0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views4 pages

Performance Evaluation of The Single-Phase Split-Source Inverter Using An Alternative Dc-Ac Configuration

This document discusses the performance evaluation of a single-phase split-source inverter using an alternative DC-AC configuration. It begins by introducing single-stage power conversion systems and the split-source inverter as an alternative to the Z-source inverter. It then discusses existing single-phase split-source inverter systems that use additional MOSFETs instead of input diodes. The document proposes a new single-phase split-source inverter configuration that uses a standard B4-bridge and considers its four switching states to achieve boosting and inversion operations. It analyzes the performance of this configuration and discusses its advantages such as continuous DC-link voltage and input current, as well as lower switch voltage stresses and component
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views4 pages

Performance Evaluation of The Single-Phase Split-Source Inverter Using An Alternative Dc-Ac Configuration

This document discusses the performance evaluation of a single-phase split-source inverter using an alternative DC-AC configuration. It begins by introducing single-stage power conversion systems and the split-source inverter as an alternative to the Z-source inverter. It then discusses existing single-phase split-source inverter systems that use additional MOSFETs instead of input diodes. The document proposes a new single-phase split-source inverter configuration that uses a standard B4-bridge and considers its four switching states to achieve boosting and inversion operations. It analyzes the performance of this configuration and discusses its advantages such as continuous DC-link voltage and input current, as well as lower switch voltage stresses and component
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE SINGLE-

PHASE SPLIT-SOURCE INVERTER USING AN


ALTERNATIVE DC–AC CONFIGURATION

INTRODUCTION:
Single-stage dc–ac power conversion systems has
undergone a fast evolution during the last few years to replace
the conventional two-stage architecture, which includes a front-
end dc–dc boost converter (BC) and an output voltage-source
inverter (VSI). This evolution has grown up as a way to improve
the overall system performance, in terms of reducing its size and
complexity . Most of these single-stage topologies and their
different modulation schemes have been reviewed. Among these
different single-stage options, the three-phase split-source
inverter (SSI) has recently been proposed as an alternative
solution to the commonly used Z-source inverter (ZSI), in order
to overcome some of its demerits, such as the discontinuity of
the input dc current and the dc-link voltage and the high voltage
stresses at higher overall voltage gains.

EXISTING SYSTEM:

The single-phase operation of the SSI has been introduced


in, where the latter proposes the use of two MOSFETs working
in synchronous rectification mode at the fundamental frequency
instead of the two input diodes. The use of additional MOSFETs
cancels the high-frequency commutations of the input diodes,
allows a bidirectional power flow capability, which is not
mandatory in several applications, and improves the efficiency
due to the low ON resistance. Moreover, additional gate drive
circuitry and control signals should be considered, leading to
higher complexity and converter volume. On the other hand,
introduce a similar topology to the single-phase SSI, in which
two coupled inductors are utilized in order to achieve higher
voltage gain due to the system parasitic and the required high
duty cycle. It is worth to note that the SSI can achieve a
theoretical voltage gain of infinity, but a maximum gain from 4
to 5 can be achieved experimentally like the conventional two-
stage architecture. Meanwhile, higher voltage gains can be
obtained using means of coupled inductors .

DRAWBACKS:

 higher voltage stresses at lower voltage gains;


 higher current stresses at higher voltage gains;
 unequal current distribution among the different
switches; and
 high-frequency commutations of the input diodes

PROPOSED SYSTEM:

The utilized single-phase SSI configuration, shown in Fig.,


has a similar operation as the three-phase one proposed in This
single-phase SSI uses the standard B4-bridge and considers its
standard four switching states to achieve the boosting operation
within the inversion one. The inductor (L) charges when at least
one of the upper switches, i.e., SxU and SyU , is ON.
performance of the single-phase SSI, including a dc-side low-
frequency component analysis.

In this configuration, the input dc source is connected to the


positive point of the dc link and the diodes are reversed as
discussed i.e., it is possible to use a common-cathode dual-
diode package or two separate diodes. The merit behind the
common-cathode package is to achieve less parasitic inductance
in the commutation path of these diodes, resulting in less voltage
spikes across the different switches and enhancing the
performance of the SSI.

ADVANTAGES:

 continuous dc-link voltage. Hence, it is possible to use


high-frequency decoupling capacitors across the inverters
legs in order to minimize the voltage spikes across the
different switches due to the layout parasitic inductances;
 continuous input dc current;
 lower switch voltage stresses for higher overall voltage
gains;
 lower passive component count;

APPLICATIONS:

 Low input sources


 Photo voltaic resources

You might also like