Etabs Report Sample
Etabs Report Sample
DESIGN REPORT
FOR
Residential Building of
MR.. CHOLESHWOR SHARMA KHANAL
Kartik, 2077
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 3
3. LOADING ............................................................................................................................................ 6
9. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................. 42
1. INTRODUCTION
The principal aim of the structural design is to prepare necessary construction detail of structural system so as to
possess adequate strength, stiffness and stability during the action of all possible loads in its life span. Accordingly,
the structural design data are presented in the report.
3
2. DETAILED PARAMETERS OF THE BUILDING
Plot no : 650
No of Storey :3
Wall thickness (brick) : 230mm for outer Walls, 115mm for partition
Total Ht : 8.61 m
4
Bearing Capacity : 150 KN/m2 at foundation level
Concrete Grade : M20 for all beams, columns, slab and staircase…
i. IS456:2000 [Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete] for Design of Concrete
Structures.
ii. IS1893:2002 [Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure] for Earthquake load
calculation.
iii. IS875:1987 [Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and
structures] for Other Load calculation.
iv. SP16:1980 [Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS456:1978] for design of the structural
members.
v. IS13920:1993 [Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces] for
Ductile Detailing of the structural members.
5
3. LOADING
All loadings are derived bases on different parts of IS875. Earthquake load is calculated based on IS1893:2000.
c. Finishing on floors
i. Floors: 1 KN/m2
ii. Staircase: 1.0KN/m2
where:
DL = Dead Loads
LL = Live Loads
EL = Earthquake load
7
4. DESIGN CRITERIA
The concrete structures are designed using Limit State Method which is incorporated in IS456:2000.
The limit state method of design covers different criteria for design. The two major criteria are
The limit state of collapse of the structure or part of the structure could be assessed from rupture of one or
more critical sections and from buckling due to elastic or plastic instability (including effects of sway where
appropriate) or overturning. The resistance to bending, shear, torsion and axial loads at every section shall
not be less than the appropriate value at that section produced by the probable most unfavourable
combination of loads on the structure using the appropriate partial safety factors.
8
5. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE
Wall load
Live load
6. ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE
Column:
View 1
View 2
View 3
View 4
Beam:
Base
At FF lvl
At SF lvl
At TF lvl
Summary Report
Model File: PALPA, Revision 0
10/29/2020
2.3 Modal Results
28
8. DESIGN SUMMARY
The summary of the design with full detail of reinforcement schedule are presented
presented in the following section.
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8 304.8 60 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Notes:
30
8.2 Beam Design
Two different beam sections used in the building are tabulated below. The reinforcement shall be as specified in the
drawings.
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 33 33
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Sn Designation Size
1 BEAM-PRIMARY (BP) 9”X114”(including slab)
2 TIE BEAM 9”x12”
3.3 50 N/mm
Length of short span, Lx = m fy = 2
5 0
4.4
Length of long span, Ly = m
1
Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 15 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm
Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 127 mm ; Effective depth, d = 108 mm
l
Effective span, = 3.35 m (or) 3.228 m whichever is less; d = 3.228 m
x
l
= 4.41 m (or) 4.288 m whichever is less; d = 4.288 m
y
1.3 2
(ly / lx) = < Here, (ly / lx) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
3 ;
Load Calculations
0.127 x 3.1 KN/m
Dead Load of slab = = KN/m2 Dust Load on slab = 0 2
25 8
1.0 KN/m
Finishes load on slab = KN/m2 Other load on slab = 0 2
0
Live Load on slab = 3.0 KN/m2
Total Dead load acting on the 4.1
= KN/m2
Structure 8
Total live load acting on the Structure = 3.0 KN/m2
Factored Design Load w = 10.77 KN/m2
Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)
Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous For this support condition,
1.3 Long span
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx) =
3, coefficient,
a a
For negative moment, = 0.0668 For negative moment, = 0.047
x y
a a
For positive moment, = 0.0502 For positive moment, = 0.035
x y
Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w lx2 & My = ay w lx2
A
st
Mu / (0.12/100) m
Mu pt , Ast , min = = 152
bd2 bD m2
re
q
N/mm
KNm 2 % mm2
For Short
Reinforcement
Span,
details
At mid span, 5.63 0.48 0.1369 148
Provi
At supports, 7.50 0.64 0.1844 199 Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
de
(Ast pro. 33 mm2
For Long span, supports for short span
= 5 )
Provi
At mid span, 3.93 0.39 0.1106 119 Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
de
supports for long (Ast pro. 33 mm2
At supports, 5.27 0.53 0.1516 164
span = 5 )
Design
d = 129 mm Required
D = 150 mm
d = 129 mm
Loads
DL of waist slab = 3.75 kN/m2
DL on horizontal area = 4.58 kN/m2
DL of steps = 2.225 kN/m2
LL = 3 kN/m2
FF = 1.5 kN/m2
Total load = 11.30 kN/m2
(of one
Factored load = 17.0 flight)
BM and SF
Mu = 35 kN-m
Vu = 35 kN
k = 2.131
pt = 0.572 %
Ast = 738 mm2
34
Main Reinforcement
Dia = 12 mm
Spacing = 153 mm
Distribution Steel
Ast = 155 mm2
Dia of bar = 8 mm
Spacing = 320 mm
Development Length
Ld = Ld = (Ø x σs) / (4 x Tbd)
Therefore, Ld = 760 mm
Provide, Ld = 800 mm
Isolated Footing F1
Load Pu 710 KN
Design Load P 521 KN
35
L 2.00 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 2.00 meters
Area Provided A prvd 4.00 meters
Zx 1.33
Zx 1.33
Footing Size OK
2 Slab Design
lx 0.848
ly 0.848
Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
533 sqmm 212 c/c 377 c/c 590 c/c
533 sqmm 212 c/c 377 c/c 590 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion
Vu1 158 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 231 KN
36
One Way Shear Check OK
Vu1 158 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 231 KN
Isolated Footing F2
Load Pu 580 KN
Design Load P 425 KN
L 1.80 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.80 meters
Area Provided A prvd 3.24 meters
Zx 0.97
Zx 0.97
Footing Size OK
37
2 Slab Design
lx 0.748
ly 0.748
Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
473 sqmm 239 c/c 425 c/c 664 c/c
473 sqmm 239 c/c 425 c/c 664 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion
Vu1 125 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 185 KN
Vu1 125 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 185 KN
38
One Way Shear Check OK
Isolated Footing F3
Load Pu 390 KN
Design Load P 286 KN
L 1.50 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.50 meters
Area Provided A prvd 2.25 meters
Zx 0.56
Zx 0.56
Footing Size OK
2 Slab Design
lx 0.598
ly 0.598
Bending Moment in x
dir Mx 34 KN-m
Bending Moment in y My 34 KN-m
39
dir
Minimum Depth
Required dmin 113
Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
353 sqmm 321 c/c 570 c/c 890 c/c
353 sqmm 321 c/c 570 c/c 890 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x
direcion
Minimum Ast required across y
direcion
@ 150 mm
Ast across x direction 12 mm dia 754 sqmm
c/c
@ 150 mm
Ast across y direction 12 mm dia 754 sqmm
c/c
Vu1 87 KN
ζv 0.197 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 115 KN
Vu1 87 KN
ζv 0.197 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 115 KN
41
9. CONCLUSIONS
A Residential building has been fully designed using a computer program, ETABS non linear version 16.2.1. All the
required design details has been calculated and presented.
Best-approach has been adopted for most-economical design, yet fulfilling all the requirements for important
building. Due considerations has been given to all room requirements and probable increase in load.
Reinforcements are quite satisfactory and they are so balanced for easier material handling and concreting. Due
attention has been made in reinforcement congestion and size and number of bars are balanced for easiest and
safest construction. In some places, more than required reinforcement is provided for feasibility during construction.
During construction, it is mandatory to follow IS13920, regarding provision of stirrups and ties, development lengths,
splices and other detailing.
42
43