Scribd
Upload
324 views

College of St. John - Roxas: Content Validity Form

This document contains a content validity form for assessing the relevance of statements to measured objectives using a 4-point scale. It provides guidelines for the minimum number of experts and acceptable content validity index values based on different numbers of experts. The researchers or statistician will use this form to calculate a content validity index for determining whether the survey questionnaire is valid before proceeding to reliability testing.

Uploaded by

Miles Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
324 views

College of St. John - Roxas: Content Validity Form

This document contains a content validity form for assessing the relevance of statements to measured objectives using a 4-point scale. It provides guidelines for the minimum number of experts and acceptable content validity index values based on different numbers of experts. The researchers or statistician will use this form to calculate a content validity index for determining whether the survey questionnaire is valid before proceeding to reliability testing.

Uploaded by

Miles Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

COLLEGE OF ST.

JOHN – ROXAS
Member: Association of LASSSAI- Accredited Superschools (ALAS)

CONTENT VALIDITY FORM

Legend:

1 – The item is not relevant to the objectives that will be measured.


2 - The item is somewhat relevant to the objectives that will be measured.
3 - The item is relevant to the objectives that will be measured.
4 - The item is higly relevant to the objectives that will be measured.

Directions: Please check the box that corresponds to your answer.

Statement/s 1 2 3 4 SCORE Comments/Suggestions

Add rows if necessary…

Note:
Number of Experts Acceptable Content Validity Index Source of recommendation
Two experts At least 0.80 Davis (1992)
Three to five experts Should be 1 Polit & Beck (2006), Polit
et.all., (2007)
At least six experts At least 0.83 Polit & Beck (2006), Polit
et.all., (2007)
Six to eight experts At least 0.83 Lynn (1986)
At least nine experts At least 0.78 Lynn (1986)

Note: To be solved by the researchers or Statistician to check the Content Validity Index (CVI).

Formula:
CVI = n/N

Where in:

n = Numbers of evaluator agreed


N = Sum of Evaluator

Statements n N CVI Remarks


(Accepted / Not
Accepted)

Note: If the survey questionnaire is valid, proceed to reliability test.

You might also like