Impact of Borrower Characteristic On Loan Repayment in Tanzania
Impact of Borrower Characteristic On Loan Repayment in Tanzania
1.0 Introduction
This chapter presents the background of the study, problem statement, research
objectives, significance of the study, and scope of the study as well as organization of
the study.
The world today has realized potentiality of financial institutions toward poverty
alleviation and firsthand knowledge of the needs and interest of the poor (Quinones and
Remenyi 2014). In developing countries Microfinance institutions (MFIs) become the
main solution for improve wellbeing of the poor in rural and urban areas population
because they provide affordable loans and saving services to small business, farmers and
traders which were excluded from mainstream traditional banks due to lack of
collaterals, low capital and poor repaying capacity (Alhassan, Hoedoafia et al. 2016).
Since MFIs have viable policy options for alleviating poverty among the poor in the
rural and urban centers, therefore are in line with “Millennium development goals
agenda” which seeks to reduce poverty by 50% by the year 2015 (Gebreab 2016).
Although, the growth and sustainability of MFIs depend on the repayment rate of the
loan borrowers. The higher loan repayment among borrowers tend to increase volume of
credits, lower interest rate, and processing costs and consequently increase patronage of
loans. Also reduces subsidy dependence of the credit institutions to help them reach a
better sustainability level thus serves as a positive signal for increasing the volume of
credit availability to various sectors of the economy (Acquah and Addo 2011)
Different studies in relation to loan default particular in developing countries show the
existence of high level of loan default among borrowers. The findings of Makorere
1
(2014) in Tanzania, Ochung (2013) in kenya, Acquah and Addo (2011) in Ghana, ,
Okorie (2016) in Ngeria, and Roslan and Hakim (2019) in Malaysia have similar views
that loan default is common problem which weak performances or resulting into
collapse of many MFIs in developing countries. (Acquah and Addo 2011, Ochung 2013,
Makorere 2014).
However, most of prior researcher’s findings show that borrower characteristic is among
of loan default causes. Borrower characteristic includes all attribute or capacity
borrowers shown in order to be acceptable for loan easily (Al-shami, Razali et al. 2018).
Researchers viewed differently constituents of borrower characteristics. Typically
include demographic characteristics (age, gender, education, marital status, experience,
training and number of times an applicant has ever borrowed a loan from MFIs.
Nanayakkara and Stewart (2015) findings in Sri Lanka revealed that loan cycle, gender
and age of the borrower influence loan repayment among borrowers. While findings of
Pasha and Negese (2014) in Ethiopia revealed that, borrower with high education level
tend to repay loan on time with less default compare to non-educated borrowers. The
study of Awunyo (2012) in Nigeria revealed that, the probability of a loan repayment
was higher for males than the females, Contrary, Faizal 201 (2017) in Malaysia argue
that default is higher for male than female. Empirical study of Ifeanyi et al. (2014)
findings in Nigeria revealed that, younger farmers were likely to repay credit than older.
While Eze and Ibekwe (2017) findings in Southeast Nigeria, show that, amount of loan
received, age of beneficiary, household size, and years of formal education and
occupation as important predictors of loan repayment under the system (Awunyo-Vitor
2012, Nanayakkara and Stewart 2015, Faizal 2017).
Generally; variables that comprise of borrower’s characteristics are selected based on the
interest of researchers. Both borrowers’ demographic characteristics, borrowers’
business characteristics and borrowers’ economic characteristics affect loan repayment.
2
This study focuses on these variables because can be of usefully by MFIs in analyses
borrower before provisional of loan.
Despite the looming evidence of high loan delinquency rate and adverse effects resulting
from delinquencies, there are few or no empirical studies have done in Tanzania context
focus on assess effect of borrowers’ characteristics on loan repayment specifically on
examine how borrower’s demographic, business and economic characteristic affect loan
repayment behaviour of MFIs borrowers. Thus, this study is of paramount important as
it aimed on bridging the gap of knowledge and raise fresh perspective among scholars.
Despite the looming evidence of high loan delinquency rate and adverse effects resulting
from delinquencies, there are few or no empirical studies have done in Tanzania context
focus on assess effect of borrowers’ characteristics on loan repayment specifically on
examine how borrowers demographic, business and economic characteristic affect loan
repayment behaviour of MFIs borrowers. Thus, this study is of paramount important as
it aimed on bridging the gap of knowledge and raise fresh perspective among scholars.
The study main focus on assess the effects of borrowers’ characteristics on loan
repayment in Tanzania MFIs
4
ii. To examine influence of business characteristics on loan repayment at CRDB
bank
iii. To explore the extent at which borrowers’ economic characteristics affect
loan repayment at CRDB bank
5
This study focuses on assessing effects of borrowers’ characteristics on loan repayment
in financial institutions in Tanzania. There are so many financial institutions in banking
sector that are engaged in loan provision, however, the study is restricted to CRDB bank
head office in Dar es Salaam. In addition to that, the study will be confined to variables
namely borrowers’ demographic characteristics, borrowers’ business characteristics and
borrowers’ economic characteristics.
6
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
Chapter two cover conceptualization and definition of key terms, theoretical literature
reviews, empirical literature reviews and conceptual frame work. The researcher visits
different book, journals and other previous researcher which relate to the study objective
for increasing understand to the topic under investigation.
The following are the meaning of the study variables used in this study. The definitions
of variables used in this study provides insight that will help in generalization of the
conclusions and discussion of findings.
8
All these together resulting into behavior intension. The further emphasis on absolute
relationship between behavioral intention and actual behavior, but still intention can be
employed to measure the behavior of a person in the theory of planned behavior
relatively (Cloutier and Roy 2020). The theory is directly relating to this study as it
considers behavioral beliefs normative beliefs and control beliefs as borrowers’
behavior. It further argues that loan repayment is the function of borrower behavior,
financial institution, business character and regulation and policy guide financial
institution (Dolan, Elliott et al. 2012).
The policy further holds that credit investigation and financial position analysis of
borrower is the task of all financial institution before provisional of loan to applicant. If
applicant does not have required qualification on loan shall be granted(Hassan, Ilyas et
al. 2014). It also explained by Muganyizi (2015) that sound and realistic asset own by
borrower should be submitted by loan applicant which is equal value to the loan applied
(Mrisho 2015).
9
Unsecured credit shall not be granted unless unanimously approved by all its directors
and notified in advance to the financial institution (Barasinska and Schäfer
2014).Borrower also required to explain the purpose of loan. It approval that the loan
was not used as predetermined objective, is the task of the financial institution to
terminate the disbursement of loan and demand immediate repayment until the borrower
provide satisfied reason for diversification of loan provided to other purpose (Ahamad
2016).
(Alnawah, Huimin et al. (2018) identify the factors affecting repayment performance in
Microfinance banks in Yemen and the data analyzed using binary logistic model. Their
major findings suggest that, the borrowers of large amounts default over the borrowers
of small amounts and older borrowers are more defaulted. Also, compared to public
10
sector employees, private sector employee borrowers are defaulted more in the study
(Alnawah, Huimin et al. 2018).
Mokhtar, Nartea et al. (2012) in Malaysia found that older borrowers would be more
responsible in repaying their loans than younger borrowers. Other scholar explains that
borrowers in old age group might have higher financial commitments to their family and
business expenses. Thus, with higher financial obligations, they could have difficulty in
repaying their loans (Mokhtar, Nartea et al. 2012).
Kibrom (2010) investigate effect of borrower and loan characteristic on loan repayment
in Ethiopia development bank. Data was collected from 100 respondents through survey
to bank branch in North Region. The study findings revealed that educational level of
the borrowers, repayment period of the loan, availability of other source of income,
sector, purpose of the loan and type of labor determine successful loan repayment
performance of the borrowers positively and significantly. Other variables such as,
gender and household size have positive sign, but are not statistically significant.
(Kibrom 2010).
11
Studies conducted by Acquah and Addo (2011) and Onyeagocha, Chidebelu et al.
(2012), at different environment of Ghana and Nigeria respectively found that loan
repayment increased with years of education. They explained their finding that
entrepreneurs with higher educational level tend to have more knowledge and skills in
such areas of basic mathematics and accounting which enables them to avoid losses
emanating from poor calculations (Acquah and Addo 2011, Onyeagocha, Chidebelu et
al. 2012)
Bhatt and Tang (2002) investigate determinant of loan repayment among Microcredit in
USA. The findings of the study show that, education level of borrowers have impact on
loan repayment. It further revealed that borrowers with high education level tend to pay
loan than borrowers with low education. This finding is in line with Pasha and Negese
(2014) findings in Ethiopia which revealed that education level of borrowers has
positively and significantly influencing loan repayment. The borrowers with high
education level tend to pay loan on time compare with those with low education level.
While Tanga (2011) findings revealed that education level is directly relate to the loan
repayment practice. Higher educated borrowers tend to pay on time and default level is
low compare to low educated borrowers. (Bhatt and Tang 2002, Ssekiziyivu, Bananuka
et al. 2018).
12
Nawai and Shariff (2012) determine factors affecting repayment performance in
Malaysia MFIs. The study was used multinomial logit regression model in which survey
of 309 respondents was done to obtain data. The study findings indicated that
demographic factors like gender, age, religious education level, distance to lender office
have impact on loan repayment. It also revealed that absence of strong measures by
MFIs resulting into loan delay. Misuse of loans also contribute loan default it was also
observed (Nawai and Shariff 2012)
Business experience also was observed to be one of the factor that influence loan
repayment behaviors of borrowers. The findings of Wongnaa and Vitor (2013) revealed
that borrowers with high experience in farming business activities tend to repay loans
than those with low experiences farmers. The findings of Onyeagocha, Chidebelu and
Okorji (2012) also show the existence of positive relationship between business
experience and loan repayment rate. That is higher experience in business resulting into
high loan repayment. (Kibrom 2010).
Okurut and Kinyondo, (2009) findings revealed that experience in business activities is
positive related to loan repayment practice. Entrepreneurs with experience in business
expected to have more stable financial flow, reliable sales and high business skills which
will enable to risk which resulting into losses (Ndiege, Mataba et al. 2016).
13
Reta (2011) in Ethiopia, explore the determinants of loan Repayment Performance. The
findings of the study revealed that, borrowers with existing business tend to repay loan
compared to new business, most of non-defaulters were borrowing for the purpose of
expanding existing business. Similar result was found by Onyeagocha, Chidebelu et al.
2012) that business existed for at least one year on the owner’s equity, the loan from
microfinance should be a lower risk than if the business is a start-up, because businesses
are most likely to fail within the first year of operation. This apparently indicates that
borrowing for the purpose of running the existing business is relatively better loan
repayment performance (Reta 2011, Onyeagocha, Chidebelu et al. 2012)
Saparila (2001) explore factors contributing to credit repayment behavior among the
clients of MFIs in East Java-Indonesia. The study was used descriptive and inferential
statistic to investigate relationship of association between the probability of respondents’
loan repayment performance and the borrower characteristics. The main variables
include was lender borrower’s characteristic. The study findings revealed that gender,
marital status, business experience and distance have strong relationship with loan
repayment practice. Similarly the findings of Makorere (2014) have similar views that
farmers with experience in farming activities tend to have good management and yield
which can influence their loan repayment practice (Wongnaa and Awunyo-Vitor 2013,
Makorere 2014).
Mamun, Wahab, Malar and Mariapun, (2011) conduct a study in Malaysia focus on
determine loan repayment problem among borrowers. The study used a structure
equation model in which it revealed that, there is negative linear relationship between
repayment problem with uses of loan in income generating activities, household income,
14
number of gainfully employed members, and number of sources of income. Ozdemir
and Boran (2004) determined factors influencing the credit default risk of borrower of
one of the biggest banks in Turkey in individual lending scheme. The results found that
female borrower, married clients, and older borrower likely to pay their installment on
time. The study also showed that income had a negative and statistically significant
effect on client’s payback performance. It also detected that the bigger the loan the better
the repayment (Mokhtar, Nartea et al. 2012).
Ifeanyi et al. Niger Determinants of Loan Descriptive The study findings revealed
Repayment Behaviour of statistics,
(2014) ia that age is negative relate with
Smallholder Cooperative correlation,
Farmers in Yewa North Local and loan repayment. Younger
Government Area of Ogun State, multivariate farmers were more likely to
Nigeria regression
analytical repay credit than older ones
techniques
Alnawah, et Yeme Analysis of factors affecting loan binary logistic findings suggest that, the
al (2018) n repayment performance in model. borrowers of large amounts
Yemen Microfinance default over the borrowers of
small amounts and older
borrowers are more defaulted.
Also, compared to public
sector employees, private
sector employee borrwers are
defaulted more in the study
Suraya et al. Mala Determinants of Microcredit The findings of the study
(2011) ysia Loans Repayment Problem logistic revealed that older borrowers
Among Microfinance would be more responsible in
15
Borrowers in Malaysia regression repaying their loans than
younger borrowers.
model,
Awunyo- Ghan determinants of loan repayment Probit model The study findings show that
partly
Vitor (2012) a default among farmers in Ghana male are more energetic, hard
workers hence their
possibility of hard work may
raise their productivity and
thus increase the non-
defaulting. It further show
that male borrowers had
experience in accessing
microcredit than their female
counterparts
Roslan and Mala Determinants of microcredit Probit and Results showed that male
Karim (2009) ysia repayment in Malaysia: The case logit models have high probability of
of Agro bank. default than female borrowers
Kibrom Ethio Effect of borrower and loan Probit model Outcome revealed that
(2010) pia characteristic on loan repayment educational level of the
borrowers, repayment period
in Ethiopia development bank of the loan, availability of
other source of income,
sector, purpose of the loan
and type of labor determine
successful loan repayment
performance of the borrowers
positively and significantly.
Bhatt and USA Determinant of loan repayment logistic The findings of the study
Tang (2011) among Microcredit in USA regression show that, education level of
Value in Manufacturing firms model borrowers have impact on
loan repayment. Borrowers
with high education level tend
16
to pay loan than borrowers
with low education
Pasha and Ethio Performance of loan Descriptive findings revealed that
Negese pia repayment determinants in statistics and education level of borrowers
(2014) Ethiopian microfinance – An tobit has positively and
analysis. regression significantly
influencing loan repayment.
The borrowers with high
education level tend to pay
loan on time compare with
those with low education level
Nawai and Mala Factors affecting repayment Multinomial The study findings indicated
that demographic factors like
Shariff ysia performance in Malaysia MFIs logit
gender, age, religious
(2012) regression education level, distance to
model lender office have impact on
loan repayment.
Munene Keny Factors influencing loan descriptive The findings of the study
(2013) a repayment in Kenya MFIs and inferential found that the number of
statistic employees in a business was a
factor which was negatively
correlated to loan repayment
performance
Wongnaa Ghan Factors affecting loan repayment multinomial The outcomes pointed out that
and Vitor a performance among yam farmers logit borrowers with high
2013) in the Sene district, Ghana regression experience in farming
model business activities tend to
repay loans than those with
low experiences farmers
Reta (2011) Ethio Exploration of the determinants structure The findings of the study
pia of loan Repayment Performance equation revealed that, borrowers with
17
model existing business tend to
repay loan compared to new
business, most of non-
defaulters were borrowing for
the purpose of expanding
existing business.
Norell (2011) How to reduce arrears in descriptive The study findings revealed
microfinance institutions’, and inferential that business existed for at
least one year on the owner’s
journal of microfinance. statistic equity, the loan from
microfinance should be a
lower risk than if the business
is a start-up, because
businesses are most likely to
fail within the first year of
operation.
AlMamun, Mala Investigation of loan repayment structure The study findings revealed
Wahab, ysia problem among borrowers in equation that, there is negative linear
Malar and Malaysia model relationship between
Mariapun, repayment problem with uses
(2011) of loan in income generating
activities, household income,
number of gainfully employed
members, and number of
sources of income
18
Borrowers Demographic characteristic
Age
Gender
Education level
Social
Location of the business
Economic Characteristic
Income
Interest rate
CHAPTER THREE
3. 0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
19
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the methodology in which the study will use to collect data from
respondents. It includes research design, study area, study population, sample size and
sampling techniques, data source and types, validity, and reliability and data
management and analysis.
20
Table 3.1: The distribution of sample size
(%)
CRDB staff 69 42.9
Loan beneficiaries 92 57.1
Total 161 100
Source; Researcher, (2021).
The sample size of loan beneficiaries is determined by Slovin’s (1960) formula with a
confidence level of 91% and margin of error of 9% (1-0.09), the formula is expressed as
hereunder;
n=N÷ (1+Ne2)
= 91.9305
Therefore, the sample size for the loan beneficiaries is 92 respondents. Meanwhile the
sample size of CRDB staff is justified by Mugenda (2010) concept which states that, a
sample size of 10% - 30% of the total population is adequate for a study in research
(Mugenda and Mugenda 2010). From that point of view, 30% of the total population
21
(230) of the CRDB staff has been taken which is 69 respondents. Therefore, the total
sample size for this study will be 161 respondents.
22
3.6 Data collection method and instrument
A study will collect both primary and secondary data. Primary data are those data which
have been collected for the first time such as questionnaire and interview while
secondary data are those data that has been collected by someone else and exist
somewhere (Alshenqeeti 2014). The primary data will be collected by using interviews
and questionnaires
The interview will be conducted in Kiswahili language for purpose of solving language
problem to bank borrowers particular those which does not familiarity with English
language. Kitzinger 1995 notes that “language barrier and the role of the research
assistant are in focus when evaluating the relevance of the data collection”. Choosing
informants who were all fluent in English would have severely restricted the choice of
informants, so Swahili language will used for purpose of getting response from the bank
borrower(Kitzinger 1995).
3.7.1Validity
3.7.2 Reliability
A number of measures used to ensure study reliability. Lysons (1999) define reliability
as a measure of the ability of a product to function successful when required for the
period required under specified condition. Reliability in current study will achieved
through recording of all interviews to present more reliable evidence and avoid any bias
which might happen if the researcher attempted to remember the conversation (Potter
and Levine‐Donnerstein 1999)
Since a study will both qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques, the descriptive
statistical techniques, mainly frequencies and percentages will used in analysis of data .
Also researcher will also use SPSS and then transferred to Microsoft Excel to create
24
some charts and diagrams. With the use of these package the researcher will able to
analyze the information from the findings quickly. The analysis will guided by research
objectives and research questions.
REFERENCES
Ajzen, I. (2011). "Design and evaluation guided by the theory of planned behavior." Soc psychol
Eval, Guilford Publications: 74-100.
25
Ajzen, I. (2020). "The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions." Human
Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2(4): 314-324.
Al-shami, S. S. A., et al. (2018). "The effect of microcredit on women empowerment in welfare
and decisions making in Malaysia." Social Indicators Research 137(3): 1073-1090.
Alhassan, E. A., et al. (2016). "The Effects of Microcredit on Profitability and the Challenges of
Women Owned SMEs: Evidence from Northern Ghana." Journal of Entrepreneurship
and Business Innovation 3(1).
Barasinska, N. and D. Schäfer (2014). "Is crowdfunding different? Evidence on the relation
between gender and funding success from a German peer-to-peer lending platform."
German Economic Review 15(4): 436-452.
Chen, H., et al. (2010). "Association between borrower and lender state ownership and
accounting conservatism." Journal of Accounting Research 48(5): 973-1014.
Cheng, X. and H. Degryse (2010). "The impact of bank and non-bank financial institutions on
local economic growth in China." Journal of Financial Services Research 37(2): 179-
199.
Cloutier, J. and A. Roy (2020). "Consumer Credit Use of Undergraduate, Graduate and
Postgraduate Students: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour." Journal of
Consumer Policy 43(3): 565-592.
26
De la Torre, A., et al. (2017). Innovative Experiences in Access to Finance: Market-Friendly
Roles for the Visible Hand?, The World Bank.
Denscombe, M. (2017). EBOOK: The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research
Projects, McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Dolan, P., et al. (2012). "Influencing financial behavior: From changing minds to changing
contexts." Journal of Behavioral Finance 13(2): 126-142.
Faizal, S. (2017). Malay women’s identity construction and engagement with The Sims Social in
Facebook.
Hassan, H. U., et al. (2014). "Quantitative study of bank-specific and social factors of non
performing loans of Pakistani Banking Sector." International Letters of Social and
Humanistic Sciences 43: 192-213.
Heale, R. and A. Twycross (2015). "Validity and reliability in quantitative studies." Evidence
based nursing 18(3): 66-67.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). "Qualitative research: introducing focus groups." Bmj 311(7000): 299-302.
Mokhtar, S. H., et al. (2012). "Determinants of microcredit loans repayment problem among
microfinance borrowers in Malaysia." International Journal of Business and Social
Research (IJBSR) 2(7): 33-45.
Nayak, B. K. (2010). "Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation." Indian journal of
ophthalmology 58(6): 469.
Ndiege, B. O., et al. (2016). "The link between financial performance and loan repayment
management in Tanzanian SACCOS." African Journal of Business Management 10(4):
89-97.
Ochung, K. O. (2013). Factors affecting loan repayment among customers of commercial banks
in Kenya: A Case of Barclays bank of Kenya, Nairobi County, University of Nairobi.
Ongori, J. K., et al. (2013). "Factors affecting performance of hotels and restaurants in Kenya: A
case of Kisii County."
Quinones, B. and J. Remenyi (2014). Microfinance and poverty alleviation: Case studies from
Asia and the Pacific, Routledge.
28
Reta, F. (2011). "Determinants of loan repayment performance: A case study in the Addis credit
and saving institution, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia." Wageningen University 20: 15.
Rieffel, A. (2003). Restructuring sovereign debt: the case for ad hoc machinery, Brookings
Institution Press.
Saunders, M., et al. (2003). "Research methods forbusiness students." Essex: Prentice Hall:
Financial Times.
Ssekiziyivu, B., et al. (2018). "Borrowers characteristics, credit terms and loan repayment
performance among clients of microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from rural
Uganda."Journal of Economics and International Finance 10(1): 1-10.
`Stewart, N. a. (2015).
Vehovar, V., et al. (2016). "Non-probability sampling." The Sage handbook of survey methods:
329-345.
29