Future of Democracy in Pakistan
Future of Democracy in Pakistan
Outline
• Importance of democracy
• Threats to democracy
• Our strengths
• Conclusion
Essay
In this possibly terminal phase of human existence, freedom and democracy are just
more then ideals to be followed rather its necessary for survival. Noam Chomsky
Pakistan was the result of a political and democratic struggle but democracy could
not flourish during 62 years of its existence. The founder of Pakistan was a great
democratic statesman who envisioned a democratic and progressive Pakistan.
Unfortunately his illness couldn’t let him to contribute much for democracy. His death
was a fine blow to the political stability of Pakistan. Liaquat Ali Khan, a devoted
prime-minister elected from Eastern Pakistan was unacceptable to the ruling elite of
West Pakistan and was subsequently eliminated from the political scene in 1951.
These initial problems of Pakistan gave him little time to focus his attention on
democratic and constitutional development of newly born state. His sudden death
proved a serious blow to the nation. His successors dedicated their efforts to
perpetuate their rule showing little concern to democratic development. The early
years were marked with conspiracies, unethical and undemocratic tactics in power
corridors of the country. This situation provided opportunity to military to intervene in
politics and Ayub Khan imposed first Marshal Law in 1958. After this, army became a
stakeholder in power game and ruled the country four times through coups.
The recent government has assumed power through an electoral process but after 9
years of military rule. It has not completed even two years of its formation and
threats have surfaced to its existence. The current democracy is facing multifaceted
challenges on economic, social, political and international fronts. This needs a
sagacious approach to ensure continuance of democratic rule in Pakistan.
The clouds of uncertainty are hovering over the democratic set-up in Pakistan. The
major threat is absence of sound political infrastructure. Frequent Military
interventions prevented growth of political culture. Political parties could not be
established on modern and democratic lines. Political parities are nursuries of
democracy. In Pakistan these parties are plagued with outside influence, short term
goals, one man show and family politics. Political culture cannot flourish until political
parties start functioning in democratic manner.
Military has emerged as a stakeholder in political process that is against the very
spirit of democracy. Where it is permanent threat hanging over the government on
one hand, it encourages the undemocratic forces to destabilize democracy on the
other hand.
Economic difficulties are the barriers to Govt performance causing public discontent.
Pakistan government is facing financial difficulties. Its economy is under developed
characterized by huge trade deficit, heavy debt burden and deteriorating currency.
Government lacks the requisite economic resources for public uplift. Consequently
common men remain indifferent to national politics and democracy that induce
undemocratic forces to intervene.
The democratic system derives its strength from people. As former American
President, Abraham Lincoln, had said,
Where half of the Pakistani population is illiterate and stands unaware to democratic
concepts, even the major chunk of educated people remains also indifferent to
political developments in the country. This allures undemocratic forces to assume the
power and to their pleasure they are accorded warm welcome by the nation when
they assumed the charge. Political unawareness amongst the masses poses serious
threat to democracy. Democracy can flourish only if public at large get involved in the
political process.
The image of political leadership has been rotten over the time. Common men tend
to dislike the political personalities. They are held responsible for all the afflictions
Pakistan facing today. There are deficiencies in politicians, but these are projected to
the public with exaggeration of some facts along with certain myths. This mistrust of
public prevents them to concern about the political process. Political instability along
with economic difficulties pushed the country towards foreign dependence.
Resultantly, the international powers, in pursuance of their own goals, care little to
the democratic stability of the country. All the military rulers enjoyed foreign support.
75% of financial aid by USA was received during the military regime. Purportedly,
these foreign players intrigue to destabilize the political set up, when their interest
require doing so.
Pakistan unfriendly relations with India overpower its domestic and international
policies. Both the countries remained at logger heads since their inception. Pakistan,
in order to counter the menace of Indian adventures, had to allocate major chunk of
her resources for military development at the cost of negating other socio-economic
sectors of the country. She has to maintain a large army in spite of having limited
economic resources. Pakistan annually allocates 33% of her budget to defense on
average. If relations with India are normalized, these resources may be better spent
on public uplift, social welfare, education and health. If it happens it would bring
prosperity that strengthens the democratic foundations of the country.
Terrorism is one of the biggest threats to survival of entire humanity. The entire world
is intimidated of this menace and making efforts to counter it. Its afflictions are
pervasive and engulfing the peace and prosperity of the nation. The multiple
challenges lingering on democracy thus requires a multipronged struggle to counter
them.
Political parties are the primary institutions of democracy in order to provide a solid
foundation to edifice of democracy. Political parties have to re-organize and function
on democratic lines. These have to establish their roots at gross root level and
develop them like institutions open to public. Only political parties can ensure public
participation in political process and inculcate the democratic values. A dedicated
involvement of people at large would provide a solid base to democracy in Pakistan.
Educational uplift of the society makes its members well conversant to the concepts
of freedom, liberty and democracy. People learn the blessings of public rule. It
enhances their commitment to democracy and they can stand against the efforts to
derail the political process.
Economic growth brings prosperity in the life of common. A prosper society is more
likely to adopt democracy and actively engage in political process. Leadership
provides new direction to society and led them to the destination. Pakistan
desperately needs trustworthy leadership that people follow dedicatedly.
Our youth constitute 30% of the society they are representative of new generation.
Their participation may ensure structural improvements in national paradigm. It has
been witnessed that during Pakisan movement youth played vital role in opinion
formation and mass awareness and so is the time now. There is a need to guide our
youth to take the responsibility of our tomorrow. Its the high time when youth is active
and willing to welcome the dawn of democracy and it should be utilized to its fullest.