0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views

Effect of Fertigation and Drip Irrigation On Yield and Quality of Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai)

Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai]

Uploaded by

Shailendra Rajan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views

Effect of Fertigation and Drip Irrigation On Yield and Quality of Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai)

Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai]

Uploaded by

Shailendra Rajan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Journal Journal

of Applied
Appl Journal of Applied Horticulture, 22(1): 67-70, 2020 Horticulture
DOI: 10.37855/jah.2020.v22i01.13 ISSN: 0972-1045

Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of


watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai]

S.K. Nisha*, I. Sreelathakumary and S. Vijeth


Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayani 695 522, Kerala, India. *Email:[email protected]

Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate the influence of different levels of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of
watermelon. Fertigation treatments were 75, 100 and 125 % recommended dose of fertilizer (RD). Irrigation treatments were 0.6 and
0.8 evapotranspiration (ET) rates. One control was taken with surface irrigation and conventional soil application of fertilizers. Levels
of fertigation and irrigation exerted significant influence on number of fruits plant-1 and yield plant-1. Total yield was highest at 100
% RD (91.1 t ha-1) compared to 125 % RD (80.13 t ha-1). Fertigation at 100 % RD recorded highest number of fruits which was on
par with 125 % RD. There was increase in number of fruits plant-1 and fruit yield with increase in irrigation level from 0.6 to 0.8 ET.
Fertigation at 100 % RD recorded the highest yield of 8.51 kg plant-1. Fertigation and irrigation levels had no influence on fruit weight.
TSS, lycopene, ascorbic acid and sugar contents did not increase with deficit irrigation of 0.6 ET.
Key words: Citrullus lanatus, watermelon, fertigation, irrigation

Introduction Mineral nutrition is one of the important factors contributing


to watermelon yield. However, the suggested rates varied
Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] is a considerably. Goreta et al. (2005) found that total and marketable
popular fruit of the family Cucurbitaceae, cultivated all over the yields did not increase with nitrogen rates above 115 kg ha-1.
world. In India, it is grown in an area of 1.01 lakh hectare with Increased use of fertilizer led to rise in yield and dry weight
a production of 25.2 lakh tonnes (GOI, 2018). Watermelon is a of watermelon fruits (Hendericks et al., 2007) but stronger
rich source of lycopene and citrulline. It contains more than 91 % infestation of gummy stem blight and downy mildew was
water and therefore, water supply during critical stages of plant observed with increased nitrogen fertigation (Santos et al., 2009).
growth and fruit development is very important. Water availability
for irrigation will be a major constraint for agriculture in coming Generally, in watermelon deficit irrigation (Leskovar et al., 2004)
years. So strategies to reduce water loss are the need of the hour. and various levels of fertilizers supplied through fertigation had
Use of micro irrigation facilities like drip system can play a no influence on fruit quality like lycopene and vitamin C (Andrade
major role towards this end. In drip irrigation, water is delivered Junior et al., 2009; Prabhakar et al., 2013). But Wakindiki and
near the plant root zone in a precise quantity so as to maintain Kirambia (2011) reported decrease in soluble solids with increase
soil moisture content close to field capacity. Drip irrigation also in irrigation. Marketable yield decreased linearly in response to
increases the uptake of plant nutrients and water use efficiency. an increase in water stress (Simsek et al., 2004; Fernandes et
al., 2014).
Fertigation is the process of applying fertilizer along with
irrigation. It allows placement of nutrients directly into root zone In Kerala, watermelon is cultivated only in a very limited
through emitters during critical periods of nutrient requirement. area of 100 ha (GOI, 2018), even though the demand for the
Fertigation allows an accurate and uniform application of nutrients fruit is very high. Being a high value crop, its exploitation on
to the wetted area where most active roots are concentrated. commercial scale can generate handsome income to farmers.
Fertigation can improve nutrient use efficiency by supplying Generally watermelon is cultivated using surface irrigation with
nutrients and water precisely avoiding excess concentrations of soil application of fertilizers. For crops like cucumber, cowpea,
fertilizer in the soil and consequent leaching (Bar-Yosef, 1999). bittergourd, tomato etc. adoption of fertigation is more and often
The nutrient use efficiency of fertigation is about 90 per cent overuse of fertilizers is seen. The effect of irrigation strategies
compared to that of conventional methods, where it is only 40- and interaction with fertigation rates is not well investigated in
60 per cent. Drip fertigation is highly profitable as it saves input, watermelon under sandy clay loam soils of southern Kerala. This
labour and energy to about 54 per cent than that of conventional study was performed to explore the effects of different fertigation
and drip irrigation levels on yield and quality of watermelon.
methods. The application efficiency of water and nutrients is
improved by drip fertigation. At the same time marketable yield
is maintained or improved (Monaghan et al., 2010). Under water
Materials and methods
scarce conditions, fertigation is considered as the most effective The field experiment was conducted at the research field of
tool for managing nutrients and irrigation water. Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayani,
Journal of Applied Horticulture (www.horticultureresearch.net)
68 Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of watermelon

Kerala Agricultural University during 2015-2016. The number of fruits plant-1. Fertigation at 100 % RD recorded highest
site was located at 08o 25`53.7`` N and 76o 59`15.8`` E number (4.13) which was on par with 125 % RD (3.76). Among the
at an altitude of 29 m above mean sea level. Mechanical irrigation treatments, 0.8 ET registered the highest number of fruits
composition and moisture characteristics of the soil plant-1. Fruit weight was not influenced by different treatments. Levels
are provided in Table 1. The treatments were factorial of fertigation and irrigation exerted significant influence on yield
combinations of three fertigation levels (75 %, 100 % and plant-1. Fertigation at 100 % RD recorded the highest yield (8.51 kg
125 % recommended dose (RD) of 70:50:120 NPK ha-1) per plant) followed by 75 % RD (7.55 kg) which was on par with
and two irrigation levels (0.6 and 0.8 evapotranspiration 125 % RD (7.52 kg). Fertigation at 100 % RD significantly increased
(ET) rates) arranged in randomized block design with three number of fruits plant-1, yield plant-1 and yield hectare-1. Nitrogen
replications and control with surface irrigation and normal promotes vegetative growth and P stimulates root development. Better
soil application of fertilizer. The watermelon hybrid Prachi, vegetative growth leads to enhanced chlorophyll content along with
with mini sized fruit, identified as the best watermelon higher stomatal conductance and thereby increased photosynthesis.
hybrid suitable for south Kerala condition (Nisha and Moreover, sufficient availability of K might have encouraged increased
Sreelathakumary, 2017) was used. transport of photosynthates to the sink leading to higher yield (Maluki
Table 1. Physical composition and moisture characteristics of the et al., 2016). Under open condition, fruit weight was not influenced
soil by fertilizer dose. Similar result was reported by Andrade Junior et al.
Particulars Value (2009), where fruit yield was more influenced by number of fruits than
A. Mechanical composition fruit weight. The yield attributes like fruit weight, fruits plant-1 and yield
Coarse sand (%) 16.30 plant-1 were decreased at the highest fertilizer level (125 % RD) tried.
Fine sand (%) 30.50 This might be attributed to early fruit set in lower nodes which resulted
Silt (%) 25.80 in competition between the fruit and vegetative parts during early fruit
Clay (%) 26.10 development. Moreover early formed fruits also recorded reduced fruit
Textural class Sandy clay loam weight (Watanabe, 2014). Increased concentration of soluble fertilizers
B. Soil moisture characteristics increases the osmotic potential of soil solution, causing reduction in
Particle density (g cc-1) 2.30 water uptake by the plant roots (Maluki et al., 2016). The application
Bulk density (g cc-1) 1.40 of fertilizer through drip was found superior to conventional solid
Maximum water holding capacity (%) 23.70 Table 2. Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield of watermelon
Porosity (%) 31.10
Treatments Fruits Fruit weight Yield plant-1 Yield
Field capacity (%) 21.90 plant-1 (kg) (kg) (t ha-1)
Permanent wilting point (%) 9.10
Fertigation
The experimental area was deeply ploughed up to 50 cm 75 %RD 3.59 2.17 7.55 80.41
and weeds and stubbles were removed. Farm yard manure 100 %RD 4.13 2.24 8.51 91.10
@ 25 t ha-1 was applied before last ploughing. Raised 125 %RD 3.76 2.11 7.52 80.13
beds of one meter width and one foot height were taken SE(m)± 0.126 0.097 0.056 2.554
with channels of 50 cm between beds; so that the row to CD at 5 % 0.393 NS 0.715 7.947
row spacing was 1.5 m. Drip lines were laid with a lateral Irrigation level
per bed and drippers with a discharge rate of 2 L hour-1 0.6 ET 3.60 2.06 7.28 77.49
spaced every 60 cm. The beds were covered with silver 0.8 ET 4.06 2.28 8.42 90.25
on black polyethylene mulch of 50 μ thickness. Seedlings SE(m)± 0.101 0.083 0.187 2.085
were raised in protrays using cocopeat and vermicompost CD at 5 % 0.315 NS 0.582 6.489
as media. Twelve days old seedlings at 2-3 true leaf stage Control 3.71 1.51 5.12 52.76
were transplanted to main field at 60 cm spacing. Uniform NS-Non significant
irrigation was given to the seedlings up to one week after
Table 3. Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on quality of watermelon
transplanting. Irrigation scheduling was started from first
Treatments TSS Lycopene Ascorbic Reducing Non
week onwards. Drip irrigation was scheduled daily to meet (ºBrix) (mg 100 g-1) acid sugar reducing
the crop water requirement based on the pan evaporation (mg 100g-1) (%) sugar (%)
data of previous day from Class A open pan evaporimeter Fertigation
near the trial plot. Total irrigation applied was 184.02 mm, 75 %RD 12.62 6.32 3.85 3.07 3.88
239.79 mm and 330.86 mm for 0.6 ET, 0.8 ET and control 100 %RD 13.01 6.37 3.95 3.07 3.91
respectively. Fertigation was done at three days interval 125 %RD 12.53 6.36 4.05 3.09 3.90
using fertigation pump. The data was analysed statistically SE(m)± 0.230 0.006 0.147 0.460 0.018
by applying the techniques of analysis of variance (Panse CD at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS
and Sukhatme, 1985). Irrigation level
0.6 ET 12.81 6.28 3.75 3.06 3.87
0.8 ET 12.62 6.43 4.15 3.10 3.91
Results and discussion SE(m)± 0.189 0.007 0.118 0.039 0.013
The effects of different levels of fertigation and drip irrigation CD at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS
on yield and quality characters are presented in Tables 2 and Control 12.61 6.32 3.80 3.05 3.90
3. There was significant difference among treatments for NS-Non significant

Journal of Applied Horticulture (www.horticultureresearch.net)


Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of watermelon 69

fertilizer application (Choudhari and More, 2002; Sharma et al., References


2011). Fertigation treatments recorded higher values for number
Andrade Junior, S.A., C.R. da Silva, N.S. Dias, B.H.N. Rodrigues and
of fruits plant-1 and fruit weight than conventional soil application V.Q. Ribeiro, 2009. Response of watermelon to nitrogen fertigation.
of fertilizers. Similar observation was also made by Prabhakar Irriga., 14(2): 115-122.
et al. (2013). Bang, H., D.I. Leskovar, D.A. Bender and K. Crosby, 2004. Deficit
irrigation impact on lycopene, soluble solids, firmness and yield of
The highest fruit yield of 8.42 kg per plant was recorded at 0.8 diploid and triploid watermelon in three distinct environments. J.
ET against 7.28 kg with irrigation at 0.6 ET. Proper balance of Hort. Sci. Biotechnol., 79: 885-890.
moisture in plants not only increases the photosynthesis but also Bar-Yosef, B. 1999. Advances in fertigation. Adv. Agron., 65: 1-77.
helps in higher uptake of nutrients to meet accelerated rate of Battilani, A. and D. Solimando, 2006. Yield, quality and nitrogen use
growth and ultimately yield. The drip irrigation levels gave higher efficiency of fertigated watermelon. Acta Hort., 700: 85-90.
yield of watermelon than surface irrigation. The increased yield Choudhari, S.M. and T.A. More, 2002. Fertigation, fertilizer and spacing
requirement of tropical gynoecious cucumber hybrids. Acta Hort.,
under drip irrigation system might have resulted due to excellent 588: 233-240.
soil-water-air relationship with higher oxygen concentration in the Davis, A.R., C.L. Webber, P. Perkins-Veazie and J. Collins, 2006. Impact
root zone, higher uptake of nutrients (Deolankar et al., 2004) and of cultivar and production practices on yield and phytonutrient
continuous maintenance of higher soil moisture content to fulfil content of organically grown watermelon. J. Veg. Sci., 12: 83-91.
the evapotranspirational need of the crop. Leskovar et al. (2003) Deolankar, K.P., N.N. Firake and D.P. Ingale, 2004. Effect of irrigation
methods, forms and levels of NPK on movement and uptake of
reported highest total yield at 1.0 ET (53.9 t ha-1) compared to 0.5
Entisols. J. Maharashtra Agr. Univ., 29(3): 325-327.
ET (26.8 t ha-1). Reduction in number of fruits plant-1 and total
El-Beheidi, M.A., A.A. El-Sherbeing and M.H. El-Sawah, 1990.
yield caused by deficit irrigation are similar to those obtained by Watermelon growth and yield as influenced by nutrition and
Erdem et al. (2001), Bang et al. (2004), Rouphel et al. (2008) irrigation methods in new reclaimed sandy soils. Egyptian J. Hort.,
and Kirnak and Dogan (2009). However, McCann et al. (2007) 17: 447-456.
reported that irrigation levels had no significant effect on yield Erdem, Y., A.N. Yuksel and A.H. Orta, 2001. The effects of deficit
irrigation on watermelon yield, water use and quality characteristics.
of seedless watermelon. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 4: 785-789.
Total soluble solids (TSS) is the most important quality parameter Fernandes, C.N.V., B.M. de Azevedo, J.R.N. Neto, T.V.A.Viana and G.G.
de Sousa, 2014. Irrigation and fertigation frequencies with nitrogen
of watermelon. TSS content was not affected by the fertigation in the watermelon culture. Bragantia, 73(2): 106-112.
and irrigation levels. El-Beheidi et al. (1990) and Gioia et al.
Gioia, F.D., E. Simonne, D. Jarry, M. Dukes, R. Hochmuthand and D.
(2009) reported that total soluble solids was unaffected by Studstill, 2009. Real-time drip-irrigation scheduling of watermelon
fertigation levels in watermelon. Battilani and Solimando (2006) grown with plasticulture. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc., 122:
and Andrade Junior et al. (2009) also reported no significant 212-217.
differences in fruit quality in watermelon with different fertilizer GOI [Government of India], 2018. Horticultural statistics at a glance
2018. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, 458p.
levels supplied through fertigation. However, increased TSS
Goreta, S., S. Perica, G. Dumicic, L. Buca and K. Zanic, 2005. Growth
content with increase in application of P was reported by Maluki and yield of watermelon on polyethylene mulch with different
et al. (2016). Higher TSS was recorded in watermelon receiving spacings and nitrogen rates. HortSci., 40(2): 366-369.
fertigation compared to conventional solid fertilizer application Hendericks, G.S., S. Shukla, K.E. Cushman, T.A. Obreza, F.M. Roka,
(Prabhakar et al., 2013). According to Davis et al. (2006) K.M. Portier, and E.J. McAvoy, 2007. Florida watermelon production
withholding irrigation prior to harvesting increases sugar content affected by water and nutrient management. HortTechnol., 17:
328-335.
and avoid fibrous flesh. Fernandes et al. (2014) also reported
Kirnak, H. and E. Dogan, 2009. Effect of seasonal water stress imposed
significant influence of irrigation frequencies on soluble solids on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grown in semi-arid climatic
content. conditions. Irr. Sci., 27: 155-164.
Leskovar, D.I., H. Bang, K. Kolenda, J.A. Franco and P. Perkins-Veazie,
Fertigation and irrigation treatments had no significant 2003. Deficit irrigation influences yield and lycopene content of
influence on ascorbic acid content, lycopene, reducing and non diploid and triploid watermelon. Acta Hort., 628: 147-151.
reducing sugars. Leskovar et al. (2004) reported that vitamin Leskovar, D.I., H. Bang, K.M. Crosby, N. Maness, J.A. Franco and P.
C and lycopene content was unaffected by deficit irrigation in Perkins-Veazie, 2004. Lycopene, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and
watermelon. Lycopene content in watermelon is related to growth yield components of diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars as
affected by deficit irrigation. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol.,79: 75-81.
conditions, harvest maturity, accession and ploidy level. In
Maluki, M., J. Ogweno and R.M. Gesimba, 2016. Evaluation of nitrogen
contrast to this, drip irrigation with saline ground water improved effects on yield and quality of watermelon grown in coastal regions
quality of watermelon in terms of total sugars and vitamin C of Kenya. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., 9(2): 1-8.
(Tingwu et al., 2003). McCann, I., E. Kee, J. Adkins, E. Ernest and J. Ernest, 2007. Effect of
irrigation rate on yield of drip irrigated seedless watermelon in a
The results of the present study revealed that the yield of humid region. Sci. Hort., 113: 155-161.
watermelon increased under drip irrigation and fertigation Monaghan, J.M., C.R. Rahn, H.W. Hilton and M. Wood, 2010. Improved
than the conventional surface irrigation and soil application of efficiency for high quality field vegetable production using
fertilizer. Deficit irrigation reduced the yield in watermelon, but fertigation. Acta Hort., 852: 145-152.
TSS, lycopene and ascorbic acid contents remained unaffected. Nisha, S.K. and I. Sreelathakumary, 2017. Performance of watermelon
accessions for yield and quality under south Kerala condition. In:
For open precision farming in watermelon, the fertigation level Mainstreaming Biodiversity for Sustainable Development. Kerala
of 70:50:120 NPK ha-1 was found ideal. State Biodiversity Board, Thiruvananthapuram. p. 63-68.
Journal of Applied Horticulture (www.horticultureresearch.net)
70 Effect of fertigation and drip irrigation on yield and quality of watermelon

Panse, V.G. and P.V. Sukhatme, 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Simsek, M., M. Kacira and T. Tonkaz, 2004. The effects of drip irrigation
Workers (4thEd.). Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New regimes on watermelon yield and yield components under semi arid
Delhi, 347p. climatic conditions. Aust. J. Agr. Res., 55(11): 1149-1157.
Prabhakar, M., S.S. Hebbar and A.K. Nair, 2013. Influence of various Tingwu, L., X. Juan, L. Guangyong, M. Jianhua, W. Jianping, L.
sources and levels of fertilizer applied through fertigation on hybrid Zhinzhong and Z. Jianguo, 2003. Effect of drip irrigation with saline
watermelon grown in rabi-summer. J. Hort. Sci., 8(1): 60-64. water on water use efficiency and quality of watermelons. Water
Rouphael, Y., M. Cardarelli and G. Colla, 2008. Yield, mineral Resources Mgt., 17: 395-408.
composition, water relations, and water use efficiency of grafted Watanabe, S. 2014. Fruit productivity of vertically trained watermelon
mini-watermelon plants under deficit irrigation. HortSci., 43(3): (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. &Nakai) plants. JARQ, 48
730-736. (2): 121-131.
Santos, G.R., M.D.C. Neto, H.S.M. de Almeida, L.N. Ramos, R.A. Wakindiki, I.I.C. and R.K. Kirambia, 2011. Supplemental irrigation
Sarmento, S.O. Lima and E.A.L. Erasmo, 2009. Effect of nitrogen effects on yield of two watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars
doses on disease severity and watermelon yield. Hort. Bras., 27: under semiarid climate in Kenya. Afr. J. Agr. Res., 6: 4862-4870.
330-334.
Sharma, A., R.A. Kaushik, D.K. Sarolia and R.P. Sharma, 2011. Response Received: June, 2019; Revised: October, 2019; Accepted: December, 2019
of cultivars, plant geometry and methods of fertilizer application on
parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under zero energy
polyhouse condition. Veg. Sci., 38(2): 215-217.

Journal of Applied Horticulture (www.horticultureresearch.net)

You might also like