1.how To Succeed at University in English
1.how To Succeed at University in English
Second Edition
John M. Andre
© 2014 John M. Andre
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be
reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic,
electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording,
scanning, digitizing, taping, web distribution, information networks, or information
storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976
United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Page 1
:
Table of contents
Part 1: Introduction.............................................................................................................. 6
Chapter 1: How to judge success at university ................................................................ 8
Chapter 2: Why you should care about your grades ....................................................... 9
Part 2: Managing Yourself .................................................................................................. 10
Chapter 3: Improving your English ................................................................................. 11
Chapter 4: Managing your time ..................................................................................... 13
Chapter 5: Behaving professionally................................................................................ 17
Part 3: Understanding the material ................................................................................... 22
Chapter 6: Critical reading.............................................................................................. 23
Chapter 7: Listening and taking notes during lectures .................................................. 29
Chapter 8: Homework .................................................................................................... 33
Chapter 9: Understanding feedback .............................................................................. 35
Chapter 10: BTEC HNC and BTEC HND ........................................................................... 37
Part 4: Showing you understand........................................................................................ 41
Chapter 11: Common assignment types ........................................................................ 42
Chapter 12: Common task verbs .................................................................................... 47
Chapter 13: How to write an abstract............................................................................ 53
Chapter 14: How to write an introduction ..................................................................... 56
Chapter 15: How to show understanding ...................................................................... 60
Chapter 16: How to write a paragraph .......................................................................... 72
Chapter 17: How to give good evidence ........................................................................ 75
Chapter 18: How to reference properly ......................................................................... 81
Chapter 19: How to write a conclusion .......................................................................... 91
Chapter 20: What to put in the appendix ...................................................................... 94
Chapter 21: How to make your writing beautiful .......................................................... 96
Chapter 22: Reflecting on your work ........................................................................... 103
Chapter 23: Editing your writing .................................................................................. 106
Chapter 24: Marking your own work ........................................................................... 109
Chapter 25: How to give a good presentation ............................................................. 112
Part 5: Where to go from here ........................................................................................ 126
Page 3
Chapter 26: Continuing on to graduate school ............................................................ 127
Chapter 27: Letters of recommendation ..................................................................... 129
Chapter 28: Concluding comments .............................................................................. 132
Page 4
Terminology
English is a very rich language with more words than any other language in the world.
Within English, there are different versions of the language. The most common two are
US and UK English. Some people consider “International English” to be an additional
version of English. Those of us who have been exposed to both US and UK English, may
combine the two into this “International English.”
In this writing, there will be some words which you might not be familiar with. Notice
that some of the words could have been chosen differently but please do not get lost in
the details and lose the benefits you could receive from this book. The differences
between “grades” and “marks” is not an important difference. For this reason, I use the
term grade (noun) to refer to how good a student’s performance is judged to be: “I hope
you get high grades.” I use the term mark (verb) to refer to the process of an assessor
going through and determining a student’s grade: “When the assessor marks your paper
they must decide what grade you will receive.” Again, please do not get lost in the
details.
English does not have a gender-neutral singular pronoun for humans. What this means is
in English, we can say “he” (referring to a male) or “she” (referring to a female) but we
have no way to say “it” (avoiding gender) and still refer to a human. Since teachers can
be male or female, I will use “they” which is technically incorrect (though commonly
used in spoken English). “They” can refer to plural (more than one) humans ignoring
gender. I will use “they” to refer to singular and plural so I can avoid the issue of gender.
There is another issue about the student. Presumably you are a university student. If I
refer to “the student” all the time it may feel too remote and not connected to you.
However, if I say “you” constantly it may begin to feel too much of a burden. For this
reason, I will change between “the student” and “you” when referring to you, the
student.
Page 5
Part 1: Introduction
This book was written after years of watching underprepared students enter university
and struggle with things that teachers believe all university students should already
know. University teachers usually have to focus on the content of the module (or
subject) they are teaching. Therefore, the teachers will not normally have the time to
help students learn how to write or learn how to judge if a source is a valid source to use
for academic purposes.
Students need to understand these things, and more, if they wish to succeed at
University. To succeed means to achieve high grades which will allow you to enter a
good graduate school or to get a good job. Anyone, whether an employer or a school,
who cares about your degree will also care about your grades. Therefore, it is important
to spend the time necessary to get good grades. If your only goal is to pass, get your
piece of paper (diploma), and get out, then this book will help you so that you do not
fail. If you realize that your degree will stay with you for the rest of your life and you
should get the best one you can, and you are willing to put in a little extra time to get a
much better grade, then this book is exactly what you need.
Students who are not native English speakers have all the challenges of any university
student plus they have the added challenge of the language issues associated with
studying in a second language. These language issues impact everything from reading to
understanding lectures, giving presentations, and especially writing.
University students are expected to do a lot of two things: Reading and writing.
Reading is generally how the student is expected to learn. Yes, the student will get
information from the teacher’s lectures but there will be significant amounts of reading
involved. Students will need to read texts, reports, cases, and many other sources of
information in order to gain the information they need to produce assignments showing
they understand what the teacher is expecting them to learn. Students should never
think that they can get all of the information they need simply from the teacher’s
lectures. A general guideline is that undergraduate students will need to spend 1.5 hours
outside of class for every hour of class time. So, if you spend four hours in class each
week, then you should expect to spend an additional six hours outside of class each
week. This time is mostly spent reading.
As well as reading, students are expected to write, a lot. Students may be writing 20,000
words (sometimes more) every semester (starting in their first semester). This is like
writing a small book every semester with very little training in how to write a proper
academic paper.
Page 6
The purpose of this text is to help the student better understand how to do the things
they are expected to do but might not understand how to do.
The content has been divided into chapters with each chapter focusing on a single topic
such as how to write a proper introduction for a report or how to behave properly as a
professional student. Each chapter will refer to others but can usually be read by itself if
there is just one topic that you need to understand now. For example, if you are unsure
about how to write an introduction to your report, jump the chapter “How to write an
introduction.”
As a university student, you are (probably) an adult. Being an adult means you get to
choose. Look back at the table of contents and choose an area you would like to better
understand and jump to that chapter. Each chapter is short, usually just a few pages.
Make sure you read all of it, and make sure you read it again every year or so. It is easy
to fall into the trap of thinking that we always remember everything we read.
Unfortunately that is rarely true. As a student, you should expect to re-read the most
important and the most basic information, like the information contained herein, from
time to time.
I welcome any feedback on this text. If it helped you or not, I would love to hear your
thoughts. Please feel free to contact me at: [email protected].
Page 7
Chapter 1: How to judge success at university
Success means different things to different people. For some, success at university
means learning a lot. For others, it means making life-long friends. However, one thing
that is universally understood is that a successful student will achieve high grades while
unsuccessful students will achieve low grades.
While it is clearly better for you to make friends in university, as well as enjoy the
activities and other opportunities available there, this book will focus on the issue of
getting good grades.
If you are getting good grades, then you are likely doing everything right. For example, it
is much easier to get good grades when you have good friends – friends who will
motivate you to study and will be there to discuss new ideas with. You should make
friends. It is important.
You should also have fun. You are (likely) young. You should enjoy your youth. Find the
things which are fun for you and do them. However, do not let this take up all your time
to the point where you do not have enough time for your studies.
Many people will tell you learning is easier when you are young. Learning is a very
complex topic and there are benefits to being older (you have more experiences which
help you understand new ideas). However, this time when you are at university is a time
to focus on learning the information which will shape your professional future. Take
advantage of the structure of your brain at this age. Learn everything you can, as well as
you can, and you will see benefits which will last your entire life.
The teacher asked how he could be so sure that future employers would never want to
see his grades. The student responded, “You see, my father is the head of a large
international company in this country. Once I graduate I know they will hire me and
because of my family’s position, I know I will get promoted quickly. Actually, nobody will
ever ask for my grades, but I must have the degree to get hired.” The teacher knew
exactly what the student meant.
Five years later, the student’s father was sentence to death for economic crimes against
the country. The student lost his position in the company and had to start applying for
jobs like everyone else. However, it was too late. His grades were already set.
The story above serves to illustrate one key point: The future is unknown. Life is about
many things, including managing your risks. Since you do not know what will happen in
the future, you should make sure you keep all your options open. The simple fact is, you
have more options when good grades than with poor grades.
While some cultures care more about grades than others, it will always be better to have
higher grades. So, do your future-self a favor – get the best grades you can now.
This section will discuss three very important issues to students who are studying in
English as a second language:
Improving your English is something you will need to continue to do for your entire
university career and perhaps for your entire life. You will see several techniques that
even native English speakers use that you should also consider using.
Managing your time is necessary because you are given only 24 hours each day. You
must decide what you are going to do with each of those hours and you will see some
ideas to think about here.
Behaving professionally is about the image that you give to the entire world. People will
always judge you by the way they see you and what they see is how you look and how
you act. In this section you will see several key points about behaving in a professional
way.
Some universities offer students intensive English classes. In some schools, this is the
first year of study wherein the students first learn the English language and then they
learn the content of the courses in English. In these schools, some students believe that
once they pass the English year that they are done, they can focus on the subjects, and
they can stop learning English. This is completely wrong.
You may need to continue learning English formally with a school or a language center
or something similar. You may need to study it on your own using websites, written
books, or audio books.
However, just learning vocabulary is not enough. You should listen to the news or music
in English. You should watch movies in English. You should constantly expose yourself to
spoken and written English.
So take the time to constantly improve your English. This can be doing relaxing things
like watching movies or it can be chatting with your friends. However you do it, make
sure that you give yourself every opportunity to improve your English language skills.
We each make thousands of decisions every day. We decide what time to wake up. We
decide how much time to spend in bed between the time we wake up until the time we
get up and start our day. We decide whether we eat breakfast or not. We continue
making decisions until the very end of the day when we decide the time we sleep.
Each of these decisions is important and each decision will lead to a natural result. For
example, if you decide to not take a shower, then you will naturally smell bad and
people will not want to be around you.
You skipped breakfast – now you are hungry. You are thinking about your
stomach and not the lesson. Your body and brain are missing the nutrition from
the food you should have eaten. You will naturally pay less attention, you will
remember less, and you may start to sleep in class.
You did not drink water before class – now you are thirsty. You may not be
thinking you are thirsty but your body is already starting to feel dehydrated. One
of the first signs of dehydration is starting to have problems thinking and
concentrating. You will learn less in class because of this.
You did not review the lesson before class – now you do not know what is
coming. You just wait to hear the teacher lecture and hope you understand
everything they say. However, it might not be clear to you: Did they say
“strategy” or “tragedy?” If you would have spent a few minutes before class
simply reviewing the slides the teacher sent or skimming the chapter in the text
The solution is to properly manage your time. To properly manage your time, usually
you need to find out which times are hard (you cannot change them, like class start
time) and which are soft (you can change them, like when you eat). Class starts at 7:30
am. This is a hard time. So, you start working back from this. You should be in class 15
minutes before class starts so you must arrive at 7:15 am. It normally takes you 30
minutes to get to school so you must leave your house at 6:45. It takes you 45 minutes
to brush teeth, eat breakfast, and quickly review the lesson for the day. So, you should
wake up at 6:00 am. If you want to build in some safety, you can wake up at 5:45.
To many students, 5:45 sounds quite early. They think since they go to bed after
midnight, they feel very tired in when they wake up so early. Of course, that is very
normal. It is a natural result of the decision to go to bed after midnight.
You must consider how much sleep you need per night. Remember that newborn
children sleep for 16 hours per day. Your grandparents might only sleep for five hours
per day. If you are 18-22 you should get nine hours of sleep per night.
If you get less than nine hours of sleep, your brain is not well rested. This means you will
pay attention less, you will learn less, and later you will remember less. Your notes will
not be as good and this will affect the quality of your written assignments or exams.
There are studies which show clearly that the easiest way for a student to improve his
grades is to get enough sleep.
So, you need to wake up at 5:45 and you need 9 hours of sleep. This means you must go
to sleep by 8:45 pm (20:45). If you think it is crazy to go to bed at 8:45 pm, you are not
alone. Many students want to stay up late. However, being an adult means being in
control of yourself and resisting the short-term desires which take you away from your
long-term desires. You have to choose: Do you want to stay up late or do you want good
grades and the good future that comes with them? You could always shift your time a
little and stay up until 9:00 pm, using those extra 15 minutes to review for your class the
next day and then you could wake up at 6:00 am.
We can continue calculating back in time to see what you should do for the rest of the
day now that we know you should sleep by 9:00 pm.
If you are in class four hours in the morning then you are done by lunch time. The next
thing you should do is to eat a good lunch and relax. Always take time to have a relaxing
lunch. You have been studying for four hours; you deserve to rest your brain for an hour.
After lunch it is time to start homework. You have four more hours of work to do (if you
are a professional student you should be studying for eight hours per day). So you spend
So, by 5:00 pm you should be done with your work. Now you have some free time. Enjoy
it. If you want to spend time with your friends, do so. If you want to read more about
some topic, now is the time. If you want to play a game, now is the time. By 6:00 pm or
7:00 pm you should eat dinner.
Then you have a little more time to relax and finally you can get to bed at 8:45 pm and
you will have the natural result of being well rested in the morning and you will receive
all the benefits that come with that.
In the end, you should see that you have plenty of time. Actually, you have 24 hours
each day. Everyone on this planet gets 24 hours per day. Nobody gets more and nobody
gets less. We are all equal in that way. You are an adult. You get to decide what you do
with those 24 hours. You also get the rewards of deciding correctly.
What if your friends want to have lunch with you? Great! Eating is a very social activity.
What if your friends want to do something after lunch? Then you need to choose and
you live with the results of that choice. Hopefully, your friends support you and are also
trying to be serious students in order to have the best future they can have. If they do
not understand, you should explain it to them.
Take time to plan your day and things will be easy. If you let the day decide your choices,
like a leaf blowing in the wind, then you will have to depend on luck and destiny. If you
want to be responsible for your own life, then you must decide. The good news is that
you get to decide. So choose well.
Checklists
Some people are gifted with a very strong memory. They seem to be able to remember
everything. Those people are very lucky and they do have a natural advantage in higher
education. However, for those who struggle to remember everything, there are
solutions.
If you find your memory is limited, then do not try to remember everything. Remember
what is really important and write down the rest (even better is to write down
everything). Do you try to remember everything the teacher said or do you take notes?
Use writing to keep track of what you need to do.
Use a calendar
In addition to using things like checklists, use a calendar so you can see everything that is
going to happen. You should know when your classes are, including any tutorial classes.
You should know when you can see your teachers during their office hours. You should
know when big events are coming up.
The technology of today makes keeping checklists and calendars easy. Students can use
their phone/tablet/laptop and keep their entire calendar online. When you have a new
assignment due date, add it to your calendar, and your checklist. Do not forget: Check
your calendar several times each day so you do not forget anything.
Do not procrastinate
Procrastinating is when you have something to do but you decide to do it later so you
can do something more fun now. This is very common for university students. They have
reading or other homework to do but instead of doing it, they do something else more
fun. When they get to class, they may come up with an excuse or try to beg the
teacher’s forgiveness. However, they failed to do what they needed to do. Nobody likes
people who fail because of procrastination.
The solution is to see this natural tendency in ourselves. When you see yourself thinking,
“Yes, I have those five pages I need to read but I would really rather go get ice cream
and watch kung fu movies.” Then you need to say “Oh, this is me procrastinating. I will
be much better off if I just get the job done. Then I can relax and not worry.”
Time management is one of the skills you need to master in order to be a successful
adult. It is a skill which means you must learn and then practice it, just like you must
practice English to keep those skills. Use checklists, calendars, and avoid procrastination.
It will result greater happiness for you.
Being early is not bad, it is good. It gives you a chance to talk with your classmates about
the previous lesson, the upcoming lesson, and how the lesson actually applies to the real
world. Of course, you can talk about non-school related issues as well but you should
consider this an opportunity to meet face-to-face with your classmates which you might
not often see outside of class.
If you have to travel to get to school, and you never know how thick traffic will be, you
should leave earlier than you think you need to. If you plan to be in class 15 minutes
before class begins, then even if you have a little bad traffic, you should still be on time.
If the traffic is so bad that you are still late, then you will know that next time you should
You should never be talking to someone else while someone is addressing the class. If
someone is talking, you should always pay attention to them. If you are talking to
someone else, you are doing several unprofessional things. First, you are showing that
the speaker is not important to you and that they have nothing important to say.
Second, you are distracting the person you are talking with so that person also cannot
pay attention to the speaker – making it much worse. Third, you are also distracting all
others who can hear or see that you are not paying attention.
Paying attention does not simply mean not talking. You should not be sleeping, listening
to music, watching videos, playing games, or anything other than paying close attention
to what is being said.
You should consider time in class to be “special time” during which you focus on one
thing – learning everything you can about the topic.
Are you expected to write a report? If yes, what is the topic? What questions must you
answer? Should you include an abstract or executive summary? What is the word count
limit? How much flexibility is there in that limit? What can you do to get the highest
grade possible?
Doing your best to achieve the highest grade on the assignment or exam
Part of your responsibility as a student is to understand how you can get the highest
grade possible. What does the teacher expect to see in order to award the highest
possible grade? Once you know this, it is up to you to do the work required to get that
grade. To get the highest grade, it is usually expected that you give evidence of deep
learning and a little creative and critical analysis helps a lot.
You should not simply produce your work, submit it, and hope for the best. Ask your
teacher if they will review your draft or review your work in progress before you submit
it. Consider all of the feedback given by your teacher and spend the necessary time
making the necessary changes to get your quality up to the point it needs to be to get
the highest grade. You should not expect your teacher to tell you what your grade will
be (before you formally submit your assignment for assessment) but you should use the
opportunity to understand how you can make your assignment even better. Ideally, you
should ask your teacher to help you understand how to mark your own work.
Asking for help when your classmates understand better than you
If you find after a lesson that you did not understand the lesson well, then you should
feel comfortable asking for help. You can always ask your teacher but you should also
ask your classmates. If someone needs help and you can help them, then you should.
But if you are the one who needs help, you should ask for it. Do not let your pride stop
you from asking for the help you need in order to succeed.
Be brave
Many students who study in a second language can be shy about speaking up to the
teacher. They feel the teacher knows English much better and the teacher knows the
subject much better and the student is afraid of being embarrassed by saying something
wrong. You should not feel this way. You are a student. Your job is to learn. If you do not
know something, be brave and ask. Nobody expects your English to be perfect (even
native English speakers learn many, many new words while at University). Nobody
expects you to fully understand the subject. Everyone, including your teachers, expect
you to ask. So, be brave and ask.
Final thoughts
Being professional includes what you do inside and outside of class. Outside of class, you
should focus on doing what you need to do to learn the material. Inside class, you
should consider that time “special time” and not try to do other activities during that
time. You should have plenty of time outside of class to do other activities. Use your
time in class to focus on what is being taught.
Listening can be used during lectures, when discussing with others, or listening to audio
books, podcasts, or even radio and television shows.
Reading is used even more than listening. You read your textbooks, articles, your notes,
etc. Teachers constantly tell their students “Read more.”
The simple fact is that most students get their information through reading. If you want
higher grades, then you must show that you understand more. If you want to
understand more then read more. This is something university students constantly hear
from their lecturers, “Read more.”
Regardless of whether you are reading or listening, it does matter how much attention
you are giving the process of gaining new information. It is quite easy to read and then
quickly forget. Students have been doing this for hundreds of years. The problem is if
you read and remember the information just long enough to write your paper, you are
missing a very important opportunity. Remember, one subject will assume you have
understood those which come before it. For example, if you are taking a module on
project management, it is assumed that you have already learned the basics of
leadership, motivation, and teamwork. The new project management module will not
repeat this old information. Rather, it will introduce new information which is based on
the previous content. If you are unable to remember what you learned earlier, because
you were not focused on truly gaining new information (you were just reading and
quickly forgetting) then you will have great difficulty with the new, more advanced,
content. If you want higher grades, then you must read with the intention to learn and
remember for a long time.
This section of the book will go into much more detail on two key areas for
understanding: Reading, specifically critical reading, and listening, specifically listening to
lectures. It will also cover homework, understanding feedback from your teachers, and
there is a special chapter on the BTEC HND program.
Reading poorly
It is easy to read poorly and not even be aware of it. It is easy to pick up a book, and
start looking at the words, sounding them out, and moving down the page, paragraph by
paragraph. However, this does not lead to learning, which means it is a waste of time.
Reading to learn
When you are reading, limit the amount you read in one sitting. Your goal is not to read
as quickly as you can. Your goal is to read the right information and be able to remember
it and keep it with you for a long period of time. When you are reading, you should pay
very close attention to meaning. Take the time to think deeply about the points being
made. You should be connecting the new information to what you already know, adding
to your overall understanding of the world.
Read what is important, then stop and reflect on it. Think about how this new
information changes what you previously understood.
If you are doing a proper search on your subject, you will likely find hundreds of
thousands of papers to read. Clearly, this is going to be too much for anyone, especially
for someone reading in their second language.
First, you should carefully look at the titles of everything you find. Try to figure out
which of those are relevant and which are not. For example, if you are trying to apply
leadership principles to the CEO of Google, and you see the following list of articles:
So, you have eliminated articles 3 and 5 and it only took you a few minutes to reduce
your list down to 60% of the original size (you should already see how this can save you
hours of time reading unimportant information). For the remaining articles, if they are
proper research papers they will include an abstract. Skim the abstract (usually just 250
words or so per paper) to get a better idea about which is most closely connected to
your topic. Maybe all of them are and maybe none of them. Maybe just some of them.
The goal here is, again, to spend a little time and eliminate those articles which are
clearly unsuitable. You want to avoid reading anything which will not help you.
How much time will you spend reading each paper? It depends on many things. What
are you trying to learn? How deeply do you need to understand? Clearly a graduate
student needs to understand more deeply than an undergraduate student. You might be
able to read a 10 page journal article in two hours or it might take you two days. You
might need to read Article 1 for a day then read Article 2 for another day then return to
Article 1 to see how the two articles connect together and what information they are
missing.
There are multiple issues here. You need to improve your English so you understand all
the words being used (this is true even for native speakers because English has so many
words). You also need to improve your reading skills. Which parts of the paper should
you focus on? Should you focus on the methodology? The discussion? The conclusions?
Again, this depends on what you are trying to accomplish but the more you do it, the
more you will build these skills and the faster you will get. Just remember, read to
understand. Do not read just to say you have read it.
Do you need to read every word of every paper? No, certainly not. If you find a paper is
very closely connected to the work you are trying to do then you will want to read the
whole paper. If you find an article that is only loosely connected then you will want to
read those parts which are closest to your work.
There is a simple solution to this very common problem. It is acceptable to share your
research. You can share your reading, you can even share your notes from lectures.
However, you should never share what you write, until after the end of the semester. If
you share your work before the end of the semester, the teacher will naturally see that
students are working together when that was not part of the assignment. Anyone can
read anything so there is no problem sharing your research, just not your analysis.
If Suzi does not know how to write, then Sally can help her. However, Sally should teach
Suzi not just give Suzi a completed assignment.
Skimming and scanning allows you to ignore large pieces of writing. This is both good
and bad. It is good because it can allow you to ignore parts which you believe are
unrelated to the topic you are researching. However, by skipping sections you might be
missing information which is related to what you should be learning. For example, if you
are reading your module textbook for a class on project management and you need to
write about leadership, you will skip everything until you get to the section about
leadership. Then you will read that section and write your report. However, you might
miss the extended ideas and how those connect to other subjects. For example, you will
completely miss how team effectiveness is impacted by various factors including
Reading critically
Being critical about what you read simply means questioning everything as you read it.
The more you read and the more you understand the more you will naturally question
new information. However, you should remember to consider the new information and
also question the older information you read before. After all, part of the learning
process is learning that you used to believe something and now you learn it is actually
untrue, or perhaps partially untrue.
Metro Stores have been operating in this country for many years.
Recently they have been expanding by adding more stores across the
country. However, the company has never paid any income tax. The
government is investigating many firms for tax evasion.
Most students would read this and start to think several things:
Metro is making a lot of money because they are expanding (nobody would add
more stores if they were not seeing good profits)
Metro is bad because they are not paying their taxes
Metro has been doing these bad things for a long time
In the end, this story tells us nothing other than Metro has been operating in this
country for “many years” (but it is unclear what many years means to this reporter) and
that they have never paid income tax. The reporter really only included one clear fact:
Metro has never paid income tax. Metro cannot complain about the reporter lying
unless Metro has actually paid income tax. There are no other facts in the story.
This problem of bias is not limited to economists being paid to write about countries. For
example, if a famous media personality, for example a “talk show host,” has become
known for being against higher taxes then in order to maintain a consistent image that
person must make a statement against anyone who is claiming that society would be
better with higher taxes. Even if the new claim was backed up by clear, well documented
evidence, the media personality would not have the luxury of truly considering the
merits of the proposal simply because as a media personality, he must be consistent or
he risks losing those who support him by appearing to be weak or uncertain of his
beliefs.
There is an old saying “To the man with only a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.”
This applies here. If you have only one thing you can say, then it is not really important
what you say. We must always seek the truth, not to be right. We must always seek the
research of those who seek the truth, not those who want to prove that they were right
all along.
Consider a whitepaper. Is this a good source of information? Not really. The reason is, a
whitepaper is written by a company who is trying to sell their solution. For example, if a
company develops a new piece of software which prevents spam then they will usually
write a whitepaper showing some background on the topic and why their solution is the
best solution. The goal of a whitepaper is not to be academic, it is about convincing the
reader of a point. They may include both sides to a story but they may not fully include
both sides because that might weaken their argument. So, they include just enough of
the opposing view to convince you that they are addressing both sides adequately.
As a student, you will spend more time reading than doing anything else. This is normal
and expected. However, there are bad habits that you must correct and there are new
skills to learn. Skimming and scanning can help you but you must not skip over
information which can help you understand more deeply. You also much be critical on
what you read. Do not believe everything you read. When you read something, you
should try to confirm it from an unrelated source.
There are two big issues about listening during lectures: Paying attention and taking
notes.
Paying attention
To some, it seems simple. To pay attention you just need to pay attention. Just look at
your teacher and watch his lips as he speaks and you will naturally understand
everything he is saying. Unfortunately this is not true.
It is hard to pay attention if there are distractions. Here are just a few things which can
distract you, preventing you from fully understanding the lecturer:
Eliminate distractions
There are many, many things which can distract you. You might not be able to solve
them all but if you want to be successful you do need to solve as many as you can. For
example, turn your phone off (not on vibrate). Tell your neighbor that his phone keeps
distracting you and ask if they could put it in their pocket or their bag. If you sit around
people who distract you and you do not feel comfortable telling them to change, then
consider changing your seat. It is well known that students in the front row generally get
the highest grades so move to the front or second row. If those neighbors distracting
you are your friends then you have a bigger choice to make. Do you want these friends
who will stop you from being successful or do you want successful friends who will help
you to be successful, too?
Every point that your lecturer makes is for a reason. Your teacher has a lot of
information to deliver to you and a little time to do it. So, for each point, think about
how that relates to your experiences in the past. How does it relate to what you learned
Learning is always easier when you have more knowledge. That is, the more you know,
the more things you can connect to the new information when you hear it. So, the more
you read and the more you understand, the easier it will be to pay attention to your
lecturer.
Taking Notes
If you think you can remember everything said during the lecture, including what other
students say, either you have an amazing memory or you are tricking yourself into not
taking notes.
Everyone who is serious about studying, everyone who wants to succeed in university,
even in their native language, needs to take detailed notes during a lecture. The only
time you would not take notes during a lecture is if you truly knew all of the information
covered.
There are many techniques for taking notes and you should have learned some of them
when you were learning academic English. However, the most important things to know
about taking notes are:
You should be aware, research shows that writing notes with a pen (on paper or using
digital ink) results in a greater ability to remember the information than typing notes
into a computer.
“Once upon a time, on a dark and rainy night, there were three CEO’s
driving down the street. The first CEO was Tim Cook of Apple. The second
was Fred Smith of FedEx. The third was Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook.
Cook said to Smith, without you, nobody would receive their new iPad so
I thank you. Smith said to Cook, without you, nobody would be able to
use our iPhone app to schedule a shipment so I thank you. Zuckerberg
said, ‘Yeah, but without me nobody would like either of you two.’”
The point here is to keep your notes short and to the point. There is no need to write
very detailed notes during a lecture. You should write enough so that you can
understand your notes later but that should be easy, as long as you revise your notes as
recommended below.
Perhaps you should erase everything that was wrong but then there is a blank space on
your paper. What if you draw something but later have to fix that drawing to understand
the lecture content? How will you understand your notes two or three months from now
when you are writing your assignment?
1 Source: Ally-Cat
The solution is to not worry about making your notes perfect. The problem during
lectures is that you have very little time to take notes. So take the notes that you can.
Write down key words. Draw lines with arrows to connect ideas. Draw images if that
helps you to remember the important points. Use different colors when you are writing
to indicate different kinds of information. Find what works for you. It is okay if your
notes are very messy, because you will revise your notes (below).
Revising your notes means to re-write your notes. Start with a blank piece of paper and
re-write everything. Now is the time to make your notes beautiful. Reorganize them so
you can easily understand them later. Take your time and do this right. Your notes may
make the difference between a high and low grade on your assignment.
Remember, you will use your notes several times in the future but you will not use them
during the lecture. So, the notes do not need to capture all the information, just the
important points. The notes do not need to be beautiful because you can make them
beautiful when you rewrite them after class.
The purpose of revising your notes is so you have something you can use easily and
efficiently for years to come. You might take notes with pen and paper and revise your
notes by putting them into some electronic form. Whichever way you prefer to keep
your notes long-term, make them clear and easy to use. Remember, one university
subject may assume you remember what you learned in an earlier subject so those
notes you took in your first semester might be reused in the second, third, and later
semesters. So, take the time to do it right – you will be making life easier for your future
self.
Lecture time is a time for paying close attention to what the lecturer is saying. Do your
best to eliminate any distractions. Make sure you take detailed notes but do not worry
about making them beautiful during the lecture. You can (and should) make them
beautiful later.
Recording lecturer
If your lecturer allows you, you should consider recording the lecture. If you want to
record the audio, most lecturers will accept this. If you ask to record a video, many
lecturers will not be comfortable with that. Never take pictures or record without
permission. However, if you do record the audio of the lecture, you can take it home and
then listen again and compare it to your notes.
Imagine you are studying a 150 hour subject. You are expected to study 150 hours
(these are often called “guided learning hours). If you meet in class for four hours per
week for 15 weeks, that is only 60 hours. You are supposed to study the subject for
another 90 hours outside of class. Yes, some of those hours will be spent preparing for,
or completing, your assignments. However, there is still more for you to study. What will
you study? Will you simply grab your textbook and start reading random topics?
There are two types of feedback that teachers normally give their students: Formative
and Summative.
Summative feedback
When you submit an assignment your teacher will mark it and provide you with
comments on why you received the grade you were given and, often, what you can do
improve your grade in future assignments. This is summative feedback.
Summative feedback includes marking and the goal is to look at all (the sum) of your
learning. Did you show that you understand everything you are supposed to
understand? What quality was your output? Your grade represents part of the feedback
you receive. Your grade tells you the quality of your work.
Formative feedback
Your teacher may include opportunities for you to show your understanding throughout
the semester. For example, I often will ask my students questions like “Consider the
concept of the Triple Bottom Line. How would this impact Samsung or Apple?” By the
student’s answer in class, I can see clearly (and the student can also see) if the student
understands the information. If the student says “Uh um uhhhhh.” Then we both
(student and teacher) know that the student does not understand. This is an indication
that this student needs to spend more time studying this concept. If many students have
the same problem then it is a sign to the teacher that the concept is not being taught in
a way that most students can understand (and that students are not doing the work
outside of class which will help them to understand new topics). If the student gives an
answer but it shows simple thinking, as opposed to complex thinking, then the teacher
will often let the student know the quality of their answer and how the student can
improve their future answers.
In some cases, your teacher may not be marking your work. That is, your teacher might
not be providing and summative feedback. This depends on the structure of the course,
school policies, and many other issues. However, what is important is that the instructor
should always provide formative feedback and this is how you should know if you
understand the information at an appropriate level.
Think of yourself as a ship traveling across the ocean. You might not be able to see
clearly enough on your journey (your journey to learn). You need someone who can see
It is your responsibility to make sure you understand the feedback you receive from your
teacher. If your teacher says that you are not reading enough outside of class, then you
need to read more. If the teacher says your thinking appears too simple, then you
should make sure you understand, from your teacher, what good examples of complex
thinking are. You should not expect your teacher to show you exactly what you should
do. Part of your learning in university is to learn the process of deciding what is
appropriate. Just like your parents do not put your food into your mouth for you, do not
expect your teachers to do everything for you. Their job is to guide you. Your job is to do
the work.
BTEC is from Edexcel which is currently owned by Pearson, the large publishing
company. For background, an undergraduate degree in the UK often takes three years. If
you are studying in a TNE (trans-national education) provider, then you might have four
years. If you have three years, they are likely:
If you have four years, then the four years are more likely:
Here, we will simply refer to BTEC HND (and we will not use the term HNC).
Possible grades
BTEC HND modules include different kinds of grades from what you might be familiar
with. They do not use numbers / percentages. You do not get 90% or 50%. These
numbers have no meaning for BTEC HND modules. Instead, you have four grades you
can receive: Referral (fail), pass, merit, and distinction.
Each module contains some learning outcomes. If you show that you understand all of
the learning outcomes, then you receive a grade of pass. If there is even one learning
outcome that you do not show clearly that you understand, then you will receive a grade
of referral.
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomes are actually widely accepted in the educational community. The idea
is that anyone who has passed a certain module will have shown that they can do
certain things. These are learning outcomes (outcome means result, so learning
outcome means what you are supposed to learn as a result of studying this module).
BTEC HND modules normally have four learning outcomes. However, each outcome has
various points of evidence. That is, what is considered proper evidence that the student
has achieved the learning outcomes? It might be confusing, but these points of evidence
Some modules have only 10 outcomes and some have more than 15. However, an
assignment might not include all outcomes. It is common, but not required, for multiple
assignments to be given to for one module and the first assignment to cover Learning
Outcome 1 and 2 while the second assignment covers Learning Outcome 3 and 4. Again,
this is up to the person who designed the assessment (likely your teacher).
It is currently allowed (this is subject to Pearson making a change) for one outcome to
be on multiple assignments. This is not bad, it means you have multiple chances to pass
the outcome without resubmitting anything. It is required that all outcomes for the
module are covered by the assignments. That is, it is not OK for one learning outcome to
be skipped. This would actually make every student fail.
Pass
In order to pass a module, you must pass all of the outcomes. If there are 16 outcomes,
then you must pass all 16 to pass. If you pass 15 of them and fail one of them, then you
fail the module. Remember, the idea of outcomes is that you show you understand all of
these things if you pass. So, you must show you understand all, not most.
Merit
Merit is a higher grade than pass. You can consider merit to be 60% and distinction to be
70% (in the UK grading system – the US system is completely different in the way they
use numbers).
In order to get merit for a module, you must pass all outcomes and also get M1 and M2
and M3.
Example 1 of Merit
If your module has two assignments, A1 and A2. In A1, you pass all of your outcomes
and you also receive M1 and M3. In A2, you pass all of your outcomes and you receive
M2 and M3. In this case, you will receive merit for the module. This is because you
passed all of the outcomes and achieved M1 and M2 and M3. It does not matter when
you achieved M1 or M2. It only matters that you did achieve it.
Example 2 of Merit
If your module has two assignments, A1 and A2. In A1, you fail all of your outcomes. In
A2, you pass all of your outcomes and you receive M1 and M2 and M3. In this case, you
will need to fix your failed outcomes and resubmit. If you then pass all of your outcomes,
then you will receive merit for the module. This is because you passed all of the
Merit is generally what the average student should receive if they put in the required
150 hours (most BTEC HND modules require 150 hours of learning, some of which will be
in class).
Distinction
Distinction is a higher grade than merit.
In order to get distinction for a module, you must pass all outcomes and also get M1 and
M2 and M3 and D1 and D2 and D3.
Example 1 of Distinction
If your module has two assignments, A1 and A2. In A1, you pass all of your outcomes
and achieve M1 and M2 and D1 and D2 and D3. In A2 you pass all of your outcomes but
you do not achieve and M’s or D’s. In this case you will not receive distinction. You will
only pass (because you did not receive M3).
Example 2 of Distinction
If your module has two assignments, A1 and A2. In A1, you pass all of your outcomes
and achieve M1 and M2 and D1 and D2 and D3. In A2 you pass all of your outcomes and
achieved M3. In this case you will receive distinction. Again, it does not matter when or
how many times you receive M1 (or any other M or D).
Distinction is not easy and is given to the students do the most impressive work. These
students are expected to put in significant extra effort. This extra effort includes using
reflection (D1) reading widely or other significant effort (D2) and showing creativity (D3).
To be clear, what counts as D3 or M1, etc. is up to the person who designs the
assessment. So, be sure to read the assignment brief very clearly.
As always, you should remember that you should try for the highest grades possible.
Higher grades will always give you more opportunities for work and for further study. A
little extra effort now will make a big difference later so invest the time now.
As a student (and later as a professional), you are expected to produce your best work
the first time. If you leave out important information, then you are failing to show you
understand what is important. Your work will be marked based on what you submit, not
based on what you know but did not submit. Teachers mark based on evidence and that
evidence is the work you submit.
How you show your understand will be driven by the assignment type. Presentations are
quite different from reports just like essays are different from whitepapers. This section
will explain to you what the most common assignment types are. Next, you will see what
is meant by different activity verbs. That is, “report” and “reflect” expect very different
things from you. Since written reports are so common, you will see chapters dedicated
to each section of a report: Abstract, introduction, conclusions, paragraphing, etc. There
is also a chapter to teach you how to mark your own work. At the end of this section,
there is a chapter dedicated to giving good presentations.
Remember, this whole book is designed so you can read just the chapter you need when
you need it. For example, if you are writing an introduction, then you should read the
chapter about how to write an introduction. There is no need to read the chapter about
conclusions until you are ready to write your conclusion.
Scenarios
A scenario is not an assignment type; however, in many assignments you will be given a
“scenario.” A scenario is a situation that you should imagine that you are in. The
scenario might be based on an article from a magazine or newspaper or it might be
composed by the creator or the assignment.
You will also be given a role. For example, you may be a consultant-trainee at a
consulting firm. Your assignment tasks will normally connect directly to your role. If your
role is a consultant-trainee and you are giving a presentation to the managers of the
firm, you should not start your actual presentation saying “Hi everyone. I am Bob from
this class.” Keep your answers to the context of your role.
Case analysis
A case analysis is a more complex assignment type. Here you are given a case which
includes many details about some event. The details will include specific information
about your subject but will also include other information which might be relevant. The
case will normally include several questions for you to answer. Your goal should be to
answer the questions while showing deep understand of the subject.
A case can be one page or can be 10 or more pages long. The longer the case, the more
details you have. While you might want to have a shorter case so you can read it with
less effort, you should actually want a longer case. The reason is longer cases have more
details which will help you to give more complete answers. The shorter the case, the
more information you are going to be missing. This means shorter cases give you less to
work with, which means it is harder to show deep understanding.
Research report
A research report is a specific kind of report. Most often research reports include the
student collecting primary data (going out and collecting the data from interviews,
surveys, experiments, etc.) in addition to collecting secondary data (reading about the
data collected by others).
Report
There are many kinds of reports other than research reports. If your assignment is to
provide a “business report” then you are normally expected to do some research and
present it in a business situation.
Essay
If English is not your native language, then you likely produced many essays while
studying English. An essay can be as short as 150 words or can be 3,000 words or more.
There are many, many different types of essays. An essay is a written assignment and a
report is also a written assignment. The best way to understand an essay is to contrast it
to a report.
Imagine you are a busy corporate executive. You have much more to do every day than
you have time to do. Time is very valuable to you. You do not want to spend five
minutes on anything that you can do in two minutes. Now, if you are writing a report,
remember that you are writing for an executive. Write in such a way that allows the
executive to read quickly while still getting all of the most important information.
For both reports and essays, you should not include what is already in your assignment
brief. It is acceptable to repeat small parts in order to make your report faster to read
(so the reader does not have to refer back to the assignment brief) but you should not
be copy-and-pasting paragraphs from your assignment brief.
Presentation
Here you are expected to stand up in front of your class and give a presentation. The
assignment may require you to use PowerPoint slides or it might have other
requirements. Read Chapter 25 (How to Give a Good Presentation).
Presentation report
A presentation report usually has you prepare a presentation using PowerPoint slides
but you do not actually stand up and give the presentation. You will normally print your
slides and also the notes about what to discuss on each slide. This is a form of written
assignment, not a speaking assignment like a presentation or an oral exam.
Exam
Exams are written tests. You enter a room with other students, you are given an exam
paper and some answer paper, and you answer the questions. It is important that you
do not copy from other students (or cheat in any other way). It is also important that
you do not let other students copy from you. If one student copies from another, both
students will usually fail that exam.
When preparing for an exam, the four most important things you should remember are:
Study a lot, get a good night’s sleep before the exam, and drink enough water.
1. Study a lot
It is important to prepare for the exam. If you think you can just walk into an exam
unprepared and do well, then you are accepting a risk that you can avoid. Take the time
to prepare. You should prepare throughout the semester but closer to the exam day,
study extra.
Again, the night before the exam, go to sleep early and make sure you get lots of good
quality sleep that night. The extra studying you can gain the final night is worth less than
being rested for the exam.
You might be thinking, what about when your body has too much water? Will you be
allowed to leave the exam room to use the bathroom? Normally, you will not be
allowed to leave the exam room to use the bathroom (because it allows students to
cheat during the exam). However, if you use the bathroom just before you enter the
exam room, you will not need to use the bathroom again during the exam, even if you
continue to drink water. Normally exams do not last more than three hours and your
body should be able to store water for longer than that.
Practice exams
Because you are unlikely to know the questions on the exam before the actual exam,
you should consider creating your own practice exam. Think about what information you
have studied. Think about what the assessor wants to make sure you know (Do you
know the learning outcomes for the exam?). Then compose questions you think will be
on the exam. After you have your questions, wait a day or two and take a practice exam
at home. Some students find they can write much less than they thought and so it is
easy for them to run out of time during the exam. Do not wait until the actual exam to
discover this. If you discover problems early, you can find ways to solve them before it is
too late.
Oral exam
An oral exam is like a regular exam except your answers are not written, they are
spoken. You will be given a question and you will speak your answer to that question. If
your answer shows a deep understanding you will receive a good grade. If your answer
is weak and general you will receive a poor grade. If you fail to answer at all, you will
Oral exams are normally much shorter than exams. Often you will be given a single
question and have two to five minutes to give your answer. If you are in a room with
other students, you will have the benefit of listening to the answers from the other
students. Use this opportunity to make sure you understand well before you give your
answer.
Overall
In all assignments you will be given questions to answer or tasks to complete. When
composing your answers, you want to show the deepest understanding you can. Your
grade will depend on the quality of the work you produce.
In general, you want to make sure you include relevant theories or ideas which are
important to the study of the subject. You should be able to explain those theories in
your own words. You also want to make sure you apply those theories (to the case or
scenario you are given). If you are able to, produce critical analysis and include any
recommendations you feel are appropriate.
Make sure you clearly understand what is expected of you. If you are given a question,
make sure your answer actually answers the question. Many students look too quickly at
a question and then write an answer which answers a different question. It should not
be surprising when those students get a very low grade. You must answer the question
asked. You must perform the task as stated. You can do more, but you cannot change
the question or the task to something you think is better.
If your teacher is your assessor, be clear with your teacher about what they consider to
be proper. Just because you read something here does not mean that all assessors will
agree. Be clear – ask.
Final thoughts
There are many different assignment types you might receive while studying at
university. This chapter should give you a basic idea about what is meant by each
assignment type and how they differ from one another. However, you should be clear
with your teacher what is expected from you.
While the intention of this chapter is to help you to understand what the task verbs
mean, you should always confirm with your teacher to know what they are actually
expecting.
Analyze: You are expected to identify the components (pieces) of an idea or a system
and show how they impact each other. Example: Analyze the responsibilities of a tax
practitioner. [Consider the different responsibilities. Are there any conflicts? What
should the person be most concerned with?]
Apply: You are expected to take a theory or a concept and show how it would be used in
a given situation. Example: Apply Herzberg’s theory of motivation to Samsung. [Give a
clear example of how a manager at Samsung would use the theory to improve
motivation levels.]
Assess: (See also: Evaluate) Here you are expected to make a judgment. Is something
good or bad, helpful or harmful? Example: Assess the impact of monetary policy on
businesses and their activities. [Consider what are the many ways that monetary policy
can impact businesses. Consider which impacts are positive or negative for the business
or for society. Judge whether this is good or bad.]
Calculate: Use a specific formula or technique to determine the answer. The answer will
usually be a number or a set of numbers but it is also important to show the process you
used. Example: Calculate costs using appropriate techniques. [You will have been taught
different techniques for calculating costs, show you understand those techniques by
actually performing calculations using them.]
Carry out: (See also: Perform, Undertake) Here you are expected to do something. You
should write to show you have actually done what was asked of you. How you should
you write it? Generally you should report it (see Report below). Example: Carry out work
activities meeting the operational plan. [Write about the activities you actually did which
support the operational plan.]
Choose: (See also: Select) You are expected to select one from many choices. You should
justify your choice (why did you choose that one). Example: Choose a targeting strategy
for a selected product. [Consider all the different targeting strategies you have learned
and pick one. Explain why you selected that strategy over other options available to
you.]
Compare: You are expected to show you understand different choices by identifying the
important qualities of each choice. Example: Compare and contrast different
organizational structures and culture. [You should have learned many structures and
cultures. Identify what are the important qualities of each and how they are similar and
different.]
Complete: You are expected to produce something but you may be given a starting
point. For example, you may be given the structure and you must fill in the data.
Example: Complete relevant documentation and tax returns. [You should use the
theories and formulae you have learned, categorizing the data you have, and fill in the
forms with the correct numbers based on that data.]
Create: (See also: Produce) You are expected to actually produce something new.
Example: Create a plan for the collection of primary and secondary data for a given
business problem. [You should have been given a business problem. You must plan out
how to collect primary and secondary data. The collection of data should target the
business problem.]
Demonstrate: You are expected to show you can apply theories. Example: Demonstrate
how buyer behavior affects marketing activities in different buying situations. [You
should write about various buying situations and apply the theories you have learned
about buyer behavior and marketing.]
Describe: You are expected to explain something. Often this will be a list. Example:
Describe the different users of financial statements and their needs. [List all of the
people/entities who would use financial statements. Describe what needs are specific to
each person/entity.]
Discuss: You are expected to show you understand something by explaining it in your
own words. Example: Discuss the significance of international trade to UK businesses.
[Use your own words and write about how UK businesses are impacted by international
trade.]
Draft: (See also: Create, Produce) You are expected to create something. Draft means to
write which means to create a piece of writing. Example: Draft suitable management
letters in relation to a statutory audit. [You are expected to consider the information
which belongs in the letters. You should also consider the audience for each letter and
what language and information is appropriate for them.]
Explain: (See also: Describe) You are expected to show, in your own words, you
understand something. Example: Explain the responsibilities of an organization and
strategies employed to meet them. [Here you should look at a company and what
responsibilities it has. All companies share some common responsibilities but each
company might also include additional responsibilities unique to it. Explain these in your
own words. You should also explain what strategies the company uses to meet the
responsibilities you wrote about.]
Formulate: You are expected to communicate some information as a formula or you are
expected to use a formula to create something. Example: Formulate and record possible
research project outline specifications. [You should create, according to the formulae
you have learned, an outline of a specification for a research project.]
Identify: Here you are expected to remember something, perhaps a list. Example:
Identify the sources of finance available to a business. [You should remember the
sources of funding for a company. You should list them and also write a brief
explanation of each.]
Illustrate: You are expected to apply some theories. Example: Illustrate the general
principles of European law. [You should remember the general principles of European
law and you should apply them to some situation.]
Importance of: This is not a verb but when you see “importance of” you should show
why it is important. One way of showing how something is important is to give an
example of what things would be like if that thing was missing. Example: Explain the
importance of leadership style on team development. [You should explain why
leadership style is important. If you look at team development and ignore leadership
style does it give you a complete picture?]
Interpret: (See also: Analyze) You are expected to explain what something means. Often
you will be asked to interpret some data. Example: Interpret and analyze the results in
terms of the original project specification. [You should consider the resulting data
carefully and see what it really means. How does it impact stakeholders? Does the data
mean that the conclusions of others should be reconsidered? How does one piece of
data have meaning when considering another piece of data?]
Justify: You are expected to give supporting evidence for a decision which was made
earlier. Example: Justify the selection of a strategy. [You should evaluate the choice of
strategy. The decision might be yours or might be from a case. You want to show you
can judge or evaluate the impact of the decisions against some known standard and you
want to show that it was right. Justify means to evaluate in a positive way. That is, you
must show why it was the right decision.]
Match: You are expected to consider two different lists and connect items from one list
with items in the other list. Example: Match resources efficiently to the project. [You
should consider the resources that you have and what tasks need to be done. Then you
should make sure that resources are being used in the proper way. For example, if you
have four people on your team and you have three people working quite hard and one
person is not doing anything then you have not matched your resources well.]
Plan: You are expected to create a plan which will accomplish some goal. You should
write, as a reporter would, explaining the facts. Example: Plan and deliver the
assessment of the development needs of individuals. [You should consider the
individuals, what they are able to do, what they should be able to do in the future, and
what kind of training or other development they need and evaluate those needs. You
should write about the plan as well as how you delivered that plan.]
Produce: You are expected to create something. Example: Produce graphs using
spreadsheets and draw valid conclusions based on the information delivered. [You
should create graphs using a spreadsheet program. You should also give your opinion
about what is important about what the graphs communicate.]
Propose: You are expected to make a recommendation. Example: Propose ways in which
lifelong learning in personal and professional contexts could be encouraged. [You should
consider the ways you have learned to convince people that they should continue to
learn during their entire life. How do you convince people that learning should not stop
after graduating from university?]
Record: (See also: Report) You are expected to report on what you did. You should write
like a reporter, communicating the facts. Example: Record the audit process in an
appropriate manner. [You should report on the audit process you performed. You
should report based on how you learned to report.]
Report: (See also: Record) Write as a reporter would. Write about facts that you observe
or discover. Example: Report on existing processes of communication in an organization.
[You should explore the existing processes used for communication in an organization
and then write about what you found, covering all the facts without including your own
opinion.]
Select: (See also: Choose) You are expected to remember the options available and then
choose one of the options. You should also explain why you chose that option over the
others. Example: Select appropriate budgeting methods for the organization and its
needs. [You should identify what the choices of budgeting methods are and then identify
which is the best for the chosen company. You should explain why you made your
choice.]
Show: You are expected to demonstrate that you remember. Example: Show macro and
micro environmental factors which influence marketing decisions. [You should list the
factors and what each of them means. It is always best if you apply the factors to show
deeper understanding.]
Suggest: You are expected to apply theories to a situation and choose the best choice
out of many available. Example: Suggest improvements to reduce costs, enhance value
and quality. [You should show your understanding of what techniques are most efficient.
Consider what the company does currently and make a clear recommendation about
how they can lower their costs without sacrificing quality or value.]
Undertake: You are expected to actually do something and then give evidence that you
have done it (perhaps by reporting on it or perhaps there is another natural way that
evidence is shown). Example: Undertake a critical review of key references. [When
performing secondary research, you should make sure you read critically, understanding
both sides of each relevant issue. If you are producing a literature review, that will be
your evidence. If your literature review shows critical analysis (both sides) then you will
have done what is expected of you.]
Final thoughts
These task verbs give you an idea about what is expected of you when you are creating
your assignment. You should not consider this chapter as a final authority. You should
always confirm with your teacher to be sure you understand clearly what is expected of
you.
In your report you will write quite detailed information for each of these points. In your
abstract you will write only one to three sentences for each point. Remember, your
abstract must fit into a tight word limit.
One limitation of the research is that only 166 individuals were surveyed
and those surveyed were required to communicate in English. It is
possible that other respondents who are unable or uncomfortable
speaking English would answer the questions in different ways.
The abstract above totals 248 words and allows the reader to very quickly see if they
want to invest the time to read the full report.
Final thoughts
Your assignments may or may not require an abstract. Ask your teacher to be clear what
is expected of you. If you to create one, you make sure that all of the most important
information from your report is included. Abstracts are supposed to be short. So make
each point short and clear.
Introductions are read first but they are often written last (but before the abstract). The
main purpose of an introduction is to prepare the reader for reading what you have
written. In short, the introduction is where you tell the reader what you are going to tell
them.
Normally, an introduction should include some background and the purpose of your
writing, including the scope and limitations. An introduction does not need to be long
but it is common for it to be between 6% and 9% of the overall length of your report or
essay. If you find your introduction is shorter than this, then perhaps you are not giving
enough information on the background or the purpose. If your introduction is longer,
then you might be going into too much detail (save the details for the body of your
writing).
Remember that the reader is reading your report for the first time. You might have read
it 15 times, during your editing, but the reader has fresh eyes and needs to understand
where this writing fits into the world of writing. Here is an example of an introduction
for someone writing a report about legal contracts.
ABC Company has hired XYZ Legal Consultants to review several open cases, as
well as some hypothetical issues, and give our legal opinions. The cases were
delivered to us in a report which detailed the specifics of each case. We are
basing our understanding on that report.
Due to the fact that these cases were not fully investigated by XYZ and we were
only given a report explaining the important elements of the cases, it is possible
that some details were not included in the report from ABC which could
materially impact the legal ruling. However, we have researched all applicable
Our interpretation of each case will include both how we believe a judge would
normally look at the facts of each case as well as recommendations on how to
present the case to the judge to be most favorable to ABC.
This introduction is 200 words long. If the assignment is 2,500 words, then this
introduction is 8% of the total length.
Notice the opening of the introduction. It starts with a very general statement about
contract law. This statement is not specific to the details of this report. It is very broad
and gives the reader some idea about where this writing fits in the world. This writing is
going to be about contract law.
The next section of the introduction gives some background. The background here
includes who the parties are (ABC is the reader, XYZ is the author) and how the author
received the information necessary to complete the report.
The third paragraph discusses the limitations of the report. Reports will usually have
some limitations. You must be careful about this. It can be tempting to write excuses
instead of limitations. Do not do that. You must actually write the limitations.
You do not need to write an introduction in exactly four paragraphs. In your writing, you
might not have limitations (essays about feelings do not normally include limitations but
research reports always include them). There is a certain art to writing and part of being
a good writer is learning what is proper in different situations. If you are unsure, consult
your teacher.
Excuses are reasons why you failed to do what expected of you. For example, “I did not
have enough time” is a common excuse from students. If you were given one month to
write a 3,000 word report and your research is expected to be done through internet
research then you have plenty of time. In fact, one week should be plenty of time to
complete such a report. However, if you chose to sleep late, spend time socializing, or
If your teacher did not give you all the information you need to complete your
assignment, that is also an excuse. As a student, you are expected to go out and find the
information you need to complete your assignments. Your teacher is there to help you
but it is your responsibility to verify the information the teacher gives you and you are
expected to read about more than just what the teacher explains in class.
If you are asked to write a 3,000 word report, you should not consider word count as a
limitation. 3,000 word reports are common and all university students around the world
are expected to complete them. You are expected to be able to communicate important
information in a few words. You are expected to be able to summarize, edit, and
generally reduce your writing to the essence by reducing the number of words you use
to the minimum. Word count is not normally a limitation.
These points are from the BTEC module Organisations and Behaviour (OB). If you are
studying OB then anyone reading the report knows what the learning outcomes are. This
introduction does nothing which benefits the reader. It simply takes up space, which is
never the goal of writing.
It is also unacceptable to simply copy-and-paste a section from the assignment brief. The
introduction should be from you, not from someone else.
Final thoughts
Introductions are like the front door to the house you have built for the reader. By
walking through the introduction, the reader should have a good idea about what they
are getting themselves into and what they can expect for the rest of their stay. As the
host, the author, you should take the time necessary to create an entrance which is
inviting and useful for your guest.
Analysis is your thinking. Your job as a student is to learn something and then show your
understanding, hopefully showing some unique understanding that others have not
shown before.
If your analysis is very good, then your grade will be very high. If your analysis is very
weak, then your grade will be very low. If your analysis is average, then your grade will
be average.
The reason why 80% should come from you is that if most of the writing comes from
someone else then you did not show that you understand – you showed that someone
else understands. You should not have 100% from yourself. You need to make
statements, opinions, and you need to support those opinions with evidence (this is
academic argument). You get this evidence from others. For example, if you write about
leadership, you may make want to use the work of Daniel Goleman to support your own
analysis. This is normal and it is expected. If you do not have any work from others then
it is really just your own opinion without evidence, which means very little. You need
evidence for everything you say, unless it is common knowledge.
A better rule
The 80/20 rule is a good starting rule but it falls short in some important ways. The main
purpose of the rule is to simply make sure inexperienced writers include enough of their
own analysis and also enough supporting evidence without being too heavy on either.
That said, the 80/20 rule is not a rule at all. It is simply a starting point for those without
much academic writing experience.
There are plenty of research papers which include close to 80% from others (leaving only
20% for the author). These tend to be survey papers which are focused on reviewing the
existing literature on a topic. Because of the nature of the writing, the author will not
include much own-analysis.
There are also plenty of papers which include 90% from authors (leaving only 10% from
others). These papers tend to explore areas without much research done. For example,
early work in a new field might only have a few papers to cite. Each citation might be
explored much deeper using logic as opposed to providing supporting evidence from
other academics.
Types of analysis
When you are given an assignment brief (also called an assessment), you should read
carefully what kind of analysis you are being asked to produce. If you are unclear, ask
your teacher – that is why your teacher is there. The following are from Bloom’s
taxonomy. Bloom’s taxonomy categorizes the different ways you can show you have
learned something and they start off being quite simple and move up to become
increasingly difficult. While Bloom’s taxonomy covers a wide range of areas, we are only
going to discuss the cognitive (mental) aspects. That is, we will not cover motor skills like
how to show you have learned a new dance.
Remembering
This is the most basic. For example, can you remember the six leadership styles
according to Daniel Goleman? Can you remember key facts, dates, etc.? Can you
remember categories used for some purpose?
Generally, questions that test remembering are straightforward and you either know the
answer or you do not. The answer is usually not open to much interpretation.
Key words that tell you the assessor is looking for you to show that you remember:
Name, describe, write, tell, list, relate, state, define.
Example
The lowest layer in Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs includes physiological
needs like food, water, and shelter.
This answer is clearly right and could easily be verified by anyone familiar with the
subject.
Understanding
Here, you are being asked to show not just that you can remember something but that
you also understand what that means. You might remember the names of Goleman’s six
leadership styles but that does not mean that you understand them.
Key words that tell you the assessor is looking for you to show you understand: Explain,
predict, translate, compare, outline, discuss, summarize, restate.
If you were asked to “Summarize what happened when Toyota introduced the Prius in
the US, “ then the teacher is checking to see if you understand what happened.
Good example
Toyota introduced the Prius to the US car market by sending 4,000 of
them to American in the year 2000 (Smith, 2001). However, at the time
there was no clear desire that American consumers were interested in
anything other than traditional gasoline-powered cars. Toyota took a big
chance but they were successful. They actually sold out of the initial
supply of Prius cars quite quickly and the American public started asking
why Toyota did not send a larger initial supply. Toyota responded that
there was no indication that Americans were interested at all in hybrid
cars but they would make more (Jones, 2005).
This is a good example because it shows very clear, very thorough understanding of the
issue. The answer is relevant with plenty of details. It uses citation properly but there is
plenty of analysis which is not from someone else. There would be no doubt in the
teacher’s mind that the student understands the issue being assessed. The student is not
just paraphrasing someone else’s work; the student clearly understands and has
academic support for the statements of fact.
This is a bad example because it is lacking in any meaningful details. The student has a
single fact which is not supported with any evidence (no citation). It is unclear if the
student is simply guessing or copying from someone else without proper citation. The
second and third sentences are the student’s opinion but there is no evidence (support)
for that opinion. The writing has a feeling of being hollow, empty, and simply too little.
The teacher will naturally wonder if the student understands anything other than the
year the Prius was introduced to the US. When the teacher marks this student’s
understanding, they would likely say that the student does not understand, because
there is no clear evidence of understanding.
Applying
Here you want to take a concept that you have learned and apply that idea in a new
situation.
Example 1: Illustrate how you could use affiliative leadership to rebuild trust after the
previous leader destroyed trust within your department?
Example 2: Classify the four managers in the story using Goleman’s six leadership styles.
Key words that tell you the assessor is looking for you to show you can apply: Use,
illustrate, classify, show, complete, solve, examine.
If you were asked to “Show how SuperBank could use the Andre Change Management
Model to implement a new quality management system,” that would require applying
the specific model to this specific company.
Example
“The Andre Change Management Model (2013) supports a company
going through three phases, iteratively, within a larger framework with a
strong focus on empowerment and communication. As a state-owned
enterprise, SuperBank has employees which follow a typical bureaucratic
organizational system. The workers work and the managers decide.
The second phase will be to implement the change. During this second
phase for the CCD, we will actually make the changes. The changes will
likely include additional monitoring and more computer systems to
capture more information which can later be analyzed. After all,
statistical process control depends heavily on data and the new QMS will
certainly require more data to support this new process.
The final phase of the CCD step is to stabilize the QMS in the CCD. The
workers need to know that the changes are here to stay and are a new
way of doing business, not just something management wants to do
temporarily. Once stabilized, the model calls for us to repeat.
Repeating means we consider this first step complete and we start the
second step, which might be implementing the QMS in with the bank
tellers. For this second overall step, we would again have the three
phases of plan, do, and stabilize.”
This analysis is good because it clearly apples the model in question to the company in
question. While there is one key element not covered by the student’s analysis
(communicate constantly), that is not a problem because of the six key elements, the
student covered five of them well enough to show understanding. The student also
reduces the repeating phrase “quality management system” with QMS to make it
shorter but clearly defines it on the first use and uses proper citation formatting.
Analyzing
Here you want to look at the pieces of a larger issue. From those pieces, understand
how they relate and connect together. Here you make a difference between what is
known (fact) and what is believed because of other information.
Example 1: Explain what invalid assumptions the manager is making in this case.
Example 2: Study the IT department’s operations and identify the training needed to
improve operations.
If the teacher instructs you to “Explain the process of handling a customer return” then
the teacher is likely trying to see if you can properly analyze it.
The next step is to find out the underlying reason the customer was
unhappy with the product. This should be done after you have already
confirmed to the customer they would receive a refund or store credit.
The reason for this is that if you ask before, the customer may answer not
based on honesty but rather based on a calculation of what will get them
the refund they desire.
This analysis starts to break down the complex situation of a customer wanting a refund
into smaller components and describes how those components interact, showing clear
understanding.
Evaluating
Here you want to make clear judgments. For this, you must understand what all of the
options are, the impacts of choosing each option, and which impact is most desired.
Example 1: Rate the six leadership styles in their ability to build a cohesive marketing
team.
Example 2: Which kind of leadership would be best when you want your team to respect
you, and why?
When you are asked to evaluate, you must make a clear judgment. Some students
confuse “evaluate” and “report.” To report is to write about what happened, as a
reporter would do, sticking to the facts. To evaluate means to judge. If you are asked to
evaluate and you simply report, then you are not doing what was asked of you.
Key words that tell you the assessor is looking for you to show you can evaluate: Rate,
choose, assess, prioritize, justify, decide, recommend.
Good example
According to Shanahan (2001), the proper judgment of team
performance should consider four elements: Inputs, outputs, process,
and structure. The structure of our team was quite strong. We setup
rules for achieving as well as maintaining membership as well as
accountability standards. All four members of the team contributed to
the design of the structure as well as performing their tasks. Assignments
were not individually determined but rather determined for each
member by the group as a whole. This increased the commitment of the
group as a group to ensure that each member actually performed
adequately. In the end, we found that each member was able to
complete their tasks on time, with one exception. That exception
stemmed from a personal issue for that member and we believe that it
would not be repeated. In short, the team performed quite well.
This answer included not only a basic judgment about the performance of the team but
judged that performance against an academic standard (Shanahan’s model of team
effectiveness). While you might be allowed to make a simpler judgment, one without
reference to any third-party criteria, to do so is not recommended simply because it
shows laziness on the part of the student. Notice also that the criteria used are from an
academic (Shanahan). This answer certainly has some problems. For example, the
student referenced four elements of Shanahan’s model but only included details for
one. This is not a great answer but it is a good answer.
Bad example
For this paper, I interviewed my father who is a manager at a local
manufacturer. He said the most important way to judge a team is simply
to see if everyone is happy. We were all happy at the end; therefore, I
can say that our team’s performance was quite good.
This answer is bad because the standard for judgment of the team’s performance is a
non-academic standard. While it might be reasonable if the person who came up with
the standard was a well know business person, it is always better to focus on academic
standards.
Creating
Here you are expected to actually create something. To create something you must first
understand the important information around the specific area. After you understand
the surrounding information then you need to know what exists already (so you do not
create something that already exists), then you need be able to actually create
Example 1: Imagine another style of leadership other than the six proposed by Goleman.
Key words that tell you the assessor is looking for you to show you can create: Invent,
create, design, plan, imagine, compose, construct.
Your options
You get to choose what you write which means you get to choose how deep your
analysis is. Just because you are asked to apply does not mean that you cannot show
critical thinking or creative analysis. You can always do more than you are asked to do. If
you have read extensively and you understand most of the major motivational theories
and you see that they all failed to consider one important issue, like the issue of cultural
differences, then you certainly can point that out and you can even come up with your
own theories of motivation which do take into account that missing element. Of course,
coming up with your own theories in your undergraduate studies is difficult, but it is not
impossible, if you have read and understand enough. Even a weak theory that shows
deep understanding will help your grade be higher.
This analysis is a terrible response. The reason is that the student was asked to compare
different styles in different situations. First, the student did not write about any
situations. Second, there was no comparison. Consider the following improvement:
That is better because it is talking about situations but it is still not right. The task was to
compare and there is no comparison taking place. The student must compare leadership
styles in different situations. “Styles” means at least two styles per situation. “Different
situations” means at least two situations. There is no other way to interpret that task,
but your teacher may want to add something to it; for example, saying that you must
cover at least three different situations (always ask your teacher to be clear about what
is expected from you). Now, consider the following:
Now, it is true that the above only discusses a single situation but you should see the
critical analysis. The writing above discusses the positive and negative sides of coercive
leadership in this specific situation and it also discusses the positive and negative sides
of democratic leadership in this same situation. If you wanted to add innovative analysis
then you just need to come up with a unique idea and integrate it into your writing.
One more thing you should see is that in order to show proper understanding, it takes a
certain number of words. If your assessment does not have any minimum word count,
do not think you can write very little and still get a high grade. If you want to show deep,
complex understanding then you will simply need to use more words.
There is a reason your teacher always says “read more.” It is through reading that you
learn and to research usually means you will read a lot. You either do the work or you do
not. Just understand that if you make a recommendation without doing the research, it
will be obvious to the assessor that you have not done the research. Remember, your
assessor has read thousands of papers. It is common that an assessor reads more than
1,000 papers each semester. They know when you have read a lot and when you have
not.
Whenever you make a recommendation you should first make sure that it is
appropriate. For example, if you recommend that Toyota force their dealers to sell cars
at the same price, this is illegal. It is illegal (in the US and UK) under price-fixing
(collusion) laws. The dealership is owned by someone other than Toyota and, therefore,
the dealership gets to determine at what price they sell the inventory they own.
Another issue might be that the company already does what you are recommending. For
example, if you recommend that Toyota implement a quality management system, this
shows that you have not done much reading because Toyota is quite famous for their
quality management system (the Toyota Production System). Therefore, this
recommendation would not be appropriate.
This is our opinion. This is a good start but it has no evidence to support the opinion.
Unsupported opinion means nothing to an assessor so we need to add some evidence.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He was the CEO of Apple and well
known throughout the world.
This is bad. We start with our clear opinion but the evidence actually has nothing to do
with our opinion. The fact that Jobs was the CEO does not mean he was coercive
because some CEOs are coercive and some are not. Now we revise it to the following.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He was the CEO of the world’s largest
company which was famous for building great products. Great products
Now our evidence starts to support our opinion but our evidence is quite poor. The
reason is that just because some companies make great products by paying attention to
all the details does not mean that Jobs himself paid such attention to details. Perhaps it
was someone else in the company or perhaps there is another reason for the success of
Apple’s products. We revise it again.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He always made every decision about
every little detail in every process.
Now we have opinion and some evidence that supports our opinion. We are doing
better but there is still a problem. The facts that support our opinion are an issue. How
do we know these facts? Did we just guess them? This is not common knowledge so we
need to cite the source of the information.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He always made every decision about
every little detail in every process and would often scream and anyone
who would fail to do what he ordered (Isaacson, 2011).
Finally, we have an academic argument. We have our opinion that Jobs was a coercive
leader and that opinion is supported by logical evidence from a trusted source (the
authorized biography of Steve Jobs). Always make sure your evidence is good evidence
(see Chapter 17: How to give good evidence).
1. You must come up with your opinion (you get this from reading a lot)
2. You must support that opinion with good quality evidence (which you get from
reading a lot)
Applying theories
University studying is about learning theories and learning how to apply those theories.
If you are writing about leadership, then you need to show that you understand
leadership theories. One example of leadership theory is Goleman’s work. Do you
understand his theories? If so, write about them and then apply them. If you truly
understand something you should be able to explain it in a few words. You can also
apply it to a company. For example, you can apply Goleman’s theory of coercive
leadership to Apple by showing the evidence that Jobs was a coercive leader.
If you think you understand five, you might misunderstand two and correctly understand
three. If you write about two of the five you might include one you do understand and
one you think you understand but do not. When the teacher reads this, they will see
that of the things you wrote, you misunderstand 50% (one of the two). This might be
enough for the teacher to fail you. Now, if you write about five and you really
understand four the teacher will see that you understand 80%. It is still bad (you should
not misunderstand at all) but perhaps the teacher will consider it enough that you
should pass. The best is to write about as many points as you can, making sure you
understand them all clearly enough that if you get one or two wrong, there are so many
other points that you do clearly understand that the teacher will not question it and will
not only pass you but give you a good grade as well.
Be careful not to write about unrelated ideas. Your teacher is looking to see if you
understand part of that includes you understand what is not relevant to the task.
Final thoughts
If you want to receive good grades on your assignments, you need to make sure you
know how to show that you understand deeply. It is important to use academic
argument and good quality evidence. Make sure you write enough. It takes a certain
number of words to show understanding. If you write too little then your grade will be
lower simply because it is unclear how much you really understand. Write enough.
Some students do not understand how to write a paragraph and they end up creating
one paragraph that continues for many pages. This is very hard to read, makes your
writing less beautiful, and simply shows a lack of understanding of how to write
properly. This chapter will help you to make sure your writing has the proper structure
by creating proper paragraphs.
After the introduction sentence, you should write your topic sentence. This is the
sentence which the paragraph is all about. If you want to say that democratic leadership
is a good all-around leadership style, then say that in one sentence here.
After your topic sentence, you want to include some support sentences. After each
support sentence, you want to include evidence for the support sentences.
You should finish your paragraph with a conclusion or a transition to the next paragraph.
It does not need to be more than that. Of course, you can experiment with stronger
topic sentences. Writing is an art and you should experiment to see what you like best.
This sentence is direct and clearly supports the main idea of this paragraph. Of course,
here we are assuming that engaging our workers is good and something we want to do. I
believe almost every executive would agree with that.
You can see that our statement that democratic leadership increases employee
engagement is clearly supported by actual research (by Jones in 2009). We have
properly cited that research.
You can see the first sentence introduces the topic. The central idea of this paragraph is
that democratic leadership is one of the best from which to choose.
There are three sentences which support this main idea. The supporting points are:
Each of these support points is followed by clear, academic evidence, cited properly.
The final sentence transitions to the next paragraph which will be about affiliative
leadership.
Notice also that the paragraph is not too short and it is not too long. It is 122 words long
and if the average page contains 350 words, then this paragraph is about 35% of the
length of the page.
Final thoughts
Paragraphing is extremely important but it is also something that is easy to get wrong.
Students often include too much or too little in each paragraph. However, you should
always remember that each paragraph has one main point, supporting points, and
evidence for each supporting point.
What is evidence?
Quite simply, evidence answers the question “Why should I believe you?” Think of a
judge with two people in court. Person A claims Person B stole a watch. Person B says
that is untrue. What will the judge do? Of course, the judge needs evidence. How does
Person A know that the statement is true? If Person A can only say “Well, because I think
so,” the judge will completely ignore Person A and Person A will not get the desired
outcome.
It is the same with writing. The reader is our judge. They will naturally be questioning
everything we claim to be true so it is our duty to provide evidence that will convince
the reader that our opinions are the right opinions.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He always made every decision about
every little detail in every process and would often scream and anyone
who would fail to do what he ordered (Isaacson, 2011).
Academic argument is our opinion followed by some evidence that supports our
opinion. The evidence that we use to support our opinion needs to be reasonable,
relevant, reliable, and recent.
If the evidence was that Jobs was hated by many people, is that reasonable?
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. Many people hated him (Isaacson,
2011).
We must find better evidence. Good evidence would be something which relates back to
an accepted definition of coercive leadership.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He always made every decision about
every little detail in every process and would often scream and anyone
who would fail to do what he ordered (Isaacson, 2011).
Here, the evidence is close enough to one of the generally accepted definitions of
coercive leadership. We can see that anyone who behaves this way will be considered
coercive. Jobs did behave this way, and we know that because Isaacson said so in his
biography of Jobs in 2011.
Steve Jobs was a coercive leader. He was adopted and felt like he was not
accepted by his parents. Therefore, he demanded that he be accepted by
his subordinates. This was a form of compensation.
Is this reasonable? It does seem to be. We can see the logical connection between the
psychological impact of being adopted and how that might cause someone to behave
later in life. However, it is unclear why this is relevant. It might be relevant if you are
writing a biography of him but if you are writing about leadership styles then being
adopted as a child does not seem very relevant. Normally, people do not choose to be
adopted and we are writing to help people better understand what they can do to be
better. This does not mean we cannot include information of a highly personal nature
about a famous leader, if we know it to be true, but it does mean we must make sure it
relates closely to our opinion.
This evidence would be more relevant if our opinion was that great leaders often have
significant challenges as children and we include the information about Job’s adoption
Credible people
Walter Isaacson is a very well respected writer. He has written several well received
biographies of historical figures. His biography of Jobs, published in 2011, was
authorized by Jobs and he interviewed Jobs many times. Isaacson also interviewed
everyone else connected to Jobs including Bill Gates, Al Gore, and many others. He had
access to the information and he has a reputation for telling the truth. Combining these
facts together, we can feel confident that if Isaacson wrote something about Jobs, it is
true.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a great source of information but it is not reliable for academic writing. The
reason it is not reliable is that anyone can change it at any time. If you check the
population of Vietnam, it might say 90 million. You can then log in and change that
number to 20 million. Someone else might log in and change the number to be 20
billion. Because of this, we should use Wikipedia to get ideas but we should never use
Wikipedia as our evidence because it is not reliable – we do not know that it is true at
the time we read it. However, at the bottom of each page on Wikipedia there are usually
links to source data. If you go to these links you might find a reliable source which you
can use as evidence.
Blogs
What you read on a blog might be true or might be untrue. You should judge a blog both
by how it is written (does it seem reasonable to rely on it) and by the reputation of the
author. This is why it is important to read widely – read many different authors to get
both sides of the story. If you have read other writing by that author and the author
seems to be a credible source, then it would be acceptable to use as evidence. If it is just
a random blog and we know nothing about the author or we see the other writing of
that author is unreasonable (the sky is red, birds do not fly but rather they are carried by
invisible dinosaurs, etc.) then we should not include that blog as evidence, even if it
supports our argument.
Peer-reviewed journals
Some publishers are reliable and some are not. If you read something from Academy of
Management, you can generally trust it. The reason you can trust it is that this journal,
before it publishes anything, sends articles through a peer-review process. That means if
you write something to be published there, they will take your paper and submit it to
News organizations
Big news organizations like CNN, BBC, Financial Times, Bloomberg, etc. usually have “fact
checkers” who have the job to make sure that the facts that they include in their reports
are true. For this reason, you can usually trust reporting from these sources.
Some of these sources (for example, Fox News) also include non-reporting (opinion)
information. The non-reporting should not be used as evidence. It can be difficult to tell
the difference between reporting and non-reporting but you must learn to evaluate
based on what they claim. This takes time and energy on the part of the student but it is
a necessary part of academic writing. Like most things, the more you read, the easier it
gets.
Company websites
It is common for students to get information about a company from that company’s
website. Is this an acceptable source? Well, it depends.
There are some pieces of information which are closer to hard facts. Information like:
Information like this is generally acceptable to get from a company’s website because
the company usually has no motivation to give out untrue information about these
items. If a company has 50,000 employees, why would they say they have 100,000
employees? While it could happen, it is unlikely and it is quite easy to verify so the
chance of the company being caught in a public lie is too high for them to take the risk.
Company culture
Company values
It is quite common for companies to write on their website “Our people are our most
important assets.” However, some of those companies will immediately lay off workers
when the calculations show that the company will make more money with fewer
workers. Even if a company feels that employees are “easily replaceable pieces in a
machine” they will not write this on their website because it will cause them problems
when they are trying to hire workers.
Essay websites
Many students look to websites which contain essays written by other students. This can
be OK but you must consider the source. The website does not write the content; they
depend on others to post their own content. You cannot judge the content by the
website because they are not the author and they do not do any checking of the writing.
You must look to see who the actual author is and judge if that author is a reliable
source or not. In the end, this usually takes much more effort than simply doing your
own research.
Books
It would be great if all books were reliable but they are not. There are reliable books and
unreliable books. The reason why you should read a lot is that by reading more you can
better judge what is reliable and what is not. If a text is assigned by your teacher, then it
is more likely that this text is reliable but there are university texts which inaccurately
summarize famous pieces of writing.
Final thoughts
When we use evidence that is unreasonable, irrelevant, unreliable, or outdated it makes
us, as the author of the opinion, appear to be unreasonable and people will stop reading
what we write. They will simply give us a low grade and move on. Moreover, if our
readers see that we often use poor evidence, that can impact our future by limiting the
quality of recommendation letters (see Chapter 27: Letters of Recommendation)
teachers will write for us.
Make sure your evidence is good evidence and you will see your grades improve.
Detailed examples
The following will show you how to reference properly in different situations.
Journal article
Author: John Smith; Publisher: Journal of Management; Title: How we learn; Date: 15
Jan 2001
Research shows that despite claims that different people have different
preferred learning styles (reading vs. listening) everyone learns best
visually (Smith, 2001, p. 215).
Note: If we know the page number (we normally know the page number for a book), we
should include it.
Research shows that despite claims that different people have different
preferred learning styles (reading vs. listening) everyone learns best
visually (Smith and Jones, 2001, p. 215).
Research shows that despite claims that different people have different
preferred learning styles (reading vs. listening) everyone learns best
visually (Smith, Jones, and Thompson, 2001, p. 215).
In his research, Smith shows that despite claims that different people
have different preferred learning styles (reading vs. listening) everyone
learns best visually (2001, p. 215).
Note: Since we wrote Smith’s name in the text, we do not need to add it in the
parentheses with the date.
Web page 1
Author: Unknown; Publisher: Business Times of the Pacific; Title: How we learn; Date:
Unknown
Notice that if the human author is unknown, we consider the publisher to be the author.
This is often called a “corporate author” and we use the full name, because there is no
family name for a company. Also, notice that we never put a web address (URL) or even
the domain name in the in-text citation. The full address belongs on the Works Cited
page (see below).
Also notice that if there is no known date of publication, we use the abbreviation n.d. to
indicate “no date.”
Web page 2
Author: Unknown; Publisher: Unknown; Title: How we learn; Date: Unknown
Research shows that despite claims that different people have different
preferred learning styles (reading vs. listening) everyone learns best
visually (How we learn, n.d.).
Notice that if the web page is clearly not authored by the website (so the website is not
the author), and we do not know who the human author is, then we use the title of the
article or the title of the web page.
However, in this case, we do not know the author which means we have no reason to
believe that we can trust this author. This is not good academic evidence and we should
not cite it.
1) Find the original work (Goleman’s work was in Harvard Business Review in 2000).
Once you have that article, you read it (to make sure your book is correct about
how they describe it) and then you cite the original article.
2) You use the following format: ...coercive leadership involves the leader
demanding immediate compliance (Goleman, 2000 quoted in Smith, 2008). When
you use this format it is clear than you are giving credit to the original author
In all of these examples, you may notice we do not use first (given) names. For an author
of John Smith, we do not include “John” in the citation, we simply refer to the author by
the family name of “Smith.” We also do not include titles. We do not say “Mr. Smith” or
“Dr. Smith” we only call him “Smith.”
You may also notice that the parentheses for the citation normally come at the end of
the sentence. They actually belong inside the sentence so you should place the period
(dot) after the parentheses.
If your teacher is not referencing anyone else’s work and is simply speaking from
personal experience, you can cite the teacher’s personal experience but this is generally
considered an anecdote (a short story to illustrate a point) and not considered valid data
for academic purposes. If your teacher is referencing their own research, read that
research and cite what you read. If your teacher is citing their own research and has not
published it, then you can cite what your teacher said during class.
If you are unclear whether your teacher is referencing the work of someone else, you
should ask so that you are clear. If you do not have access to the original work, ask your
teacher for help.
You should always properly cite those whose definitions you use, even a dictionary.
However, when you have a choice, it is always better to use an industry-specific
definition. Legal subjects have very different definitions than common usage for many
words like consideration. So, use the subject-specific definition whenever possible.
One warning sign is if you have quotes around a sentence and you have no citation with
it. This normally means you know you are using someone else’s words but you have not
cited properly. Avoid this mistake because it is plagiarism.
Must I use a Works Cited page at the end or can I use footnotes?
In Harvard referencing, it is allowed to use footnotes but not to identify the work you
have cited. The full reference should always be on a page at the end of your writing.
Footnotes1 can be used for additional information. For example, if you believe that most
readers will already be familiar with an idea, you might not want to explain the idea in
detail in your text. However, for those few readers who might be unfamiliar with the
concept in question, you might add a footnote for them to better understand your
writing. The footnote is just for additional information. It is not for identifying the work
that you have referenced.
Is it OK to reference Wikipedia?
No. While Wikipedia is a great source of information, we cannot rely on the accuracy of
that information for one main reason: Anyone can update it at any time. Another reason
1
Footnotes are like this – little notes at the bottom of the page with additional information to help a
reader more fully understand, without forcing the reader to search an external source.
On Wikipedia pages, there are supposed to be references (proper citations). These are
normally at the bottom of the page. If you see some useful information on that site,
then go to the referenced source and confirm the information, then cite the referenced
source.
This would actually fail for plagiarism. The reference at the end only covers the one
sentence immediate before the reference. That is, the section in red below is plagiarized
and the green section is properly referenced.
Students often think that one reference can cover the whole paragraph or, indeed, the
whole page. These students are often surprised when they fail for plagiarism.
1) Add a reference after each sentence. This is not so beautiful but it satisfies the
requirements.
2) Indent the entire block and cite the block. This is more readable but it implies
that this is actually one quote and not a paraphrase. This looks better but is
technically less accurate (but the student is unlikely to fail for plagiarism using
this approach).
(Goleman, 2000)
3) The best way is to re-write it so you do not need to have a citation after every
sentence. Just describing leadership styles without saying anything meaningful
about them or without analyzing them or applying them in any way is a bit boring
(boring leads to a very low grade). Better to write something insightful about
each one. This will have the benefits of showing greater understanding as well as
making it more readable.
1. In-text citation – Here you add some reference to the text you are writing (see
above) to show the reader that this work belongs to someone else. Basically, the
format is (family name, date). If you know the page number (for example if it was
from a book) then you should include that as well (Smith, 2001, p. 23).
2. References page – At the end of your paper you add a page where you include
detailed references to all of the works you cited. You only include references on
this page if you have matching in-text citations for them. Normally you will not
include everything you read, just what you have cited.
Works Cited
Decarie, C., 2010. Facebook: Challenges and Opportunities for Business
Communication Students. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(4), pp. 449-
452.
Lamont, T., 2010. John Maeda: Innovation is born when art meets science.
[Online]
Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/nov/14/my-bright-
idea-john-maeda
[Accessed 9 October 2012].
Xu, Y., Kim, H.-W. & Kankanhalli, A., 2010. Task and Social Information Seeking:
Whom Do We Prefer and Whom Do We Approach?. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 27(3), pp. 211-240.
First, go to the References tab, set the style to Harvard, and then click on Insert Citation
and Add New Source. If you do not see the style Harvard, then ask your teacher for help.
It is possible to add styles to Word. You can also search for this information online.
To be sure that you have entered the author’s name in the correct format, click the Edit
button and enter the author’s last name and first name. You can add multiple authors
here and Word will format them properly for you.
When you want your Works Cites page produced, click on Bibliography.
Using Word’s ability to manage your references is extremely helpful when you need to
change some detail (say publication date) and you have many citations to the same
piece of writing. Change it in one place and Word will update all of the in-text citations
as well as the Works Cited list.
Final thoughts
Proper referencing is important. We should do it both because it is right to give credit to
others for the work they have done and because we may fail for plagiarism if we do not.
Harvard referencing is actually quite simple. There are usually three common sources
you will cite: Web pages, journal articles, and books. With just three options, there is not
much to remember. Better than remembering is to let Word do the work for you.
Making recommendations
In research reports, it is often expected that you will make recommendations. It is
common for research reports to include a “Conclusions and Recommendations” section.
That section may, or may not, be followed by a separate conclusion section. This can be
confusing but Conclusions and Recommendations is about what you conclude
(determine to be true) from your research. The final Conclusion section is where you
conclude (finalize) your writing.
If you are going to write a recommendation, make sure you show that you did the work.
When a student makes a recommendation like, “To become more successful, the
company needs to clearly create a plan to attract the right kind of customer.” This kind
of recommendation is extremely weak. It shows that the student did very little work and
this student should expect a very low grade. If you recommend “attracting the right kind
of customer” then explain what is the right kind of customer? Also, how should they
attract them? It is like a teacher telling a student “In order to improve your grades, I
You can also take this as an opportunity to trigger a thought in your reader’s mind. Ask a
question to make your reader start thinking about something you want them to be
thinking about after they put your paper down.
Conclusions should also avoid focusing on any minor points you made. The conclusion is
a place to draw the reader’s mind back to the big picture. The reader has just read all of
your details and you want to make sure they walk away from the paper thinking about
the important points, not the trivial ones.
One paragraph should be your target, unless you are told otherwise by the person who
will assess your writing.
Final thoughts
Conclusions are the place in your writing where you should help the reader return to the
real world. You brought them into your world, you showed them around in great detail,
now it is time to bring them back. You do this by summarizing what you have already
said but do not bring up new information. It is also an opportunity to pose a thought-
In case you did not see the example of a conclusion, look at the paragraph above (below
Final thoughts). It is the conclusion for this chapter.
What is an appendix?
An appendix is a section in a report where the author puts information which might be
useful to the reader but does not makes sense to include in the body of the text because
it distracts from the points the writer is trying to make.
This is quite logical, when you think about it. If the student was allowed to show their
understanding in the appendix but the appendix is not included when counting words,
then there would not be a word count limit. If the teacher did not want a word count
limit then there simply would be no such limit.
In addition, anything in the appendix must have some value to the reader. If it is not
useful to the reader, then it does not belong anywhere in your writing, including in the
appendix.
You should always ask yourself, “If the assessor does not read anything in my
appendixes, will that affect my grade?” If the answer is yes, then do not put that in the
appendix. You should assume your assessor will ignore everything in your appendix.
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Never include anything in the appendix which is not referenced in the body of your
writing.
In the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (see Appendix B), you can
see that the unemployment rate has been steadily improving for 10
years.
Final thoughts
Appendixes are for information which might be useful, but not required, for the assessor
to see what you understand. They do not count towards word count but they also do
not count to show your understanding. Assume your assessor will ignore everything in
your appendixes so do not put any critical information there. It might get read, but do
not depend on that.
Note: The examples in this chapter are not about content, they are simply about
formatting – the presentation.
If you are writing for an assessor (whether your teacher or someone else) you should
consider that the person who will read your writing may be reading the work of
hundreds of other students. One minor problem in formatting, when repeated hundreds
of times, can end up having a more powerful negative emotional impact on your
assessor than you might think. So, take some time, follow these guidelines, and make
sure your formatting is as good as your content.
Fonts
It is important to consistently use the same font throughout your writing. There is
nothing wrong with changing a font when you have a good reason to do so (for section
headings, for example). However, the bulk of your text should always be in a single font.
If you copy-and-paste from a website (or other document), it is common that the font
comes along with the text when you paste. If that font is different (and it usually will be)
from the font you write in, it will give a very unprofessional image to your writing (and
therefore to you). Consider these two examples for illustration.
Example 1: Consistent
There are 754 different leadership styles which are widely accepted.
These styles have been introduced by 11 different writers. The most
popular in academic texts on leadership is the work of Daniel Goleman
published in 2000 where he labeled six common styles. We can see from
this that just a few writers have given us so much information about
leadership. Indeed, the innovative writers, those who introduce names
for leadership styles can be counted on two hands, if you can borrow a
finger from a friend.
Example 2: Inconsistent
There are 754 different leadership styles which are widely accepted.
These styles have been introduced by 11 different writers. The most
popular in academic texts on leadership is the work of Daniel
Goleman published in 2000 where he labeled six common
styles. We can see from this that just a few writers have given us so
much information about leadership. Indeed, the innovative writers, those
As you can see from the second example above, the difference in font immediately
causes the reader to ask, “Why is this text in the middle different? Is there something
the writer is trying to tell me by making this text different?” This is distracting from your
message and you want to avoid that.
Paragraphs
Paragraphs are the building blocks of a written report or essay. Just as you need to
understand how to structure the content within and between paragraphs, so must you
be concerned with the formatting of each paragraph, as well as all paragraphs taken
together.
Example 1
There are 754 different leadership styles which are widely
accepted. These styles have been introduced by 11 different
writers.
We can see from this that just a few writers have given us so
much information about leadership. Indeed, the innovative
writers, those who introduce names for leadership styles can
be counted on two hands, if you can borrow a finger from a
friend.
As you can see in the example above, there is a clear, visual break between paragraphs.
When the reader is reading, they can quickly scan the text and see where the next
paragraph begins. This makes the reading process flow much easier than the following
example.
Here, the visual break between paragraphs is missing. When the reader is reading, if
they scan down the left side of the text, they cannot see where the next paragraph
begins. They must now switch to scanning down the right side, see where the paragraph
ends, then scan to the left, and go down one line with their eye to get to the start of the
next paragraph. While this might not sound like a lot of work, it becomes tiring for the
reader after a few pages of doing this.
In this third example, we have indented the first line of each paragraph. The main reason
this is done is when there is no blank line between paragraphs. This accomplishes the
same goal of paragraph identification. Both Example 1 and Example 3 are generally
considered acceptable although Example 1 is easier to read than Example 3 because the
reader can even scan down the middle of the paragraph and see where the paragraph
ends.
Example 4: Double-spaced
There are 754 different leadership styles which are
from a friend.
In Example 4, there are clear visual breaks but each line has a blank line in between. The
“line spacing” is doubled, so we called it “double-spaced.” This is a common way to write
for someone who will mark your paper. The reason is that the extra space leaves room
for the assessor to make notes on your writing. If your writing is all squeezed together,
the only space to make notes is in the margin and that might not be enough space for
the comments the assessor wishes to make.
Just like with fonts, it is important to be consistent in your line spacing. Whatever you
choose to use, you should use throughout the document. Consider this example to show
this point more clearly.
Example: Inconsistent
There are 754 different leadership styles which are
widely accepted. These styles have been
introduced by 11 different writers.
Naturally the reader would wonder what is different about the middle paragraph. Is the
author trying to communicate something by using different spacing? This is often an
issue when copy-and-pasting from another document, just like it is an issue with fonts.
Make sure your spacing within the paragraph is consistent throughout your document.
One way to show that you appreciate their valuable time is to write using as few words
as possible. Another way is to bold key words to make them stand out, or to give them
emphasis.
Example
There are 754 different leadership styles which are
widely accepted. These styles have been
introduced by 11 different writers.
When you bold the most important things in your writing, whoever is reading it can
quickly scan the text and when they see something interesting, the can stop and read
more. This style of formatting can allow a busy executive to understand the essence of
your report in 10% of the time it would take to fully read the entire report.
Full justification
There are two common styles of justification in academic writing, as the following two
examples show.
Left justification is preferred by some, usually publishers. For others, they consider the
“unclean right edge” of the text to be more painful to look at. If you have not been told
which to use, use full justification as more people will consider it more beautiful in
general.
Formatting numbers
Different languages have different standards for formatting numbers. Considering the
amount of money 10 million Swiss francs and 10 centimes (a centime is 1/100 of a
franc). What is the proper way to format this number?
In French, the proper format is CHF 10.000.000,10. This is a very common way to format
numbers in many languages around the world, but not in English.
It should NEVER be written as CHF 10000000.1. This option is extremely difficult to read.
When you are writing in English, you should always format numbers using the proper
format for English: The separator between whole numbers and fractional numbers is a
period (.) and a comma (,) is used to group the whole number section into groups of
three.
In English, you should spell out numbers less than 10. That is, you should count like this:
One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12.
Formatting dates
Just like formatting numbers is different in English and many other languages, so is the
way dates are written. Consider the following date: 4/5/2001. Which date is this,
exactly? Is it the 5th day of April in 2001 or is it the 4th day of May in 2001? How about
when you read that an important anniversary is 3/10? Is the celebration going to be on
the 3rd of October or on the 10th of March?
In English, the month is written first, then the day, then the year. So, 3/10 is the 10th of
March.
Of course this can cause problems if your native language is Spanish and your reader’s
native language is also Spanish and you both know each other. Your reader may assume
that you are writing in the standard Spanish format and 3/10 represents the 3 rd of
October. For this reason, there are better ways to format your dates: Spell out all or
part of the month
3 March 2001
3-Mar-2001
These two options make it extremely clear that the date you are trying to communicate
is, indeed, the 10th day of March.
Final thoughts
You do not want anything to distract from your message, from the points you are trying
to make. Poor formatting will distract the reader. So make sure your formatting is done
correctly and consistently throughout your writing.
What is reflection?
Reflecting is about looking back at your work like a third-party would. Just as you look at
your reflection in a mirror to see how others see you so should you look back at your
work to see how others might see your writing.
To properly reflect back upon your work, you want to evaluate your work.
Bad example
I wrote a lot and I read my textbook so I think I did a great job.
The reason why this is not good is that it is very weak reflection. There are still too many
questions left unanswered. For example: Is writing a lot of works the way we should be
judging the quality of someone’s writing? Writing more words without saying anything
new does not seem to be a good criteria for this.
Criteria
Criteria are those standards against we can judge something. For example, criminal
judges use the standard of the criminal code. That is, they compare the actions of the
person on trial against the written criminal code to see if the person has committed a
crime. In this case, the criteria are the criminal code.
There are different criteria for different purposes. Each set of criteria will generally be
useful for judging one category. For example, consider the SMART criteria. We often use
SMART to judge objectives.
Here we evaluate the objective “To achieve at least 25% market share of Vietnam’s tea
market before the end of 2018.” If we have created this objective, we should be able to
reflect and evaluate if we have written a good objective. To do this, we apply the SMART
criteria.
Good example
Criterion Evaluation
Specific Yes, it is clearly understood what it means. Two people will
usually see this in the same way and there will not be confusion.
We are talking about market share in the Vietnamese tea market.
Measurable Yes, it is clearly measurable. We can measure market share by
adding up the total sales all companies who sell tea in Vietnam
and then dividing how much tea we sell in Vietnam. That will give
us our market share.
As you can see from the table above, we have evaluated our objective against the
appropriate criteria.
Inappropriate criteria
Now, consider we are hiring someone and we want to evaluate our performance in the
hiring process. Can we use SMART?
Criterion Evaluation
Specific This does not make sense. How can performance be specific?
Measurable It is not clear how we measure our performance.
Achievable This does not make sense.
Relevant This seems too generic to judge in this case.
Time-bound This does not make sense. We are done. We are not bound by time.
You should see that SMART is a terrible set of criteria for evaluating someone’s
performance in the hiring process. So, to properly evaluate in this case, we must find
criteria appropriate to what we are evaluating.
Finding criteria
Your assignment may include some specific criteria to use for judgment (for example,
SMART, 6C, etc.) or you may need to find your own. If you need to find your own, do not
worry. Just start searching or asking people you know. There are different criteria for
evaluating many, many different things. What you need to think through is whether the
criteria you found are appropriate for what you want to judge.
Whenever you choose a set of criteria, you should explain why you chose that criteria as
opposed to others that might be available. You should not simply grab some criteria off
the internet and apply it. Why should the reader believe that this is a reasonable set of
criteria to use?
Any time you use a set of criteria you should always introduce it. Some criteria are well
known, such as SMART. However, you should not assume that a set of criteria you found
is well known to the reader. So, take one or two sentences and give a proper
introduction to the criteria you are going to use.
The best thing is to find some criteria. How should we judge driving to school? What are
the criteria? Should drivers obey the rules of the road? Should drivers be polite to other
drivers? What does being polite really mean? How can we judge if someone is polite to
other drivers?
Creating criteria
You could form your own criteria but it is better if you can use the criteria of someone
who has spent significant time formulating the criteria. Of course, if you can spend
significant time formulating the criteria, then you should let other people know (publish
it) so they can benefit from your thinking.
Final thoughts
Reflecting is an important skill to develop. Part of that skill is learning how to find the
right criteria for evaluating different situations. It is through this skill that you will
develop greater independence in your learning so make a habit of reflecting on
everything you write. You have just read this. What criteria would you use to see if you
read this well?
This saying rings true with professional writers around the world. The simple fact is that
the first time you write something, you have created a draft. Do you want your grade to
be based on the quality of your first draft?
As we learned earlier (in Managing your time), what you get is often the natural result of
what you give. If you put the minimum amount of work into something, then you will
get the minimum grade (for example, zero). If you want a good grade then you must be
willing to put in the time to improve the quality of your writing. This chapter will help
you do that.
1. First draft
a. Then revise
2. Second draft
a. Then revise
3. Final draft
a. Then revise
4. Final version this is what you submit
Write freely for your first draft. Just write and write and write some more. Once you
have written everything you think might be important, take a break. You cannot edit
well with a tired brain. After you have written your first draft, stop for the day. Do not
look at your writing again until the following day, to give you a fresh perspective.
When you are editing your first draft, first look at the overall structure. Does the report
“flow” like you thought it would? Does it communicate what you wanted? Are there
ideas that do not belong in the report at all? Are the ideas in the right order? Reorder
the paragraphs to get the overall flow and idea sequence correct. Review your
arguments and the evidence you use. Improve your opening “hook” if you included one.
Editing the second draft is usually easier because it already flows better and there are
fewer mistakes and fewer ideas which do not belong in the report. Still, go through the
entire writing from the first to the last page. Check the paragraph structure. Are your
On the third draft, see if you can improve the way you transition between ideas, check
once more for the overall flow and a final check for spelling, grammar, and punctuation
errors. Now you have your final version.
Now, there is no fixed rule which says you must have exactly four versions. You might
want more. You might feel completely comfortable after editing your second draft. It is
all up to you. Writing is a skill and one that takes experience. Writing also gets easier the
more you read.
It is not uncommon to spend more time editing than writing. Personally, for every hour I
spend writing something, I may spend another two to four hours editing it. Editing takes
a lot of time but it is worth it. The quality of the work is so much higher, which means
your grade is so much higher. If you want higher grades, spend more time editing
When you revise your first draft, then you can start worrying about the word count.
To further reduce your word count, go back through every sentence and remove any
word you can. It might sound silly but removing one word per sentence can end up
reducing a 4,000 word report down to 3,300 pretty easily.
That is 20 words. Now, how can we reduce this? Which words can we remove? How can
we rewrite this sentence so it is smaller?
The other day, I was daydreaming of a ski trip in France with my love.
This is much better. Now we are down to 15 words (we reduced the sentence by 25%).
Now, how can we reduce it even more?
Now we are down to 10 words. We reduced this sentence by 50% and with more work
we might be able to reduce it even further.
Final thoughts
Reducing word count, while saying the same thing, increases your “information density”
and naturally feels like much higher quality writing. Most writing can be improved in this
way but it does take time. Are you willing to spend the time in order to get a higher
grade?
Many students worry about what mark they will receive. That is normal. After all, your
grades are important and they stay with you for the rest of your life. However, every
student should know their mark before they submit their assignment. At least, they
should know the “band” of their mark. That is, is it a pass, merit, distinction, 40-50%, 60-
70%, or 80-90%?
It is common practice in many schools for students to be given a rubric. A rubric is a tool
to guide the person marking your paper. The rubric will tell you what categories the
marker is supposed to look for and what constitutes which grade for each category.
For example, there might be three categories: Theory, analysis, and presentation. You
need to read this content carefully. For example, you might see the following
information (modified from a rubric for the University of Sunderland, UK):
Fail (<40%)
Use of theory: The report fails to identify the relevant theories. Theories
are not properly described. There is no evidence that the course text or
other reliable sources are used. Theories used are not relevant to the
tasks.
Pass (40-49%)
Use of theory: The report identifies some of the relevant theories to the
task. Theories are partly described. There is some evidence that the
course text or other reliable sources are used. Theories are sometimes
relevant to the task.
As you can see the quality needed to achieve a passing grade is quite low. Theories used
are sometimes relevant to the task? If you cannot identify the correct theories then you
did not do any meaningful work for the module so of course you would fail. Similarly,
argument and presentation for pass is also quite simple. You should never try just for
pass. You should always do better work than this.
If you produce a report for a company at the level of pass (spelling and grammatical
errors, difficult to read, etc.) it is unlikely anyone will have respect for your writing. They
might fear you if you can get into a high enough position but they will never respect you.
To gain the respect of others, you must show that you deserve respect. You do that by
producing good quality work. Look to the expectations for higher grades than just pass.
Look to the highest and see if you can commit the time to produce that quality of work
(it does take time). I know you can produce good quality work. The question is, are you
willing to invest the time to do so?
70% +
Use of theory: The report identifies all the theories relevant to the task.
Theories used are described in detail. There is clear evidence that course
text or other reliable sources are used. Theories are significant in the
completion of the task.
Basically, it is saying you should do everything right. You should include all the right
theories, none of the wrong theories, use good academic sources (including lecture
notes), you should apply the theories to either information you were provided or that
you found while researching, and you should not make spelling, grammar, or referencing
errors. This is not an unreasonably high standard.
Information density
One of the ways of measuring quality of writing is how dense is the information. Imagine
you are eating some cake and that cake is mostly air. It might taste delicious but a small
piece does not satisfy you, so you need to eat much more. When you are writing,
Final thoughts
If you are given a rubric then you should be able to reflect on your work and give
yourself a grade. That grade should be close to your final grade. If not, talk to your
teacher and see how you can improve your skills in marking your own work.
The reason is exactly because students are afraid of it. That fear comes from a lack of
confidence and confidence comes with experience. So, when you are given the
opportunity to give a presentation, do not consider it a terrible thing. Would you prefer
to wait until you are at work? At work, a failed presentation can strongly negatively
impact your career. It is much better to practice in a low-risk environment so that you
will be able to present well, when it counts most.
Preparing for a presentation requires both physical as well as mental work. It is very easy
to get a presentation wrong but this chapter is designed to help you avoid those
problems so that you can give a good presentation when you are asked to do so.
Speak slowly
If your English is strong, you may be tempted to speak as quickly as possible in order to
communicate as much information as you can. This is a very common problem with first-
time presenters (including new lecturers).
You must understand that the audience does not know as much as you. You are there to
help them to understand. If you speak too quickly, you are forcing them to understand
too quickly. Understanding what someone says is like eating. You need to take a bite,
chew, wait for a moment, then take another bite. If someone is feeding you (consider
the presenter as feeding information to the audience), you would be much more
comfortable if they feed you one bite at a time. However, if they take a sandwich and
shove the whole thing in your mouth at once, you will not be able to eat it. You will spit
it out, and you will not have eaten anything.
It is the same with presenting. You must speak slowly. You are speaking to a group of
people and you want all audience members to understand you, not just some of them.
Remember this rule: It is better to present less information but present it well. You do
not get more points for speed. So, be kind to your audience and go slow.
Speak thoughtfully
When you say something, you should have a reason for saying it. Do not just repeat
something you read somewhere. Writing is quite different from speaking. Just as you
You should always avoid saying anything which distracts from your message. Do not go
off on a different topic. Deliver your presentation the way you planned. Always avoid
making sounds which are not words (avoid saying “uh” or “um”).
Breathe
It may seem silly to remind you to do something your body does automatically but when
someone starts to panic, they forget to breathe properly. They either breathe too slowly
(or stop breathing for a short time), which reduces the oxygen in their blood, which
negatively impacts their brain performance. Or, they start to breathe too fast, which
puts too much oxygen into their blood.
You should always make sure you are breathing calmly and deeply.
Pause
There are many reasons to stop talking while presenting. Some presenters think they
should always be talking and if they stop, the audience will wonder why they are not
talking. This shows a lack of understanding about how the brains of the audience
members work.
One reason to pause is if you put a lot of text on a slide (which you should not do). You
need to pause, to stop talking, to give the audience time to read the slide.
Another reason to pause is if you say something which is unusual, you want to give the
audience time to consider what you said. Let them think about it. It is like feeding
someone: You must give them time after a big bite before the next one.
You should also know how to pronounce numbers. 1,000 million should be said as “one
billion” and 1,000 billion should be read as “one trillion.” To hear “one thousand billion”
sounds very strange in English.
Use charts
The old saying “a picture is worth 1,000 words” is important here. If you want to
communicate information about the value of a university degree, one chart can explain
more than three pages of text. Consider the following:
Likewise, avoid using images with watermarks (words written through the image to
prevent others from using them). These watermarks are there to tell everyone that you
do not have the right to use that image (so using it is a violation of copyright).
It is common to find images online but you should only use images that you have the
right to use. You need to pay to remove the watermark and you did not. This creates a
very bad image for your presentation and for you (it shows you stole the image). So,
stick with images that are clean.
The follow two images are just two good looking sample images which were found and
allow reuse without paying anything for them. All you are expected to do, for these
images, is to give credit to the creator of the image (which you should do anyway in
academic writing).
You should remember that there are many sources of images which can be reused for
free. New sites come out all the time but certainly two you should consider using is
Google Images (above) and Flickr. Flickr, like Google Images, includes the ability to
search by usage rights.
Hook
When you write a paragraph, the first sentence might be something to grab the reader’s
attention. The same is true in presentations. Open with something interesting, shocking,
or unusual. You only have a few seconds before the audience decides to pay attention or
ignore you. Here are some examples:
Hooks can be longer than one sentence. You can stretch them into 20 or 30 seconds but
do not make them too long. It is very important that the hook you use is closely
connected with your topic. Do not start with “You can be rich and beautiful if you know
the secret” when your presentation is actually about protecting the environment.
Introduction
Remember presentations should always have an introduction. This is where you open
the box that contains everything you want to discuss in your presentation. The
Body
Here you want to talk about the points you introduced in your introduction. For each
point you have, go into some detail. Remember that you want to give clear examples,
use solid evidence, and make your points as easy to understand as possible. Talk about
theories and apply those theories to show that you understand deeply.
Conclusion
The conclusion is a way to close the box that you opened in the introduction. You want
to put away everything you talked about and remind the audience what they should
remember from the presentation. It can be as short as “In short, you can see that being
a good corporate citizen can help a company not only to increase its consumer brand
value but also to decrease its operating costs substantially. I hope that each of you will
keep these points in mind when you are making the decisions that come before you in
the coming years.”
If making eye contact with people you do not know well makes you nervous then try to
identify two to three people in the audience that make you feel comfortable and make
eye contact with them. Do not just stare at one person – that will make everyone
distracted. If you do not have anyone in the audience who makes you comfortable, then
look just over the tops of each person’s head. To the audience, it will look like you are
making eye contact with someone just behind them. Avoid looking at the ceiling or the
floor. This makes you look less confident and you want to look more confident when
giving a presentation.
Do not lean
Posture is important. You should stand or even walk around a bit (not running, do not
look like a crazy person). However, you should not lean. When you lean on a desk or a
wall or anything else, you are telling the audience that you are unstable and physically
weak. This will distract from your message and you never want to distract from your
message.
When you present with high energy, your audience feels it. They become more engaged
and that will give you more energy. The energy builds and builds and everyone benefits
from it.
There are many things which can distract from your message. You need to consider
carefully what could be distracting and ensure you eliminate it. For example, if you leave
an instant messaging system (like Skype, etc.) running, then someone might call during
your presentation, or your audience might simply see little pop-up notifications that
Be rested
The same advice for exams applies to presentation. You should prepare well but you
should also make sure that the night before your presentation you get plenty of good
quality sleep. The gain you can get from the extra preparation the night before will be
less than the gain from a good night’s sleep.
Have fun
Remember that in life enjoyment is so very important. Try not to be stressed by being
required to give a presentation. When you want to enjoy something stressful, try to find
the good or fun part of it and just focus on that part.
Have you always wanted to be an actor? If so, consider this an acting role. Do you like to
help others to understand? Consider this an opportunity to do that. Just because you
have to do it does not mean it cannot be fun. Find the fun.
The more fun you have presenting, the more your audience will enjoy it, the more they
will pay attention, and the better the experience will be for everyone involved. If you
feel it is torture to give a presentation, your audience will feel like they are being
tortured watching you.
Final thoughts
Presentations can be stressful but, if you try, you should be able to find the fun in them.
The keys to presenting well are preparing well and having confidence. Confidence comes
from experience so practice often.
You should also be thinking about your future. What will you do? After spending years
doing the same thing every day, now you will likely leave school and go to work.
Different cultures are quite different about the life-style of a university student. In some
cultures, students are expected to study only and they do not start their first job until
they have received their bachelor degree. In other cultures, students regularly work
while they attend university. Each path has its own benefits.
This section will discuss issues about continuing on to graduate school and how to get
good letters of recommendation for school or for work.
In order to answer that question, even to yourself, you need to decide. There are many
factors which go into this decision including:
If you do not have the grades or the teachers are not impressed enough to write good
letters of recommendations for you, then you will need to depend on your own finances.
There are often options of loans from banks or family members and even working to pay
for your tuition and living expenses. If you did well during your undergraduate studies
you might be able to teach during your graduate studies.
There are two main degrees students get from graduate school, master degrees and PhD
degrees. You should be familiar with each of them.
Master degree
A master degree is a bit different from a bachelor degree. You can (and many do) think
of it as a “super-bachelor” degree. That is, a master degree involves attending classes
(but there is much less class time and much more independent study) and producing
assignments (with more independent research from you). When you have graduated
with a master degree, the school is saying “This person has mastered this topic of
study.”
PhD degree
Many people think of a PhD as a “super-master” degree but in reality a PhD (doctor of
philosophy) is quite different from a master degree in almost every way. A PhD, also
called a doctorate, is about learning how to research. When you study a PhD you may
take classes and you may not (depending on the program and the entry requirements). If
you do take classes they will be mainly at the master level and will also guide you on
how to do proper academic research.
A PhD is about picking one very narrow area of interest and focusing on that doing
extensive research (primary and secondary) and creating a valuable contribution to that
field of study.
While a master can be fairly broad (covering business, international finance, etc.) a PhD
is going to be very narrow (what style of leadership will cause Swiss employees to
maximize performance in the non-profit sector). When you receive your PhD, the school
is saying, “This person knows how to research.”
Who hires someone with a PhD? Any organization which focuses on research. This
includes research-focused universities, think tanks, and companies where research and
development is important (for example, technology or pharmaceutical companies).
Final thoughts
The decision of whether and where to attend graduate school is a huge decision. Before
making that decision, especially if you want to pursue a PhD, I recommend researching
very carefully and discussing it with everyone you can. It is a serious financial
commitment and will consume a lot of your time so make sure you choose wisely.
When someone recommends you, they are putting their reputation on the line for you.
That is, if you succeed, you make the writer look good. If you fail (for example, get bad
grades, drop out, etc.) then you make the writer look bad. If the writer looks bad, their
future letters will be ignored because they have shown that their opinion of students is
not reliable.
Think about it from the schools perspective. If the school knows the student saw and
controlled the letter, then it is reasonable that if they received several letters and they
are only providing the most positive letters (“cherry picking”). This means the school is
not getting an honest opinion about the student. Because of this, if the student delivers
the letter then the school will not consider the letter much. However, if the school
receives the letter directly from the teacher, then it is likely the school will consider the
letter much more because the student was not in a position to intercept the letter.
Another issue is that the school will think about how free the teacher felt when writing
the letter. If you are a teacher and you know your student will read the letter, are you
going to write something very negative about the student? Most likely, you will write a
very general letter like “The student was a good student.” However, the school wants
the details and if the teacher is not free from the judgment of the student then the
letter will not be as reliable.
For these reasons, you should always prefer that the person recommending you will
send the recommendation letter directly to the school.
Should I ask the teacher I liked best or that gave me the highest grade?
You should ask the teacher with the most respect in the field of study and who knows
you the best. If you did not make an impression on the teacher, they are unlikely to
write a letter for you because they do not know you well enough. If you sat in the back
of the class and did not engage in class discussion much, then the teacher might not
know you well enough to recommend you for anything.
Just because a teacher gave you a good grade does not mean that they would
recommend you for every graduate program in the world. The teacher knows they put
their reputation on the line for you and, therefore, they normally only write letters of
recommendation for students they believe will be successful. So, pick the teacher who
believes in you the most.
To support your teacher in writing the best possible letter of recommendation for you,
you should provide all of the key details of what it takes to be successful in the program
you want to enter (this takes research on your part) and identify exactly what you have
done that shows you have what it takes to be successful. You want to give this evidence
to the teacher. Now, this must be evidence the teacher can confirm. If you say “I created
a new measurement process in my Management module” but you are giving this to a
teacher who did not teach you that subject, then it will not help because that teacher
cannot speak about that experience. At that point, you should request a letter from the
teacher who taught you the Management module as that teacher can speak about that
experience.
Final thoughts
When you need a letter of recommendation, you want to get one from the most
qualified teacher you can. However, this will only be possible if you have made a strong,
positive impression on that teacher. If you have been shy and quiet and have not
participated much in class, and your assignments have not been impressive, then it is
more difficult to convince a teacher to risk their reputation by recommending you.
However, if you provide good quality evidence you will improve your chances of getting
a strong letter to help you get what you want.
University lecturers and professors will often focus on the content of the module they
are teaching. If you are studying a module about quality management, the lecturer has
so much to cover about the topic that it is difficult for them to also cover how to write a
proper research report. Your teachers generally believe that you enter their class with
the ability to produce assignments and that they only need to teach you the course
material. For this reason, it is generally up to you to learn how to improve yourself,
especially with regards to what will determine your grade.
Your teachers are there to help you. You should always feel comfortable asking your
teachers for help. It is unreasonable for you to ask your teacher to do your work for you
but you should certainly be clear in knowing what is expected from you. Your teachers
are usually available for consultation hours where you can meet with them one-on-one.
If you find the lessons in class are unclear, you should take advantage of this
consultation time to improve your understanding.
Above all else, you must read. Teachers will tell you constantly to read more. If you want
to know more, read more. If you are unwilling to invest the time in reading, then you are
unwilling to learn. At that point, university might not be the place for you. University is
not like first grade. You are expected to read extensively here. You are expected to read
at least 1.5 hours outside of class for every hour you study in class. If you want higher
scores on your assignments then you should increase the amount you read.
You should always be professional. Being professional means being serious about what
you do. To be serious in your studies mean to do the work expected of you. If you are
unwilling or unable to be professional, you are likely to get lower grades. However, if
you are willing to start making the changes necessary to be professional, your teachers
will help you, your classmates will help you, and everyone else will be more likely to help
you. In the end, you must ask yourself, what do you want from your time at university?