0% found this document useful (0 votes)
131 views3 pages

Solutions To The 58th William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition Saturday, December 6, 1997

This document contains solutions to problems from the 58th William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition from December 6, 1997 authored by Manjul Bhargava, Kiran Kedlaya, and Lenny Ng. It provides detailed step-by-step solutions to 6 problems labeled A-1 through A-6. The solutions involve techniques from calculus, linear algebra, number theory, and other areas of mathematics.

Uploaded by

Ren Jenkins
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
131 views3 pages

Solutions To The 58th William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition Saturday, December 6, 1997

This document contains solutions to problems from the 58th William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition from December 6, 1997 authored by Manjul Bhargava, Kiran Kedlaya, and Lenny Ng. It provides detailed step-by-step solutions to 6 problems labeled A-1 through A-6. The solutions involve techniques from calculus, linear algebra, number theory, and other areas of mathematics.

Uploaded by

Ren Jenkins
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Solutions to the 58th William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition

Saturday, December 6, 1997


Manjul Bhargava, Kiran Kedlaya, and Lenny Ng

A–1 The centroid G of the triangle is collinear with H and O A–3 Note that the series on the left is simply x exp(−x2 /2).
(Euler line), and the centroid lies two-thirds of the way By integration by parts,
from A to M. Therefore H is also two-thirds of the way Z ∞ Z ∞
2 /2 2 /2
from A to F, so AF = 15. Since the triangles BFH and x2n+1 e−x dx = 2n x2n−1 e−x dx
AFC are similar (they’re right triangles and 0 0

∠HBC = π/2 − ∠C = ∠CAF), and so by induction,


Z ∞
2 /2
we have x2n+1 e−x dx = 2 × 4 × · · · × 2n.
0
BF/FH = AF/FC Thus the desired integral is simply
or ∞
1 √
∑ 2n n! = e.
BF · FC = FH · AF = 75. n=0

Now A–4 In order to have ψ(x) = aφ (x) for all x, we must in par-
ticular have this for x = e, and so we take a = φ (e)−1 .
BC2 = (BF + FC)2 = (BF − FC)2 + 4BF · FC, We first note that
but φ (g)φ (e)φ (g−1 ) = φ (e)φ (g)φ (g−1 )
BF − FC = BM + MF − (MC − MF) = 2MF = 22, and so φ (g) commutes with φ (e) for all g. Next, we
note that
so
p √ φ (x)φ (y)φ (y−1 x−1 ) = φ (e)φ (xy)φ (y−1 x−1 )
BC = 222 + 4 · 75 = 784 = 28.
and using the commutativity of φ (e), we deduce
A–2 We show more precisely that the game terminates with
one player holding all of the pennies if and only if n = φ (e)−1 φ (x)φ (e)−1 φ (y) = φ (e)−1 φ (xy)
2m +1 or n = 2m +2 for some m. First suppose we are in
the following situation for some k ≥ 2. (Note: for us, a or ψ(xy) = ψ(x)ψ(y), as desired.
“move” consists of two turns, starting with a one-penny
pass.) A–5 We may discard any solutions for which a1 6= a2 , since
those come in pairs; so assume a1 = a2 . Similarly, we
– Except for the player to move, each player has k may assume that a3 = a4 , a5 = a6 , a7 = a8 , a9 = a10 .
pennies; Thus we get the equation
– The player to move has at least k pennies. 2/a1 + 2/a3 + 2/a5 + 2/a7 + 2/a9 = 1.
We claim then that the game terminates if and only if
the number of players is a power of 2. First suppose Again, we may assume a1 = a3 and a5 = a7 , so we get
the number of players is even; then after m complete 4/a1 + 4/a5 + 2/a9 = 1; and a1 = a5 , so 8/a1 + 2/a9 =
rounds, every other player, starting with the player who 1. This implies that (a1 − 8)(a9 − 2) = 16, which by
moved first, will have m more pennies than initially, and counting has 5 solutions. Thus N10 is odd.
the others will all have 0. Thus we are reduced to the A–6 Clearly xn+1 is a polynomial in c of degree n, so it suf-
situation with half as many players; by this process, we fices to identify n values of c for which xn+1 = 0. We
eventually reduce to the case where the number of play- claim these are c = n − 1 − 2r for r = 0, 1, . . . , n − 1;
ers is odd. However, if there is more than one player, in this case, xk is the coefficient of t k−1 in the polyno-
after two complete rounds everyone has as many pen- mial f (t) = (1 − t)r (1 + t)n−1−r . This can be verified
nies as they did before (here we need m ≥ 2), so the by noticing that f satisfies the differential equation
game fails to terminate. This verifies the claim.
Returning to the original game, note that after one com- f 0 (t) n − 1 − r r
= −
plete round, b n−1
2 c players remain, each with 2 pennies
f (t) 1+t 1−t
except for the player to move, who has either 3 or 4 pen-
nies. Thus by the above argument, the game terminates
if and only if b n−1
2 c is a power of 2, that is, if and only
if n = 2m + 1 or n = 2m + 2 for some m.
2

(by logarithmic differentiation) or equivalently, It is immediate (e.g., by induction) that In ≡


1, −1, 1, 0, 0 (mod 5) for n ≡ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (mod 5) respec-
(1 − t 2 ) f 0 (t) = f (t)[(n − 1 − r)(1 − t) − r(1 + t)] tively, and moreover, we have the equality
= f (t)[(n − 1 − 2r) − (n − 1)t]
k
1
Hn = ∑ I m ,
m bn/5 c
and then taking the coefficient of tk on both sides: m=0 5

(k + 1)xk+2 − (k − 1)xk = where k = k(n) denotes the largest integer such that
(n − 1 − 2r)xk+1 − (n − 1)xk . 5k ≤ n. We wish to determine those n such that the
above sum has nonnegative 5–valuation. (By the 5–
n−1 valuation of a number a we mean the largest integer v
In particular, the largest such c is n − 1, and xk = k−1
for k = 1, 2, . . . , n. such that a/5v is an integer.)
Greg Kuperberg has suggested an alternate approach to If bn/5k c ≤ 3, then the last term in the above sum
show directly that c = n − 1 is the largest root, without has 5–valuation −k, since I1 , I2 , I3 each have valua-
computing the others. Note that the condition xn+1 = 0 tion 0; on the other hand, all other terms must have 5–
states that (x1 , . . . , xn ) is an eigenvector of the matrix valuation strictly larger than −k. It follows that Hn has
 5–valuation exactly −k; in particular, Hn has nonneg-
 i j = i+1 ative 5–valuation in this case if and only if k = 0, i.e.,
Ai j = n − j j = i − 1 n = 1, 2, or 3.
 0 otherwise
Suppose now that bn/5k c = 4. Then we must also have
20 ≤ bn/5k−1 c ≤ 24. The former condition implies that
with eigenvalue c. By the Perron-Frobenius theorem, the last term of the above sum is I4 /5k = 1/(12 · 5k−2 ),
A has a unique eigenvector with positive entries, whose which has 5–valuation −(k − 2).
eigenvalue has modulus greater than or equal to that of
any other eigenvalue, which proves the claim. It is clear that I20 ≡ I24 ≡ 0 (mod 25); hence if bn/5k−1 c
equals 20 or 24, then the second–to–last term of the
m m m
B–1 It is trivial to check that 6n = { 6n } ≤ { 3n } for 1 ≤ above sum (if it exists) has valuation at least −(k −
m m m
m ≤ 2n, that 1 − 3n = { 3n } ≤ { 6n } for 2n ≤ m ≤ 3n, 3). The third–to–last term (if it exists) is of the form
m m m
that 3n − 1 = { 3n } ≤ { 6n } for 3n ≤ m ≤ 4n, and that Ir /5k−2 , so that the sum of the last term and the third to
m m m
1 − 6n = { 6n } ≤ { 3n } for 4n ≤ m ≤ 6n. Therefore the last term takes the form (Ir + 1/12)/5k−2 . Since Ir can
desired sum is be congruent only to 0,1, or -1 (mod 5), and 1/12 ≡ 3
(mod 5), we conclude that the sum of the last term
2n−1
m 3n−1  m and third–to–last term has valuation −(k − 2), while
∑ + ∑ 1−
m=1 6n m=2n 3n all other terms have valuation strictly higher. Hence
4n−1   6n−1  Hn has nonnegative 5–valuation in this case only when
m m k ≤ 2, leading to the values n = 4 (arising from k = 0),
+ ∑ −1 + ∑ 1− = n.
m=3n 3n m=4n 6n 20,24 (arising from k = 1 and bn/5k−1 c = 20 and 24
resp.), 101, 102, 103, and 104 (arising from k = 2,
B–2 It suffices to show that | f (x)| is bounded for x ≥ 0, since bn/5k−1 c = 20) and 120, 121, 122, 123, and 124 (aris-
f (−x) satisfies the same equation as f (x). But then ing from k = 2, bn/5k−1 c = 24).
Finally, suppose bn/5k c = 4 and bn/5k−1 c = 21, 22,
d
( f (x))2 + ( f 0 (x))2 = 2 f 0 (x)( f (x) + f 00 (x)) or 23. Then as before, the first condition implies that

dx the last term of the sum in (*) has valuation −(k − 2),
= −2xg(x)( f 0 (x))2 ≤ 0, while the second condition implies that the second–to–
last term in the same sum has valuation −(k −1). Hence
so that ( f (x))2 ≤ ( f (0))2 + ( f 0 (0))2 for x ≥ 0. all terms in the sum (*) have 5–valuation strictly higher
than −(k − 1), except for the second–to–last term, and
B–3 The only such n are the numbers 1–4, 20–24, 100–104, therefore Hn has 5–valuation −(k − 1) in this case. In
and 120–124. For the proof let particular, Hn is integral (mod 5) in this case if and only
n if k ≤ 1, which gives the additional values n = 21, 22,
1
Hn = ∑ and 23.
m=1 m
B–4 Let sk = ∑i (−1)i ak−1,i be the given sum (note that ak−1,i
and introduce the auxiliary function is nonzero precisely for i = 0, . . . , b 2k
3 c). Since
1 am+1,n = am,n + am,n−1 + am,n−2 ,
In = ∑ .
1≤m≤n,(m,5)=1
m
3

we have and that AD < CD. In any dissection of the triangle


into four parts, some two of A, B,C, D, E must belong to
sk − sk−1 + sk+2 = ∑(−1)i (an−i,i + an−i,i+1 + an−i,i+2 ) the same part, forcing the least diameter to be at least
i 25/13.
= ∑(−1)i an−i+1,i+2 = sk+3 . We now exhibit a dissection with least diameter 25/13.
i
(Some variations of this dissection are possible.) Put
By computing s0 = 1, s1 = 1, s2 = 0, we may easily F = (15/13, 19/13), G = (15/13, 0), H = (0, 19/13),
verify by induction that s4 j = s4 j+1 = 1 and s4 j+2 = J = (32/15, 15/13), and divide ABC into the convex
s4 j+3 = 0 for all j ≥ 0. (Alternate solution suggested by polygonal regions ADFH, BEJ, CGFH, DFGEJ. To
John Rickert: write S(x, y) = ∑∞ 2 2 3 i check that this dissection has least diameter 25/13, it
i=0 (y + xy + x y ) , and
note note that sk is the coefficient of yk in S(−1, y) = suffices (by the following remark) to check that the dis-
(1 + y)/(1 − y4 ).) tances

B–5 Define the sequence x1 = 2, xn = 2xn−1 for n > 1. It suf- AD, AF, AH, BE, BJ, DE,CF,CG,CH,
fices to show that for every n, xm ≡ xm+1 ≡ · · · (mod n) DF, DG, DH, DJ, EF, EG, EJ, FG, FH, FJ, GJ
for some m < n. We do this by induction on n, with
n = 2 being obvious. are all at most 25/13. This can be checked by a long
Write n = 2a b,where b is odd. It suffices to show that numerical calculation, which we omit in favor of some
xm ≡ · · · modulo 2a and modulo b, for some m < n. shortcuts: note that ADFH and BEJ are contained in
For the former, we only need xn−1 ≥ a, but clearly circular sectors centered at A and B, respectively, of ra-
xn−1 ≥ n by induction on n. For the latter, note that dius 25/13 and angle less than π/3, while CGFH is a
xm ≡ xm+1 ≡ · · · (mod b) as long as xm−1 ≡ xm ≡ · · · rectangle with diameter CF < 25/13.
(mod φ (b)), where φ (n) is the Euler totient function. Remark. The preceding argument uses implicitly the
By hypothesis, this occurs for some m < φ (b) + 1 ≤ n. fact that for P a simple closed polygon in the plane, if
(Thanks to Anoop Kulkarni for catching a lethal typo in we let S denote the set of points on or within P, then the
an earlier version.) maximum distance between two points of S occurs be-
tween some pair of vertices of P. This is an immediate
B–6 The answer is 25/13. Place the triangle on the cartesian consequence of the compactness of S (which guarantees
plane so that its vertices are at C = (0, 0), A = (0, 3), B = the existence of a maximum) and the convexity of the
(4, 0). Define also the points D = (20/13, 24/13), and function taking (x, y) ∈ S × S to the squared distance be-
E = (27/13, 0). We then compute that tween x and y (which is obvious in terms of Cartesian
25 coordinates).
= AD = BE = DE
13
27
= BC −CE = BE < BC
13
39 p
= AC < AC2 +CE 2 = AE
13
40
= AB − AD = BD < AB
13

You might also like