Not The Last Pandemic: Investing Now To Reimagine Public-Health Systems
Not The Last Pandemic: Investing Now To Reimagine Public-Health Systems
by Matt Craven, Adam Sabow, Lieven Van der Veken, and Matt Wilson
© Skaman306/Getty Images
May 2021
This article was originally published in July 2020 Correcting these weaknesses won’t be easy.
to make an economic case for investments in Government leaders remain focused on navigating
infectious-disease surveillance and preparedness. the current crisis, but making smart investments
The overall message remains as clear now as it was now can both enhance the ongoing COVID-19
a year ago: the returns from smart investments in response and strengthen public-health systems
preparedness and response are likely to be large to reduce the chance of future pandemics.
multiples of their costs. We have refined the article Investments in public health and other public goods
with three updates that build on our prior work: are sorely undervalued; investments in preventive
measures, whose success is invisible, even more so.
— We sharpened some cost estimates based Many such investments would have to be made in
on further analysis and new information that countries that cannot afford them.
has become available over the past year.
For example, the importance of genomic Nevertheless, now is the moment to act. The world
sequencing, “ever warm” vaccine manufacturing has seen repeated instances of what former World
capacity, and R&D platforms has been Bank president Jim Kim has called a cycle of “panic,
made ever clearer by the trajectory of the neglect, panic, neglect,” whereby the terror created
COVID-19 pandemic. by a disease outbreak recedes, attention shifts,
and we let our vital outbreak-fighting mechanisms
— We have included more detail on our line-item atrophy.1 The Independent Panel for Pandemic
cost estimates and a deep dive on surveillance Preparedness and Response published its findings
costing (available for download on McKinsey.com). in May 2021, describing the COVID-19 pandemic as
the 21st century’s “Chernobyl moment” and making
— We have included new cost analyses, including clear that if investment doesn’t occur now, “we will
cost per capita and the share of spend at the condemn the world to successive catastrophes.”2
global, regional, and country levels.
While some are calling the COVID-19 crisis a
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed 100-year event, we might come to see the current
overlooked weaknesses in the world’s infectious- pandemic as a test run for a pandemic that arrives
disease-surveillance and -response capabilities— soon, with even more serious consequences.
weaknesses that have persisted in spite of the Imagine a disease that transmits as readily as
obvious harm they caused during prior outbreaks. COVID-19 but kills 25 percent of those infected
Many countries, including some thought to have and disproportionately harms children.
strong response capabilities, failed to detect or
respond decisively to the early signs of SARS-CoV-2 The business case for strengthening the world’s
outbreaks. That meant they started to fight the virus’s pandemic-response capacity at the global, national,
spread after transmission was well established. and local levels is compelling. The economic
Once they did mobilize, some nations struggled to disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could
ramp up public communications, testing, contact cost more than $16 trillion3—many times more than
tracing, critical-care capacity, and other systems the projected cost of preventing future pandemics.
for containing infectious diseases. Ill-defined or We have estimated that spending approximately
overlapping roles at various levels of government $85 billion to $130 billion over the next two years
or between the public and private sectors resulted and approximately $20 billion to $50 billion annually
in further setbacks. And the challenges, including after that could substantially reduce the likelihood
difficulties with vaccine rollouts, lingering vaccine of future pandemics (Exhibit 1). This equates to an
hesitancy, and difficulties in managing second and average of about $5 per person per year for the
third surges, have continued as the pandemic has world’s population. Approximately 30 percent of this
entered its second year. spend would take place at the global and regional
1
Sophie Edwards, “Pandemic response a cycle of ‘panic and neglect,’ says World Bank president,” Devex, April 5, 2017, devex.com.
2
COVID-19: Make it the last pandemic, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, May 2021, theindependentpanel.org.
3
“Crushing coronavirus uncertainty: The big ‘unlock’ for our economies,” May 2020, McKinsey.com.
Assuming
Assuming aa COVID-19-scale
COVID-19-scale epidemic
epidemic isis aa 50-year
50-year event,
event,the
thereturn
returnon
on
preparedness investmentisisclear,
preparedness investment clear,even
evenififititonly
onlypartly
partly mitigates
mitigates the
thedamage.
damage.
~85–130
~20–50
~16,000
levels, and about 70 percent would take place strengthening agenda. Cost estimates will continue
at the country level (8 percent in high-income to evolve as new information emerges. We hope the
countries and 62 percent in middle- and low- overall message is clear: infectious diseases will
income countries). continue to emerge, and a vigorous program
of capacity building will prepare the world to
These are high-level estimates with wide error bars. respond better than we have so far to the
They include pandemic-specific strengthening COVID-19 pandemic.
of health systems but not the full health-system-
Web <2020>
<COVID-LastPandemic>
Exhibit <2 > of <10>
Exhibit 2
Five shifts in healthcare systems can help reduce the chance of future
Five shifts in healthcare systems can help reduce the chance of future pandemics.
pandemics.
From To Rationale
“Break glass in case “Always on” systems and Outbreak response is most effective
of emergency” partnerships that can scale when it uses regularly applied
response systems rapidly during epidemics mechanisms
Scramble for Systems ready to surge while Epidemic management requires ability
healthcare capacity maintaining essential services to divert healthcare capacity quickly
without lessening core services
Five
Five pillars
pillarsof
ofpreparedness
preparedness can be built
built for
for $357 billion, in
$357 billion, inour
ourestimate.
estimate.
A better system might be founded on a principle Both the public and private sectors have played
of active preparedness and constructed out of major roles in the response to the COVID-19 crisis,
mechanisms that can be consistently used and but collaboration has not always been as smooth
fine-tuned so they are ready to go when outbreaks as it might have been if collaboration channels had
start (Exhibit 4). We see several means of instituting been preestablished. There have been notable
such an always-on system. One is to use the exceptions, including collaborations to increase
same mechanisms that we need for fast-moving access to ventilators.4
outbreaks (such as COVID-19) to address slow-
moving outbreaks (such as HIV and tuberculosis) The principle of active preparedness might also
and antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. Case lead governments to strengthen other aspects of
investigation and contact tracing are skills familiar pandemic response. For example, the past year
to specialists who manage HIV and tuberculosis. But has highlighted gaps in the manufacturing and
few areas have deployed their experts effectively in stockpiling of personal protective equipment, the
responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. sharing of information with the public through
4
“Special bulletin: Public-private effort launched to help distribute existing ventilators to high-need areas of the U.S.,” American Hospital
Association, April 14, 2020, aha.org.
● Maintain robust medical-supply stockpiles and emer- — maintaining robust stockpiles of medical
gency supply-chain mechanisms
supplies and emergency supply-chain
● Conduct regular outbreak simulations and cross-sector mechanisms at the subnational, national, or
preparedness activities regional levels (depending on the setting)
● Improve communications and messaging
— conducting regular outbreak simulations and
● Implement effective public-health responses at points other cross-sectoral preparedness activities
of entry
Source: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Georgetown University; Global Virome Project; — strengthening communications and messaging
National Academy of Medicine; Nature; The Lancet; US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention; World Bank; World Health Organization; World through established risk-communication
Organisation for Animal Health
systems, internal and partner communication
and coordination, public communication
and engagement with affected communities,
dynamic listening, and rumor management
● Build and maintain high-quality outbreak-investigation for example, through the proposed new international
capacity pandemic treaty, currently under discussion.5
● Increase IDSR¹-like surveillance of notifiable diseases
Such an agenda might include closing gaps
● Develop strong pathogen surveillance in population-representative foundational
surveillance; strengthening notifiable disease,
● Support serosurveillance
lab-based, and pathogen surveillance; and
● Strengthen data integration and analysis improving data integration and the use of data.
An investment program of $25 billion to $40 billion
¹Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (framework from US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention). for the first two years and $6 billion to $10 billion
Source: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Georgetown University; Global Virome Project;
National Academy of Medicine; Nature; The Lancet; US Centers for Disease per year thereafter (for a ten-year total of $75 billion
Control and Prevention; World Bank; World Health Organization; World
Organisation for Animal Health to $115 billion) would pay for the following:
5
“Global leaders unite in urgent call for international pandemic treaty,” WHO, March 30, 2021, who.int.
Web <2020>
Exhibit 8
<COVID-LastPandemic>
Exhibit <8> of <10>
To mitigate
To mitigate the
the secondary
secondary health
health effects
effectsof
ofpublic-health
public-healthcrises,
crises,health
healthsystems
systems
need to plan for surges and continuation of essential services.
need to plan for surges and continuation of essential services.
Example secondary health effects of health crises
Source: Academic articles; expert/field interviews; ministries of health; news reports; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; World Bank data sets; World
Health Organization
6
“There have been 7m-13m excess deaths worldwide during the pandemic,” Economist, May 15, 2021, economist.com.
7
“Prioritizing diseases for research and development in emergency contexts,” WHO, who.int.
8
Kate Kelland, “Vaccine ‘revolution’ could see shots for next pandemic in 100 days,” Reuters, March 10, 2021, reuters.com.
9
David Richards, “Edward Albee and the road not taken,” New York Times, June 16, 1991, nytimes.com.
Fundingfor
Funding forepidemic
epidemic preparedness
preparedness requires
requires an
an up-front
up-front investment
investment to
toclose
close
current gaps.
Illustrative funding needed to invest in epidemic preparedness, $ billion
1 Aepidemic-preparedness
“ramp up” phase is needed to close
gaps 2 Steady-state preparedness reduces the likelihood
and average severity of future outbreaks
Disease 25–40
surveillance
3–6
6–10
Prevention
14–21 7-11
agenda
2–4
4–6
Research and
development 16–24
Year 1 Year 2
Matt Craven, MD, is a partner in McKinsey’s Silicon Valley office; Adam Sabow is a senior partner in the Chicago office;
Lieven Van der Veken is a senior partner in the Geneva office; and Matt Wilson is a senior partner in the New York office.
The authors wish to thank Gaurav Agrawal, Xavier Azcue, Marie-Renée B-Lajoie, Zoe Fox, Erika LaCasse, and Vignesh Vetrivel
for their contributions to this article.