0% found this document useful (0 votes)
136 views2 pages

Case Study Grading Rubric

This document provides a grading rubric for a case study assignment in a business course. It outlines the criteria that will be evaluated and the potential points allocated to each. The main criteria are content, synthesis of course theories/concepts, application of scholarly research, structure, mechanics, APA style, and word count. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for advanced, proficient, developing and not present performance levels.

Uploaded by

Hayley Tiger
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
136 views2 pages

Case Study Grading Rubric

This document provides a grading rubric for a case study assignment in a business course. It outlines the criteria that will be evaluated and the potential points allocated to each. The main criteria are content, synthesis of course theories/concepts, application of scholarly research, structure, mechanics, APA style, and word count. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for advanced, proficient, developing and not present performance levels.

Uploaded by

Hayley Tiger
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_D03_202130

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 24 to >22.0 pts 22 to >18.0 pts 18 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 24 pts

Case Advanced Proficient Developing Not


Analysis Present
Insightful throughout. Specific, solid. Less Vague, obvious,
Completely developed all carefully developed. underdeveloped, or too
relevant information. Critical Some insights. Critical broad. One or more main
issues and key problems that issues and key problems issues not identified.
supported the Case Analysis that supported the Case Limited evidence of critical
were clearly identified, Analysis were partially thinking. Critical issues
analyzed, and supported. identified, analyzed, and and key problems that
supported. supported the Case
Analysis were not clearly
identified, analyzed, and
supported.

Content 24 to >22.0 pts 22 to >18.0 pts 18 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 24 pts

Synthesis Advanced Proficient Developing Not


of course Present
theories/ Convincingly interpreted and Relevant. Appropriately A few generalized
concepts linked to course theories/ interpreted and linked to connections made to
and case concepts. Considers context main course course theories/concepts.
analysis and limits of position where theories/concepts. Key Connections not clearly
appropriate. Key points were points were partially linked to case. Key points
clearly identified and identified and supported were not identified and
supported with a well thought with a well thought out supported with a well
out rationale based on rationale based on thought out rationale based
applying specific concepts or applying specific on applying specific
analytical frameworks to the concepts or analytical concepts or analytical
data provided in the case. frameworks to the data frameworks to the data
provided in the case. provided in the case.

Content 22 to >20.0 pts 20 to >18.0 pts 18 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 22 pts

Application Advanced Proficient Developing Not


of Present
Scholarly Author accurately applied 4 Author accurately Author accurately applied 1
Research or more scholarly (peer applied at least 3 or 2 scholarly (peer
reviewed) sources. scholarly (peer reviewed) reviewed) sources.
sources.

Structure 10 to >8.0 pts 8 to >7.0 pts 7 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 10 pts

Mechanics Advanced Proficient Developing Not


Present
Correct spelling and There are 2-3 errors in There are more than 3
grammar are used grammar or spelling that errors in grammar or
throughout the essay. There distract the reader from spelling that distract the
are 0–1 errors in grammar or the content. reader from the content.
spelling that distract the
reader from the content.
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_D03_202130
Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 10 to >8.0 pts 8 to >7.0 pts 7 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 10 pts

APA Style Advanced Proficient Developing Not


Present
There are 0–1 minor errors in There are 2–3 minor There are more than 3
APA format in the required errors in APA format in errors in APA format in the
items: title page, running the required items. required items.
head, font type and size, line
spacing, headings, citations,
and references.

Structure 10 to >8.0 pts 8 to >7.0 pts 7 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 10 pts

Word Advanced Proficient Developing Not


Count Present
The minimum word count The word count of at The word count of
900 words is met. Excluding least 800 words is met. 500–799 words. Excluding
the cover page and Excluding the cover the cover page and
References page(s). page and References References page(s).
page(s).

Total Points: 100

You might also like