Units and Dimensions
Units and Dimensions
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The laws of physics are, in fact, the relationships between measured physical
quantities (and the laws of physics remain same for all observers in inertial reference
frames, sec. 4.1.3). The importance of measurement may be stated from often quoted
view of Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express
it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in num-
bers, your knowledge is a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of
knowledge, but you have scarcely in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of Science,
whatever the matter may be.”
Although scientists may not always remain confined only with strictly measurable
concepts, none would deny the great importance of measurement to science. Often in
the history of science small but significant discrepancies between the existing theory
and accurate measurement have led to the development of new and more general
theories. Thus the measurement of velocity of light in various media facilitated to
establish the wave theory of light. The special theory of relativity actually appeared
from an attempt to measure the absolute velocity of the earth and the quantum theory
emerged from the measurement of the distribution of energy in the black body spectrum
etc. Such advances in our understanding would have not been possible if scientists
were satisfied with only a qualitative explanation of the natural phenomena.
Examples:
F (force) = 32 newton
l (length) = 5 metre
An ideal standard has two principal characteristics: it is accessible and it is invari-
able. In practice, most quantities cannot be measured by direct comparison to the
primary standard which is usually not very accessible. In practice, accurate master
copies of the primary standard are made and used to calibrate the more accessible
ones, which are usually used for measurements. The ruler, micrometer, or vernier
callipers in daily use are in fact, produced following a complicated chain of comparison
with the standard metre preserved at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures
in Sevres, near Paris. Very large distances, such as astronomical distances or very
small distances, such as those within atoms and molecules—say, the effective radius
of the proton (~1.2 × 10–15 m), are usually measured following an indirect approach,
using more involved procedures.
However, the above method of comparison can only be made between two homo-
geneous quantities. We can compare the height of a building with that of a tree or with
the distance between two places, the duration of a year can be compared with that of
a day etc.; but it is absolutely senseless in trying to find out whether the speed of a train
is greater than the distance between two towns or whether the volume of a book is
greater than its weight.
For a measurement to be single-valued, it is essential that the ratio between two
homogeneous quantities must be independent of the unit used to measure them.
If a1 is the numerical value of the magnitude A of a physical quantity using the unit
α1, then from our procedure,
A
= a1 1.2.1
α1
If the numerical value of the same magnitude A be a2, when it is measured using a
unit α2, then we have,
A
= a2 1.2.2
α2
∴ A = a1α1 = a2α2 1.2.3
a1 α2 1
i.e., = or a ∝ 1.2.4
a2 α1 α
that is, the numerical value of a physical quantity and the unit used to measure it are in
inverse proportion. If the height of a person measured in centimetre be expressed by
the number 175, then the same height measured in metre will be expressed by 1.75.
Eq. 1.2.4 is used in converting the numerical value of a physical quantity measured in
one unit into another.
Units and Dimensions 3
1.3 SI UNITS1
Until recently several systems of units have been used in the field of science and
engineering. The Commission for Symbols, Units and Nomenclature (S.U.N. Com-
mission) recommended [Document U.I.P. 11 (S.U.N. 65—3) 1965] the use of only
1. Joseph Louis Lagrange (1736-1813) took leading part in establishing the metric system of weights and
measures.
4 Classical Mechanics and General Properties of Matter
one system of units known as SI units (Système Intèrnational d’Unitès), for use in all
scientific measurements all over the world. The system is being widely used all over
the world.
SI units are of three kinds: the base (or fundamental), supplementary and derived
units. There are seven base units (for the seven dimensionally independent physical
quantities, table 1.3–1) and three supplementary units (table 1.3–2).
The SI unit of any other quantity is derived from its defining relationship by mul-
tiplication and/or division of the base units without introducing any numerical factors
and is called a derived unit (table 1.10–1). The defining equation for velocity (v) is
length (l) ÷ time (t). Therefore, the derived unit for velocity in SI units is ms–1. Simi-
larly, the derived unit for acceleration [a = (v 2 – v 1) / t] and force (mass × acceleration)
in SI units are ms–2 and kg m s –2 respectively. The unit of force in SI units has a special
name (newton) and symbol (N). In SI units fifteen derived units have special names
and symbols, — such as hertz (Hz), joule (J), newton (N), watt (W), pascal (Pa) etc.
A coherent or absolute system of units is a system based on a certain set of
fundamental units, from which, all derived units are obtained by multiplication or division
without introducing any numerical factors. For example, the erg is the absolute unit of
work in cgs system (sec. 1.5), it is given by 1 erg = 1 dyne × 1 cm. The joule, which
is equal to 107 erg, is not an absolute unit in the cgs system. But in mks system (sec.
1.5), the joule is the absolute unit of work since 1 joule = 1 newton × 1 metre. SI, cgs,
mks, fps etc. are all absolute or coherent systems of units.
Unlike that in cgs system (sec. 1.5) the SI units do not require any practical set of
units, nor any separate electrostatic and electromagnetic units. Only the absolute set of
units is enough for all purposes.
The recommendation of the S.U.N Commission regarding SI units is summarised
below:
Units and Dimensions 5
metre standard and is preserved at the same place as the metre. Masses can be com-
pared on a very sensitive balance with an accuracy of one part in 109.
Perhaps some day we will be able to define the kilogram in terms of a natural unit,
such as the mass of an atom. But before that we must learn to count reliably the large
number of atoms needed to constitute a useful sample 1.
(3) The second (s)
Any phenomenon that repeats itself can be used as a measure of time by counting
the repetitions. An oscillating pendulum, coiled spring, quartz crystal, diurnal or annual
motion of the earth can be used for example.
The unit of time, the second, is now (1954), defined as the fraction
1/31,556,925.9747 of the length of the tropical year for 1900. Previously it used to be
the fraction 1/86,400 of the mean solar day. But the mean solar day was found to be a
slightly variable quantity. The difference between the two at present is about 2 parts in
108. Time measured according to the present definition, which is based on the earth’s
orbital motion, is called ephemeris time (ET). The time measured according to the
earlier definition, which is based on the diurnal rotation of the earth, is called universal
time (UT). Both UT and ET must be determined by astronomical observations. A UT
determination takes several weeks, while an ET determination takes several years. To
realize the time, good quartz crystal clocks have been invented, which are checked by
astronomical observations from time to time. They serve as secondary time standards
and some can maintain an accuracy greater than one part in 108. The times are hourly
broadcast by several national observatories according to regular plans and provide the
highest precision in time measurement available to a scientific worker.
The diurnal and annual rotation of the earth are not as constant as is required for
the high precision time measurements of modern times, which in many cases comes to
1 part in 1010. So scientists provisionally adopted (in 1964) another time standard for
which the accuracy is a few parts in 1012. It is a caesium atomic clock and “the second
is the duration of 9,192, 631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transi-
tion between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of Cs133 ”. In atomic clocks,
the basis of time measurement is the periodic time of the oscillations associated with
the transition of an atom or molecule from one energy state to another. Note that these
are natural and invariable intervals of time. A caesium atomic clock would have to run
for about 6000 years before it might gain or loose a single second. They are now in a
state of rapid development, and we may get atomic clocks other than caesium clock
having higher accuracy. At present, time is by far the most accurately determined
fundamental quantity.
(4) Ampere (A)
Ampere is defined (in 1948) as the strength of that constant current which when
flowing in two parallel infinitely long rectilinear conductors of negligible cross-
sectional area, placed at a distance of one metre from one another in vacuo, produces
between these two conductors a force equal to 2 × 10–7 newton per metre length of the
conductor.
(5) Kelvin (K)
Kelvin is defined (in 1954) as the fraction 1/273.16 of the temperature interval
between absolute zero and the triple point of water.
1. The International Committee for Weights and Measures (ICWM) will redefine the unit of mass
(either based on Planck Constant or Avogadro Constant) in October 2007.
8 Classical Mechanics and General Properties of Matter
1. The solid angle of an area at an outside point (O) is measured (in steradian) by the area
subtended (by projection) on a concentric sphere (i.e., with the centre at O) of unit radius, or by the
ratio of area (A) intercepted on a concentric sphere of radius r to the square of the radius (A/r2). Thus
the solid angle of a closed surface at an inside point is 4π sr. An element of area dA at P subtends a solid
dA cos θ
angle 2 steradian at O, where OP = r and the normal on dA makes an angle θ with the OP line.
r
Units and Dimensions 9
[ LT −1 ]
Hence its dimensional equation is [a] = = LT –2 .
[T ]
Momentum of a body is the product of the mass of the body and its velocity.
Hence the dimensional equation of momentum is obtainable from the relation mv =
mass × velocity. [Momentum] = [M] [LT–1] = [MLT–1].
10 Classical Mechanics and General Properties of Matter
Force F on a body is given by the product of its mass and acceleration. We have
F = ma, whence the dimensional equation [F] = [ma] = [M] [LT–2] = [MLT–2].
Pressure (p) is defined as the force per unit area and its dimensional equation is
force MLT
−2
F
∴ f =k
ml
if µ = mass per unit length of the string m = µl, and
k F
f =
l µ
(iii) The velocity υ of a sound wave in a gas: It depends on the pressure p and
density ρ of the medium.
In this case υ ∝ p x ρ y or υ = kp x ρ y .
The dimensions of velocity, pressure and density are respectively [LT –1] ,
[ML–1 T–2] and [ML–3]. Hence, we obtain the dimensional equation
[LT–1] = [ML–1 T–2]x [ML–3] y = [M x+y ] [L–x–3y] [T –2 x ]
Equating the powers of [L], [M] and [T] on the two sides, we get
x + y = 0, –x –3y = 1, and –2x = –1,
Units and Dimensions 13
1 1
∴ x= and y = –
2 2
1 1
− p
∴ υ = kp 2 ρ 2 =k
ρ
(3) Change of unit: With the help of dimensional relations it is very easy to find
the numerical measure of a quantity when the unit in which it was expressed is changed
into some other unit.
(i) The unit of force in the mks system is called the newton. It is the force
required to produce an acceleration of 1 ms–2 in a mass of 1 kilogram. To express it in
dyne, let us write,
1 newton = 1 kg × 1 ms–2 = x dyne = x gcms–2
kg m
∴ x = g . cm = 1000 × 100 = 10
5
∴x = 6.66 × 10 –8
H g K H mK
× 1000 × GH
F 1 IJ 3
100 K
= 6.66 × 10 –8
= 6.66 × 10–11
As another example, consider energy density and force per unit area. Energy
density is energy per unit volume, and has the dimensions [energy] / [volume] =
ML2T–2/L3 = ML–1T–2. Force per unit area has dimensions [force] / [area] = MLT–2 / L2
= ML–1T–2. Pressure is also force per unit area. So, all these quantities are expressible in
the same units. Of the three, energy density and fluid pressure are scalar quantities. So
we may treat them as mutually convertible. We may therefore look upon pressure as
some kind of energy density. The corresponding energy may be called pressure energy.
This concept of pressure is utilized in some hydrodynamical problems, and we shall
come across it in connexion with Bernoulli’s theorem (sec. 13.6). Note that in the case
of fluid, pressure × change of volume = work, which means the same thing as a
change of energy.
∴F = k ρ 1– n η n ϑ 2– n r 2– n = k ρ ϑ 2 r 2 H ρϑr K
We shall find η / ρϑ r is a dimensionless quantity (sec 12.5). So, if in the above
equation, the right-hand side is the sum of several terms with different values of k and
n for each, the equation will still be dimensionally correct. This tells us that F is some
unknown function of η / ρϑ r. So, we can write
FG η IJ
F = ρ ϑ 2 r2 f
H ρϑr K
F F η IJ = φ FG ρϑr IJ
= fG
or
ρϑ 2 r 2 H ρϑr K H η K
We see that F / ρ ϑ 2 r 2 is also a dimensionless quantity. The quantity (ρϑr/η) is
known in physics as the Reynolds number, and we shall come across it in the chapter
on viscosity (sec.12.5). Because it is a familiar quantity, we have introduced
Units and Dimensions 15
it here. Otherwise, its reciprocal would also have served our purpose. Had we taken
n = –1, we would have come to Reynolds number right away; but you might have
wondered why we took n as minus one. The quantity F / ρ ϑ 2 r 2 is known as the force
co-efficient. It is also dimensionless. Our last equation tells us that the force co-
efficient in the case under consideration is a function of the Reynolds number. The
equation is a relation between two dimensionless quantities.
The ∏-theorem in dimensional analysis states that if m physical quantities are
related together and they are expressible in terms of n fundamental dimensions then the
relation between the m quantities can be expressed as a product of m–n dimensionless
combinations of the quantities. The name ‘pi’ is derived from the capital greek letter ∏
often used to indicate a product of quantities.
In the example taken, the five quantities F, ρ, η, ϑ and r were related. Three
fundamental dimensions, M, L and T, were used to express them. So, according to the
∏–theorem, the relation should be expressible in terms of 5–3 = 2 non-dimensional
combinations of the quantities. And this is exactly, what we have found. In the examples
(i & ii) we have taken in sec. 1.7, m = 4 and n = 3. So each result can be expressed in
terms of only one dimensionless combination. Try them as an exercise. In the first of
the examples there the relation is t g / l = a dimensionless constant.
Number of dimensionless groups sometimes exceed m – n. In that case, the analy-
sis is possible with a number of fundamental dimensions less than n. One should use
minimum number of fundamental dimensions in ∏-theorem.
The ∏-theorem has wide application in problems of motion of a solid through a
liquid or gas, and in the convection of heat.
figures is equal to the square of the ratio between their corresponding linear dimensions
(l)”.
Table 1.10–1
A1′ / A0 FG
l′ / l
= 1 0
IJ 2
or
A2′ / A0 H
l2′ / l0 K 1.11.1
where A 0 and l0 are the chosen units of area and length respectively. From eq. 1.11.1
A1 A2
= 2 = c1 = a constant 1.11.2
l12 l2
A1′ l′
Here A1 = , l1 = 1 etc. denote not the quantities (here area & length) themselves,
A0 l0
but the numbers by means of which these quantities are expressed in the relevant units
used. In the expression of any physical law we must always adhere to such a meaning
of the symbols. Now from eq. 1.11.2
A = c1 l 2 1.11.3
where c1 depends on the shape of the geometrical figure and the units chosen for
measurement of area and length. At this stage, we have every freedom of choosing
both the units and dimensions for the area and length absolutely independently of each
other and in general c1 has dimensions.
Units and Dimensions 17
We may take any arbitrary area of our choice as our unit area and prescribe any
symbol, say [S], for its dimension. In that case c1 has dimensions [SL–2]. However, the
existence of the relationship between the area and length (eq. 1.11.3) makes it possible
to relate the unit of area to the unit of length i.e., to make the unit of area a derivative
of the unit of length. In doing so
(1) the dimensions [L2] is customarily identified with the dimensions of area by choice
and not by necessity. In that case c1 is a dimensionless number (e.g. Reynold’s number,
sec. 12.5).
After asserting that c1 is dimensionless we still have the absolute freedom of choosing
the magnitude of unit area. It may be an area of any plane geometrical figure of any
shape (circle, square, equilateral triangle etc.) having linear size equal to a definite
(conventionally accepted) number of unit of length. It is customary to make the choice
in such a way that c1 becomes equal to 1. This has the added advantage that the
proportionality constant c1 disappears from eq. 1.11.3.
(2) Say, we take the area of a square of unit length as our unit area. Then the dimen-
sionless constant c1 = 1 and for a square of length l units
A=l2 1.11.4
which makes (the unit of) area as the derivative of (the unit of) length. The whole
procedure may be simulated by simply assuming the proportionality constant in the
defining equation or in the law to be dimensionless and equal to unity. In such a
formulation only one dimensional entity [L] is sufficient for both length [L] and area
[L2]. However, in this case, we must sacrifice the freedom of choosing the unit of area
independent of the unit of length.
In fact, this is a general rule for defining derived units. Whenever, we have a
relationship between quantities having apparently different dimensions a universal
constant (see below) appears in the relation and by asserting that the constant is dimen-
sionless and equal to one we introduce a derived unit for some physical quantity and
remove the universal constant from the basic equation.
The proportionality constant in the defining relationship which depends on the
choice of basic units and not on the specific properties (e.g. specific gravity, critical
temperature etc.) of the substances, is called universal constant (e.g. c1, universal
gravitational constant etc.). From above discussion, it is clear that there is a single-
valued relationship between the number of universal constants and the number of
fundamental dimensions (i.e., basic units). A reduction in the number of fundamental
dimensions is always accompanied by a reduction in a number of universal constants.
In general, the greater the number of dimensional entities chosen, the more independent
units can be chosen to suit the order of magnitude convenient for a particular purpose.
However, in that case, we must have greater number of universal constants in the
formulas of physical laws and definitions.
If we choose the proportionality constant c2 in the Coulomb’s law in the form
q1 q2
F = c2 1.11.5
r2
(F is the magnitude of force between charges q1 & q2 at separation r) to be dimension-
less, then the charge q automatically acquires the dimensions L3/2 M1/2 T–1 and no addi-
tional basic unit beyond those of mass (M), length (L) and time (T) of classical me-
18 Classical Mechanics and General Properties of Matter
by equating the electric and magnetic constants to unity in a system constructed ac-
cording to SI system or equating the velocity of light (c) (in vaccum) to unity—in a
C.G.S. system. Then, we have only two basic units i.e., those of light intensity and
length (or time). The unit of luminous intensity (cd) not being directly related to com-
mon physical quantities we virtually have only one basic unit—that of length (or time).
In this system, Planck’s constant (h) and electronic charge (e) have the dimensions
[h] = L2 and [e] = L 1.11.10
The unit of length may now be so selected that Planck’s constant will be equal to unity
and we ultimately have a system which is in general dimensionless; i.e., in such a
system we are completely deprived of the freedom of selecting magnitude of any unit
whatsoever. Systems in which the greatest numbers of universal constants have been
equated to (dimensionless) unity are called natural systems. The above proposal
(h = 1) is due to Planck. There are other proposals also1. In Planck’s system (c7 = k =
c = h = 1) the unit of length is 4.05 × 10–33 cm, of mass 5.46 × 10–5 g and of time
1.35 × 10–43 s! (see Ex. 1.11–1).
In a natural system all the basic units are automatically defined (Ex. 1.11–1) and
the relevant universal constants have magnitude one. In such a natural system all other
universal constants will be dimensionless numbers and all physical quantities are di-
mensionless.
However, we cannot randomly equate the universal constants to unity owing to
the fact that there are definite relationships between some of them. For instance the
electronic charge (e), Planck’s constant (h) and the velocity (c) of light form a dimen-
sionless combination, so-called fine structure constant
e2 1
α= = 1.11.11
hc 137
Clearly we cannot simultaneously equate all of them to unity. In the Planck’s system
1
(c = h = 1) the charge of an electron is 2 π × 137 .
On the other extreme of this natural system, we have the choice of choosing an
arbitrary magnitude for the units of different kind of physical entity such as length,
area, volume, velocity, acceleration etc. In this case, the number of dimensions will be
equal to the number of different types of physical entities and an enormously large
number of universal constants will appear in the equations of physics!
Although in a natural system all the units are quite far from the size of the quanti-
ties in practical work, such a system is usually preferred in theoretical physics owing
to great simplification of fundamental equations.
The change of units or the number of fundamental dimensions does not affect2 the
physical content of any equation if it is correctly interpreted.
1. D. Hartree proposed to equate all the following quantities to unity — charge and mass of elec-
h
tron, the radius of the first Bohr orbit and =h.
2π
l
2. In a system with c = = 1, the length and time have the same dimensions. A time of 1 cm then
t
means the time taken by light to traverse 1 cm distance in vaccum. It may appear peculiar, but it
is absolutely flaw-less from the physical point of view.
20 Classical Mechanics and General Properties of Matter
Ex. 1.11–1 Unit of mass, length and time in the Planck’s natural system
In the natural system proposed by Planck, the universal gravitational constant (c7 ), the velocity
of light (c) and the Planck’s constant (h) are equated to unity. In the Planck’s natural system let the units
of mass, length and time be represented by m0 g, l0 cm and t0 s respectively.
The dimensions of the universal gravitational constant [c7 ] is (sec. 1.6) [M–1 L3 T–2 ]. Therefore,
6.67 × 10–8 g–1 cm3 s–2 = 1 (m0 g)–1 (l0 cm)3 (t0 s)–2
since c7 = 1 in the Planck’s natural system.
l03
∴ G0 = (1)
m0 t02
where G0 = 6.67 × 10–8
Similarly, for velocity of light [c] = [LT–1 ] and
3 × 1010 cm. s–1 = 1 l0 cm (t0 s)–1
l0
∴ c0 = (2)
t0
where c0 = 3 × 1010 .
And the dimensions of [h] is [ML2 T–1 ] (from ε = hν, where ε and ν are energy and frequency
respectively). Therefore,
6.63 × 10–27 g cm2 s–1 = 1 (m0 g) (l0 cm)2 (t0 s)–1
m0l02
∴ h0 = (3)
t0
where h0 = 6.63 × 10–27
From eq. (1), (2) and (3) we get the unit of mass, length and time in the Planck’s natural system:
1 1
h c 2 6.63 ×10−27 × 3 ×1010 2 −5
m0 = 0 0 = = 5.46 × 10 g
G0 6.67 × 10 −8
1 1
G h 2 6.67 ×10 −8 ×6.63 ×10 −27 2 −33
l0 = 03 0 = = 4.05 ×10 cm
c0 (3 ×1010 ) 3
L G h OP = LM 6.67 × 10 × 6.63 × 10 OP
1 1
–8 –27
=M
2 2
0 0
. × 10 – 43 s
= 135
N c Q N ( 3 × 10 ) Q
t0 5 10 5
0
Units and Dimensions 21
QUESTIONS
Q.1.1. Name and define the seven fundamental units of the present International System.
Q.1.2. What is an operational definition? If temperature is defined as ‘the property which deter-
mines the direction of flow of heat when two bodies are brought into contact’, discuss if the
definition can be considered operational.
Q.1.3. Which of the seven international fundamental units are based on operational definition, and
which are arbitrary standards?
Q.1.4. What is a physical quantity? What is meant by its dimensions?
Calculate the dimensions of (i) the universal gravitational constant, (ii) Young’s modulus,
(iii) surface tension, (iv) viscosity. How would you express these quantities in mks units?
Q.1.5. State the principle of homogeneity of dimensions. What is a dimensional equation? What
is dimensional analysis? What can you achieve by dimensional analysis?
Test the principle of dimensional homogeneity in the expression for the distance traversed
in t-th second under uniform acceleration.
Q.1.6. State the ∏-theorem in dimensional analysis, and illustrate it in the case of a simple
pendulum.
A particle having an initial velocity u and a constant acceleration f traverses a distance s in
time t. Show with the help of the ∏-theorem that s/ft2 = φ (u/ft). Also show that the actual
value of s will be of the form s = k 1 ut + k 2 ft2 where k 1 and k 2 are numerical constants.
Q.1.7. What are the limitations of the method of dimensional analysis? In what sense can pressure
be considered as a kind of energy density?
Q.1.8(a) The acceleration due to gravity is 32 ft/s 2 . If the unit of length is a mile and the unit of time
is a minute, what will the above value be in the new units? [Ans. 21.8 mi/min2 ]
(b) If 1 ft = 30.48 cm, 1 lb = 453.6 g, g = 32 ft/s 2 , how much is a horse-power in mks units?
[Ans. 7.4 × 102 W]
(c) Find the number of dynes in a force which, acting on a mass of 15 kg for 1 min produces a
velocity of 4.6 km/s. [Ans. 11.5 × 107 ]
(d) Find the number of newtons in the force which, acting on a mass of 1cwt (hundred weight)
for one minute, gives it a velocity of one mile per hour. (Given that 1 cwt = 112 lb, 1 ft =
30.48 cm, 1 lb = 453.6 g). [Ans. 3.78 × 104 ]
Q.1.9 (a) The density of a liquid is d and its surface tension, S. A drop of the liquid of radius r
oscillates with a period T. Assuming T depends on d, S and r, prove dimensionally that
T ∝ (r 3 d/S)1/2.
(b) Assuming that the mass M of the largest stone that can be moved by a flowing river
depends only upon the velocity ϑ and the density ρ of water and on g, show that M varies
with the sixth power of the velocity of flow.
(c) You are told that the volume V of a liquid flowing out per second through a length l of a
narrow tube of radius r under a pressure P is directly proportional to P and r4 and inversely
proportional to l and η. Check the result dimensionally.
Q.1.10(a) If the units of length, velocity and force are taken as the fundamental units, what will be the
dimensions of mass and time?
(b) If force, velocity and momentum are taken as the fundamental quantities, what will be the
dimensions of mass, length and time?
(c) If the units of length, velocity and force are doubled, show that the units of mass and time
will not change, but the unit of energy will be quadrupled (i.e., increase in the ratio 1 : 4).