbs that function as control verbs for same subject constructions (with
-na) also occur as complement-taking verbs in different subject constructions
(with =ne). But while there is a certain overlap of these verbs in both
constructions, there are some verbs that function as control verbs with =ne, but
not with -na - and vice versa. For examples, some verbs of liking do not occur
with different subject constructions. In contrast, verbs of perception, such as
'hear' and 'see', and verbs of saying such as 'tell' are common with different
subject complement clauses but do not occur in same subject constructions. The
following verbs occur as control verbs over different subject complement
clauses:
- Verbs of liking: heria 'want' (cf. (1071))
- Verbs of thinking or knowing: kwaauka 'think', esenetaa 'believe' (cf.
(1072)), kuituhta 'know', bajtia 'forget' (cf. (1073))
- Verb hoaasia 'be afraid' (cf. (1074))
- Verbs of perception: aunaa 'hear', kuaraa 'see' (cf. (1075))
- Verbs of saying: bia 'tell/announce' (cf. (1076))
In addition, the construction for 'must' has control over a complement clause
(cf. §20.2.2.6). Similarly to same subject control verbs, there also are a few
different subject control verbs which are only attested in elicitation or in rare
NT examples, which are listed in §20.2.2.7. Note that I have included those
verbs that regularly and frequently occur in the NT in §20.2.2.2 to §20.2.2.5.
Different from infinitive clauses, there is only one verb of liking that functions
as a control verb with different subject complement clauses. While the use of
heria 'want' in this function is common, the verbs kuurahia 'desire' and
rautaa' like' are not attested in the same context.
a)
repete-käu =ne here-i=jia
[repeat-lsg/D=CND] [want-2ps=INT]
[DEP] [V]
'Do you want me to repeat it?'
b)
ita ajßa kauatQa-t ni-aka=ne here
[REC with good-PRT be-lpl/du=SUB] [want:3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'He wants us to be nice with each other.'
T h e control function of the verb hoaauka 'think' with infinitives has already
been described in the previous section. T h e example in (1072a) illustrates its
use in complement clauses with a different subject. In the same way, the verb
esenetaa 'believe' can be employed, while it is not observed in same subject
constructions (cf. (1072b)).
a) kwaauka 'think':
asia b=atane ke nekajritQa-akaanu=lu=ne huaauk-u-tge
[PLN ASCM-land VLI suffer- lpl/ex=REM=SUB] [think-IMP-PL]
[DEP] [V]
'Remember that we have suffered in Asia!' [NT: Acts 20:7]
b) esenetaa 'believe':
nii ajßa kuruataham-a kana+hoaaun-era=ne eseneta-uru-a hau
[that with help-3ps/D our.creator=SUB] [believe-PL-3ps/D] [because]
[DEP] [V] [CNJ]
'because they believe that Gods helps them with that'
T h e verb hvitukua ' k n o w ' differs from ipaa ' k n o w ' (cf. (1064)) both
semantically and functionally. While ißaa implies knowledge in terms of
ability or ways of how to accomplish things, the meaning of kuitukua involves
knowing in a manner of 'being familiar with', 'having come to k n o w ' . Only the
latter can be used as a different subject complementising verb (cf. (1073a)),
whereas the former is only found with infinitive clauses. Another verb related to
thinking or knowing is bajtia 'forget', which may also be used with infinitives
(cf. (1068e)). Both verbs have in common that they do not occur in the text
database with this function, but are very frequent as complement-taking verbs in
the NT.
a) kmitukua 'know':
na~i jnaelu ßaara rela-uru-a=lu=ne hoituku-i-tge
[say-PRT] [earlier 2pl teach-PL-3ps/D=REM=SUB] [know-2ps-PL]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V2]
'You (PL) know that they taught you earlier, saying so.' [NT: Matthew 5:27]
b) bajtia 'forget':
kuruatahane-ki-t(x=lH=ne bajte-ne-re=t kana+kwaaun-era
[help-2ps-PL=REM=SUB] [forget-NEG-IRR:3ps/E=ASS] [our.creator]
[DEP] [V] [A]
'God will not forget that you have helped [them].' [NT: Hebrews 6:10]
The verb huaasia 'be afraid' can be used with same subject as well as with
different subject complement clauses. Note that ki'aasia is also used as a
transitive verb with an NP as Ο argument otherwise. The sentences in (1074)
exemplify its use after the complementiser =ne. Different from other control
verbs, constructions with hoaasia plus =ne may also refer to a same subject
complement clause, as is illustrated in (1074b) (also mentioned in §20.2.1.5). In
this example, the variant with =ne is in free variation with the infinitive
construction.
(1074) Different subject complement clause with verb kwaasia 'be afraid'
a)
hoatia kana kaseteka-a=ne hoaasi-atga-a nijej
[don't] [lpl/in punish-3ps/D=SUB] [be.afraid-only-NTR] [not.at.all]
[INTR] [DEP] [V] [ADV]
'Do not be afraid at all that he would punish us.' [NT: Romans 13:5]
b)
raj kwitgam ra-uru-a=ne kwaasi-t$uru-a=na
[POSS blood receive-PL-3ps/D=SUB] [be.afraid-PL-3ps/A=INT]
[DEP] [V]
kau ne-j=te
[here be-NOMSbj=RHT]
[A]
'Are those who are here afraid of taking its blood?'
Verbs of perception do not occur with infinitive clauses, but they can be used
with different subject complement constructions in the Ο argument slot. The
t w o verbs attested in this function are hoaraa ' s e e ' and aunaa ' h e a r ' , (which
may also imply ' f e e l ' ) .
a) aunaa 'hear':
wawaho-a raana=ne auna-käu
[grunt-3ps/D w.l.peccary=SUB] [hear-lsg/A]
[DEP] [V]
Ί heard the white-lipped peccaries grunt'
b) hoar a a 'see':
ßäe nahauri-a u-a=ne hoara-1 hetau...
[already dock-NTR come-3ps/D=SUB] [see-PRT HRS]
[[DEP1] [V1]]DEP2
The verb bia 'tell/announce' is the only transitive verb of saying, whereas all
others are intransitive (cf. §9.5). While bia is not attested as a complement-
taking verb in the text database, its use with this function is very common in the
N T and in elicitation, where it occurs as a control verb for different subject
complement clauses.
Remarkably, bia can also be used as a control verb without the complementiser
=ne, as illustrated in the elicited examples (1077) and (1078). This is in so far
surprising as the use of =ne is obligatory with all other control verbs. There is
one parallel to the (optional) omission of =ne as a subordinate marker before
conjunction, which is very common (cf. §20.1.2). However, in that case, the
presence of a conjunction marks the clause as dependent whereas in the
examples below, there is no overt marking of dependency for the complement
clause.
a)
sini-uru-a be
[sleep-PL-3ps/D] [tell:3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'He told (that) they were sleeping.'
b)
obana kivara-a bi-a
[cl.peccary see-3ps/D] [tell-3ps/A]
[DEP] [V]
'He told that he has seen a collared peccary.'
Interestingly, the omission of =ne can also imply same subject meaning as
shown in (1078). Note, however, that the infinitive suffix -na cannot be inserted
in this example. Thus, from a syntactical point of view, the construction in
(1078) is identical to a serial verb. However, (1077a) shows that the
construction is not an SVC because plural is marked on Verb 1 and different
subject meaning is implied - which implies that there are two clauses. Also note
that the presence of =ne in (1078) would automatically imply a different subject
interpretation, i.e. 'that he is looking for peccaries'.
In example (1079), the presence of =ne and the fact that dependent clause and
main clause refer to the same subject, exclude the interpretation of =ne as a
complementiser. Instead, the dependent clause is interpreted either as a
temporal or as a conditional clause. The reason for this is that =ne with
complementising function always refers to a different subject in the
complement clause.
Another verb of saying that can take a different subject complement clause
(though only attested in elicitation and in the NT) is bahaa 'ask', as illustrated
in (1080).
is inflected with the D-form (which is identical to the Α-form in all examples
here), the sentences are structurally identical to other complement constructions.
In (1081a), the complement clause is marked for lpl/du and in (1081b) for 3sg.
a)
haurianehei enua ruku-aka netene
[first] [wood pull.out-lpl/du] [must]
[ADV] [DEP] [V]
'At first, we have to pull out wood.'
b)
m=hit$ana ti-a nerajjie
[3ps=blowgun give-3ps/D] [must]
[DEP] [V]
'They had to make their blowguns.'
It should be added that the 'must' construction differs in so far from other
complement constructions as 'must' is not a regular verb, but a (possibly recent)
construct. The form netene (or variants) only occurs as an impersonal form with
3ps reference. Person and number are marked on the dependent verb, i.e. in the
complement clause. If the second Iriel in this construction really is a form of the
copula (namely 3ps/E), it cannot be changed into any other person, which
implies that it is lexicalised.
Similar to some cases observed with the infinitive construction, there are
examples for verbs that only occur as different subject control verbs in
elicitation or in the NT translation. One example for this is hisenia 'dream',
which is only attested in elicitation (cf. (1082a)). The transitive verb hiama
'leave' has already been mentioned in the previous section. It regularly occurs
in the NT as a control verb with different subject constructions (cf. (1082b)).
a) kusenia 'dream':
itQa-a=ne kusem-tQäu
[do-3ps/D=SUB] [dream-lsg/A]
[DEP] [V]
Ί dreamed that he did it.'
b) hiartia 'leave':
mi=te ßäe nii ere-naa eseneta-uru-a=ne hiane-1,
[that=FOC] [already that speak-NOM believe-PL-3ps/D=SUB] [let-PRT]
[A] [[DEP1] [V1]]DEP2
As seen in (1082b), hiania may also occur with same subject reference even
though it takes the different subject complement marker =ne. It should be noted
that this is also observed with N T examples that contain verbs of beginning or
ending.
When the dependent clause follows the main clause, the ambiguity is dissolved,
because in this case, temporal or conditional interpretation is preferred.
There is a special form that is mentioned here even though it may not exactly be
characterised as a type of complementation, but which happens to occur
exclusively with such verbs that normally function as complement-taking verbs.
This form, which is marked by the suffix -erte (or allomorphs) on the verb can
be understood as a kind of nominalised irrealis form - or the irrealis form of a
nominalisation (IRN). There are three examples occurring in the database,
where this form is observed with the verb netoeka 'be in the mood'. 91 As
illustrated in (1084), the dependent clause (if it can be described as such) is
marked with -em or allomorphs to imply an unfulfilled action. In (1084a), the
irrealis form on 'follow' expresses the fact that the action of following is
unaccomplished and unreal. The dependent clause with hau in (1084b) is to be
understood as an innovative type of complementation or nominalisation 'what
he said' (discussed in §20.2.4.3). Here, it functions as an object of 'do', which
in turn is marked with the IRN suffix. In example (1084c), the presence of -ene
attached to 'throw away' again implies that the action is unaccomplished.
a)
hat ät saku-ene netoe-7a-ü
[very] [follow-IRN] [be.in.the.mood-NEG-lsg/A]
[ADV] [DEP] [V]
Ί was very much not in the mood to follow [God].' [Personal experience narrative]
b)
nijej ajto-a=ne häu itQa-nene netoe-?a-u
[not.at.all] [say-3ps/D=SUB because] [do-IRN] [be.in.the.mood-NEG-lsg/A]
[ADV] [[DEP1] [V1]] DEP2 [V2]
Ί was absolutely not in the mood to do what he said.' [Personal experience narrative]
91
Note that this verb only occurs as a complement-taking verb in one elicited example
and is therefore not listed in the previous sections. It probably is not a typical control
verb, but is commonly found with the form described in this section.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 777
c)
d^anuna tQaiti rtii baaso hau-ene netohwe-m-aka
[why ever] [that bad throw-IRN] [be.in.the.mood-NEG-lpl/du]
[INT] [DEP] [V]
'For what ever reason are we not in the mood to throw away those bad things ...? [From
sermon]
The idea that the form described above is an instance of nominalisation is based
on examples that are attested with a variety of other control verbs occurring in a
similar context. While all attested examples in the database occur with netoeka,
other control verbs that incur -ene in the complement clause (in elicitation)
appear to require a sort of subject agreement on the dependent verb, as is
illustrated in (1085). Note that these can occur in the negative or affirmative
form (examples (1085a,b) as opposed to (1085c,d)). For netoeka, no affirmative
examples are attested with the IRN form.
While there is not enough reliable data to formulate consistent rules, it appears
that with verbs other than netoeka, the IRN form always co-occurs with a
proclitic on the dependent verb, which provides clear evidence for
nominalisation. A similar type of nominalisation was also observed with the
(probably lexicalised) form of ' w h a t he said' n=ajtöohwa (cf. (§6.6.3). The
catalogue in (1086) lists the verbs that can control a nominalisation/clause with
the IRN suffix. Note that with this suffix occurring on the first verb, both verbs
consistently refer to the same subject.
The morpheme for irrealis nominalisation has several allomorphs: -ene, -nee,
-rtene, and -ße. While the variant -eve can be regarded as the underlying form,
-nee is attached to verbs that end in a long vowel or vowel sequence and to some
other verbs, particularly those with a root-final /a/, such as it$aa 'do'. 9 2 The
variant -pe is suffixed to verbs with a root-final I'll, such as Ma 'eat, sima
' s l e e p ' , or ima ' g o u p ' ; note that their final root vowel is lengthened before -ße
to result into [kiijie], etc.
92
Other verbs which take this allomorph include lauekoa 'be sitting', esenetaa 'believe',
räasaa 'dance', kwaasia 'be afraid o f , ajtoa 'say', and the irregular forms koaraa
'see' (to result into kwaa-nee), aunaa 'hear' (to result into aua-nee), and it$aa 'do'
(to result into itpa-nene).
a) Ο argument:
ßäe rautohwei nesari-tQuru-a=ne haanu eru-uru-a=ne hau
[already easily hunt-PL-3ps/D PURP] [find-PL-3ps/D] [because]
[Ο] [V] [CNJ]
'... because they already found [things] to hunt easily'
b) S argument:
ne-m-a kau-a=ne haanu enanihja=na hau ,
[be-NRG-3ps/D] [return-3ps/D=SUB PURP canoe=SUB] [because]
[VI] [SI] [CNJ 1 ]
nesoonete
[be.scared:3ps/E]
[V2]
'As there was no canoe so that he could return home, he was scared.'
93
A clause with haanu can also function as the A argument of a transitive clause.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 781
Another kind of use of haanu is after a verb which is marked with the neutral
suffix rather than any person inflection; thus, the purposive marker is attached
to a non-finite form of the verb. As discussed previously, the neutral suffix is
homophonous to the 3ps/A form, which is also used in serial verb constructions
(cf. §17). The example in (1089) clearly demonstrates that the clause does not
necessarily have reference to 3rd person. In this example, the reference in the
complement clause is to lsg ('what I am to say') and the presence of the neutral
form could be interpreted as a sort of impersonal marking.
ii baha-re-ü=m
[2sg] [ask-IRR-1 sg/E=ASS]
[02] [V2]
'If there is anything to say, I will call you, at the time as you said.'
kau-i=jie haanu ke
[return-2ps=SUB PURP VLI]
[PP]
'Buy fuel and bring it, two bins, for your return.'
b) With =na:
netei-tQa=na haanu ke ku enua te-i
[hang.up-3ps/D=SUB PURP VLI] [there] [pole] [put-PRT]
[PP] [ADV] [Ο] [V]
'... putting a pole there so that she would hang up herself
94
In combination with ke, the purposive marker also occurs as the variant haa (e.g.
(lb)).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 783
There also is a way to express locational purpose, which is realised by the form
-naha (or variant -neha). This form, which is attached as a suffix to a verbal
root, refers to 'a place to ...', such as illustrated in (1091). The phonological
similarity of this suffix with haanu is evident, as is the presence of [ne] (again
alternating with [na]), which corresponds to the optional subordinate marker
also observed with haanu.
Syntactically, a verb suffixed with -naha functions as a locational noun and
thus can be characterised as a nominalised verb. Note that a nominalisation with
-naha also complies with the properties suggested for locational nouns in
§5.1.2, (cf. table in (216)). For instance, it can occur with a demonstrative or
with a modifier, it may function as a head of an NP (also of a possessive NP),
and it can take the locative suffix -u. (However, it does not function as a
modifier itself).
As shown in (1091a), the suffixation of -naha to the copula results in the
noun 'place to be', which is frequently used to refer to one's village or
temporary settlement. In example in (1091b), the suffix is attached to the
transitive verb enoalaa 'cook', which in turn is embedded in a dependent clause
with the purposive/consecutive conjunction kiijpa.
a)
ßäe ne-naha kau-a ku-uru-a eene-kuru
[already] [be-LPP] [return-NTR go-PL-3ps/A] [woman-PL]
[ADV] [LOC] [V] [S]
'The woman are already going home.' [Lit. 'they return to their place']
b)
usi ha-anu m-a lertone enoala-naha=ne kujjia
[firemake-lsg/A] [be-3ps/D food cook-LPP=SUB so.that]
[Main] [DEP]
Ί made a fire so that there would be a place to cook food.'
not apparent difference between a verb such as ne-naha vs. ne-naa-naha 'place
to live' (cf. (365b); (546b) uhoana ha-naanaha 'place to make fields').
Another factor to be noted is the phonological resemblance of haanu to the
conjunction hau , which might be a coincidence. As a hypothesis, the two could
be diachronically related, as haanu expresses purpose and hau refers to reason,
which in a way describes a relation between cause and effect.
There also is a further purposive morpheme, =nuhe, which appears to be
phonologically related to haanu and combined with /ke/. However, while the
function of this form is clearly purposive, its distribution is less than clear.
Specifically, it can be cliticised to various different kinds of word classes. In
examples discussed in other chapters, it is found with the following word
classes, including inflected and uninfected forms. Occurrences of =nuke are
attested in the following contexts: attached to inflected verb (cf. (348a)), to a
verb root ((992)), to a noun ((983)), to the multi-function word kauatpa 'good'
in ((431a)), and following a postposition ((1006)). While no semantic
differences between haanu and =nuke seem to apply, the difference is
structural, in that haanu is more restricted with respect to its distribution. 95
The verb ma 'say' takes a quotation as its complement, but the quotation is not
followed by any subordinating marker such as =ne or -na. As illustrated in
(1092), the quotation always precedes the quotational verb, which perfectly
corresponds to the position of other complement clauses. While naa cannot be
described as "transitive" - it does not take noun arguments, it cannot be used
intransitively: a quotation always has to precede it. Further examples involving
naa occur throughout this grammar (e.g. (961c), (993a)).
95
Yet another purposive morpheme is the (rare) irrealis purposive suffix -nenu
(occurring in sentence no. (46) of Text 53 in the appendix), which expresses 'to be
done'.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Complement clauses 785
a)
kaa eri-anu=ne häu auna-i=jia
[this speak-lsg/D=SUB because] [hear-2ps=INT]
[DEP] [V]
'Have you ("this") heard what I said?'
b)
kuoaw=te ajto-a kana+kwaaun-era-ne hau auna-kaatQe
[let's=FOC] [say-3ps/D our.creator=SUB because] [hear-1 pl/in]
[INTR] [DEP] [V]
'Let's hear what God says!' [From sermon]
The table in (1095) lists all verbs that may occur as control verbs of a
complement clause. The two major types are distinguished into verbs that can
take an infinitive clause, which is marked by the suffix -na, and those that
control a different subject complement clause, marked by =ne. Even though the
irrealis nominalisation may not strictly constitute a type of complementation,
the third column of the table states whether the respective verbs can be used
with this form.
While I have sorted the different verbs according to semantic categories (as
shaded), it becomes evident that it is impossible to categorise these in any way.
For instance, no clear classification can be made for verbs that can control an
IRN form: there are some verbs in any semantic category, except for verbs of
liking, which can control an IRN form, but others of the same semantic type
cannot. Same subject control verbs are slightly more homogeneous, as all verbs
of liking and the two verbs of beginning and ending can function as same
subject control verbs, but verbs of perception and verbs of saying cannot. For
verbs of thinking and all other semantic types, their role is not homogeneous.
Different subject complementation is possible with most verbs listed here,
though some are only attested in elicitation or in the NT. Verbs of comparison
do not occur in this function and for most semantic types (except verbs of
perception), there also are verbs that cannot take a different subject complement
clause. Overall, a clear classification of Urarina complement-taking verbs is not
possible, as each verb may have different preferences, not tied to its semantic
class.
(1095) Summary of complement-taking verbs96
Verb type Verb Can take -na Can take =ne Can take I R N
Liking heria 'want' yes yes no
Liking kuurahia 'desire' yes no no
Liking rautaa 'like' yes no no
Thinking kzvaauka 'think' yes yes yes
Thinking esenetaa 'believe' no yes yes
Thinking hisenia 'dream' no (in EL only) no
Thinking bajtia 'forget' in NT and EL in NT and EL yes
Thinking kohivaelatoa 'be (in EL only) in NT and EL no
surprised'
Thinking/Emotion netoeka 'be in the (in EL only) (in EL only) yes
mood'
Begin/end numetia 'begin' yes in NT, yes
with SS ref.
Begin/end najßaa 'finish' yes in NT, no
with SS ref.
Comparison amuma 'be as if yes no no
Comparison tokoartia 'compare' (in EL only) no no
Comparison rihitoa 'be like' (in EL only) no yes
Knowing/ability ijiaa 'know' yes no yes
Knowing/ability najnia 'be able' yes no no
Knowing/ability kwitttkua 'know' no yes yes
Perception annaa 'hear' no yes no
Perception kwaraa 'see' no yes yes
Saying bia 'tell' no yes yes
Saying bahaa 'ask' no in NT and EL no
Saying tiaa 'say' no no no
Fear hvaasia 'be afraid' yes yes yes
Permission hiama 'let/leave' in NT and EL in NT, yes
'Leave' with SS ref.
'Must' tietene 'must' no yes no
96
Abbreviations used in this table: EL = "in elicitation"; SS = "same subject".
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
788 Multi-clause constructions
While the form I call "participle" here also may be characterised as "gerund",
"clause chaining", or "converb" in other terms, these all refer to very similar (if
not identical) phenomena, as is discussed in Genetti (2005). Based on the
analysis of the participle in Dolakha Newar (Tibeto-Burman), Genetti describes
the features of a participle in a way, which exactly match the characteristics of
07
the Urarina form under investigation (cf. Genetti 2005:40):
"(i) Two or more verbs or clauses occur in a sequence. Non-final verbs are
inflected with the participle; final verbs may inflect with the full range of
verb morphology.
(ii) The construction forms a chain of verbs or clauses whose status with respect
to the surrounding text is determined by the morphology on the final verb.
97
Further discussion on the typology of converbs/participles can be found in
Haspelmath & Koenig (1995).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Participle clauses 789
A majority of Urarina sentences that contain more than one verb involves the
participle form, which, to put it briefly, can be described as a non-finite clause
with same subject reference. The suffix -i can be preceded by certain suffixes,
as investigated in §20.3.1, including the continuous aspect marker, whereas
most other verbal categories are marked on the main verb. Most suffixes
occurring on the main verb also have scope over the participle, but exception
apply for those that may occur on the dependent verb itself, as will be shown in
§20.3.3. The participle suffix is compatible with any verb class. A finite verb
typically occurs at the end of the sentence, but it may also precede a participle
construction. On the semantic level, the participle can refer to a sequence of
events, an overlap of states, actions or events, or it may express adverbial
modification.
The underlying form of the participle suffix is -7, which occurs after all single
final root vowels and after diphthongs. With verb roots ending in a vowel
sequence or in a long vowel, the forms are irregular and depend on the
respective verb. For instance, with kuruae-ka 'be happy', the root structure is
retained and the suffix is realised as -hei (cf. (1097)). This allomorph also
occurs with the verb obaae-ka 'be angry', but here, the final root vowel is
deleted. With itQua-ka 'tie', /h/ is inserted between the two final root vowel
(and subsequently, /h/ is labialised, according to a general rule) and the suffix is
realised as -7. The regularities for these differences, if any, are unclear.
When combined with the intensifying suffix -to (cf. §10.2.310.2.2), the vowel
of the intensifier is assimilated and the resulting participle suffix is -tri, as in
kauato-a 'be nice', which becomes kauati-J.
As already mentioned in §12.4, the participle suffix -7 can be preceded by a
range of other verbal suffixes. These include both causative forms (-a and
-erate; slots 1 and 2), the continuous aspect marker (-ahe; slot 4), the
distributive suffix -ahoa and the plural object marker -naha (slot 7), and the
velocity suffix -uri (slot 8; cf. §12.2.8).
The use of the continuous aspect suffix implies a durative function, such as
exemplified by huara-ι 'looking' vs. hvara-he-ι 'watching'. In (1098),
continuous aspect and participle suffix are combined on the verb for 'pull',
• · that this
implying · process occurred over an extended period
· of time.
· 98
Note that a combination of the aspect marker with -7 is also observed in some
lexicalised derivations now used as adverbs, as illustrated in (1099). In these
words, which only occur in this form, the function of the component /he/ is not
transparent any more.
98
This form is not to be confused with the form occurring in kami-hei 'being like that'),
in which is the participle allomorph -he is used due to the final long vowel of the
root.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Participle clauses 791
kauatQahei 'nice(ly)'
satonohei 'in the end'
banetohwei 'too much'
heritganehei 'as before'
haurianehei 'at first'
herahehei 'side by side'
20.3.2 Compatibility
A participle clause can be formed with verbs of any class, without restrictions.
The examples in (1100) illustrate this with different verb types as listed in §9.
The example in (1098) already shows a transitive verb ('pull') with this form.
An intransitive active verb is shown in (1100a). In (1100b) - from a narrative
where a woman had to swim home, the stative verb seteeto-a 'be wet' occurs as
a participle clause. This example also contains a posture verb ('be sitting') with
a participle suffix. Verbs of shape and "affect" verbs may occur with the
participle in the same way as the colour verb for 'red' displayed in (1100c).
mi eerie
[that woman]
[S]
'Therefore, the woman moved swimming, become [very] wet in the water.'
c) Colour verb:
raj homaru kuane kwara-kuru-a hana
[POSS pleat.of.skirt inside see-PL-3ps/D when]
[DEP1]
The participle is also found with "special" verbs that do not belong to any
specific verb class, such as the copula ma, the auxiliary aja, and the
enumerative verb naaohwaa, which are illustrated in (1101).
b) Auxiliary aja:
aj-ahe-ί saku-e
[AUX-CNT-PRT] [follow-3ps/E]
[DEP] [V]
'She kept on doing it.' [The woman kept on urinating; from flood story]
20.3.3 Scope
As has become clear through the previous examples, person marking of the
subject is always expressed on the main verb, which thus has scope over the
main clause and the participle. In the same way, most suffixes occurring on the
main verb have scope over the participle clause. This is well illustrated by the
examples in (1102), where the scope of negation expressed on the main verb
extends to the participle clause preceding it. Note that are no attested examples
in which this would apply to a participle clause that follows the main verb, but
this could also be due to the general lower frequency of dependent clauses in
this position.
a)
nii hau hetau=te kuriae bahitguhioa kahe
[that because HRS=FOC] [distance toilet from
[CNJ] ([DEP])
b)
ktt hautohioern hoairi itQa-1 ne-ur-ene tabauru
[there truthfully ayahuasca do-PRT] [be-PL-NEG:3ps/E] [some]
[DEP] [V] [S]
'There some do not drink ayahuasca truthfully. *
hetau
HRS]
'Killing them all, he nicely killed them.'
ku raatiri
[there] [leave:3ps/E]
[ADV] [V]
'Laying them together there, he destroyed the Indios' house on top of them and left
them there.
sal
[all]
[A]
'Keeping on rowing like that, with [the hurt man's canoe] tied to his [own] canoe,
taking it along, when the son-in-law arrived [at the village], everybody saw him.'
The participle construction has a range of meanings, as the joined clauses may
refer to sequences, or to overlapping actions, events, or states. Participles are
also used to express adverbial modification. The interpretation of which
function applies in the respective context is not formally marked and must be
derived from the context; in some cases, several interpretations may be possible,
or a combination of these.
a)
su-1, ama-i na~i rtitaa jiäe fcw hajti turn-elanaala,
[kill-PRT] [take-PRT over.there over.there] [already there still arrive-PRV]
[DEP1 ] [DEP2] [DEP3]
ke usi muku-akaanu
[VLI] [fire] [burn-lpl/ex]
[PP] [Ο] [V]
'We killed [the crocodile], took it along over there at that place, and still not arriving yet
[at our destination], we burnt [= grilled] it on the fire.'
b)
usi itQa-l, ßae usi hoaauna-l,
[fire make-PRT] [already fire create-PRT]
[DEP1] [DEP2]
a)
ubaa-he-i hetau alau huara-a ku-e nii ttnee
[be.angry-CNT-PRT HRS] [spider.monkey] [see-NTR go-3ps/E] [that kinkajou]
[DEP] [Ο] [V] [A]
'The kinkajou got angry and went to see the spider monkey.'
b)
nii kahe ku-ahe-i kau turu-akaanu, atane ari-l
[that from go-CNT-PRT] [here] [arrive-2pl/ex] [land seek-PRT]
[DEP1] [ADV] [V] [DEP2]
'Going [on] from there, we arrived here, looking for land.'
a)
ni-a hetau lejhii katQa, lomaj beene ke komasaj-ki-Ί rn-naa
[be-3ps/A HRS] [one man] [PSN female VLI wife-VBL-PRT be-NOM]
[V] [S] [DEP]
'There was one man who had Lomai as his wife.'
b)
lejhii eene=te hana nitQataha-j fioanara siitQa-1 laueke
[one woman=FOC] [instead] [three-NOMSbj banana hold-PRT] [be.sitting]
[A] [CNJ] [DEP] [V]
O n e woman, instead, is sitting [there], holding three bananas.'
In other cases, the participle clause may express an overlap between different
actions or between states and actions, as is illustrated in (1108). Overlapping
actions are described in (1108a), where 'going up' clearly coincides with
' c o m i n g ' . In (1108b), the state of sitting is parallel to speaking, which can be
interpreted as an overlap of state and action.
a) Overlap of actions:
rauihirii kanakaana loanari helöo tgu hjä im-t u-akaanu
[calmly lpl/ex shed towards CRTN just go.up-PRT] [come-lpl/ex
[DEP1] [DEP2]
a)
rntoanei hetau=te nekajritQa-1 hatai kau-e nii lejhti katg,a
[like.that HRS=FOC] [suffer-PRT very] [return-3ps/E] [that one man]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V] [DEP3]
'That one man returned home suffering very much.'
b)
mtoanei hetau=te n=uhoana ha-ure-rehete jioaelu katga-uru,
[like.that HRS=FOC] [3ps=field] [make-PL.HABl:3ps/E] [earlier man-PL]
[DEP1] [Ο] [V] [A]
aheri+ku-teri ke kufwihja-1
[stone+ASC-axe INST fell-PRT]
[DEP2]
'The ancient people made their fields like that, felling [trees] with stone axes.'
The example in (1109b) also illustrates the use of verbs such as nitoama 'be like
that', which occur in their participle form overwhelmingly often. Further
examples for this include the forms niirihihe-i 'like that', the quotative na-i
'saying', and some other words which mainly occur with -7, but rarely with
other types of inflection. These may well be on their way of becoming
lexicalised.
DEP1 'healing him' may be understood as describing the first aid given to the
injured person. The subsequent clauses DEP2 to DEP4 are in a linear sequence
to the first event, which is again summarised by the main clause 'he healed
him'. The repetition o f ' h e a l i n g him' in DEP6 could be interpreted as returning
to the general theme of the sentence, also expressed by the main clause. DEP5
is a repetition or summary of DEP4. DEP7 refers to another event that follows
the actions described previously. DEP8 'caring for him', however, may be
understood as an adverbial modification, describing the way of how the healing
was performed. At the same time, DEP8 refers to an overlapping action with
'healing him'.
It is obvious that, without the knowledge of the images given in this
particular situation, it would be difficult to provide the correct interpretation of
the participle clauses in examples such as (1110).
a) Sequential function:
u-u=te läe i-muku-1 i=ju-aka=ra
[come-IMP CHNG] [2sg=catch-PRT] [2sg=kill-lpl/du=EMF]
[VI] [DEP2] [V2]
'Come and I will catch you and kill you!' [said to a jaguar]
b) Overlapping actions:
itQafwa-anu=ne hana, tiririhi-i obaae-ka hatiolari=ne hana
[shoot-lsg/D when] [roar-PRT][get.angry-3ps/D jaguar=SUB when]
[DEPl] [DEP2] [DEP3]
'When I shot, [when] the jaguar was getting angry, roaring,... [I looked down].'
c) Adverbial function:
aka=te läe helaj-tQa nelaurja-i it$au-e=ra
[3ps=FOC CHNG] [separate-only be.sitting-PRT] [live-3ps/E=EMF]
[S] [DEP] [V]
'He just lives in a single place, sitting there.'
b) Overlapping states:
ßäe lenone-he-uru-a, heena-i ne-ti-l
[already] [eat-CNT-PL-3ps/A] [be.four-PRT] [be-INTS-PRT]
[ADV] [V] [DEP1] [DEP2]
'They are eating already, being four [people].'
c) Adverbial function:
mi hana=te näi kahe kuriae rurute, enua siitga-l
[that when=FOC] [over.there from] [far] [walk:3ps/E] [tree hold-PRT]
[CNJ] [PP] [ADV] [V] [DEP]
'Then he walks [away] far from there, holding a stick.'
It is unclear what functional difference between the two positions might apply.
Interestingly, participles that follow the main clause do not automatically
express a sequence of events or actions, where the event described by the
participle clause follows the one of the main clause. This is clearly
demonstrated by the examples in (111 2a), where the selection of people
precedes the sending, even though 'counting' follows the main clause. As a
possible explanation, participle clauses that follow the main clause could be
viewed as afterthoughts. For (1112b), no sequence of events can be determined
as the clauses refer to overlapping states.
Interestingly, when a sequential interpretation applies, the dependent clause
tends to be understood as occurring first in the timeline (with respect to the
main clause), even when it follows the main clause. This is demonstrated by
(1113), where 'leaving the booty' occurs prior to entering the canoe. However,
multiple interpretations could suggest an alternative reading here, as 'leaving
the booty' could also be understood as an overlapping action, as to imply 'he
went away while leaving the booty'.
A s mentioned in §12.4, there are two further verbal suffixes that form a
dependent verb: the suffix -lat 'while' and the privative form -elanaala
'without'. In the same way as the participle suffix, the verb to which these
suffixes are attached is non-finite and refers to the same subject as the main
clause. Person is thus only marked on the main verb. The function o f the
respective clauses is according to the semantic content of the suffix. The
examples in (1114) illustrate the use of these forms. While -elanaala is attached
to the root of the verb, note that -lat follows the neutral suffix.
a) -lat 'while':
akau ra-a ht-a-lal bmo-a
[water receive-NTR go-NTR-while] [fall-3ps/A]
[DEP] [V]
'She fell while she was going to fetch water.'
b) -elanaala 'without':
kalaui muku-em-akaanu na-ι, kalaui muku-elanaala u-akaanu
[son catch-NEG-lpl/ex say-PRT] [son catch-PRV] [come-lpl/ex]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V]
'Saying "we did not catch its [the jaguar's] creature", we came without catching its
creature.'
The word tQäe differs from subordinate conjunctions in that is cannot co-occur
with the subordinate marker =m. Its position and function suggest that it is a
hybrid between adverb and conjunction, as it can have conjoining function
between two independent clauses or sentences, or between nouns. In both
examples of (1115), tQäe occurs at the beginning of an independent clause,
which follows another independent clause. In (1115a), tQäe refers to a similar
theme as the one mentioned in the sentence preceding it, as both sentences
involve 'buying' of different items. This also applies to (1115b), where the
actions described in the different clauses are thematically related: 'Making a
birth shed' and 'digging a hole' both are relevant preparations for giving birth.
b) [Preceding: 'As they were pregnant and had their baby, she applied magic and did
everything as the monkey had done.']
ku heritQanehel hata te-ι, tQäe atane bahe-~i,
[there as.before birth.shed make-PRT] [also] [earth dig-PRT]
[DEP1] [CNJ] [DEP2]
In (1116a), however, tQäe marks a change of theme: 'Bring money for my trip'
and 'tell Brother Santiago' are not thematically related; thus, 'also' refers to a
list of orders given by the speaker, as he asks the addressee to complete a
number of different tasks for him. Similarly in (1116b), tQäe does not imply that
the two sentences 'thank you for all that' and 'we must always rejoice' are
related actions or events. Instead, it marks the two sentences as both being part
of a wider theme, such as the prayer itself, in which a number of different topics
are addressed. These could be viewed as being related in that God is the
addressee.
nerajjie
must]
'Also, it says in the psalm, we must always rejoice [in] God.' [From prayer]
In (1117), tQäe again refers to the wider discourse. As 'come' has not been
previously mentioned in the discourse, the use of tQäe implies that 'also' may
refer to any action by the addressee, such as to mean 'It is OK that you look for
water wolves, but also come when I call.' A crucial difference to the previous
examples is, however, that tQäe occurs between a dependent and an independent
clause. Thus, the insertion is not meant to indicate a conjoining function
between these two clauses.
[Preceding: 'Yes, go ahead and look for water wolves, while I will check my tapir
trap.']
m-a d$a=ne e?eo-käu =ne tQäe u-u=tQe
[be-3ps/D what=CND] [shout-lsg/D-CND] [also] [come-IMP=PLT]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [CNJ] [V]
'If there is something, if I shout, also come!'
As with the examples where tQäe occurs between two independent clauses, it
has no syntactic function in (1117), i.e. its presence is not syntactically relevant
for the relation between the two clauses. Thus, it is plausible to conclude that
tQäe is in fact not a conjunction in the strict sense. Instead, it could be viewed as
having adverbial function. This view is further confirmed by the example in
(1118), where tQäe does not occur with reference to a clause, but precedes
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Clause coordination 805
There also are further peculiarities regarding the position of tQäe. One aspect is
its occurrence in sentences with a clause introducer. In this case, tQäe
consistently follows the introducer, as is shown in (1119).
b) [Preceding: 'When the baby's umbilical cord falls off, the father should go hunting.']
mhjauria tQäe kati saate-nana-a=ne
[don't] [also] [black.monkey] [kill.by.blowgun-ILT-NTR=NEGF]
[INTR] [CNJ] [Ο] [V]
'Also, he ought not to kill black monkeys.'
In the following example, tQäe is embedded into the clause, preceding the noun,
as was observed in (1118). In this case, it cannot be shifted to the front.
[Preceding: 'When you arrive in Lomai's land, there will be talking trees.']
ne-ri-tQa=i tQäe atane mamale-j
[be-IRR-3ps/A=ASS] [also] [land make.stick-NOMSbj]
[V] [CNJ] [S]
'There will also be magnetic soil... [and beautiful axes, just like we have.]'
In some examples, tg,äe co-occurs with hana (also used as a postposition for
'inside'), such as illustrated in (1121a): The combination of both words can be
translated as 'besides', 'by the way', or 'on the other hand' and implies a kind
of contrast between the first sentence by adding new, contrasting information to
the first one. In (1121b), hana t^ae refers to related actions, as the stump
(described in the preceding sentence) also stayed at a certain place - as does the
upper part.
b) [Preceding: 'As he felled the giant cassava, its stump stayed at the MarafSon river.']
hana+tQäe raj haberoko hetau=te kukana ne-ι neda-e=lu
[besides] [POSS body HRS=FOC] [sea be-PRT] [stay-3ps/E=REM]
[CNJ] [S] [DEP] [V]
'Instead also, its upper part stayed at the sea.
Through the examples presented in this section, it becomes evident that tpäe
does not have a function that could be defined as syntactic, similar to
subordinate clauses or participles. While the latter clearly mark the combination
of two clauses by morphological means that result in a dependency relation
between the clauses, this is not case here. t$ae does not "conjoin" two clauses in
the strict sense, but each clause could occur without the addition of tgae. It has
pragmatic function on the discourse level, which may not exactly refer to the
actions or events described in the clauses involved, but may also have scope
over a wider context, such as was illustrated in (1116a), where it implied a
chain of commands.
The word nete for 'but' can be used as a coordinator between independent
clauses. In contrast to t$äe, its position is fixed, as it can occur only as a
conjoining element between two clauses, but not within a clause. An interesting
peculiarity is that nete can be analysed as a morphologically complex form,
composed of the subordinate marker =ne and the focus marker =te - at least
from a diachronical perspective. However, this combination of two enclitics has
a)
tabauru=te niki kwituku-ure nete ßäe itQa-kur-ene
[some=FOC] [ADVRS] [know-3pl/E] [but] [already] [do-PL-NEG:3ps/E]
[A] [PARTI] [VI] [CNJ] [ADV2] [V2]
'Some [people] know [how to make the mixture], but they do not make it any more.'
The idea that nete is composed of the form =ne plus a focus marker is supported
by the fact that =te can be exchanged for another focus marker, according to the
subject marked on the verb (Recall that the focus marker exhibits concord with
the subject; cf. §19). In the (elicited) example (1123), the subject is lsg and the
second component of 'but' is =ne, which corresponds to the focus marker for
lsg. Accordingly with 1 pi, the form would be nena. However, the form nete
(where =te would be supposed to mark concordance with 2 nd /3 rd person) can
even be used even in contexts where the subject refers to 1 ps. It should also be
noted that an additional focus marker cannot be insert in sentences that are
preceded by 'but' - which further confirms the view that the second component
of 'but' is a focus marker (also cf. §5.8.3).
While it has been demonstrated that nete is composed of two different elements,
there are other aspects which support the view that nete is lexicalised:
1. If the component =te were to be defined as a focus marker, any verb
following nete would be inflected with the Ε-form for person marking. While
this is the case in most NT examples that contain 'but', the Α-form may also
be used in this context.
2. If the component =ne were to be defined as a subordinate marker, any verb
preceding nete would be inflected with the D-form for person marking - for
which there is no evidence.
Thus, it can be concluded that the forms for 'but' are at a late stage of
lexicalisation, where they still are partly transparent. In practice, however, the
combination of two morphemes is used as a single lexical unit. Interestingly,
younger speakers with an extended knowledge of Spanish also use the Spanish
word pero 'but' in their speech, sometimes even combined with nete.
There are two more constructions that could be regarded as alternative strategies
of clause coordination. The first one can be defined as ellipsis; it only occurs in
contexts where the quotational verb naa is elided, such as illustrated in (1124).
In this example, there is no finite verb that would refer to the subject, but a
quotation is simply inserted. The actual verb for 'say' (naa) is omitted, but
understood from the context.
by a sentence that contains two clauses marked with the Ε-form; in (1125b), the
Α-form is used. The two forms can also be mixed, i.e. have a verb with one
form in one clause and a verb with the other in the following clause.
a) With E-form:
ku ku-ure, raatiri-ure
[there go-3pl/E] [leave-3pl/E]
[Mainl] [Main2]
'They went there, and they left him.'
b) With A-form:
poaelu ena aja=ne tokuanet itgafwa ni-ji=lu,
[earlier now AUX-3ps/D=SUB compared.to] [rifle be-NEG:3ps/A]
[DEP] [Mainl]
kartutoo ni-ji=lu
[shotgun.shell be-NEG:3ps/A]
[Main2]
'Earlier, comparing to what there is now, there were no rifles, there were no shotgun
shells,... [all those things for hunting].'
a)
äafihe-j d^a he hirete-naha-ϊ, ku-atca uahei
[be.small-NOMsbj what VLI buy-PLO-PRT] [there-only until
[DEP1 ]
b)
Idabo kurete-1, semeto kurete-i, naaohwa-kat$e netene
[nail buy-PRT] [cement-PRT buy-PRT] [ENUM-lpl/in must]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [Main]
'We must buy nails, buy cement - all that.'
c)
akauru raj saabere ßae lerano ne-1 amu-e,
[3pl POSS machete already macana.üsh be-PRT walk-3ps/E]
[Mainl]
It should be noted that the verb naaohiuaa is not only used in enumeration of
clauses, but commonly occurs in contexts where NPs are listed (cf. §5.8).
In summary, coordination in Urarina can be regarded as a relatively minor
feature of the grammar, based on the following considerations:
1) Both words described as conjunctions in this section are not genuine
conjunctions, as t$äe also has adverbial function and nete is a lexicalised
form composed out of clitics with a different function. The use of a loan for
'but' by younger people could also reflect the need for an alternative to
express coordination.
2) The occurrence of these conjunctions in the database is comparatively rare,
which implies that they might not represent popular strategies to conjoin
As Urarina has a wide range of constructions that involve two or more verbs,
one may ask in what they these differ from each other. I will base this
comparison on participle clauses, as these are the most frequent type of multi-
clause construction in Urarina. Apart from formal and functional distinctions
between various constructions, there also are similarities. Serial verb
constructions, for instance, resemble participle clauses syntactically, in that an
SVC consists of a non-finite verb and a verb that indicates the subject and other
grammatical categories. A further feature both have in common is that they are
both same subject constructions. However, the crucial difference is that SVCs
are to be defined as a single clause, even though involving two verbs. Further
differences are to be found on the semantic level, as the function of serial verbs
strongly depends on the verbs involved. For instance, the presence of certain
verbs as VI in a SVC tends to imply directional, resultative, or puiposive
functions. Another aspect also is the restrictedness of SVCs in that only certain
verbs may occur as V2 (cf. § 17.2).
Subordinate clauses differ significantly from participles in many respects.
First of all, they can refer to a different subject than the main clause. Secondly,
they are finite clauses and require a specific type of inflection (the D-form), and
thirdly, they are always accompanied by some additional marking, which can be
a subordinate marker, a conjunction, or both. However, semantic similarities
with participle clauses may occur, as an overlap between different events,
actions, or states can be expressed by the conjunction tonoana (cf. (1041a)) The
functional difference between the two clauses is that subordinate clauses are
more explicit than participle clauses, especially as the latter do not formally
specify which of the possible functions applies. The choice between reference
to overlap, sequence, or modification entirely depends on the context, while a
subordinate clause with a conjunction specifically has the function as expressed
by the conjunction. In the example (1127), a participle form is used parallelly to
a subordinate clause, which illustrates the similarities and differences between
the two. The speaker starts with a participle clause (DEP1) and then adds a
subordinate clause (DEP2).
hja-ri-te
[urinate-RAP-INTS:3sg/E]
[V]
'They danced with her, and as they were dancing there, she suddenly had to urinate.'
There are two possible reasons for using this kind of structure:
a) A semantic distinction may be implied, as the DEP1 could mark the overlap
of the actions 'dancing' and 'have to urinate' - which is not expressed by the
subordinate clause.
b) The addition of a subordinate clause is necessary, because there is a change
of subject between the dependent clauses and the main clause. Again, the
switch can only be signalled by a finite clause - DEP2. Thus, the insertion of
DEP has both semantic and functional significance.
Complement clauses differ from participles in a mainly functional manner.
Same subject complement clauses, apart from bearing a different morphological
marking than participles, have a strictly complementational function, which
excludes any interpretation as sequence, overlap, or modification. The same
functions apply to different subject complement constructions, with the
additional difference in reference.
Juxtaposition as a coordinating strategy is relatively rare and the few attested
examples all refer to the same subject in each finite clause. The emphasis here is
on the listing effect of events, which could be interpreted as implying overlap of
states or events/actions. More data would be needed in order to determine the
subtle differences between finite clause juxtaposition and participle construction
with this function. The comparison between different constructions that involve
more than one verb is summarised in table (1128).
Urarina questions can be divided into several types, each of which shows
specific features. Content questions (cf. §21.1) contain an interrogative
pronoun, which is obligatorily fronted to the clause-initial position and can be
marked for emphasis in addition to that. As mentioned in § 11.2, content
questions require the use of the Ε-form on the verb. In contrast, polar questions
always occur with the Α-form. Interrogative marking for this question type is
realised through intonation and by the insertion of the enclitic =na, as is
investigated in §21.2. Negative questions, which are discussed in §21.3, are
identified through the use of a special introducer and the attachment of a final
negative marker in clause-final position. Rhetorical questions represent a further
type of question, as these are specifically marked with the enclitic =te in clause-
final position and require the use of the Α-form, as is demonstrated in §21.4. In
contrast to these different types, there is no formal way of distinguishing direct
from indirect questions, as in this case, the two clauses occur as independent
clauses in juxtaposition (cf. §21.5). - Another interesting feature related to
questions is the existence of interrogative verbs. These are investigated in
§21.6.
As stated in §5.9, Urarina has a basic interrogative pronoun d$a from which
most other forms are derived. Note that many of the interrogative pronouns that
contain d^a in some way can also be used as indefinite pronouns (cf. §21.1.11).
The interrogatives for 'how much', 'how many' are verbs, as will be
investigated in §21.1.10. The position of all interrogatives is clause initial.
Optionally, they can be followed by a focus marker. For convenience, an
overview of the different interrogative forms is given in (1129).
It can be assumed that some of the interrogatives listed in (1129) are lexicalised.
For instance, this is the case with d$u 'where': in this combination of d$a with
the locative suffix -«, the vowel /a/ is elided - which does not correspond to any
phonological rule. In fact, the combination of this suffix with the demonstrative
kaa results in the form kau for 'here'. Correspondingly, a combination with the
interrogative pronouns would be expected to surface as *d$au - which does not
exist. Thus, the form d$u clearly is a lexicalised form, while for the other
combinations, the evidence is not as clear as that. In the following sections, the
use and function of each of the interrogatives will be investigated.
Ambiguity may occur in many examples with d$a and a transitive verb; the
ultimate decision on the applicable interpretation may only be determined in the
light of the context. As mentioned in §19.3.1, the presence of a focus marker
usually gives a clue as to how a question with d$a is to be interpreted. When a
focus marker is present (cf. (1133a)), an interpretation of d$a as referring to a
subject is more likely; when there is no focus marker (cf. (1133b)), the object
reading may be preferred.
herardo kahe
PSN from
b)
d$a barasane ke=te kauatpa-i omaro-i
what dew INST=FOC good-PRT grow-PRT
'From what dew [will the plants] grow nicely ...?'
a) Possessive function:
d$a raj ka=teru
what POSS this=axe
'Whose axe is this?'
b) Beneficiary function:
d$a raj aj-aka nerajjie
what for AUX-lpl/du must
'For whom must we do it?'
With kahe, a directional meaning 'where from' is expressed (cf. (1136)). Note
that in this case, not the interrogative pronoun d$u 'where' (cf. §21.1.8) co-
occurs with the postposition, but d$a, whereas the locational function is only
expressed by kahe. The use of d$a kahe in (1136b) implies a question about the
source or origin of the child, thus the locational component can also be used in a
figurative sense.
a)
d^a kahe=te uu-re akau
what from=FOC come-IRR:3ps/E water
'From where would the water come?'
b)
d$a kahe=te kanaanaj eru-i=ta
what from=FOC child find-2ps=FRS
'Where have you found the child?'
The use of the postposition ke with d^a can have instrumental or valency-
increasing function, depending on the context in which it is used (cf. §16.5).
Example (1137a) illustrates the instrumental function ('with what'), whereas
(1137b) refers to an increase in valency ('what for' in this example). Also note
that emphasis can be expressed through the use of the interrogative enclitic =rw
(as in (1137a)), or by inserting the focus marker, such as in (1137b). Again, the
variation is based on preferences of younger vs. older speakers.
a) Instrumental function:
d$a ke=na itQua-h
what INST=INT tie-2ps
'With what have you tied it?'
b) Valency-increasing function:
d$a ke=te ne-laate-re nii hjane koloromi=ta
what VLI=FOC ITR-need-IRR:3ps/E that urine useless=FRS
'What would that useless urine serve for?'
a)
ku akuuhua itQua-hakua-uru-a hau, he, üra d$arihi=te=ra
there entrance tie-DSTR-PL-3ps/D because hey ERD which=FOC=EMF
b)
nii baja hvituku-era-i d^arihi tQäiti kureram-a
that after know-IMPS-NEG:3ps/A which ever replace-NTR
The interrogative for 'why' is d$anu. The component / η « / also occurs in the
purposive marker (haa)nu ke (cf. §20.2.4.1). d$anu is always followed by either
the focus marker =te or the interrogative enclitic =na. These two markers are in
principle interchangeable after d^anu, the variant with the focus marker is a
feature of the traditional language, whereas younger speakers prefer the variant
with =na. However, even with older speakers, there is a high degree of variation
between the two forms. Examples for each occurrence are given in (1139).
d$anu can be used in positive as well as in negative questions (cf. (1139b)).
99
The term bakaua 'Indio' has a negative connotation in Urarina and is usually
associated with hostile and cannibalistic groups of indigenous people.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Content questions 821
Corresponding to the intransitive verbs katoama and nitoama ('be like this'; 'be
like that'), which are combinations of demonstratives with the root /toane/,
there also is a verb d^atoama 'be how' (also cf. 21.6). Interestingly, the root
/toane/ itself does occur not in isolation, nor is there a verb *toania. However,
the combination of this root with the interrogative, resulting in d^atoane-ι, is a
participle form. Since the occurrence of d^atoanei is overwhelmingly frequent
as opposed to examples which involve the verb with any other kind of
inflection, one may assume that the participle form is being lexicalised and used
as an adverb, similar to many adverbs that contain a participle suffix. The
examples in (1140) illustrate the use of d^atoanei.
a)
d^atoanei torn kaa makina
how sound:3ps/E this machine
'How does this machine work?'
b)
d^atoanei kann auna-i=ßa
how 1 sg hear-2ps=INT
'How do you hear me?'
katoane-j itQa-i=ta
be.like.this-NOMsbj do-2ps=FRS
'As he was happy about the child, [he said], "How is it possible that you did something
like this?'"
100
While it would be plausible that, parallel to the variation occurring with d$anu, the
focus marker is a feature of the traditional language, it is unclear how the two
alternative markers might differ.
The interrogative form for 'when' is a combination of d^a with the word bana,
which is otherwise used as a conjunction 'when' and as a postposition meaning
'at the time when' (cf. §5.7.3). The use of d$abana is illustrated in (1142). It
can be used with reference to past, present, or future.
a) Past reference:
d^abana turu-e
when arrive-3ps/E
'When did he arrive?'
b) Future reference:
d^abana nakwaaunei kau turu-ri-ki=i
when again here arrive-IRR-2ps=ASS
'When will you come here again?' [NT: Matthew 24:3]
21.1.8 "d^u"'where'
d$u can have locational or directional meaning. The distinction depends on the
verb, as is illustrated below. In (1143a), the motion verb ' g o ' implies a
directional reference of d$u, whereas the verb 'sleep' in (1143b) assigns a
locational function to the interrogative.
a) Direction:
d$u ku-e
where go-3ps/E
'Where did he go?'
b) Location:
d$u sim-tge
where sleep-IRR:3ps/E
'Where would he sleep?'
The interrogative d^u can also be combined with tial, which has locational
function as a postposition, but temporal reference when occurring in reetiai (cf.
§5.7.2). The combination d$u tial can have either function, which is surprising,
as one might expect a locational function of d$u, which contains the locative
a) Locational:
d$u tiäi kweta-re-ü
where until clear-IRR-lsg/E
'Up to where would I clear it?' [asking about what parts of the field he has to clear]
b) Temporal:
d$u tiäi kaa iri-uru suu-re-1 ofwa
where until this creature-PL kill-IRR-2ps.ASS Dad
'Dad, ("until") when are you going to kill these creatures?'
a)
fladera-eri-Ί aj-aka=m nijej d^aeloo kam-a-ka
be.sad-DIM-PRT AUX-lpl/du=CND not.at.all what.way win-NEG-lpl/du
'If we do it sadly, we cannot win in any way.' [About playing soccer; lit. "we do not
win in any direction"]
The terms for 'how much' do not belong to the class of interrogative pronouns.
jiatahaa and ßaaohwaa are verbs, as the examples in (1146) and (1147)
illustrate. With the participle suffix -7, they are adverbialised and function as
interrogatives. The behaviour of these verbs corresponds to that of the native
numerals one to five, which are verbs as well (cf. §5.12). The functional
difference between the two is not entirely clear, but may be related to the
amount to which they refer (see below).
The examples below show the verb ßatahaa suffixed with the participle
suffix. In (1146a), the reply to the question 'how many' contains the numeral
verb for 'three', which also occurs with the participle form. The question in
(1146b) contains the interrogative pronoun d^a in addition such as to inquire
not only about the quantity but also about the object.
a)
ßataha-Ί siiri-i - nitg,ataha~i siiri-ü
be.how.much-PRT have-2ps three-PRT have-lsg/E
'How many do you have? - I have three.'
b)
ßataha-Ί d$a kurete-i
be.how.much-PRT what buy-2ps
'How many of what have you bought?'
Similarly in (1147), ßaaohwaa occurs with the participle form. Note, however,
while this form is the one most commonly occurring, both verbs may also be
marked with person inflection suffixes, such as with lpl to mean 'how many are
we?'
a)
ßaaohwa-i arusu here-i
be.how.much-PRT rice want-2ps
'How much rice do you want?'
b)
jiaaohwa-Ί ka=raj kuriki te-naa najße-U-toe,
be.how.much=GER lsg=for money give-INF be.able-2ps-PL
a)
ßaaohwa kilo ne-i
how.much kilo be-PRT
'how many kilo?'
b)
β ata kilo-i here-i
how.much kilo-PRT want-2ps
'How many kilos do you want?'
c)
ßaaohwa ne-i-t^e - mtgataha-akaanu
how.much be-2ps-PL three-lpl/ex
'How many are you? - We are three.'
Apart from the developing changes in function and use, a major challenge is the
distinction between the two terms used for 'how much'. Both words are
interchangeable for 'how much' or 'how many' and the judgements made by
different speakers appear to be contradictory. While some seem to prefer
ßaaohwaa for uncountable items, it is clearly used with countable items as
well. A possibility is that a former distinction referring to the feature [+/-
countable] or to individuality is being neutralised at the present state of the
language. Manus (2002 p.c.) thinks that ßaaohwa could be related to an
approximate quantity or value, as opposed to a more restricted way to ask for
quantity with βatahaa. As terms for 'how much' have little relevance in
traditional Urarina social life and are rarely used in natural language, it is
difficult to determine the difference at this stage. The preferred way to ask for
'how much' in terms of money is to ask for 'its exchange' (='price'), raj hire,
which can be used with d^a 'what'.
b) With d$abana:
hajti d^abana bakaua so-eni-a häu
still when Indio kill-NEG-3ps/D because
'As he [the boy] had never killed an Indio before, ... [his father was worried].'
c) With d$u:
nijej d$u ku-a-ü
not.at.all what go-NEG:lsg/A
Ί did not go anywhere.'
There are two suffixes which can be combined with an interrogative pronoun to
refer to indefiniteness. The suffix -elej can be attached to to express an
indefinite pronoun for 'something', implying a non-human referent. The
resulting form d^aelej also has the variants d^aalej and d^ale. The form -ne
(which is only found in this context, including the variants -nej and -m) can be
attached to the interrogative d$u to mean 'somebody', always implying human
reference. Possible realisations of this pronoun include d$une, d^unej, and
d$um. Examples for both forms are given in (1152). Interestingly, the form
d^une does no have any connotation related to location, as one might expect
from an inherently locational interrogative ('where').
a) d^aelej:
kana raj d^aelej be-ra ni-a=ne ke haaeko-aka
lpl/in for something tell-AG be-3ps/D=CND VLI look.forward.to-lpl/du
'When there is someone who promises us something, we look forward to it.' [Lit. 'when
there is an announcer of something for us']
b) d$une, d^aelej:
d^urd d$ale laati-a hana, nijej te-ni-aka=ne
somebody something need-3ps/D when not.at.all give-NEG-lpl/du^CND
'When someone needs something and we do not give [him anything] at all, ... [what
kind of behaviour is that?]'
a)
nijej d$uni kwara-?a-u
not.at.all somebody see-NEG-lsg/A
Ί did not see anybody at all.'
b)
akuuhua hwu-u eno-a d^une=ne huataa
entrance close-IMP enter somebody=SUB so.that.not
'Close the door so that nobody would enter!'
The negation of d^aelej is not attested in the same way, but it occurs in a
slightly different manner with negation. As illustrated in (1154b), this form
functions as a negative quantifier within an NP where it precedes the head noun.
Note that examples for this are attested in negative clause only.
a)
nijej d^alej katga
not.at.all somebody man
'No man was there.'
b)
m-ji kauatQa najjiehei, m-ji enua,
be.NEG:3ps/A pretty.nothing be.NEG:3ps/A tree
In addition to d^aelej and d$une, there are two related forms, expressing
indefinite pronouns for 'anything' and 'anywhere', respectively. The form
d^umhju, can be analysed as a combination of d$une followed by the locative
suffixes -hia and which is merged to -hju (in this word only; for more
detailed analysis of the locational suffixes, cf. §5.1.2 and §5.6.2, respectively).
a)
d$umhju kuri eru-i=jie ke im-ni-u=ra
anywhere jagua.treQ find-2ps=CND VLI go.up-DSTL-IMP=EMF
'If you find a jagua tree anywhere, climb it up!'
b)
d$alejßehel ari-a ku-e, ne-ni-a lenone=ne hau
something seek-NTR go-3ps/E be-NEG-3ps/D food=SUB because
'He went to look for something, because there was no food.'
b) As modifier:
d$unekoa kanaanaj-uru ne-he-t su-ι ki-tQe=i=tQa
someone child-PL be-CNT-PRT kill-PRT eat-IRR:3ps/E=ASS=EMF
'He will kill someone of the children and eat him.'
After some interrogatives that occur with the function of indefinite pronouns,
the word tQaiti can be inserted to mean 'ever', implying emphasis on the
indefinite meaning of the pronoun. For instance, d$a tQaiti is understood as
'whoever' or 'whatever'. This form also regularly occurs with d^u and d^arihi,
for which examples are given in (1157). Further combinations (not exemplified
here) are attested with d^abana, d^anu, d^atoarm, with d^a plus postposition,
and with äaka. Note that teiti is a variant used in the Chambira dialect.
akati-tQaa nerajtene
defend-lpl/du must
'If there is anything whatsoever against another [person], we must forgive 'that
person].' [Lit. 'if there is anything "for" another']
b) With d$u\
itulere u-elanaala ne-nakauru kuruatahane-u, d$u t^aiti ne-ure
all.kinds come-PRV be-those.who help-IMP where ever be-3pl/E
'Help all those who have not come, wherever they are.'
c) With d^arihi:
d^arihi tQäiti kioara-e
which ever see-3ps/E
'Which one (whatsoever) has he seen?'
Polar questions are marked with the interrogative enclitic =na, which is attached
to the verb in non-focus clauses, but to the first constituent in focus
constructions. The constituent order in polar questions is identical to that of
declarative clauses. In addition, a rise in intonation towards the end of the
question can be observed. As mentioned in §19.2.2, focus markers do not occur
in polar questions. However, emphasis can be expressed by the insertion of =na
after the first constituent. The examples in (1158) illustrate the regular position
of the enclitic. In (1158a), the verb to which =na is cliticised occurs after an
adverb and the Ο argument. In (1158b), the verb follows a dependent clause.
Note that in this example (from the contemporary language), the complement
clause is realised with häu, which formally makes it identical to a subordinate
clause (cf. §20.1.2.2).
a)
hanone mesahe auna-i=pa
morning message hear-2ps=INT
'Did you hear the message in the morning?'
b)
mi kujßa kana ra-a kana+huaaun-era=ne hau koituku-akat<?e=na
that so.that lpl/in receive-3ps/D our.creator=SUB because know-lpl/in=INT
'Do we [all] know that God has accepted us for that [purpose]?'
a)
u-ri-tQa=i=β a elo
come-IRR-3ps/A=ASS=INT rain
'Will it rain?'
b)
turu-ri-tQa=i=β a eresi
arrive-IRR-3ps/A=ASS=INT tomorrow
'Will he arrive tomorrow?'
a) After adverb:
esißae=na amu-a umberto
really=INT walk-3ps/A PSN
'Did Humberto really go?'
c) After Ο argument:
enejtQu=na kohwaite-i
monkey=INT desire-2ps
'Is it monkey that you want?' [Implied: 'not any other food?']
raj nuhue=na mi
POSS excrement=INT that
'Is that its excrement?'
a)
radiofwonia kujßa karta letoa-a baaba=ne hau te-i
shortwave.radio so.that letter send-3ps/D Dad=SUB because give-2ps
'Have you submitted the letter Dad sent in order [to get] the shortwave radio?'
b)
nahari ki-i tQu mid tako
liver eat-2ps CRTN ADVRS PSN
'But did you actually eat liver, Tako?'
The formation of negative questions was already discussed in §14.5. This clause
type is doubly marked: firstly, by the negative question introducer ta in initial
position and secondly, by the final negative marker =ne in clause-final position
(slot 23; for the exact position of =ne, see §12.3.6). The inflection on the verb is
affirmative, i.e. negation is not marked on the verb itself, but only through the
accompanying introducer and final negative enclitic.
a)
ta kure kivitukH-i=jie
NEGQ price know-2ps=NEGF
'Don't you know the price [of aguaje\T
b)
ta nahari heri-a ka=d^uhu-he-j=jie
NEGQ liver want-3ps/A this=be.standing-CNT-NOM sbj =NEGF
'The the one who is standing here not want any liver?'
Negative content questions are not attested in the database, but can be formed in
elicitation. In this case, the same structure as in content questions applies, but
with negative inflection on the verb. Optionally, the interrogative pronoun can
be accompanied by the adverb mjej 'not at all', which can precede or follow the
pronoun. The regular devices for negative questions, ta and =rte, do not occur in
this construction. Examples for the occurrence with 'what/who', 'where', and
'why' are given in (1164).
a) With 'what':
d$a (mjej) u-ene
what not.at.all come-NEG:3ps/E
'Who has not come?'
b) With 'who':
d$a (rtijej) kwara-ene-i
what not.at.all see-NEG-2ps
'What did you not see?'
c) With 'where':
(rtijej) d$u foi-ri-a-akaa=m
not.at.all where go-IRR-NEG-lpl/du=ASS
'Where will we not go?'
d) With 'why':
d^anu=m u-na here-kur-ene leotQa-uru
why=INT come-INF want-PL-NEG:3ps/E other-PL
'Why do the others not want to come?'
The rhetorical question marker =te (slot 24) has already been discussed in
§12.3.7. As stated there, it is related to surprise or curiosity in a question. The
clitic =te can be attached at the end of polar or content questions. Two examples
are given in (1167), in addition to the ones listed in §12.3.7. The co-occurrence
with the interrogative marker =na is very common. As in other questions, =na
may be attached to the verb (1167b), or to the first constituent (such as in
(1167a)). Note that in content questions, =na is obligatorily attached to the
interrogative pronoun. In polar questions, the insertion of =na is optional. The
polar question in (1167b) occurs without the interrogative marker, whereas it is
inserted in (1167c). Note that in this example, the verb is also marked for
negation.
a) With 'who':
kwituku-a-ü d$a tQäiti kurerani-a eno-re=l
know-NEG-1 ps/E what ever replace-NTR enter-IRR:3ps/E=ASS
Ί don't know who is going to replace him.' [Lit. Ί don't know. Who would replace
him?']
b) With 'when':
ka=raj be-u - d$abana u-ri-ki=~i
1 sg=for tell-IMP when come-IRR-2ps=ASS
'Tell me when you will come!' [Lit. Tell me! When will you come?']
c) With 'where':
d$u ne huliä - ta hoituku-i=ße
where be:3ps/E PSN NEGQ know-2ps-NEGF
'Don't you know where Julian is?' [Lit, 'Where is Julian? Don't' you know (it)?']
Apart from the various question types, Urarina has a few verbs with
interrogative function. These are pasia 'do how', d^atoama 'be how', tonaa
'sound how', and äaka 'be where'. The use of either of these verbs
automatically implies a question. While d$atoania and jiasia mainly occur in
the participle form where they are used as interrogatives for 'how', tonaa does
not occur in this form. The examples in (1169) illustrate the use of these verbs.
Note that different forms of person marking are possible with all three verbs;
however, occurrences with forms other than 3ps are extremely rare. While an
irrealis form can be observed with flasia in (1169a), it is unclear which other
grammatical categories can be marked on any of the verbs.
a) jiasia:
flasi-ri-akatQe=ta
do.how-IRR-1 pl/in=FRS
'What will we [possibly] do?' ['This man does miracles and we cannot blame him.' NT:
John 11:47]
b) d$atoama:
d^atoam-a nukue
be.how-3ps/A river
'How is the river?' [Referring to the water level]
c) tonaa:
tona-a kaa kuraa
sound.how-3ps/A this name
'What is the name of this?'
The intransitive interrogative verb äaka occurs only in the 3ps form to mean
'where is' and precedes the S argument (where present), which can be animate
(as in (1170a)) or inanimate (cf. (1170b)). Note that example (1170c) occurs
with a plural suffix on the verb to mark 3pl. However, this form is optional, as
3pl can also be referred to by using the singular form (cf. §8.7).
a)
äaka ririau
where.is PSN
'Where is Ririau?'
b)
äaka kanii ka=saabere
where.is GPF lsg=machete
'Where is that machete of mine?'
c)
äaka-uru tQäe leotQa-uru isköo ne-ur-i=ta
where.is-PL also other-PL nine be-PL-NOMSbj=FRS
'[But] where are the other nine?' [NT: Luke 17:17]
The verb äaka has the same function as any construction with d^u plus copula
(cf. §21.1.8) and there are no known differences between the two constructions.
In questions with 2ps reference, the only way to express 'Where are you?' is
with the construction involving d$u.
21.7 Summary
Features that are not normally part of the phonological system are commonly
used to emphasise dramatic events, or to "spice" the description of actions or
events, especially in narratives. Most typically, such exceptional sound patterns
occur in ideophones. This is illustrated in (1172a), where the speaker intends to
dramaticise the description of the way people hunt. The ideophone Ρεεε is
unusual, as it contains a glottal stop after consonant and a vowel not occurring
otherwise in the system, in order to imitate the sound of a rifle. The sentence in
(1172b), from a traditional narrative, reproduces the alarm noise made by a
certain bird whose beak was stuffed in order to silence him. In this case, the
muted attempt of croaking is realised with a final glottal stop.
a)
ahaena-ana amu-akaanu, nesari-akaanu, obana su-akaanu,
jungle-inside walk-lpl/ex hunt-lpl/ex cl.peccary kill-lpl/ex
b)
nii hau hetau=te ku hee+hee+hee+hee7 na-~i, kani
that because HRS=FOC there (muted.croak) say-PRT sort.of:3ps/E
'Therefore, [as his beak was stuffed], he made "hee ...".'
a)
baaba-kuru siitQura-uru-a hetau okäfiuo-oru ßoa(aa)elu
Dad-PL deport-PL-3ps/D HRS PSN-PL earlier
'In the old days, the Ocampo clan deported [our] fathers.'
b)
ku kuurahe-t ßaaau ßaaau ßaaau na-e,
there desire-PRT (desire) (desire) (desire) say-3ps/E
a)
n=asi kahe itQana tutuara+tutuara-ι, habaa+habaa+habaa-oki-i,
3ps=nose from blood RED+make.flow-PRTRED+RED+be.open.above-DER-PRT
b)
nii hau hetau ke balu+balu+balu-uki-t, kanaanaj rihitii
that because HRS VLI RED+RED+hold.on.to-DER-PRT child like
There are a number of syntactic properties that are typically observed in Urarina
narratives. While omission of constituents may occur, the insertion of syntactic
material is much more predominant, as demonstrated by the following list of
features commonly found in narration:
- Ellipsis
- Iconic repetition
- Tail - head style clause chaining
22.3.1 Ellipsis
Ellipsis mainly regards two aspects: firstly, the omission of core constituents
such as subject or object NPs, where this is acceptable in terms of grammatical
structure (cf. §18 to review the possible types of argument structure). Such
omissions can be observed in any text genre. Secondly, and more specific to
narratives, the quotative verb naa, which marks direct speech embedded in a
sentence, can be elided. In this case, there usually is some other marking to
mark a quotation. Most typically, this is achieved by the discourse particles he
and üra, which may mark a change of speaker and occur utterance-initially (cf.
§22.4.6). However, a quotation may also be introduced by other ideophonic
markers that indicate the beginning of a quotation. One example is given with
ha7 a in (1177a), which is not found elsewhere in the database, but clearly
introduces a quotation in this context. Example (1177b) contains a more
common ideophone, wa, which may express disagreement, disgust, or repulsion
towards a given situation. (Example (1177c) differs from the other two cases, as
no ideophone is used, but the recipient of the omitted quotational verb is
indicated as 'to his family'.
a)
satii amu-uru-a itQauena-uru=ne kureu, kanaanaj-uru-atQa ajßa
all walk-PL-3ps/D elder-PL=SUB in.place.of child-PL-only with
b)
kuruataha-uru-a hau, hatai ßäe baneheteuruni-a häu,
be.two-3ps/D because very already be.in.trouble-3ps/D because
c)
mi häu hetau turu-ϊ, mi n=arai-tg,uru raj,
that because HRS arrive-PRT that 3ps=family-PL for
As a third, but less common alternative, a quotation may occur without any
segmental marking in place of the quotational verb. However, in the few
examples recorded, this would usually involve a change in intonation or voice
as to indicate the switch from narration to quotation. The sentence in (1178) is
an example for this.
(1178) occurred several times in the narrative in order to stress the exceedingly
long travel two men had to undertake in order to take revenge at their enemy.
kau situ-e
here pass-3ps/E
'Therefore, again they went, and went, and went - it [the grass] was a little lower [and
so they asked] again, "How long ago did [the tapir] pass here?'"
b) Sentence 2:
hoara-a ku-a häu hetau=te ßäe hetau mki
[see-NTR go-3ps/D because HRS=FOC] [already HRS ADVRS
[DEP 1 ] [DEP2]
The sentence in (1181b) exemplifies the repetition of the final clause of (1181a)
as a participle. Note, however, that the hearsay marker hetau is inserted in
addition, in order to emphasise the reported character of the situation. The
repetition of the last "chunk" of (1181b) in (1181c) demonstrates that clause
chaining does not only involve the verb, but may repeat structures up to a
substantial length. The structures that are glossed as "Main" in (1181b), strictly
speaking, consist of two further participle clauses and a main verb, which I have
summarised as "main clause" in order to mark the repeated part as a unit.
However, one simplification can be noted in the repetition: in (1181c), the
words ml and nanaj are omitted. Such omissions, however, are optional.
b) Sentence 2:
ku hetau kurua-hei ku ra-1 ita rihiana-ϊ urwari
[there HRS be.happy-PRT] [there receive-PRT] [REC be.like-PRT urarixoot
[DEP1] [DEP2] [Main]
c) Sentence 3:
it a rihiana-i urwari ke belaj-uru-a hau hetau=te
[REC be.like-PRT urari.root VLI give.as.gift-PL-3ps/A because HRS=FOC]
[DEP]
Example (1182) again involves clause chaining with subordinate clauses. The
sentence in (1182b), however, does not pick up the final main verb of (1182a),
but repeats the quotative verb naa, embedded in a subordinate clause with hau.
b) Sentence 2:
na-a hau hetau, ku~i, ku-ure
[say-3ps/D because HRS] [go-PRT] [go-3pI/E]
[DEP1] [DEP2] [V]
'As he said so, going, they went.'
c) Sentence 3:
ku-uru-a hau hetau=te, turu-uru-a ku-ure
[go-PL-3ps/D because HRS=FOC] [arrive-NTR go-3pl/E]
[DEP1] [V]
'As they went, they got to arrive.'
a) Sentence 1:
asaru tajala-l=te nalu-e lejhii katQa, alberto na-a raj kuraa
avocado harvest-PRT=FOC fall-3ps/E one man PSN say-3ps/A POSS name
'[When he was] harvesting avocado, a certain man fell [down]; his name is Alberto.'
b) Sentence 2:
mi=te asaru taj-a ku-e raj daka ajßa
that=FOC avocado pluck-NTR go-3ps/E POSS brother-in-law with
'He went to pluck avocado together with his brother-in-law.'
c) Sentence 3:
taj-a=ne hana=te ne-fiuaufiuajte raj nune
pluck-3ps/D=SUB when=FOC ITR-break:3ps/E POSS branch
'When he was plucking [avocado], his branch broke off.'
101
The construction with hana as directly following the verbal root tends to imply a
different subject from the main clause (cf. §22.4.5). However, this could also refer to
'the man', as the subject of the main clause is 'they'.
the context, one can retrieve that 'going by canoe like that' refers to DEP4,
which describes a fishing scene. DEP5, however, is critical, as it is marked for
3sg and thus could be understood, as referring to the same subject as DEP4 -
which it is not. Instead, this is a case of absence of number agreement, which is
then corrected/specified in DEP6, which contains the plural form. The sentence
does not have a main clause, as the quotative verb naa, which would be
expected here, is omitted. Therefore, O u t of envy' implies that "they spoke out
of envy", followed by what they said.
22.4.4 No marking
agreed that ambiguities were evident. The sentence in (1186) is one example in
which the reference for some participants can only be recovered from the
context and through carefully making conclusions from rather subtle clues. For
instance, the subject of DEP1 can be determined with relative certainty as it is
likely to be identical to the one of DEP2 which must be 'kinkajou', given that
'spider monkey' already functions as the object. The same implications apply to
DEP3, where the subject can be assumed to be identical to that of DEP4. To
identify the subject of DEP4 as 'spider monkey', however, appears to be
entirely dependent on the thorough understanding of the ongoing story, as the
catching of the weaving stick could have been by either participant. The main
clause, in contrast, is unambiguous, as A and Ο arguments surface.
however, becomes clear only through knowing that this procedure occurred
before in discourse and that Adam is the one who catches the fish and puts them
onto the son's tongue.
a)
hana t$äe hirirüßo ma natu muku-1, enamhja kuane
[inside also] [bagreS]ish even catch-PRT] [canoe inside
[CNJ] [DEP1] [DEP2]
b)
mi hau hetau=te ku kuru-ri-i nakwaaunei
[that because HRS=FOC] [there swallow-RAP-PRT] [again
[CNJ] [DEP1] ([QUOT])
lele tohvete
[tongue lay:3ps/E]
[Main]
'Therefore, he [the son] quickly swallowed [the fish] and as he [the son] said, "Do it
again!" he [Adam] again caught a fish quickly and put it on his [the son's] tongue.'
The interpretation of some clauses can be even more complicated when the
participants have to be derived through general knowledge of situations as the
one depicted in (1188), where at no point it is mentioned who or what was left -
neither in the preceding sentences of the stoiy, nor in the title. Even the
sentence following the displayed example gives no clue as to what could be the
subject: 'As they left [him], [he] got scared, because there was no canoe in
order to return home.'
T o account for the semantic and functional difference between the two most
frequently used conjunctions hau 'because' and hana ' w h e n ' , is a challenge.
The problem lies in the fact that these two do not always match the meaning as
given above. For instance, hau cannot be strictly translated as 'because' in the
following examples. In (1189b), a more adequate translation of hau is with
'even though'. The actual function of hau in this example is one of clause
chaining, i.e. to relate the sentence to the previous one (1189a) by repeating the
last clause. The same conditions apply to (1189d), where hau is the used in a
clause chaining construction based on (1189c). Again, in this context, a
counterfactual translation as 'even though' is more adequate.
a) Sentence 1:
d$asu=te katoami kanaanaj hanoa-i=ta,
how.come=FOC like.this child give.birth-2ps=FRS
b) Sentence 2:
hi kunuhe-uru-a häu, ßäe atii be-na her-ene
there insist-PL-3ps/D because already nevertheless tell-INF want-NEG:3ps/E
'Even though ["because"] they insisted, she did not want to tell.'
c) Sentence 1:
ßäe kana bihi+kuturi ke nisisiri-ahe
already lpl/in hand+head VLI clean-CNT:3ps/E
d) Sentence 2:
kwena-a hau hetau=te ku atii abaata-he
laugh-3ps/D because HRS=FOC there nevertheless resist-CNT:3ps/E
'Even though ["because"] it [the talking tree] laughed there, he still resisted [to laugh as
well].'
speakers, which explains the fact that the speaker of T8 and T10 seems to make
systematic use of the "discourse" function of hana in order to mark a change of
situation. In contrast, this is less the case for the speaker of T53. A further
complication is that the distinction between mi hau 'therefore' and nii hana
'then' is even less clear, as a systematic switch in reference cannot be observed
with these.
The sentence in (1191) exemplifies that the negative connotation does not apply
in all examples. In this case, two girls who had been abducted by cannibals,
suddenly see their uncle who has come to save them. The first use of he is in
conversation of the girls amongst each other; the second occurrence is towards
the uncle. In both situations, the context strictly excludes any connotation of
annoyance or superiority. Thus, the function of he in this example is purely as
an introducer of a quotation.
a)
jiae tg,u hjä=ra hitarii kaipa-kaanu=ra, kurura, na-ure
already CRTN just=ERDall return-lpl/ex=EMF Milord say-3pl/E
" O h Milord, we really have returned all (pieces)", they said.'
b)
he, ma mtohuara ma aj-i-ta na-a hetau
hey ERD no EMF AUX-NEG:3ps/A=FRS say-3ps/A HRS
"'No! absolutely not!" he said.' (as response to accusation of having stolen something)
The respectful function of üra is less evident in (1193), where Lomai comments
on the consequences o f her visitor's disobedient behaviour.
lauhua-ϊ, he i=t$uara-ri-a-ü=m=ta
be.sitting-PRT hey 2sg=see-IRR-NEG-lsg/A=ASS=FRS
'Therefore, (Lomai said), "Well, hm, that's what he wanted, my visitor", when she said
to Lomai's visitors, "Go over there", when she said it, although she said "I want to
bath", he sat there, saying "I won't watch you.'"
Different from the occurrence o f =ra as a final emphatic marker (cf. §12.3.7),
the position o f the ERD marker is virtually unrestricted, as it is found in any
position o f the sentence. This can be observed in (1193), where üra occurs
clause-initially, clause-finally, or within a clause. Multiple occurrences o f üra
are also observed in (1194), which contains five instances of the ERD marker,
some even in a sequence.
a) ßäe:
ku ne-uru-a hau, ßäe tabiit$a näe huajtei ßäe
there be-PL-3ps/D because already finally already again already
b) ku:
fa lenone-Ί, ku ne-uru-a, ht karahai ht ne-ure
there eat-PRT there be-PL-3ps/A there long-time there be-3pl/E
'They ate there and staid there; they staid there for a long time.'
c) kwajtev.
nii baja kwajtel bataneheti na-akaanu hau aj
that after again PLN say-lpl/ex because AUX:3ps/E
Another gap filler commonly used is the word kaami (or variant kardi) which
can be characterised as a multi-class word. As briefly described in §5.16, it can
be used as a full verb to mean 'do like that', 'do this sort of thing', but it is also
used as a noun 'this sort of thing' - and as a gap filler, as exemplified in (1196).
In (1196a), kardi may be analysed as a noun to bridge the temporary memory
loss of the word for the beverage described here. This is evident from the fact
that it fills an argument slot as a copula complement for the first occurrence of
rda. In (1196b), kardi cannot be characterised as functioning as an argument, nor
is it a verb. In this example, it simply functions as a gap filler similar to the
other words described in (1195).
a) Head of NP:
ku ni-a kami, rd-a fioanara+kata kahe ne-naa aaune+baka
there be-3ps/A sort.of be-3ps/A banana+ripe from be-NOM plantain+soup
'There was this sort of thing, plantain soup [made] from ripe bananas ...'
b) Noun modifier:
amuemue-ka hau hetau=te ku hetau kardi banaao ke
wander-3ps/D because HRS=FOC there HRS sort.of leaf.shelter INST
asara-hei hetau
cover-PRT HRS
'As he wandered around, [there was food for him], covered with (kanii) - leaves as a
shelter.'
used twice more in other sentences before this scene. Thus, the use of niki can
be described as having a long-distance effect across a wider discourse.
b) Without noun:
ekuu enua ke sini-ι hano-a kuruataha-j katQa=ne
top tree VLI sleep-PRT spend.night-3ps/D be.two-NOMSbj man=CND
'When two men spent the night sleeping on a tree'
While narratives form the majority of the texts contained in the database, a few
observations can be made on other types of texts. One regards instructions, for
which a sample text is also given in the text selection in Appendix A. Different
from English, where instructions are typically impersonal, this is not the case in
Urarina, which does not favour "abstract" description in general. Instead, a first
person plural form is used, which may in some cases include the listener, with
some variation. Different examples - all from Text 86B in Appendix A - are
given in (1200), where the speaker uses different lpl forms in the course of the
text. Using the lpl/ex form in sentences 1 through 5, she switches to the dual
form in sentence 6 and sticks to this form through the end of the instruction. In
fact, at no stage are passive or impersonal forms used in this text.
hveeta-kaanu
clear-lpl/ex
'First, arriving already, arriving at the field, we clear the underground.'
It should be mentioned that in Text 86A (not listed here), which precedes Text
86B, the lpl/ex form is used from sentence 1 through 27 and switches to the
dual form in sentence 28, from it is used through the end (sentence 38), with
one exception occurring in the exclusive form in sentence 35. In an instruction
about how to fish, by another speaker, the dual form is used throughout. Thus,
both forms are possible options in instructions and one can only speculate about
the different preferences. One possibility is that, strictly speaking, the listener
should not be involved by using the dual form, as he or she does not participate
in the described activity. From this point of view, the lpl exclusive form seems
more appropriate. However, the use of the dual form may be understood as a
friendly gesture as to include the listener in the described activity, rather than
excluding him from an action that he or she could potentially participate in.
This view would be consistent with my experience with the Urarina on the
social level, as outsiders may be invited to participate in some activities once a
relationship of trust is reached.
As a (marginal) feature in conversation, it may be noted that people do not
typically greet each other. As mentioned in §11.3, the greeting formulae
hartoara and soara for 'good morning' and 'good afternoon' are likely to be of
recent origin and could be roughly translated as 'it is light' and 'it is dark',
respectively. More commonly, if occurring at all, people would briefly ask on
an encounter with another person ßae=na, which is the word for 'already'
followed by the interrogative enclitic, to mean 'How's it?'. The reply can occur
simply by saying eehe 'yes'. In more elaborate interactions, people would greet
a relative by calling his kinship term, such as aua 'sister', possibly adding a
question as to enquire to her task (e.g. 'Are you going to the field?'). When
receiving the answer, one may optionally express a sign of good will by adding
something such as 'Beware of (the) snakes!' However, these utterances cannot
be characterised as standardised forms.
More common is an expression used after a conversation with a visit to
somebody's house. In this case, the sentence ßäe kauanu Ί am already going
home' could be described as a common greeting formula, to which the
addressee replies eehe 'yes'. Slightly less common is the related formula
ßäe amuanu Ί am already going (away)', which may be used when a person
leaves his or her own house.
While each tributary (and probably each village) reflects minor dialectal
differences on its own, a division can be made into four major dialect areas:
- Zone A: the Western dialects, including Tigrillo and Espejo dialects
- Zone B: the Lower Chambira dialects, including Asna and Airico rivers and
possibly Pangayacu river and the villages below its mouth (note that no
information is available about the Patoyacu dialect)
- Zone C: the Upper Chambira with all its tributaries, thus forming the largest
dialect area
- Zone D: the Corrientes River, with a large number of villages and settlements
(at least 20). However, these include mixed communities with a majority of
Spanish-speaking people.
No data is available on the Urituyacu dialect, except for what is reported by
speakers of other dialects. According to several accounts, those people who still
know Urarina in that area are reluctant to use it.
The division into these dialect areas is based on a number of features that
were compared during a dialect survey in the Chambira area and its tributaries
(zone C). The findings on zone A dialects are based on the author's fieldwork in
the Espejo river and work with visitors from the Tigrillo river. Zone Β and D
were not investigated within the areas themselves, but with invited speakers
from these places.
Another important aspect to be considered is that there are few speakers with
a "pure" dialect of a certain area, as the Urarina traditionally are a semi-
nomadic people and used to change places frequently. Over the past decades,
regional politics has enhanced the installation of fixed settlements, which
includes assigning land titles to native communities, thereby reducing the
tendency of short-term movements. However, as discussed in §13, marriage is
uxorilocal, i.e. the man moves to the wife's location, which may or may not be
within the same community. If no bride is available in the own community, men
move to other places for marriage, which makes dialect mixing a common
feature. Also note that due to cultural taboos, the author has very few recordings
from female speakers, who would be more likely to stay at their place of birth.
The majority of texts were obtained from male speakers, some of whom,
naturally, live in a community other than their parents' community. Fortunately
for this study, most speakers who were recorded stayed in their dialect zone
even when moving to another village.
The differences between the dialects under investigation are mainly of a
phonological and lexical nature. All dialects are mutually intelligible and no
major grammatical differences on the morphological and syntactic level were
observed. In the following, a range of distinctive features is discussed to justify
the division into four zones as suggested above. The discussions starts with a
detailed investigation of the feature of aspiration in §23.1.1, which permits to
assign specific dialects to dialect zones.
before /t/, /k/, /kw/, /tp/, and /s/, but not before /!/ (cf. (1202). As an exception 1 ΑΛ
from this, the speaker from Tagual (Tigrillo) also lacks aspiration before /tp/.
Below is a short speaker profile for the speakers of the zone A dialects (cf.
(1203)). All speakers lived in Nueva Union de Espejo at the time of recording;
HN grew up there, while VA and MA were among the founders of the
settlement in the Espejo swamp ca. in 1986. JO and CI grew up in different
parts of the Tigrillo river and according to other Espejo dialect speakers have
preserved most of their dialectal peculiarities from that area. It should also be
noted that the entire group of founders of the Espejo community came from the
Tigrillo River. Yet, these have developed peculiarities that can be easily
identified by speakers of other dialects.
102
It is unclear whether this is speaker-specific or a general property of the Tagual
dialect. However, aspiration before /tg/ is generally less intense as compared to other
phonological environments. The notation as "weak" used in the table indicates that
aspiration might not occur in all examples and that it also is less intense as compared
with other speakers. The notation "?" indicates that no examples for the specific
context were available.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
870 Variation
The sample from zone Β dialects involves one speaker from the Asna River (cf.
(1204)). However, it should be mentioned that this also is a rather young
community, probably less than 10 years old. The speaker (MR) is ca. 22 years
old and has been living in the Asna for 5 years. He grew up in Sta. Teresa
(Patoyacu), where both his parents come from. Thus, the information on which
the characterisation of the Asna dialect are based might not be solid enough and
be subject to other factors. The speaker from the Airico dialect (Sta. Rosa de
Airico), however, has always lived in that area and both his parents are speakers
of the Airico dialect. The other Airico speaker (MM), is WM's brother but has
lived in the Espejo for ca. 12 years. According to other Espejo speakers, he has
preserved part of his dialectal peculiarities and can still be easily identified as an
Airico speaker. With regard to postvocalic aspiration, all three speakers have in
common that they exhibit aspiration before any of the consonants in question.
The largest group of language samples are from the Upper Chambira area (zone
C). The table in (1205) provides an overview of the different speakers. Note that
the first speaker (PA) originally is from the Urituyacu River but has been living
in Nva. Esperanza for 35 years - her parents were among the founding members
of the community. It is unclear whether her dialect is typical for the Chambira
area or whether she has preserved traits of the Urituyacu dialect. MC and MV
have not lived on the Chambira for long, but the Pucayacu River, from which
they moved, is part of the Upper Chambira area as well. All other speakers grew
up in zone C or moved to their current living place from nearby villages.
Different from zone A dialects, zone C speakers exhibit aspiration before the
consonant /!/ (cf. (1206)). In contrast, aspiration does not occur before /s/,
except for a few isolated examples in Pionero. As an exception, the Pionero
speaker also has no aspiration before ΙΧς,Ι. However, note that aspiration in this
environment is also especially weak in a number of other dialects of zone C.
There are two text samples from the Corrientes River. Both speakers come from
villages in the central area of this region and exhibit a higher influence of
Spanish than other speakers. Both speakers have a similar history, as their
ancestors moved to the Corrientes River from the Chambira/Tigrillo region in
their youth. Speaker CF moved back to the Chambira 5 years ago.
With respect to aspiration, the Corrientes dialect differs from the others as
aspiration does not occur before /I/ and /s/ (or at least to a much lesser degree -
a few examples contain aspiration before /s/ with speaker HA).
For the texts collected from the Pangayacu dialect, the findings are
inconclusive. Even though the area is part of the Upper Chambira region, it is
the southernmost settlement of this area. A problematic aspect also is that the
speaker profile is not homogeneous: speaker AN, aged 35, has been living in
Sta. Beatriz (Pangayacu) for about 10 years; her parents are from the Pucayacu
river. For speaker JB, it is unknown for how long he lived on the Pangayacu
River. As a tendency, their aspiration pattern resembles that of zone A.
Based on a comparison of other features, it can be stated that the data from
Pangayacu dialect does not match any of the four given groups. A detailed
summary is given in (1215) further below.
103
No statements can be made as to the role of different consonants through which a
vowel can be copied, as not sufficient data is available for all dialects.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
874 Variation
the Nva. Esperanza, Pionero, Sta. Silvia, Pucuna and the Corrientes dialect of
Nvo. Porvenir and to a lesser degree in other Northern dialects of zone C.
23.1.4 Diphthongisation
b) Examples:
/e/ -> [aa] /tihje-ara/ 'squirrel monkey'-PL -> [ti.hjaa.a.ra]
/e/ [ae] /leotpa/ 'other' [lae.o.tQa]
/i/ [ae] /ahinia/ 'before' [a.hae.ni.a]
Ν [ej] /aji/ 'no' -> [a.jej]
/u/ [au] /su-!/ 'kill'-PRT [sau.l]
/a/ [aa] /kutari/ 'head' [ku.taa.ri]
104
This phenomenon is most common in hunting stories and other self-experienced
narratives as to express intensity, velocity, or danger in an exceptional manner.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Dialectal differences 875
b) Examples:
/aj/ [i] /hitQuhwa-j/ 'be black'-NOMsbj [hi.tQu.hwi]
/ a u / -» [u] /iteau-akaanu/ 'live'-lpl/ex [i.tQo.a.kaa.n«]
/a«/ [aa] /laaeko-a/ 'sit'-3ps/A [laa.e.ko.a]
/äa/ [äa] /lenoni-tpä«/ 'eat'-lsg/A [le.no.ni.tcäa]
/ a . u / - > [aa] /laauhiri/ 'small' [laa.hi.ri] (Pangayacu)
/ a . ! / -> [äa] /nai/ 'over there' [näa] (Pangayacu)
/e.l/ [ee] /kale-he!/ 'wash'-PRT [ktt.le.hee]
/e.ö/ [ee] /su-ene-ä/ 'kill'-NEG-lsg/E [so.e.nee]
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
876 Variation
Variations that involve changes between Irl, /d/, and It! are difficult to describe,
as it is unclear which consonant is the underlying one (cf. §2.1.3 on differences
between the Espejo and Chambira dialects). However, there is one tendency that
can be observed as a dialectal difference. While dialects of zone A and D (i.e.
the outermost areas) exhibit variations that involve Irl and Id/ only, the other
two dialect zones are characteristic for variations that involve Idl and /t/.
Specifically, Irl and Id! are hardly distinguished in the Western dialects; on the
Corrientes River many words can be pronounced with either [r] or [d].
Especially before III, the vowel [d] is preferred. The situation is different in
dialects of zones Β and C: here, Ir and Idl are not interchangeable, i.e. the
distinction between the two consonants is retained. However, Idl is usually
replaced by [t] in these dialects: for instance, occurrences of Idl in the Nva.
Esperanza dialect are attested in two words only (darue 'pot' and lidiane 'type
of leaf), as all other words that contain Idl in other dialects are pronounced with
[t]. The Pangayacu dialect (T82) stands out, as there is not only variation
between Idl and It/, but also between Irl and /t/, such as in /raatiri-1/ 'leave'-
PRT pronounced as [taatiru].
a) Distribution:
Zone Type
A none
Β Asna: [ss]
Airico: [tt], [dd-2], [hh]
C 28 de Julio: [tt], [tte], [bb], [dd-1]
Pionero: [tt], [ff], [iquj], [ww], [ss], [tt<?]
Sta. Cruz: [tt]
Sta. Silvia: [tt]
Copal: [tt], [dd-2], [ss], [ff]
Pucuna: [tt], [kk], [bb], [nn], [ss], [ww]
D Las Palmeras: [tt]
b) Examples:
[tt] /satii/ 'all' [sattfl]
[tte] /kat<;a/ 'man' -» [kattea]
[ss] /tasinoha-a/ 'be big-3ps/A' [tassijiohwaa]
[dd-1 ] /ku-darue/ ASC-'pot' [kwaddaruhwel
105
The variation between /d/ and /t/ is not observed in the Copal data.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
878 Variation
There is some degree of variation for the pronunciation of the fricative in the
word 'a little', which is a verb usually occurring in the participle form or with a
nominalising suffix (cf. §5.4.1). The most widespread variant is with [tp], as in
[äatpihn], which is common in zone A (Tigrillo). However, some speakers of
the Espejo dialect pronounce the word with [(], as in [äa/ihii], while other
follow the variant with [t$]. This pronunciation is also observed in the
Corrientes dialect (zone D). In zone C, however, only the pronunciation with [s]
is attested, such as in 28 de Julio, where the word is pronounced [äasihii] (and
[äasihjei] in the Pucuna dialect). In Sta. Cruz (Upper Chambira), the word is
realised as [aasajjiehei]. For zone B, no occurrences of the word are attested
(which is coincidental). However, note that in the Airico dialect, [/] regularly
occurs as a variant of /s/ after /i/, which might indicate that [/] is also the variant
in the word for 'a little' (cf. §2.1.8).
1) Aspiration
2) Vowel copying
3) Very long vowels
4) Diphthongisation
5) Monophthongisation and vowel elision
6) Diphthong modification
7) Variations between Irl, /d/, and It/
8) Consonant gemination
9) Plural -kuru vs. -tQuru
10) Pronunciation of'a little'
The table in (1214) summarises the relation of each feature with respect to the
four given dialect areas. It is evident that there is some degree of overlap
between features of different dialect zones. On the one hand, it is possible to
find similarities between most dialects of a specific group, which justifies the
division into four zones as proposed here. However, this does not imply that the
four dialect zones can be neatly distinguished with regard to all the distinctive
features. For instance, the fact that long vowels do not occur in zones A and Β
does not imply that the two groups share many further features. In fact, the
differences between the dialect zones are so extensive that it would be difficult
to join any of these as being more related than others.
The data recorded in the Pangayacu dialect does not well fit into the scheme
given above. It can be stated with certainty that it does not belong to the Upper
Chambira dialect zone (C), as it does not share any of the features occurring in
this area. As the table in (1215) clarifies, three of the features resemble the
findings from zone A dialects, four match zone B, and four correspond to zone
D. With respect to vowel copying, the Pangayacu dialect is different from all
other varieties. Geographically, this dialect is located quite centrally, which
makes the mix of different features very plausible. However, as the speakers on
which these findings are based may exhibit influence from other dialect areas
(Patoyacu, Pucayacu) due to family history, these conclusions are preliminary.
In addition to the differences pointed out in the previous section, each dialect
has some features that are unique to this particular variety. As the amount of
data is quite extensive, I will only sketch some of the most interesting
peculiarities here, using keywords for a brief overview. Note that all features
described below are optional.
It should be noted that Espejo speakers occasionally pointed out some further
peculiarities of the Tigrillo dialects (which do not occur in the texts from Puerto
Rico and Tagual). These include the replacement of /e/ or /i/ by [«] in some
words, mostly word-initially as in /edaa/ outside' -> [ttdaa]; /isi/ 'fire' ->
[usi], but also word-internally as in /nese/ 'village' [n«se]. These
pronunciations are also adopted by most Espejo speakers, as there is frequent
contact with Tigrillo communities.
Pangayacu (T81):
- Frequent elision of initial /a/: /aka«/ 'water' [kau]; /ahaena/ 'jungle'
[haena]
(T82):
- /i/ -> [e] in /itene/ 'beach' -> [etene]
- Occasional vowel copy across word boundary: /banaao + ha-~iI 'shed' +
'make'-PRT ('making a shed') [banaaohwaal]
According to memories of the speaker JN, whose parents were from the
Urituyacu River, this dialect exhibits a range of words that have an initial /e/
where it is absent in other dialects. Examples for this are erua 'find' (otherwise
rua) and ektt 'there' (cf. ku).
There certainly are many more, though minor, distinctive features between
the various dialects. The data presented here are based on a short survey which
tried to cover as many different dialects as possible, on the expense of a more
detailed analysis. More in-depth studies will be required in order to document
the existing differences more accurately.
The relation between [hw] and [fw] was discussed in §2.1.11. This is one
example for the loss of distinctive features in phonology. While the two sounds
were separate phonemes in the traditional language, [fw] and [hw] now function
as allophones in the innovative language. A similar situation applies to [r] and
[d], as the former phonemic status of [d] may be on the verge of being
neutralised in the innovative language, with only few distinctive examples
remaining (cf. §2.1.3). A possible factor for the loss of this distinction could lie
in the variation between [r], [d], and [t] in the various dialects, which may have
lead to different ways of pronunciation in some words. In addition, the
influence of Spanish may have contributed to an increased degree of confusion
between these consonants. For instance, the Spanish word lampadin 'oil light' is
realised as rafwari (cf. (1229)).
As a trend opposite to the loss of segments, loans are likely to support an
expansion of the phoneme inventory. While no new phonemes seem to have
been added in the past, the use of words borrowed from Spanish has a certain
impact. The details of this development are discussed in §23.3. Further
variations related to phonology are observed on the morpho-phonological level
- these are included in the following section.
A similar tendency can be observed for the use of the pronouns with the
postposition raj, such as in ka=raj vs. kanu raj 'for me', 'to me'. In this context,
the variant with the proclitic is much more stable and thus more commonly used
by younger people, possibly because these forms tend to be lexicalised, as they
are rather frequent (for instance, karaj is also used as a politeness strategy; cf.
§13.5.1). Also recall that with kinship terms, body parts, and other formerly
inalienably possessed nouns, the degree of retaining the proclitic form is much
higher than with other possessives (cf. §7.4). Though less imminent, the gradual
loss of the feature non-alienability is a further example of syntheticisation in the
morphology. During the discussion of formerly inalienably possessed nouns it
was also indicated that words in the innovative language become longer through
the insertion of additional material - which might be a trigger for subsequent
splitting of words into free pronouns and nouns (cf. §7.1.5).
Other features related to possession involve the associative modifier b-.
However, for this morpheme it is unclear whether its presence is typical for the
traditional variety, as speakers make contradicting statements about this. On the
one hand, there is no sign that the grammatical function of b- is lost in the
contemporary language; on the other, its presence vs. absence in some lexical
items is inconclusive, as is discussed in §7.3.2.
A further example for the loss of morphological features is the use of the
attitudinal markers =ra and =ta, as pointed out in §12.3.7, While these regularly
occur in the traditional language, they are not part of the contemporary language
any more, apart from a few dialects that have retained them (=ra in the Airico
dialect and =ta in the Corrientes dialect, see §23.1.12). Another enclitic that is
not used any more as a single marker of the innovative language is the
reassurance enclitic =tau - which now mainly occurs in combination with the
evidential markers =m and =he (cf. §12.3.3; §12.3.4).
A different kind of change is observed with the jussive form, where the
suffix -mii is lost in a manner of speaking, but replaced by another suffix with
the same function: in the innovative language, the jussive is expressed by the
suffix -ijie. The reasons for this are entirely unclear and even the comparison of
dialects is inconclusive since both forms are rather rare in occurrence and hardly
attested at all in the dialect database.
Another example of variation that does not involve a loss of morphological
features is the use of the interrogative enclitic =na in place of the focus marker
=te after the interrogative pronoun d^anu 'why' (cf. §21.1.4). However, while
younger speakers prefer =na as a tendency, there is a high degree of variation
for both forms. Also investigated in §21.1.10 is the formation of the
interrogatives ßaaohwa and ßata(ha) from the respective verbs. These new
forms can be used in the same way as the quantifying interrogative pronoun
cucmto(s) in Spanish and their formation may be interpreted as a result of
Spanish influence. In a similar way, the impact of Spanish on Urarina could be
made responsible for the introduction of a new question type, in which a
negative question may occur without the introducer ta, but with negative
inflection on the verb (illustrated in example (1166) in §21.3)
The reasons for the less frequent use of the politeness marker =t$e by
younger speakers, as reported in §13.2, can be characterised as a cultural
phenomenon, i.e. the absence of this morpheme in conversations with some
family members may reflect the fact that different cultural values are being
adopted. As these also include a degradation of respect and reverence towards
others, its impact on the use of polite forms is conceivable.
There is a range of lexicon entries that are attributed to the traditional language
by younger speakers. More precisely, most of these words appear not to be used
even by older speakers, whereas those terms were apparently used by earlier
generations. Thus, while they are still understood and occur in traditional
narratives, even older speakers do not actively employ these in everyday
speech. A list of examples of such words is given in (1217), each one with the
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
Traditional and innovative language 889
old and the new version. As demonstrated in the list below, lexical pairs of
identical semantic meanings for the traditional and innovative variety are found
throughout almost all word classes. Many words do no exhibit any phonological
similarities to each other (cf. (1217a)), whereas others arguably have undergone
some phonological change but are still based on the same lexical item (cf.
(1217b)).
a) No similarity:
Traditional Innovative Gloss Word class
buunuutaa abaataa 'resist' Verb
erele atanahe 'mosquito' Noun
kuloronoi baaso 'useless', 'worthless' Adjectival noun
hautohwerti rauihirü 'really', 'in truth' Adverb
mtokwara hjauipera; aji 'no' Interjection
heeku arahü 'many' Quantifier
Other words have simply been "forgotten", i.e. they have not been replaced by
other words as the items they relate to are not in use any more, clearly due to
the abandoning of some cultural practices. Younger speakers of Urarina are not
familiar with the meaning of two examples given in (1219), while some older
speakers may still remember these items. In traditional narratives, these words
may still occur.
Also note that most traditional terms contain the associative prefix hi- (cf.
§7.3.3). Apart from this affix, the morphology of the traditional terms is not
always transparent, but their root is usually recognised by native speakers and
thus can be assigned a meaning. For instance, in the term ate hitaabahi 'tapir'
the second word clearly contains the associative prefix followed by elements
that resemble the root / t a b a / for ' b i g ' . The example atemululune in (1221)
lacks the prefix hi-\ in (1222), one example occurs with the associative
modifying prefix b- (for no known reason).
Another group consists of big water-dwelling animals, including fish and
reptiles. These start with the class noun edara 'water people', for which some
background information is required. According to one traditional narrative, the
w o m a n Lomai once came to visit a group of Urarina people and danced with
them. When she had to urinate, they refused to let her go and so she flooded the
earth. As a consequence, all their possessions turned into water-dwelling
animals - for instance, the mosquito nets became paiche fish. The people
themselves became edara - water people. Exactly this is reflected by the
traditional terms displayed in (1222).
Another class noun is found with two jungle-dwelling animals - a land turtle
whose name is associated with its shape ( ' b o w l ' ) and the two largest-sized
monkeys - therefore called 'chief of the j u n g l e dwellers'. Interestingly, 'howler
m o n k e y ' and 'spider m o n k e y ' , for which now separate (and quite distinct)
terms exist, were described by a single traditional term. The class noun itself
contains the current noun for 'jungle' nuna, with a suffix that could possibly be
identified as the agentive marker -era (which, however can only be attached to
verbs otherwise). In the traditional language, the word nunera referred to
' m o n k e y ' as a generic term.
The database contains a few more terms which do not contain any of the three
classifiers discussed above. These are listed in (1224). The traditional term
tahaaelijiaa (literally meaning 'small bird') was a generic term for 'parrot' and
is now represented by different names for each kind of parrot. The word for
'snake' (generic) is morphologically not entirely transparent but means "danger
of the jungle" according to one consultant. The term atajbißaae formerly
referred to 'jaguar', but now is used as a generic term for any animal, which can
include insects. The word for 'white monkey' is not transparent, but evidently
exhibits some phonological similarities between the old and the new form.
Older native speakers declare that Urarina once had traditional terms for all
animals, but the ones listed here are the only ones they remembered. It is
unclear whether these are still used in ayahuasca rituals - a ceremonial occasion
in which apparently much of the traditional language is still used. However, the
data presented above brings up some challenging questions: Did the Urarina
have a "secret" language, or were the animal names used nowadays taboo and
not to be used? Otherwise it would be difficult to explain why the present terms
were introduced at all and where they came from. Further studies on these and
related questions should lead to interesting insights on some spiritual aspects of
Urarina culture which at this stage are not well-known.
In the previous chapters, also a few syntactic features were mentioned, which
differ from each other in the traditional vs. innovative language. One of these is
The results of language contact with Spanish has been previously mentioned in
a number of passages. Here I will summarise what impact Spanish as a
language with a high status has had on Urarina so far and stipulate which
further effects it may have in the future. Apparently, the influence of Quechua
was limited as not many traces from the period of contact are visible. Urarina
has borrowed a number of Quechua terms, including the numerals from six
onward. In a way, these have been integrated into the Urarina lexicon through
some phonological assimilation. However, their status as alien elements of the
language is still recognisable in that they are treated as nouns - different from
native numerals, which are verbs (cf. §5.12). The impact of Spanish - which
may also have had more time to take influence - is more serious. Worst of all,
the Spanish-speaking population has always conveyed the understanding that it
is superior to the speech of the indigenous people, whose languages are simply
described as dialectos, with the connotation that they are not real languages.
Even though the Urarina have managed to keep their language alive over the
past centuries despite the pressure of Spanish, the grammar has conceded to the
influence in certain ways. Instances of change under the influence of the former
colonial language can be observed in many areas of the grammar. Language
contact at the present stage largely occurs through the increased number of
mestizo settlers in Urarina-speaking areas and through the intrusion of traders
and other groups with commercial interests.
The strongest impact of Spanish undoubtedly is on the lexical level, as an
increasing number of items are named according to the local Spanish term.
However, borrowings are not restricted to nouns, as other word classes are open
to new words as well. (1226) gives some examples of loans from different word
classes. Sometimes loans involve more than single lexemes, as entire
expressions or idioms are copied.
The adoption of loans covers a range of semantic areas. Naturally, the majority
of these refer to innovations of some kind. New words were thus adopted to
describe items that did not exist earlier. This typically includes terms to
technical innovations, clothing, household items, or tools and manufactured
materials. However, also words that describe abstract concepts such as 'colour'
or 'size' are adopted (cf. (1227)). Remarkably, the word for 'size' is formed
from the root /taba/ for 'big' - which probably is a coincidence. Other terms
include words for plants not known before contact with Spanish was made, plus
some nature-related terms such as 'field' and 'meadow' - a geophysical
appearance originally unknown to the Urarina. Further loans refer to social and
spiritual aspects of life. For instance, neither the event of 'party' as such is
common to traditional lifestyle, nor the idea of keeping a boy as a helper - as
the former patrones did. A range of further new words are adopted through
contact with Christianity. While the NT translation attempts to use Urarina
terms to describe new concepts, this is not possible in all cases; this is
5) Verbs:
Urarina Spanish Gloss Type
grabaa engravar 'record' Technical
kastaa gastar 'spend' (money) Innovations
kasetekaa castigar 'punish' Social
bautisaa bautisar 'baptise' Christian
It is plausible to assume that the terms listed in (1227) were introduced because
no equivalent Urarina expressions were available. The examples shown in
(1228) differ from this, as these terms were adopted from Spanish even though
106
Note that the local version of Spanish makes use of the phoneme /// in words such as
shinela 'sandal' and casho 'cashew'.
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
896 Variation
The Spanish voiced velar /g/ is usually devoiced to /k/ in Urarina. Furthermore,
syllable final consonants other than nasals are typically elided, such as the /r/ in
ganar 'earn'.
Most younger speakers become increasingly fluent in Spanish and quickly adapt
its phoneme inventory, which is manifested in their realisation of Spanish
borrowings. In fact, the pronunciation of proficient Urarina speakers of Spanish
hardly differs from that of the local Spanish. This implies significant
phonological changes with respect to Urarina phonology, as is illustrated by the
examples in (1230). Some of the most noteworthy factors are the use of coda
consonants and the formation of consonant clusters. In addition, " n e w "
consonants such as /p/ and /g/ are being imported into Urarina phonology.
Also note that to each borrowed noun, a tone pattern is assigned. It appears that
tonal class A (cf. §4.1) is a kind of default class for new words, as the majority
of loans exhibit the tonal features of this class. Another large proportion of
loans behave according to Type D, often copying the intonational pattern of
Spanish words. For instance, the loan posta ('medical post') has penultimate
stress in Spanish, which is interpreted as a Η tone on the penultimate syllable in
Urarina. Before a modifier, the tone shifts to final position, thus behaving
according to tonal Type D (subclass DP-f). However, other Type D loans may
behave differently with many variations and irregularities, such as preserving
a) Pero\
aaüke nijej heriane tabauru u-i, pero riete
though not.at.all maybe some come-NEG:3ps/A but but
b) Sino:
alasjete ke ma natii ere-i=ße hoatia kauatQa-i, sino
seven.o'clock VLI even speak-2ps=CND not good-NEG:3ps/A but
One might expect that the peculiar constituent order of Urarina would also be
subject to pressure from Spanish (a notorious A V O / S V language), but
significant changes to constituent order in Urarina are not observed. As
mentioned in §18.3, there are a few isolated examples of an S or A argument
occurring in preverbal position that cannot be accounted for in terms of the
predicted features (focus, emphasis, negation). Beside that, in one of the dialects
investigated further above (Copal), two examples with an Ο argument in
postverbal position were observed. While such examples are extremely rare,
one could of course attribute these to the influence of Spanish.
O n e innovation in constituent order can be observed with the position of
complement clauses produced by younger speakers. Example (1232) illustrates
a complement clause type not found with speakers of the older generation. In
this case, t w o deviations from other complement clauses occur: a) The
complement clause follows the control verb, rather than preceding it. b) The
control verb is impersonal in that it is marked for 3ps. Thus, the literal
translation of the example could be given as 'Would it be possible that you
repeat it?' - which could be interpreted as a caique from Spanish.
Selection of texts
The following five texts were selected as to exemplify the use of words and
sentences in a wider context. Recordings for each text can be found on the CD
accompanying this book. The texts included here are of different genres and
involve two short third person experience narratives (i.e. non-self experienced
events), one first person (self-experienced) narrative, one traditional narrative,
and one instruction. Note that the numbering of the texts is according to their
number in the database. The speakers of these texts can be characterised as
follows:
Track 01+02 - Texts 8+10 107 : Humberto Nuribe Arahuata (23) has been living
in the Espejo for 18 years. His father is the village elder (Julian Nuribe,
mentioned in §1.6) and his mother is from San Lorenzo (Tigrillo). He is
bilingual and has ambitions to become a storyteller, which is why he
collects stories told by others and has written down some of them. His
narratives were chosen as representative examples for narratives told by the
younger generation.
Track 03 - Text 53: Vicente Arahuata Manizari (42) grew up in San Lorenzo
(Tigrillo) and moved to the Espejo with the team of founders 18 years ago.
His father was from the Pucayacu, his mother from San Lorenzo. Vicente
now is the mayor of Nueva Union and one of my regular consultants. His
text represents a narrative told by a speaker "between" the younger and
older generations. It is particularly interesting with regard to the forms used
to refer to his in-law (cf. § 13.3).
Track 04 - Text 25: Medardo Arahuata Manizari (Vicente's older brother), is
the main storyteller and was mentioned in §1.6. This text is one of the
shorter traditional narratives.
Track 05 - Text 86B: Anita Macusi Nuribe (ca. 32) was born in Santa Rosa de
Airico by parents from that area and has been living in the Espejo for about
12 years, since she got married to one of the local residents. The recording,
which was conducted by Michaela Olawsky in 2004 is a typical example
for an instruction, here on how to make cassava beer. Being one of the few
texts collected from women, it also demonstrates that there are no relevant
differences between the speech of either sexes.
107
The text numbers are based on their occurrence in the Urarina database (cf. §1).
Brought to you by | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft - WIB6417
Authenticated | 194.94.96.194
Download Date | 9/19/13 5:35 PM
902 Appendix A: Texts
ku-akaanu hau
go-lpl/ex because
'Once, with our son-in-law, we went hunting at Cuninico hill with our son-in-
law, because we were going to look for turtles.'
kani
sort.of
'Going all night, already arriving at the harbour of Cuninico hill, arriving there in
the early morning, we slept there somehow, like that.'
ku-akaanu
go-lpl/ex
'We slept and on the next day we built a shed and went hunting, starting from
there.'
ru-hi-akaanu
find-DIM-lpl/ex
'When we each were in pairs, we already found a few turtles.'
ari-a ku-akaanu
seek-NTR go-lpl/ex
'As my son-in-law did not find any, like that, we went to seek again the next
day.'
ru-hi-ana-e
find-DIM-ILT-3ps/E
'As we went to seek again the next day, he finally found one.'
hajti ku ari-akaanu
still there seek-1 ρ 1/ex
'He found one; finding it, we still sought there for three days.'
(24) ßäe hajti ßäe nal atane katäa hajti, itgiiuti-Ί hajti
already still already over.there land centre still be.close-PRT still
kau-a u-akaanu
return-NTR come-lpl/ex
'Therefore, we were very scared; we quickly went home.'
107
Chapo is a drink made from cooked plantains. The word akau, literally meaning
'water' can be used to refer to any kind of drink.
(32) ßäe hatai nunaa asae tihja najßehe-ι ßäe, hatäi ßäe
already very jungle under foot finish-PRT already very already
kauatga najßehel
pretty, much
'Therefore, felling [that tree] thoroughly by all means - with that went pretty
much into the night.'
(42) mi hana kanaka ana safwato ajßa aj-akaanu, hana aka tihja
that when lpl/ex shoe with AUX-lpl/ex instead 3sg foot
nehesißa ne-Ί aj
pure be-PRT AUX:3ps/E
'Then, we did it [i.e. walked] with our shoes, but he instead did it barefoot.'
(53) nitoam-a
be.like.that-3ps/A
'It was like that.'
ne-Ί mki
be-PRT ADVRS
'Earlier, God made [something ] equal to humans. [Lit. 'he made that there
would be [something ] equal to humans that he created']
katia+kwaaun-era
our.creator
'Therefore, God said to them, "Today go planting [peanuts] for me!" (said God).'
hetau
HRS
"'Go to plant them, laughing and joking with each other!" he said.'
kwajtel temu-erate
again plant-CAU2:3ps/E
'Saying, "Go to plant this in your group, he sent them to plant separately again.'
nesarakata-i, ku kami-tQuru-a
start.moving-PRT there sort.of-PL-3ps/A
'Therefore, as he made pass the isana cane's curse [over their heads], they did
that sort of thing, starting to move [like peccaries] so that it would be as it is
now, saying"ooo...".'
(13) nii hau hetau hajti katpa ne-1, hajti kat$a ne-1,
that because HRS still man be-PRT still man be-PRT
risiße+ohwaa ke mriutu-m-u-toe=ra
cAamfe/ra.palm+thorn VLI turn.into-DSTL-IMP-PL=EMF
'Therefore, cursing them there, [the spirit said], "Go and turn into [this sort of]
chambira thorns!'"
ku ne
there be:3ps/E
'They went to get bristles, and already having bristles, they were there.'
ni-a=ne wawaako-rehete
be-3ps/D=CND grunt-HAB 1:3ps/E
'Therefore, as it was like that, when [the peccaries] were there, they used to
grunt.'
kauatQa-ri-ji=ta
good-IRR-NEG: 3 ps/A=FRS
'Therefore, [the envoy of God said], "It is not good if it is this way, if it is in this
manner; it would not be good!'"
hajti mi neneofl-ene
still that be.transformed-NEG:3ps/E
'As they killed it, the human hands and the feet still had not been transformed.'
laana-hee-he=ra
be.missing-DIM-CNT:3ps/E=EMF
'Therefore, [the envoy of God said], "hey, a little bit is still missing.'"
so-o-tge=te Jauara-kaatQe=ra
kill-IMP-PL=FOC see-lpl/in=EMF
'As it is like that, therefore, after that, not long [after that, the envoy again said],
"Come on, let's kill [one] again!'"
tihja-uru
foot-PL
'As he said so, as they killed it already, the human hands and the legs had
already been transformed just in the right way.'
edaatj-e
be.tame-3ps/E
'Killing them there, as they ate them, they were all tame for them.'
kana+hoaaun-era letono
our.creator envoy
'[Then], conjuring there, the envoy of God drove them towards the West.'
suru-naka-helanaala
run-PSB-PRV
'Therefore, they went away, walking slowly, they walked, slowly without
running at all, without being able to run.'
kana+kwaaun-era
our. creator
This is [how] God created the white-lipped peccaries for us.'
(44) ßäe
already
'[The story is finished] already.'
n=asahi kweeta-kaanu
3ps=under clear-lpl/ex
'First, arriving already, arriving at the field, we clear the underground.'
baja ruku-akaanu
after pull.out-lpl/ex
'Throwing the trunks away to the edges of the field, after that, after we have cut
[the trunks] off, we pull them out.'
ruee-kaa
peel-1 pl/du
'Pulling them out, heaping them up, cutting them off - after that we already peel
them.'
netuaka-a=ne kujßa
become.soft-3ps/D=SUB so.that
'After we mashed it completely, pouring [the camote fruit] out, we mash it
completely so that [the mass] become soft.'
List of scientific names for plant and animal terms (in alphabetical order)
Abbott, Miriam
1991 Macushi. In: Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Volume 3,
Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.): 23-160.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
1995 Person-marking and discourse in North-Arawak languages. Studia
Linguistica 49: 152-195.
2003 Imperatives and other commands: a cross-linguistic typology. Ms.,
Research Centre for Linguistic Typology.
2005 Serial verb construction in typological perspective. In: Serial verb
constructions: a cross-linguistic typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
and R.M.W. Dixon (eds.): Oxford: Oxford University Press. In press.
Cajas Rojas, Judith
1989 Nasalizaciön en urarina. In: Temas de linguistica amerinha, R. and
G.S.F. Palomino, Lima: CONCYTEC.
Cajas Rojas, Judith, A. Corbera, B. Gualdieri, and G. Solis
1987 Bibliografia etnolingiiistica urarina. Lima: Instituto de Lingilistica
Aplicada (CILA), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.
Carlin, Eithne
2004 A Grammar Of Trio: A Cariban Language Of Suriname. Duisburger
Arbeiten Zur Sprach- Und Kulturwissenschaft, Bd. 55. Duisburg:
Peter Lang Publishing Company, Volume 1.
Chappell, Hillary and William McGregor (eds.)
1996 The Grammar of Inalienability. A typological perspective on body
part terms and the part-whole relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dean, Bartholomew
1994a The Poetics of Creation: Urarina Cosmogony and Historical
Consciousness. Latin American Indian Literatures Journal. Review of
American Indian Texts & Studies Spring 1994, Vol. 10(1): 22-45.
1994b: Multiple Regimes of Value: Unequal Exchange and the Circulation of
Urarina Palm-Fiber Wealth. Museum Anthropology. Journal of the
Council for Museum Anthropology 18(1): 3-20.
1995 Forbidden fruit: infidelity, affinity and brideservice among the
Urarina of Peruvian Amazonia. The Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute 1(1): 87-110
1999 Language, Culture & Power: Intercultural Bilingual Education among
the Urarina of Peruvian Amazonia. Practicing Anthropology Vol.
20(2) (Special Issue: Reversing Language Shift in Indigenous
America.), L. Watahomigie, T. McCarty & A. Yamamoto (eds.): 39-
43.
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1979 Hixkaryana. Lingua Descriptive Studies 1. Amsterdam: North-
Holland.
1985 Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Summer Institute of Linguistics
Publications in Linguistics, 76. Dallas: Summer Institute of
Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.
Derbyshire, Desmond C., and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.)
1998 Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.
Dixon, R.M.W.
2000 A typology of causatives: form, syntax, and meaning. In: Changing
valency: case studies in transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon, & Alexandra Y.
Aikhenvald: 30-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W.
2002 Word: a typological framework. In: Word. A cross-linguistic typology,
R.M.W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.): 1-41.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2004 Adjective classes in typological perspective. In: Adjectives classes. A
cross-linguistic typology, R.M.W. Dixon and Alexandra Y.
Aikhenvald (eds.): l-49.0xford University Press.
2004 Comparative constructions. Ms., Research Centre for Linguistic
Typology, La Trobe University.
Dryer, M.
2002 Order of subject, object, and verb. Ms., to appear in: World atlas of
language structures. Matthew Dryer, Martin Haspelmath, David Gild
& Bernard Comrie (eds). To be published by Oxford University Press.
Figueroa, Francisco de, Cristobal de Acufia, et al.
1986 Informes de Jesuitas en el Amazonas 1660-1684. Monumenta
Amazönica. Iquitos: IIAP-CETA.
Fleck, David
2004 Matses-English analytical and etymological dictionary. In
preparation.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
2004 Tense and aspect as coding means. In: Journal of West African
Languages, XXX, 2: 53-67. Special issue, edited by Bernard Comrie
and Ekkehard Wolff.
Genetti, Carol
2005 The participial construction of Dolakha Newar: Syntactic implications
of an Asian converb. Studies in Language 29:1: 35-87.
Gildea, Spike
2000 On the genesis of the Verb Phrase in Cariban languages: diversity
through reanalysis. In: Reconstructing grammar: comparative
linguistics and grammaticalization, Spike Gildea (ed.): 65-106.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givön, T.
2001 Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1960 The General Classification of Central and South American
Languages. In: Men and Cultures, A.F.C. Wallace (ed.). Selected
Papers of the 5th International Congress of Anthropological and
Ethnological Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of
meaningful elements. In: Universals of language, Joseph H.
Greenberg (ed.). 2 ed.: 73-113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gualdieri, Beatriz C., and Judith .1. Cajas Rojas
1987 Kaöa eje (lengua urarina). Aspectos de la fonologia. Tesis de
Licenciado en Lingüistica. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San
Marcos.
Gundel, Jeanette, and Thorsten Fretheim
2005 Topic and focus. To appear in: The handbook of pragmatic theory.
Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward (eds). In Press. Blackwell
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite pronouns. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic
Theory) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin and Ekkehard König (eds.)
1995 Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Structure and meaning of
adverbial verb forms - adverbial participles, gerunds. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter
Keenan, Edward L.
1978 The syntax of subject-final languages. In: Syntactic Typology: Studies
in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.): 267-
328. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.
Loukotka, Cestmin
1968 Classification of South American Indian Languages. Reference Series
Vol. 7, Johannes Wilbert (ed.). Los Angeles: University of California.
Manus, Phyllis
1992 Proposiciones de desarrollo y de apoyo y su expresion en las
oraciones del urarina. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios
Etnolingüisticosl'. 15-45.
Matthews, Peter H.
1997 Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University
Press.
Ministerio de Educaciön, Educaciön Bilingüe de la Selva, con la colaboraciön del
Instituto Lingüistico de Verano
1981 Icha. majas (y otros cuentos de animales). Coleccion literaria
Oranna. Libro No. 1. Yarinacocha, Pucallpa: Centro Amazönico de
Lenguas Autöctonas Peruanas "Hugo Pesce".
Montag, Susan
1981 Diccionario Cashinahua. Serie linguistica Peruana No. 9. Mary Ruth
Wise (ed.) Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educaciön, Instituto
Lingüistico de Verano.
Olawsky, Knut J.
2002 örarina texts. Languages of the World/Text Collections. Munich
2002: LINCOM.
2003 Urarina word classes. In: Proceedings from the fifth Workshop on
American Indigenous Languages, Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics,
vol. 13, Jeanie Castillo (ed.). Santa Barbara: University of California:
38-52.
2005 Urarina - Evidence for OVS Constituent Order. In: Leiden Papers in
Linguistics 1.2, Boban Arsenijevic, Noureddine Elouazizi, Martin
Salzmann & Mark de Vos (eds.): 97-123.
Olawsky, Knut J., and Medardo Arahuata Manizari
2004 Orarinaauru Nereretaao (1). Cuentos Urarinas (1). Iquitos: Su
Camino Internacional, Red Educativa de la Etnia Urarina.
Payne, Doris L.
1990 The pragmatics of word order: Typological dimensions of verb initial
languages. Empirical approaches to language typology 7. Berlin,
New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky
1993 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar.
RuCCS-TR-2. ROA-537.
Shell, Olive Α., and Mary Ruth Wise
1971 Grupos idiomäticos del Peril. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de
San Marcos, Instituto Lingüistico de Verano.
Tessmann, Günter
1930 Die Indianer Nordost-Perus. Hamburg: Friederichsen, de Gruyter and
Co.
Tomlin, R.
1986 Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
Velasco, Juan de
1960 Historia del reino de Quito en la America Meridional. Segunda
Parte: La colonia y la republica, 1842-44. 2 vols. Puebla: Editorial
Jungle.
Whitehead, Carl R.
1987 The category 'relevance' in Menya verbal morphology. Language and
Linguistics in Melanesia 16(1-2): 41-53.