A Rapid Introduction To ADE Theory - J. McKay
A Rapid Introduction To ADE Theory - J. McKay
John McKay
January 1, 2001
The natural numbers are the work of God, everything else is the work of man. -
Kronecker (translated from the German)
I show here how to derive the Dynkin graphs and all the semi-simple Lie algebras from the
natural numbers:
1-2-3-4-5-...
Each node is an irreducible representation of SU(2). The numbers are the degrees of these
representations. I call this graph the representation graph of SU(2) because it is built from the
fundamental (natural) representation, R of SU(2) and the equations:
For each finite subgroup G in SU(2), we restrict the representations R[i] to G. This then splits the
representations of SU(2) into irreducibles of G.
1a
/
1-2-1b
\
1c
from the initial segment of 1-2-3-...
which is the affine Dynkin graph of type D4. (We break off as soon as representations repeat.)
For each finite subgroup of SU2, we get an affine Dynkin graph in this way. "Affine" means
adding an extra node corresponding to the negative of the highest root. The correspondence is:
The non-ADE types correspond to certain pairs (G,H), H < G in SU(2). The ADE Dynkin graphs
are:
1
A[r] / \ (an (r+1)-gon)
/ \
1-...-1
3
|
E[8] 1-2-3-4-5-6-4-2
To get the other Dynkin graphs, we "fold" these ones by replacing nodes by the equivalence
classes of nodes under orbits of graph automorphisms. There are several ways of doing this.
Repeated folding and reversing arrows and unfolding, yields, for example, the sequence: D4 - G2
- E6 - F4 - E7. One may interpret the reversals in terms of Frobenius reciprocity.
By taking traces of (*) on the identity, we see that the adjacency matrices m[i,j] of all these
Dynkin graphs have a maximal eigenvalue of 2. This is the crucial characterizing property of
affine Dynkin graphs. The corresponding eigenvector has irreducible degrees for its components.
The columns of the character table of G are eigenvectors and the row of the 2-dimensional
representation is the row of eigenvalues.
Leonard E. Dickson, Algebraic Theories, Dover Publications, New York, 1959, Chapter
13.
It goes as follows: we project from the North pole of the sphere escribed to the Platonic solid,
through each vertex on to the equatorial plane (which we interpret as the complex plane). Thus
we may identify each vertex with a complex number v[i], and we form the (homogeneous)
polynomial V(x,y) = Π(x-v[i]y). Similarly we form E(x,y) from the midpoints of the edges, and
F(x,y) from the normals through the centre of the faces. These are three functions in two
variables and so there is a relation f(V,E,F) = 0. This is a singularity of the simplest kind which
can be "desingularized" into a set of exceptional fibres which are complex projective lines
intersecting as the dual of the Dynkin graph of finite type. The intersection matrix = M-2I = -C
where M is the matrix m[i,j] which we started with (without the affine node), and C is a Cartan
matrix from which we can derive the generators and Serre's relations for a Lie algebra. Including
the affine node yields Kac-Moody generators and relations and relates to elliptic singularities.
Caveat: for the E8 = icosahedral = <2,3,5> case, the singularity is x2+y3+z5 = 0 (see exercise in
Hartshorne's book on Algebraic Geometry) but it is NOT xa+yb+zc = 0 in every case:
E8: x2+y3+z5 = 0
E7: x2+y3+yz3 = 0
E6: x2+y3+z4 = 0
This correspondence between the Platonic groups and the Lie algebras of type A,D,E is
described in
Peter Slodowy, Simple singularities and simple algebraic groups, in Lecture Notes in
Mathematics 815, Springer, Berlin, 1980.
By using a subgroup to get the equivalence classes, we get the F,G series too.
By removing any directed edge(s in the case of A-type) starting at the affine node, we have what
I name the semi-affine Dynkin graph, which generalizes both affine and finite type Dynkin
graphs.
We can solve the geometric eigenproblem for rational polynomial solutions in t, of:
t*n[i] = ∑ n[j]
{successor nodes, j, of i}
We find that t occurs naturally as 2cos(a), and so put t = q+1/q, clear denominators, and
normalize the affine node to n[0]= 1+qh, where h is the Coxeter number of the corresponding Lie
group by my correspondence. This gives polynomial solutions in q. If we now divide by (1-qa)(1-
qb) where a + b = h + 2, and ab = 2|G|, then we find a solution given by
X[i](g-1) n[i](q)
m[i](G) = (1/|G|) ∑ ____________ = _____________
g ∈ G det(I-gq) (1-qa)(1-qb)
where X[i] is the ith irreducible character of G, (X[0]=1), and G < SU2(C), by my
correpondence, is the generalised Molien series.
There is a remarkable connection between the three groups: M(onster), 2.B(aby Monster) and
3.F24 and the graphs for E8, E7, and E6 respectively.
In each of the above groups there are involutions (elements of period two) such that the product
of pairs of them lies in one of 9,8,7 conjugacy classes respectively. The periods of elements in
these classes are exactly the numbers used to label the extended Dynkin graphs (the coefficients
of the highest roots) as long as we read this period modulo the centre. We may alternatively work
with the folded Dynkin graphs of type E8, F4, G2 and collapse the centre. By moonshine, this
means that each node of these extended graphs can be labelled by a modular function given by
the moonshine correspondence, with the elliptic modular function j(z) corresponding to the
identity of M and so to the affine node of the E8 Dynkin graph. There is a similar interpretation
for the other nodes. Adjacency is not understood but there should be a mechanism for obtaining
the neighbours of a moonshine modular function occurring here.
There have been many applications of these ideas in various contexts. Let me cite two: Peter
Kronheimer has used them in his paper on asymptotically locally flat and asymptotically locally
euclidean spaces in connection with cosmological geometry.
They are also being used in finding the spectral lines associated with the newly discovered C60
molecules of fullerenes. This provides a good example of the unity of mathematics and the
nonsense of the distinction between pure and applied.
This correspondence has appeared in the book Roots of Consciousness as a basis for an
explanation of consciousness!
References
John McKay, Graphs, singularities and finite groups, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. vol. 37,
Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1980, pp. 183-186.
David Ford and John McKay, Representations and Coxeter Graphs, in The Geometric
Vein; Coxeter Festschrift, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 549-554.
John McKay, Semi-affine Coxeter-Dynkin graphs and G <=SU(2), Coxeter Festschrift,
Canad. Jour. Math. 51 1999, 1226-1229.
Moral: Read the original - the Timaeus by Plato (ca. 430-350 B.C.).