Bateca, J. & Lizcano, S. (2021) Identifying How Foreign Language Anxiety Influences B2 Learnes' Oral Production.
Bateca, J. & Lizcano, S. (2021) Identifying How Foreign Language Anxiety Influences B2 Learnes' Oral Production.
ORAL PRODUCTION.
Faculty of Education
University of Pamplona
2021
Faculty of Education
University of Pamplona
2021
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 2
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Summary
This mixed study aimed at identifying how language anxiety (FLA) affects English
Although several research studies have explored the FLA in language learners, (e.g.,
language anxiety among university students: causal factors and coping strategies, Kamaruddin
and Abdullah (2015), Factors Generating Anxiety When Learning EFL Speaking Skills, Hanifa (
2018), Identifying Factors that Affect FL Learners’ Oral Participation at a Public University in
Colombia, Cañas (2013), in Colombian students this issue has not been widely analyzed since
there are factors such as teachers’ influence that need to be taken into consideration. This study
attempted to identify the main factors that affected FL learners’ oral productions and helped to
identify different causes that influenced oral performance such as negative thoughts associated
with oral abilities, being evaluated quantitatively, and the strategies implemented by teachers
This study was carried out at a public university in Colombia; participants were six B2.2
English level of proficiency learners. Data was gathered through six classroom observations,
two semi-structured interviews, and Horwitz and Cope’s (1986) foreign language classroom
This presentation will show the findings in the light of five research questions about: 1)
The reasons why speaking anxiety is caused; 2) the sources of FLA 3) the way FLA is
manifested 4) the negative effects of FLA and 5) the strategies to cope with FLA.
List of tables...................................................................................................................................7
List of Appendixes.........................................................................................................................8
CHAPTER I...................................................................................................................................9
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................9
1.1 Statement of the problem.............................................................................................10
Research questions.......................................................................................................................12
1.1.1 General Question..........................................................................................................12
1.1.2 Specific questions.........................................................................................................12
1.2 Research objectives............................................................................................................13
1.2.1 General objective..........................................................................................................13
1.2.2 Specific objectives........................................................................................................13
1.3 Limitations..........................................................................................................................14
1.4 Ethical considerations.......................................................................................................15
CHAPTER II................................................................................................................................16
2.1 Theoretical framework......................................................................................................16
2.1.1 Communicative competence.........................................................................................17
2.1.2 Foreign language anxiety (FLA)..................................................................................21
2.2 Conceptual framework......................................................................................................26
2.3 Literature review...............................................................................................................28
2.3.1 Main causes and influence of foreign language anxiety (FLA) in EFL students.........29
2.3.2 Main causes and effects of anxiety among English students during their oral
productions............................................................................................................................32
CHAPTER III..............................................................................................................................35
Methodology.................................................................................................................................35
3.1 Methodological approach and Design..............................................................................35
3.2 Setting.................................................................................................................................37
3.3 Population, participants and sample................................................................................38
3.4 Data collection techniques and instruments....................................................................39
3.4.1 Class Observation.........................................................................................................39
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 4
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
3.4.2 Field diary.....................................................................................................................40
3.4.4 Reflective Journal.........................................................................................................40
3.4.5 Semi-structured Interviews...........................................................................................41
3.4.6 Test: Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS)......................................42
3.5 Timeline of activities..........................................................................................................42
3.6 Data collection process......................................................................................................46
3.7 Implementation of the data collection instruments........................................................48
3.7.1 Permission letters..........................................................................................................48
3.7.2 Selection of participants...............................................................................................49
3.7.3 Semi-structured interviews...........................................................................................49
3.7.4 Test: Foreign language classroom anxiety scale (FLCAS)..........................................50
3.7.5 Permission letter sent to Elaine Horwitz......................................................................50
3.7.6 Validation Process........................................................................................................50
3.7.7 Class observation..........................................................................................................51
3.7.8 Field notes.....................................................................................................................51
3.7.9 Observation protocol....................................................................................................51
3.7.10 Reflective Journal.......................................................................................................52
3.8 Data Analysis......................................................................................................................52
3.9 Method of data analysis and validation...........................................................................53
3.9.1 Qualitative data Analysis..............................................................................................54
4.9.2 Quantitative data Analysis............................................................................................58
3.9.1 Selecting, Organizing and Categorizing the data.........................................................58
CHAPTER IV..............................................................................................................................60
RESULTS.....................................................................................................................................60
1.1 Qualitative data results.....................................................................................................60
Sources of Foreign Language Anxiety..................................................................................60
Symptoms of Foreign Language Anxiety..............................................................................62
Negative effects in the oral Communication.........................................................................63
Strategies to cope with Foreign Language Anxiety...............................................................64
4.2 Quantitative data analysis.................................................................................................66
Category 1: Communication Apprehension..........................................................................66
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 5
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Category 2: Test Anxiety.......................................................................................................67
Category 3: Fear of negative Evaluation...............................................................................68
CHAPTER 5.................................................................................................................................71
CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................................71
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................74
APPENDICES..............................................................................................................................80
INTRODUCTION
pragmatic components that are indispensable for learning and communicating in English as a
However, during the practice, EFL learners must deal with cognitive and affective
challenges that sometimes delay their communicative development in a foreign language. One of
these challenges is anxiety that makes part of the affective factors; Spielberger (1983) defined
anxiety as ‘‘subjective feelings that cause tension, apprehension, nervousness and worry.’’ This
issue has been explored by psychologists and linguists since the 1970s, and the findings have
contributed to foreign language teaching pedagogy (Chen, 2015). But it is necessary to specify
the term anxiety into the foreign languages since theorists as Horwitz and Cope explain that
‘‘anxiety is different from each specific discipline.’’ They were the first to conceptualize foreign
language anxiety (FLA) as a unique type of anxiety specific to foreign language learning (Tran,
2012, p.69), and it has allowed researchers to study and to understand this issue as a real
beliefs, feelings, and behaviors related to classroom language learning and arising from the
uniqueness of the language learning process” (As cited in Szyszka, 2017). This definition
clarifies the difference of foreign language anxiety from general anxiety involving the learner
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 9
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
and stating the sensations and preoccupations that he can experiment inside the classroom; to the
learner, this issue is something subjective and causes him discomfort and inhibitions when
Foreign language anxiety is mostly seen as a factor that has negative effects and delay
learners’ competences such as communication which is an important skill in real life. However,
for some students, it can have a positive effect that helps them to improve their oral
communication. In relation with this idea, Paradowski, Dmoska and Czasak (2015, p35) stated
that “certain levels of anxiety can motivate the student and improve her/his performance –
anxious individuals can compensate for the increased cognitive demands and reduced processing
effectiveness by expending more effort in the learning process.” (Karaman (n.d) para.9)
Thus, previous researches on language anxiety have helped to measure language anxiety
in formal education context, Horwitz et al. (1986) were one of the pioneers investigating FLA,
and due to the conflicting findings in the earlier anxiety research, they introduced the foreign
language classroom anxiety scale (FLCAS) as an instrument to measure anxiety levels that
consist of thirty-three levels (Tran, 2012) this scale was accepted and results were more
conscious.
MacIntyre & Gardner (as cited in Gałajda, 2017) established that foreign language anxiety is
a learning context.’’
One context can be the space where English learners should demonstrate what they have
learned through communication activities like oral productions which are important activities
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 10
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
that help students accomplish the goal of speaking fluently. However, some students can
experiment FLA while they are presenting oral productions, this is a common feeling that
students must face but it affects their oral performing and can become a factor of failure at the
moment of presenting an oral production, in addition, MacIntyre (1999, p. 27) defined it as “the
worry and negative emotional reaction aroused when learning or using a second language”
(Gałajda, 2017). Due to these negative effects, pronunciation can be affected since muscles get
tensioned ‘‘limiting the articulatory potential of the speaker who can perceive his pronunciation
as worse than expected” (Szyszka, 2017, p.52). Thus, in order to identify the different factors
that affect learners' communicative process and the reasons why these factors appeared on
foreign language learning, this study focuses on the students’ oral productions, and whether the
Based on our experience as students, the communicative language skill has been the most
difficult competence to acquire and to put into practice during the classes; therefore, is
interesting to understand how the existing factors in the academic environment affect the
communicative competence in learners. Many students realized that although they had the
linguistics basis, they were not prepared neither to interact with other students nor ready when
Thus, the problem address in this study are the factors that cause language anxiety in the EFL
learners inside the class during their oral productions, due to the pressure or the lack of
In terms of FL proficiency, the program where this study will be conducted requires its
students to accomplish the levels of language proficiency (depending on the semester that is
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 11
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
being cursed), following what is established in the Common European Framework of Reference
Thus, this study explores the development of students’ oral productions inside the classroom,
taking into account the behavior showed by some learners while interacting in front of a class
and the main factors that can be associated with students’ foreign language anxiety, in order to
understand why it is produced, and how this factor influences the student’s achievement. The
purpose of this study is to discover the factors that affect foreign language students’
communicative competence and that increase foreign language anxiety at the University of
Pamplona, Colombia.
Research questions
It is necessary to understand the causes of this academic issue and investigate strategies
that could help students to overcome this problem and improve their oral productions. Thus, to
explore these factors, it is necessary to follow some questions that will help to have a clear
What are the sources of or reasons that cause speaking anxiety in sixth semester students
How does language anxiety delay the communicative oral process in FLE?
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 12
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
How do the students cope with language anxiety?
To recognize which negative factors are associated with the development of FLA in the
oral competence development in EFL learners in the foreign language program at the University
of Pamplona, Colombia.
To examine how sixth semester students manifest their language anxiety in the oral
production development.
To assess how the main causes of language anxiety affects sixth semester students in his
oral productions.
students.
To observe how sixth semester students face language anxiety when developing their oral
productions.
It is pertinent to establish the limits of the investigation to provide the aspects that may
arise during the investigation process. For that reason, in this project the following limitations
will be considered:
Given that anxiety can be studied from different fields, this research is focused on
specific anxiety known as foreign language anxiety (FLA) which is presented when using a
second language inside the classroom; it is only considered the effects of FLA in oral
productions. Other aspects such as depression, self-confidence or nervousness are not considered
A limitation that is being presented while developing the present research is the few
communications among the researchers and the tutor of this research due to a sanitary problem
Finally, other limitations while collecting data are considered such as the participants’
consent, since there will be students who do not sign the informed consent, so the group from
which the information will be collected will be smaller. Also, there will be the possibility that
some students may have little interest in participating in the research and there can be others who
for some reason decide to cancel the subject during the research time.
through the application of appropriate ethical principles is important in any research study. For
that reason, some important aspects considered as key elements when conducting any research
The dignity of each participant will be respected, and consent will be the first stage before
applying any instrument of analysis. All participants will be fully informed about the research
will be conducted and how the findings will be used. Likewise, contact information will be
provided to the participants so that they can contact us if any doubt arises regarding the study.
uniquely for the researchers, after data collection, and during data analysis, participants' data files
(i.e., audio recordings and transcripts) will be stored securely, and data will not be used for any
Finally, participants will be informed of the minimum risk of participation related to the
exchange of confidential information and will be assured that their information will remain
private. Any type of communication in relation to this research will be done with transparency,
to guarantee the honest participation and data will not be manipulated to guarantee and to bias
any information.
Research focused on the field of language anxiety has allowed having knowledge of how
it affects students and the differences that every student has when learning a second language.
(Horwitz et al. 1986), Due to the problems presented, there will be a focus mainly on identifying
the factors that cause language anxiety in the oral productions of the sixth semester students of
the Bachelor degree in Foreign Languages, it becomes evident to develop in this section the
theoretical foundations of the categories of analysis involved in the present study. Furthermore,
communicative approach following the principal statements of Hymes (1972), and Brown (1994)
about oral production that constitutes a linguistic ability underlying said competence; and the
anxiety of the language that represents the central axis of the present study, explaining the main
differences for each type of anxiety such as general anxiety, FLA and Speaking anxiety based on
the principal theories established by Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986). Therefore, this work
will consider the following categories as the main reference for this theoretical framework:
based on the criteria and arguments established by Hymes (1972), Brown (1994), Richards
(2008), Oxford and Vásquez (2000), Rivers (1972), Ebsworth (1998), Krashen and Terrel
Foreign language anxiety considering the predominant theories of Horwitz, Horwitz, and
Cope (1986), MacIntyre and Gardner (1994b), Young (1990), Aida (1994), Alrabai, (2015),
Defined in the Framework of Reference for Languages as the set of "competences that
enable a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (2001). In other words, this
competence allows communicative situations to make sense and the student feels the need to use
the language to achieve something. In this way, it is ensured that the communicative situations
with which they work are close to the reality of the students and their needs. It is about teaching
development is the main objective of teaching a foreign language and is a fundamental part of
instrument for the construction of meanings. Therefore, this approach is not intended to deny the
competence. Thus, the objective of this teaching method is to train the learner for real written
and oral communication. According to Hymes (1972) all people have not only the ability to
speak but also the ability to communicate. Likewise, communicative competence refers to the
necessary linguistic knowledge that a speaker needs to interact and communicate effectively in
each situation.
Such knowledge not only includes knowledge about the language but also of a cultural
nature. Thus, a communicatively competent person is one who acquires the knowledge and
ability to use the language and interact with other people, understand them, and make themselves
communicative event reflects the interaction of all the participants and the context in which the
develops not when the grammatical rules of the language are handled (linguistic competence),
but when the person can determine when and when not to speak, and also about what to do, with
whom, where and in which way, it takes into account the attitudes, values , and motivations
related to the language, with its characteristics and uses; Likewise, it seeks the interrelation of
the language with other codes of communicative conduct (Hymes (1996), as cited in Tobón
(2004).
It is clear then that learning a foreign language involves not only knowing the
grammatical and lexical contents but also understanding how to use it in a real context, such as
the Foreign language program of the University of Pamplona where this project will be
implemented. For this reason, one of the main objectives is to develop in students not only the
Oral production
Oral production is one of the four language skills involved in the development of
communicative competence. This is generally one of the most complex because the speaker in a
very short space of time has to think about what he is going to say, how to say it, say it clearly,
and without making grammatical or pronunciation errors. (MCER, 2001). Additionally, one of
the difficulties lies in knowing not only the language as a code but also its pragmatic use,
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 18
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
depending on the communicative situation and the people to whom the speaker is addressing. In
general terms, the most common problems that arise in terms of oral production are frequently of
a linguistic or psychological nature. On the one hand, Brown (1994) and Richards (2008) assure
that some of the linguistic difficulties that students present during a communicative act are:
speaking at a slow pace, taking many breaks, using too many crutches, delaying organizing
ideas, expressing incomplete sentences, not joining ideas in an organized and coherent way,
making grammatical mistakes regularly, lacking the vocabulary necessary to communicate, not
using reduced forms of the language such as contractions, elisions, and syllabic reductions, and
not pronouncing words correctly with proper intonation. On the other hand, regarding
psychological problems, Vásquez (2000) states that one of the factors that negatively affect oral
production in students is the fear of making mistakes in front of their classmates and teachers,
which this may be due to the lack of a trustworthy environment in the classroom or to the use of
inadequate correction techniques by the teachers. Additionally, Oxford (2000) points out that the
most common psychological problems in learning a foreign language are anxiety, insecurity,
Considering the difficulties that the student faces in the learning process of oral
production, it is now necessary to conceptualize the most relevant aspects that describe it. In this
sense, Rivers (1972), points out that the discursive act is not only to select the message to be sent
and its encoding. Communication also involves, among other factors, the expression and
intention that the speaker has when sending his message. Thus, learning oral production involves
handling both grammatical, morphological, and phonological rules, as well as the cultural
context of the native speakers of the language to be learned. Generally, in the evaluation of oral
production, there are two approaches: The first of them has fluidity as an indicator of
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 19
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
development and the second, precision. Fluency refers to the capacity or ability of the speaker to
express himself and make himself understood in an understandable and reasonable way without
giving relevance to the correct use of grammar or pronunciation since what is important is the
content of the message. Precision, on the contrary, focuses on the correct and precise use of these
linguistic aspects. The fluidity-centered approach is based on two fundamental criteria (Krashen
& Terrel, 1983). The first perceives communication as the key means to develop oral production.
The second one states that the student should receive a few corrections unless his performance
hinders communication.
Thus, in this approach grammatical errors are of little importance especially when the
student is in the first levels of language learning. Ebsworth (1998) assures that when too much
emphasis is placed on correcting grammatical errors, the acquisition and natural development of
oral production can be interrupted. The precision-oriented approach is more concerned with the
correct use of grammar; therefore, the repetitive practice of structures is inevitable in learning the
language. However, over time this has been revalued by new theories that reject this assumption.
In this regard, Stern (1991) assures that the abandonment of this approach is due to its low long-
term effectiveness. The main advantage of the fluency approach is that the main purpose of
language learning is communication and not repetition and memorization exercises. However, a
grammatical errors that have not been corrected repeatedly appear, affecting the student's oral
production; fact that is not usually derived from the Precision approach since in this constant
feedback allows the student to be aware of their mistakes and be able to self-correct. The
ultimate goal of the development of oral production is to ensure that the student is able to express
himself when he needs and wants it, that he does it appropriately and that he is able to interact
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 20
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
orally during a communicative practice. Therefore, it is necessary to consider both approaches,
With the purpose of understanding the main characteristics of the intent for this project, it
is necessary to examine the criteria corresponding to the emotional issues and its incidence in the
academic learning process of English as a foreign language, focusing on its influence through the
development of oral productions. When analyzing the emotional issues that can be experimented
in the academic context at the moment of putting into practice what is known about a foreign
language it is required to understand the nature of the most common issue in a classroom:
anxiety.
Anxiety is experimented by many people, influencing their normal life due to its
symptoms that can be emotional, physical, cognitive, and behavioral; It is normally associated
with internal and external stimulus that appear as a defensive reaction. However, anxiety is
different for each situation, Horwitz, (2001) distinguishes anxiety of people who are generally
anxious in a variety of situations (trait anxiety) from those who are anxious only in specific
Considering the importance of anxiety and its influence in the academic context, it was
necessary to define it as a unique anxiety linked with the learning of a foreign language, being
the principal concern of some theorist as Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) who conceptualize
FLA as an specific anxiety, their studies have given to the emotional issues of the students more
relevance at the moment of investigate learning; in the educational context the student is the
learning a new language and the influence of several factors over the learner’s abilities.
Throughout their study they established an instrument that was widely accepted to
measure classroom anxiety due to several failures at the moment of establishing a clear
relationship between anxiety and foreign language achievement (Tran, 2012 p.70) this
instrument was the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS). Although some
researchers have questioned its construct validity. In relation with this scale, they established
anxiety, 3. fear of negative evaluation. Within the academic context these anxieties predominate
in interpersonal interactions necessary for the learning process, however Aida (1994) (as cited in
Dewaele, 2017), assumed they were the three only components of FLA and identified four
factors causing anxiety within a foreign language classroom environment: 1. speech anxiety and
Conversely Young (1990) listed six potential factors of FLA: 1. personal and inter-
personal anxieties, 2. learner beliefs about language learning, 3. instructor beliefs about language
Investigators such as Sparks and Ganschow (1991, 1993a, 1993b, 2007) also questioned
that: ‘‘while the components of FLA communication apprehension and fear of negative
evaluation are closely related to FLA, test anxiety is likely to be a general anxiety problem rather
than being specific to foreign language learning.’’ (Tran, 2012 p.72) to justify this MacIntyre
(1989) found that test anxiety contributed to the general anxiety factor and not to the
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 22
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
communicative anxiety factor, thus suggesting that test anxiety is a general problem rather than
being specific to the foreign language classroom, But Horwitz (2010) (as cited in Tran, 2012
p.72) clarified her position that FLA is related to communication apprehension, fear of negative
evaluation and test anxiety rather than being composed of them as “misinterpreted” by Aida
(1994).
Campbell (1991) affirmed that the existing of FLA was only an excuse of students who
did not want to participate in language classes, but Chen (2015) argued that language anxiety is
not an excuse for students not to enjoy language classrooms and that teachers should be alert to
negative anxiety effects on students’ language learning process. Alrabai, (2015) consider FLA a
(Kráľová, 2016), and Clement (1980) stated that FLA is a complex construct that deals with
these statements, anxiety in education needs to be analyzed from the psychological point given
that it affects the learner’s emotions causing them nervousness, fear, mental blocks and
insecurity.
MacIntyre and Gardner (1994), defined FLA as the feeling of tension and apprehension
specifically associated with second or foreign language contexts, including speaking, listening,
and learning, or the worry and negative emotional reaction arousal when learning or using a
second or foreign language. Horwitz et al. (1986) stated that language anxiety is related to
speaking more than any other skill, also students affirm that speaking is the most challenging
skill for them and where anxiety is most frequent. Communication is the principal goal when
learning a new language, but the obstacles that the learner will find can be an important motive
similar the reason is that each person has his own way of learning and confront the emotions
something that produces an effect and the factor as something that contributes to the production
of an effect’’ (Kráľová, Petrova, (2017). The main causes are related with the students’
perceptions, they report that their biggest fear is being ridiculed when talking, this is because
and ego, which they have formed in their first language as reasonable and intelligent individuals”
(Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986). In order to identify adult students’ beliefs about language
learning, Horwitz (1983) created an instrument called the Beliefs about Language Learning
Inventory (BALLI).
Interaction in class is guided by a teacher and he can also contribute to students’ anxiety,
for Ohata (2005) teachers’ perceptions play an important role in learners’ FLA as teacher is the
person in the classroom who can regulate the atmosphere, search for the signs of anxiety and
help students overcome it. That is why it is important that the teacher become a person who
inspires the students and develop activities where they can feel secure and without stress,
creating a confident space is useful for the development of the different activities.
Also learning a new language requires memorize a lot of words that help students express
their ideas when doing an oral presentation or for interacting with people, in relation with this
idea Tadjouri, (2017, p.4) explain that ‘‘students hesitate to speaking the foreign language
because of the limited amount of vocabulary that they have to express their thoughts and views’’
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 24
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
the lack of vocabulary can increase student’s anxiety because they are unable communicate
properly. Thus, they need more preparation and practice to be well prepared.
As cited in Vacas (2018), speaking anxiety can also be expressed by several symptoms
observed, including fast heartbeat, clammy hands, nausea, dry mouth, trembling voice, leg
2.Behavioral symptoms: students avoid speaking and prefer to keep silence, do not
express their views, and feel embarrassed and insecure when talking. (Tadjouri, 2017)
3. Psychological symptoms: Kanar (2011, as cited in Tadjouri, 2017) stated that students
with speaking anxiety experienced disorganized thoughts and negative self-talk, feel inadequacy
During the learning of a new foreign language, what is sought is that students acquire
skills in the development of basic skills, in other words, that they learn to cope when listening,
writing, reading, and, of course, speaking, the latter, also known as oral production, is one of the
most important skills for a proper application of the language in any context. It is relevant to
highlight that language anxiety is one of the main factors that affect student development in
language anxiety is a psychological state created by the student as a defense against the academic
environment where he is learning which encourages the study of this issue to bring future
investigations to focus on strategies that can help the overcoming of this problem. Also, these
Communicative competence
appropriately in a given speech community; this implies respecting a set of rules that includes
both those of grammar and the other levels of linguistic description (lexicon, phonetics, and
semantics) and the rules of language use, related to the socio-historical and cultural context in
Defined as the capacity that the student has to use his knowledge on the formal and
the idea that the student learns the language, instead of just practicing a grammatical structure,
instead, through practice the student is forced to master the grammatical structure. (Hymes,
1972)
Oral Production
and grammar of the target language but also sociocultural and pragmatic knowledge. It consists
of a series of micro-skills, such as knowing how to contribute information and opinions, agree or
Anxiety is a problem that affects several people especially when they have to interact
construct consisting of many variables”. Commonly this issue is associated with a mental threat,
This term differs from the general anxiety however it is more specific only experienced
by Foreign or Second language learners, this due to the inevitable practice of the language that is
(young, 1992) from other side Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) define it as a distinct complex
Speaking anxiety
This is a subcategory of the foreign language anxiety, where the learner becomes anxious
when speaking in public. The biggest fear of a language learner is making mistakes; students do
not want to be ashamed in front of their partners and most of them assumed that when speaking a
foreign language mistakes are forbidden and are a synonym of failure, which increase speaking
anxiety. According to Hanifa (2018) it exists several sources that cause speaking anxiety such as
cognitive factors which can involve the familiarity with the topic, affective factors related with
feelings or attitudes towards the topic and/or interlocutors and performance factors which can
Spielberger, (1983) Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986), Young (1990), and Aida’s (1994) work,
who approached to describe the nature and characteristics of anxiety and its relationship with
student’s success.
It was found that anxiety was a prevailing feeling in Foreign or Second language students
which highly influenced students’ performance; thus, researchers as MacIntyre (1995), Sparks
and Ganschow (1995), Argaman and Abu-Rabia (2002) investigate the effects of FLA in
students’ achievement, these studies found a significant relationship between language anxiety
and the communications skills therefore MacIntyre (1995) argued against Sparks and Ganschow
‘‘indicating that anxiety arousal could act as a causal agent in creating individual differences in
instruments to assess the level of anxiety in the students, and researchers such as Gardner et al.
(1979), MacIntyre and Gardner (1989), Horwitz et al. (1986), evaluating the level of anxiety in
was the scale developed by Horwitz et al. (1986), aiming to assess communication apprehension,
test anxiety and fear of negative evaluation associated with language anxiety, which was highly
Thus, this section briefly summarizes some studies carried out in the study area related to
language anxiety in oral productions that are used as antecedents of the present work at the
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 28
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
international, national, and local levels. Therefore, two categories have been considered as main
references for this part, firstly the causes and influence of FLA in the process of learning a
foreign language are examined and secondly it was considered the importance to analyze the
main causes and effects of anxiety among English students during their oral productions.
2.3.1 Main causes and influence of foreign language anxiety (FLA) in EFL students.
considerable number of learners express that they have felt anxiety in a moment of the learning
process. Studies conducted by some researchers such as Alrabai (2014), Oda and Ali (2013),
Kamaruddin and Abdullah (2015), Szyszka, (2017) analyze the causes and influences of anxiety
in the foreign language learning process and have found a negative correlation in it.
Alrabai (2014), Oda and Ali (2013), examined in their studies the levels of anxiety that
EFL students experiment when learning and participating in class. These studies have revealed
that the participants presented high levels of anxiety associated with communication anxiety,
comprehension apprehension, and negative attitudes toward English class, being their main
sources of anxiety. Considering these results Alrabai (2014) considers the teachers’ role as an
important mediator in alleviating language anxiety among learners. Likewise, Oda and Ali
(2013) consider the external factors such as the classroom atmosphere and teachers as the main
cause of anxiety due to its role of controller or dominator; in consequence, students usually feel
nervous or oppressed.
research design to investigate the levels of English language anxiety, the specific skills in which
students find themselves the most anxious, its causal factors, and strategies to cope and alleviate
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 29
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
FLA. In this study it was analyzed the influence of anxiety over listening, writing, speaking, and
reading comprehension, and in their literature review there were considered some authors such as
Christenberry (2001) and Riasati (2011) who stated that listening is a problematic skill that
causes anxiety due to three reasons: first, the speed in which the speakers produces his/her
utterances; second, the different intonation which makes language comprehension difficult, and
In relation with speaking skills Hadziosmanovic (2012), (as cited in Kamaruddin and
Abdullah, 2015) expresses “that speaking in the ESL is not exclusively the source of the anxiety,
but that speaking in front of the class is”; therefore, it implies that students can feel anxious due
to the lack of vocabulary and problems with grammar rules and pronunciation at the moment of
speak and also cognitive difficulties related with their fear of failure and making mistakes.
Rajab et. al. (2012) and Mohd. Zin & Rafik-Galea (2010) (as cited in Kamaruddin and
Abdullah, 2015) found that reading skill is less experimented among Malaysian students. This
suggests that while presenting a reading task, students have more control of their emotions
because there is no pressure, however it can be presented when students need more time to finish
the reading task (Kamaruddin and Abdullah, 2015; Loghmani & Ghonsooly, 2012)
Finally Kamaruddin and Abdullah, (2015) cited three past studies on language anxiety
and writing skill conducted by Ucgun (2011), Rankin- Brown (2006) and Brouwer (2012),
demonstrating that “writing anxiety have influenced students’ language learning regardless of the
different stages or ability (i.e. beginner or advanced language learner), Hence, writing anxiety
may also be an outcome of various factors that create difficulty in the process of learning and
producing a writing piece in the target language which is English”. Therefore, writing skill is
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 30
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
also an important source of FLA however it must be studied from a different perspective since
the development of such activities involves different conditions. According to this studies
anxiety can be experimented in a different way depending on each skill, due to the way in which
they are developed, it can be supposed that a task like an oral presentation can be more difficult
because the student has to be in front of his classmates in accordance with this idea the authors
stated that sometimes students prefer to remain silent instead of risking humiliation or
embarrassment due to their mistakes, also the teacher is a source of anxiety because of his
personality, and some feelings like fear or discomfort can appear; Gałajda, (2017) stated that
“anxious learners become unwilling to communicate with other students and the teacher and
avoid communication in general. This might lead to insufficient language practice and
consequently poor academic results”; hence, it is important to work in making the classroom and
space where students feel confident, and the attitude of the teacher must be good and positive.
On the other hand, in writing or reading skills anxiety can be controlled, students can
learn how to deal with these feelings implementing some strategies that sometimes help them, in
their study Kamaruddin and Abdullah, (2015) found relaxation and preparation as the most
coping strategies used by highly anxious students. Other findings revealed that the majority of
the university students had moderate level of self-perceived anxiety in an English language
Conversely, in her book Szyszka, (2017) identified the internal and external causes of
anxiety which can affect students’ performance such as learner beliefs, self-perception and
competitiveness as internal causes, also this causes include others established in previous studies
of Horwitz, et al. (1986), which are communication apprehension, and fear of negative
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 31
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
evaluation thus, it can verify the results presented in their study. Also, Szyszka, (2017) cited
Young, (1991) and Ohata, (2005) who established the external factors affecting levels of
language anxiety which refer to instructors’ beliefs about learning and teaching, instructor-
learner interactions, and classroom procedures and language testing. The statements found in this
book show a similarity with the studies analyzed above, which has revealed that most of the
main causes that produce anxiety in students' learning skills are correlated.
2.3.2 Main causes and effects of anxiety among English students during their oral
productions.
classroom, it is necessary to mention some factors and definitions about anxiety in oral
communication and its development. Furthermore, in this context, it is worth highlighting many
related to language learning in the classroom that arises from the uniqueness of the language
learning process (Horwitz, Horwitz & Cope, 1986), apprehension a communication is the level
of fear or anxiety in an individual associated with real or anticipated interactions with other
threatening information processing system that allows the mobilization of preventive actions in
advance”. In other words, a student is likely to feel anxious in a situation where he faces an oral
production, for which he does not feel prepared, either because he does not have sufficient
grammatical support or if the environment is not suitable for him. This emotion can positively
and negatively affect the student since in small amounts it can enhance the acquisition making it
more effective, but, on the other hand, if it is excessive it can interfere with the understanding of
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 32
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
a topic affecting the assimilation of concepts, the elaboration of complex messages and memory
to remember vocabulary. In addition to anxiety, there are other emotions that influence learning,
so it is necessary for the student to learn to accept and control them so that they do not become
an obstacle. Research carried out in this field by numerous researchers has also supported the
fact that language anxiety is one of the important factors hindering the learning of a foreign
language and negatively influencing the performance of language learners. In general, the
findings reached by many researchers such as Horwitz et al. (1986), MacIntyre (1989), Young
(1991), Aida (1994), MacIntyre (1995), Saito and Samimy (1996), Coulombe (1998), Horwitz
(2001) concluded that language anxiety has a large negative effect on the performance of second
language learners; Anxious learners perform less well than those who experience less anxiety;
there is a negative correlation between language anxiety and the marks obtained in the foreign
language course; despite the learner’s best efforts, anxiety negatively influences their academic
success. However, other researchers have examined the effects of language anxiety, but in a
more specific way they have dealt with its consequences on the four language skills, namely
written production, written comprehension, oral comprehension, and oral production. Among
these skills, it was found that speaking was the skill causing more anxiety in learners’
performance: it turns out to be the most problematic concerning the development of anxiety
(Horwitz et al, 1986; Price, 1991, cited by Philips, 1992; Young, 1991; Young, 1992; Cheng et
al, 1986; al., 1999). Indeed, research shows that learners experience the most language anxiety
during speaking lessons and mainly when they have to speak in the target language, that is to say
in the foreign language that they learn. Some things like self-confidence (low self-confidence
creates more anxiety), the possibility of failure (even a small possibility is enough to avoid
talking), past failures (the major effect of bad experiences in the past), negative evaluation (the
experiences anxiety during the next activities) are reasons for anxiety in speaking (Cheng et al.
1999, p. 436). Since the anxiety experienced in speaking is mostly manifested as a real problem
and since speaking has always been considered “the paragon of mastery of a foreign language”
(Defays, 2003, p. 244), It is the language anxiety felt during speaking that was the main object of
our study. Therefore, as mentioned above, communicating in foreign languages is not always as
easy and ideal as one might think. Unfortunately, classes are often full of silence and the teacher
is the only one speaking, while the students they listen. For this reason and thanks to the studies
carried out, the focus of the investigation will allow us to determine the factors by which it is
happening.
Taken into above, this review of related literature on FLA shows that FLA is the main
issue that students had to face with when having contact with a new language; however,
researches have helped to have a better understanding of this specific anxiety based on these
studies it has been found that is still needed more confirmatory studies based in other
components that could expand our knowledge about this academic issue taking into account all
the context surrounding the students. These studies highlight the negative effects of FLA over
the learners and shows the well-known instrument designed by Horwitz et al. (1986) that has
been used to measure the anxiety levels among language learners. For that reason, this study will
(1990) to make a complete search of the main factors affecting student’s communication. Also
considering that the language program of the University of Pamplona needs further studies to
understand in a deep way the students’ perception while learning a second language.
Methodology
In this section, it is presented the methodology that will be implemented throughout the
research in order to find and provide significant results that can contribute to the academic
context. This section is divided into four categories which are Methodological approach and
Design where it explains the type of research and design that better adapts to the problem, also
the setting where this investigation will be applied, the population participants and sample which
is very important because the participants will allow finding the results to this research and
finally the Data collection techniques and instruments that will be applied with the consent of the
participants.
In order to capture the diverse range of subjects’ experiences, the mixed approach was
provides a more complete understanding of a research problem than either approach alone.”
(Creswell. 2014) Also, a mixed research is defined by Creswell (2014) as “approach to inquiry
involving collecting both quantitative and qualitative data integrating the two forms of data, and
using distinct designs that may involve philosophical assumptions and theoretical frameworks.”
(p. 32) In other words, in this approach qualitative and quantitative methods are developed in one
study to have a broad overview of the problem that is being investigated and data collection and
Considering that the research objective is to recognize which negative factors are
associated with the development of FLA in the oral competence development in EFL learners, it
was considered to develop an Exploratory Sequential Design (DEXPLOS) since it better fits to
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 35
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
this research, this design consists of two phases, in the first phase qualitative data is collected and
analyzed and in the second phase quantitative data is collected and analyzed (Sampieri,
According to Sampieri, Fernandez and Baptista, (2012) It is useful for those who seek to
explore a phenomenon, but who also want to expand the results. A great advantage of
DEXPLOS is that it is relatively easier to implement because the stages are clear and
differentiated. Thus, based on the objectives of this research the participants are strongly
associated with the situation that is being studied, and the use of both approaches (qualitative and
Otherwise, the chosen design is defined by Creswell (2014) as “a design in which the
researcher first begins by exploring with qualitative data and analysis and then uses the findings
in a second quantitative phase, and the second database builds on the results of the initial
database.” (p. 276), with this design better measurements can be developed, and a few
individuals can be used in the first phase to see if data can be generalized to a large sample of a
population (in quantitative phase) (Creswell (2014). Additionally, there are two design methods
according to the purpose of the study which are derivative and comparative. For this research it
has been considered the comparative method as the most appropriate design to carry out,
considering the explanation by Sampieri, Fernandez and Baptista, (2012) in this case, in the first
phase, qualitative data is collected and analyzed to explore a phenomenon, generating a database;
Later, in the second stage, quantitative data is collected and analyzed and another database is
obtained (this last phase is not completely built on the platform of the first, as in the derivative
mode, but the initial results are taken into account: errors in the choice of topics, complex areas
This means that this design provides enough understanding of the specific case stated
which is anxiety from general points of view, and it helps to know in depth the main causes of
this issue and come to clearer conclusions that allow future researches to establish strategies that
3.2 Setting
This mixed-method research is carried out at the University of Pamplona, located in the
Norte de Santander department in Colombia. Which has three university campuses in the main
headquarters; it also has offices in the municipality of Villa del Rosario and in the city of Cúcuta,
as well as several Regional Centers for Distance Education (CREAD) in different cities of the
country. The University of Pamplona was born in 1960, as a private institution, under the
leadership of the priest, José Rafael Faría Bermúdez. In 1970 it was converted into a
Departmental Public University, by Decree No. 0553 of August 5, 1970, and in 1971 the
No. 1550 of August 13. It should be noted that this institution has forty-six academic programs
divided into seven faculties, which are the following: the Faculty of Arts and Humanities, the
Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, the Faculty of Sciences, the Faculty of Economic and Business
Sciences, the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, the Faculty of Health and finally we
distinguish the Faculty of Education, where this research is developed; This faculty is divided
into three departments that are in fact subdivided into five academic programs, inside this
programs it is found the foreign language program which offers the bachelor degree of Foreign
The population to be analyzed in this research focuses on students of the Bachelor degree
in Foreign Languages English - French from the University of Pamplona who are studying the
sixth semester of English as a foreign language, whose ages vary between 19 and 24 years; the
linguistic level is B2.2 based on the hourly intensity that the CEFR suggests to achieve this
proficiency.
In the following table you can see the time relationship adopted by the Bachelor of
Foreign Languages program of the University of Pamplona, according to the level of hours
COMMON DEGREE IN
EUROPEAN HOURLY FOREIGN HOURLY
FRAME OF INTENSITY LANGUAGES INTENSITY
REFERENCES ENGLISH
FOR LANGUAGES FRENCH
A1 Elementary English 128
I A1.
A2 180 – 200 Elementary English 240
II. A2.
B1 350 – 400 Intermediate 352
English I B1,1.
Intermediate 464
English II. B1,2.
B2 500 - 600 Advanced English I 576
B2,1.
Advanced English II 704
B2,2.
C1 700 - 800 Academic Text 784
Production in
English. C1,1.
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 38
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Anglophone Culture 848
and Thought. C1,2.
Anglophone 912
Literature. C1,2.
Table 1 Comparison of hourly intensities of the CEFR and the Degree.
Regarding the selection of the participants of this study and bearing in mind that this
research is a mixed study it is decided to carry out a purposeful sampling with six individuals,
this means that “researchers intentionally select individuals and sites to learn or understand the
central phenomenon” (Creswell, 2012 p. 206). In other words, the participants that best relate
with the characteristics of our study are selected to participate in the investigation. For the first
instance, it was considered the Homogeneous Sampling which is a sampling where the
researcher purposefully samples individuals or sites based on membership in a subgroup that has
defining characteristics. To use this procedure, you need to identify the characteristics and find
individuals or sites that possess it” (Creswell, 2012). Thus, considering those individuals in this
research make part of a specific group which is the sixth semester of the foreign language
program where they share specific characteristics related with our main issue which is the factors
For the phases of exploration and identification of the problematic situation of this
qualitative investigation, four instruments and techniques of data collection were used:
observation, field diary, semi structured interviews, and a self-development test. Then, the
According to Hernández et al. (2004) this instrument recognizes and understands the
processes and relationships between subjects and situations and the patterns that develop within
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 39
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
them. Likewise, this technique allows to extend the personal perceptions of the researcher on the
forms of organization, the actions of the participants, their needs, and the characteristics of the
groups, linking patterns such as the frequency of interactions. (Hernández et al., 2004).
The first moment of observation of this research aimed to identify the problematic
situations in the classroom of the intermediate Advanced English II in relation to oral production.
recognize the anxiety attitudes experienced when students speak in the target language.
Other moments of observation were carried out during the sessions, with the purpose of
evidencing the change or impact of this in the study population. The different events or situations
The field diary was the technique through which the researchers took the pertinent notes
of the observation processes to explore, and identify, the information collected for the research.
Martínez (2007) proposes three fundamental elements for field diaries, which were taken up in
this investigation. The first, the description: detailed and objective descriptive writing of the
context in which the investigated problem situation develops. The second, argumentation:
deepen the situations and relationships that have been described. And finally, interpretation: the
relationship of the facts with the experience of the investigator to understand and give an
The reflective journal allowed researchers to analyze, and interpret the information
collected in the observations required during the research. According to Lindroth (2014) Journals
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 40
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
have been particularly effective in encouraging reflective thought. Also, Krol (1996) stated that
journal writing “is an approach that fosters reflection, and it is an effective source of dialogue
between student and teacher. In other words, reflective journals have many positive benefits that
can help understand what happens during the observation and why it happens and to have a deep
In order to analyze the experiences during the observation, it was considered Schön’s,
(1983) framework named “Reflection before, during and after a learning process” as the most
appropriate model to conduct the reflective process. Also having into account that field notes are
considered that this model allows mixing the data collected inside the field notes and the
reflective journal in that order it was proposed a chart where Schon’s model will be developed.
This instrument is defined by Hernández et al. (2004) as “a meeting to talk and exchange
information between one person (the interviewer) and another (the interviewee)” (p. 403), which
was done with all the students in the sample at this level at the foundation. Hence, two semi-
structured interviews were carried out. The first interview aims at understanding how students
feel when performing oral presentations inside the classroom, it is considered the atmosphere of
the class and the influence of teachers and classmates. The second interview was implemented to
know the influence that FLA has over student’s academic performance. Additionally, these semi-
structured interviews allowed informants to freely express their opinions on their own terms. In
this way, semi-structured interviews can provide reliable and comparable qualitative data.
Elizalde (2018). Therefore, semi-structured interviews were used to identify the students’
perceptions and the factors that cause foreign language anxiety in the student’s oral production.
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 41
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
3.4.6 Test: Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS)
With the purpose of collecting quantitative data, it was adopted and adapted the Foreign
language classroom anxiety scale which was introduced by Horwitz and Cope (1986) as an
instrument to measure anxiety levels that consist of thirty-three items, it was consider using this
scale because it has been widely accepted and has provided more conscious results.
In order to organize, execute and keep under observation all the activities that were
developed it is important to establish a timeline that helped with the planning of the time because
timelines are commonly used as effective tools which are simple and accessible.
In the following chart it can be find the activities to be developed during the developing
of this research:
Data collection process has been carried out based on the timeline of activities, which has
been modified due to some delays such as the permission that the teacher in charge of the class
To start this data collection process, it was important to send a permission letter via email
to the teacher from the group that would be observed. There were some delays to start the
observation due to a meeting that the professor had the day the class would be observed, and it is
considered that the teacher has many compromises and sometimes emails are not checked
frequently, for this reason, the first observation was implemented in the third week after exams
(Oct 26th – 30th). Also, it was proposed to observe twice a week (Fridays and Saturdays) but on
Saturdays there has not been taught because the professor has given this day to the students for
In order to cover the class to share the main ideas of the project with the students, it was
asked the teacher to allow the researchers to present themselves at the end of the class and
explain the process that was being developed. Students were attentive and collaborated with the
process and the email with the consent letter was sent the next week in order to ask them to allow
the researchers to make them part of the data collection. However, it was necessary to call some
of them and remind them that they had to respond to the letter sent through email and
considering those who answered positively were selected six of them to be part of the project.
At the moment only three participants have answered the first semi-structured interview
google forms they have more freedom to answer at their rhythm and with no pressure.
In relation to the class observations, it has been implemented in the reflective journals
mentioned in the data collection instruments’ section, also the observation protocol with the field
diary has been taken into account with the purpose of taking notes about what is observed. These
instruments have been very useful because they allow us to recover the information and analyze
it considering all the information collected because classes have been very dynamic due to the
activities developed by the teacher because during the two observations the topic of the classes
has been based on doing oral productions. For example, in the first observation which was about
presenting a representative character of Halloween, it was noticed that students had a previous
preparation of the presentation which decreased the anxiety levels, in contrast during the second
observation about presenting an invention some anxiety levels were noticed because it could be
analyzed why these emotions were experimented, for example, due to the reading made while
presenting the exposition and pronunciation mistakes. Also, it has been relevant to the fact that
the professor encourages his students to talk, he always congratulates them which is a very
The third observation was proposed by the English professor in charge, he invited the
researchers to observe the development of the exams that were carried out during the eleventh
week (Nov 9th - 14th) in which it was allowed researchers to observe the behavior shown by the
students during a spontaneous conversation which also would have them under pressure.
However, it could not be observed because the professor did not reply to the email of permission.
observing the classes to obtain a complete source of data to understand the issue that is being
studied.
During the data collection process it was necessary to develop some protocols to
implement a formal process, which consisted of sending one letter of consent to the teacher in
charge of the class that would be observed, and another one to the participants selected, to
implement two semi-structured interviews and one test which were previously validated; on the
other hand it was necessary to implement other data collection instruments such as reflective
In order to understand the process carried out, the instruments used will be described
below:
These instruments were created to formally request the teacher in charge of the course his
consent to observe the classes, (Appendix A ) and to request the students their participation in
the research. These letters contained relevant information of the research such as the general
objective, the purpose, and the way in which the data will be collected. On the other hand, it was
explained the importance of their participation and how the information collected will be used,
this means that the ethical considerations established in the project were also informed.
The letters were sent via email, and with the purpose of ensuring the voluntary
participation of the students, it was requested them to sign and reply the email containing the
same letter. Finally, all the participants confirmed their participation with their signature.
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 48
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
3.7.2 Selection of participants
With respect to the selection of participants, the purposeful sampling was implemented to
fulfil the requirements of this process. This means that after meeting the participants in the first
observation, six of the students who fit the requirements of the research were chosen.
In order to have their permission, it was necessary to ask them for their email with the
purpose of sending a letter of consent that they had to sign and send it back if they would accept
design of these interviews consisted of asking the participants open questions related to their
English learning process. (Appendix E) In this sense, the objective of the first interview was to
know the perceptions that foreign language learners have towards oral productions; that is why
the questions were focused on the perceptions about the oral productions and the environment of
the class. The second semi-structured interview objective was focused on discovering the main
causes of foreign language anxiety, reason why it was pertinent to include questions focused on
the emotions associated with the anxiety experienced while talking in class. (Appendix F)
Furthermore, these questionnaires were implemented through Google Forms due to the
facility that this platform offers and due to the virtuality, that we have had to face academically
this year. Also, as previously stated the questions asked in this research were used in the
Taking into account that this research is based on a mixed design, it was necessary to
implement an instrument that allowed to collect quantitative data, and considering the purpose of
this study about adopting the FLCAS created by Horwitz and Cope (1986), that helps to measure
At the beginning it was proposed to implement the original scale; however, after
analyzing it was noticed that some items were not related to the context and the objectives of the
research. For this reason, the scale was adapted to collect the data, and later uploaded in Google
Forms to use the Likert’s scale format for the participants to answer it. (Appendix G)
Because the FLCAS was designed by Horwitz et al. (1986) it was important to respect
copyright, so taking into account the ethical considerations, it was created a letter requesting the
permission to adopt and adapt the scale (Appendix H ). The letter was sent via email,
containing information about the researchers and the investigation that is being developed
(objectives, purpose, setting, participants); also, there were attached those changes that were
made in the items of the scale, at which she answers allowing the researchers to implement her
scale. (Appendix I)
Regarding the validation of the aforementioned instruments, once these were created,
reviewed and corrected, it was created a format where the summary of the research was attached
researchers and the tutor of the investigation, who reviewed it and sent the comments that
suggested the corrections to be implemented in some of those questions. After obtaining the
Regarding the data collection it was also implemented the class observations that helped
to know the participants and to observe their behavior and their oral performance in a real
context. In order to access these classes, first of all it was sent the permission letter to the
teacher. After receiving the positive answer, it was asked him the link to get into the class.
However, some classes have not been able to be observed due to some problems that the teacher
in charge of the course has had. These situations have not affected the data collection process
As a way of taking notes about what is being observed during the class it was
summary of the activities developed in the class. The notes made in this instrument are taken in
an online google document because it facilitates the asynchronous note-taking and allows to
The observation protocol was created based on the naturalistic observation which is a
type of observation that involves observing by studying the spontaneous behavior of participants
in natural surroundings. So, this observation protocol has been a register of the students’
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 51
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
participation made without any manipulation and the researchers have been limited to observe
and take notes of what has been observed in the activities of the classes. The instrument was
created by the researchers and it contains the information of the students who participate and the
corrections or comments that the teacher makes after their oral productions. (Appendix C)
In the same way, following the research timeline of activities, four week-journals were
carried out, this reflective journal was implemented through online google documents, and
consisted of a chart based on Schön’s, (1983) framework named “Reflection before, during and
after a learning process”. It consists of three entries (before the experience, during the
experience, after the experience) that allowed to describe the process that was developed, and the
With the purpose of repairing the information collected, each week the researchers met by
means of a video call in order to socialize and organize the data collected during the class and the
Data analysis in mixed studies is based on the method design that is being used,
considering that this study follows an exploratory sequential design for the qualitative data to be
analyzed separately from the quantitative one. For this sense, Onwuegbuzie and Combs (2010)
stated that researchers have to analyze mixed data (both the quantitative and qualitative) as well
as to integrate the results that stem from both the quantitative and qualitative analysis “in a
coherent and meaningful way that yields strong meta-inferences (i.e., inferences from qualitative
coherent wholes)”
The data validation process has been conducted through “triangulation” which is an
approach used by researchers for analyzing the data collected by different means. For this sense,
triangulation is a process of combining data from different sources to study a particular social
phenomenon (Hales, 2010); also, Johnson & Christensen (2008) defined it as a validation
approach based on the convergence of results obtained by using multiple investigators, methods,
In order to better define what this term is about, Denzin (1978) defined four types of
triangulation:
1. Data triangulation: it uses a variety of data sources including time, space, and
people in a study. This method is very reliable due to its help to corroborate findings and
compensate for possible weaknesses within the data with the strengths of other data, thereby
observer, researcher or data analyst in a study. The ability to confirm findings across
enhance the credibility of the findings. Investigator triangulation is particularly important for
examining a situation“Formando
or phenomenon. It analyzes
líderes para la construcción a situation/phenomenon
de un nuevo país en paz” from different
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 53
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
perspectives, through different lenses, with different questions in mind. The different theories or
hypotheses do not have to be similar or compatible; in fact, the more divergent they are, the more
situation or phenomenon. The intention is to decrease the deficiencies and biases that come from
any single method. In other words, the strengths of one method may compensate for the
weaknesses of another.
kinds of information, data triangulation was considered as the most suitable method to analyze
what was collected and also to corroborate for flaws in the gathering process with the strengths
of what other instruments could have provided; in that sense, the validity and reliability of the
Taking into consideration this study followed the Exploratory sequential design
(DEXPLOS), data were analyzed in the same order they were collected: first qualitative data
were organized in a google document since it facilitates the collective work, putting all the
questions in order with the respective answers; then, the information was coded following the
concept of Inductive codes that stated that codes are established by directly examining the data,
and this codes were organized in tables as it is explain in the following section:
First, qualitative data was analyzed (two semi-structured interviews) in which four
Anxiety, Negative effects in the oral Communication, and Strategies to cope with Foreign
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 54
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Language Anxiety; furthermore, these categories helped to discover the perceptions that the sixth
semester students had about their oral proficiency (first interview) and the reasons that cause
foreign language anxiety during their oral performances in the class (second interview).
In this sense, preliminary results will be presented following the categories previously
established:
The derived results from the two semi-structured interviews succeeded in giving a
preliminary understanding of the sources of students’ language anxiety. The findings from the
two semi-structured interviews showed some of the statements that are indicative of relatively
high levels of language anxiety among the sixth semester students. These statements are divided
in two subcategories related with the internal and external factors as identified by Szyszka
(2017): for example, these causes can affect students’ performance due to learner beliefs, self-
perception and competitiveness defined as internal causes. The main causes found are
highlighted in Table 3.
Symptoms of“Formando
ForeignlíderesLanguage Anxiety.
para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 55
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
In this category, it was found one subcategory related with communication apprehension
related to trait, context, audience, and situation (McCroskey, 2001) as well as codes found in the
The derived results from the two semi-structured interviews succeeded in giving a
preliminary understanding of the negative effects found in the participants’ answers which were
related with one subcategory related with test anxiety defined by Bögels et al., 2010 (as cited in
Szyszka (2017) cited two models that explain the relationship between language anxiety
and language learning strategies (LLS). The first model related with the Socio-educational
Model of Second Language Learning proposed by Gardner, Tremblay, & Masgoret (1997) states
that motivation is a factor triggering the use of language learning strategies, including
pronunciation learning strategies, which together with motivation and language aptitude directly
contribute to language achievement. However, this model suggests that using a vast number of
The second method is the Grounded-Theory Model of English Learning proposed by Yan
and Horwitz (2008) suggesting that “an ineffective use of LLS results in higher anxiety reported
by learners.” These models were taken into consideration by the researchers in order to provide
In relation with the strategies implemented by the students to cope with anxiety it was
found that many of them used some techniques of distraction which are described in table 6.
The quantitative data was organized considering the categories established when adapting
the FLCAS in three tables where the categories are grouped with their respective questions and
then the percentages of each question were analyzed using the graphics provided by google
table 7 contains six questions about test anxiety; table 8 contains five questions related to the fear
the nature of students’ language anxiety, which helped to discover the levels of anxiety that the
sixth semester students had. Finally, data were triangulated with the theories that guide this
research.
With the purpose of carrying out the data analysis, it was necessary to create codes and
categories that helped to organize and understand the data collected; in this sense, coding is
defined by Johnson & Christensen (2008) as the process of marking segments of data (usually
text data) with symbols, descriptive words, or category names, this codes are divided in (1)
inductive codes, which are those that qualitative researchers traditionally generate by directly
examining the data during the coding process (2) In vivo codes, those that use the words of the
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 58
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
research participants, (3) A priori codes that were developed before examining the current data,
In order to access the qualitative information easily, a matrix containing the information
related to the interviews was created. Firstly, data was classified by considering the topic of the
interview, the number of questions and the answers provided by participants. The process of
organizing the information was carried out manually and pseudonyms were used with the
purpose of protecting the participants anonymity furthermore color coding was implemented
according to the codes that were established by directly examining the data (Inductive codes)
RESULTS
In this chapter all the results concerning the factors that cause foreign language anxiety
were addressed taking into consideration the research questions established for this study dealing
with: the way FLA is manifested in students’ oral communication, the main causes of FLA in
oral performances, the way FLA affects the academic achievement and the strategies
categories and subcategories that shed a light on the students’ perceptions considering the
phenomenon under study. These categories include the following: (1) Sources of FLA, takes into
consideration the internal and external factors affecting the students’ language learning; (2)
the students’ academic and cognitive abilities; (3) Negative effects in the oral communication;
related to test anxiety and fear of negative evaluation (4) Strategies to cope with FLA that some
of the students use in situations of anxiety in the classroom and the strategies that are considered
as helpful in alleviating this anxiety. Therefore, students’ statements are quoted verbatim from
the original answers provided in the two semi-structured interviews, so some statements may not
The first of these findings is related to the students’ internal factors towards the oral
presentation. According to Szyszka, (2017) certain internal factors related might play a role in
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 60
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
the emergence of feeling anxious and uneasiness towards the process of speaking in the target
language. In this regard, three code findings emerged from the internal factors (fear of speaking
in front of a class, lack of confidence, and negative emotions). In which and according to the
statements of the participants the main internal factor that causes the feeling of anxiety in their
oral presentations is due to lack of self-confidence, since it was the code that was repeated the
Participant 2 stated that she does not feel confident about the knowledge she has, which is
Juliet: “Me siento un poco insegura porque creo no saber lo suficiente para responder al
menos con algo aceptable, además de que la misma ansiedad de hablar frente a mis compañeros
Other participants stated the same situation, in which they expressed not to feel confident
Emma: “Me da pánico y con respecto al entorno de clase pues sí, me da pena responder
y que esté mal o suene ridículo, también no me siento como en confianza para hablar”
An additional finding related to the external factors emerged after the participants’
responses on the two semi-structured interviews highlighted a number of fears and worries
related to teachers and peers' attitudes. According to Szyska, M. (2017) language learning
involves reactions from external emotional factors that might often determine positively or very
negatively. Therefore, students react to the performance and attitudes of their teachers and
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 61
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
classmates in various effective ways. Sometimes students get very excited about an English
class, but often they reject the teaching situation and disconnect. This is because teachers, like
students themselves, have personal characteristics and individual differences that influence
performance in the English class and, consequently, this ends up interfering with student results.
Considering the above, the greatest external factors as indicated by the majority of the
participants are relative to perceptions that the teacher could have and which is considered as one
of the main external factors that cause foreign language anxiety, the participants’ statements are
outlined below:
Olivia revealed: “Miedo a no responder bien y que los profesores se enfaden o algunas
In other question Olivia also add that “Existen algunos profesores que se burlan de los
The answers from the two semi-structured interviews succeeded in giving a preliminary
understanding of the Symptoms indicating Foreign Language Anxiety. The findings from the
two semi-structured interviews showed some of the predominant symptoms that indicate high
Results obtained from the participants’ answers concerning this category showed that the
symptoms that predominate in the participants are fear and speaking anxiety since many students
stated that nervousness affects their oral performance since they forget what they wanted to
express. As it can be observed in the answer provided by participant 2 that explains that the
Juliet “Si, siento que he experimentado ansiedad, cuando tengo que presentar un examen
On the other hand, the participant 3 and participant 6 stated that nervousness affects their
pronunciation:
Emma: “Si, muchas veces se me seca la boca y suena raro o a veces de los nervios se me
olvida como se pronuncian algunas palabras, sin embargo, me doy cuenta de que lo hice mal”
Olivia: “Si, algunas veces al empezar a exponer en frente de la clase olvido hacer las
pronunciaciones correctas de algunas palabras, por miedo a olvidar lo que debo exponer”
The answers from the two semi-structured interviews succeeded in giving a preliminary
understanding of the Negative effects of anxiety in oral Communication. The findings from the
two semi-structured interviews showed some of the predominant negative effects that indicate
the consequences of experiencing language anxiety among the sixth semester students.
Results obtained from the participants’ answers concerning this category showed that the
negative effects of foreign language anxiety are the fear of being judge since most of the students
manifested, they think their classmates or their teachers will judge them if they mispronounced a
word or forget what they have to say, as it can be observed in the answer of participant 4 who
affirms that:
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 63
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Oliver: “los estudiantes solemos sentir ansiedad debido a que no tenemos la costumbre
de hablar en público, por otra parte, el miedo a equivocarse y protagonizar el motivo de burla
On the other hand, oral production achievement is the main factor that affects students’
oral productions since to know that they are being qualified quantitatively students became
stressed and worried about their grades, this factor is show on the following answers:
nervios”
Juliet: “Si, siento que la ansiedad me ha afectado cuando tengo mucho que estudiar y
siento que no avanzo, y que no logro retener nada de lo que leo y esto a veces afecta mis notas”
Emma: “Si, pues siempre provoca que mi mente se bloquee (lo cual siempre pasa) afecta
The answers from the two semi-structured interviews succeeded in giving a preliminary
understanding of the strategies to cope with foreign language anxiety. The findings from the
afore-mentioned instruments showed some of the strategies that participants use in order to
Most of the participants suggested a number of activities and strategies to cope with
foreign language anxiety. There was a focus on the participants’ techniques. The interviewees
felt that they can reduce levels of anxiety through (a) classroom activities (b) breath (c) use of
Participant 2 stated that one of the strategies that help reduce language anxiety is through
Juliet: “Mi profesor de inglés maneja diferentes actividades muy dinámicas que hace que
nosotros como estudiantes nos relajemos más. Además de eso, tiene en cuenta las falencias de
Participant 1 also indicated that doing breathing exercises, maintaining serenity and not
paying attention to the people around, is a good strategy that helps provide security to what is
going to be said.
mantener la serenidad al máximo para que no se vean reflejados los nervios y que estos nervios
Participant 5 indicated that another strategy to reduce the level of anxiety is through the
Taking into above, the results it was found anxiety as a negative emotion which highly
Ganschow (1995), Argaman and Abu-Rabia (2002) and it was found a significant relationship
The quantitative analysis is organized in three tables where the categories used to adapt
the questionnaire are grouped with their respective questions, these questions and the six
anxiety factor presented in the majority of the participants which affects the communicative
In relation to the first question, the graphic shows that of the 100% of the participants
three of them answered do not agree this represents 50% of the students which means that most
of them feel insecurity when presenting oral productions, on the other hand, two participants
stated that they neither agree nor disagree being equivalent to 33.3% finally one participant say
agreed with the question representing the 16.7%. These results show Communication
apprehension is manifested in half of the participants because they feel insecurity when facing an
three of them (50%) totally agree with feeling nervousness when speaking in English without
any preparation, two participants agree (33.3%) and one participant neither agree nor disagree,
considering these results it is concluded that Communication apprehension is manifested all the
participants because they feel nervousness when presenting an oral production without previous
preparation, this means that they prefer to have some time to prepare before participating in any
The analysis of results corresponding to this category show that test anxiety is also a
main factor of anxiety experimented by English learners, because they worried about their
performance and achievement during the exams this is evidenced in the following questions:
them answered agree this represents 83.3% of the students which means that most of them feel
worried about losing an English exam, on the other hand, one participant stated that he totally
agrees, this is equivalent to 16.7%. These results show that test anxiety is highly manifested in
In relation to question seven, the graphic shows that of the 100% of the participants three
of them answered agree this represents 50% of the students which means that most of them feel
nervousness about forgetting what they have to answer during an English exam, on the other
hand, two participants stated that they totally agree, this is equivalent to 33.3%, finally one of
them disagree representing 16.7% of the participants. These results show that test anxiety is
manifested in the majority of the participants due to the fear of forgetting what they have to
answer in an English exam, this may be because of the pressure which makes that anxiety
cause of anxiety because participants are worried about the opinion that other people have about
their oral performance. As shown in the statement: “I feel that my peers will judge me if I make
mistakes when speaking English.” where the graphic shows the results of the 100% of the
participants distributed as follows: two participants representing the 33.3% expressed they totally
agree, also two participants (33.3%) neither agree nor disagree and one participant (16.7%)
agree, and the last participant disagrees representing the 16.7%. These results show that fear of
negative evaluation can be experimented because students think they would be judged by their
Also Results in question twelve show that of the 100% of the participants three of them
answered they disagree about do not being worried about making mistakes during the oral
productions in English (50%), two of the participants (33.3%) neither agree nor disagree, and
one participant (16.7%) agrees with the questions. These results show fear of negative evaluation
is manifested in almost all the participants because they are worried about making mistakes
To conclude, these results show what was established by Horwitz and Cope (2010) (as
cited in Tran, 2012 p.72) who stated that FLA is related to communication apprehension, fear of
negative evaluation, and test anxiety rather than being composed of them because as observed in
these results the main causes are associated to factors derived from these categories, as
evidenced in most of the participants' answers where the levels of FLA differs among individuals
depending on the context and the perceptions they have in relation with their abilities because it
is shown that many of them feel influenced by others opinions, due to their lack of self-
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 69
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
confidence, which causes a high level of communication apprehension even if they know the
contents or the topic of the class they feel they can make mistakes when speaking in a foreign
language which clearly affects the oral performance since these negative thoughts provoke
physical reactions such as voice trembling and pronunciation mistakes. Thus, in relation to these
findings, the main sources of FLA are related to physical factors such as the environment of the
classroom and other individuals, because the attitudes of people around them influence the
quality of the performance, as many participants stated, the strategies that teachers implement
help to increase or decrease the feelings of anxiety. On the other hand, psychological and
cognitive factors such as fear, nervousness, and insecurity due to the fear of being evaluated or
being judged, because as it was evidenced, for the participants the academic achievement is
important which can be seen as a sign of knowledge since for many of them having a bad grade
means a failure in the learning process and it is linked with the fear of being judged because
many of them seek to be approved and not being judged by other people.
CONCLUSIONS
Using qualitative data alongside the quantitative data from FLCAS enabled a deeper and
more nuanced understanding of foreign language anxiety from the perspective of the sixth
semester students in their oral productions. After the analysis, it is possible to reach the
following conclusions:
In spite of the fact that students have been studying English for at least three years, they
still experience feelings of anxiety in the English classroom; especially, in aspects regarding
grades and speaking without previous preparation (spontaneously done). As a way of coping
with this emotion, they implement some strategies to ignore or control the anxiety when
presenting an oral production; however, these techniques are not efficient because they do not
On the other hand, FLA causes many negative effects that delay the communicative
process these effects can be physiological problems as heavy breathing, and choked voice,
derived from psychological factors given that students develop subjective feelings that do not let
them express naturally, such as negative thoughts related with their abilities or the self-criticism
about their pronunciation, a problem also associated with the lack of self-confidence that
provokes the symptoms of nervousness, which increases the possibility to make a mistake at the
moment of speaking and make any contributions. In addition, the fear of failing is a cause of
where they stated that exams are a high cause of anxiety due to the fear of forgetting what they
Furthermore, it is important to highlight that the environment of the class also influences
students’ performances since classmates and principally teachers are a main cause of anxiety as
reported in Sadeghi et al. (2013) who stated that “instructor’s behavior like being bad-tempered
or short-tempered or too serious placed a great deal of stress on their students”, thus, teachers’
influence make students feel intimidated during their classes. The results of this study showed
that the majority of the students interviewed felt their teacher was kind and made them feel
comfortable to participate in class thanks to the activities he implemented which decreased their
For students experimenting FLA it is mostly associated with negative factors with
negative consequences over their academic performance, it was found that the main factors that
cause FLA during oral productions are associated with affective factors in concordance to
Hanifa, (2018) who associated it to learners’ feelings and attitudes toward the topic and/or the
interlocutors, since most of the participants manifested they feel intimidated by the opinion of
their partners and teachers, so it is suggested that teachers should learn to understand the
students' emotions in order to create spaces where they feel comfortable to participate.
Taking into above, the main factors that cause foreign language anxiety in sixth semester
students’ oral productions have a correlation with the three main components established by
Horwitz and Cope (1986) in their study. First, communication apprehension is related with
students’ fear to communicate in front of other people especially their teachers because they feel
they do not have enough preparation or feel nervous causing the second component: fear of
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 72
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
negative evaluation, that is derived from self-perceptions which increase linguistic problems
affecting the academic performance, for that reason students feel their pairs will judge them
since mistakes are seen as a sign of failure and lack of knowledge. Finally, these components are
linked with a third component: test anxiety defined by Horwitz et al. (1986) as “a type of
performance anxiety stemming from a fear of failure” the questionnaire showed this component
was the one in which students showed highest levels of anxiety, in view of the fact that most of
them manifested they felt worried when presenting an exam, due to all the factors mentioned
before.
anxiety: The case of students of Japanese, Modern Language Journal 78(2): 155-67
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02026.x
Alrabai, F. (2014, august). A Model of Foreign Language Anxiety in the Saudi EFL
Context.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261873060_A_Model_of_Foreign_Language_Anxiety
_in_the_Saudi_EFL_Context
Serdang, Malaysia.
https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/as/libraryservices/library/asc/documents/public/Short-Guide-
Reflective-Writing.pdf
https://octovany.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/ok-teaching-by-principles-h-douglas-brown.pdf
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 74
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
Chen, Y. (2015). ESL Students' Language Anxiety in In-Class Oral Presentations,
Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 962. Huntington, Virginia Occidenta, United States.
https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/962/
https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
Dell Hymes (1974) Enseñar Lenguaje para Aprender a comunicar (se): La educación
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3998947.pdf
JSTOR.org: https://www.jstor.org/stable/327317?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319593326
Hanifa, R. (2018, September). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking
https://www.academia.edu/13432485/Language_Anxiety_Among_University_Students_Causal_
Factors_and_Coping_Strategies
Karaman, A. Ü. (2010). Foreign Language Learning Anxiety Factor and Its Effects on
https://www.academia.edu/20484976/Foreign_Language_Learning_Anxiety_Factor_and_Its_Eff
ects_on_Students_Oral_Production
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285657789_A_Study_on_English_Language_Anxiety_
among_Adult_Learners_in_Universiti_Teknologi_Malaysia_UTM
Oda, A. H., & Ali, H. (2013, Mars). Investigating the Factors that Cause Language
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282652064_Investigating_the_Factors_that_Cause_La
nguage_Anxiety_in_Iraqi_EFL_Learners
http://www.columbia.edu/~mvp19/RMC/M5/QualEthics.pdf
Oxford, R. (1990), Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know.
https://escholarship.org/content/qt1446j36q/qt1446j36q.pdf
Petrova, Z. K.“Formando
(2017,líderes
June).
para laCauses
construcciónand
de unconsequences
nuevo país en paz” of foreign language anxiety.
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 76
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
http://xlinguae.eu/files/XLinguae3_2017_9.pdf
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/zona/article/view/1708
uso de la web 2.0 para estudiantes de Licenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras, Pamplona, Colombia.
Spetz, H. (2018) L’anxiété langagière et la production orale une étude sur les étudiants suédois
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1222877/FULLTEXT01.pdf
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319506418
Tanveer, M. (August de 2007). Investigation of the factors that cause language anxiety
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293263722_Investigation_of_the_factors_that_cause_l
anguage_anxiety_for_ESLEFL_learners_in_learning_speaking_skills_and_the_influence_it_cast
s_on_communication_in_the_target_language
_EN_PRODUCTION_ORALE_JEUX_DE_ROLES_EN_FLE
Tóth, Z. ( 2010 ). Foreign Language Anxiety and the Advanced Language Learner.
http://langped.elte.hu/WoPaLParticles/W5Toth.pdf
https://www.uv.mx/psicologia/files/2015/07/Tobon-S.-Formacion-basada-en-competencias.pdf
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/41232/1/gupea_2077_41232_1.pdf
https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-018-0045-3
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229736112_An_Investigation_of_Students'_Perspectiv
e_on_Anxiety_and_Spea
will be observed without any manipulation and the researchers are limited to observe and take
notes of what is observed in a specific setting (the classroom). During the observation of the
classes, it will be implemented as an instrument created by the researchers with the purpose of
having a guide to take field notes of the most important aspects of the session.
In order to collect data, it was considered to carry out a semi-structured interview that
will provide us a complete source of data to have a better understanding of the issue that is being
studied which is “Identifying factors that cause foreign language anxiety in students' oral
productions”. That is why the main objective of this questionnaire is to know the perceptions
that foreign language learners have towards oral productions. By the same token, the general
objective to be achieved in this research is to provide answers to the research questions related to
the foreign language anxiety in sixth semester students when speaking English inside the
classroom. In this way it is important to emphasize that the provided information is for academic
purposes only, and the anonymity and confidentiality of the participants will be respected
We thank you in advance for accepting the invitation to join us as a participant in our
research project.
Nombre: ______________________________________
alcancen los niveles de competencia lingüística (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2), según lo establecido
en el Marco Común Europeo de Referencia para las Lenguas (CERF), como requisito para
“Formando líderes para la construcción de un nuevo país en paz”
Universidad de Pamplona
Pamplona - Norte de Santander - Colombia 81
Tels: (7) 5685303 - 5685304 - 5685305 - Fax: 5682750
SC-CER96940 www.unipamplona.edu.co
obtener la licenciatura. ¿Considera usted que tiene un buen nivel de inglés acorde a su ubicación
semestral?
2. Al momento de hablar, los estudiantes tienen que enfrentar muchas situaciones que
pueden afectar su desempeño, estas pueden estar asociadas con causas internas y externas como
las creencias del aprendiz, y la autopercepción como causas internas y también factores externos
que hacen referencia a las creencias de los instructores sobre el aprendizaje y enseñanza, e
interacciones instructor-alumno. (Szyszka, 2017). De acuerdo con esto, ¿cuál crees que es el
factor más desafiante a la hora de hablar un idioma extranjero en clase? ¿Por qué?
3. Szyszka, (2017) afirmó que al presentar una producción oral los estudiantes pueden
experimentar muchas emociones que pueden afectar su desempeño oral ya que los músculos se
tensan "limitando el potencial articulatorio del hablante que puede percibir su pronunciación
como peor de lo esperado". Teniendo esto en cuenta ¿Alguna vez ha sentido que su
4. Szyszka, (2017) afirmó que la forma en que los alumnos ven a los maestros, sus
comportamientos en el aula, sus estilos de enseñanza, los procedimientos del aula y las pruebas
5. ¿Cómo se siente cuando tiene que responder preguntas de forma espontánea o sin tener
una preparación previa sobre el tema? ¿Cree que el entorno de la clase influye en su desempeño
Dear students, it is a pleasure the fact that you have accepted the invitations to join us as
participants in our research project entitled “Identifying the factors that cause foreign language
In this semi-structured interview, you will respond to five questions related with foreign
language anxiety, that is why the main objective of the questionnaire is to discover which are the
main causes of foreign language anxiety. By the same token, the general objective to be achieved
in this research is to provide answers to the research questions related to the foreign language
anxiety in sixth semester students when speaking English inside the classroom. In this way it is
important to emphasize that the provided information is for academic purposes only, and the
anonymity and confidentiality of the participants will be respected regarding the ethical
considerations.
Nombre: ________________________________
1. El aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera implica una serie de factores o desafíos que
pueden afectar el desempeño de los estudiantes. Uno de estos desafíos es la ansiedad que hace
parte de los factores afectivos; Spielberger (1983) definió la ansiedad como " sentimientos
Teniendo en cuenta este concepto, ¿alguna vez ha sentido ansiedad al hablar? ¿De qué
manera?
puedan mostrar lo aprendido. Estas actividades son variadas e implican un tipo diferente de
preparación. Algunos ejercicios que proponen los profesores pueden ser: debates, exposiciones o
juegos de roles. Considerado lo anterior, ¿qué actividades orales son las más difíciles para usted?
3. Sabiendo que la ansiedad es una emoción que puede afectar nuestro rendimiento
With the purpose of collecting data it was considered to carry out a test based on the
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) by Horwitz et al. (1986) , in order to have
a complete source of data and have a better understanding of the issue that is being studied which
is “Identifying factors that cause foreign language anxiety in students oral productions”. That is
why the main objective of this survey is to measure the anxiety levels experimented by the EFL
learners. By the same token, the general objective to be achieved in this research is to provide
answers to the research questions related to the foreign language anxiety in sixth semester
The answers that participants have to provide are based on what is established in the
Likert’s Scale which According to Hernández Sampieri (1997), consists of a set of items
presented in the form of statements or judgments before which the reaction of the subjects to
In this way it is important to emphasize that the provided information is for academic
purposes only, and the anonymity and confidentiality of the participants will be respected
We thank you in advance for accepting the invitation to join us as a participant in our
research project.
7. I am usually nervous about forgetting the things I need to answer during an exam.
9. I feel my heart racing when I know I will be called to speak in my English class.
10. I don't feel pressured when I have to prepare an oral production in English.
12. I don't worry about making mistakes during my oral productions in English.
16. I think my peers will judge me if I make mistakes when I speak English.