Lean Manufacturing 2
Lean Manufacturing 2
S afety
Q uality
W aste Cost
Delivery
M oral
Week 3 Lean Manufacturing/ Process Improvement Slide 3
Why Problem Solving
Problem
Improvement
Solving
and
deviation
theP resentorA ctual
Condition standard
Discrepancy Between
Standard or
Expectation and A ctual
S udden Change
A ctual
S tandard perform ance
perform ance
R ecurring
Change Change Change Change
Degradation
S tandard
S tandard perform ance Change
perform ance
A ctual
perform ance
DO ES
Yes T HE No
DA M N
T HIN G
W O RK
DO N ’T M ES S
W IT H IT
Yes DID YO U
M ES S
W IT H IT
No DO ES
A N YBO D FO U L -U P S HA P P EN
Y KN O W
Yes W IL L No
Yes YO U
CA T CH
HECK
HIDEIT
YO U ’R E IN T R O U BL E
No
DU M P ITDU M P IT
CA N YO U
BL A M E
A N YBO D
Y EL S E
N O PN RO O P LR EM
O BL EM
The problem is an
opportunity
to find out,
how to do better !
U nsolved
problem scan
becom ea
bigger
problem !
A Systematic Approach
Team Approach
The best way
Everybody involved in Problem Solving in all aspects of a
process
Advanced
Major Kaizen
Standard Kaizen
Kaizen
Quick
Kaizen
5 Why
5G
1 Week 3 Months Time
Taken
PROBLE
M QUICK KAIZEN STANDARD MAJOR KAIZEN ADVANCED
SOLVING KAIZEN KAIZEN
Autonomous Activities PPA
Tag Tag
F.I. Tracking & Support Focused Improvement
Professional Maintenance
EWO 5 WHYS PDCA
SKILL TO
SOLVE
Quality Control
OPL 4M
Team Member
+
Team Member Team Expert Team Work
Team Member + + Team Work +
Team Expert BU Leader Specialists
YES No
Fishbone
If you find a cause/
see the snake
JUST KILL IT!
I see it
5 Why
“If you go to the place where things are happening, study the thing
is suffering / producing effects, analyze the real situation using the
theory, probably you're going to find a solution and "create" the
standards to avoid re-occurrence”.
Machine
Material
Method
Measurements
Environment
Information
Machines Materials
Cause
Cause Cause Cause Cause
Cause Cause
Cause Cause
Effect
Cause Cause Cause
Cause SYMPTOM
Cause Cause
Minor Cause Cause
Human Environment
W hy ?
- do notstop afterfirst W hy?
detectedcause! Defective Coolant
Hose Flange
-lookforhidden causes! W hy ?
Why 5?
1st
Cause
2nd
Cause
3rd
Im plem entingsolutionsat Cause
thisstagew illonly be 4th
troubleshooting,because Cause
realcausehasnotbeen 5th
identifiedandelim inatedyet. Cause
R ealcausearoundthis
stage
Incorrect
charge
Jum p of
charge
Foreachpossiblecausew ehaveto
M etalchips O ilpum p NO K
investigateto understand ifitisthe
contam ination contam ination
real“rootcause” oftheproblem or
not
L ackof O illevelin O K
lubricant tank
O ilnon O ilcharacteristics O K
conform ity
Incorrect Charge O K
charge level
Jum p of Charge O K
charge flow
Method Material
Reduce part
CMM machine Part waiting to
cool off related
capacity cool off
waiting time
Multiple cutter
CMM machine Re-visit test
changes at a
capacity capacity
time
Longer tool
Change Over Bad bearing on investigate an
process time cutter body ensure rectification
Repetitive work
Miss built causing Verification system
Bad setup
cutters In place
mistakes
GRAPH 1 GRAPH 2
“Continuous Flow”
is the
Essence of
“Single Piece Flow”
Week 3 Lean Manufacturing/ Process Improvement Slide 69
Continuous Flow
Caution:
• Level 4 and 5 automation increases
capital cost and complexity
• Decrease in customer demand
leads to underutilized fully
automated machine
• Level 3 automation can achieve
many of the benefits offered by full
automation
Pull System
• coordinated production
• driven by demand (pulled through system)
• extensive use of visual trigger
• production/withdrawal kanban
k = DL(1 + S)/C
k = Number of kanban card sets
D = Average number of units demanded over some time period
L = Lead time to replenish an order (expressed in the same units as demand)
S = Safety stock expressed as a percentage of demand during the lead time
C = Container size
A bottling plant fills 2,400 bottles every two hours. The lead time is 40 minutes and a
container accommodates 120 bottles. The safety stock is 10 percent of expected demand.
How many kanban cards are needed?
D = If the average number of units demanded is 2400 and the time period is 2 hours, then
that's the same as 1200 in an hour, 1200 in 60 minutes, 20 in one minute.
L = 40
S = 0.1
C = 120
k = 20 * 40 (1 + 0.1) / 120
Week 3 Lean Manufacturing/ Process Improvement Slide 102
Quick Changeover
Quick Changeover is one of the core concepts of lean
manufacturing
A rapid and efficient way of converting a process from
running the current product to running the next product
Also known as “single minute exchange of dies” (SMED)
– derived from the desire to change over any process
within minutes instead of hours
Reduces the waste of inventory by creating shorter
production runs that better align with customer demand
• Definition:
– Changeover is the total process of converting a
machine or line from running one product to another
Definition:
• Changeover time is the total elapsed time between the last unit
of good production of the previous run, at normal line efficiency,
to the first unit of good production of the succeeding run, at full
line efficiency.
Objective:
• Reduce changeover from hours to single minutes
Better quality
• Very defined setup processes
Lower cost
• Less scrap and inventory
Better flexibility
• Rapidly change from product to product
Better worker utilization
• Less time spent on setup or waiting for the run to start
Shorter lead time and more capacity
Less process variability
Week 3 Lean Manufacturing/ Process Improvement Slide 109
SMED is Continuous Improvement
Team-work
• Recorder
» Record overall duration (from last product to first good product).
» Video recorders work very well
» Describe the change (from what to what?).
• Timers
» Time each step
• Fact collectors
» Breakdown the steps into actions – as much detail as possible.
» Use a layman to ask uninformed questions – challenge the
“accepted norm”.
• Timers.
• Aim to have 10-20 steps for each changeover.
• Record the elapsed time. Calculate the step time later.
Elapsed Step
Lower
operating Faster, more
Reduced
costs dependable
inventory
throughput
Continuous Improved
improvement quality
Dedicated people
• A project champion to drive and coordinate the project
• Breakdown Maintenance
– Reactive “wait until it breaks” strategy
• Preventative Maintenance
– Traditional scheduled periodic maintenance
• Predictive Maintenance
– Using monitoring equipment coupled with historical
data to predict life cycle of components
Corrective Maintenance
• Modification or improvement of equipment based on root cause
analysis of failures
Maintenance Elimination
• Equipment designed to eliminate all forms of maintenance
1. Select Facilitator
2. Select first TPM area and team
3. Develop goals and schedule
4. Train team members and operators in
autonomous maintenance
5. Train maintenance technicians in preventative
maintenance
6. Train maintenance technicians in predictive
maintenance
Requires:
• Employee involvement
• Maintenance and reliability procedures
To yield:
• Reduced inventory
• Improved quality
• Improved capacity
• Reputation for quality
• Continuous improvement
Information sharing
Skill training
Reward system
Power sharing
Number of failures
Failure Rate(%) = ------------------------------------ * 100%
Number of units tested
Number of failures
Failure per operating hr= ---------------------------------------
FR(N) Operating Time
1
Mean Time Between Failure= -------------
FR(N)
Total Operational Time
Mean Time Between Failure(MTBF) = --------------------------------
Total # of Failures