Project Tracker (Student Guide Meeting)
Project Tracker (Student Guide Meeting)
Tracker
Group Number :-
Project Title:-
Name of Guide
Name of Co-Guide
It is the largest single piece of work you will do during your degree course.
It is the part of the curriculum that allows you to specialise in a topic you are
good at or enjoy.
It is the part of your course that prospective employers will most likely ask
you about at interview;
It allows you to show off a wide range of the skills and knowledge learned
during your course;
The three things that external examiners in recent years have most
frequently criticised projects for is lack of a proper literature review, failure
to adopt an engineering approach and lack of a critical element.
A proper literature review is necessary for you to show that you can place your
work in the wider context of computing and that you have adequately found out
about previous work in the field that may guide your project.
The critical element involves showing what you independently (in your
professional judgement) believe to be good and bad about what you’ve read, what
you’ve been taught, what you’ve been asked to do, what you’ve done, what you
haven’t done and the consequences of those. It does not involve blindly accepting
as fact everything that you have been told or seen written down.
A project must be big enough to fill your time for about 10 months (including winter
vacations). On the other hand, it must also be small enough for you to have a
reasonable chance of completing it within that timeframe.
2
During the course of a project, you will undoubtedly undertake many different
activities. These will include:
Analysing requirements.
Whatever the nature of the problem you set out to solve, the conclusion of
your project should be whether you solved it successfully or not.
PROJECT GUIDE/SUPERVISOR
Every student project must have two Project Guides/supervisors, One Main Guide
and One Co-Guide. The supervisor’s role is to guide you through the project
process and help you if you have problems. The Guide is not there to do the
project for you. Your Project Guide will be seeing you each week to discuss the
progress of your project. Its responsibility of the students to seek guidance from
your supervisor every week. Any failure in doing so would lead to severe penalties
in terms of marks.
3
REPORT WRITING
Project report is a written evidence of tasks, processes and activities that are undertaken and
accomplished by the students while pursuing their projects and implementing it.
This report is an official document that reflects precise and concrete information about the
different aspects of the project ranging from the overview, requirements, practical aspects,
theoretical considerations, tasks furnished, outcomes gained, objectives listed, reports attached,
abstracts, experiments and results, conclusions and recommendations to the implementation and
scope of the project.
Thus, a project report provides complete information about the project to the reader, and
therefore, it is a mandatory document that must be submitted to as per follows
1. Project Guide,
3. University Copy.
More often than not such a valuable project report is poorly drafted and presented, and
therefore fails to attract the attention of the departmental authorities who usually conduct
exams. Apart from this, such a poorly drafted report not even gets proper attention from
its readers as well. Eventually, it leads to poor impression, and the possessor of such a
report usually scores low marks in projects.
4
ABES Engineering College
Ghaziabad
Department of
Electronics and Communication Engineering
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME GUIDE CO- GUIDE
PROJECT ABSTRACT
6
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
2
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
3
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
4
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
5
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
6
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
7
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
8
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
9
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
10
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
11
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
12
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
13
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
14
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
15
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
16
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
17
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
18
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
19
Student- Guide Meeting
Objective of Meeting:-
Task Completed:-
Review:
Conclusions:
20
Evaluation
1. The evaluation of students would be according to following Rubrix, which is designed separately for VIIth
and VIIIth Semester. The evaluation Rubrix has to be filled by faculty Guide.
2. Faculty Guide should maintain all 6 Rubrix sheets for each student in the group separately as per his/her
performance and should be submitted to the office after completion of evaluation.
3. Final marks statement has to be maintained separately for all students in the group and should be
submitted in the department on completion of evaluation.
Rubric # R1-B.Tech Project (7th Semester)
Statement: Project proposal evaluation: An ability to propose a project which is relevant to subject of engineering after
detailed literature survey and technical feasibility
Expectation:-->
Exceeds expectations Adequately meets expectations Minimally Meets expectation Fails to meet expectation
Expectations Point:4 Expectations Point:3 Expectations Point:2 Expectations Point:1 Score
Criteria
C3:Specifications of
Identified and discussed major
project, analysis of Identified and discussed all constraints, Fails to identify the constraints
Identified and discussed major constraints, constraints, criteria, and
technical feasibility, criteria, and assumptions and constructed and assumptions. Did not
criteria, and assumptions and constructed assumptions and constructed an
criteria, constraints and complete specifications of the project identify the specifications of the
broad specifications of the project proposal outline of specifications of the
assumptions: proposal project proposal.
project proposal
Total Score
Rubric #R 2-B.Tech Project (7th semester)
Statement: Project design: An ability to design the system components and process and identify the engineering tools
required with due consideration of assumptions and constraints and societal considerations
Expectation:-->
Adequately meets Minimally Meets Fails to meet expectation
Exceeds expectations expectations expectation
Expectations Point:4 Score
Expectations Point:3 Expectations Point:2 Expectations Point:1
Criteria
C1: Methodology
proposed for project
design,
implementation
strategy and
engineering tools
required
C2:Technical
knowledge and
awareness about
the project
C3:Communication
skills (Written, oral
and presentation
skills)
Total Score
Rubric #R 3-B.Tech Project (8th semester)
Statement: First project review: An ability to use management skills and implement the project, manage problems
encountered, work as a team member and present the work progress
Expectation:-->
Adequately meets Fails to meet expectation
Exceeds expectations Minimally Meets expectation
expectations
Expectations Point:4 Expectations Point:2 Score
Expectations Point:3 Expectations Point:1
Criteria
C1:Review of
design
methodology
used
C2: Project
management
skills
C3:
Demonstration
and
presentation
C4:Individual
and team work
Total Score
Rubric # R4-B.Tech Project (8th Semester)
Statement: Final project review and evaluation: An ability to appreciate suggestions made in the first review, make informed review and
manage resources within the constraints
Expectation:-->
Adequately meets Fails to meet expectation
Exceeds expectations Minimally Meets expectation
expectations
Expectations Point:4 Expectations Point:2 Score
Expectations Point:3 Expectations Point:1
Criteria
C1:
Incorporation
of suggestions
C2:Project
Demonstration
C3: Analysis of
problems
encountered
and remedial
actions taken
C4: Impact on
society and
environment
Total Score
Rubric # R5-B.Tech Project
Statement: Project report review: Able to prepare a Project report which is consistent with standard technical report writing procedures.
C1:Organizatio
n of report
C2:Figures,
formatting,
diagrams,
graphs, tables
and
mathematics
C3:Description
of concepts and
technical
details
C4: Discussions
and
Conclusions
C5:
Bibliography
C6:Originality
and plagiarism
Total Score
Rubric # R6-B.Tech Project
Statement: Review by the Guide: Ability to work as a team and contribute effectively with positive attitude
Expectation:-->
Adequately meets Fails to meet expectation
Exceeds expectations Minimally Meets expectation
expectations
Expectations Point:4 Expectations Point:2 Score
Expectations Point:3 Expectations Point:1
Criteria
C1:Positive
attitude,
commitment,
team work and
contribution
C2:Technical
knowledge,
awareness
related to
project
C3:Regularity
and attendance
Total Score
Rubrics for B.Tech Final year project
Semester No. of Rubrics No. of criteria Total points Student’s MM of sessional Sessional marks awarded to the
of Rubrics score in marks students(based on % score in Rubrics)
Rubrics
VII 2 7 28 50
VIII 4 17 68 100
Final Year Project 6 24 96
Group Number:-
Project Name:-
Findings:-
Final Outcome:-
Future Scope:-
Remarks(Guide):-
Signature Signature
Guide/Co-Guide Head of Department