0% found this document useful (0 votes)
277 views5 pages

Surgery of The Appendix

The document summarizes key aspects of appendicitis including: 1) Acute appendicitis is usually caused by obstruction of the appendix, often by a fecalith, leading to distention, bacterial invasion and eventually perforation if not treated. 2) Clinical manifestations include abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and rebound tenderness at McBurney's point. 3) Alvarado scoring is used to evaluate the likelihood of appendicitis, with a score of 10 indicating a high probability. Immediate appendectomy is the standard treatment if rupture is suspected due to risk of complications.

Uploaded by

Joseph De Joya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
277 views5 pages

Surgery of The Appendix

The document summarizes key aspects of appendicitis including: 1) Acute appendicitis is usually caused by obstruction of the appendix, often by a fecalith, leading to distention, bacterial invasion and eventually perforation if not treated. 2) Clinical manifestations include abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and rebound tenderness at McBurney's point. 3) Alvarado scoring is used to evaluate the likelihood of appendicitis, with a score of 10 indicating a high probability. Immediate appendectomy is the standard treatment if rupture is suspected due to risk of complications.

Uploaded by

Joseph De Joya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Surgery: The Appendix o Usually in one of the infarcted areas of the

antimesenteric border
o Just beyond the obstruction and not at the
References: Baby and Mommy Schwartz, 10th Edition
tip
 Sequence is NOT inevitable –some episodes
Anatomy and Function spontaneously resolves
 Base is attached to the cecum  Causes of obstruction
 Tip may be retrocecal (most common), pelvic, subcecal, o Fecalith or appendicolith (most common)
preileal, or right pericolic in postion o Foreign bodies
 3 taenia coli converge at the junction of cecum and o Intestinal worms
appendix o Trauma
 Length may be <1 cm to >30 cm (6-9 cm most common) o Bezoars
 Lymphoid tissue, secretes IgA (an integral component of
gut-associated lymphoid tissue [GALT]) Bacteriology
o Function is “not essential” –no immune  Principal organisms involved are Escherichia coli (G-,
compromise upon resection facultative, bacilli) and Bacteroides fragilis (G+, anaerobic,
bacilli)
Acute Appendicitis o Both are normal flora of appendix
o Seen in both acute and perforated appendicitis
Historical Background  Up to 14 different organisms were identified
 Charles McBurney – greatest contributor to treatment  Culture – questionable (normal flora predominance)
(1889) o Peritoneal culture reserved for patients who are
o Described McBurney’s point (point of maximum immunosuppressed and PX who develop
tenderness) abscess after treatment
o One-half to two inches inside the right anterior  Broad-spectrum antibiotics indicated
spinous process of the ilium on a line drawn to o Non perforated → 24-48 hour-antibiotics
the umbilicus o Perforated → 7-10 days recommended
 Semm – widely credited to 1st perform a successful o IV antibiotics given when WBC count is normal
laparoscopic appendectomy (1982) and patient afebrile for 24 hours

Incidence Clinical Manifestations


 Lifetime rate: 12%m:25%f – 7% undergoes appendectomy  Symptoms
for acute appendicitis o Abdominal pain – prime symptom in acute onset
 Seen more frequently in 2nd to 4th decades of life (20-40);  Classic presentation: diffusely centered
mean age of 31.3; median age of 22 in lower epigastrium/umbilical area
 Male over female predominance – 1.2-1.3m:1f  Moderately severe, steady, may have
 Rate of misdiagnosis: 15.3% (equivalent to appendiceal superimposed intermittent cramping
rupture)  After varying period of 1-12 hours –
o Higher in women – 22.2%:9.3% localizes to RLQ
 Negative appendectomy rate for women of reproductive  (there are cases where pain starts in
age: 23.2% highest in 40-49 years old RLQ and stays there)
o Highest negative appendectomy rate – women  Location of appendix account for
>80 years old variation of pain locus (in the somatic
 Etiology and pathogenesis (interpret as 1 will cause 2, 2 phase)
will cause 3…) o Anorexia is almost always present
1. Proximal obstruction  Diagnosis is questionable if Px is not
2. Closed loop obstruction (Continuous luminal anorectic
secretion) o Vomiting is present in 75% of cases
3. Distention o Obstipation prior to onset of pain
4. Stimulates visceral afferent stretch fibers o Diarrhea may occur (particularly in children)
5. Pain (vague, dull, and diffuse) in mid/lower o In 95% of cases: Anorexia → abdominal pain →
epigastrium vomiting
6. Cramps (distention aggravates peristaltic waves)  If vomiting comes before pain, think
7. Continued distention + multiplication of resident otherwise
bacteria (may cause nausea and vomiting)  Signs
8. Pressure exceeds venous pressure o Determined principally by anatomic position of
9. Capillary and venous occlusion, arteriolar inflow appendicitis
continues o Vital signs
10. Engorgement + vascular congestion  Temperature elevation rarely exceeds
11. Arteriolar inflow occlusion 1C
12. Involvement of serosa and parietal peritoneum  Pulse rate – N to sl↑
13. Pain shifts to RLQ  Greater changes in VS indicate
 Ultimately, distention + bacterial invasion + vascular complication
compromise + infarction = PERFORATION o General Survey and PE findings
 Prefers to lie supine with thighs drawn Alvarado Scale for Diagnosing Appendicitis
up (motion causes pain) Category Manifestation Value
 Classic RLQ pain if appendix is anterior Symptoms Migration of pain 1
of cecum Anorexia 1
 Tenderness maximal at or near Nausea/Vomiting 1
McBurney’s point Signs RLQ tenderness 2
 Direct rebound tenderness Rebound 1
 Referred/indirect rebound tenderness Elevated temp 1
may also be present (maximal at RLQ) Lab values Leukocytosis 2
 Indicates peritoneal irritation Left shift 1
 Rovsing’s sign (+) Total points 10
 Palpatory pressure in LLQ
produces pain in RLQ Appendiceal Rupture
 Cutaneous hyperesthesia at T10-T12
 Immediate appendectomy – standard treatment of acute
 Abdominal guarding
appendicitis due to risk of rupture
 Psoas sign (+)
 25.8% - overall rate of perforated appendicitis
 Obturator sign (+)
o Most prevalent in children <5 years old, and
 Laboratory Findings
older patients >65 years old
o Mild leukocytosis (10,000-18,000/mm3)
 Nonoperative treatment increases morbidiy and mortality
 Usually present in acute onset,
risk associated with ruptured appendicitis
uncomplicated cases
 Rupture should be suspected in the following
 With PMN predominance
o Fever >39C
 If WBC > than specified, suspect
o WBC >18,000/mm3
perforation
o Localized rebound/referred tenderness
o Urinalysis useful to rule-out UT as infection
o Ill-defined mass on PE
source
 Phlegmon
 Bacteriuria not found in catheterized
 Periappendiceal abscess
urine specimen in acute cases
 Px with mass – longer duration of
symptoms (5-7 days)
Imaging Studies
 Of note
 Plain radiographic films are rarely helpful
o Phlegmons and small abscesses may be treated
o Useful only to rule-out other pathologies
conservatively with antibiotics
o Acute – abnormal bowel gas pattern –
o Well-localized abscesses – percutaneous
nonspecific finding
drainage
o Fecalith is rarely noted – if present, highly
o Complex abscesses – surgical drainage
suggestive of diagnosis
o Interval appendectomy recommended after 6
 Graded compression sonography
weeks following acute event treated
o With maximal compression, appendiceal
nonoperatively or with simple drainage of
diameter is measured in the anteroposterior
abscess
dimension
o Positive – if appendix is noncompressible 6 mm
Differential Diagnosis
or more in anteroposterior direction
 Essentially the diagnosis of “acute abdomen”
o Presence of appendicolith establishes diagnosis
o Clinical manifestations are mostly not specific
o Other highly suggestive findings
and therefore may have identical clinical picture
 Thickening of appendiceal wall
with a wide variety of acute processes in the
 Periappendiceal fluid or mass
abdomen
o When acute appendicitis is excluded, perform
 Preoperative diagnosis accuracy of 85% is acceptable
brief survey of the abdominal cavity
o Less than this may result to unnecessary
 On CT scan
operations
o Inflamed appendix is dilated
o If consistently greater than 90% - would mean
o Wall thickened
you’re “observing” instead of operating
o Evidence of inflammation with “dirty fat”
 Diseases/conditions commonly misdiagnosed as acute
o Thickened mesoappendix
o Obvious phlegmon appendicitis and found to be naught ntraoperatively
(descending order of frequency):
o Fecalith (easily visualized)
o Arrowhead sign (thickening of the cecum, o Acute mesenteric lymphadenitis
o No organic pathologic condition
funnels contrast to the inflamed appendix)
o Acute pelvic inflammatory disease
 Laparoscopy
o Twisted ovarian cyst or ruptured graafian follicle
o Both diagnostic and therapeutic approach
o Acute gastroenteritis
o Most useful for females
 Differentials depend on four major factors:
 Used to differentiate acute
o Anatomic location
appendicitis from acute gynecologic
o Stage of process
pathology
o Px age
o Px sex
Acute Appendicitis in the Young o TB
 Diagnosis is more difficult o Lymphoma
 Higher morbidity rate due to o Other causes of infectious colitis
o ↑ propensity for rupture  Immediate appendectomy is indicated
 Underdeveloped tissues and rapid  In patients with diarrhea as primary symptom,
progression colonoscopy may be warranted
o Underdeveloped greater omentum  Negative appendectomy rate – 5-10%
 Lesser ability to contain a rupture o Up to 25% will have AIDS-related entities in
 <5 vs. 5-12 years of age respectively operative specimen
o Negative appendectomy rate: 25% vs. <10%  CMV
o Appendiceal perforation rate: 45% vs. 20%  Kaposi
 Treatment regimen includes  M. aviumintracellulare
o Perforated – immediate appendectomy and  Postoperative morbidity rate higher in Px with perforation
irrigation of peritoneal cavity  Hospital stay rate is longer
o Antibiotics
 Nonperforated – 24-48 hrs Treatment
 Perforated – 7-10 days  Preoperative preparations
 IV preparations given when Px is o Adequate hydration
afebrile for at least 24 hrs o Electrolyte abnormalities corrected
o Laparoscopic appendectomy – safe and effective o Preexisting conditions should be addressed
 Cardiac
Acute Appendicitis in Older Adults  Pulmonary
 Incidence is lower than young  Renal
 Morbidity and mortality is higher o Preoperative antibiotics may be considered
 High index of suspicion should be observed (lowered infectious complications in trials)
 >80 years of age  Cefoxitin
o Perforation rate – 49%  Cefotetan
o Mortality – 21%  Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid
 More severe infections
Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy  Carbapenems
 Most frequently encountered extrauterine disease  Combination therapy with
requiring surgical treatment in pregnancy o 3rd gen
 Most frequent during 1st and 2nd trimesters cephalosporin
 Diagnosis is inversely related to gestational age o Monobactam
o Due to displacement of appendix latero-  Aminoglycoside plus
superiorly o Clindamycin
 Nausea and vomiting (or new-onset) after 1st trimester o Metronidazole
may be of consideration for diagnosis  Open Appendectomy
 Abdominal pain and tenderness may be present but less o Incision is either McBurney (oblique) or Rocky-
guarding (due to abdominal laxity) Davis (transverse) at the point of maximal
tenderness or palpable mass
 WBC >15.000-20,000 /uL – PMN predominance
 (according to doc Cabredo, Rocky-
 Abdominal ultrasound is beneficial
Davis is more common now-a-days)
 Laparoscopy may be indicated especially in early
o Abscess suspected → lateral incision for
pregnancy
retroperitoneal drainage
 Premature labor risk of 10-15% in appendectomy during
o Diagnosis in doubt → midline incision for better
pregnancy
examination of cavity
 Appendiceal perforation – significant factor in fetal and
 Relevant in older Px where
maternal death
malignancy/diverticulitis is possible
o Fetal mortality – 3-5% in early appendicitis to
o Localization techniques
20% if with perforation
 Follow convergence point of taenia coli
 Sweeping lateral to medial motion
Appendicitis in Patients with AIDS or HIV Infection
 Limited mobilization of cecum
 Presentation of acute appendicitis same as noninfected o Once appendix is identified
persons except for  Divide mesoappendix
o Nonmanifestation of absolute leukocytosis (only  Ligate appendiceal artery
relative leukocytosis) o Appendiceal stump clearly viable with base of
 Increased risk for appendiceal rupture associated to cecum uninvolved in inflammatory process -
o Delay in manifestation managed by:
o Low CD4 count  Simple ligation
 Differential diagnosis should always include opportunistic  Ligation and inversion
infection such as but not limited to
 Purse-string stitch
o CMV
 Z-string stitch
o Kaposi sarcoma
o Mucosa obliterated to avoid mucocele formation
o Peritoneal cavity irrigated o Associated to added expense and longer
o Wound closed in layers hospitalization
o If perforation or gangrene is found in adults o Initial treatment include
Skin and subcutaneous tissue left open to  IV antibiotics
heal by secondary intent (may be closed  Bowel rest
after 4-5 days [delayed primary closure]) o Percutaneous or operative drainage of abscess is
o In children primary wound closure is always not considered failure of conservative therapy
indicated
 Laparoscopy Prognosis
o Performed under general anesthesia  Mortality is steadily decreasing
o Requires 3 ports (or sometimes 4) o Principal factors of mortality include rupture
o Steps before surgical treatment and age of Px
 Surgeon in Px’s left  Complications occur in 3% of Px with nonperforated vs.
 Assitant 1 operates camera 47% in Px with perforations
 One trocar in the umbilicus  Serious early complication is usually septic (abscess and/or
 Another trocar suprapubic wound infection)
 3rd trocar variable (usually in LLQ,  Complete wound dehiscence rarely occurs in McBurney
epigastrium, or RUQ) type of incision
 Abdomen is first thoroughly explored  Predilection sites of abscesses
(rule-out other pathology) o Appendiceal fossa
 Identify appendix o Pouch of Douglas
 Dissection at the base o Subhepatic space
 Division of mesentery from o Between intestinal loops
appendiceal base o Rectally bulging abscess (transrectal drainage)
 If mesoappendix involved,  Fecal fistula may occur as a complication of appendectomy
divide appendix by stapler; o May be due to sloughing of cecal portion inside a
then divide mesoappendix constricting purse-string suture
from appendix o Ligature’s slipping off an appendiceal stump
 Base of appendix is not inverted o Necrosis from abscess encroaching on cecum
 Appendix removed via trocar site or
within retrieval bag Chronic Appendicitis
 Evaluate site for hemostasis  An uncommon disease
 RLQ irrigated  Pain lasts longer but less intense in the same location
 Trocars removed  Characteristic symptoms
o Should be considered only as an option in thin o Vomiting (lower incidence)
males aged 15-45 o Anorexia
o May be beneficial to obese males o Nausea (occasionally)
o Pregnant women withpresumed appendicitis o Pain with motion
may benefit from diagnostic laparoscopy o Malaise
 Leukocyte counts are normal
Laparoscopy vs. Open Appendectomy  CT scans are non-diagnostic
Category Laparoscopy Open  Laparoscopy is effective
Duration and cost ↑ ↓  Appendectomy is curative
Wound infection ↓ ↑  Px whose symptoms are not cured or recur usually have
Intraabdominal Crohn disease as an underlying diagnosis
↑ ↓
abscess
Pain of 1st Appendiceal Parasites
↓ ↑
postoperative day
 Live parasites cause obstruction
Hospital length of
↓ ↑  Ascaris lumbricoides – most common
stay
 Others
Benefit to thin
↓ ↑ o E. vermicularis
males (15-45 yo)
o S. stercoralis
Benefit to obese
↑ ↓ o E. granulosis
males
 Presence of parasites make appendectomy difficult
 Px treated with helminthicide post-operation
 Interval Appendectomy
 Amebiasis can also cause appendicitis
o Performed on Px with palpable or
o Invasion by trophozoites
radiographically documented mass (abscess or
o Component of more generalized intestinal
phlegmon)
amebiasis
 Initial conservative therapy with
o Appendectomy followed by antibiotic therapy
interval appendectomy after 6-10
(metronidazole)
weeks later
o Provides lower morbidity and mortality rates Incidental Appendectomy
than immediate appendectomy
 Both appendicitis and appendicitis with perforation are  Mucocele
more common in men than women o Leads to progressive enlargement due to
 NNT = 36 (36 incidental appendectomies performed to intraluminal accumulation of mucoid substance
prevent the occurrence of 1 appendicitis) o Histologic type dictates course and prognosis of
 Indications for incidental appendectomy disease
o Children about to undergo chemotherapy  Retention cysts
o Disabled who cannot respond normally to  Mucosal hyperplasia
abdominal pain  Cystadenomas
o Crohn disease Px in whom cecum is free of  Cystadenocarcinomas
macroscopic disease o If benign – simple appendectomy
o Individuals about to travel to remote areas o Pseudomyxoma peritonei
without access to medical/surgical care  Rare condition where diffuse
collections of gelatinous fluid are
Tumors associated with mucinous implants on
 Extremely rare peritoneal surfaces and omentum
 2-3x more common in females than
 Incidence of primary appendiceal malignancy is 0.9-1.4%
males
found on appendectomy specimens
 Usually present with
 <50% of cases diagnosed perioperatively
 Abdominal pain
 Epidemiology
 Distention
o Carcinoid (most common in most series studies)
– greater than 50% of cases  Mass
o NCI – SEER reports histologic update  Ureteral obstruction and/or venous
 Mucinous adenocarcinoma as most obstruction may occur
common (37%)  CT scanning is preferred
 Carcinoid as second most common  Perioperative location of mucinous
(33%) ascites and tumor deposits in women
 Carcinoid  Right hemidiaphragm
o Appendix most common site of GI carcinoid  Right retrohepatic space
 Small bowel then rectum  Left paracolic gutter
(respectively)  Ligament of Treitz
o Carcinoid syndrome rarely associated with  Ovaries
appendiceal carcinoid unless metastases are  Surgical debulking is mainstay of
present treatment (all gross disease removed)
o The tumor may/may not obstruct the lumen  Appendectomy routinely performed
(most common site is apex/tip)  Hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo-
o Malignant potential directly proportional to size oophorectomy is performed in women
of tumor  Not of benefit
o <1 cm – 78%  Ultra-radical surgery
o 1-2 cm – 17%  Adjuvant chemo
o >2 cm – 5%  Systemic post-op chemo
o Treatment  Lumph node and distant mets are
 Simple appendectomy most common uncommon
 <1 cm with mesoappendiceal  Recurrences treated by additional
extension and >1.5 cm – right surgery – although associated with
hemicolectomy  Enterotomies, anastomotic
 Adenocarcinoma leaks, fistulas
o Rare neoplasm of appendix  Lymphoma
o Has three subtypes o Uncommon
 Mucinous adenocarcinoma o GIT most frequently involved extranodal site for
 Colonic adenocarcinoma non-Hodgkin lymphoma
 Adenocarcinoid  Burkitt and leukemia also been
o Most commonly presents like an acute reported
appendicitis o Primary lymphoma frequency of 1-3%
 May have additional signs like ascites o Presents as acute appendicitis
and/or palpable mass o CT scan finding ≥ 2.5 cm or surrounding soft
 Neoplasm may incidentally be tissue thickening prompts suspicion
discovered perioperatively for an o If confined to appendix – appendectomy (w/o
unrelated cause adjuvant therapy
 Recommended treatment for all types o Extension of tumor onto cecum or mesentery -
– formal right hemicolectomy right hemicolectomy
o Have propensity for early perforation  With postoperative staging workup
o Px are at risk for both synchronous or before adjuvant therapy
metachronous neoplasms

You might also like