Using Videos in The Teaching of Listening
Using Videos in The Teaching of Listening
Abstract; This research aims to investigate the impact of using videos as audio-visual aids
for teaching listening for ESL. It was conducted from March 15, 2018 up to May 28, 2018. The
population of this study was the first semester of University of Nahdlatul Ulama NTB, and from
this population, two classes were selected as the sample. This research employed true experimental
research method with two groups, an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG). The EG
was taught by using authentic video, while the CG used audio Compact Disc (CD) as the teaching
aid most often used by ESL teachers in teaching listening. In collecting the data, the writer used
tests as the instrument, and in analyzing the data collected, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
computer software was employed. The mean score of the results from the post-tests from the EG at
75 was higher than that of the control group at 64. Moreover, the t-test for the EG was higher than
that for the CG (11.51>4.06) which meant that the improvement in the EG was significantly higher
than the listening achievements of the CG. The EG students taught by using authentic video
achieved higher results in listening than the CG ones taught by audio compact disc (CD). As a
result, the alternative hypothesis was accepted and null hypothesis was rejected which meant that
there was a significant improvement in terms of listening achievements after the use of authentic
videos treatment.
Many experts (such as Harmer, 2007; write for subtitles and then they compare
Cakir, 2006; Kusumarasdyati, 2006) have theirs with what actually appears. To awake
suggested a lot of techniques to use video in students‘ curiosity, Harmer (2007: 306-308)
teaching listening. Some of the suggested provides five viewing techniques namely:
techniques are similar to one another. This Fast forward, Silent viewing (for language
paper will only discuss several of them. To and music), Freeze frame, and Partial viewing
promote engagement and expectations in (further discussion on these techniques is
listening, Harmer (2007: 309-310) suggests provided in the subsequent discussion since
several listening routines/techniques, namely most of them are of similar nature).
(a) pictureless listening (language):The Furthermore, Cakir (2006) provides some
teacher covers the screen and turns the practical techniques for audiovisual material,
monitor away from the students or turns the especially video in classroom such as (a)
brightness control right down. The students active viewing: Before starting the
then listen to a dialogue and have to guess presentation the teacher writes some key
such things as where it is taking place and questions on the board about the presentation
who the speakers are(e.g. age, appearance); so that the students get an overview of the
(b) Pictureless listening (music):It is used content of it. After viewing the questions the
where an excerpt has a prominent music tract. students answer the questions orally, or the
Students can listen to it and then say – based students may take notes while viewing. For
on the mood it appears to convey – what kind more detailed comprehension students are
of scene they think it accompanies and where provided a cue sheet or viewing guides and let
it is taking place; (c) Pictureless listening them watch and listen for specific details or
(sound effects):In a scene without dialogue specific features of language; (b) Freeze
students can listen to the sound effects to framing and prediction: Teacher freezes the
guess what is happening(e.g they might hear picture when he or she wants to teach words
the lighting of a gas stove, eggs being broken and expressions regarding mood and
and fried) and then tell the story they think emotions, to ask questions about a particular
they just have heard; (d) Picture or speech: scene, or to call students‘ attention to some
the class i divided in two so that half of the points. By freezing the scene the students can
class faces the screen and the half faces away. be asked what is going to happen next. So
Students who can see the screen have to they speculate on what will happen in the next
describe what is happening to the students act; (c) Silent viewing: the video segment is
who cannot. This forces them into immediate played with the sound off using only the
fluency while the non-watching students picture and then students have to guess what
struggle to understand what is going on, and is happening and what the characters might be
is an effective way of mixing reception and saying or ask students what has happened up
production in spoken English. Halfway to that point. Finally, video segment is
through an excerpt, the students can change replayed with the sound on so that learners
around; and (e) Subtitles: The teacher can can compare their impressions with what
provide subtitles for the film extract being actually happens in the video; (d) Sound on
shown, or turn down the sound while and vision off activity: play a section of a
watching the film extract with subtitles. Then, video unit and remove the visual element
especially with the subtitles in the students‘ from the presentation by obscuring the picture
L1 language, the teacher stops the film every so that students can hear only the dialogue but
time a subtitle appears and asks the students unable to see the action. Through this activity
to say what they think the characters are the students predict or reconstruct what has
saying in English. When using DVDs with the happened visually depending only what they
option of turning off the subtitles, the teacher hear; (e) Repetition and role-play: When
can ask the students to say what they would there are some difficult language points in the
The objective of the independent t- of the EG and Cg before the treatment. The
test was to find out if there was any results from the T-test of the pre-tests are set
significant difference in the listening abilities out in the table that follows:
Table 3. T-Test Results from the Pre-Tests of Both the EG and the CG
Levene‘s test for T-test for Equality of Means
equality of
Variances
F Sig T df Sig. Mean Std. Error
(2- Diff Difference
Pretest: tld)
Equal 0.04 0.84 0.49 66 0.63 1.76 3.61
variance
assumed
Equal 0.49 57 0.63 1.76 3.61
variance
not
assumed
The table above shows that tobtain of the pre- accepted, so there was no significance
tests from both the EG and the CG was 0.49. difference in listening ability between the
The ttable for df=66 at the level of students in the EG and the CG before the
significance of 5% ( = 0.05) is 2.00. Since treatment.
tobtain<ttable that is 0.49 <2.00, so H0 was
From these tables, it can be seen that A paired test is applied to determine
tobtain from the post-tests of both the EG and the the differences of the students‘ achievement
CG was 3.76. The ttable for df=66 at the level of both in experimental and in control group
significance 5% ( = 0.05) is 2.00. The result before and after giving the treatment. It aims
shows that tobtain>ttable that is 3.76 > 2.00, so H0 is
to evaluate the result of dependent-test in
rejected. This means that the EG students who
experimental group and in the control group.
were taught using authentic videos performed
significantly better than the CG students who The dependent t-test is obtained by pairing
were taught using audio materials only. the result of pre-test and post-test score in
C. The Dependent T-Test (Paired T- each class. The data was calculated by using
Test Analysis) SPSS procedure that can be seen in the
following table.
Table 5. T-Test Result from the Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores from the EG
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tld)
Mean Std. Std. Error
Dev Mean
Pair 1 Post-test Control 25.46 12.11 2.21 11.51 34 0.00
- pre-test control
From the table, it can be seen that the df=34 at the level of significance 5% ( =
t-test of the EG was 11.51. The t-table for 0.05) was 2.04.
Table 6. T-Test Results from the Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores from the CG
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tld)
Mean Std. Std. Error
Dev Mean
Pair 1 Post-test Control 10.60 14.28 2.60 4.06 34 0.00
- pre-test control
According to the data from the tables, 0.05) is 2.04. The result confirms that
the t-test of the EG was 11.51 and the t- tobtain>ttablefor both groups was 11.51
test of the CG was 4.06. The ttable for > 2.04 for the EG and 4.06 >2.04 for the
df=34 at the level of significance 5% ( = CG. This shows that both groups
REFERENCES www2.hawaii.edu/~htnguyen/CALLind
Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with ex.html.
video clips: TV, movies,
YouTube, and mtvU in the Kusumarasdyati. (2006). Subtitled movie
college classroom. International DVDs in Foreign Language Classess.
Journal of Technology in Retrieved on 15 October 2013 from
Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1– http: aare.edu.au/06pap/kus06105.pdf
21.
McKinnon. (n.d.).Teaching technologies:
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: teaching English using video. Retrieved
an interactive approaches to language on 15 October 2012
pedagogy (2nd edition). New York: http://www.onestopenglish.com/support
Longman. /methodology/teaching-
technologies/teaching-technologies-
_______ (2000).Principles of language teaching-english-using-
learning and teaching (4th edition). New video/146527.article
York: Longman.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching
Cahir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio- methodology: a textbook for teachers.
visual material in foreign language New York: Prentice-Hall.
teaching classroom. The Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology – _________. (2002). Listening in language
TOJET Vol. 5 No. 4 learning. In Richards, J.C., &
Renandya, W.A. (Eds.), Methodology in
Cahyono, B.Y. & Widiati, U. (2009). The Language teaching: An Anthology of
teaching of efl listening in the Current Practice (pp. 238-241).
Indonesian context: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University
TEFLIN Journal, Volume 20, Number Press.
2, August 2009
Rahmatian, R.&Armium, N. (2011). The
Field, J. (2009). Listening in the language effectiveness of audio and video
classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge documents indeveloping listening
University Press. comprehension in a foreign
language.International Journal of
Flowerdew, J. & Miller, L. (2005). Second English Linguistics.Vol. 1 No. 1.
language listening: theory and practice.
Cambridge: CUP Richards, J.C., & Renandya, W.A. (2002).
Methodology in Language teaching: An
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of english Anthology of Current Practice.
language teaching. (4th edition). Essex: Cambridge: Cambridge University
Pearson Education Press.