Chap5 Lecture4 (Hertzian Dipole)
Chap5 Lecture4 (Hertzian Dipole)
r
θ
A
dl y
O
B
φ
Page | 1
Antenna Fundamentals &Theory
I 0 dl j r
Az e A0 e j r (3)
4 r
I 0 dl
Where A0
4 r
Transforming this vector from Cartesian to spherical coordinates yields
A = (Ar, Aθ, AФ)
Where Ar Az Cos A0 Cos e j r (4A)
j r
A AZ Sin A0 Sin e (4B)
A 0 (4C)
We know B H And B X A
Therefore H
B
1
X A
ur r u r Sin u
1 1
H r u r H u H u
r Sin r
2
Ar r A r Sin A
ur r u r Sin u
1 1
H r ur H u H u
r Sin
2
r
A0Cos e j r r A0 Sin e j r 0
Page | 2
Antenna Fundamentals &Theory
ur r u r Sin u
j 1
Er u r E u E u
r Sin r
2
0 0 r Sin H
On expansion and equating the components we get
I 0 dl 1 j j r
Er Cos 2 e
2 r r 3 (6A)
I 0 dl j 1 j j r
E Sin 2 e
3
4 r r r
(6B)
E 0 (6C)
Where up
A close observation of the field equations in eqs (6A) and (6B) reveals that we have terms varying
as 1/r3, 1/r2, and 1/r.
The 1/r3 term is called the electrostatic field since it corresponds to the field of an electric dipole.
This term dominates over other terms in a region very close to the Hertzian dipole.
The 1/r2 term is called the inductive field, and it is predictable from the Biot-Savart law. The term
is important only at near field that is, at distances close to the current element.
The 1/r term is called the far field or radiation field because it is the only term that remains at the
far zone, that is, at a point very far from the current element.
Here, we are mainly concerned with the far field or radiation zone (βr >> 1 or 2πr >> λ), where
the terms in 1/r3 and 1/r2 can be neglected. Thus at far field,
I dl j j r
H 0 Sin e (7A)
4 r
I 0 dl j j r
E Sin e H
4 r (7B)
Er E H r H 0 (7C)
Note from eq. (7A) that the radiation terms of HФ and Eθ are in time phase and orthogonal just as
the fields of a uniform plane wave. Also note that near-zone and far-zone fields are determined
respectively to be the inequalities βr << 1 and βr >> 1. More specifically, we define the boundary
between the near and the far zones by the value of r given by
2d2
r (8)
Where d is the largest dimension of the antenna.
The time-average power density is obtained as
Page | 3
Antenna Fundamentals &Theory
1 1
Pave Re ( E H ) Re ( E H * u r )
2 2
1
Pave H 2 u r (9)
2
Where η is characteristic impedance of medium.
Substituting eq. (7) into eq. (9) yields the time-average radiated power as
Prad Pave . dS
2
I 02 2 dl 2
Prad
0 0 32 r
2 2
Sin 2 r 2 Sin d d
I 02 2 dl 2
Prad 2 Sin 3 d (10)
32 r
2 2
0
4
Sin d 3
3
But
0
4 2
And 2
2
Hence eq. (10) becomes
I 02 dl
2
Prad (11A)
3
u0
If free space is the medium of propagation, 120 and
0
2
dl
Prad 40 I 02
2
(11B)
This power is equivalent to the power dissipated in a fictitious resistance Rrad by current
I = Io Cosωt that is
Prad I rms
2
Rrad
1 2
Or Prad I 0 Rrad (12)
2
Where Irms is the root-mean-square value of current I. From eqs (11) and (12), we obtain
2P
Rrad 2rad (13A)
I0
2
dl
Or Rrad 80 2
(13B)
The resistance Rrad is a characteristic property of the Hertzian dipole antenna and is called its
radiation resistance. From eq. (12) one concludes that to deliver large amounts of power to space
antennas with large radiation resistances are needed.
Page | 4
Antenna Fundamentals &Theory
From eq. (13) one can see that Rrad depends on elemental length dl of the Hertizian dipole. For
example, if dl = λ/20, Rrad = 2 Ω, which is very small. Thus to have large Rrad dl should be large.
However we cannot increase the dl because in our analysis it is assumed that Hertzian dipole is
infinitesimally small. In practical case β dl <<1 or dl << λ/10 is considered a valid assumption.
It should be also noted that Rrad in eq. (13B) is for a Hertzian dipole operating in free space. If the
dipole is operating in a different, lossless medium then / is substituted in eq. (11A) and
Rrad is determined using eq. (13A).
The above analysis serves a useful, valid approximation for an antenna with dl <<λ/10. A more
practical (and perhaps the most important) antenna is the Half-Wave Dipole antenna which is
considered in the next section.
Page | 5