ID Test Building_ID Publication

Wu. Z. 2019. FieldYear Countrycomfort

study on thermal Region Cooling_Strat
and energy Database
saving potential in 11 split
1 b air-conditioned office2019buildingsChina
in Changsha,Asian
China AC CARD
2 e Zaki.
Luo. M.S. 2017 2017 thermal
2015. Evaluating Malaysia
comfort inAsian AC
mixed-mode buildings: A CARD
field study in
3 f aDamiati.
subtropical 2015
climate China Asian AC CARD
S. 2016. Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Ind
4 g Singapore,
Damiati. S. and
2016. 2016
Japan study Malaysia
Fieldduring hot and humid
on adaptive Asian
season
thermal comfort AC CARD in Malaysia, Ind
in office buildings
5 h Singapore,
Damiati. S. and
2016. 2016
Japan studyIndonesia
Fieldduring hot and humid
on adaptive Asian
season
thermal comfort AC CARD in Malaysia, Ind
in office buildings
6 i Singapore,
Damiati. S. and
2016. 2016
Japan studySingapore
Fieldduring hot and humid
on adaptive Asian
season
thermal comfort AC CARD in Malaysia, Ind
in office buildings
7 j Singapore, 2016during hot
and Japan
Khalid. W. 2019. Investigation Japan
of and humid
comfort Asian
season
temperature andAC CARD for
thermal adaptation
8 k patients 2019
and visitors
Jiao. Y. 2020. Adaptive Malaysia
in thermal
Malaysian hospitals
comfort Asian AC
models for homes for older people CARDin
9 p Shanghai, China
Cho. H. 2018. 2020 of thermal
Evaluation China comfortAsian AC
in an office building servedCARD
by a liquid
10 q desiccant-assisted 2018
evaporative Korea
cooling Asian
air-conditioning AC
system
Zhang. S. 2017. Optimization of Room Air Temperature in Stratum-ventilated CARD
11 t Rooms
Takasu.forM.Both 2017
2017.Thermal
Study on China
Comfort
adaptiveand Energy
thermal Asian AC
Saving in Japanese
comfort CARD
offices under various
12 u operation
Zhang. modes
Y. 2013. Thermal comfort in buildings with split air-conditionersCARD
2017 Japan Asian AC in hot-humid area
13 y of China
Norhidayah. 2013Indoor Air
A. 2013. China
Quality andAsian AC
Sick Building Syndrome inCARD
Three Selected
14 z Buildings 2013 Malaysia Asian AC CARD
15 3 Indraganti, M 2012 India Asian AC 2
16 5 Indraganti, M 2012 India Asian AC 2
17 8* Indraganti, M 2012 India Asian AC 2
18 11* Indraganti, M 2012 India Asian AC 2
19 19 Cao, Bin, et 2003 China Asian AC 2
20 20 Cao, Bin, et 2003 China Asian AC 2
21 21 Andamon, Mary 2003 Philippines Asian AC 2
22 24 Honnekeri, A. 2011 India Asian AC 2
23 66 Manu, S., Shu 2012 India Asian AC 2
24 68 Manu, S., Shu 2013 India Asian AC 2
25 70 Manu, S., Shu 2012 India Asian AC 2
26 72* Manu, S., Shu 2013 India Asian AC 2
27 74 Manu, S., Shu 2012 India Asian AC 2
28 76 Manu, S., Shu 2012 India Asian AC 2
29 88* Sekhar, S. C., 1996 Singapore Asian AC 2
30 89 Busch J. F. ( 1988 Thailand Asian AC 1
31 90 Busch J. F. ( 1988 Thailand Asian AC 1
32 128 de Dear, R. J. 1986 Singapore Asian AC 1

0.450

0.400

0.350

0.300

0.250
asian
0.200 wester

0.150

0.100

0.050

0.000
0.200 wester

0.150

0.100

0.050

0.000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
 Climate RH_mean Vel_mean Ta_mean int ID Test Building_ID
hot humid 57.00 0.170 1 c
hot humid 49.50 0.130 24.20 2 a'
humid subtropical 68.70 0.120 26.10 3 1
hot humid 58.20 0.230 24.00 4 47
hot humid 47.30 0.130 25.50 5 52
hot humid 64.90 0.060 23.10 6 93*
hot humid 56.70 0.150 26.10 7 97
hot humid 60.50 0.080 23.50 8 98*
hot humid 57.70 0.020 20.20 9 99
humid subtropical 55.00 0.190 24.00 10 101
hot humid 52.50 0.190 25.97 11 102
hot humid 51.00 0.300 27.90 12 109
hot humid 66.00 0.410 29.60 13 110
hot humid 61.50 0.150 25.20 14 111
58.95 0.180 29.35 15 112*
54.83 0.190 29.49 16 113
48.57 0.030 25.78 17 116
54.00 0.040 25.11 18 117
40.39 0.310 26.18 19 118
49.52 0.270 26.50 20 119
47.37 0.140 23.76 21 121
32.65 0.120 27.07 22 122
59.48 0.150 24.80 23 130*
50.03 0.170 26.12 24 131*
67.29 0.220 25.64 25 132
65.44 0.240 26.11 26 133
52.16 0.070 23.89 27 134
43.67 0.070 24.30 28 135
58.21 0.180 23.27
58.58 0.130 23.54
59.88 0.120 23.66
55.52 0.110 22.87
n 32 32 31
X 55.0950 0.1584 25.2519 Prueba F - Fisher
S 7.9570788 0.0860274 2.0662082 RH_mean Vel_mean
S2 63.3151032 0.0074007 4.2692161 F calc 2.1085 4.4461
Ses 0.99463485154 0.0107534193 0.2624086977633 95% 7%
F crit (RH)
Max 68.7000 0.4100 29.6000 Err:509 2.41
Min 32.6500 0.0200 20.2000 F crit (Vel) 1.85 2.41
P-value 0.448942 0.18148 0.152137 F crit (Temp) 1.90 2.50
Normal si si si
Xn-X 13.6050 0.2516 4.3481
X-Xl 22.4450 0.1384 5.0519
TN1 calc 2.924
HO: las muestras analizadas d
α 95% 99% 99.90% significativamente igual tanto en Asia
asumir un solo
TN1 crit 2.773 3.135 3.546
si no no
HI: las muestras analizadas de
Outlier significativamenteigual tanto en Asian
0.4100
asumir un solo
 Publication Year Country Region Cooling_Strat Database Climate
López. L. 2019. Adaptive thermal comfort model for educational buildings in a hot-humid
2019 Mexico Western A/C CARD hot humid
climate
Conceição. E. 2011. Evaluation of thermal comfort conditions in a classroom equipped with
2011 Portugal Western Mediterrane
radiant cooling systems and subjected to uniform convectiveA/C
environment CARD
Kim, H. 2012. M 2011 USA Western A/C 2
Stoops, J. L."T 1998 Sweden Western A/C 2
Stoops, J. L."T 1999 Sweden Western A/C 2
Brager, G et al 1995 USA Western A/C 1
Donnini, G. et 1994 Canada Western A/C 1
Donnini, G. et 1995 Canada Western A/C 1
de Dear, R. J. 1983 Australia Western A/C 1
de Dear, R. J. 1982 Australia Western A/C 1
de Dear, R. J. 1982 Australia Western A/C 1
1996 Australia Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
Schiller, G. E. 1987 USA Western A/C 1
de Dear, R.J. a 1992 Australia Western A/C 1
de Dear, R.J. a 1993 Australia Western A/C 1
1992 USA Western A/C 1
Benton, C. C. a 1993 USA Western A/C 1
Benton, C. C. a 1991 USA Western A/C 1
Benton, C. C. a 1993 USA Western A/C 1
Cena, K. and de 1997 Australia Western A/C 1
Cena, K. and de 1997 Australia Western A/C 1
n
X
S
S2
Ses
ueba F - Fisher Max
Ta_mean int Min
2.9507 P-value
7% Normal
2.41 Xn-X
2.41 SI hay difenciencias significativas en las varianzas de X-Xl
2.50 las velocidades de aire analizadas TN1 calc
α
TN1 crit
Outlier
as muestras analizadas de velocidad de aire se comportan
ente igual tanto en Asian como en Wester, por lo tanto se puede
asumir un solo valor de la variable
muestras analizadas de velocidad de aire no se comportan
nteigual tanto en Asian como en Wester, por lo tanto no se puede
asumir un solo valor dela variable
 RH_mean Vel_mean Ta_mean int
53.00 0.14
50.00 0.20 0.450
28.00
38.91 0.160 24.29 0.400
44.89 0.030 23.41
0.350
25.03 0.050 23.26
44.89 0.070 23.09 0.300 f(x) = 0
R² = 0.9
39.89 0.100 23.31

Air Speed (m/s)

0.250
16.82 0.110 22.82
53.22 0.150 23.76 0.200
52.37 0.110 23.50 f(x) = 0
0.150 R² = 0.9
43.92 0.110 23.43
38.83 0.170 22.03 0.100
58.32 0.070 22.60
0.050
63.61 0.090 23.00
61.24 0.090 23.44 0.000
0 5
62.76 0.090 22.72
30.26 0.060 23.10
32.56 0.070 21.34
40.14 0.070 22.70
34.02 0.070 22.80
50.83 0.120 23.31
56.31 0.130 23.59
37.30 0.080 23.15
50.15 0.080 22.71
29.97 0.080 22.01
48.17 0.070 22.06
43.92 0.170 22.94
43.40 0.100 21.23
28 28 27
44.4546 0.1014 23.0963
11.5541163 0.0407989 1.2028497
133.4976036 0.0016646 1.4468473
1.5439837 0.0054520 0.1636871
63.6100 0.2000 28.0000
16.8200 0.0300 21.2300
0.830394 0.116862 0.000023710
si si no
19.1554 0.0986
27.6346 0.0714
2.416
95% 99%
2.714 3.068
si no
 Asian Western
0.020 0.030
0.450 0.030 0.050
0.400 0.040 0.060
0.060 0.070
0.350
0.070 0.070
0.300 0.070
f(x) = 0.000167597464206 x² + 0.070
0.003147802742798 x + 0.046582661290322
R² = 0.918284465878173
0.080 0.070
Air Speed (m/s)

0.250
0.110 0.070
asian
0.200 0.120 0.070 Polynomial (asian)
0.120
f(x) = 0.000150309460654 x² + 0.080 wester
0.000381036587933 x + 0.054493284493285
0.150 R² = 0.96110742939776 Polynomial (wester)
0.120 0.080
0.100 0.130 0.080
0.130 0.090
0.050
0.130 0.090
0.000 0.140 0.090
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0.150 0.100
ID TEST 0.100
0.150
0.150 0.110
0.170 0.110
0.170 0.110
0.180 0.120
0.180 0.130
0.190 0.14
0.190 0.150 α 90% 95%
0.190 0.160 n=28 0.2435 0.2912
TN9 Crit
0.220 0.170 n=32 0.2313 0.2773
0.230 0.170 Outlier n=28 NO NO
0.240 0.20 Outlier n=32 SI NO
0.270
0.300
-
0.310
0.410
TN9 calc 0.263 0.2000 Max (Xn)
 98% 99% 99.5%
0.3444 0.3795 0.4107
0.3289 0.3625 0.3929
NO NO NO
NO NO NO
Regresión para la obtención de valores críticos para la distribución F a
95% de confianza.
α 25 27 28 29 30
26 1.94 1.92 1.92 1.91 1.90
30 1.88 1.86 1.86 1.85 1.84
31 1.87 1.85 1.85 1.84 1.83
32 1.86 1.84 1.84 1.83 1.82
35 1.82 1.81 1.80 1.80 1.79

t student
v 95 98 99 99.8 2.06
28 2.048 2.467 2.763 3.408 2.05
29 2.045 2.462 2.756 3.396
30 2.042 2.457 2.750 3.385 2.04 f(x) = − 0.001391
R² = 0.954571045
31 2.042 2.456 2.746 3.3784 2.03
35 2.030 2.438 2.724 3.340
2.02
40 2.021 2.423 2.704 3.307
50 2.009 2.403 2.01
58 1.997 2.396
2
59 1.997 2.394
60 2.000 2.390 1.99
70 1.994 2.381
1.98

1.97
Regresión para la obtención de valores críticos para la distribución F a 1.96
95% de confianza. 25 30 35 40 45
α 15 20 21 25 27
10 2.85 2.77 2.76 2.73
11 2.72 2.65 2.64 2.60
12 2.62 2.54 2.53 2.50
13 2.53 2.46 2.45 2.41
14
 Regresión para la obtención de valores críticos para la distribución F a
99% de confianza.
α 25 27 28 29 30
26 2.57 2.54 2.53 2.51 2.50
30 2.45 2.43 2.41 2.40 2.39
31 2.43 2.41 2.39 2.38 2.37
32 2.41 2.39 2.37 2.36 2.35
35 2.35 2.32 2.31 2.30 2.28

2.06

2.05

2.04 f(x) = − 0.001391282792005 x + 2.0824116880075

R² = 0.954571045266699
2.03

2.02

2.01 Column C
Linear (Column C)
2

1.99

1.98

1.97

1.96
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75