Scribd
Upload
224 views1 page

Rubric For Lab Report CHM083

The document outlines the rubric for evaluating laboratory reports in a Pre-Diploma Science course at UiTM. It provides the criteria and marks allocated for key components of the report, including the introduction, procedures, results/data, discussion, and conclusion. For each component, it describes the level of detail, accuracy, and scientific writing expected to achieve full versus partial marks. Overall, the rubric communicates the evaluative framework used to assess the quality of information presented in students' laboratory reports.

Uploaded by

Hana The Pencil Knight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
224 views1 page

Rubric For Lab Report CHM083

The document outlines the rubric for evaluating laboratory reports in a Pre-Diploma Science course at UiTM. It provides the criteria and marks allocated for key components of the report, including the introduction, procedures, results/data, discussion, and conclusion. For each component, it describes the level of detail, accuracy, and scientific writing expected to achieve full versus partial marks. Overall, the rubric communicates the evaluative framework used to assess the quality of information presented in students' laboratory reports.

Uploaded by

Hana The Pencil Knight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES

PRE DIPLOMA SCIENCE UiTM (CHEMISTRY FOR PRE SCIENCE - CHM083)


RUBRIC FOR LABORATORY REPORT

Items Citeria/ Marks


Introduction (1%) Well written. Used all proper Well written. Used some Written in basic form. Used Written in basic form. Does not use
science vocabulary to proper science vocabulary minimal science vocabulary science vocabulary to introduce
introduce the topic. (1 mark) to introduce the topic. to introduce the topic. (0.5 the topic. (0.25 mark)
(0.75 mark) mark)
Procedures Good description with step- Satisfactory, includes Missing some relevant Poor description with missing
(1%) by-step relevant experimental details. steps/incorrect steps/copied
list of how experiment was experimental details. (0.5 mark) directly from the laboratory
done, (0.75 mark) manual.
with diagrams where (0.25 mark)
appropriate.
(1 mark)
Results/ Data/ Good data/results, complete Acceptable data/results as Incomplete data/results, Inconsistent data/results,
Observations/ calculations (with inclusion of required, complete some missing below expectations, incorrect
Calculations (4 %) correct number of significant calculations data/calculation steps. calculations.
figures). Includes observations but neglects significant (2 marks) (1 mark)
and figures.
safety information, where (3 marks)
appropriate.
(4 marks)
Discussion (3%) Clear discussion of the results, Insufficient discussion to Incomplete discussion, Poor discussion, does not
thorough understanding of support results, although partial understanding of demonstrate understanding
experimental concepts. shows experimental concepts. of experimental concepts.
(3 marks) understanding of (1 marks) (0.5 marks)
experimental
concepts.
(2 marks)
Conclusion (1%) Conclusion is completely Conclusion is adequate. Conclusion is incomplete. Conclusion is in conflict with
aligned with the experimental (0.75 mark) (0.5 mark) objectives and results.
objectives. Not submitted.
(1 marks) (0 mark)

You might also like