Design & Buildability For Infrastructure: Projects
Design & Buildability For Infrastructure: Projects
Lecturer Co-Lecturer
Henry Liu-Adjunct Professor-HKU David Hung
BSc(Hons) C Eng FHK IE FIC E BSc(Hons) CEng MICE, FIStructE,
FIStructE FCIHT FH KIHT R.P.E .(CVL FHKIE, RSE, 1PRC-RSE, RPE(CVL,STL))
STL GE L LTE) 1PRC-RSE
MCIArb MAE
1
MSc Degree Course
CVL6059 – Special Topic on Infrastructure Project Management
Design & Buildability of Infrastructure Projects
Lecture 12 – 18/11/2020 (7.00-9:30)
Duration
1. Content of the Lecture 3 mins
2 Collection of Assignment from the “collection box” 8 mins
2a The Roof- ZMH Terminus (video 12.0) 8 mins
3. Review of lectures by Henry Liu 20 mins
4. Review of lectures by David Hung 20 mins
5. High speed Rail in China (the future- Hyperloop)---- Video12-1; 12-2; 12-3 15 mins
6. BREAK 10 mins
7. General discussion on the “Take-home Exam via Moodle” 10 mins
8. The rise of china on infrastructural developments – Video 12-4 12 mins
9. The collapse of the Nicoll Highway, Singapore---video 12.5; 12.6 20 mins
10. Construction of foundation and structural steelworks 10 mins
11. Discussion , Good Luck and Good Bye (Q&A) 9 mins
12. Belt and Road---- Video 12-7(2 mins) 5 mins
2
1a Course Description and Aims
Design and Buildability are an integral process for the development of any infrastructure projects. From
early inception of implementation, the design concept must be borne in mind the need to take buildability
into account from broad approach to minor detailing. This is a project management technique to review
construction process from start to finish during the pre-construction phase in order to identify any
construction obstacles before a project is actually built to reduce cost and/or prevent accidents. The term
“buildability” defines the ease and efficiency with which structures can be built in a cost effective manner
both in terms of software and hardware. Given the current sophistication in the construction industry, this
would include not only the right design tool but also the application of value management, partnering, risk
management, BIM, NEC as well as safety management or even virtual reality, etc.
It cannot be over-emphasised such integral process of “design and buildability” which covers bridges,
railway station, tunnel, road, airport, port and reclamation. The more buildable an infrastructure project is,
the more economical it will be. “Design and buildability” are in part a reflection of the quality of a project.
That is to say, if the design document is difficult to understand and to interpret, the project will be difficult
to build and vice versa.
This MSc course is designed to provide an in-depth understanding of key principle of design and buildability
which underline the important aspects of any infrastructure projects taking the Hong Kong conditions into
account. By the end of this course, students should be able to appreciate the inter-relationship between
design and buildability from planning, design, construction and commission.
3
4
5
2a Collection of Assignment from Students
(8 mins)
6
Video 12.0 :The Roof- ZMH Terminus (8 mins)
VIDEO SEPARATELY
7
3. Review of Lectures by Henry Liu
8
MSc Degree Course
CVL6059 – Special Topic on Infrastructure Project Management
Design & Buildability for Infrastructure Projects
Lecture 1 – 2/9/2020 (7.00-9:30)
Duration
1. Welcome 8 mins
Duration
1. Welcome/contents of this lecture 5 mins
2. Video 3-1 (12 mins) – Milau Bridge – tallest bridge in the world 15 mins
3 Buildability in construction 5 mins
3a. Definition of constructability – video 3-2 (2 mins) 3 mins
3b. Constructability in 3 minutes– video 3-3 (3 mins) 4 mins
4. Project Management 8 mins.
4a. Teamwork (somebody) 2 min
4b Safety Management, Risk Management, Partnering 8 mins
5. Partnering - Video 3-4 (3 mins) 5 mins
6. Design & Buildability for Ting Kau Bridge (My Paper) 1.17km 1998 5 mins
BREAK 15 mins
7. Video 3-5 (47 mins) – Ting Kau Bridge 50 mins
8. Collapse of Nicoll Highways – 3 videos 3-6 (12 mins) 15 mins
9 Discussion 10 mins
Total: 150 mins
10
MSc Degree Course
CVL6059 – Special Topic on Infrastructure Project Management
Design & Buildability of Infrastructure Projects
Lecture 5 – 30/9/2020 (7:00-9:30)
Duration
1. Content of the Lecture 2 mins
1a Video 5-1 (4.5mins) – Tacoma Narrow Bridge Collapse 5 mins
2. Value Engineering 7 mins
2a Video 5-2 (6 mins) – Definition of Value Engineering 7 mins
2b. Video 5-3 (8 mins) – Value Engineering Application 9 mins
3. Not used
4. Risk Management 5 mins
4a. Video 5-5 (4 mins) – What is Risk Management 4 mins
5. Virtual Reality – Video 5-6 (4 mins) – Virtual Reality in Construction 5 mins
6. Building Information Modelling (BIM) 5 mins
6a. Video 5-7 (3 mins) – What is Civil BIM 4 mins
6b. Video 5-8 (5 mins) – BIM vs Virtual Reality 6 mins
6c. Video 5-9 (12 mins) BIM Arch bridge in Gui Zhou 13 mins
BREAK 15 mins
11
MSc Degree Course
CVL6059 – Special Topic on Infrastructure Project Management
Design & Buildability of Infrastructure Projects
Lecture 7 – 14/10/20 (7:00-9:30pm)
Duration
1. Content of the Lecture 2 mins
2. ZMH Crossing – C.F. Lee HKU (Video 7-1 -7 mins) 10 mins
2a ZMH Crossing – IMT (Video 7-2-6 mins) 8 mins
3. Collapse of Shanghai Building (2007) 10 mins
4. Design & Construction for the widening of Castle Peak Road (9.5km) 2005
(power point 7-3) 25 mins
BREAK 20 mins
5. Collapse of a roof structure – HK City University 5 mins
5a. Videos 7-4-(10:48 mins) 12 mins
6. Highway Construction in Gui Zhou Province (Video 7-5, 6 mins) 8 mins
7. Florida Bridge collapse 2017(ICE abstract ,May 2018) 5 mins
7a. Video 7-6 – Florida Bridge collapse (two short videos – 1 +10 mins) 12 mins
8. Ten bridges collapse in recent years – (Video 7-7, 10 mins) 12 mins
9. Bei-Jing Airport-video 7-8 (2 mins)/Kansai Airport(Photo 7-9) 5 mins
10 Discussion 16 mins
150 mins 12
4. Review of Lectures by David Hung
13
CIVL 6059
Special Topic in Infrastructure Project Management:
Design and Buildability for Infrastructure Projects
Lecture 2,4 and 6 : Construction of Foundation, Excavation and Lateral Support and
Geotechnical Instrumentation
Lecture 8: Design of Complex Steel Structure, Long Span Steel Structure and Post-
tensioned concrete footbridge
14
Construction of Foundation
1. Bored pile
2. Driven H pile
3. RSHP
4. Minipile
5. Jack in pile
6. Barrette pile
1. Bored Pile 2. Driven H Pile (w/ pre-boring) 3. Rock Socketted H Pile
H piles are driven by JUNTTAN
16-ton hydraulic hammer
16
4. Mini pile
Usually consists of a number of steel reinforcing bars encased by grout inside a drill hole.
17
5. Jack in Piles
- This method does not generate noise, smoke and is vibration free.
- The custom- designed silent jack-in piling machine varies in size, depending on the
type of pile used and the required jacking force.
- Horizontally sliding hydraulic cylinders and weight transfer plates allow the piling rig to be
maneuvered accurately to the piling points.
- The pile jacking force at any instant is read from the hydraulic load indicator connected to the main
injection cylinder.
18
6. Barrette piles
- they are installed by machine excavation into bentonite slurry filled trench down to
the founding level, inserting the rebar cage and concreting the excavated trench by
tremie method.
- usually of rectilinear sections and founded by end bearing on rock
- Other founding materials may be used provided their suitability is demonstrated.
19
Excavation and Lateral Support
1. Secant piled wall
2. Contiguous piled wall
3. D- Wall
4. Sheet piled wall
5. Pipe piled wall
6. Soldier piled wall
7. Grout curtain
1. Secant Piled Wall
Primary pile
soft / firm pile
drilled first
Cement or lean concrete
Secondary pile
hard pile
reinforced cage / steel beam
normal dia = 600 mm
Advantage
Flexible in wall alignment, suit curved wall
Can overcome hard pans/cobbles/boulder
Cause Less vibration and noise nuisance
Disadvantage
Problem in maintain verticality for long piles
100% watertight is not possible, potential leakage occurs at the joint between hard pile and
soft / firm pile
ELS Design – anchored Secant Piled Wall
2. Contiguous pile wall
(Hong Kong / Middle East)
2. Contiguous pile wall (with anchors)
(Hong Kong / Middle East)
Contiguous pile wall (with anchors)
(Hong Kong / Middle East
3. D - wall
a. Diaphragm wall ( D – wall) is a reinforced concrete
structure constructed in‐situ panel by panel. Typical panel
per bite = 2.8 to 3.0 m
Thickness varies from 900 mm to 1500 mmm
1. The bored pile with I Section is designed as composite section with Steel I section and concrete. Shear is
transferred from the I section to the concrete by shear studs. Design refer to Eurocode EN 1990
Basis of structural design
2. Lock in stress of the steel I section shall be checked since the steel I section is loaded and deflected when
the basement floor slab is cast.
Design of Diaphragm Wall
Design of Diaphragm Wall
Design of Diaphragm Wall
4. Sheet Piled Wall
(driven by vibration hammer)
Sheet piled wall
Preloading of struts
Sheet piled wall
Preloading of struts
5. Pipe piled wall
Common ELS Type
6. Soldier Piled Wall
6. Soldier Piled Wall
Common ELS Type
6. Soldier Piled Wall
Common ELS Type
7. Grout curtain
(1). Provide a barrier to prevent
water ingress into the cofferdam,
Lecture 11
Introduction to Railway Engineering
Introduction to Railway Engineering
1. Permanent Way
2. Trackform
3. Overhead Line Structure
4. Rolling Stock – vehicle dynamics
5. Station Layout Design
6. Ancillary System
7. Railway Protection
8. Maintenance Depot
9. Noise Attenuation System
10. Case study – Depot Upgrading
P WAY
Rail
Sleepers
Ballast
Subgrade
Rails --- fitted on sleeper and joined by fish plates.
1. Train lengths
2. Track level plant rooms requirements
5. High Speed Rail in China (The Future-
Hyperloop)
82
Video 12-1
83
Video 12-2
84
85
6. BREAK
86
7. General discussion on the “Take-home
Exam via Moodle
87
88
8. The Rise of China on
Infrastructural Developments
(Video separately )
89
9. The collapse of the Nicoll
Highway , Singapore
90
Video 12.5(6 mins)
91
Video 12.6 (3 mins)
92
93
94
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The collapse of the Nicoll Highway in Singapore which took place on 20, April 2004 was rooted in history.
It began with two critical design errors. These were the under-design of the diaphragm wall and the under-design of the
waler connection in the strutting system. These design errors resulted in the failure of the 9th level strut-waler connections
together with the inability of the overall temporary retaining wall system to resist the redistributed loads as the 9th strutting
failed. The catastrophic collapse then ensured.
The collapse did not develop suddenly. A chain of events preceded the collapse.
Several technical and administrative factors contributed to the collapse. From the early stages through to the final collapse,
there were failure to demonstrate the necessary level of care. Serious human errors were made. Warnings of the
approaching collapse were present from an early stage but these were not taken seriously. The contractor did not
adequately deal with insidious warning signs. A multiplicity of events led to the position where design, construction ,
instrumentation, management and organizational systems used by the contractor and their sub-contractors failed. There
were failures in the defensive systems. There were no proper and appropriate design reviews. There were inadequate
contingency and remedial measures.
Two significant contributory factors were the abuse of the back analyses where the collapse took place and the failure to
institute a regular , close and effective monitoring regime. The two critical back analyses were geotechnically flawed. There
were repeated breaches of the instrumentation review. All the experts agreed that on the basis of the second back analysis,
works should not have been allowed to proceed in that area.
The catastrophic collapse was the finale to mounting incidences and warning of excessive wall deflection , surging
inclinometer readings , waler beam buckling, stiffener plates buckling, ground settlement, trespass of water and soils into
the excavation through cracks in the diaphragm walls, failure of concrete corbels and waler beams, failing support brackets ,
plunging strain gauge readings, and the “thung” sounds of distress over 6 hours on 20 April 2004 from the heart of the
strutting system.
Time took its toll. 3:30pm, 20 April 2004- the Nicoll Highway collapsed. The collapse falls squarely on the contractor,
Nishimatsu-Lum Joint Venture. The Nicoll Highway collapse could have been prevented.
95
10.Construction of Foundation and
Structural Steelwork
96
Construction of Foundation
Large Diameter Bored Pile
Construction methodology
Method in overcoming obstruction
Quality assurance
Remedial methods
Construction of Foundation
Driven H pile
Construction methodology
Method in overcoming obstruction
Quality assurance
Final set
Pile load test
Construction of Foundation
Rock Socketted H pile
Construction methodology
Method in overcoming obstruction
Design principle
Quality assurance
Pile Load Test
Construction of Structural Steelwork
102
12. Belt and Road
103
Video 12-7
104
105