Chapter 3: Casing Design & Selection: By: Mutia Kharunisa
Chapter 3: Casing Design & Selection: By: Mutia Kharunisa
1. FUNCTIONS OF CASING
2. TYPES OF CASING
3. CLASSIFICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED
d. Connections
CSG Short round threads & couplings – no pressure seal at internal pressure,
threaded surfaces get further separated.
LCSG Long round threads & couplings- greater strength & greater joint
efficiency. Reliable, easy & cheap.
BCSG Buttress threads & couplings- nearly 100% joint efficiency. Not 100%
leakoff
XCSG Extreme line threads- integral joint, has box & pin ends. (expensive)
CSG & LCSG also called API 8-Round threads- hv 8 threads per inch
e. Weight
• Weight per unit length in lb/ft
• Nominal Weight: Threaded & coupled casing joint
• Plain-end Weight: Joint of casing without the threads & couplings
f. Grade
• Relates to the tensile strength of the steel from which the casing is made.
TENSION
Under axial tension, pipe body may suffer 3 possible deformations:
1. Elastic- the metallurgical properties of the steel in the pipe body suffer permanent damage &
it regains its original form if the load is withdrawn.
2. Elasto-plastic- the pipe body suffers a permanent deformation which often results in loss of
strength.
3. Plastic
Pipe body strength is the minimal force required to cause permanent deformation of the pipe.
𝐹𝑎 = 𝜎𝑦 𝐴𝑠
Bending force,
𝐹𝑏 = 63 𝑑0 𝑊𝑛 𝜃
BURST PRESSURE
Minimum expected internal pressure at which permanent pipe deformation could take place, if the
pipe is subjected to no external pressure / axial loads.
API BURST RATING:
𝜎𝑦 𝑡
𝑃𝑏𝑟 = 0.875
𝑑0
COMBINED STRESSES
𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
𝜎𝑍 =
𝐴𝑠
𝜎𝑦,𝑒𝑓𝑓 + 𝑃𝑖 𝜎𝑧 𝜎𝑧
= √1 − 0.75( )2 − 0.5( )
𝜎𝑦 𝜎𝑦 𝜎𝑦
• Initial selection of casing depths- based on PP and FP gradients for the well
• Info on PP and FP gradients : from offset well data
𝜎𝑧 𝜎𝑧 24820 2 24820
𝜎𝑦,𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 𝜎𝑦 √1 − 0.75( )2 − 0.5 ( ) = 55000 × √1 − 0.75 ( ) − 0.5 ( )
𝜎𝑦 𝜎𝑦 55000 55000
Here, the axial load decreased the J-55 rating to an equivalent J-38.2 rating
EXAMPLE 2
Given: OD=9 5/8”, Depth=8000ft, MW=12.5ppg, PP=6000psi
Design combination string
2. Compare the required burst and collapse pressure to the given burst and collapse rating
Burst OK
Collapse Fail
Burst OK
Collapse OK
Therefore, we are going to use N-80 with weight 47lb/ft and N-80 with weight 53.5 lb/ft
4. Calculate the weight of below casing (heavier casing) can cause axial load to the lighter pipe.
At 6509ft, we have (8000-6509)ft=1491ft of 53.5lb/ft casing below. The weight of this pipe will
reduce the collapse resistance of 47lb/ft
53.5𝑙𝑏
𝑊= × 1491𝑓𝑡 = 79769𝑙𝑏𝑓
𝑓𝑡
The weight results in axial stress in the 47ft/lb pipe, therefore, the axial stress:
𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 76769
𝜎𝑍 = = = 5877𝑝𝑠𝑖
𝐴𝑠 13.572
The API tables show that the axial stress=5877psi reduces the collapse resistance from 4760 to
somewhere between: 4680psi (with 5000 psi stress) and 4600psi (with 10,000 psi stress).
5. Interpolate between the values from table to show the collapse resistance at 5877 axial stress is:
𝑃𝑐 − 4680 5877 − 5000
=
4600 − 4680 10000 − 5000
𝑃𝑐 = 4658 𝑝𝑠𝑖
Third iteration
The axial load,
W= 53.5 lb/ft x (8000-6369)ft= 87259 lbf