Scribd
Upload
119 views

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

Deduction begins with premises assumed to be true and determines what else must be true. It can provide absolute proof if the premises are correct but cannot prove the premises. Induction begins with data and determines what general conclusions can be logically drawn, which determines potential theories but does not prove them. An effective argument uses both deduction and induction: deduction provides structure but cannot be tested, while induction is based on observation but never proves theories, so together they provide a stronger argument.

Uploaded by

Aga Chimdesa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
119 views

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

Deduction begins with premises assumed to be true and determines what else must be true. It can provide absolute proof if the premises are correct but cannot prove the premises. Induction begins with data and determines what general conclusions can be logically drawn, which determines potential theories but does not prove them. An effective argument uses both deduction and induction: deduction provides structure but cannot be tested, while induction is based on observation but never proves theories, so together they provide a stronger argument.

Uploaded by

Aga Chimdesa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

Deduction

In the process of deduction, you begin with some statements, called “premises,” that are
assumed to be true, you then determine what else would have to be true if the premises
are true.

For example, you can begin by assuming that God exists, and is good, and then determine
what would logically follow from such an assumption. You can begin by assuming that if
you think, then you must exist, and work from there.

With deduction you can provide absolute proof of your conclusions, given that your
premises are correct. The premises themselves, however, remain unproven and
unprovable.[1]

Examples of deductive logic:


1. All men are mortal. Joe is a man. Therefore Joe is mortal. If the first two statements
are true, then the conclusion must be true.[2]
2. Bachelors are unmarried men. Bill is unmarried. Therefore, Bill is a bachelor. [3]
3. To get a Bachelor’s degree at Utah State University, a student must have 120
credits. Sally has more than 130 credits. Therefore, Sally has a bachelor’s degree.

Induction
In the process of induction, you begin with some data, and then determine what general
conclusion(s) can logically be derived from those data. In other words, you determine what
theory or theories could explain the data.

For example, you note that the probability of becoming schizophrenic is greatly increased if
at least one parent is schizophrenic, and from that you conclude that schizophrenia may be
inherited. That is certainly a reasonable hypothesis given the data.

However, induction does not prove that the theory is correct. There are often alternative
theories that are also supported by the data. For example, the behavior of the
schizophrenic parent may cause the child to be schizophrenic, not the genes.

What is important in induction is that the theory does indeed offer a logical explanation of
the data. To conclude that the parents have no effect on the schizophrenia of the children
is not supportable given the data, and would not be a logical conclusion. [4]

Examples of inductive logic:


1. This cat is black. That cat is black. A third cat is black. Therefore all cats are black. [5]
2. This marble from the bag is black. That marble from the bag is black. A third marble
from the bag is black. Therefore all the marbles in the bag black. [6]
3. Two-thirds of my latino neighbors are illegal immigrants. Therefore, two-thirds of
latino immigrants come illegally.
4. Most universities and colleges in Utah ban alcohol from campus. That most
universities and colleges in the U.S. ban alcohol from campus.

Deduction and induction by themselves are inadequate to make a compelling argument.


While deduction gives absolute proof, it never makes contact with the real world, there is
no place for observation or experimentation, and no way to test the validity of the premises.
And, while induction is driven by observation, it never approaches actual proof of a theory.
Therefore an effective paper will include both types of logic. [7]

You might also like