Compendium of Analytical Laboratory Methods For Food and Feed Safety: Chemical Analytical Manual (CAM)
Compendium of Analytical Laboratory Methods For Food and Feed Safety: Chemical Analytical Manual (CAM)
METHOD SUMMARY/SCOPE:
Identification and quantitative determination of pentobarbital in tallow and other
grease products of animal origin using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
(LC-MS/MS), using the negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. Pentobarbital is extracted
from a homogenous portion of tallow, wet dog food, dry dog food, or horsemeat using
acetonitrile. After centrifugation, the supernatant is diluted 1:1 with water and analyzed via
LC-MS/MS using a solvent standard curve. Deuterated pentobarbital (pentobarbital-D5) is used
as an internal standard (I.S.) to correct for sample matrix suppression and/or loss of analyte.
Identification of pentobarbital in a sample is based on both correlation of pentobarbital
chromatographic retention time (RT) with that of a standard and ion ratio match.
Analytes(s): Pentobarbitol
Matrices: Tallow and other grease products of animal origin, horsemeat, wet (canned) dog
food, and dry dog food, wet (canned) and dry cat food, meat/bone meal, and meats including
horse, beef, lamb, pork, goat, venison, bison, elk, rabbit, liver, and kidney.
REVISION HISTORY: Revised 7/18/2019. Revision expanded the scope of method from
tallow and grease products to include horsemeat, wet (canned) dog food, and dry dog food.
Revised 2/1/2020: Scope was expanded to include wet (canned) and dry cat food; meat/bone
meal, and meats including horse, beef, lamb, pork, goat, venison, bison, elk, rabbit, liver, and
kidney.
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Document Number:
Revision #: 04
OFFICE OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS WI-000140
Revised: Nov. 2019
Denver Laboratory Compendium method C-005.xx
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 1 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
1. Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 2
2. Scope .................................................................................................................................... 2
3. References ............................................................................................................................ 2
4. Procedure .............................................................................................................................. 3
4.1. Summary of Method .................................................................................................... 3
4.2. Preparation of Samples ............................................................................................... 4
4.3. Preparation of Standards............................................................................................. 5
4.4. Reagents ..................................................................................................................... 8
4.5. Equipment (equivalent equipment may be substituted)................................................ 8
4.6. Instrumentation (equivalent instrumentation may be substituted) ................................ 9
Analyte ......................................................................................................................................... 9
4.7. Extraction .................................................................................................................. 11
4.8. Data Analysis and Quality Acceptance ...................................................................... 12
5. Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 16
6. Records ............................................................................................................................... 16
7. Document History ................................................................................................................ 17
8. Change History .................................................................................................................... 17
9. Attachments......................................................................................................................... 17
Attachment A - Representative chromatograms ................................................................... 18
The chromatograms are graphical images are generated in the SCIEX MultiQuant software summary
report. There is a chromatogram for each of the pentobarbital transitions. The first column is
the pentobarbital quantitation ion transition (most abundant ion) chromatogram (m/z 225→182),
identified as Pentobarbital 1. The second column is the chromatogram for the second most
abundant ion transition (m/z 225→85), identified as Pentobarbital 2 and is used as a qualifier ion
transition. The third column is the least abundant ion (m/z 225→ 138), identified as
Pentobarbital 3 and is used as a qualifier transition. For the bone meal chromatograms (Figures
A10 and A11, a fourth transition is included. It is directly below the Pentobarbital 1 figure. It is
identified as Pentobarbital 4 and is the chromatogram for the transition m/z 225→ 42. It is more
abundant than the pentobarbital quant transition and can be used as an alternative qualifier ion
in cases of matrix interference peaks.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 2 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
1. Purpose
This work instruction describes the application of LIB 4648 for the
determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
2. Scope
For routine analysis of regulatory samples of numerous matrices of animal
origin including: tallow (animal fat/grease), wet (canned) dog and cat food, dry
dog and cat food, meat/bone meal, and meats including horse, beef, lamb,
pork, goat, venison, bison, elk, rabbit, liver, and kidney using LC-MS/MS.
Complete method performance details and validation data is summarized in
the FDA QMiS Denver Lab (DENL) validation summary reports (RPRT- 00055,
RPRT- 000060, RPRT- 00089, RPRT-000125, RPRT-000126).
3. References
Determination of Pentobarbital in Pet Food Using Liquid Chromatography
Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Tuner, James A., Mohrhaus, Angie S., FCC
SOP T064 Version 1, 3/1/2018.
A. LC-HRMS Screen CALIFORNIA ANIMAL HEALTH &FOOD SAFETY
LABORATORY, DTOX-02-877 Rev. 6. November 3, 2017.
B. Pentobarbital in Beef Tallow March 2018, Personnel Correspondence
with UC Davis, “Pentobarbital in Beef Tallow March 2018 (004) UC
Davis extraction March 2018” l
C. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Foods, Guidelines for the
Validation of Chemical Methods for the FDA Foods Program, 2nd Edition
2015.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/scienceresearch/fieldscience/ucm27341
8.pdf
D. ORA Laboratory Manual, Volume II-Methods, Method Verification and
Validation ORA-LAB.5.4.5
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/FieldScience/Laborat
oryManual/UCM092147.pdf
E. DENL QMS # 18-3 and QMiS RPRT-000060 (Determination of
pentobarbital in Tallow, wet pet food, and dry pet food using liquid
chromatography tandem mass spectrometry).
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 3 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 4 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 5 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Pent-D5 Spiking
1,000 0.025 10.0 2,500
(ISTD)
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 6 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 7 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
40 μL 2500 ng = 50.0 ng
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 8 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
4.4. Reagents
4.4.1. Water, Fisher, LC-MS grade
4.4.2. Acetonitrile, Fisher, LC-MS Grade
4.4.3. Pentobarbital, Cerilliant, 1.000 ± 0.005 mg/mL in methanol, 1 mL ampoule,
part # P-010
4.4.4. Pentobarbital-D5, Cerilliant, 1.000 ± 0.005 mg/mL in methanol, 1 mL
ampoule, part #: P-013
4.4.5. Diluent for standards, 50/50 water/acetonitrile (v/v), 500 mL. Combine 250
mL water + 250 mL acetonitrile in a 500 mL graduated cylinder. Cap and
invert to mix.
4.5. Equipment (equivalent equipment may be substituted)
4.5.1. Vortexer/ Mixer, Troemner, (500-2500 rpm)
4.5.2. SPEX Geno/Grinder 2000 (500 rpm)
4.5.3. Sonicator (Branson 2510 or 8510)
4.5.4. Appropriate mixers, blenders, food processors, etc. used to homogenize
sample matrix if necessary
4.5.5. Centrifuge capable of 6000 rpm with refrigeration (4 °C) for 50 mL tubes
4.5.6. Plastic centrifuge tubes with caps, 15 mL and 50 mL
4.5.7. Microcentrifuge tubes, at least 1 mL capacity
4.5.8. Nylon syringe filters, PALL Life Science Acrodisc 13 mm Syringe Filters 0.2
µm
4.5.9. Luer slip 1 mL syringes
4.5.10. 2 mL glass amber autosampler vials and pre-slit snap caps (#66030-608)
4.5.11. Calibrated pipettes and volumetric glassware
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 9 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Typical Average
RT Transition DP CE CXP ion ratio,
qual/quant
(min) (m/z) ISTD (V) (V) (V) %
Analyte
182 -19 -13 100
85 -100 -18 -9 15
pentobarbital 4.20 225 → Pent-D5
138 -21 -10 7
*additional transition of 225→42 was added as additional/alternative confirmation criteria due to matrix
interference peak for 225→85 transition in some bone meal sources at <10 ppb level. The 225→42 transition is
more abundant than the 225→82 transition, giving the ion ratio of >100%.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 10 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
LC note: It has been observed that any mobile phase modifiers (formic acid,
ammonium formate, etc) have a significant negative effect on pentobarbital
response. Ensure LC lines have been thoroughly cleaned and purged with
water and acetonitrile before analysis.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 11 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
4.7. Extraction
A. Weigh 2.00± 0.05 g of each homogenized sample into a 50 mL centrifuge
tube. For each unknown sample, weigh out two portions.
B. For each batch, include an empty tube to serve as Reagent Blank (RB).
C. Weigh out three portions of negative control material to serve as negative
control (NC), matrix spike (SPK), and matrix spike duplicate (DUP).
D. For all samples in the batch, including RB, NC, SPK, and DUP, add 40 µL
of 2500 ng/mL pentobarbital-D5, resulting in a 50 ng/g d5-pentobarbital
concentration.
E. Fortify spike (SPK) and duplicate (DUP) portions with 40 µL of 2500 ng/mL
pentobarbital spiking standard, resulting in a 50 ng/g pentobarbital
concentration in sample. (Fortification level may be adjusted as necessary,
as long as the concentration falls within the calibration curve).
F. If a sample appears to be significantly different than an available control
matrix, an additional portion of sample should be spiked to assess
extraction efficiency and matrix effects compared to the most similar control
matrix.
G. Add 10 mL of acetonitrile to each sample tube.
H. Cap tubes tightly and shake @ 500 rpm for 5 minutes on the geno grinder.
I. Sonicate sample tubes for 30 minutes.
J. Vortex sample tubes for 30 seconds.
K. Centrifuge sample tubes at 6000 x g and 4°C for 10 minutes.
L. Combine 500µL of sample supernatant with 500µL of water in a
microcentrifuge tube; vortex to mix, then filter using a 0.2 µm Nylon syringe
filter into a 2 mL amber LC vial and cap.
M. Analyze via LC-MS/MS.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 12 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 13 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Rendering Streams
Tallow 3.6 11.6 0.9991
Meat Products
Beef 1.6 5.2 0.9997
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 14 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
4.8.5. The tallow MDL and LOQ data in LIB 4648 were originally calculated from
12.5 ng/g spikes (n=9), resulting in calculated MDL of 2.4 ng/g and LOQ of
8.2 ng/g). Additional tallow spikes (n=7) were analyzed at 5 ng/g and 10
ng/g – and the MDL and LOQ were re-calculated using that data, which is
in Table 4.8.4 above.
4.8.6. All calibration curves were generated with the AB SCIEX MultiQuant
software. Depending on the range of the calibration curve, a linear fit with
no weighting or with 1/x weighting (not forced through zero) can be used for
all recovery calculations. If a smaller dynamic range is used, a linear curve
with no weighting should be used. All calibration curves should have r2
≥0.995.
4.8.7. Precision and accuracy general guidance (performance may vary with
sample matrix, especially for different tallow/animal fat matrices):
A. The FDA OFVM specifies that analyte recovery should be within the
range 60%-115% corresponding to concentration from 10-100 mg/kg
(ppb), with RSDr ≤ 22%. Recoveries for elk (123%) and beef liver
(121%) were >115% at the 10 ng/g spiking level. Higher recoveries
at the low spiking level may be due to the use of a linear curve
without weighting.
B. The aforementioned ranges are for guidance on data acceptability.
Ranges for precision and accuracy should be determined in house
after a sufficient number of data points are obtained.
C. Reagent blank (RB) and negative control (NC) should have
responses below the lowest calibration standard.
D. Validation data demonstrated satisfactory quantitative analysis for
pentobarbital determined in all matrices at spiking levels 10, 50, and
250 ng/g, with method accuracy generally ranging from 85-123%,
with RSDr ≤ 16%.
E. Any QC failures must be investigated prior to reporting results.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 15 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 16 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
5. Glossary
A. RB: Reagent Blank. Used to verify reagents are uncontaminated by
interfering components, the reagent blank is an extract that contains no
sample matrix. Carried thorough the extraction as if it were a sample,
one must be extracted with each batch and display no interference
peaks at the reference times of interest at or above lowest calibration.
H. NC: Negative Control. Used to verify the lack of matrix effects, the
control is an aliquot of matrix material known to contain no analytes of
interest. One must be extracted with each batch for each matrix type,
and must display no interference peaks at reference times of interest at
or above lowest calibration.
I. SPK/DUP: Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate. Used to demonstrate
effective and reproducible extraction, the matrix spike and duplicate are
two aliquots of negative control matrix material, each fortified at a level
near the midpoint of the curve. A pair of matrix spikes must be extracted
and analyzed with each batch for each matrix type.
J. ICV: Independent Calibration Verification. Used to assure the accuracy
of the calibration curve, the ICV is a solvent standard prepared from a
secondary standard source.
K. CCV: Continuing Calibration Verification. Used to check the calibration
during a run, the CCV is a re-injection of a midpoint solvent standard
curve. A CCV is injected after every ten sample extracts and at the end
of the analytical sequence.
L. MDL = Method Detection Limit = 𝜎𝜎(𝑡𝑡(𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑=𝑁𝑁−1,1−∝ =0.99,𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)
M. Where: σ = standard deviation (of 5 ng/g spikes, N=7)
N. t = Student’s T value for df = N-1 at the 99% confidence level, one
sided
O. LOQ = Limit of Quantitation = 𝜎𝜎(10)
P. Where: σ = standard deviation (of 10 ng/g spikes, N=7)
Q. LLOQ = Lower Limit of Quantitation, lowest standard in calibration
curve. For this analysis, the LLOQ should be equal to 10 ng/g in
sample (or lower).
6. Records
A. Analyst Worksheets
B. Batch Records
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 17 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
C. Equipment FVPMS
7. Document History
Revision Status* Approving Official Name
Date Author Name and Title
# (D, I, R) and Title
00 I 11/30/2018 Tara Nickel, Chemist R. Stadtmuller, Quality System
Christine Casey, Chemist Manager
01 R 12/4/18 Tara Nickel, Chemist R. Stadtmuller, Quality System
Manager
02 R 03/06/19 Tara Nickel, Chemist R. Stadtmuller, Quality System
Manager
03 R 5/1/2019 Tara Nickel, Chemist R. Stadtmuller, Quality System
Manager
04 R 11/13/2019 T. Nickel, Chemist R. Stadtmuller, Quality System
Manager
* - D: Draft, I: Initial, R: Revision
8. Change History
Revision
Change
#
00 Original
01 Change 10 uL to 20 uL on 2.7.2. Add reporting statement on 2.8.9.3 for
amounts below 10ng/g and >MDL.
02 Minor corrections for spelling, grammar, and formatting
03 Add dry dog food, wet dog food, horsemeat information throughout document
04 Add information for additional matrices throughout document. Copy to ORS
template.
9. Attachments
Attachment A - Representative chromatograms................................................... 18-29
Attachment B – Instrument Acquisition method.................................................... 30-34
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 18 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
The result summary table states the analyte peak precursor name, observed analyte retention
time (RT), expected analyte retention time (RT) time, calculated concentration (ng/g), analyte
response (peak area), calculated Ion Ratio (ration of qualifier ion peak area to quantifier ion
peak area), and Ratio Confirmation (a checkmark indicates the ratio matches the comparison
standards ±20%).
The chromatograms are graphical images are generated in the SCIEX MultiQuant software
summary report. There is a chromatogram for each of the pentobarbital transitions. The
first column is the pentobarbital quantitation ion transition (most abundant ion)
chromatogram (m/z 225→182), identified as Pentobarbital 1. The second column is the
chromatogram for the second most abundant ion transition (m/z 225→85), identified as
Pentobarbital 2 and is used as a qualifier ion transition. The third column is the least
abundant ion (m/z 225→ 138), identified as Pentobarbital 3 and is used as a qualifier
transition. For the bone meal chromatograms (Figures A10 and A11, a fourth transition is
included. It is directly below the Pentobarbital 1 figure. It is identified as Pentobarbital 4 and
is the chromatogram for the transition m/z 225→ 42. It is more abundant than the
pentobarbital quant transition and can be used as an alternative qualifier ion in cases of
matrix interference peaks.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 19 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 20 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 21 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ion Ratio Ratio
Analyte Peak Name
RT RT Response (Expected Confirms
(ng/g) Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 22 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure A4: Result Summary for Wet Dog Food Negative Control, Source W2
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ion Ratio Ratio
Analyte Peak Name
RT RT Response (Expected Confirms
(ng/g) Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 23 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure A5: Result Summary for Wet Dog Food Fortified at 50 ng/g, Source W2
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ion Ratio Ratio
Analyte Peak Name
RT RT Response (Expected Confirms
(ng/g) Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 24 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure A6: Result Summary for Dry Dog Food Negative Control, Source D3
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ion Ratio Ratio
Analyte Peak Name
RT RT Response (Expected Confirms
(ng/g) Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 25 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure A7: Result Summary for Dry Dog Food Fortified at 50 ng/g, Source D3
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ion Ratio Ratio
Analyte Peak Name
RT RT Response (Expected Confirms
(ng/g) Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 26 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 27 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Calculated Calculated
Analyte Expected Concentration Analyte Ratio
Analyte Peak Name RT Ion Ratio
RT Response Confirms
(ng/g) (Expected Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 28 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure A10: Result Summary for Bone Meal Negative Control (source 2)
Calc Calculated
Analyte Expecte Conc. Analyte Ratio
Analyte Peak Name Ion Ratio
RT d RT Response Confirms
(ng/g) (Expected Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Pentobarbital 4
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 29 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Calc Calculated
Analyte Expecte Conc. Analyte Ratio
Analyte Peak Name Ion Ratio
RT d RT Response Confirms
(ng/g) (Expected Value)
Chromatograms – Bars on peaks are expected ion ratio ± 20% of comparison standards
Pentobarbital 4
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 30 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
HPLC column – Agilent Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18, 2.1 x 50 mm, 1.8 micron size column
MS Method Properties:
Period 1:
--------------
Scans in Period: 1854
Relative Start Time: 1000.00 msec
Experiments in Period: 1
Period 1 Experiment 1:
----------------------------
Scan Type: MRM (MRM)
Scheduled MRM: No
Polarity: Negative
Scan Mode: N/A
Ion Source: Turbo Spray
Resolution Q1: Unit
Resolution Q3: Unit
Intensity Thres.: 0.00 cps
Settling Time: 0.0000 msec
MR Pause: 5.0070 msec
MCA: No
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 31 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 32 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Step Table:
@Step Total Time(min) Flow Rate(µl/min) A (%) B (%)
0 0.00 350 95.0 5.0
1 3.50 350 5.0 95.0
2 4.50 350 95.0 5.0
3 8.50 350 95.0 5.0
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 33 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Step Table:
@Step Total Time(min) Flow Rate(µl/min) A (%) B (%)
0 0.00 0 50.0 50.0
1 8.50 0 50.0 50.0
Method Description:
Syringe: 100ulDLW
Title:
Determination of pentobarbital in ingredients of animal origin and in finished pet Page 34 of 34
foods using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.