MDOT Shop Drawing Review Process 718756 7
MDOT Shop Drawing Review Process 718756 7
Subsection 104.02 of the MDOT SSC discusses general requirements of contract plans and working drawings
for MDOT projects. The Department’s review and approval of shop drawings does not relieve the
Contractor of full responsibility for all negligence in the construction of the project resulting from the shop
drawings and it is not a warranty of the adequacy and correctness of the drawings. However, the
Contractor and Department should approach the submittal, review, approval, and distribution process as
a team effort to ensure accurate and timely construction of the structure. Subsection 104.02 of the MDOT
SSC states, “The Department will require a reasonable amount of time for review and approval”, but some
non-standard pay items have language in the special provision that requires each shop drawing review
cycle (from receiving the submittal to providing a response) to be completed within a specified number of
days.
2. Submittal Requirements
The Contractor must submit for review all shop drawings and calculations (design and load rating, when
applicable) not furnished by MDOT for all parts of the work as required by the contract in Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) into ProjectWise as discussed in Sections 5 and 6 of this document. The
Contractor is responsible for the correctness of the shop drawings and calculations (when applicable),
and ensuring their design (when applicable) complies with any permit requirements. It is the Contractor’s
responsibility that all items are fabricated to the correct dimensions. MDOT’s approval of the shop
drawings is a verification that the drawings appear to be consistent with the contract documents.
Approval does not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility for the accuracy of dimensions on shop
drawings or for complete submittals satisfying applicable contract requirements, nor does it permit
deviations from the contract without MDOT’s documented consent. Subsection 104.03 of the MDOT SSC
discusses deviations from the plans. The Contractor is required to submit a Request for Information (RFI)
seeking approval from the MDOT Construction Engineer (Engineer) to deviate from the contract plans.
The Engineer must provide the RFI to the MDOT Design Project Manager (Design PM) for their disposition
on the proposal. For more information on RFI’s see MDOT’s Structural Fabrication Request for Information
Process
If revisions are necessary after the shop drawing set is approved, the Contractor is required to submit a
complete shop drawing set (proposed new sheets, revised sheets, and remaining sheets that are already
stamped approved) for review to ensure each submittal is a standalone set. Previously approved shop
drawing sets can be moved to the “Rejected” folder located in ProjectWise so they are kept for historical
purposes. Incomplete shop drawing submittals must be rejected back to the Contractor; however, large
projects may consist of several smaller shop drawing sets, known as a series (100, 200, 300, etc.), to
facilitate production provided each series is complete and contains all general notes required for that
series to standalone and be individually approved. Subsequent series submitted for review and approval
must either reference the general notes located on an earlier approved series or the series must contain
all relevant general notes to standalone and be individually approved.
3. Coordinator Responsibilities
The MDOT Bridge Design PM (or their delegate) is responsible for coordinating the shop drawing review
process for all shop drawings required for pay items on bridge plan sheets, whereas the Engineer (or their
delegate) is responsible for coordinating the shop drawing review process for all shop drawings required
for pay items on road plan sheets. The Coordinator (Bridge Design PM or Engineer) must distribute the
shop drawings to the MDOT technical review areas shown in this document. MDOT shop drawing review
checklists can be found in Chapter 10 of the MDOT BDM for common structural elements. These checklists
are used by the MDOT technical review areas to ensure consistent, accurate, and efficient shop drawing
reviews.
In general, shop drawings do not require a Contractor’s Professional Engineer’s (PE) seal; however, there
are some circumstances where a PE seal is warranted. Below are a few instances where the Contractor
may be required to provide shop drawings with a PE seal:
• Contract specifications, although extremely rare, may mandate a PE seal as evidence of a PE’s
review.
• Shop detail drawings may be required to have a PE’s seal if the Contractor has proposed
significant changes to the design of the structure. For example, if the Contractor submits a
Structural Fabrication Request for Information (RFI) proposing to fabricate something different
(e.g. smaller weld size) than specified in the contract documents then they may be required by
MDOT to have a PE seal the shop drawings to show compliance with their new design.
• Value-engineering change proposals (VECP) require a PE’s seal and a formal submittal from the
Contractor to MDOT with all calculations and justifications for the change. Requiring the PE to seal
the shop drawings may be required to ensure the drawings comply with the VECP.
Shop drawing review comments (both external comments for the Contractor’s action and internal
comments for the Coordinator’s information) must be placed in the Adobe PDF file located in ProjectWise
(see Section 6 of this document for more information) using Adobe commenting tools. The Coordinator is
responsible for ensuring that all comments have been addressed by either reviewing the revised shop
drawings or sending the revised submittal back to the applicable MDOT technical review area for them
to confirm. After the Coordinator is satisfied with the shop drawings, they electronically stamp them
approved. Contact MDOT’s Structural Fabrication Unit at [email protected] to
obtain MDOT’s shop drawing stamps and instructions for installing them.
MDOT does not have specific qualification requirements for the Coordinator; however, shop drawing
reviewers typically hold the same certification as the work they are reviewing (e.g. the reviewer should
have a PE license if they are reviewing structural calculations performed by a PE) and are qualified to
perform the review.
The following three stamp designations (see Figures 1 and 2) will be used by the Coordinator (or their
delegate) when stamping shop drawings:
• Approved – this stamp is used when the shop drawings appear to be in general conformance
with the contract plans. All sheets are required to be stamped “Approved”.
• Approved Subject to Correction – this stamp is used when the shop drawings appear to be in
general conformance with the contract plans, but there are very minor corrections needed for
historical records that will not affect fabrication of the elements. Only the first sheet is stamped
“Approved Subject to Correction” and the drawings must be resubmitted for review and
approval.
• Revise and Resubmit – this stamp is used when the shop drawings are not in general conformance
with the contract plans and approval could result in elements being incorrectly fabricated. Only
STRUCTURAL FABRICATION UNIT MDOT SHOP DRAWING REVIEW PROCESS
V101217 PAGE 3 of 9
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
the first sheet is stamped “Revise and Resubmit”. The Contractor would be working at their own
risk if they began fabricating and the Structural Fabrication Unit would notify the Engineer
immediately and recommend fabrication wait until after drawings are stamped approved.
Figure 1. Depiction of MDOT’s shop drawing stamps. The Coordinator’s work area (e.g. Bridge Design,
Xxxx Region, or Xxxxx TSG) is shown on the bottom of the stamp.
Filcek & Associates, Inc. Filcek & Associates, Inc. Filcek & Associates, Inc.
Figure 2. Depiction of MDOT’s consultant shop drawing stamps when shop drawing coordination is
delegated to them by MDOT’s Bridge Design PM. The consultant’s company name is shown on the
bottom of the stamp.
Changes to the approved shop drawings during the fabrication process by the Contractor and omissions
or errors discovered during fabrication require resubmittal of the shop drawings for MDOT’s review and
approval immediately if the changes will affect how the element is fabricated, whereas minor changes
must be reviewed and approved prior to shipping. Shop drawings must be revised and submitted for
MDOT’s review and approval if an approved RFI is incorporated into the project. Approved
nonconformance reports (NCR) are used by MDOT’s quality assurance inspector (QAI) in conjunction with
the approved shop drawings for inspection and acceptance. Approved NCRs are not required to be
incorporated into the shop drawings since they will become part of the fabrication inspection records
along with the approved shop drawings. For more information on NCRs see MDOT’s Structural Fabrication
Nonconformance Process.
4. Innovative Contracting
The shop drawing review process in this document applies to Design-Bid-Build projects, but this section will
discuss subtle changes required to successfully review shop drawings for innovative contracting such as
Design-Build projects. Design-Build is an innovative construction method that pairs the EOR with the
Contractor. The Design-Build contract documents contain the shop drawing requirements, but the main
difference between a Design-Build and a Design-Bid-Build project is that the EOR on the Design-Build
team is required to completely review and approve the shop drawing submittal prior to MDOT’s review.
Once the Design-Build team is satisfied with the submittal and has stamped each sheet “Approved”, the
MDOT Design-Build Project Manager (Design Build PM) acts as the shop drawing coordinator and
distributes the submittal to all applicable MDOT technical review areas. The Design Build PM collects
comments from all MDOT technical review areas and returns them to the Contractor for their response.
Once satisfied, the Design Build PM places a “Released for Construction” stamp on each shop drawing
sheet. It is important to note that the EORs (contractor’s design firm) shop drawing stamp does not state
“For MDOT” since they are working for the Contractor; however, the stamp must contain the following
information:
5. High-Level Flowchart
Yes
6. ProjectWise Workflow
It is the Design PM’s responsibility to ensure the ProjectWise workflow is setup for their project before
project turn in. Contact [email protected] for assistance with the following steps:
1. Contractor receives shop drawing distribution email list for Project Office, Coordinator, and other
contacts at pre-construction meeting.
2. Contractor names shop drawing file per MDOT’s file naming convention document.
4. Contractor changes state from “Pending” to “Submitted” generating emails to Project Office,
Coordinator and other contacts defined in Step 1 with a ProjectWise path for the shop drawing.
6. Project Office changes the state from “Pending” to “Ready for Review” generating an email that
notifies the Coordinator that the file is available for review.
7. Coordinator changes the state to “Review in Process” generating an email that notifies the MDOT
technical review areas that the file is available for review.
8. Technical review area add comments to the file in the “Review in Process” folder. Each area must
add all of their comments, even if they duplicate comments from other areas. Technical review
area then emails Coordinator notifying them that their review is complete.
9. Once all comments have been received, Coordinator copies and pastes file into "Original
Comments" folder to be kept as project record.
10. Coordinator then consolidates comments on the file in the “Review in Process” folder for
Contractor use. Coordinator stamps sheets appropriately and cuts and pastes file into either
“Approved” or “Rejected” folder.
• Approved shop drawings must have “Approved” stamped on every sheet and are placed
in the “Approved” folder.
• Rejected shop drawings must have “Revise and Resubmit” on the first sheet only and are
placed in the “Rejected” folder.
11. Coordinator changes state from “Pending” to “Notified” generating an email that notifies the
Project Office.
12. Project Office notifies the Contractor that file is available for them.
13. If corrections are necessary, the process repeats from Step 2 until shop drawing is approved.
Table 1. Common list of shop drawings required to be reviewed and approved by MDOT. See next page
for more information on superscripts next to shop drawing name.
Bridge Sign Connections 1,9(note a) Precast Bridge Element Systems (PBES) 1,8,9 (note b)
DMS Support Structure 1,6, (note a) Steel Sheet Piling, Temp 1,4
EPS Lightweight Fill 1,4 Steel Sheet Piling, Temp, LIP 1,4
MSE Wall 1,4,8,9 Traffic Signal Mast Arm and Pole 1,9,10, (note a)
Municipal Utility1,2,8
(Table 1 continued)
The alphabetical superscripts next to the shop drawing name above correspond to the special notes
below:
a) Bridge railing, bridge sign connections, cantilever sign structure, DMS support structure, traffic
signal mast arm pole and mast arm, strain pole, and truss sign structure plan sheets are standard
plans or special details that have been designed by MDOT. Since these engineering drawings are
designed for repetitive use, shop drawings do not need to be reviewed and approved on a
project by project basis. Each fabricator is required to submit one set of shop drawings for each
standard plan (e.g. SIGN-370-A) or special detail (e.g. SIG-153-A) for MDOT review and approval.
Subsequent shop drawing submittals are only required if the standard plan or special detail is
revised (e.g. SIG-153-A to SIG-153-B) or if the Contractor changes the shop drawings.
b) Load Rating Unit must be notified of any changes that affect the structural capacity of the
elements shown in the contract documents.
c) Three-sided, arch, box arch, or box culvert shop drawings with 10 feet and greater span lengths
(measured along roadway centerline) must include separate design and load rating calculation
files with load rating specified in the name of the load rating files. Calculations are subject to
approval of Coordinator and Load Rating Unit in accordance with subsection 406.03 of the MDOT
SSC.
* Coordinator should provide the Engineer of Record (EOR) the opportunity to review shop drawings.
V030917 PAGE 1 of 1
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
V030917 PAGE 1 of 2
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
e) An erection diagram or plan view is included that shows the general layout of the concrete
elements. Details include a system for marking all elements to ensure proper orientation and
location of field placement;
f) Prestressing strands:
i) The number and location of strands for each beam;
ii) The location and length of prestressing strand debonding and/or draping; and
iii) The pretensioning force on the strands.
g) Size, location and type of the inserts (i.e., for end or intermediate diaphragms);
h) Proper clearances between dissimilar metals or proper insulation is provided (contact the
Experimental Studies Unit in Bridge Field Services for additional information);
i) Dimension of end blocks (if used);
j) Location of hold-down devices for draped strands;
k) Lifting devices and dunnage:
i) Location of lifting devices along the beam is acceptable based on beam stability analysis;
ii) Size and quantity of strands used for the lifting devices; and
iii) Location of dunnage along the beam is acceptable based on beam stability analysis.
l) The method(s) of joining adjacent elements is detailed.
V030917 PAGE 2 of 2
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
V030917 PAGE 1 of 3
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
h) Camber dimensions;
i) Blocking and lifting diagrams are included;
j) Coating system:
i) Appropriate notes about faying surfaces are included;
ii) Correct Federal color number is specified; and
iii) The appropriate limits for each Federal color number are indicated.
k) Workmanship:
i) Re-entrant corners match the design (1” minimum radius or as checked for fatigue);
ii) Joint sealant is indicated for all un-welded joints; and
iii) All stiffener welds stop ¼”short of inside cope clips and wrap around outside edge of stiffener.
V030917 PAGE 2 of 3
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
V030917 PAGE 3 of 3