Scribd
Upload
75 views

SALES - Course Outline

This document outlines the course objectives and content for a Law on Sales course. The course aims to familiarize students with concepts and legal provisions related to sales law, and apply these principles to practical scenarios. It lists the key principles that will be covered, including essential contract requirements, different types of sales contracts, parties to contracts, contract formation, subject matter, price and consideration, obligations of vendors and vendees, breach of contracts, and contract extinguishment. Numerous related cases are cited for each topic to illustrate the application of sales law.

Uploaded by

Paul Salazar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views

SALES - Course Outline

This document outlines the course objectives and content for a Law on Sales course. The course aims to familiarize students with concepts and legal provisions related to sales law, and apply these principles to practical scenarios. It lists the key principles that will be covered, including essential contract requirements, different types of sales contracts, parties to contracts, contract formation, subject matter, price and consideration, obligations of vendors and vendees, breach of contracts, and contract extinguishment. Numerous related cases are cited for each topic to illustrate the application of sales law.

Uploaded by

Paul Salazar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

LAW ON SALES

1st Semester, AY 2020 – 2021


Judge Kim A. Enage, CPA

CASE LIST*

COURSE OBJECTIVES:

At the end of the semester, the students are expected to:


1. Familiarize themselves with the pertinent concepts and legal provisions on the Law on Sales,
including related jurisprudence;
2. Relate the above principles to specific practical scenarios and apply accordingly.

BASIC PRINCIPLES
Essential Requirements of Contracts
Contract of Sale
Contract to Sell
Conditional Contract of Sale

CASES:
Spouses Herrera v. Caguiat, GR# 139173
Nabus v. Pacson, GR# 161318
Reyes v. Tuparan, GR# 188064
Salazar v. CA, GR# 118203
Castillo v. Reyes, 539 SCRA 193
United Muslim and Christian Urban Poor Association, Inc. v. BRYC-V Development,
GR#179653
People’s Homesite & Housing Corp. v. CA, 133 SCRA 777 (1984)
Lim v. CA182 SCRA 566 (1990)
Pingol v. CA, 226 SCRA 118 (1993)

PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT OF SALE


Capacity of Parties
Special Disqualifications

CASES:
Medina v. CIR, 1 SCRA 302 (1961)
Calimlim-Canullas v. Fortun, 129 SCRA 675 (1984)
Philippine Trust Co. v. Roldan, 99 Phil 32 (1956)
Rubias v. Batiller, 51 SCRA 120 (1973)
Macariola v. Asuncion, 114 SCRA 77 (1982)
Director of Lands v. Ababa, 88 SCRA 513 (1979)
Maharlika Publishing v. Tagle, GR L-65594 (1986)
Mangayao v. de Guzman, 55 SCRA 540 (1974)
De Leon v. CA, GR# 88788 (1992)
Yap v. Grageda, GR# L-31606 (1983)

FORMATION OF THE CONTRACT OF SALE


Offer
Perfection
Formalities of Contract

CASES:
Villonco v. Bormaheco, 65 SCRA 352 (1975)
Zayco v. Serra, 44 Phil 326 (1923)
Cronico v. JM Tuason, GR L-35272 (1977)
Carceller v. CA, 302 SCRA 718 (1999)
Villamor v. CA, 202 SCRA 607 (1991)
Tanay Recreation v. Fausto, 455 SCRA 436 (2005)
San Miguel Properties v. Huang, 336 SCRA 737 (2000)
Secuya v. vda de Selma, 326 SCRA 244 (2000)
Claudel v. CA, 199 SCRA 113 (1991)

SUBJECT MATTER
Requisites of a Valid Subject Matter
Particular Kinds

CASES:
Pichel v. Alonzo, 111 SCRA 34 (1982)
Melliza v. City of Iloilo, 23 SCRA 477 (1968)
Yturalde v. CA, 43 SCRA 313 (1972)
Gaite v. Fonacier, 2 SCRA 831 (1961)
Laroza v. Guia, GR# L-45252

PRICE AND OTHER CONSIDERATION


CASES:
Bagnas v. CA, 176 SCRA 159 (1989)
Vda. De Gordon v. CA, 109 SCRA 88 (1981)
Ong v. Ong, 139 SCRA 133 (1985)
Ladanga v. CA, 131 SCRA 361 (1984)
Republic v. Phil. Resources, 102 Phil 960 (1958)
Toyota Shaw v. CA, 244 SCRA 320 (1995)
OBLIGATIONS OF THE VENDOR
Transfer Ownership to the Vendee
Delivery of the Thing with Fruits and Accessories
Double Sale, Risk of Loss, Warranties

CASES:
Cebu Winland Dev. Corp. v. Ong Siao Hua, 588 SCRA 120 (2009)
Kuenzle v. Macke, 14 Phil 610 (1909)
Ocejo Perez & Co. v. International Bank, 37 Phil 631 (1918)
Obana v. CA, 135 SCRA 557 (1985)
Vallarta v. CA, 150 SCRA 336 (1987)
Aznar v. Yapdiangco, 13 SCRA 486 (1965)
Noel v. CA, GR# 59550 (1995)
Asset Privatization Trust v. T.J. Enterprises, GR#167195 (2009)
Hernaez v. Hernaez, 32 Phil 214 (1915)
Jalbuena v. Lizarraga, 33 Phil 77 (1915)
Masiclat v. Centeno, GR# 8420 (1956)
De Garcia v. CA, 37 SCRA 129 (1971)
EDCA Publishing v. Santos, 184 SCRA 614 (1990)

Smith Bell v. Matti, 44 Phil 874 (1922)


Soler v. Chelsey, 43 Phil 529 (1922)
Republic v. Litton, 94 Phil 52 (1953)
Esguerra v. Trinidad, 518 SCRA 186 (2007)
Alfredo v. Borras, 404 SCRA 145 (2003)
Santos v. Santos, 366 SCRA 395 (2001)
Express Credit v. Velasco, 473 SCRA 590 (2005)
Tanglao v. Parungao, 535 SCRA 123 (2007)
Cheng v. Genato, 300 SCRA 722 (1998)
Agricultural & Home Extension v. CA, 213 SCRA 536 (1992)
Beatingo v. Gasis, GR# 179641 (2011)
Norkis v. CA, 193 SCRA 694 (1991)
Guinhawa v. People, 468 SCRA 278 (2005)
Ang v. Court of Appeals, GR# 177874
Nutrimix Feeds Corp. v. CA, 441 SCRA 357 (2004)
De Guzman v. Toyota Cubao, GR# 141480 (2006)

OBIGATIONS OF THE VENDEE


Accept Delivery
Pay the Price

CASES:
Torcuator v. Bernabe, 459 SCRA 439 (2005)
Bareng v. CA, 107 Phil 641 (1960)
Spouses Mahusay v. B.E. San Diego Inc., GR# 179675 (2011)

BREACH OF CONTRACT
Remedies of Unpaid Vendor
Sale of Movables
Sale of Immovables

CASES:
Katigbak v. CA, 4 SCRA 243 (1962)
Borbon v. Servicewide, 258 SCRA 634 (1996)
Nonato v. IAC, 140 SCRA 255 (1985)
Delta Motor Sales v. Niu Kim Duan, 213 SCRA 259 (1992)
Elisco Tool Manufacturing Corp. v. CA, 307 SCRA 731 (1999)
PCI Leasing and Finance v. Giraffe-X Creative Imaging, Inc., 527 SCRA 405 (2007)
Casa Filipina Realty v. OP, 241 SCRA 165 (1995)
Manila Banking Corp. v. Spouses Rabina, GR# 145941 (2008)
Rillo v.CA, 274 SCRA 46 (1997)
Active Realty v. Daroya, 382 SCRA 152 (2002)
Fabrigas v. San Francisco del Monte, 475 SCRA 247 (2005)
Jestra Devt & Management Corp. v. Pacifico, 513 SCRA 413 (2007)

EXTINGUISHMENT OF SALE
Causes
Conventional Redemption
Legal Redemption

CASES:
Villarica v. CA, 26 SCRA 189 (1963)
Torres v. CA, 216 SCRA 287 (1992)
Arrofo v. Quino, 449 SCRA 285 (2005)- Equitable mortgage elements (important)
Adiarte v. Tumaneng, 88 Phil 333 (1951) – how to apply 10 year period of pacto de Retro
Heirs of Arches v. Diaz, 50 SCRA 440 (1973) -
Gargollo v. Duero, 1 SCRA 1311 (1961)
Butte v. Manuel Uy, 4 SCRA 526 (1962) – co owners law – 1620
Conejero v. CA, 16 SCRA 775 (1966) -
Doromal v. CA, 66 SCRA 575 (1975)
Francisco v. Boiser, 332 SCRA 305 (2000)
Misterio v. Cebu State College of Science and Technology, 461 SCRA 122 (2005)

*Additional cases shall be assigned as deemed necessary.

You might also like